IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION OF TWO CUCUMBER (Cucumis sativum L.) GENOTYPES: EFFECTS OF EXPLANT TYPES AND CULTURE MEDIUM

Similar documents
Effect of Genotype, Explant Type and Culture Medium on Shoot Regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro

Successful Regeneration of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum Annuum l.) in an Airlift Bioreactor: Effect of Medium Phase and Genotype

In Vitro Regeneration of Parthenocarpic Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Plantlet Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis in Four Species of Crocus

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences DIRECT REGENERATION FROM EMBRYO CULTURES OF LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM MILL CV PUSA RUBY ABSTRACT

Organogenic plant regeneration via callus induction in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Role of genotypes, growth regulators and explants

In Vitro Microcorm Formation in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)

CHAPTER 2. IN VITRO REGENERATION OF Gerbera jamesonii Bolus Ex. Hook f. Previous research has proven that Gerbera jamesonii could successfully be

Production of Callus Mediated Gynogenic Haploids in Winter Squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) and Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.)

ANTHER CULTURE OF PEPPER (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.) : COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EFFECT OF THE GENOTYPE

Investigation of Plant Growth Regulators Effects on Callus Induction and Shoot Regeneration of Bunium persicum (Boiss.) B. Fedtsch.

Plant Regeneration via Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis

Influence of Genotype Source on the In Vitro Regeneration Ability of Malaysian Chilli Varieties

ORGANOGENESIS IN CHRYSANTHEMUM MORIFOLIUM RAMAT (CULTIVAR ROMICA ) CALLUS CULTURES SMARANDA VÂNTU

Plant regeneration of Anthurium andreanum cv Rubrun

REGENERATION SYSTEMS FOR PYRAMIDING DISEASE RESISTANCE INTO WALNUT ROOTSTOCKS

The effects of BA and NAA on multiplication of Butterwort (Pinguicula gigantea) in vitro

Original Papers Plant Tissue Culture Letters, 11(3), (1994) INouE**, Koji NoMuRA***, Seiko TAKAHASHi**, OsHIMA* and Kiyoshi MASUDA**

In vitro regeneration in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and characterization of plant-regenerants

Effect of Cytokinins on Multiple Shoot Regeneration from Leaf Derived Callus of Inula

IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF THE BALKAN ENDEMIC SPECIES VERBASCUM ERIOPHORUM GODR. Abstract. Introduction

Researches regarding bitter melon (Momordica charantia) in vitro regeneration

Regeneration potential of seedling explants of chilli (Capsicum annuum)

In vitro regeneration performance of Corchorus olitorius

Seed Culture of Aromatic Rice Varieties Under Salt Stress

Effect of BA NAA and 2,4-D on Micropropagation of Jiaogulan (Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino)

Plant regeneration of natural tetraploid Trifolium pratense L

MICROPROPAGATION OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA L. CV SWAT-II) THROUGH SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS

Genetic and non genetic factors affecting callus induction and regeneration in sugarcane Sobhakumari V.P 1, Sreedivya M.J. 2 and Sanu Mary Abraham 3

MICROPROPAGATION OF JATROPHA CURCAS (L.)

Micropropagation of Lilium formolongo via leaf explants

IN VITRO INDUCTION OF HAPLOID IN EGGPLANT (SOLANUM MELONGENA L.)

TISSUE CULTURE II. Organogenesis. PlSc 300 LAB Learn tissue culture techniques that promote organ formation.

In vitro REGENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (Vigna radiata L.) FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS

IN VITRO MUTATION STUDIES IN PAPAYA (CARICA PAPAYA L.)

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON SHOOT INDUCTION OF Orthosiphon aristatus Boldingh.

Keywords: Agarwood, satalum, resin, micropropagation, tok

Development of a suitable plant regeneration protocol of cotton cultivar variety in comparison to non cultivar Coker

High Frequency Shoots Regeneration from Cotyledon Explants of Teasle Gourd Via Organogenesis

Somaclonal Variation in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Chemical Mutagens

In vitro propagation of Musa sp (Banana)

Rapid Micropropagation and Callus Induction of Catharanthus roseus in Vitro Using Different Explants

EFFECTIVE CALLUS INDUCTION AND PLANT REGENERATION IN BRASSICA NAPUS (L.) VAR DGS-1

The application of leafy explant micropropagation protocol in enhancing the multiplication ef ciency of Alstroemeria

