DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DEEP DIVE THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2017

Similar documents
4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

13. New Construction. Context & Character

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee May 17, 2016

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

Design Guidelines for Residential Subdivisions

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

Community Design Plan

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND APPENDICES

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

City of Bellingham. Multifamily Residential Design Handbook

Design Guidelines Update Strategy Report

ARTICLE 8 DESIGN STANDARDS

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

Planning Board Briefing

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Commercial Development Standards. City of Homestead

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

PLANNING STAFF REVIEW

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

SEAPINES STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH MARCH 2017

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

appendix and street interface guidelines

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Description of Preferred Alternative

Residential Design Standards Stakeholders Meeting

Gateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN. CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE CENTRE. airdrie, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 2012

KEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

Transcription:

DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DEEP DIVE THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2017

The Plan Article 5 Project Design Where we are in the process and what has been accomplished General organization of the document Specifics Questions, comments and concerns

50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000? Bozeman population 1970 2015 25,000 20,000 15,000 Approx 4.2% annually 10,000 5,000 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020

Fastest growing Mircopolitan area in the nation Approx 4.2% annually

Where to Find it: Planning Department, 20 E. Olive Street, City Hall, Clerk s office, 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman Public Library reference desk, 626 E Main Street, Montana State University reference desk, and www. bozeman.net (online as a PDF)

Adoption Schedule

Adoption Plan Public outreach is in addition to the extensive effort completed over the past 18 months; over 60 public engagements to date. The majority of the concepts and specific changes in the draft have been reviewed during various public events and the City Commission.

Adoption Plan Workshops focusing on overviews and specific subjects Advisory Boards including: UDC Advisory Committee Zoning Commission Planning Board Inter Neighborhood Council Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board Design Review Board More

Project Goals User-friendliness Consistency Clarity Compatibility Flexibility Predictability (community and developer)

Project Goals Major initiatives Reorganization Consolidate design standards Housing variety Infill support Form rather than use emphasis Review procedure improvement Midtown districts

Infill Support Cottage housing Revised park land procedures to lessen procedural burden on small project Small lot provisions Accessory dwelling unit revisions for design Simplified review procedures for many uses Alley loaded lots allowed additional flexibility Casino overlay issues consolidated into design standards

Greater Emphasis on Form Uses consolidated and broadened in commercial districts Specific design standards which are supportive of many uses are included with the block frontage approach Specific standards for transition between different uses and districts Simpler standards for accessory buildings which address location and size rather than use Added DRB review for tall buildings

Completed to Date 1. Affordable townhouse lot size averaging 2. Cash in-lieu of infrastructure 3. R-5 and B-2M added to sign code 4. R-5 group living use added 5. Parks as an allowed use in all districts 6. B-1 Apartment 7. Cottage housing 8. Level of Service for intersections 9. Property maintenance and demolition of historic structures 10. Create B-2M and R-5 districts 11. Midtown zone map amendments 12. Site Plan review process revisions 13. Revise wetland review board 14. Revise entryway corridors 15. Covenants and supplemental materials

Code Organization CHAPTER 38 - UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE STRUCTURE ARTICLE 1. General provisions (user guide, and purpose & authority) ARTICLE 2. Permits, legislative actions & procedures (consolidates project applications, review procedures, and approval criteria) ARTICLE 3. Zoning districts & land use (introduces zones, permitted uses, and density & dimensional standards) ARTICLE 4. Community design (includes standards related to public and larger scale community design issues such as streets, block size & connectivity, subdivision design, and parks) ARTICLE 5. Project design (includes standards to apply to the design of individual developments, including development frontages, site planning, building design, parking, landscaping, signage, etc.) ARTICLE 6. Natural resource protection (mostly wetlands and floodplain regulations) ARTICLE 7. Definitions

Article 5 Project Design A. Division 38.500 - Introduction B. Division 38.510 Block Frontage C. Division 38.520 Site Planning & Design Elements D. Division 38.530 Building Design

