Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Cherry rootstocks. Sara Pinczon du Sel, La Tapy Gérard Charlot, Ctifl

Similar documents
Small volume : Spanish bush, KGB, drilling

New training systems to improve the profitability of cherry orchards. Gérard Charlot, Ctifl (France)

High-density training systems

Cherry rootstock on-going breeding program throughout the world

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Experiences with different cherry rootstocks in Belgium. J. Vercammen Proeftuin pit- en steenfruit (pps)

Prof. Dr. Károly Hrotkó. SZIU Faculty of Horticultural Science

Sweet cherry rootstocks

dr. Nikita FAJT, Erika KOMEL COST FA1104-WG2/Trebinje, February, 2015

Sweet cherry production in Portugal. Berta Gonçalves

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

Sweet cherry rootstocks for Región of Murcia.

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Sweet Cherry. Wednesday afternoon 2:00 pm

ISHS International Cherry Symposium 2013

ACHIEVEMENTS IN HIGH DENSITY CHERRY ORCHARD SYSTEMS IN HUNGARY

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

The introduction of dwarfing cherry rootstocks, such as

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

Intensive Orchard Systems for High Quality, High Efficiency Sweet Cherry Production

WSHA 110th Annual Meeting and Trade Show December 2 nd, Cherry shows a great climate adaptability

Tree Fruit for the Home Gardener

Initial growth and fruiting of Summit sweet cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks

Effect of Several Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of Sunburst Sweet Cherry

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

Horticulture Department

2/18/2009. Do you have: Time Space Expertise Realistic expectations. Teryl R. Roper Dept. of Horticulture University of Wisconsin-Madison

In the case of intensive production systems, the objective is to use a rootstock that restricts tree vigour, induces early cropping is precocious and

Why Grow Fruit or Berries in Your Backyard?

Grafting Fruit Trees. Loyd Collett 4/5/2011 1

Getting fruit trees off to a good start. Bill Shane Tree Fruit Extension Specialist SW Michigan Research and Extension Center, Benton Harbor, MI

Propagating Fruit Trees

CHERRY. training systems PNW 667. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. L. Long, G. Lang, S. Musacchi, M. Whiting

WALNUT RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY SURVEY -- FRANCE, D. Ramos and J. Doyle

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

Bob Spotts Kelly Wallis Delivered by Lynn Long

COST meeting (WG2) Rootstocks and training system Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, REPORT

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

Pruning and Training. Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

SOME EXPERIENCES OF THE OBLACHINSKA SOUR CHERRY CROWN TRAINING

Propagation techniques in horticulture

FRUIT TREES Selection and Site Preparation. Gary Gorremans WSU Lewis County Master Gardener

Cherry Rootstocks & Scions for the M-F Area Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

TRANSMISSION OF ROSE MOSAIC VIRUSES

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

Rootstock breeding and trialling at EMR. Feli Fernández

Healthy Garden Tips Web site: Telephone: University of California Cooperative Extension Napa County

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

Viticulture - Characteristics of the vine - Rootstocks & Grafting

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Backyard Tree Fruit. Chuck Hoysa Retired Extension Agent Fruit Tree Hobbiest

Available online: Print ISSN X; Electronic

Ann Hazelrigg NE Vegetable and Fruit Conference December 17, MOLD- Managing. Tomato Diseases in Tunnels

Quantifying Limitations to Balanced Cropping

Rootstocks. Rootstocks for intensive pear production. Pear (Pyrus) rootstocks. OHF series

Site Selection Blueberry

Pruning Fruit Trees. Vince Urbina Colorado State Forest Service

FRUIT TREES: CARE AND MAINTENANCE ~ WINTER AND SUMMER PRUNING Charles Davis & Kim McCue, UC Master Gardeners

Bringing modern orchard techniques to Tajikistan

CITRUS PRUNING. Pruning techniques for tree health, pest control, fruit production and size control.

