TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A PUBLIC WORKSHOP INFORMATION APPENDIX B BUSINESS CENTER TECHNICAL REPORTS APPENDIX C CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT/OPPOSITION

Similar documents
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

open public hearing and allow public comment request to continue LPA public hearing to January 16, 2014 at 10:30 am

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6c

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

Warren County/Bowling Green Focus 2030 Comprehensive Plan VOLUME 1 INDEX

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

SUBJECT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AND ADOPTED AMENDMENT CONSENT AGENDA

Urban Planning and Land Use

Intergovermental Coordination

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5I

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Table of Contents. 1. Future Land Use FLU Housing H-1 Goal 1 H-1 Goal 2 H-4

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies

Future Land Use Map. Goal. Monitoring Measures FLU-1

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016

1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida Ph Fax Lic # LC-C ATTACHMENT G.

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

City Of Sparks Planning Commission Item

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #IV.C

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

CHAPTER 2 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

7,600 Residential Units 1,700,000 SF Non-Res 300-Room ALF 300-Room Hotel University School, Park, Civic parcels 1,889 ac flow-way/preservation

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

14. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

The transportation system in a community is an

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

Intents and Purposes of Select Florida Statutes Dealing With Land Use and Development

City of Palm Coast 2035 Comprehensive Plan - Goals, Objectives, and Policies EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

EAST LAKE TARPON COMMUNITY OVERLAY

LAND USE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [L] (EFF. 7/16/90)

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

13. VANDORF-PRESTON LAKE SECONDARY PLAN 13.1 INTRODUCTION

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

future land use element

Chapter 12 GENERAL STRATEGY

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

Goal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land.

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

NEW CASTLE COUNTY S ZONING DISTRICTS

SUMMERSIDE / MT. CARMEL REINVESTMENT CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

VIRGINIA DRIVE SPECIAL PLAN

Municipal Plan*Assessment

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chapter 3. Community Vision and Goals

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 3.

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

Staff Report and Recommendation

Steering Committee Meeting

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Future Land Use and Transportation

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County Florida

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS RCTOD REZONE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION... 1 MAP SERIES... 2 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TRANSITION OVERLAY DISTRICT... 7 FINDINGS OF FACT.15 CONCURRENCY SUMMARY REPORT... 16 APPENDIX A PUBLIC WORKSHOP INFORMATION APPENDIX B BUSINESS CENTER TECHNICAL REPORTS APPENDIX C CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT/OPPOSITION APPENDIX D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION

RCTOD REZONE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION Rezone Petition No. 10-03 is a publicly initiated rezone to expand the boundaries of the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District on the Zoning Atlas, consistent with the March 20, 2007, recommendation of the Englewood Community Redevelopment Area Advisory Board at the joint meeting with the Sarasota County Commission. If approved, the Englewood Town Center would include the following RCTOD area: Approximately 18.5 acres located north of W. Wentworth Street, and west of North Elm Street. 1

Map Series 2

3

4

5

6

RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TRANSITION OVERLAY DISTRICT INTENT Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District The intention of this County-initiated Application is intended to encourage a live-work environment which promotes redevelopment activity, protect the existing neighborhoods and strengthens the economic development climate. Englewood has many artists that wish to create an artist s community similar to Towles Court which is located near downtown Sarasota. It is the intent of the Residential/Commercial Transition Overlay District, to encourage activities such as home-based office, art galleries, artist studios, and bed and breakfast establishments, as well as low-intensity office, professional and institutional uses. The standards were designed to permit and encourage the coordinated development of mixed land uses and activities in a concentrated area to attract both residents and visitors. Internal sidewalks and pathways are encouraged between separate activities or establishments. The mixed use component will allow office spaces in residences and residential dwellings above or behind shops. Additionally, this district was intended to create a stable edge along the boundaries of an existing commercial area by encouraging the preservation and enhancement of existing housing, including historic structures, and by allowing the provision of new housing, office, galleries, artist studios, and bed and breakfasts. Per the recommendations of the Englewood CRA, the County is processing Rezone Petition No 10-03 to apply the (Residential, Commercial Transition Overlay District (RCTOD) which is the implementing overlay district for the LOAOD designation, to those properties within the expanded Town Center area. This petition is for that overlay district. Both the Rezone petition and the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Town Center expansion will be heard by the Sarasota County Commission on the same date. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING As the map series shows the Englewood Town Center area is within the urban area, is fully developed and is a target area for redevelopment and infill. Nearby, there is commercial zoning and existing commercial uses all along the West Dearborn Street frontage both north and south, and along Indiana Avenue within the Englewood Town Center. Additionally, all the parcels immediately to the west of Expansion Area #1 have the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay (RCTOD) district created to allow more mixed-uses, and economic development opportunities associated with the RCTOD. Proposed expansion Area #1 is residential in character (as shown on page 5 of the map series), with all the parcels zoned either Residential Single Family-3 (four and a half dwelling units per acre), and Residential Multifamily-1 (six dwelling units per acre). 7