Project Design 38.520 Site Planning & Design Elements Relationship to adjacent properties Non-motorized circulation & design Internal circulation Vehicular circulation & parking Inter-site connectivity Internal roadway design Internal open space Residential open space Commercial open space Pedestrian-oriented open space design Service areas and mechanical equipment Location of equipment Screening of ground service areas and equipment Utility meters, electrical conduit, and other Roof mounted equipment 38.530 Building Design Building character Building character Architecture that is defined predominantly by corporate identity features Building massing & articulation Façade articulation storefront and other non-residential uses on the ground floor Façade articulation residential buildings Maximum façade width Roofline modulation Building details Façade details Window design standards High visibility corner and gateway sites Cornice/roofline design Articulated building entries Building materials Quality traditional materials Special conditions and limitations Blank wall treatment Definition Untreated blank wall

Article 5 Project Design Where does it apply? 1. To all commercial, industrial, and multi-household buildings, excluding single and two-household dwellings (510.010.B). 2. Eliminates Entryway Corridors

When do they apply? Levels of improvement 38.500.020 Level I exterior remodels and/or increase footprint up to 50% Level II - increase footprint between 50 100 % Level III footprint more than 100% More lenient than today

Article 5 Project Design How does it work? 1. Modulates development based on zoning district and character of neighborhood through Block Frontage 2. NCOD remains 3. Allows for special situations CDF Master Plans Departures 4. Generally reduces setbacks increasing development potential

Storefront Frontage Division 38.510.030.B Storefront Block Frontage (limited applicability)

Storefront Example Storefront Block Frontage Urban environment

Storefront Example Design Elements: Entryway facing street Sidewalk depth Transparency at least 60% (30 to 10 ) Building placement Weather protection Parking Departures

Storefront Example Comments on: Building placement Entrances Façade transparency Sidewalk depth Weather protection Parking Departures and departure criteria

Landscape Frontage Division 38.510.030.C Similar to today adding the following from the Design Objectives Plan: Formalizing building entrance requirement Building placement is allowed to be closer to street. Arterial and collector setback requirement. Façade transparency Weather protection Departures

Landscape Example

Landscape Example Design Elements: Entryway facing street Sidewalk depth (6 ) Transparency is variable Building placement Weather protection Departures

Landscape Example Design Elements: Landscaping Transparency no less than 25% (NRU) Building placement Weather protection Departures

Landscape Example Design Elements: Parking limited to no more than 50% of the street frontage Departures

Landscape Example Comments on: Building placement Entrances Façade transparency Weather protection Parking Departures and departure criteria Sidewalk depth

Mixed Standards Division 38.510.030.D Mixed Block Frontage

Mixed Standards Building placement Either may apply depending on needs. However, based on use standards vary Transparency follows storefront or landscape Weather protection Departures Storefront Plaza Landscape

Mixed Frontage Comments on: Building placement Façade transparency Sidewalk depth Departures and departure criteria

Gateway Standards Division 38.510.030.E Gateway Block Frontage Min 25 foot setback Entrance must be visible from street Parking to side or rear and no more than 60% Departures

Internal & Other Standards Division 38.510.030.F Internal Storefront Block Frontage Modified Storefront for internal roadways Departures Division 38.510.030.G Other Block Frontage Undesignated and secondary/tertiary streets 10 setback Transparency required Weather protection may be required Building entrances Departures

Frontage Standards Division 38.510.030, parts F, H, I, & J, K. Special case Block Frontage. Internal streets, industrial streets, trails/park frontages, and multiple streets frontage situations

CDF Master Plan Division 38.510.030.L CDF Master Plan a. To provide thoughtful and fair process to plan for the development of large and new commercial and mixeduse sites consistent with Bozeman s growth policy. b. To promote the arrangement of streets, buildings, open space, parking and service areas that creates a strong sense of community and enhances the character of Bozeman. c. To avoid uncoordinated patterns of development that waste valuable land, compromise vehicular and pedestrian access, and degrade the character of Bozeman.

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.030 - Relationship to adjacent properties Balconies rear & side yards adjacent to residential zones

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.040 - Non-motorized circulation & design 1. Access to sidewalk 2. Internal circulation 3. Pathway design 4. Bicycle facilities

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.050 - Vehicular circulation & parking 1. Driveways 2. Inter-site connectivity 3. Internal roadway design (including drive-through facilities The examples above include angled parking and planter strips with street trees. Pedestrian-scaled lighting also contributes to the character in the upper right image. The above left image illustrates a thoroughfare lane with a row of street trees. A sidewalk is included on one side of the street to provide a strategic connection between businesses. The right image illustrates the curbless woonerf design where travel speeds are low and lanes are shared between pedestrians and vehicles. Figure 38.520.050.D Good internal roadway examples.