FRUIT CROP PEST UPDATES. Dr. Elina Coneva ACES, Auburn University

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

Small-Scale Cherry Production, Big Time Market Opportunities

Pruning and Training Fruit Trees

What to Consider: Almond Rootstocks. December 6, 2016

Managing Backyard Apples Organically

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

Horticulture 2013 Newsletter No. 11 March 12, 2013

CHALLENGES FOR THE UK STONE FRUIT PRODUCTION

FINAL PROJECT REPORT Project title Organization Contact Administrator CO-PI Cooperators Introduction Objectives

Evaluation of Pyrus and Quince Rootstocks for High Density Pear Orchards

30 YEARS OF INTENSIVE ORCHARD PRODUCTION IN SOUTH TYROL. Extension Service for Fruit and Wine Growing, South Tyrol. Martin Thomann

FRUIT TREES: CARE AND MAINTENANCE ~ WINTER AND SUMMER PRUNING Charles Davis and Kim McCue, UC Master Gardeners

Apple I. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

Peaches. Plums & Apricots. Pears. Cherries. Apples. Poor hardiness Try Contender or Reliance or seedling? Little or no pruning and spraying!

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

Potential Disease Issues in Young Apple Nurseries. Sara M. Villani February 24, 2016 Department of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University

Increasing the growth rate by any means decreases the juvenile period

Deciduous Fruit Trees Fall & Winter Care

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Goals of the Program 4/24/2014

Grafting Morphology and Physiology Text Pages:

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

Best Pruning Practices Fruit Trees and Grapes. David Rice Conservation Programs Coordinator Weber Basin Water Conservancy District

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

GardenNotes #112 Diagnosing Tree Disorders

The Benefits of Trunk Mounding in Honeycrisp Production

Transcription:

Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Cherry rootstocks Sara Pinczon du Sel, La Tapy Gérard Charlot, Ctifl

Context Traditionally, French growers use vase training system with vigourous rootstocks like Sainte-Lucie 64, or semi-dwarfing like Maxma 14. Since several years, a lot of trials have been made on dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstocks, which could be interesting : - to decrease production cost - to reduce time before the first fruiting - to allow rain covering or insectproof nets installation Vase / Sainte-Lucie 64 Rain covering and insect-proof nets

Rootstocks research in France A network : 6 research centers evaluating cherry rootstocks - Ctifl - La Tapy - Sefra (Drôme) - Sefra (Ardèche) - Cefel - Verexal Ctifl 2 levels : Cefel Sefra (Ardèche) Sefra (Drôme) La Tapy - 3 spots in the 1 st level : Ctifl, La Tapy, Sefra (Drôme) - 5 spots in the 2 nd level : La Tapy, Sefra (Drôme), Sefra (Ardèche), Cefel, Verexal Verexal

Rootstocks research in France Observations - Vigor (trunk section area) - Graft union - Root suckering - Anchorage - Foliage - Sensibilities - Root asphyxia - Drought - Bacterial canker - Armillaria root rot - Precocity - Productivity - Fruit size La Tapy - Black cherry aphid - Vole - and so on Exemple of Gisela 6 : difference between the area of the rootstock and the area of the variety La Pugère A vole La Tapy Measure of the circumference, before to estimate the trunk section area

Dwarfing rootstock Tabel Edabriz*, Piku 1*

Tabel Edabriz* Tabel Dwarfing rootstock 20 to 60% of Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) Prunus cerasus Created by Inra/Ctifl, France M14 Low to moderate level of root suckering (depending of the variety) Moderate level of anchorage SL64 Very precocious (producing crops by the 3rd leaf) Very high level of productivity The size of the fruit depends of the level of production. Need to be pruned carefully. wild cherry

Tabel Edabriz* Low level of sensitivity Root asphyxia Lack of magnesium Sensitive to Drought : sensitive to very sensitive Chlorosis : very sensitive PDV virus : very sensitive Armillaria root rot Black cherry aphid Low to moderate sensitivity to bacterial canker La Tapy Foliage Medium foliage status (symtoms of chlorosis ) Vole La Pugère

Tabel Edabriz* Known in France since the beginning of the 1980s. Used as control in dwarfing rootstock trial. One of the most dwarfing rootstock in France. Very precocious. High productivity. Need to be properly pruned in order to maintain fruit size. Need good soils and irrigation. Sensitive to every kind of stress : drought, vole, aphid

Vigor (% of Tabel or M14) Piku 1* 00 50 00 50 00 50 0 Tabel M14 88 SL64 240 Ctifl Burlat 40 300 250 200 150 100 Sefra 50 Dwarfing rootstock 80 to 120% of Tabel Edabriz (depending of soils and varieties) 58 0 % Tabel % M14 88 46 Ctifl Example Observations 2010 Trial planted in 2001 240 58 Sefra Prunus avium x (Prunus canescens L. x Prunus tomentosa L.) 300 250 200 % Tabel 150 % M14 100 50 0 130 Created by Dresden-Pillnitz station, Germany 1st level from 2000 to 2010 / 2 nd level since 2012 160 125 141 Cefel Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Cefel Ctifl La Tapy Sefra 293 Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2012 143 Example 182 191 wild cherry Burlat Burlat Earlise

