Washington Union Station s 2nd Century DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Similar documents
Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Welcome! Please sign-in and participate in the activities in the registration area before finding your seat. Thank you!

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

Union Station Master Plan Task 2 Briefing

New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary

Union Station Master Plan Task 3 Update

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

SW Ecodistrict A VISION PLAN FOR A MORE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE June 25, 2013

Route 110 Alternatives Analysis

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Phase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting

Point A Point B Point C Point D. City of Hapeville Public Meeting July 25, 2017

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

The Village of Shirlington

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Vision Plan Kickoff Meeting Summary Report

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Connecting Key Activity Centers with High Quality Bus Service

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Issues Requiring Future Study

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements

1.0 Circulation Element

The transportation system in a community is an

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Michigan City Alternative Analysis Realignment Study. Progress Status Update Report Presentation to City Council February 1, 2012

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Draft Evaluation of Alignment Alternatives Methodology and Results Report. 3 nd Draft. May 2011(rev June 17, 2011)

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

CITY S GOALS DRIVE MODE CHOICE IN WINSTON-SALEM, NC

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

WELCOME and introduction

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

CHAPTER VIII Implementation

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER

POTOMAC YARD METRORAIL STATION

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

Kenilworth Avenue and Town of Cheverly Industrial Study Briefing

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project. Onondaga County Planning Federation June 7, Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project 1

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

KCATA Transit Oriented Development Initiatives

NorthPoint, Inc. Community-Based Development Concept

Link Union Station (Link US) Project Open House September 26, 2018

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY VALUES Views From Around the World

Waterfront Development Master Plan

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE

8implementation. strategies

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Multimodal Station Planning Working Session Rebuilding a Better I-84 in Hartford. August 10, 2017

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. MTA Board Meeting May 6, 2014

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Partnerships in Transportation Transit-oriented Development The Return on Investment

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

County Transportation Plan Workshop

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

Planning Commission Report

Complete Streets Master Plan for Downtown New Britain CRCOG Transportation Committee Meeting Monday, December 9, 2013

preliminary master plan Cover Slide executive summary public presentation

City of Meriden Harbor Brook Flood Control Project Overview

Highway & Bridge Capabilities

Transit Oriented Development. Overview

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

UCSF Parnassus Heights Re-Envisioning Process

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON JULY 17, 2017

Prince George s County Economic Development Corporation David Iannucci President & CEO

Capital Projects impacting Odenton Town Center

Overview and Update of the Rutgers-New Brunswick Physical Master Plan. January 2015

Preliminary Assessment of Transportation Issues Related to Proposed Casino at Gateway South

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

Great Plans for a Great City

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Transcription:

Washington Union Station s 2nd Century DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1

AGENDA Introduction Station Partners The Vision Project Schedule Development Plan 2

Washington Union Station 2 nd Century Introduction 3

Union Station is The southern anchor of the busy Northeast Corridor, and a critical component to unlocking capacity constraints and protecting future high-speed rail opportunities. Set at the epicenter of four influential DC neighborhoods, and positioned to reknit two neighborhoods, and to optimize urban connectivity and revitalization. An opportunity to serve as a distinguished model of sustainable growth, urban infrastructure and environmental stewardship. A historic and iconic structure, preserved and integrated with modern intermodal functionality. An economic linchpin for the DC metropolitan region. The regions 4 th Airport, and serves more people daily than BWI, Reagan or Dulles. 4

Northeast Corridor Overview THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR: CRITICAL AND COMPLEX OPERATIONS 899 total route miles Carries intercity passenger, commuter, and freight trains Amtrak is the majority owner and infrastructure manager (546 route miles) 8 commuter railroads depend upon Amtrak for reliable operations 66% electrified 150,000 daily trips, 260 million annual passengers 1,200 bridges and tunnels, many over a centuryold U.S. prototype of legacy corridor achieving highperformance, high-capacity service 5

Supporting a Megaregion THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IS AN ECONOMIC POWERHOUSE A single day loss of service would result in $100 million in lost productivity 6

Growing Demand NORTHEAST POPULATION GROWTH By 2040, the Northeast Megaregion is projected to add 12 million people (23% growth). NORTHEAST CORRIDOR RIDERSHIP GROWTH IS PROJECTED TO CONTINUE Amtrak broken revenue and ridership records. This success is projected to continue as annual trips on all NEC services will roughly double by 2040. 7