HISTORY AND CONTEXT 1997 Englewood Town Center Revitalization Plan The Sarasota County Commission adopted the Englewood Town Center Revitalization Plan (the Plan ) in 1997 by Ordinance No. 97-015. This revitalization plan was developed with significant community involvement. The purpose of the revitalization plan is to promote revitalization and redevelopment activity within the Englewood Town Center. A statement of intent of the Englewood Revitalization Plan, directed Sarasota County staff to establish a Community Redevelopment Agency ( CRA ) as authorized under Florida State Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III ( Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 ). There continues to be clear support for County and community initiatives to stimulate redevelopment in Englewood. In 2000, the Englewood Community Redevelopment Agency ( Englewood CRA ) citizen s advisory committee was formed to oversee the implementation of the Plan and work with the community to promote redevelopment in the Englewood area. The Plan, which was adopted in 1997, designated properties along Old Englewood Road north of West Dearborn Street as Light Office/Arts Overlay District (LOAOD). The intention of the designation was to allow a live/work environment, similar to Towles Court in the City of Sarasota and Village of the Arts in Bradenton. The Arts Office Overlay District was created and added to the Zoning Ordinance in 2002 as the implementing zoning district. When the County updated the Zoning Ordinance in 2004, the zoning district s name was changed to Residential- Commercial Transition Overlay District (RCTOD). The Englewood community has many artists and artisans that wish to establish a similar area to help revitalize the area by providing added interest to the business sector and a transition between the downtown and residential areas. 2007-2008 Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District Expansion Phase I: To protect the existing residents and residential character of the neighborhoods, the community requested that certain uses be prohibited in Englewood that were previously allowed in the RCTOD (health club or spa, gymnastics facility and hair or nail service) and they also wanted a mandatory residential component so the area does not become businesses only, as what occurred in Towles Court in the City of Sarasota. On August 27, 2008, Ordinance 2008-077 was approved by the Sarasota County Commission applying the first RCTOD area within Englewood. The initial expansion of the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District included rezoning of various properties in Englewood near the downtown along West Dearborn Street (approximately 51.47 acres) which began as a grass-roots effort in 2005 by a group of local artists. The Englewood community wanted to apply the RCTOD to encourage a mix of uses to properties near Dearborn Street. The idea was supported by the Englewood CRA Advisory Board, the Chamber of Commerce and the Olde Englewood Village Association. The local community requested that the County process the rezone petition and expand the area designated in the Revitalization Plan. As part of the 2006/07 update to the Englewood CRA Redevelopment Plan effort, the community encouraged the County to apply the RCTOD. As with all overlay districts, the RCTOD was applied to the existing underlying zoning district, which in Rezone Petition No. 08-05 included RSF-3, RMF-1, RMF-4 and RMH. 8