American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 6(4): , 2012 ISSN Somatic Embryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in Amla

Regulation of Callogenesis using Cotyledon and Hypocotyls explants of Cassia senna

Gregor Mendel Foundation Proceedings 2007:

MICROPROPAGATION OF CHRYSANTHEMUM (CHRYSANTHEMUM MORIFOLIUM) USING SHOOT TIP AS EXPLANT

FACILE PLANT REGENERATION FROM TOMATO LEAVES INDUCED WITH SPECTINOMYCIN

IN VITRO BULBLET INDUCTION FROM BULB SCALES OF ENDANGERED ORNAMENTAL PLANT MUSCARI AZUREUM

In vitro regeneration system in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) for stress tolerant somaclone selection

IN VITRO ANSWER OF BULGARIAN PEPPER (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.) VARIETIES. Velichka RODEVA, Stanislava GROZEVA and Velichka TODOROVA

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS AND REGENERATION OF PLANTLET IN SAFFRON, CROCUS SATIVUS L.

Received : Accepted:

DEVELOPMENT OF EFFICIENT CALLUS INITIATION OF MALTA (Citrus sinensis) THROUGH TISSUE CULTURE

Effect of Growing Conditions of Rice Donor Plants on Anther Culture in Vitro

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences RAPID IN VITRO PROPAGATION TECHNIQUE FOR SUGARCANE VARIETY 018

MICROPHOPAGATION OF DATE PALM (PHOENIX TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EFFECTS OF GROWTH REGULATORS OVER THE IN VITRO MORPHOGENETIC REACTION AT ORIGANUM VULGARE L.

In Vitro Morphogenetic Response of Moringa oleifera Lam. Leaf Petiole Explant to Cytokinin and Auxin Concentrations

International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production (IJSCP)

IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION STUDIES IN BRINJAL

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS AND SHOOT REGENERATION INDUCED IN CUCUMBER LEAVES

Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Immature Embryo Explant Obtained from Female Female Momordica dioica

THE INDUCTION OF ROOT AND SHOOT MORPHOGENESIS IN Phaseolus vulgaris TISSUE CULTURES*

Plant Tissue Culture. Dr. Alain Lemansour UAE University Date Palm Development Research Unit Dept.

HAPLOID PLANTLET REGENERATION THROUGH ANTHER CULTURE IN OILSEED Brassica species

In vitro regeneration of watermelon seed segments

DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur B. Sc. V Semester LBC 503 (Plant Tissue Culture)

ESTABLISHMENT OF AN IN VITRO REGENERATION SYSTEM SUITABLE FOR AGROBACTERIUM MEDIATED TRANSFORMATION OF KABULI TYPE CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.

IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF EGYPTIAN DATE PALM: 11-DIRECT AND INDIRECT SHOOT PROLIFERATION FROM SHOOT-TIP EXPLANTS OF Phoenix dactylifera L. CV. ZAGHLOOL.

In Vitro Regeneration of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) Variety Surya

MICROPROPAGATION AND MORPHOGENESIS OF ARRACACHA (ARRACACIA XANTHORRHIZA BANCROFT)

Effect of explant type and growth regulators on in vitro micropropagation of Begonia rex

Polysiphonia. Life cycle of Polysiphonia Dr. Purnima Saikia, Asst.Prof Dept of Botany2017

INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON IN VITRO CLONAL PROPAGATION OF DENDROBIUM SONIA EARSAKUL

Regeneration of the Medicinal Plant Ruta Graveolens L. from Hypocotyl

Appendix Ex vitro performance of peanut plants from TDZ-pretreated seeds

4.1. Introduction Use of genetic engineering for crop improvement allows introgression of useful agronomic traits without altering the other

IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF BITTER GOURD (Momordica charantia L.)

Interim Report on Breeding the New Vetiver Variety for Cold Tolerance by Biotechnology

In vitro Conservation of Rose Coloured Leadwort: Effect of Mannitol on Growth of Plantlets

Tissue culture response of different wheat genotypes, environmental effect and association with plant traits

In Vitro Propagation of Jojoba [Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider] through Nodal Segments of Female Plants

In vitro Plant Regeneration of Withania somnifera. Ujjwala Supe, Fanisha Dhote and M.G. Roymon

Effect of BA and 2iP on Shoot Proliferation and Somaclonal Variation of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis in vitro Culture