WITH THIS GROWTH AND SUCCESS HAS COME BOTH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES A visionary solution is needed to address capacity constraints within a framework of aging, over-burdened infrastructure Major structural components are operating on centuryold infrastructure Shifting demographics prefer walkable communities Stations are operating at or near capacity NE Region projected to grow 23% (12 million people) by 2040 Station Planning & Development Highway and airport expansion not sufficient to absorb growth 8 8

NEC Station Planning AMTRAK STATIONS MASTER PLANNING ALONG THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR Moving 260 million passengers annually (and growing) requires integrated coordination in infrastructure investments up and down the corridor. D.C. BALTIMORE PHILADELPHIA NEW YORK 9 9

Washington Union Station 2 nd Century Station Partners 10

Union Station Organizational Roles Union Station Redevelopment Corporation (USRC) Nonprofit Station complex landlord, and public steward. Amtrak Intercity and commuter rail infrastructure owner and operator. Akridge Owner/developer of air rights project (Burnham Place) MARC and VRE Maryland and Virginia commuter rail providers. WMATA Subway station and red line owner and operator. Largest user of the Station (68,000 visits/day) DDOT Coordinator of surface transportation elements adjacent to the Station. Ashkenazy (Union Station Investco) Leaseholder of the Union Station property. 11

12

Union Station Redevelopment Corporation (USRC) Founded in 1983 as stewards of the Station, entrusted to protect the Station s history while developing it s future. Board of Directors Federal City Council Federal Railroad Administration US Department of Transportation (Chair) Amtrak District of Columbia Mayor USRC Est. 1983 by USDOT 501c3 13

Union Station - Existing Snapshot, 37 Million Visitors Annually Rail (Amtrak, MARC, VRE) Metrorail Streetcar (coming 2014) Intercity buses Local buses Regional commuter buses Tour/Charter buses University shuttle buses Taxi (24/7) Rental cars 2,300-spot parking garage Bike rentals and storage Retail and shopping Function/event space Amtrak corporate headquarters Amtrak package express Visitors #1 Metro Station for WMATA (68,000 trips/day) #1 MARC Station #2 Amtrak Station in the country #2 VRE Station Station handles 32 million visitors as compared to: BWI-22 million; Dulles-23 million; Reagan-19 million 2.6 Million riders/year on intercity buses alone 7 modes of transportation available; Over 30 transportation providers to choose from 14

H Street Level Plan 15

Virtual Tour 16

17

18

Washington Union Station s 2 nd Century The Vision 19

Existing Station Complex PASSENGER CONCOURSE A COLUMBUS CIRCLE MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE PARKING GARAGE AND BUS DECK (STUB- END TRACKS BELOW) H STREET BRIDGE AND NEW STREETCAR STOP METRORAIL K STREET HISTORIC STATION F STREET RUN-THROUGH TRACKS H STREET 20

The Goals Create a world-class intermodal transportation hub Match the quality and vision of the original, iconic station Provide a gateway worthy of the Nation s Capital Create a new urban neighborhood in synergy with adjacent community improvement efforts Enhance regional connectivity Double the train capacity 21 21

How do we achieve this? Create a better transportation experience - unlock space below the track and platforms, and expand concourse areas Minimalize disruption to operations during construction Permit investments as capacity is needed Take a phased approach to funding and implementation 22

Key Benefits Optimize Passenger Experience new concourses disperse passengers throughout the complex among a breadth of retail and lifestyle amenities. New, Expanded Platforms maximizing passenger safety, circulation, and capacity. New Station Entrance Points provide routes to connecting transit options as well as neighboring DC destinations. Increased Circulation Pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles will be provided with multiple access points into and around the station. Added Green Space Plans for the addition of green space, and the completion of the bike path from the Metropolitan Branch Trail directly to the station. Burnham Place The private development, controlled by Akridge, plans for mixed-use office, residential, hotel, and retail amenities with immediate access to the station. Enhanced Multimodal Services and Connections Integrated bus, taxi, streetcar, bicycle and parking 23

Washington Union Station s 2 nd Century Project Schedule 24

Projects Phasing and Work Element Status 1 2 3 4 PHASE 1: IMMEDIATE ACTION 2013-2018 PHASE 2: EAST SIDE 2019-2023 PHASE 3: WEST SIDE & TRAIN HALL 2024-2029 PHASE 4: FUTURE CAPACITY 2029+ Passenger concourse expansion New passenger amenities Platform improvements Metro access improvements Rebuild of H Street Bridge Rebuilt run-through tracks with modern platforms New lower and central concourses constructed New taxi operation and bus facilities First phase of air rights development completed New station parking facilities Remaining tracks and platforms constructed to modern configuration Garage replaced with new train hall New lower level, central concourses, and air rights development completed Greenway (linear park) constructed Rail capacity extended with new lower level tracks & platforms Extension of highspeed rail to VA and SE Corridor can be implemented Space created for additional retail and passenger amenities 25