Piku 1* Piku 1 Tabel Low level of suckering Anchorage better than Tabel Edabriz Burlat / Piku 1 2 years old Ctifl Burlat / 3 years old Ctifl

Low level of sensitivity Root asphyxia Drought Chlorosis PDV and PNRSV virus (Lankes C., 2007) Piku 1* Light sensitivity to lack of magnesium Foliage Foliage status better than Tabel Edabriz

Cumulative production (kg / tree) Fruit weight in 2015 (gr) Piku 1* Very precocious High productivity Size of the fruit better or similar to Tabel 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2012 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Cefel Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Cefel Ctifl La Tapy Sefra 0 Burlat Earlise Piku 1 - cumulative production Tabel - cumulative production Piku 1 - fruit weight Tabel - fruit weight

Piku 1* Trials are still in progress on this rootstock in France. Vigor similar to Tabel Edabriz. Very precocious, similar to Tabel Edabriz. High productivity, similar to Tabel Edabriz. But the size of the fruit on trees grafted on Piku 1 seems to be better than on trees grafted on Tabel Edabriz. Low level of root suckering (better than Tabel). Anchorage better than Tabel Edabriz. Better foliage status than Tabel Edabriz and seems to be less sensitive than Tabel Edabriz.

Semi-dwarfing rootstock Weiroot 158*, Gisela 6*, Ceravium PHL-A*, Furtos, Krimsk 5*, Krimsk 7*, Maxma Delbard 14 Brokforest*

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Weiroot 158* Tabel Prunus cerasus (P. cerasus x P. avium?) Created by the university Monaco Freising Weihenstephan, Germany 1st level from 1995 to 2005 / 2 nd level since 2007 Semi-dwarfing rootstock 40 to 80% of Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) M14 SL64 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 18 74 48 31 46 39 82 45 40 56 60 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 25 68 0 wild cherry Folfer Poisdel

Example - Poisdel - 6 years old La Tapy Weiroot 158 Maxma 14

Example Ctifl

Averagr number of root suckers per tree No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel Weiroot 158* Low to moderate level of root suckering. Seems to be more sensitive to root suckering than Tabel Edabriz. 14 12 10 8 W158 M14 Tabel 6 4 2 0 Ctifl La Tapy 1 0 0 0 0 0 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Folfer Anchorage better than Tabel Edabriz but worse than Maxma 14. Good graft union. Poisdel Ctifl

Weiroot 158* Variable foliage status : medium to good. High death rate have been observed in a plot in Vaucluse (60 to 80% death), probably caused by root asphyxia. Low level of sensitivity Bacterial canker Lack of magnesium Sensitive to Root asphyxia : very sensitive Drought : sensitive Vole : sensitive to very sensitive La Pugère

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Cumulative production (kg / tree) Fruit weight in 2015 (gr) Weiroot 158* Precocious. Good productivity. Good fruit size. 250 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 14 200 150 100 50 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 Folfer Poisdel W158 - cumulative production M14 - cumulative production W158 - fruit weight 2015 M14 - fruit weight 2015 W158 - fruit weight 2014 M14 - fruit weight 2014

Weiroot 158* Trials are still in progress in France. Vigor between Tabel Edabriz and Maxma 14. Good behaviour in good soil without root asphyxia : good balance between the production and the size of the fruit But seems to be very sensitive to root asphyxia, vole Good behaviour in good soil, but need to avoid root asphyxia, vole

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Tabel Gisela 6* Prunus cerasus «Schattenmorelle» x Prunus canescens Created by the university Justus Liebig of Giessen, Germany 1st level from 1999 to 2010 / 2 nd level since 2007 M14 Semi-dwarfing rootstock 50 to 80% of Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) 120 100 80 114 108 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 92 SL64 60 40 20 24 40 32 52 36 36 43 60 43 58 0 wild cherry Folfer Poisdel

Example - Folfer - 4 years old Ctifl Gisela 6 Maxma 14

Example - Poisdel - 6 years old La Tapy Gisela 6 Maxma 14

Averagr number of root suckers per tree No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel Gisela 6* No root suckering. 14 12 10 Gis.6 M14 Tabel 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Folfer Gisela 6 don t have a good anchorage. Poisdel Graft union with a difference between the diameter of the rootstock and the diameter of the variety. Ctifl