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.060 - Internal open space 1. Usable residential open space Common open space Ground floor private yards Balconies Common indoor recreation areas Shared roof decks 2. 38.520.070 - Service support considerations

1. Usable residential open space The upper examples include a combination of open lawn area for informal recreation plus walkways and decorative landscape areas to enhance the setting for residents. The left image above includes a covered gathering space with outdoor grills adjacent to a landscaped commons with a central pathway. The right image includes a pond/wetland type area with boardwalk and seating areas. Figure 38.520.060.B.2 Common open space examples.

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.060 - Internal open space 1. Usable commercial open space developments larger than one (1) acre; 2%. See figure 38.520.060.D.2. Does not include M-1 and M-2. The development envelope on both sites is 102,400sf (2.35 acres). The minimum amount of usable commercial open space (2% of development envelope) is 2,048sf. The left example consolidates the open space into one plaza near the major building entry. The right example includes three separate open spaces at strategic, visible locations. Figure 38.520.060.C Example site development integrating usable commercial open space.

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.060 - Internal open space Figure 38.520.060.D.1 Example of a small pedestrian-oriented open space

Site Plan & Design Elements 38.520.070 - Service support considerations 1. Location of ground related service areas & mechanical equipment. 2. Screening of ground related service areas & requirement 3. Utility meters, electrical conduit & other apparatus 4. Roof mounted mechanical equipment

Site Plan & Design Elements Place utility meters in less visible locations. The upper and lower left examples are successfully tucked away in a less visible location and/or screened by vegetation. The right images are poorly executed and would not be permitted in such visible locations. Such meters must be coordinated and better integrated with the architecture of the building. Figure 38.520.070.D Utility meter location and screening good and bad examples

Site Plan & Design Elements All three examples use durable and attractive enclosures with trees and shrubs to soften views of the enclosures from the side. The lower left example uses a trellis structure on top a desirable example particularly where the top of the enclosures are visible from surrounding buildings, streets, and walkways (due to topography or building heights). Departures to the provisions of subsections C.1 and 2 above will be considered provided the enclosure and landscaping treatment meet the intent of the standards and add visual interest to site users. All three examples use durable and attractive enclosures with trees and shrubs to soften views of the enclosures from the side. The lower left example uses a trellis structure on top a desirable example particularly where the top of the enclosures are visible from surrounding buildings, streets, and walkways (due to topography or building heights). Figure 38.520.070.C Acceptable screening enclosures

Building Design Division 38.530 (integration of Design Objectives Plan) 1. 38.530.030 - Character 2. 38.530.040 - Massing and articulation 3. 38.530.050 - Building details 4. 38.530.060 - Building materials 5. 38.530.070 - Blank wall treatment

Building Design Applies to all commercial, industrial, and residential building with three or more units. Industrial zones may employ different provisions. NCOD applicability

Building Design 38.530.030 Character NCOD conformance Architecture that is defined predominately by corporate identity features, aka, franchise architecture. Additional guidance being developed o Definition - a type of retail sales activity or retail sales establishment that has eleven or more other retail sales establishments in operation, or with local land use or permit entitlements already approved, located anywhere in the world. In addition to the eleven or more other retail sales establishments located in the World, maintains two or more of the following features: a standardized array of merchandise, a standardized facade, a standardized decor and color scheme, a uniform apparel, standardized signage, a trademark or a servicemark. In other words, retail stores with multiple locations and a recognizable "look" or appearance.

Building Design 38.530.040 - Massing and articulation Façade articulation nonresidential and residential use building. Departures allowed Roofline modulation

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) B. Façade details C. Windows D. High visibility street corners & gateway sites E. Cornice/roofline design F. Articulated building entries

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) B. Façade details - New buildings & level II/III additions must include on detail from three categories. 1) Window & entry treatment 2) Building elements & façade details 3) Building materials

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) C. Windows

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) D. High visibility street corners & gateway sites Within 20 of street corner Include design feature, see pg. 420

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) E. Cornice/roofline design Building 1 uses a dramatic overhanging cornice at the corner. The left portion of Building 1 uses a very simple cornice line to go with the upper level setback. Building 2 uses a traditional cornice line. Figure 38.530.050.E Examples of buildings employing confident and distinctive rooflines. Building 3 uses capped projecting columns along with an understated cornice line. Building 4 uses a very simple roofline which is acceptable in this case due to the prominence of the wooden canopy. Figure 38.530.050.E Examples of buildings employing confident and distinctive rooflines.