Existing Conditions Study Consultant Schedule: AMT Engineering October 2013 Fall 2014 Scope and Goals: Will create an accurate record of spaces inside and surrounding the station to ensure all parties are working with equivalent and accurate information. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: This effort compiled over 8,000 documents from project partners and associated agencies and included a full survey/scan of the station complex Results will be used in virtually every design exercise going forward. Information will also be helpful in informing the historic preservation plan. 26

Concourse A Feasibility & Phase 1A Consultant Schedule: SYSTRA completed a Concourse Feasibility study in March 2014 SYSTRA/SOM began work on Phase 1A design alternatives in June 2014 with completion Fall 2014 Scope and Goals: To develop options for increasing capacity and circulation in the passenger concourse by relocating support functions and some amenity spaces outside of the concourse to clear the floor. This project is advancing the feasibility and design of areas in the concourse, specifically areas near Gate A west and also Gates E and F. These spaces include Mechanicals, Station Manager, APD, etc. This study is being conducted in coordination with WMATA and Ashkenazy. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: Study deliverables will provide concepts which will lead to design contracts for the renovation, excavation and expansion of Concourse A in Phase 1. 27

Phase 1 Improvements Overview of Approach Phase 1a: New passenger spaces Relocate and expand Amtrak Station manager and APD spaces outside of concourse areas Relocate east and west mechanical rooms outside of concourse area Open up Starlight and Stardust rooms for passenger use Phase 1b: Expand concourse and passenger amenities Relocate and improve Club Acela Add new First Street entrance Improve connections to retail Reconfigure ticketing and baggage operations 28

Historic Preservation Plan Consultant Schedule: Building Conservation Associates (BCA) February 2014 Spring 2015 Scope and Goals: The Historic Preservation Plan will provide an important input to the Development Plan, identifying historic resources, their significance, and treatment recommendations. To document the current conditions of the historic properties in the Union Station complex and develop a guide for their future preservation efforts. Working with a team of preservation stakeholders for input on the plan. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: BCA to assign preservation zone categories for Union Station, and to develop suggested treatment options for all spaces within the historic station building, Columbus Plaza and the perimeter retaining wall. 29

H Street Bridge Analysis managed by DDOT Consultant Schedule: Managed by DDOT Scope and Goals: This study will serve as a precedent for the full bridge design and engineering to occur in 2015-2016 Bridge superstructure replacement is a precedent for Phase 2 Environmental Assessment for bridge included within DC Streetcar, and not included within this scope 30

Amtrak NEC Master Plans: Planning Assumptions Catalog Consultant Schedule: Gannett Fleming September 2014 March 2015 Scope and Goals: Develop a practical, consistent and replicable approach for Amtrak to document its NEC master planning assumptions in a single resource catalog. Use all studies, information and data related to Washington Union Station Master Plan to develop a prototype planning assumptions catalog. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: Washington Union Station catalog will be easily referenced and updated by staff to effectively support the full extent of Amtrak s master plan implementation activities including program development and concept feasibility; concept, preliminary and final engineering design; and final construction. Catalog will be filled in and used across all station master plans in Amtrak s network. 31

Concept Feasibility Consultant Schedule: Buro Happold and Hensel Phelps August 2014 Spring 2015 Scope and Goals: To provide a comprehensive analysis of costs, schedule, phasing, staging, and means and methods based on the Amtrak Master Plan. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: Key anticipated deliverables include: cost estimates by phase, project, and component; critical path construction schedules; construction means and design vulnerabilities. 32

Outreach and Communications Consultant Schedule: Carousel30/Amtrak/Akridge/USRC Ongoing Scope and Goals: Project website under development. Ongoing stakeholder engagement and coordination. Public education, discussion and forums. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: Project website is expected to launch at the end of this year. Increased public engagement anticipated with upcoming significant project advancements in 2015. 33

Terminal Infrastructure Plan Consultant Schedule: Currently under negotiation October 2014 Fall 2015 Scope and Goals: Study the operational and physical constraints within the rail yard to provide recommendations and concept design for projects to implement capacity expansion. Infrastructure projects to be included within the Development Plan EA. This study is highly integrated with Concept Feasibility. Anticipated Deliverables, Status and Next Steps: The study will provide a conceptual but comprehensive rail yard plan including the consideration of existing conditions, design criteria and assumptions, track and platform analysis, ADA improvements, operations and infrastructure needs, phasing analysis and security requirements. 34