2009 2010 Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District Expansion Phase II: The community requested that the RCTOD be able to be applied to a larger area than what was recommended in the Englewood Town Center Revitalization Plan. This request prompted the need to amend the Sarasota County Future Land Use Map (expand the Englewood Town Center boundaries). The rezoning of properties that currently lie outside the Englewood Town Center boundaries could not occur until the Future Land Use Map is amended. Once the Future Land Use Map amendment is approved, the County will process another rezone petition to apply the RCTOD to those properties within this expanded Town Center area. As part of the 2010-01 Cycle of Comprehensive Plan Amendments, on November 17, 2009 the Sarasota County Commission authorized transmittal to DCA for Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-01-H which proposed the expansion of the Englewood Town Center boundaries on the Comprehensive Plan s Future Land Use Map, to include approximately 18.5 acres (Northern Addition) east of North Elm Street and north of W. Wentworth Street. By expanding the boundaries of the Englewood Town Center, this Comprehensive Plan amendment would allow these properties to be designated Light Office Arts Overlay District (LOAOD) on the Englewood Future Land Use Plan map (as shown on page 4 of the map series), and subsequently rezoned with the RCTOD. This petition is for that RCTOD expansion. NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOPS The Englewood CRA has had ongoing discussions with the community regarding changes to the Englewood Town Center Revitalization Plan and the expansion of the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District. For the 2010 cycle of County initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments, three neighborhood workshops were held. The first neighborhood workshop was held in the Englewood Recreational Center, 101 N. Orange St., Englewood, Fl on March 25, 2009 with approximately 20 attendees; the second neighborhood workshop was held in the County Building, ITC Office and Warehouse, 1001 Sarasota Center Blvd. Sarasota, FL on March 26, 2009; and a third neighborhood workshop was held at 1660 Ringling on June 2, 2009. At the March 25, 2009 Workshop for CPA 2010-01-H, numerous residents residing in Expansion Area #1 expressed their desire to see the expansion area approved, so they could operate small home-based businesses allowed under the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District (RCTOD). There were approximately a dozen comment cards with residents expressing their support. No one in attendance expressed any opposition to the Englewood Town Center Expansion. The comments cards summary can be found in Appendix A of this report. At the January 19, 2010 Neighborhood Workshop for Rezone Petition No. 10-03, there was only one resident in attendance. This was ostensibly because the neighborhood residents were aware of this workshop being the final workshop and had already expressed their support at the previous workshop for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Englewood Town Center. 9

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW Future Land Use The boundaries of the Englewood Town Center and the Nokomis and Osprey Village Centers have been delineated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map since 1996. There are several Future Land Use Policies which provide for additional development intensities and densities within designated town and village centers as part of an adopted critical area plan. As noted in the support text for the Future Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, The County recognizes the importance of fostering redevelopment efforts as a means of capitalizing on existing infrastructure and underutilized properties, improving our neighborhoods, as well as expanding the County s tax base. Future Land Use Policy 3.2.7 states, Commercial development may be permitted in Future Land Use Map designated Town and Village Centers outside the areas designated on the Future Land Use Map for commercial uses only upon adoption of the relevant Town or Village Center Plan. Expanding the Englewood Town Center boundary, with the Light Office/Arts Overlay on the Town Center Future Land Use Plan, Figure 1, is required to allow the Residential Commercial Office Overlay District and subsequent light office/arts uses. This expansion is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 3.2.7, which states, Commercial development may be permitted in Future Land Use Map designated Town and Village Centers outside the areas designated on the Future Land Use Map for commercial uses only upon adoption of the relevant Town or Village Center Plan. The Future Land Use map designates Expansion Area #1 as Moderate Density and Medium Density Residential which does not allow commercial uses. Expanding the town center boundaries will allow the LOAOD designation to be applied to the expansion area, and the subsequent small-businesses to be located in Expansion Area #1. Future Land Use Objective 4.1, Smart Growth, encourages redevelopment opportunities, utilizing smart growth principles, to transform underutilized properties and/or properties struggling with economic viability into developments that sustain and improve the economy, community, and environment. The expansion of the Town Center Boundary will allow a greater opportunity to utilize smart growth principles, such as a more walkable community enabling transformation, and redevelopment of under-utilized properties. Future Land Use Policy 4.1.1 regarding smart growth principles further states principles to attaining smart growth including several which will be utilized in the Englewood expansion areas such as Providing a mix of compatible uses and activities Creating walkable communities where employees live and work in the same building Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place Protect and enhance existing neighborhoods Preserve open space, natural beauty, and environmental areas Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration on development decisions Several of the smart growth principles above are applicable to this Amendment. The existing residential character of the neighborhoods where the Overlay District is to be applied will be protected by the provisions of the zoning district and the added Conditions for Development Approval contained in the Town Center Plan; the area s proximity to the downtown provides supporting synergy between the uses; and the Application is an ideal cooperative public-private collaborative venture. Additionally, FLU Policy 4.2.1 states that the smart growth principles and 10