Low level of sensitivity PDV and PNRSV virus (Howell, W.E., Lang, G.A., 2001) Gisela 6* Medium to poor foliage status : the worst one in the study. Low sensitive to chlorosis Sensitive to Bacterial canker : sentitive to very sensitive Armillaria Root rot High temperatures in summer time Double fruit Moderate sensitivity to Root asphyxia Lack of magnesium Vole

Gisela 6* Gisela 6 seems to induce a higher sensitivity to double fruit. Percentage of double fruit on Folfer in La Tapy in 2013 % of double fruit Maxma 14 3.5% Gisela 6 25.3% Furtos 0.3% Weïroot 158 13.5% PHL-A 0.5% Tabel Edabriz 15.8% Ctifl

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Cumulative production (kg / tree) Fruit weight in 2015 (gr) Gisela 6* Very precocious. High productivity, similar to Tabel Edabriz. Need to be prune carefully. 250 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 14 200 150 100 50 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 Folfer Poisdel Gis.6 - cumulative production M14 - cumulative production Gis.6 - fruit weight 2015 M14 - fruit weight 2015 Gis.6 - fruit weight 2014 M14 - fruit weight 2014

Gisela 6* Trials are still in progress in France. Vigor between Tabel Edabriz and Maxma 14. Very precocious. High productivity. Need to be properly pruned in order to maintain fruit size. Be careful of the conditions before to plant it : - Sensitive to bacterial canker - It can induce a bad foliage status in bad soil, wtih productive varieties - Seems to be sensitive to high temperature in summer Interesting only in good soil, and not with varieties with a high level of productivity

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Tabel Ceravium PHL-A* Prunus avium x Prunus cerasus Created by Holovousy station, Czech Republic 1st level from 1996 to 2010 / 2 nd level since 2007 Semi-dwarfing rootstock 60 to 90% of Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) M14 180 160 140 159 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 SL64 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 62 78 24 70 39 100 97 34 52 77 42 121 wild cherry Folfer Poisdel

Example - Folfer - 6 years old La Tapy Maxma 14 PHL-A

Example - Poisdel - 7 years old Ctifl PHL-A Maxma 14

Example - Summit - 13 years old Ctifl Tabel PHL-A

Averagr number of root suckers per tree No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel Ceravium PHL-A* Low to moderate level of root suckering. More sensitive to root suckering than Tabel Edabriz. 14 12 10 8 PHLA M14 Tabel 6 4 2 0 Ctifl La Tapy 1 0 0 0 0 0 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Folfer Average to good anchorage. Poisdel Ctifl

Ceravium PHL-A* Medium to good foliage status Low level of sensitivity PDV and PNRSV virus (Howell, W.E., Lang, G.A., 2001) Sensitive to Lack of magnesium : more sensitive than Maxma 14 Moderate sensitivity to Chlorosis

Cefel 1 Cefel 2 Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Ctifl La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Cumulative production (kg / tree) Fruit weight in 2015 (gr) Ceravium PHL-A* Precocious. Good productivity. Good fruit size. 250 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 14 200 150 100 50 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 Folfer Poisdel PHLA - cumulative production M14 - cumulative production PHLA - fruit weight 2015 M14 - fruit weight 2015 PHLA - fruit weight 2014 M14 - fruit weight 2014

Ceravium PHL-A* Trials are still in progress in France. Vigor between Tabel Edabriz and Maxma 14. Precicity near to Maxma 14 Productivity and fruit size near to Maxma 14. Compared to Tabel Edabriz, can be planted in medium quality soil and less sensitive to virus and black cherry aphid Better than Gisela 6 in medium quality soil

Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Furtos Tabel Prunus cerasus Sour cherry variety named Ujfehertoi Fürtös, identified by Ujfeherto station, Hungary 1st level from 1991 to 2003 / 2 nd level since 2003 M14 Semi-dwarfing rootstock 50 to 100% of Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) 160 140 120 100 137 112 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 SL64 80 60 40 20 59 28 72 35 34 53 58 58 84 wild cherry 0 Cefel 1 Cefel 2 La Tapy 1 Folfer La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Poisdel Sefra Verexal

