Virginia DCR- Natural Heritage Program. Tools for Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning

Similar documents
Map Development 5/15/2012. New Virginia Modeling Tools

Conservation Corridor Planning and Green Infrastructure Themes

National Association of Conservation Districts. Kris Hoellen Vice President, Sustainable Programs The Conservation Fund September 19, 2013

Great Lakes Conservation Blueprint for Terrestrial Biodiversity on the Canadian Shield

Green Infrastructure. by Karen Engel, NYS DEC. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Brockton. Produced in This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area.

Countywide Green Infrastructure

Conservation Corridor Base and Thematic Maps

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Figure 1. Proposed Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas for Florida

Southwest Florida Water Management District Conservation Land Acquisition Project Boundary Review Ecological GIS Decision Support System Final Report

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

Biodiversity and Urban Streets

3-2 Environmental Systems

Landscape Conservation Design June, 2014

EC Conference on Green Infrastructure Green Infrastructure Applications in the U.S. Kris Hoellen, The Conservation Fund

Key Elements of Successful Conservation Planning. John Paskus October 17, 2013 Pierce Cedar Creek Institute Michigan Natural Features Inventory

Green Infrastructure Planning for Sustainability and Resiliency

BLOOMSBURY BOROUGH. Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation. 1 inch = 0.28 miles. Zone. Sub-Zone FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP GREENWICH TOWNSHIP

One County s Success in Linking Watershed Protection and Land Use Planning

Florida Forever Conservation Needs Assessment Overview Maps

Making Data Work for You: Free Mapping Tools for Prioritization and Property Research

Blue/Green Infrastructure Study Accomack County, VA

Overview of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s (SPC) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

Executive Summary. Essential Connectivity Map (Figure ES-1)

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

The Landscape Project. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish and Wildlife Endangered and Nongame Species Program

Large Landscape Restoration and the National Park System

Community Conservation Workshop. Saranac River Basin Communities

Dedham. Produced in This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area.

An Update on the Air Force Pilot Project: Developing the Florida Strategic Plan for Sustaining Military Readiness through Conservation Partnerships

CALGARY: City of Animals Edited by Jim Ellis

Level 1: GIS-based Desktop Assessments. Meghan Burns, Landscape Ecologist

Incorporating Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Cultural Information Into Wetland Protection, Management, and Restoration - Tulalip Reservation

North Bellingham and Urban Growth Boundary Wetland, Stream, Habitat Conservation Area and Buffer Assessment TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Making Space for Nature A Leicester Case Study. Dr Helen O Brien Leicester City Council

Case Study: City of San Mateo

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

Lecture: Landscape Ecology

A Landscape Scale Approach to Habitat Conservation

Development of a Resource Planning Index for Washington's Scenic and Recreational Highways

TRCA Roles and Responsibilities in Planning and Development

Los Angeles River-Arroyo Seco Confluence Restoration Vision Plan. Professor Meredith McKenzie, JD Urban & Regional Planning Dept Cal Poly Pomona

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE for the U.S.

Integrating Transportation Planning with Land Use and Conservation Through Decision Support Tools

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Phase I Ecological Network Report Terms of Reference

Aquatic, Terrestrial and Landscape Conservation Design Tools and Products of the North Atlantic LCC

PUBLIC NOTICE. us Anny Corps CENAE-R-A FILE NO. NAE

research report Virginia Transportation Research Council Final Report VTRC 07-R14

Technical Memorandum 5

INTRODUCTION PLANNING HISTORY

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

FREEDOM S WAY GIS INVENTORY

Mosaic of patches Agents of patch formation: Environmental constraints (Abiotic) Biotic processes Disturbances (natural and human induced)

Oakland County s Green Infrastructure Vision. L. Brooks Patterson Oakland County Executive

Photo by Carlton Ward Jr. Executive Summary

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

I ll be talking about the Designing Sustainable Landscapes project today. This is a large integrated modeling effort our group at UMass has been

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SENSITIVE ECOSYSTEMS

Phase II Ecological Network Report Terms of Reference. Terms of Reference

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

3. Highway Landscaping Assessment

GIS to Estimate Archaeological Site Loss and Develop Conservation Strategies

San Francisco Bay Area Upland Habitat Goals Project

Antioch Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan

Richton Park Western Development Corridor Green Infrastructure Development Plan August 18, 2017