incentives for redevelopment shall be implemented through zoning regulations, land development regulations, planning programs and processes, and community collaboration and awareness. One of the ways to implement this policy is through the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District designation of the Sarasota County Zoning Ordinance allowed under the Englewood Town Center Future Land Use Plan s Light Office Arts Overlay District. Fostering redevelopment is also an important subject for Sarasota County in order to implement Smart Growth Principles. The expansion would allow mixed-use development with some mandatory residential components through the RCTOD implementation mechanism, by allowing smart growth, mixed-use principles into the future in compliance with Future Land Use Goal 5 by helping to ensure that the County s planning programs meet the varied planning needs of the community. Further, Future Land Use Future Land Use Policies 3.2.7 and 5.1.3 are applicable to this request. The existing character of the neighborhood where the Light Office/Arts Overlay District will further be strengthened as part of the CRA Strategic Initiatives Planning Program. The expansion will allow a larger area for the local artisan community and others, to continue to grow and become a possible destination location for the local community and surrounding areas. TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW The subject of this petition is a ±18.5 acres parcels located adjacent to the area designated as the Englewood Town Center Revitalization Plan. The Applicant is proposing to rezone the parcels from Residential Single Family (RSF-3)/Residential MultiFamily 1(RSF-1) to Residential Single Family (RSF-3)/Residential MultiFamily 1(RSF-1) with a Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District (RCTOD). SUBJECT AREA ROADWAY CONDITIONS The subject parcels have access to Old Englewood Road via Yale Street and S.R. 776 via Wentworth Street. Old Englewood Road is designated as a two-lane minor arterial road from S.R. 776 to Dearborn Street. S.R. 776 is designated as a four-lane major arterial road from Overbrook Drive to Dearborn Street in the Sarasota County 2025 Future Thoroughfare Plan. 11

ROADWAY SEGMENT Right-of-Way (feet) Surface Type Pavement Width (feet) # Lanes Lane Width (feet) Condition Last Resurfaced Drainage (open/closed) Posted Speed Limit Yale Street Old Englewood Road to ELM Street 40-50 Asphalt 18 2 9 Good 2000 Open 30 Wentworth Street ELM Street to S.R. 776 20-60 Asphalt 18 2 9 Excellent 2007 Open 30 Old Englewood Road S.R. 776 to Dearborn Street 58-83 Asphalt 24 2 12 Fair 1987 Open 35 S.R. 776 Overbrook Drive to Dearborn Street 102-120 Asphalt 70 4 11 NA NA Close 45 SOURCE: Sarasota County Roadway Inventory, aerial photos with half section overlays, and/or site visit ACCESS TO SUBJECT PARCEL ROADWAY TYPE OF ACCESS COMMENTS Yale Street Unrestricted None. Wentworth Street Unrestricted None. Old Englewood Road Unrestricted Access to Old Englewood Road is via Yale Street. S.R. 776 Unrestricted Access to S.R. 776 is via Wentworth Street RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDS None. TRIP GENERATION There is no trip generation for RCTOD in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); Therefore, Staff assumed Specialty Retail and Light Office land uses of 1,000 square feet per acre to evaluate the proposed change to the future land use 12