Example - Poisdel - 6 years old La Tapyl Maxma 14 Furtos

Example - Burlat - 8 years old - rich soil Ctifl Furtos Maxma 14

Example - Burlat - 10 years old - poor soil Ctifl Maxma 14 Furtos

Averagr number of root suckers per tree No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel No trees on Tabel Furtos Low to moderate level of root suckering. Less sensitive than Gisela 6 and PHL-A, but more than Gisela 6. 14 12 10 Furtos M14 Tabel 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal Folfer Good anchorage. Good graft union. Poisdel Ctifl

Furtos Always an healthy vegetation, similar to Maxma 14. The best vegetation in bad soil : Furtos always have an healvy vegetation, even if it allow to reduce the vigor in bad soil. Low level of sensitivity Root asphyxia Chlorosis

Cumulative production (kg / tree) Fruit weight in 2015 (gr) Furtos Precocious. Good productivity. Good fruit size. 250 Example Observations 2015 Trial planted in 2007 14 200 150 100 50 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Cefel 1 Cefel 2 La Tapy 1 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal La Tapy 1 La Tapy 2 La Tapy 3 Sefra Verexal 0 Folfer Poisdel Furtos - cumulative production M14 - cumulative production Furtos - fruit weight 2015 M14 - fruit weight 2015 Furtos - fruit weight 2014 M14 - fruit weight 2014

Furtos Well known in France (trials since 1991). Vigor between Tabel Edabriz and Maxma 14 : more vigorous in good soils (near to Maxma 14), less vigourous in bad soil. Even when Furtos is less vigorous, its vegetation remains very healthy. Most of the time, the productivity is higher than Maxma14 (7 times out of 14), and the average fruit weight is the same or higher than Maxma 14. Interresting in bad soil condition, in order to reduce vigor and keep an healphy vegetation

Semi-dwarfing rootstocks Trials planted in 2007 Furtos Gisela 6 PHL-A Weiroot 158 Vigor between Tabel and M14 50 to 100% of M14 between Tabel and M14 50 to 80% of M14 between Tabel and M14 60 to 90% of M14 between Tabel and M14 40 to 80% of M14 Sensitivity sensitive to double fruit? sensitive to root asphyxia (Gordes) and voles (Marsillargues) Foliage healthy vegetation, similar to M14 medium to poor foliage status medium to good foliage status medium to good foliage status Graft union diameter of the variety larger than diameter of the rootstock Root suckeers average sensitvity to root suckers low sensitivity to root suckers more sensitive than Maxma 14 to root suckers more sensitive than Maxma 14 to root suckers First fruiting early first fruiting Cumulative productivity pretty low productivity (like M14 or a little better) high productivity (like Tabel Edabriz) pretty low productivity (like M14 or a little better) pretty high productivity (better than M14) Fruit size from average to good size of the fruit small fruit (need to be prune carrefully) from average to good size of the fruit from average to good size of the fruit

Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Krimsk 5* Tabel Prunus fruiticosa x P. lannesiana Origin : Russia M14 SL64 Semi-dwarfing rootstock seems to be similar to Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) 140 120 100 80 60 40 92 88 114 89 54 78 111 119 Example Observations 2014 Trial planted in 2011 98 20 wild cherry 0 Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Belge Ferdiva Grace Star

Averagr number of root suckers per tree No trees on Maxma 14 No trees on Maxma 14 Krimsk 5* Studied in France since 2003 (1st level of research) : a first trial was planted in 2003 and a second in 2011. Trials are still in progress in France. Vigor similar to M14 Very sensitive to root suckering Most of the time, an healphy vegetation have been observed. Krimsk 5 had produce more than Krimsk 7 in 2015. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 K5 M14 Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Burlat Observations 2011 Trial planted in 2003 Fermina Example

Vigor (% of Maxma 14) Krimsk 7* Origin : Russia Tabel M14 Semi-dwarfing rootstock seems to be less vigorous than Maxma 14 (depending of soils and varieties) 140 120 100 80 94 99 94 115 Example Observations 2014 Trial planted in 2011 83 SL64 60 40 55 40 69 40 20 wild cherry 0 Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Ctifl La Tapy Sefra Belge Ferdiva Grace Star

Krimsk 7* Studied in France since 2011 (1st level of research) : first fruits have just been observed! Trials are still in progress in France. Seems to be a little less vigorous than Maxma 14. Seems to be less sensitive to root suckering than Krimsk 5. Most of the time, an healphy vegetation have been observed. Krimsk 7 had produce less than Krimsk 5 and Maxma 14 in 2015.