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program June 18, 2018 Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative Update

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Green (and blue) Infrastructure Planning in VA

CITY OF LONDON COVES ESA CONSERVATION MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh, PA Notice No Closing Date: May 29, 2015

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Open Space and Farmland Preservation

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

Historic Asset Management A Decision Support Process for Balanced Consideration of Mission Utility, Historic Value, and Facility Condition

Outline of remarks. Corridor ecology: a snapshot. Definitions, cont.

INTEGRATING PROTECTION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES INTO THE PLANNING PROCESS IN FLORIDA

Green Infrastructure for Resiliency

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

NJ Habitat Connectivity Initiative

MRCCA PRIMARY CONSERVATION AREAS

Township of Adjala-Tosorontio Official Plan Review. Natural Heritage

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

APPENDIX I Presentations

Using AutoCAD Civil 3D and ESRI ArcGIS to meet LEED-ND (Neighborhood Development) Requirements NDIA O Brien & Gere. All Rights Reserved.

Appendices. Contents. Appendices - Sep 1997 CP-1 AP-1

Landscape Strategies for Promotion of Urban Biodiversity Involvement of Ecologists Maryann Harris Past-President Irish Landscape Institute

The Art and Science of Stormwater Retrofitting

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

Transcription:

Virginia DCR- Natural Heritage Program Tools for Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning November 9, 2009

MISSION: to conserve Virginia's biodiversity through statewide biological inventory, protection, and stewardship. by maintaining a statewide database for conservation planning, project review, land protection for the conservation of biodiversity, and the protection and ecological management of natural heritage resources

Virginia Natural Heritage Program Created in 1989 Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act Focus: Rare plants and animals & exemplary natural communities Methods: Standardized and refined over past 30 years Data: Over 20 years of collection and analysis

Virginia Natural Heritage Plan Governs the creation of a system of natural area preserves 59 Natural Area Preserves (48,032 acres) Establishes priorities for protection, acquisition, and management Calls for a needs assessment to guide expenditures of the Virginia Land Conservation Foundation

Virginia Natural Heritage Plan Spatial tools used for Natural Heritage Plan needs assessment: Element Occurrences - rare plants and animals & exemplary natural communities, based on fine scale vegetation mapping Conservation Sites, Stream Conservation Units, and Cave/Karst Sites - include occurrences plus necessary habitat and buffer Virginia Natural Landscape Assessment - a statewide ecological network with cores and corridors identified and rank by Ecological Integrity Others: Conservation Lands Database, Wetland Restoration Catalog, VCLNA models, Virginia Priority Conservation Sites, predictive distribution models

Coarse Filter/Fine Filter Approaches Coarse filter approaches are designed to conserve high percentages of species by conserving adequate diversity, distribution, and abundance of: ecological communities ecological land units (e.g. alliances of ecological communities) physical environments landscape-level ecological phenomena Fine filter approaches compliment coarse filters by focusing on habitats of individual rare or specialized species

Virginia s Coarse Filter/Fine Filter Approach Fine: Natural Heritage Conservation Sites - polygons that delineate known occurrences of rare species plus required habitat and buffer - biodiversity significance ranked Importance of fine scale approach in realizing advanced mitigation opportunities? - known rare species locations can indicate habitat not captured in existing mapping products (e.g. existing NVCS-based vegetation maps, NWI) - advanced mitigation serving multiple benefits of T&E species conservation

Boundaries that surround: At least one natural heritage resource, and The surrounding habitat or buffer necessary for protection Represent land that should be conserved for protection of natural heritage resources. Do NOT represent protected lands 1,553 plant and animal species and 105 natural community types Conservation Sites

Stream Conservation Units Flag presence of aquatic natural heritage resources Signify that protection of these aquatic elements should be considered 2 miles upstream and 1 mile downstream of documented aquatic natural heritage resources, and all tributaries within this reach

Cave/Karst Sites Boundaries of: At least one natural heritage cave resource, and The surrounding habitat or buffer necessary for protection Represent land that should be conserved for protection of natural heritage resources.