Reference Key Line 1 Line 2 Trip Generation Scenario Current Use Current Zoning Land Use ITE LUC Number of Units Unit Type Gross Trips Daily PM Peak Percent Primary Primary Trips Daily PM Peak Residential 210 35 du 335 35 100% 335 35 Residential 210 19 ac 794 84 100% 794 84 Line 3 Proposed Use Proposed Use Residential 210 35 du 335 35 100% Office/Retail 710/814 18,500 sf 597 83 73% 752 96 Line 4 Proposed Zoning Residential 210 19 ac 794 35 100% 794 35 Line 5 Zoning Impact (Line 4 minus Line 2) 0-49 Line 6 Concurrency Impact (Line 4 minus Line 1) 459 0 Line 7 Impact of Proposed Use (Line 3 minus Line 1) 417 61 Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 8th Ed. CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS ROADWAY SEGMENT Existing PM Peak Trips LOS 1 Vested Trips 2 Existing + Vested PM Peak Trips LOS 1 Project Trips 3 Existing+Vested+ Project PM Peak Trips LOS 1 A D O P T E D L O S Old Englewood Bay Vista Boulevard to Dearborn Street 223 A 7 230 A 61 291 A C S.R. 776 Englewood Isle Parkway to Dearborn Street 1. Based on generalized level of service analysis. 2. Vested trips may include an assumed 3% average growth rate, plus any known vested trips. 3. Based on a distribution of Line 7 PM Peak trips from the Trip Generation Table above. 2,327 A 70 2397 A 61 2458 A D RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS None from Transportation Planning 13

Conclusion As stated in the analysis for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA 2010-01-H, the proposed expansion to the Englewood Town Center and the subsequent expansion of the Residential Commercial Transition Overlay District is consistent with and furthers the applicable Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan. 14

FINDINGS OF FACTS FOR REZONE PETITION NO. 10-03 1. The proposed change would be consistent with the intent, goals, objectives, policies, guiding principles and programs of the Comprehensive Plan; 2. The proposed change would be compatible with the existing land use pattern and designated future land uses; 3. The proposed change would have an impact on the availability of adequate public facilities consistent with the level of service standards adopted in the comprehensive plan, and as defined and implemented through the Sarasota County Concurrency Management System Regulations, Chapter 94, Article VII of Exhibit A of the Sarasota County Code, as amended; 4. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change; 5. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; 6. The proposed change will not create a drainage problem; 7. There are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accord with existing zoning; 8. It is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use; 9. Whether the gradual and ordered growth contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan can be best accomplished through the approval of a land use which is less intense than the intensity designated on the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan; 10. The proposed change would not create adverse impacts in the adjacent area or the County in general; 11. The subject parcel is of adequate shape and size to accommodate the proposed change; 12. Ingress and egress to the subject parcel and internal circulation would not adversely affect traffic flow, safety or control; and 13. The proposed change has been reviewed in accordance with the interlocal agreement with the School Board of Sarasota County and whether school capacity has been adequately addressed, including on- and off-site improvements. 15

CONCURRENCY SUMMARY REPORT Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.3180, Florida Statutes, Sarasota County staff have determined the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-01-H and has determined that the proposed expansion of the Englewood Town Center boundary is consistent with state concurrency requirements of Chapter 163.3180, F.S. Facility Type Concurrent Applicable Level of Service Policy(ies) Parks Yes Parks 1.1.1., Parks Policy 1.1.2 Roads Yes Tran Policy 1.3.2., Tran Policy 1.3.3 Mass Transit n/a Not Applicable Stormwater Yes Water Policy 2.3.2 Solid Waste Yes Public Policy 4.4.1. Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Yes Water Policy 3.5.4. Yes Water Policy 1.5.3. Schools Yes CIP Policy 1.5.1 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY REPORT Note: Pursuant to Chapter 163.3164(32), A comprehensive plan shall be deemed financially feasible for transportation and school facilities throughout the planning period addressed by the capital improvements schedule if it can be demonstrated that the level-of-service standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the planning period even if in a particular year such improvements are not concurrent as required by s. 163.3180. Sarasota County staff has reviewed proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-01-H and has determined that the proposed expansion of the Englewood Town Center boundary is consistent with Chapter 163.3164, Florida Statutes. This was approved for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs, and is being reviewed. 16

APPENDIX A PUBLIC WORKSHOP INFORMATION

APPENDIX A PUBLIC WORKSHOP INFORMATION

A-1

A-2

A-3

A-4

A-5

A-6

A-7

A-8

A-9

A-10

APPENDIX B CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT/OPPOSITION None