Burnham Place Consultant Schedule: Shalom Baranes Associates TBD Scope and Goals: The air rights development above the terminal rail yard, Burnham Place, is a significant part of the vision for Union Station, and must be fully integrated into the planning of the complex, including station entrances, day-lighting to passenger and rail areas, structural coordination, parking, traffic, open space components at H Street, and other elements. The Burnham Place design team, under the direction of Akridge, will participate in the coordination of the air rights development with the Development Planning team. This scope of work includes specific coordination with the Burnham Place plan. 35

Washington Union Station s 2 nd Century Development Plan 36

Purpose Further the vision presented in the 2012 Amtrak Washington Union Terminal Master Plan for improved rail operations and enhanced customer experience. Analysis and modification of those initial concepts to ensure that the 2 nd Century project provides for the enhanced functionality of the existing regional intermodal facility, is respectful of the historic Union Station setting, is seamlessly integrated with the surrounding neighborhoods, and advances the construction of three million square feet of new development in the air rights over the rail yard. Provide opportunity for public engagement on key components of the project: historic preservation, architectural and urban design, transportation capacity and environmental impacts. Advance architectural, engineering, and urban design concepts for the Union Station complex, allowing the 2 nd Century Partners to complete full architectural and engineering design for selected project phases. Assess environmental impacts. Specify technical aspects of the plan to be able to develop preliminary cost estimates from which to secure construction funding. 37

How other plans and studies work with the Development Plan INPUT Concept Feasibility Historic Preservation Plan COORDINATION Concourse A Phase 1 Improvements Terminal Infrastructure Phase 1 Improvements Terminal Infrastructure Plan Burnham Place 38

Plan Components and Elements Facilities Development Component Station Expansion Framework Urban Design and Open Space Element Retail and Visitor Plan Element Station Infrastructure Element Rail Passenger Component Rail Passenger Element Terminal Infrastructure Plan Multimodal Transportation Component Multimodal Transportation Capacity Vehicular Circulation and Parking Element Environmental Assessment Public Stakeholder and Engagement 39

Facilities Development Component Station Expansion Framework Architectural concepts for Train Hall, concourses, and public spaces in the complex Circulation, retail, and support facilities Urban Design and Open Space Element Columbus Plaza, greenway concept, streetscape, and coordination with Burnham Place open spaces Visitor and Retail Plan Element Market demand analysis Retail program and planning concepts Coordinate with pedestrian flow analysis Station Infrastructure Element MEP and structural concepts Fire and life safety Materials management, telecommunications, and other technical specialties 40

Rail Passenger Component Rail Passenger Element Concourse locations, operations and capacities Accommodation of different passenger populations and requirements Rail passenger support spaces: Club Acela, lounges, and customer service Terminal Infrastructure Plan (coordination with separately-led planning process) Incorporation of rail infrastructure including tracks and supporting MEP infrastructure 41

Multimodal Transportation Component Multimodal Transportation Capacity Ridership and modal split Growth projections and plans Pedestrian flow analysis Transportation element program requirements Vehicular Circulation and Parking Element Local and vicinity street network Parking program Locations and design for taxis, buses, service vehicles 42

Environmental Assessment Provide sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact Aid compliance with the Act when no environmental impact statement is necessary Facilitate preparation of a full Environmental Impact Statement when one is necessary Developed in conjunction with Facilities Development, Rail Passenger, and Multimodal Transportation components of the plan. Historic Preservation Plan complete by start of Development Plan H Street Bridge environmental requirements being undertaken by DDOT as part of DC Street Car 43

Public Stakeholder Engagement Public input throughout the process is essential, and will be required at various stages as the work in this scope progresses. Formulate and assist in the execution of a public and agency outreach process. Coordinate with public engagement process that is included within the Environmental Assessment effort. 44

Principal Deliverables Concept level design in Revit Renderings Preparation for architectural scale model Executive Summary Master Development Plan Report Technical Report Pedestrian Flow Analysis Market Demand Analysis Environmental Assessment Real-time intermodal transportation simulation Documentation of Public Engagement process 45

Optional Scope Components Design Guidelines Full design of specific projects within the Development Plan 46

Not Included within Scope Approvals plan and approvals coordination with public agencies Surveying or documentation of existing conditions including on-site buildings, topography, rail infrastructure, and utilities. 47

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING 48