Transit-Oriented Development

Similar documents
Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

Windsor Locks Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grant Request. Project Background

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

1.3 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community planning

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

VISION, GOALS & CONCEPT DIAGRAM 2.0

Chapter 1: Introduction

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Roosevelt Station: Transit-Oriented Development. Workshop #3 - February 22, 2017

Kensington Center. Public Meeting # Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

Tony Garcia, City-County Planning Commission & Beth Alden, Hillsborough MPO

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City of Villages Parking Strategies. William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006

Nader Obied Abd al raheem hathat. Dr. Farid S. Al-Qeeq

Pattern 3: Parking. Parking in great amounts is not a characteristic of great streets. Allan Jacobs. Community Form and Mobility Principles

The Village of Shirlington

Somers Point Master Plan

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

1 Adapted from the Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study by CalTrans, 2006

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

Moody Centre Station TOD Area Today

About Momentum Midland

WELCOME and introduction

NJ s Land Use and Transit Policies

Integrated Urban Development. April Reflections from the NZPI Study Tour of Portland, Seattle and Vancouver

Information Session July 25, 2018

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Wasatch CHOICE for 2040

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Route 1 Corridor Study

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

In the heart of the Southern Sector is a diamond in the rough

Silverdale Regional Center

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

Status Report: MD 355 Project

3. Endorse the LRT vision in transforming Surrey into Connected-Complete-Livable communities, and more specifically, the official vision statement:

The Neighbourhood Unit

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Land Use & Transportation Primer

City of Lake Mary, Florida. Evolution of a Historic Downtown with Transit Oriented Development Strategies

West Ocala Vision & Community Plan City Council Work Session. Presented by West Ocala Community Plan Steering Committee

3. ELEMENTS OF THE METRO VISION 2035 PLAN

Sprawling urban development and auto-dominated streets

Mix of Uses Guide for Transit-Oriented Development MIX OF USES

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

Urban Planning and Land Use

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Franklin/Myrtle School Small Area Plan Adopted February 18, 2003

DRAFT City of Titusville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements April 16, 2018

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Shared Principles and Emerging Plan Directions

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

Packet Contents. Joint Planning Work Session Timeline.. Introduction.. Work Session Directions... 5

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

An advanced tool for assessing and guiding sustainable urban development

6. Consistency with Local Plans

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Age Friendly Design ( 2:15 Breakout Session )

GPA FALL 2017 CONFERENCE

Transcription:

Transit-Oriented Development Path to Sustainability West Windsor February 22, 2007 George S. Hawkins

Context for Presentation NJ Future is a non-partisan, 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Offer perspective, education and support

My Goals for the Evening Provide a context for current situation Suggest planning approach Conclusion: Seize the Day!

Part 1 Context of the Current Situation

Current Growth Patterns Low density Single use Auto dependent Loss of local/unique features Loss of open space Scattered leapfrogging development Urban/older community decline

Land Consumption Land consumption 3.2 x faster than population growth New Jersey will be the first state to achieve full build-out

Percent Developed 1986-95, 95, Central NJ 0 5 % 5 10 % 10 % or more

For every 1% increase in developed land, there is a corresponding 1-1.5% increase in VMT

Traffic Increasing Vehicle Miles Traveled Annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita on New Jersey's road system 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Auto-dependant Commuting Change in Jobs, 1990-99 lost 2,000 or more lost 1,000 to 1,999 lost 200 to 999 lost 1 to 199 gained 0 to 199 gained 200 to 999 gained 1,000 to 1,999 gained 2,000 or more

"! ) # 2- -, -., )+ & ) > 46 = Low Density Development percentage of New Jersey population living at various densities, 1950-1998 * & & % #$ /10 & %&(' $ & ' 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1998 7 98 76 354 <; 7 6 4: persons per square mile:?@4a 5,000 and up 1,000-4,999 < 1,000

Economic Prosperity Brookings Institution hired to do an economic diagnostic of the State. Issues a report Prosperity at Risk Single biggest threat: sprawled land use patterns, separation of housing from jobs, lack of housing choices. Not sustainable pattern: economic or environmental

Not Just WHERE,, but HOW We Build If New Jersey developed at the density of Princeton, its entire population could fit into 18% of the state s land area If New Jersey developed at the density of Montgomery, we would need more than 2 New Jerseys to accommodate the people who are here today

Solutions Where we grow --- change state and local policies to favor redevelopment over greenfield development and fix it first over build new to save money and land. How we grow --- Mix uses, build more densely to save land, reduce costs and provide more mobility choices by connecting land use and transportation.

PART II West Windsor and Transit Oriented Development

NJ Transit Village Program The Transit Village Initiative helps to redevelop and revitalize communities around transit facilities to make them an appealing choice for people to live, work and play, thereby reducing reliance on the automobile.