Building Design 38.530.050 - Building details (applies to non-residential and mixed use buildings) F. Articulated building entries Figure 38.530.050.F Acceptable building entry examples.

Building Design 38.530.060 - Building materials CMU Metal siding EIFS Cementious wall board paneling/siding

Building Design 38.530.070 Blank walls Figure 38.530.070.B Blank wall definition

Design Review Board Participation Current DRB trigger criteria (2.05.3000, 38.19.040.C, 38.20.040.2(d), and 38.22.180.C.3). In general: 1. 20 or dwelling units, 2. 30,000 sq/ft commercial/office/industrial space, 3. Parking for more than 90 vehicles, 4. Large scale retail, 5. PUD s, and 6. When requested by Director 7. Appeals of ADR

Design Review Board Participation Proposed DRB trigger criteria. In general: 1. As described above or (disjunctive) 2. All buildings with four (4) or more stories 3. Increase Dwelling Units to 45 or more For Discussion 4. Concept Plan review 1. Would require additional meetings. 2. May require meeting during the day

Thank you! Tom Rogers trogers@bozeman.net 406-582-2260 www.bozemancodeupdate.com

Article 3 Districts & Dimensions District character Use Dimensional standards Building height Bulk and mass FAR Overlays NCOD Accessory structures

Article 3

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Reduced lot size in R-3 and R-4 districts Reduced lot width in R-3 and R-4 districts Added Far to address lot coverage Reduced setbacks for Arterial and Collector streets Yards vs. setbacks

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Reduced front yard setbacks & maximum Encroachments Residential garage (see Article 5)

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Zone edge transition (Figure 38.320.060) Setbacks Building height Residential garage (see Article 5)

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: No change to the boundaries or application of the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) Recommendation in the NCOD report to be addressed at a later date

Article 3 38.340.090-130 Historic and nonhistoric structures and properties: Ordinance #1920. See Commission hearing January 30, 2017. See page 227 230. Requires maintenance throughout City Differentiates between historic & non-historic structures Clarifies how and when historic and non-historic structures can be demolished

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Accessory buildings, uses, and equipment (38.360.030 & 040). See also Table 38.320.030. Accessory structure may not exceed principal height Daylight plane Figure 38.360.030.G Daylight Plane

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) (38.360.030 & 040). See also Table 38.320.030. No change in parking requirements Ground floor ADU permitted with alley access in R-2, 3, 4, 5, R-O, and REMU. Must meet lot size requirements for each District. Figure 38.360.030.G Daylight Plane

Article 3 Main Proposed Changes: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) (38.360.030 & 040). Limited to 600 sq/ft in all districts Owner occupied in R-S & R-1 Detached ADU in R-S & R-1 only in subdivisions plated after Jan 1, 1997, not restricted if within principal dwelling. Figure 38.360.030.G Daylight Plane

Table 38.360.030 Form & Intensity: Table 38.320.030.

Article 4 Community Design Sidewalks Trails and open space Parks Blocks Roads Utilities Community centers Alleys Driveways

Article 4 Main Proposed Changes: For townhouse / row-house driveway width & location < 30, not allowed 30, limited to 12 Reducing maximum driveway width depending on lot width for single household development

Article 4 Main Proposed Changes: No change to parkland requirements Refining how houses and building address park space

Article 5 Project Design A. Introduction B. Block Frontage Standards C. Site Planning & Design Elements D. Building Design E. Parking F. Landscaping G. Signs H. Outdoor Lighting

Questions? Comments? Concerns?

Bozeman Code Update The purpose of this project is to implement the N 7 th Corridor Plan, review and update, as needed, the Unified Development Code (UDC) for the City of Bozeman. Development code needs updating Appropriately accommodate growth Sustainability Continue to further our Growth Policy and adopted plans

What is it Reality