IN VITRO GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF DENDROBIUM HYBRID ORCHID. H. KHATUN 1, M. M. KHATUN 2, M. S. BISWAS 3 M. R. KABIR 4 AND M. AL-AMIN 5 Abstract

Summary and conclusion

In Vitro Formation of Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida Hort.) Plantlets through Excised Scape Cultures

The influence of food colorants on the growth and development of in vitro plantlets belonging to different Romanian varieties

IN VITRO BUD CULTURE OF KINNOW TREE

GENERATION AND SELECTION OF PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI RESISTANT AVOCADO ROOTSTOCKS THROUGH SOMACLONAL VARIATION

Agrobacterium-mediated Rice Transformation from Mature Seeds

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

application in propagating Butterfly attracting Plants

Genetic Response of Different Genotypes of Sugarcane at Different Tissue Culture Techniques Combinations

EFFECT OF BENZYLAMINO PURINE AND NAPHTHALENE ACETIC ACID ON CALLUS AND PROTOCORM FORMATION OF DENDROBIUM CV. BANYAT PINK

Rapid micropropagation of Cucumis sativus var. Dastgerdi (Iranian cultivar) by Node Culture Technique

We observed a better response to the hormone treatments with the

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS OF DREPANOSTACHYUM FALCATUM AN IMPORTANT HILL BAMBOO-A RAPID MEANS OF MICROPROPAGATION

Transcription:

UDC 575.630 DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1402485G Original scientific paper IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION OF TWO CUCUMBER (Cucumis sativum L.) GENOTYPES: EFFECTS OF EXPLANT TYPES AND CULTURE MEDIUM Stanislava GROZEVA and Nikolay VELKOV Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Grozeva S. and, N. Velkov (2014): In vitro plant regeneration of two cucumber (Cucumis sativum L.) genotypes: effects of explant types and culture medium-. Genetika vol 46, No2, 485-493. The effect of different phytohormone concentrations on callusogenesis and organogenesis in two cucumber genotypes were studied. It was established that the rate of plant regeneration depends on genotype, explant type and culture medium. Hypocotyls were found to be more responsive than cotyledons in morphogenesis. In vitro planlet-regenerants have been obtained in hypocotyls explants on culture medium with 1.0 and 2.0 mgl - 1 BA for cultivar Gergana and in 1.0 and 3.0 mgl -1 K line 15B. Induction of regeneration in cotyledons were established only in cultivar Gergana on culture medium supplemented with 3.0 mgl -1 BA and in combination of 0.5 mgl - 1 IAA. Key words: cucumber, callusogenesis, genotype, plant growth regulators, organogenesis INTRODUCTION Conventional genetic improvement of cucumber is limited because it is time-consuming and leading to homogeneity and results in narrowing the genetic potential. In vitro methods especially plants tissue culture are an essential tool for creation of new genetic variation and unique recombination (PLADER et al., 1998; RODEVA et al., 2006; TODOROVA et al., 2013). Development of rapid and efficient regeneration system can accelerate the process via somaclonal variation, in vitro mutagenesis and genetic engineering (NANASATO et al., 2013). Successful induction of plant regeneration in cucumber has been achieved from different explant types, genotypes and culture media (MOHINDDIN et al., 2005; SONG et al., 2007; VASUDEVAN et al., 2008; UGANDHAR et al., 2013). Plant growth regulator BA alone or in combination with low concentration of auxins IAA and NAA stimulate organogenesis and shoot induction (SELVARAJ et al., 2007; UGANDHAR et al., 2011). MOHINDDIN et al. (2005) and AYYAPPAN et al. (2006) proved that silver nitrate (AgNO 3 ) significant increase the frequency of shoot induction in different cucumber varieties. Better regeneration answer has been observed by USMAN et al. Corresponding author: Stanislava Grozeva, Department of Breeding, Variety Maintenance and Introduction, Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Brezovsko shosse 32, 4003 Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Tel.: +35932952296, Fax: +35932960177, e-mail: stanislava_grozeva@abv.bg;

