NORTH SANTA ROSA STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN

Similar documents
North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

elk grove design guidelines Table Contents

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Niagara Region Official Plan. Table of Contents

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Roosevelt Corridor. R e i n v e s t m e n t P l a n. Public Meeting Gilbert Elementary School May 12, :00 pm

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware

Greenway. Two Rivers. Design Guidelines and Signage Plan. Broome County. Tioga County. Prepared For: The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

W O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y. Community Workshop #1: Visioning September 11th, 2007

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Chapter 1: Introduction

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

Ocala 2035 Vision & Recreation & Parks Master Plan

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE WORKSHOP

11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Research Park

Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Master Plan

Danvers High Street I-1 District Study

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

The University of Vermont #AMPUSª-ASTERª0LAN. & Design Guidelines. May 2006

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Acknowledgments. City of East Peoria. City of Washington. Aldermen. Commissioners. Staff. Staff. Planning Consultant. David Mingus, Mayor

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

Arlington County Retail Plan

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Age Friendly Design ( 2:15 Breakout Session )

City of Burlington Downtown Street Design & Construction Standards

The transportation system in a community is an

Aesthetics and Design

Richmond Road Complete Street Meeting #1, April 25, 2016

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

Route 1 Corridor Study

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Phase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Pine Island Road Corridor Master Plan

Rezoning Frequently Asked Questions

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VILLAGE OF BRIARCLIFF MANOR. September 2007

Integrated Multi Modal Public Transit Hub

2016 Sustainable Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

From: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June 23, 2017

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS VAN NUYS NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, PLUM COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING, CITY OF LOS ANGELES

3 Vision and Goals. Vision and Goals. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Vision. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan,

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

Railroad Safety Trail. Recompiled August Project Description. Prepared For: City of San Luis Obispo

Design Guidelines Strategy

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

This page left intentionally blank.

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

McCowan Precinct Plan Study Background & Deliverables

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Community Workshop. Tuesday, February 15, 2011 New Haven Free Public Library

Aldershot GO Draft Mobility Hub Concepts. East Plains United Church September 13, :30 8:30 pm

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

9/19/2018 TODAY S WEBINAR AGENDA CONTINUING EDUCATION UPCOMING TRAINING FROM APBP

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. Terms of Reference. Purpose. When is an Urban Design Brief Required

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

MOUNT PLEASANT SECONDARY PLAN & VILLAGE BLOCK PLAN. Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Informal Public Open House

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

CITY COUNCIL Arthur C. Brown Mayor Fred Smith Mayor Pro Tem Patsy Marshall Council Member Don McCay Council Member Jim Dow Council Member

Transcription:

NORTH SANTA ROSA STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 18, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1-1 1.1 Specific Plan Area... 1-1 1.2 Background... 1-5 1.3 Purpose of this Plan... 1-5 1.4 Specific Plan requirements... 1-5 1.5 What is Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)?... 1-6 1.6 Relationship to Other Documents... 1-6 1.7 Guiding Project Principles... 1-9 1.8 Planning Process and Outreach... 1-10 1.9 Document Organization... 1-12 2. Existing Conditions & Opportunities... 2-1 2.1 Local Setting... 2-1 2.2 Community Character... 2-5 2.3 Historic Context... 2-5 2.4 Existing Land Use... 2-6 2.5 General Plan Land Use... 2-7 2.6 Circulation Networks... 2-7 2.7 Urban Form & Design... 2-19 2.8 Market Conditions... 2-21 2.9 Opportunities... 2-23 3. Vision... 3-1 3.1 Create an Identity and Sense of Community for the Station Area... 3-2 3.2 Enhance Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Connections throughout the Project Area... 3-4 3.3 Provide Plenty of Safe Outdoor Community Spaces... 3-5 3.4 Incorporate a Variety of Activities and a Mix of Uses... 3-6 3.5 Encourage Economic Development... 3-7 3.6 Promote Sustainability Principles in New Development... 3-8 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4. Land Use Plan... 4-1 4.1 Land Use Classifications... 4-2 4.2 Land Use Mix & Distribution... 4-4 4.3 Development Types... 4-7 4.4 Development Potential... 4-14 4.5 Affordable Housing Strategy... 4-15 4.6 Goals & Policies... 4-15 5. Private Realm Development Standards, Design Guidelines, and Urban Design Policies... 5-1 5.1 Transit-Oriented Development Overview... 5-1 5.2 Development Standards... 5-3 5.3 Design Guidelines... 5-21 5.4 Urban Design and Character Goals and Policies... 5-39 6. Circulation Plan... 6-1 6.1 Circulation System... 6-1 6.2 Street & Path Classification... 6-5 6.3 Pedestrian & Bicycle circulation... 6-7 6.4 Transit... 6-11 6.5 Motor Vehicle Circulation... 6-17 6.6 Parking... 6-26 6.7 Goals & Policies... 6-28 7. Public Realm Design Standards and Guidelines... 7-1 7.1 Street and Path Design Dimensions... 7-2 7.2 Street Design Treatments... 7-7 7.3 Sidewalk Standards... 7-10 7.4 Street Furnishing Guidelines... 7-13 7.5 Pedestrian Crossing Design Standards... 7-22 7.6 Pedestrian/Bicycle Path Design Standards... 7-23 7.7 Public Space Design Guidelines & Policies... 7-24 7.8 Roundabout Design Standards... 7-25 7.9 Wayfinding Strategy... 7-28 ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS 8. Infrastructure & Public Facilities... 8-1 8.1 Utility Infrastructure... 8-2 8.2 Recreation and Parks... 8-5 8.3 Public Safety... 8-6 8.4 Educational/Library and Cultural Facilities... 8-7 8.5 Goals & Policies... 8-8 9. Implementation Plan... 9-1 9.1 Implementation Overview... 9-1 9.2 Implementation Action Plan... 9-4 9.3 Funding & Financing Strategy... 9-7 9.4 Plan Administration... 9-13 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B General Plan Policies Appendix C Affordable Housing Strategy Appendix D Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Phasing LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Total Building Square Feet... 2-7 Table 2.2: Total Residential Units... 2-7 Table 2.4: Multimodal Level of Service (LOS) Comparison... 2-19 Table 4.1: Land Use Classification... 4-2 Table 4.2: Development Type Imagery by Land Use Classification... 4-7 Table 4.3: Development Potential by Land Use Classification... 4-14 Table 5.1: Development Standards for Transit Village Mixed Use... 5-5 Table 5.2: Development Standards for Transit Village Medium... 5-7 Table 5.3: Development Standards for Medium Density Residential... 5-9 Table 5.4: Development Standards for Medium-High Density Residential... 5-11 Table 5.5: Retail and Business Services... 5-13 Table 5.6: Development Standards for Office... 5-15 iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 5.7: Development Standards for Light Industrial... 5-17 Table 5.8: Development Standards for Business Park... 5-19 Table 5.9: Development Standards for Public/Institutional... 5-19 Table 5.10: Design Guidelines... 5-22 Table 5.11: Frontage Type Imagery... 5-37 Table 7.1: Street and Path Design Dimensions by Street Type... 7-2 Table 7.2: Street Design Standards and Guidelines... 