APPENDIX C GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES The following Primary Components of the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan are applicable to this petition. Environment Plan ENV Goal 2 Protect and enhance wherever possible, the quality of the estuarine environment throughout Sarasota County. ENV Objective 2.1 Improve surface water quality including estuarine, freshwater, coastal streams, rivers, and bays, including the Myakka River and its tributaries. ENV Policy 2.1.5. Monitoring surface water quality during the development activities of projects of significant impact as determined by Water Resources. This program, in conjunction with the NPDES permit program, will facilitate the monitoring of cumulative impacts of development on stormwater runoff and water quality. ENV Goal 4 Protect, maintain, and, where necessary, restore the natural resources of Sarasota County to ensure their continued high quality and critical value to the quality of life in the County. ENV Objective 4.3 Protect and conserve surface and groundwater resources. ENV Policy 4.3.2. Sarasota County will coordinate with other governmental and private entities to protect water resources. Watershed Management Plan WATER Goal 2 Sarasota County shall provide programs which prevent and mitigate the losses, cost, and human suffering caused by flooding; protect natural and beneficial functions of the floodplain; protect water quality by preventing further degradation of the water resources; enhance water quality where appropriate; enhance, protect and conserve the hydrologic and ecological functions of natural systems including estuaries, freshwater and groundwater systems; and ensure safe, efficient, economical, and sustainable water supplies that provides customers the appropriate water quality for the intended use. WATER Objective 2.2. Protect the functions of natural groundwater recharge areas and natural drainage features by providing for the maintenance of existing, and where feasible the restoration of the pre-development, water budgets to historical watercourses (as identified by the original United States General Land Office Township Plats from the Mid to Late 1800 s). WATER Policy 2.2.2. The County shall require that the treatment of stormwater discharge meet standards which will ensure that there will not be adverse impacts on the quality of natural surface waters. WATER Policy 2.2.3. New development in the 100-year floodplains shall be consistent with all other Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan. C-1

FLU Policy 2.2.2. Public expenditures for infrastructure and services shall be concentrated to serve the areas within the Urban Service Boundary, as designated on the Future Land Use Map. FLU Policy 2.2.3. Future Land Use Map designations that permit Low, Moderate, Medium and High Density Residential, Major Employment Centers, Light Office Development, Office/Multi-Family Residential, Commercial Centers, Commercial Corridors, and Commercial Highway Interchange uses shall be limited to the Urban Service Area. Such uses, however, are allowed outside the Urban Service Area consistent with an adopted Master Plan approved pursuant to the Sarasota 2050 Plan. Major Employment Center designated on the Future Land Use Map outside the Urban Service Boundary shall be continued. FLU Objective 2.3. Ensure that sufficient acreage is available to accommodate the sustainable projected population growth and financially feasible infrastructure for the ten year period following adoption of each Evaluation and Appraisal Report required pursuant to Chapter 9J-5.0053 F.A.C. FLU Policy 2.3.4. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide for the future use of land in Sarasota County and contemplates a gradual and ordered growth. The Future Land Use Map establishes a long-range maximum limit on the possible intensity of land use; it does not simultaneously establish an immediate minimum limit. The present use of land may, by the adopted Zoning Atlas, continue to be more limited than the future use designated on the Future Land Use Map. FLU Policy 2.3.5. The Sarasota County Zoning Ordinance shall continue to set forth a hierarchy of zoning districts and associated buffering / open space requirements, based on the density and intensity of permitted uses, for the purpose of establishing appropriate development ratio standards commensurate with the parcel size and compatibility with adjacent uses. Capital Improvements Plan CIP Goal 1 The County shall provide and maintain, in a timely and efficient manner, adequate public facilities for both existing and future populations, consistent with available and projected future financial resources. CIP Policy 1.2.1 The availability of public facilities shall be determined and measured for the required public facility types using the following Level of Service (LOS) Policies contained in the following Chapters of the Comprehensive Plan: Transportation Policies 1.3.1., 1.3.2., 1.3.3., and 1.3.4. of the Transportation Plan; Solid Waste Policy 4.4.1. of the Public Buildings and Related Facilities Plan; Stormwater Management - Policy 2.3.2. of the Watershed Management Plan; Sanitary Sewer Policy 1.5.3. of the Watershed Management Plan; Potable Water Policy 3.5.4. of the Watershed Management Plan; Parks and Recreation Policies 1.1.1., 1.1.3., and 1.1.4. of the Parks and Recreation Plan; and Public Transit Policy 2.1.10. of the Transportation Plan. CIP Policy 1.3.2 Continue the implementation of the Park Impact Fee System (Chapter 70, Article V. Park Impact Fee of the Sarasota County Code), to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of park capital facility capacity needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. CIP Policy 1.3.3 Continue the implementation of the Water and Wastewater Capacity Fee Systems (Chapter 70, Article VI. C-2