Biodiversity Significance Ranks Rate the significance of conservation sites based on: Number of natural heritage resources contained Global rarity of the species or natural communities contained Viability of the populations or natural communities contained B-ranks B1 Outstanding B2 - Very High B3 High B4 - Moderate B5 - General

Conservation Sites and SCUs Cave Site Conservation Site SCU D.C. COG Region Interstate/Primary Roads (VDOT) LEGEND Interstate Primary US Highway

Conservation Sites by B-rank

Coarse Filter Approaches Coarse filter approaches are designed to conserve high percentages of species by conserving adequate diversity, distribution, and abundance of: ecological communities ecological land units (e.g. alliances of ecological communities) physical environments landscape-level ecological phenomena Conservation Lands database Virginia Natural Landscape Assessment (VaNLA) Wetland Restoration Catalog

Importance of coarse filter approach in realizing advanced mitigation opportunities? Landscape level and mindful of connectivity enables the establishment of area-sensitive species increases diversity in microclimate and microhabitat, and thus the habitat available for diverse species populations provides a population source for surrounding patch habitats that are subjected to more disturbances strengthens metapopulation dynamics by: - decreasing chance of local extinctions in smaller, unprotected,unmanaged areas - increasing rates of colonization or surrounding patches Function!

Conservation Lands Interstate/Primary Roads (VDOT) LEGEND Interstate Primary US Highway D.C. COG Region VOF Federal Local Private State

Priority Conservation Sites and SCUs Interstate/Primary Roads (VDOT) LEGEND Interstate Primary US Highway D.C. COG Region PriorityConservationSites_20090109 Biodiversity Conservation Need 1 - Critical 2 3 4 5 - Moderate

Virginia Natural LandScape Assessment (VaNLA) Natural Landscape Block Core CORRIDOR Natural Landscape Block Core Core CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Core Core Corridors are strips of natural Natural cover Cores Landscape that are link areas Blocks cores of and are unfragmented allow slightly animal fragmented movement natural cover and aggregations with seed at and least pollen of 100 cores acres transfer and of contiguous interior between conditions. natural cores. cover. Natural Landscape Block

Virginia Natural LandScape Assessment (VaNLA) Objective - to identify and rank a network of remaining intact natural habitats remaining in Virginia (a.k.a. cores) Cores areas consisting of >= 100 ac. of continuous natural cover

Virginia Natural Landscape Assessment (VaNLA) Ecological Integrity Model - to rank core areas based on their contributions to a functional ecological network Inputs/Methods 53 attributes (e.g. depth of interior habitat, core size, length of interior streams, wetlands abundance and diversity of wetland types, presence of Natural Heritage resources, SWAP SGCN ) Narrowed down to 9 with PCA Cores ranked from general value (green) to outstanding (red) ecological significance

Virginia Natural Landscape Assessment (VaNLA) Ecological Integrity Model Corridors - network connecting highest ranked cores (C1 and C2 cores) for flow and function of ecosystem services

Virginia Natural Heritage Wetland Restoration Catalog Catalog of potential wetland restorations sites, within or adjacent to Natural Heritage Conservation Sites To guide localities and regulatory agencies to appropriate sites for restoration and mitigation activities Methods: -identified conservation sites larger than 500 acres with biodiversity ranks of B-1 (outstanding) to B-3 (high) -Assessed alongside 2002 aerial photography, NWI and other GIS datasets -Delineated prior converted wetland patches occurring on private and public lands -118 suitable candidate sites for restoration Revised this with 2006/7 imagery

Virginia Natural Heritage Wetland Restoration Catalog Upcoming revision: -Beyond-NWI wetland datasets (Natural Heritage communities, DEQ data, historic wetlands maps) -Virginia Conservation Lands -Improved soils data -VaNLA -Predictive distribution models for wetland-dependent species -2009 Imagery -Existing restoration sites -Final product with a goal to identify at least one wetland priority area within each 8 digit HUC watershed in Virginia

Thank You Jason Bulluck Information Manager Virginia DCR Division of Natural Heritage jason.bulluck@dcr.virginia.gov