Penn State Wi W lkes-barre ilkes-barre Campus Exterior Architectural Plan Spring 2010

Similar documents
York. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan. November 2006

Penn State P Dubois Campus Exterior Architectural Plan October

Worthington Scranton. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

Penn State. Harrisburg. The Capital College. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

Be P ave Beav enn State r er Campus Exterior Architectural Plan Spring 2010

Mont Alto. Penn State

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

EXISTING CONDITIONS 41. Existing Conditions

EXISTING VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY GROUNDS MANAGEMENT PLAN FY 2013

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Town Center Design Guidelines

14.0 BUILT FORM DESIGN CRITERIA

Indiana University Campus Division. A brief description of the Division that makes Indiana University a beautiful place to be

Building and Site Design Standards

SOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Setting a Direction for Schematic Design

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

Assessment of the Extent and Quality of the Landscape Features of the Campus.

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Steering Committee Meeting. July 29, 2014 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Hidden Pointe Landscape Master Plan. June, archi terra

THE LANDMARK PROJECT: ST. GEORGE CAMPUS BEFORE AND AFTER

ANCHORAGE PARK REPORT CARD Assessing A Park s Appearance, Function, & Condition

Learning in the Landscape

RHBL 7325 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS. By: Whitney Musick

Landscaping And Site Details

Ohlone College Measure G Project Scope Revisions

GREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Seattle Children s Major Institution Master Plan. Approved May 7, 2010

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

THE LANDSCAPING CHECKLIST

City of Aurora Planning Department DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING STATION. August 3, 1998

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

Community Design Plan

Improve the appearance of off-street parking areas, vehicular use areas, and property abutting public and private roads;

PART I-D BUFFERS AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

master plan hodge park

PUBLIC FRONTAGE REGULATIONS MAP

Antelope Valley College

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development

for Master Planned Development Framework Design Standards & Guidelines

\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan. Design Guidelines

Landscape Design Guidelines

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

campus master plan VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

theme 4 : Penn connects...

Sign System Recommendations

City of Sheridan Landscape Plan Checklist

ACADEMY AREA CONCEPT PLAN

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT SAMARITAN SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE AT OSU 10/21/2013

Design Guidelines: Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program

PALO ALTO HIGH SCHOOL Palo Alto Unified School District MEETING NOTES. DATE: 21 September Palo Alto HS Update

STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Acting Planning and Capital Program Director

Erie. The Behrend College. Penn State. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

Charles P. Johnson and Associates. Annapolis Landscape Architects

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Reynoldsburg Major Commercial Corridors Streetscape and Development Design Guidelines/Standards. Development Design Guidelines/Standards

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES/STORMWATER PONDS - What Are They?

SECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

Subcampus Recommendations

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Benches Trash & Recycling Containers Railings and Bullrail Edges Paving Planting Pier Apron Lighting Interpretive Signage

Moreno Valley College: Conceptual Master Planning - Site Analysis Lasselle Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92551

Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

Landscape and fencing requirements of this Chapter shall apply to all new landscaped areas.

CENTRAL PARK LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

Littleton Fields Master Plan

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Preliminary Sketch Plan for Fort Hunter Park

ART AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD (AARB) Project Data Sheet Revised 2014 (Due two weeks before meeting to:

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h C a r o l i n a A i k e n. Land Plan Study

VILLAGE OF HUNTLEY COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

AESTHETIC APPEARANCE. Design Guidelines for Grade-Separated Pedestrian, Cyclist and Equestrian Structures

Transcription:

Penn State Spring 2010

Introduction and Purpose Contents Existing Conditions Inventory Improvement Recommendations 1 ARCHITECTURE A Demolish Inspector s House B Assess Hayfi eld House Balcony C Hayfi eld House Entrance D Screen Utilities E Science Building Entrance 2 SITE FURNISHINGS A Site Furnishings B Hayfi eld House Front Patio Furnishings 3 LIGHTING A Lighting 4 LANDSCAPE A Plant Along Drainageway B Remove Volleyball Sandpit C Maintain and Interpret Stacked Stone Walls D Replace Industrial Gate E Commons Building Entrance Plaza F Plant Slope at Gym Entrance G Shade Trees at Large Expanses of Building H Remove Seating Areas I Remove Putting Green J Remove Outdoor Postboards K Student Services Landscaping L Sidewalk Realignments and Pavement Reduction M Gazebo Landscaping N Replace Stairs from Parking O New Sidewalk P Bell Atlantic Building Lighting and Landscaping Q Screen Maintenance Areas R Establish a Campus Tree Program