Program Summary Interagency task force reviews applications Small number of municipalities selected to participate In last round, 20 applied 2 were selected Now 16 Transit Villages

TOD: General Features Less automobile dependent Safer and more attractive for pedestrians and bicyclists Cleaner from fewer cars More viable for those who don t drive (seniors and children) Good for existing and new residents

Key Attribute: Pedestrian Friendly Wide, attractive sidewalks connections and places to go Shops, offices, restaurants at street level Traffic calming devices, cross walks and speed bumps Landscaping and decorative devices

Improve the Whole Community Open spaces near transit facility, connected to walk and bikeways Location of parking lots along walkways, minimize walking in parking lots Wider walks near station to support sidewalk activities (sidewalk sales, outdoor dining) Connect outward to existing neighborhoods

Benefits of Selection State of New Jersey commitment to the municipality's vision for redevelopment Coordination among the state agencies that make up the Transit Village task force. Priority funding from some state agencies (NJDCA Smart Growth Grants) Technical assistance from some state agencies Eligibility for grants from annual $1 million in NJDOT's Transit Village funding

Additional Benefits Voorhees Transportation Center at Rutgers found that residents of NJ existing Transit Villages rate their towns better places to live compared to other residents. Increased property values Safer streets

14 Criteria for Selection Criteria 1: A good Transit Village candidate must make a commitment to grow in jobs, housing and population.

Criteria 2 A designated Transit Village must have a transit facility. This can be a rail or light rail station, ferry terminal, a bus hub or bus transfer station.

Criteria 3 The candidate for Transit Village designation must have vacant land and/or underutilized or deteriorated buildings within walking distance of transit where redevelopment can take place.

Criteria 4 A Transit Village candidate must have an adopted land-use strategy for achieving compact, transitsupportive, mixed-use development within walking distance of transit. This land use strategy should be based on transit-oriented development (TOD) principles and can be in the form of a redevelopment plan or zoning ordinance.

Criteria 5 The candidate must have a strong residential component. This can include mid-rise buildings, townhouses or apartments over firstfloor businesses. A wide variety of housing choices within walking distance of transit helps to support transit ridership.

Criteria 6 A good candidate will have "readyto-go" projects. This means at least one transit-oriented project that can be completed within three years.

Criteria 7 In order for a municipality to succeed as a Transit Village, it should demonstrate pedestrian and bicycle friendliness. This means clear, direct pathways from the transit station to shops, offices, surrounding neighborhoods and other destinations.

Criteria 8 A good candidate views its transit station as the focal point of the community and uses its station plaza as a gathering place for community activities such as festivals, concerts, public ceremonies and farmers markets.

Criteria 9 A good candidate includes its transit station in a station area management plan, in a special improvement district (SID) or as part of a Main Street New Jersey designation.

Criteria 10 A good candidate should strive to minimize automobile use by maximizing the appeal of transit. One example of this is the concierge service in the Metuchen train station. Commuters drop off errands (such as dry cleaning, packages for mailing, etc.) in the morning and pickup items on the opposite side of the tracks on the way home.

Criteria 11 The candidate should provide commuter parking for residents and non-residents. A Transit Village should also strive to reduce parking requirements near transit stations and implement shared parking solutions wherever possible.

Criteria 12 The candidate should support local arts and culture. This brings vibrancy and activity to a community. Designating an arts, antique or restaurant district helps make a Transit Village a destination.

Criteria 13 The candidate should support the historic and architectural integrity of the community by ensuring that new buildings blend in with the existing buildings. This can be done with architectural design guidelines that govern new building facades, window replacements, awnings, lighting and signs.

Criteria 14 The candidate should consider how to incorporate some affordable housing within walking distance of transit since low and moderate income households rely heavily on public transportation.

From Transit Village Selection Criteria Key Criteria for West Windsor 5 Variety of residential uses 7 - Bicycle and pedestrian friendly 8 Focal point 10 Minimize automobile use 11 Residents and non-residents shared parking arrangements 12 Local arts and culture 13 Integrity with historic design and community 14 Affordable Housing within walking distance

Part III Planning for the Future

Planning 101 Process Issues Transparency of process Who is doing what, and when. Accessibility of information public can easily attain and review information Structured decisions: Characterize Assess Plan Evaluate Select

Characterize Design aspects of Transit Village are variable. Need to start with characterization of capacity roads and parking Need to understand financial implications scale of residential housing, type of residential housing, commercial development offset financial modeling Other issues: stormwater, open space, pedestrian access, retail opportunities

Public Involvement Opportunity: Develop a consensus vision for the community Engage in Choices of Design: Roads/intersections to be included and/or redesigned Amenities to be added Location and design of new development

Open, Outreach, Outcome Public process that is open Public process that reaches out to all participants Public process that starts by defining some clear outcomes Public process that develops alternatives to compare to outcomes

Example Outcomes Improved connection through the town center Improved pedestrian and bicycle access to station and neighborhoods Improved access to retail that is desirable addition Improved housing choices that limits financial cost Improved traffic flow, including shared parking State funding support in planning and development Neighborhood Center that adds to the quality of life of WEST WINDSOR residents

Critical Point to Remember West Windsor Town Center is not a redevelopment in many ways, but is the opportunity to design development, trails, walkways, open space, and roads to form a completely new landscape.

Today West Windsor already bears most of the costs associated with a major transit station, but has gained very little of the benefit.

Tomorrow West Windsor can plan, design and build a focus of town that connects neighborhoods, that reduces traffic, that adds retail and housing choices, and that becomes a community and cultural destination

Conclusion Carpe PM Seize the Day!

Key Websites http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/commu nity/village/ http://www.njfuture.org (Look in Issues Section for more on transportation) http://policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/tod/index.html http://www.princetononline/pjnc/ http://www.livableplaces.org/policy/todincen tives.html http://www.transitvillages.org www.reconnectingamerica.org

more Livable Places and Open Spaces George S. Hawkins www.njfuture.org