expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E

Similar documents
Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

13. New Construction. Context & Character

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. Terms of Reference. Purpose. When is an Urban Design Brief Required

RIVERSIDE DESIGN CD-1 GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 9, 1983

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

GUIDELINES EXHIBITION PLACE LOCATION: OBJECTIVES. Structure Plan URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

REZONING POLICY FOR CHINATOWN SOUTH (HA-1A) Adopted by City Council on April 19, April 2011

22.15 OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNAGE POLICY

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE MEREDITH PLANNING BOARD BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Building Exterior Lighting Grant Program. Applications will be reviewed April 1, July 1 and October 1, 2019

Planning Board Briefing

DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF OTTAWA

Willamette Falls Downtown District Policies and Design Guidelines

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

MOMENTUM. Design Brief. Site Plan Control and Minor Variance Applications. 59 Russell Avenue

burlington mobility hubs study Downtown Burlington Mobility Hub

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc.

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

CHAPTER 5: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

appendix and street interface guidelines

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape.

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Planning Commission Re-Submittal. December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines

Urban Design Brief. 583, 585 and 589 OXFORD STREET EAST. Salt Clinic Canada Inc.

HAMILTON SECONDARY PLANS

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

Hamilton Pier 7&8 Public Meeting and Workshop #1

COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

MAIN STREET DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTEXT

Town Center Design Guidelines

/05 Architectural Response

Place Brief. National Collections Facility (NCF site)

BYLAW TOWN OF BLACK DIAMOND

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

APPENDIX E DESIGN GUIDELINES

The Master Plan Framework

2.0 Strategic Context 4

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

5.0 BUILT FORM ST. GEORGE S SENIOR SCHOOL MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES. Brooklin Community Centre and Library, Perkins+Will

Central Village Design Guidelines Westport, MA

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

Contact: Alex Taranu ( ) or Karl Walsh ( )

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

CAROLINA NORTH DESIGN FRAMEWORK

THE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL. Laura Ryan, Planner Yvette Luke, Senior Planner Candice Dannhauer, Recording Clerk

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

Residential Design Standards Stakeholders Meeting

GUIDELINES TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL LOCATION. INTRODUCTION Existing College Wing Buildings and Site Plan - Figure 1A and Figure 1B.

King-Spadina Secondary Plan Community Consultation Meeting. Michelle Knieriem, City Planner October 11, 2017

Design Guidelines. Gardnerville Plan for Prosperity

Crofton Manor 2803 West 41st Avenue WHAT WE HEARD. Public Consultation: Phase 1

MATURE SUBURBS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Urban Design Review Panel Submission. The Ottawa Train Yards - Office Development. 405 Terminal Avenue. 17 April Table of Contents.

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Audi London 481 Wharncliffe Road South, London, Ontario. October, 2013

Urban Design Brief Site Redevelopment King St. East Hamilton, Ontario

July 18, 2017 City of Vancouver 453 West 12th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 Attention: Ms. Linda Gillan. Dear Linda,

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

Transcription:

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E 1 April 2004

W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E expectations for new development Introduction and Intent This statement of expectations for development describes the type and shape of development that the City of Winnipeg anticipates for the west side of Waterfront Drive, from Lombard Avenue to Higgins Avenue. Developers and their design teams will use this Buildings in the Exchange District National Historic Site are substantial in scale and materials. brief to guide their proposals. The City will use this brief to evaluate development proposals. Every development will be considered from the perspective of the broader setting, which it must respect, the development of the site, and the character of the building. Area Description Pedestrians take priority along Waterfront Drive where buildings offer a dynamic street edge. This document applies to new development along the west side of Waterfront Drive as seen in the cover map. The map illustrates the development region and how it overlaps with the Exchange District National Historic Site indicated as the area within the blue line. Red areas on the map represent the surplus parcels that will be available for sale immediately adjacent to the Drive noted in yellow. The Vision Quality infill development relates to neighbouring properties in height, materials, scale, and pattern of mass to void. To encourage the development of a thriving, pedestrianoriented, mixed-use residential neighborhood that conserves and strengthens the unique identity of this historic warehouse precinct. Valued features include: the picturesque river edge, rare views of the downtown skyline, massive stone and brick warehouses, and narrow, angled streets and covered alleys that recall the time when this area was the commercial centre of Winnipeg. April 2004 2