Introduction and purpose Penn State s Mission: Penn State is a multi-campus public land-grant university that improves the lives of the people of Pennsylvania, the nation, and the world through integrated, high-quality programs in teaching, research, and service. To assist in achieving this mission, a Campus Exterior Architecture Plan, known as a CEAP, is developed to suggest ways to improve the exterior aesthetic qualities of campus with low-cost and easy-to-implement concepts that can have meaningful impacts. The CEAP is a planning tool that is an outgrowth of the campus master planning process. The CEAP includes graphic and narrative descriptions of existing conditions on campus and approximately 15-20 improvement concepts. Positive features may also be identifi ed as elements to emulate. The improvement concepts are ranked or prioritized according to their visual impact and estimated cost. The concepts are not fi nal designs. Further study and design are required prior to implementation.

Existing Conditions Inventory Background: A walking tour focused on assessment of the campus exterior established the foundation for the recommendations and concepts contained in this CEAP document. General Observations: Since the mid 1960 s, Penn State has been located on the former estate of coal baron John N. Conyngham II in Lehman Township, thirteen miles from. Signifi cant architecture and landscape elements remain from the original 1930 s era construction. The heart of the campus is Hayfi eld House, a stone mansion sited at the high point of surrounding rolling hills. The campus contains fi ne examples of dry-laid stone stacked walls and 15 acres of arboretum remnants. There is not an interior campus green - open lawn areas are outward-facing, probably as was the fashion when the estate was developed, taking advantage of long views from Hayfi eld House. University Drive is a strong central vehicular artery into the core of campus, as defi ned by Hayfi eld House and the new Nesbitt Academic Commons. An opportunity exists to strengthen the visual entrance sequence into campus along this drive and to redefi ne this corridor as a pedestrian zone. Most of campus parking is relegated to the campus perimeter and along entrance drives. Parking is also available in the enclosed courtyard at Hayfi eld House. Pedestrian circulation in the campus core is functional, although opportunities exist to better defi ne pedestrian-only pathways. Existing exterior gathering spaces can be enhanced to be more inviting. Upgraded signage and wayfi nding for the campus has been developed and implemented.

Architecture Existing Conditions Inventory Major architectural modifi cations, additions, and new construction are beyond the scope of this CEAP. However, the aesthetic character of campus is defi ned to a great extent by the structures that comprise it. Stone masonry is the predominant building material of most buildings on campus.

Site Furnishings Existing Conditions Inventory Benches, trash receptacles, tables and bike racks across the campus are varied in design, color and material. It is recommended that a standard design for furnishings be selected that will aid in unifying the campus aesthetic. In addition to aesthetic appropriateness, the longevity and maintenance of site furnishings should be considered when specifying.

Landscape Existing Conditions Inventory The landscape aesthetic of the campus can be characterized as park-like with the remnant woodland in the center of campus and large open grassy lawns on the periphery. A swale passes through campus between two wetland areas. Remnant stacked stone walls evoke the campus gentlemen s farm past. Turf areas appear to be weed-free and well maintained. Any and all invasive plant species should be eradicated. Some trees appear stressed. Both formal and informal outdoor gathering spaces exist on campus though there is opportunity for more.

Pedestrian Circulation Existing Conditions Inventory Some redundancies exist in the current network of sidewalks on campus. The use of concrete in lieu of asphalt for walkway surfacing is recommended.

Unique Features Existing Conditions Inventory The character and aesthetic of the campus is dominated by the historic 1930 s era Hayfi eld House and associated landscape remnants. The campus landscape is punctuated by fi ne examples of dry-laid stacked stone walls.

Improvement Concepts The following figures describe and illustrate possible solutions to specific aesthetic and functional shortcomings on campus, most of which are addressable through the CEAP program. In addition to the recommendations that follow, there are routine maintenance tasks that will enhance the aesthetic appeal of campus. Suggestions include: Mulch landscape beds annually Eradicate weeds and other invasive vegetation Fertilize lawn areas Focus the use of annual and perennial plantings Re-seed lawn areas abutting sidewalks killed by deicing chemicals Seal and re-stripe paved areas Tree pruning and maintenance as recommended by University arborist An implementation priority matrix has been prepared that lists improvement projects and recommends the order in which the concepts/projects could be executed. The implementation ranking is intended as a guideline for realizing the most significant impacts early in the plan implementation. Location specific concepts/projects are keyed to the map with numbers corresponding to the listing on the matrix at the end of this report.

1A Demolish Inspector s House Improvement Recommendation The ramshackle Inspector s House is an attractive nuisance that should be demolished and cleared.