7-5 Table 7.3: Sidewalk Standards by Zone... 7-10 Table 7.4: Street Furnishing Types & Guidelines... 7-12 Table 7.5: Street Tree Guidelines... 7-18 Table 7.6: Roundabout Design Elements... 7-22 Table 7.7: Wayfinding Signage Types... 7-25 Table 9.1 Implementation Action Plan... 9-4 Table 9.2 Potential Funding and Financing Sources and Phasing for Improvements... 9-11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Specific Plan Area... 1-3 Figure 1.2: Planning Process Flow Chart... 1-10 Figure 2.1: Local Setting... 2-3 Figure 2.2: Existing Land Use Map... 2-9 Figure 2.3: General Plan Land Use Map... 2-11 Figure 2.4: Circulation: Road Network... 2-13 Figure 2.5: Circulation: Non-Auto... 2-17 Figure 2.6: Building Footprints... 2-20 Figure 2.7: Building Heights... 2-21 Figure 2.8: Opportunities Diagram... 2-25 Figure 4.1: Land Use Map... 4-5 Figure 5.1: Transit Village Mixed Use Building Placement Diagram... 5-6 Figure 5.2: Transit Village Mixed Use Building Heights Diagram... 5-6 Figure 5.3: Transit Village Medium Building Placement Diagram... 5-8 Figure 5.4: Transit Village Medium Building Height Diagram... 5-8 Figure 5.5: Medium Density Residential Building Placement Diagram... 5-10 iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 5.6: Medium Density Residential Building Height Diagram... 5-10 Figure 5.7: Medium-High Density Residential Building Placement Diagram... 5-12 Figure 5.8: Medium-High Density Residential Building Height Diagram... 5-12 Figure 5.9: Retail and Business Services Building Placement Diagram... 5-14 Figure 5.10: Retail and Business Services Building Height Diagram... 5-14 Figure 5.11: Office Building Placement Diagram... 5-16 Figure 5.12: Office Building Height Diagram... 5-16 Figure 5.13: Light Industrial Building Placement Diagram... 5-18 Figure 5.14: Light Industrial Building Height Diagram... 5-18 Figure 5.15: Public/Institutional Building Placement Diagram... 5-20 Figure 5.16: Public/Institutional Building Height Diagram... 5-20 Figure 6.1: Circulation System... 6-3 Figure 6.2: Pedestrian & Bicycle Network... 6-9 Figure 6.3: SMART Service Area... 6-12 Figure 6.4: Transit Network... 6-13 Figure 6.5: Potential Shuttle Route... 6-19 Figure 6.6: Motor Vehicle Circulation... 6-21 Figure 6.7: Points of Entry... 6-23 Figure 7.1-A: Cross Section A... 7-4 Figure 7.1-B: Cross Section B... 7-4 Figure 7.2: Sidewalk Zones... 7-8 Figure 7.3: Single-Lane Roundabout Design Elements... 7-22 Figure 7.4: Roundabout Design Elements for Pedestrian and Bicycle Access... 7-24 v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF SANTA ROSA CITY STAFF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jessica Jones, City Planner Lisa Kranz, Supervising Planner Chuck Regalia, Director of Community Development TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Adams, Transportation and Public Works Megan Basinger, Recreation, Parks and Community Services Lisa Grant, Recreation, Parks and Community Services Marc Richardson, Recreation, Parks and Community Services Autumn Buss, Economic Development and Housing Danielle Dugre, Utilities Ben Harlin, Police Scott Moon, Fire Mark McCormick, Fire Michael Ivory, Transportation and Public Works Rachel Ede, Transportation and Public Works Bryan Albee, Sonoma County Transit Steven Schmitz, Sonoma County Transit Pete Parkinson, County of Sonoma Jennifer Barrett, County of Sonoma Jackie Reinhart, Association of Bay Area Governments Janet Spilman, Sonoma County Transportation Authority John Nemeth, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Alan Zahradnik, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit CONSULTANTS PMC PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN Loreli Cappel, Project Manager Bob Yakas, TOD Advisor Jeanine Cavalli, Lead Planner & Urban Designer Martti Eckert, Urban Designer Jeff Beiswenger, Zoning Specialist OUTREACH & FACILITATION Nora DeCuir, Outreach Strategist & Facilitator W-TRANS CIRCULATION & PARKING Zack Matley, Associate Transportation Planner STRATEGIC ECONOMICS ECONOMICS & FINANCING Nadine Fogarty, Principal Sarah Graham, Senior Associate COASTLAND INFRASTRUCTURE Mark Obergfeld, Senior Project Engineer John Griffin, Senior Engineer