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E Development Criteria New developments are expected to meet these criteria as well as applicable zoning regulations. If an application for new development respects the development criteria outlined in this brief the design review process will be straightforward. Development criteria include the following: The Setting Built form Acknowledge the scale of the existing buildings and the established pattern of streets and alleys Heritage Maintain a respectful relationship to the Exchange District National Historic Site, between Lombard Avenue and James Avenue Mixed uses Build upon the existing mix of uses to create the critical mass necessary for around the clock activity Riverbank edge Maintain existing and create new connections between the river and the streets and buildings of the warehouse precinct Views and vistas Respect and enhance views and vistas The Site Building orientation New construction should relate to both Waterfront Drive and, where applicable, historic streets. New buildings on corner lots should have two primary building facades Building placement Maintain the continuous building edge on historic streets. Buildings on Waterfront Drive may be setback from the property line to provide amenity space for pedestrians Pedestrian first Place the pedestrian before the vehicle; limit curb cuts on Waterfront Drive Service areas Parking, loading, garbage containers, and hydro transformers should be located internally or at the rear of buildings Streetscapes in the Exchange District National Historic Site are created by building up to property lines, the scale of the buildings, and active storefronts. Additions to historic buildings are successful when they are sympathetic in scale, massing, geometry, details, and materials. Larger scale buildings are appropriate when the elevations read as smaller buildings with multiple points of entry. Semi-private spaces at grade enhance residential developments. 3 April 2004

W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E expectations for new development New development on large parcels will take cues from neighbouring historic properties when determining mass, height, and scale. At street level, buildings will have dynamic faces where public entries are clearly defined. Quality materials expertly arranged in compositions that reflect the materiality of the area as well as forms of typical buildings provide a richer urban environment. The Building Building height 2 storey to 6 storey-building heights are encouraged Building massing Should appear substantial (scale, height, silhouette, relationship to the ground). Where the parcels are large, new construction should have the appearance of a series of several buildings Building composition Respect the composition of existing buildings (proportion, geometry, mass versus void relationship, texture) Building materials and construction methods Construction materials and craftsmanship must be at least of quality comparable to those found in the National Historic Site Building transparency Buildings will have transparent and active storefronts through the use of glass and entrances. Inviting connections between the inside and outside of the building increase feelings of security and comfort on the street Signage Should be oriented to the pedestrian level and integrated into the building s architecture. Develop a sign plan for buildings with multiple occupants. Public entries Buildings should have clearly defined and inviting multiple entries. Private and semi-private areas should be clearly demarcated at grade by changes of level, low planting or setbacks Mechanical units Rooftop equipment should be inconspicuous April 2004 4

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E Development Appraisal The following questions will help developers and their designers evaluate their proposals and prepare for review by the City s downtown design review process. The Setting Does the development form a harmonious group or composition with existing buildings? What contributions does the proposal make to the character of the Exchange District National Historic Site and Waterfront Drive? Does it demonstrate a vertically integrated mix of uses contributing to day/evening, year-round activity (e.g. combinations of retail/restaurant/entertainment on main floor, with dwellings/office/retail above)? Does it link pedestrian routes and destinations to each other and to the river edge? Does it preserve or enhance important views and vistas? A study of the area s historic warehouses will lead to suitable contemporary interpretations of this common building type. The Site Has the established building setback been respected? Have the needs of the pedestrian been considered first? Is the pedestrian environment safe and comfortable? Are entry points clear and convenient? Are existing pedestrian routes respected? Are service areas visible from the public sidewalk? The Building Does building massing, height, and scale fit the surrounding context? What materials are used? How do they relate to those of the surrounding buildings? Is the quality as high? Are there any interesting comparisons or contrasts in the use of materials? How will the colours work together? Does the detailing of the materials show signs of careful thought or originality in the way the building is put together? Does the building design encourage street animation? Are there multiple points of entry and transparency at grade level? Are mechanical units conspicuous? Does signage reflect and enhance district character? Is it well integrated into the building design? Strict design criteria in other communities allow creative and sympathetic additions in historic areas. New buildings in historic districts can be contemporary as long as there is a respect for traditional building types and forms (scale, detail, and similar expression of the structural system). 5 April 2004

W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E expectations for new development Design and Development Review Process Step 1. CentreVenture accepts site development proposal. Step 2. Proponent and consultant meet with Planning, Property and Development Department staff. Step 3. Proponent submits application for permits. Step 4. Planning, Property and Development Department staff schedule Design Review (and other approvals). Step 5. Design Review Committee recommends approval (or not). Step 6. Planning, Property and Development Department Director approval, followed by permit issuance. The design and development review process illustrated here is intended to identify key steps in a proposal s evolution from concept to final design. Of course there are a number of more modest or incremental aspects that have not been included. Planning, Property and Development Department staff will endeavour to ensure all review process steps are identified and dealt with in a timely and transparent manner. Commitments This document does not depart from previous policy direction and commitments made in documents such as: Plan Winnipeg: 2020 Vision CentrePlan: Development Framework and Vision and Strategies The Exchange District National Historic Site of Canada Commemorative Integrity Statement Historical Buildings By-law Preliminary East Exchange Management Strategy Downtown Winnipeg Zoning By-law References Applicants are encouraged to also refer to the following: Exchange District Strategic Action Plan Architectural Guidelines for Waterfront Drive (draft) Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada Waterfront Drive must encourage an intimate scale of development. For further information please contact: CentreVenture Development Corporation 303-35 King Street Winnipeg, MB R3B 1H4 204.954.7733 info@centreventure.com www.centreventure.com Photo Credits: City of Winnipeg, Manitoba Archives, City of Vancouver, Canadian Architect, Opus Hotel, Miller+Hull, and Building for Life. April 2004 6