WATER Objective 2.3. Ensure that development and redevelopment provides for adequate stormwater management. WATER Policy 2.3.2. Stormwater Level of Service: 1. Stormwater Quality: no discharge from any stormwater facility shall cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards in waters of the State as provided for in County Ordinances. 2. Stormwater Quantity: Stormwater management systems shall provide for adequate control of stormwater runoff. Transportation Plan TRAN Goal 1 It shall be the Goal of Sarasota County to develop and maintain a safe, convenient, efficient transportation system which: recognizes present need; reflects the Future Land Use Plan and the plans of adjacent jurisdictions; provides for an affordable balance of alternative transportation modes; provides for safe, efficient intermodal transportation linkages; and respects the integrity of environmentally sensitive areas and wildlife habitat. TRAN Policy 1.3.1. Sarasota County shall use the best available data, and use professionally accepted practices, in the development of its Level of Service analysis methodology, procedures, and assumptions in analyzing existing and future levels of service on those roadways subject to the County's Concurrency Management System Regulations. TRAN Policy 1.3.7. Maintain provisions in the Sarasota County Land Development Regulations and the Sarasota County Zoning Ordinance to ensure safe internal travel and parking of motorized and non motorized vehicles. Future Land Use FLU Policy 1.1.6. No development order shall be issued which would permit development in 100 year floodplains, as designated on Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps or adopted County flood studies, or on floodplain associated soils, defined as Soils of Coastal Islands, Soils of the Hammocks, Soils of Depressions and Sloughs, and Soils of the Floodplains and shown in Figure 2-2, that would adversely affect the function of the floodplains or that would degrade the water quality of water bodies associated with said floodplains in violation of any local, State, or federal regulation, including water quality regulations. FLU Objective 1.2. Protect the quality and integrity of established residential neighborhoods from adjacent incompatible development. FLU Policy 1.2.1. Potential incompatibilities between land uses due to the density, intensity, character or type of use proposed, shall be mitigated through site and architectural design techniques including but not limited to any or all of the following: provision and location of open space, perimeter buffers, landscaping and berms; the location and screening of sources of light, noise, mechanical equipment, refuse areas, delivery areas and storage areas; the location of road access to minimize adverse impacts, increased building setbacks, step downs in building heights; and increased lot sizes; and lower density or intensity of land use C-3

Water Capacity Fee and Article VII. Wastewater Capacity Fee of the Sarasota County Code) to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of the water and wastewater capital facility capacity needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. CIP Policy 1.3.4 Continue the implementation of the Emergency Medical Service Impact Fee System (Chapter 110, Article XII. Emergency Medical Services District)) to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of the emergency medical service capital facility capacity needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. CIP Policy 1.3.5 Continue the implementation of the Fire and Rescue Impact Fee System (Chapter 110, Article VIII. Fire and Rescue District) to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of new facilities for fire protection services needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. CIP Policy 1.3.6 Continue the implementation of the Library Impact Fee System (Chapter 70, Article II. Library System Impact Fee of the Sarasota County Code) to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of library facility capacity needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. CIP Policy 1.3.7 Continue the implementation of the Educational System Impact Fee System (Chapter 70, Article VIII. Educational System Impact Fee of the Sarasota County Code), to ensure that new development pays a proportionate share of the costs of new educational system projects needed to address the demand for such facilities generated by new development. C-4