Assess Hayfield House Balcony Improvement Recommendation1B Assess Hayfi eld House balcony for structural integrity and complete any suggested improvements. Trim of Hayfi eld House needs repainted.

Hayfield House Entrance Improvement Recommendation1C Replace the industrial doors on Hayfi eld House with more architecturally appropriate choices. All doors on the same planar surface should match. Directories for interior spaces should be located inside the building. Existing Existing Proposed Proposed

1D Screen Utilities Improvement Recommendation Opportunities exist across campus to screen utility equipment from view. Supplemental landscape plantings will not only obscure views but will add interest and beauty to the campus. An effort should be made to avoid soldiering screening plants around these fixtures, which can draw even more attention to the problem.

Science Building Entrance Improvement Recommendation1E The entrances to the Science Building should be enhanced to convey a more welcoming feeling. This is the point where students, faculty, staff, and visitors are in closest contact with the campus architecture. Possible treatments include powerwashing of concrete facades, planters, new lighting, new campus standard furnishings, and complimentary landscaping. Existing Proposed

2A Site Furnishings Improvement Recommendation Site furnishings designed in a style family are aesthetically unifying. A simple, classic design that can work with both the historic and contemporary buildings on campus should be chosen. Powder coated metal is attractive, comfortable and durable. Planters should be appropriately sized for the space they occupy and be constructed of durable, quality material. Beaver

2B Hayfield House Front Patio Furnishings Improvement Recommendation Furnish the front patio of Hayfi eld House with appropriately sized tables and chairs. Wrought iron would be an historicallyappropriate material.

3A Lighting Improvement Recommendation A variety of exterior light fi xture types are present on campus. As with site furnishings, it is recommended that design standards for parking lot/roadway and pedestrian site lighting be identifi ed and implemented across campus. Full Cut-off luminaires that mitigate light pollution should be used. Metal Halide lamps on pedestrian walkways is recommended. Site Lights Parking Lot Light Beaver

4A Plant Along Drainageway Improvement Recommendation Treat the drainageway between the two designated wetland areas on campus as a part of that wetland system. Ornamental native plantings will beautify this landscape element, reduce the grass-cutting burden, and promote Penn State s commitment to environmentally sustainable landscape practices.

Remove Volleyball Sandpit Improvement Recommendation4B Remove little-used and poorly-placed sand volleyball pit and replace with turf.

Maintain and Interpret Stacked Improvement Stone Walls Recommendation4C Great care should be taken to maintain the stacked stone walls - a unique feature at the campus. The Dry Stone Conservancy is a non-profi t organization promoting the craft of dry stone masonry and can be a resource for maintenance information (http://www.drystone.org/) An opportuntiy exists to encourage a deeper understanding and connection to this campus through signs at Hayfi eld House and the stone walls to interpret the evocative story of the campus history.

Replace Industrial Improvement Recommendation4D Gate Replace industrial metal gate in stacked stone wall along University Drive with wooden gate to better complement the historical site feature. Existing Proposed

4E Commons Building new campus standard benches new campus standard table & chairs planted pots Commons Building Entrance Plaza Improvement Recommendation The Commons Building is the primary gathering spot for students, despite the tired condition of the front entry plaza. This new plaza design will provide a more functional layout with new furnishings and walkways. It is aligned with architectural elements of this historic stone building. Existing Woodland Remove redundant and confusing path The walkway that leads from the Commons Building entrance through the plaza will continue across University Drive on a raised table to connect to the Multipurpose Building entrance walk. This traffic-calming device will signal that this is a pedestrian zone. A non-functioning turnaround in front of the contemporary Multipurpose Building will be removed. Hedging will align with the front of the Commons Building to encourage the sense that the new plaza, the street, and the opposite side of University Drive is a pedestrian zone. Hedges will also screen the view of parked cars from University Drive. A redundant walkway that is currently mistaken for a vehicular road will be removed and replaced with turf. Raised Table Landscaping is primarily low maintenance shrubs and groundcovers to keep the visual focus on the building. Landscape color will be restricted to planters. An improved pedestrian-scaled lighting scheme is also included in the design. Remove turnaround - replace with connecting walkway, turf, trees and hedging Existing 0 10 20 30 Multipurpose Building Proposed

Plant Slope at Gym Entrance Improvement Recommendation 4F The planting bed at the University Drive entrance to the Multi-purpose Building is too steep for mowing and should, therefore be planted with low shrubs and groundcover for ease of maintenance. Suggested groundcover: Bearberry (Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi) Existing Proposed

Shade Trees at Large Expanses Improvement of Building Recommendation4G Long unbroken expanses of building frontages appear harsh. Plant appropriately sized shade and evergreen trees along the west sides of the Athletic & Recreation Building and the Murphy Student Services Center to mitigate.

