Town of Avon Village Center. A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015

Similar documents
Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Planning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

New Town Mixed Use District

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Development Agreement Public Meeting. June 26, 2013

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

appendix and street interface guidelines

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITES

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

The bottom urban structure and guidelines City Council Briefing

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

Exhibit Planning and Design Workshop February 3-6, Commissioned by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC)

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Overview of the Plan. The Building Blocks of Centers, Neighborhoods and Network INTERNAL DRAFT

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Community Design Plan

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Derry Green Corporate Business Park

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

A Healthy Future Walkability Through Community Design. Fit Families North Carolina October 18, 2004

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

Welcome! to Keller Town Hall

Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

THE CIVIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Elizabeth Ackerman Architect LLC/LEED AP PO Box 382 Lambertville, NJ

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

NATICK COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN. Natick Center Outreach Meeting. After presentations about the Natick Master Plan process, town staff and

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

Neighborhood Districts

Design Guidelines. Gardnerville Plan for Prosperity

7Page 72 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 5 DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

Description of Preferred Alternative

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

3. Project Description

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Tom Patterson Theatre Technical Review Plans received October 2017

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

W O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y

HE VISION. Building a Better Connected Place

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Transcription:

Town of Avon Village Center A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015

A busy Avon Center approx. 1940

The Avon Town Center Study: In 2004 the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) undertook the Avon Center Study as part of the required Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD) update. This study was given high importance by the PZC. The study area designated centered on the Route 10/ Route 44 intersection, approximately.4 miles N/S and.3 miles E/W. The land covered by this study area is largely privately owned but includes the Avon Town office buildings and the present Avon Town green.

Avon Center Study Area Map (insert here)

Major Issues addressed in the Avon Center Study: Create: A Center Identity. A much stronger Sense of Place More Pedestrian-friendly spaces using landscaping/ street furniture/ proper lighting and street trees. Improved pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the area. Improved road circulation and connections with primary and secondary roads. Additional needed housing. And acknowledging the viability of existing residential neighborhoods. And examining the future use of the Towpath School property. Today the Town Center is less identifiable as a traditional village center as a result of Route 44 widening and historic development patterns.

The New Town Center Vision: The 2004-2005 study identified several significant issues including: Center is not fully integrated as a traditional New England Village. Center has been diluted by other site development along Route 44. Concentration is needed. Niche retail & services are needed. Land use mix not optimized. Need adequate sidewalks and pedestrian connections to encourage walking. Unifying elements missing: Lighting, sidewalks, benches, trees. (Signage) No adequate pedestrian connections to nearby residential areas. Traffic speed is too fast for a Town/Village Center. Not enough traffic/people stop to shop or get services in existing Town Center.

General Town Center Study Recommendations: Improve vehicle and pedestrian Circulation Create an Avon Town Center Overlay Zone which should include: Reduce setbacks, to zero in some cases. Increase lot coverage. Reduce parking demands. Increase the public gathering areas, landscaped gardens, seating areas, public art or recreational spaces. Mix of uses including housing. Design Guidelines for building and landscaping. Use of Special Permit process.

Specific Recommendations: (15/17addressed) Thematic lighting Sidewalks/Bicycle Routes Secondary Road System Landscaping infill along streets Farmington Valley Trail Greenway Towpath School Site Crosswalks Seating Signage ZONING: Create an Avon Center Overlay Zone Parking (evaluation of supply/ shared/ and needs) Retain Institutional Uses to add/ encourage pedestrian use Add bus Stops Add housing Building Architecture Underground utilities Resolve Enford Street Alignment issue

Architectural Recommendations of 2005 Study: Employ 2 and 3 story buildings Improve storefront transparency Require high architectural standards and materials. Avoid sterile, stereotypical or trademark architecture Break down building masses. Avoid large unarticulated masses. Include elements such as canopies, stairs, columns, projections, and human scale recesses. Signs to complement architecture Create public gathering places within larger developments. Optimize signage, conceal garage doors. Encourage front and rear entrances to buildings.

Historically: The 2004-2005 Center Study was adopted as Appendix A to the 2006 POCD. NOTE: New 2016 POCD continues this effort. Historically the property was zoned and used for heavy industrial purposes as part of the Climax Fuse Company and subsequently the Ensign-Bickford Company. Zones were Industrial, Industrial Park and Commercial Park A. Also historically Avon Town Center has been served by the intersection of State Highway Route 44 also known as Main Street and Route 10 also known as Simsbury Road. In the 1830 s this area of the major intersection was known as East Avon and was a popular location for many commercial activities such as hotels, dry goods stores, taverns, warehouses, a cobbler shop, blacksmith shop, a distillery, several mills and mail distribution. The Church was also located there along with the Canal Office.

Avon Center Study Plan/ Implementation In 2012 the Avon Planning Commission upon application from Ensign Bickford Realty Corporation as owner/developer, adopted a new Master Plan for the 97 acres of property known as Avon Park North. This land is located in close proximity to the northwest corner of the Route 44/10 intersection, the historic center of Avon Village, and was privately owned by Ensign-Bickford Co. The property is approximately bounded by Fisher Drive on the north, Climax Road on the west, Simsbury Road on the east and Route 44 on the south.

Insert adopted 2012 map here

2012 Plan contents: 418 units of smaller housing 264,830 square feet of commercial retail development 186,273 square feet of office development 23 acres of Open Space/Town Park Plus Greenway/bike trail/ Pedestrian walkways Farmington Valley Arts Center and most extg businesses to remain 1,155,363 square feet total development

Carpionato Plan submissions and Commission responses: 1. Initial submission, July 2015 2. Revised submissions 3. Peer Review Architect Union Studio recommendations 4. Composite response plans 5. Commission decision, November 20, 2015

First submission map

Union Studio Recommendations

Third revision/ action

2015 Plan contents: 400-415 units of housing (same) 519,670 vs. 264,830 square feet of comm retail dev. (+254,840) 45,230 vs. 186,273 square feet of office dev. (-141,043) 23 acres of Open Space/Town Park (same but w/new, upgraded facilities) Plus Greenway/bike trail/ Pedestrian walkways (enhanced facilities) Farmington Valley Arts Center and most all extg businesses to remain (same) 1,232, 277 vs. 1,155,363 square feet total development (+76,914)

Fiscal Impact Report: Net Fiscal Impact resulting from Development Residential Commercial Combined Total Revenue $1,715,076 $3,921,943 $5,637,020 Service Costs $953,432 $1,262,647 $2,216,080 School Costs $434,139 $0. $434,139 Net Annual Fiscal Impact $327,504 $2,659,295 $2,986,800 Source: Mullin Associates Inc. September, 2015

Quick $ background: Avon Grand List Components: $2,708,176,170 1. Residential:.78.3%* 2. Commercial/Industrial/Pub. Util:.11.8%** 3. Motor Vehicle:.6.3% 4. Personal:.3.4% 5. Other:...0.2%

Questions/ Issues/Concerns: Infrastructure: Roads, Sewer, Water, Electricity, Gas, Communications. Public/Private partnership High Quality Architecture: All buildings design, construction, energy, sustainability, resilience. Walkability and interconnectedness improved. Possible transit connection Arts included in approval consideration Continuity of ownership going forward Impact on Community: Business community: Additional critical mass, additional services, less reason to travel. Residential Community: Additional local services, decreased amount of tax increases. Greater level of economic development capture.

A New Village Center for Avon 2016-2020 Questions, Please.