Maxma Delbard 14 Brokforest* Tabel Prunus mahaleb x Prunus avium Created by Lyle Brooks, Oregon, USA Rootstock planted in France since 20 years : 30 to 40% of new plantation are made with this rootstock. M14 SL64 wild cherry Semi-vigorous rootstock 60 to 90% of Sainte-Lucie 64 (depending of soils and varieties) No to low level of root suckering. Very good anchorage. More precocious than Sainte-Lucie 64. Produce more than Sainte-Lucie 64. Fruit weight similar to Sainte-Lucie 64.

Maxma Delbard 14 Brokforest* Low level of sensitivity Chlorosis PDV and PNRSV virus (Howell, W.E., Lang, G.A., 2001) Sensitive to Lack of magnesium : sensitive to very sensitive Moderate sensitivity to Root asphyxia : less sensitive than SL64 Phytophtora Pretty sensitive to Vole Bacterial canker

Vigorous rootstock Sainte-Lucie 64, Maxma Delbard 60 Broksec*, Adara*, GF8-1 + Adara*, Avima Argot, Piku 3*, Monrepos

Sainte-Lucie 64 Tabel Prunus mahaleb Created by Inra, France M14 SL64 Well-known rootstock. One of the most planted in France. Vigorous rootstock 80% of wild cherry (depending of soils and varieties) wild cherry

No root suckering. Very good anchorage. Sainte-Lucie 64 Average precocity : first fruits after 5 to 6 years. Pretty good to good productivity. Good fruit size. Low level of sensitivity Chlorosis Lack of magnesium Bacterial canker PDV and PNRSV virus Pretty tolerant to Drought Sensitive to Phytophtora Very sensitive to Root asphyxia Vole Amillaria root rot

Maxma Delbard 60 Broksec* Tabel Prunus mahaleb x Prunus avium Created by Lyle Brooks, Oregon, USA M14 SL64 Vigorous rootstock 90 to 120% of Sainte-Lucie 64 (depending of soils and varieties) wild cherry

Maxma Delbard 60 Broksec* No to low level of root suckering. Very good anchorage. Average precocity. Pretty good to good productivity. Good fruit size. Low level of sensitivity Pretty tolerant to Drought Chlorosis Phytophtora Root asphyxia PDV and PNRSV virus (G.Lang, W. Howell, 1998) Armillaria root rot

Tabel Adara* Also used between the variety and GF8-1 in plot contaminated by Armillaria root rot. Prunus cerasifera Her. (Myrobolan) Created by Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Spain Plum rootstock which can be used for cherry. Low level of root suckering. Very good anchorage. M14 SL64 wild cherry Average to pretty good precocity, similar to SL64. Pretty good productivity, better than SL64. Good fruit size, similar or better than SL64. Tolerant to root asphyxia, chlorosis, bacterial canker, vole. Vigorous rootstock 100 to 130% of Sainte-Lucie 64 (depending of soils and varieties)

GF8-1 + Adara* Tabel GF8-1 P. Cerasifera x P. munsoniana Created by INRA, France Adara Prunus cerasifera Her. (Myrobolan) Spain High level of root suckering. Average anchorage. M14 Pretty good precocity. Pretty good productivity. Good fruit size. SL64 wild cherry Low sensitivity to Armillaria root rot and bacterial canker. Vigorous rootstock Similar to Sainte-Lucie 64 (depending of soils and varieties)

Avima Argot Tabel Prunus mahaleb x Prunus Avium Created by Pierre Argot, France Trials are still in progress in France. This rootstocks seems to be interesting when vigor is needed. Very low to moderate level of root suckering. Very good anchorage. M14 Precocity sometimes better than SL64. Good productivity (better than SL64). Good fruit size. SL64 wild cherry Pretty tolerant to root asphyxia? Vigorous rootstock 100 to 130% of Sainte-Lucie 64 (depending of soils and varieties)

Piku 3* Tabel Prunus pseudocerasus x (Prunus canescens L. X Prunus Incisa L.) Created by Station of Dresden-Pillnitz, Germany Trials are still in progress in France. This rootstocks seems to be interesting when vigor is needed. Very low level of root suckering. Very good anchorage. M14 Average precocity, similar to SL64. Average productivity, similar to SL64. Good fruit size. SL64 wild cherry Tolerant to drought. Very vigorous rootstock 100 to 120% of wild cherry (depending of soils and varieties)

Monrepos Prunus cerasifera Ehr. (Myrobolan) Tabel M14 SL64 wild cherry Trials planted in 2014 in France. Vigorous rootstock (depending of soils and varieties)

Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Thanks for your attention