Remove Seating Areas Improvement Recommendation4H Seating areas along University Drive appear random in the landscape and residential in nature. Remove and replace with turf.

4I Remove Putting Green Improvement Recommendation If the small putting green in the lawn south of Hayfi eld House is not in use it should be removed.

4J Remove Outdoor Postboards Improvement Recommendation The rustic character of lumber and shingle style exterior post boards is not compatible with the image of quality and permanence of a Penn State campus. Management of content is often irregular or inconsistent. Space for managed posting of relevant notices should be limited to interior locations in common areas of buildings. It is recommended that the existing exterior post boards be removed from campus.

4K groundcover hedge Student Services Building Small ornamental trees Student Services Landscaping Improvement Recommendation The entrance to the Student Services Building appears barren. Remove existing concrete seat and pavers, and plant trees, hedges, and groundccover as shown to create a more inviting entrance. New benches, trash receptacle, and planter complete the treatment. Shade tree Shade trees Existing Existing Proposed Proposed

4L Sidewalk Realignments & Pavement Reduction Improvement Recommendation Move Conyngham Lane to align with the center of Student Services Hayfi eld House. Proposed alignment also removes sidewalk redundancy in front of Nesbitt Academic Commons. Provide concrete sidewalk connection to CONYNGHAM LANE LANE gazebo and pond. Pavement reduction and a new concrete sidewalk connection from parking to Hayfi eld House creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment. Several options are proposed for the parking spaces Nesbitt Academic Commons AM LANE Arboretum Proposed alignment Existing alignment Pavement reduction Commons Building between the Commons Building and Hayfi eld House. This option would improve the line of sight into campus when approaching on University Drive, but would not address the safety concern for pedestrians walking behind parked cars. UNIVERSITY DRIVE Parking shifted and new sidewalk Existing alignment Hayfi eld House Existing alignment New sidewalk to gazebo and pond Gazebo Back of Hayfield House View from University Drive Pond

LANE Student Services 4L Sidewalk Realignments & Pavement Reduction Improvement Recommendation This alignment allows for pedestrian movement on a dedicated sidewalk. The visual clutter of parked cars is also reduced for visitors on University Drive. Hedging or trees can be planted in the strip between the sidewalk and UNiversity Drive to camoflauge the parked cars. CONYNGHAM HAM LANE LANE E Arboretum Nesbitt Academic Commons Proposed alignment Existing alignment Commons Building Pavement reduction UNIVERSITY DRIVE Parking shifted and new sidewalk Existing alignment Hayfi eld House Existing alignment New sidewalk to gazebo and pond Gazebo Pond

4L Sidewalk Realignments & Pavement Reduction Improvement Recommendation In this layout, parking is removed entirely from this stretch Student Services of University Drive. This optoin has the biggest visual impact on the pedestrian feel of the campus core. The resulting distance to campus center: ~790 Existing distance from North Lot to center of campus: 927 CONYNGHAM HAM LANE LANE E Main parking to center of campus other campuses: Nesbitt Academic Commons LANE Woods Proposed alignment Existing alignment Pavement reduction Commons Building Altoona: 734 Berks: 451 Brandywine: 876 Fayette: 326 Beaver: 798 UNIVERSITY DRIVE Hazleton: 988 Mont Alto: 860 Parking removed Existing alignment Hayfi eld House Existing alignment New sidewalk to gazebo and pond Gazebo Pond

4M Gazebo Landscaping Improvement Recommendation Plant shrubs and groundcover at Gazebo. Maintain an open view to the pond.

Replace Stairs from Parking Improvement Recommendation4N The timber and asphalt stairs from the north parking lot appear temporary. Replace with concrete stairs which will be safer and easier to maintain in the winter.

New Sidewalk Improvement Recommendation4O A new sidewalk is required to accommodate pedestrian movement from the parking lot to the Science Building. Service Drive Bell Atlantic / Bell of PA Building Nittany Drive New Sidewalk Science Building

4P Bell Atlantic Building Lighting and Landscaping Improvement Recommendation Replace awkward and inappropriate light fi xtures with campus standards, as shown. Hedging, shade and ornamental trees, groundcover, and site furnishings present a more welcoming fi nish to the Bell Atlantic Building. Existing Proposed

4Q Screen Maintenance Areas Improvement Recommendation Screen maintenance areas from view with evergreen trees and shrubs. The woody debris that is discarded in the maintenance area next to the Commons Building should be chipped, composted, and used for landscaping. Contact the University Park Central Support Services Supervisor for information on composting. Existing Existing Proposed Proposed

Establish a Campus Improvement Recommendation4R Tree Program Establish a database accounting of campus trees to ensure a net gain of signifi cant trees over time. A campus inventory should include a ranking of value to encourage appropriate replacements for lost specimens when opportunities arise for new installations. Diseased and/or dying trees should be pruned or removed and trunks should be ground or removed to avoid the perception that campus trees are in decline.

NORTH PENN STATE WILKES BARRE INDEX CAMPUS BUILDINGS PARKING Blue Student/Faculty/Staff/Visitor Yellow Student/Faculty/Staff White Faculty/Staff Only Green Faculty/Staff Only Red Faculty/Staff Only VP Visitor Parking All parking by permit only 10 S E R V I C E D R I V E 5 4 3 2 14 7 11 N I T T A N Y D R I V E C O N Y N G H A M L A N E 12 15 Nittany Lion 9 8 T O W N S H I P R O A D 7 9 5 YOU HERE ARE 13 Welcome to Penn State 6 C O M M 1 O N S L A N E U N I V E R S I T Y D R I V E Faculty/Staff Only VP L I O N L A N E LEGEND Academic/Classroom Buildings Support Services Emergency Phone Barrier-free Entrance Barrier-free Entrance w/ Power Assist 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Athletic & Recreation Building Gym Nurse Bell Atlantic/Bell of PA Building Computer Lab Fortinsky Auditorium Classroom/Laboratory Unit A Classroom/Office Unit B Classroom/Office Unit C Commons Building Bookstore Cafeteria Nittany Room The Carriage Room The Lion s Den Friedman Observatory Gazebo Hayfield House Academic Affairs Business Services Chancellor s Office Continuing Education Development Financial Aid Police Services Maintenance Building Murphy Student Services Center Academic Advising Admissions Career Services Financial Aid Learning Center Registrar SSS Nesbitt Academic Commons Barry Auditorium Friedman Art Gallery Nesbitt Library 13. Rave Family Pond 14. Science Building Bierly Auditorium 15. Water Storage Tower

Penn State Beaver Project Prioritization Matrix Monday, February 01, 2010 Proposed exterior improvement projects have been assessed with respect to the following criteria and assigned an implementation priority value. Criteria include: Visual Impact - degree to which the project improves the visual quality of the campus Cost - level of capital investment required to implement the project (assumes no volunteer or donor contribution) PENN STATE WILKES BA The projects with the highest numeric score should be given the highest priority for implementation VISUAL IMPACT COST 1 - Little or no impact 1 - Greater than $25,000 2 - Minor Impact 2 - $15,001 to $25,000 3 - Moderate Impact 3 - $5,001 to $15,000 4 - Major Impact # PROJECT IMPACT COST SCORE 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4Q 4P N I T T A N Y D R I V E T O W N S H I P R O A D 7 9 5 4C 1A Demolish Inspector's House X X 6 1B Assess Hayfield House Balcony X X 5 1C Hayfield House Entrance X X 5 1D Screen Utilities X X 6 1E Science Building Entrance X X 6 S E R V I C E D R I V E 4N 4O 4Q C O M M O N S L A 1A 4D U N I V E R S I T Y D R I V E 2A Site Furnishings X X 6 2B Hayfield House Front Patio Furnishings X X 6 3A Lighting X X 4 4A Plant Along Drainageway X X 5 4B Remove Volleyball Sandpit X X 7 4C Maintain and Interpret Stacked Stone Walls X X 4 4D Replace Industrial Gate X X 7 4E Commons Building Entrance Plaza X X 5 4F Plant Slope at Gym Entrance X X 7 4G Shade Trees at Large Expanses of Building X X 5 4H Remove Seating Areas X X 7 4I Remove Putting Green X X 6 4J Remove Outdoor Postboards X X 6 4K Student Services Landscaping X X 6 4L Sidewalk Realignments and Pavement Reduction X X 5 4M Gazebo Landscaping X X 7 4N Replace Stairs from Parking X X 5 4O New Sidewalk X X 6 4P Bell Atlantic Lighting and Landscaping X X 6 4Q Screen Maintenance Areas X X 6 4R Establish a Campus Tree Program X X 6 1E 4J 4G C O N Y N G H A M L A N E 4K 4R 4H 4L 1B 1D 1C 2B 4I 4L 4L 4M 4C 4E 4F 4G N E 4B 4A Note: Cost ranges identified in this matrix are for planning purposes only. Actual costs will be dependent upon fully developed plans for the respective project. Some of the projects listed above can be broken down into smaller pieces and implemented in phases.