486 GENETIKA, Vol. 46, No 2, 485-493, 2014 (2011) in leaf explants compared to cotyledons. In contrast, CURUK et al. (2003) and KOSE & KOÇ (2003) recommended cotyledons and hypocotyls as explant types. However cucumber regeneration via callus formation is still limited due to the low regeneration frequency and genotype dependence of the process (SELVARAJ et al., 2006). This experimental work is aimed to study in vitro regeneration potential of the cotyledon and hypocotyl explants of two cucumber genotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The experiment was carried out in the Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute Plovdiv during 2012-2013. Two cucumber genotypes inbred line 15B and cultivar Gergana were used. Seeds of the two cucumber genotypes were surface sterilized in 5% calcium hypochlorite solution for 1 hour and rinsing three-times and sterile dh 2 O. After that the seeds were sown on MURASHIGE & SKOOG (1962) (MS). Explants of cotyledons (0.5 cm) and hypocotyls (1.0 cm) were excised from 5-7 days old in vitro grown seedlings. The explants were cultivated in Petri dishes on basal medium contained major and minor salts by MS, vitamins as in B5 medium (GAMBORG et al., 1968), 3% sucrose, 0.7% agar and supplemented with plant growth regulators N 6 -Benzyladenine (1, 2 and 3 mgl -1 ) (BA) and Kinetin (1, 2 and 3 mgl -1 ) (K) alone or in combination with 0.5 mgl -1 Indolil-3-acetic acid (IAA). The explants were incubated in growth chamber at 25ºC ± 1ºC temperature, a photosynthetic proton flux density (PPFD) of 200 µmol m -2 s -1, 16/8 h photoperiod and subcultured at intervals of 15 days on the same medium. The experiment was carried out in three replications with 20 explants in each for the different genotypes, medium variant and explant type. The callusogenesis, organogenesis, regeneration frequency (% explants with regeneration) and number of regenerants per explant were examined for a period of 90 days. The experimental data were calculated by Duncan s multiple range test to confirm statistical significant of difference among the means. Three-way analysis of variance were applied to show effect of genotype, culture medium and explant type, and interaction between main factors on callusogenesis and regeneration frequency. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to estimate similarities between studied variants. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Data presented in Table 1 show that all cultured cotyledon explants from two studied genotypes reacted with callusogenesis on culture medium supplemented with BA (1-3 mgl -1 ) and 0.5 mgl -1 IAA. Callus formation were not established in cotyledons on medium containing K or with combination of IAA in line 15B and in medium variant containing 3.0 mgl -1 K alone or in combination of 0.5 mgl -1 IAA in cultivar Gergana. In contrast, hypocotyls reacted with callusogenesis in all medium variants in ranged from 80.0% to 100% of cultivated explants. These results are supported by the data for three-way analysis that the process of callusogenesis influence mainly of explants types (33.17%) followed by culture medium and interaction of both factors (22.87% and 23.88% respectively) (Table 2). Hypocotyls were found to be more responsive than cotyledons in organogenesis. In line 15B organogenic reaction in hypocotyls was registered from 0.0% to 100% of explants while in cultivar Gergana from 0.0% to 93.3%. In cotyledon explants of both genotypes organogenesis with the highest frequency was observed in culture medium supplemented with 3.0 mgl -1 BA

S. GROZEVA et al: IN VITROPLANT REGENERATION OF CUCUMBER 487 (41.7% and 76.7%). Organogenic reaction in cotyledons of line 15B was registered also in medium variant containing 2.0 mgl -1 BA and 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA (33.3% and 10.0% respectively) while in cultivar Gergana in 1.0 mgl -1 BA and combination BA 1.0 and 3.0 mgl -1 with 0.5 mgl -1 IAA (15.0%, 25.0% and 66.7% respectively). According to MOHIUDDIN et al. (2005) regeneration capability of cucumber strongly depends on explants type and genotype even the culture conditions were optimal and established that distal cotyledons as less responsive. In contrast, different reaction between cotyledon and hypocotyls segments was not observed (UGANDHAR et al., 2011). Table 1. Effect of culture medium on callusogenesis and organogenesis in cotyledon and hypocotyl explants by two cucumber genotypes Explant types Culture medium variants 15В Gergana 15В Gergana Cotyledon Hypocotyl Callusogenesis Organogenesis 1.0 mgl -1 BA 71.7 c 90.0 ab 100 a 100 a 2.0 mgl -1 BA 80.0 bc 53.3 c 100 a 80.0 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA 75.0 c 76.7 b 100 a 80.0 b 1.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 86.7 ab 90.0 b 93.3 ab 2.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 81.7 b 100 a 90.0 ab 3.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 0.0 d 100 a 100 a 1.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 2.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 93.3 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 1.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 50.0 c 100 a 100 a 2.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 56.7 c 100 a 100 a 3.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 0.0 d 100 a 100 a 1.0 mgl -1 BA 0.0 d 15.0 d 23.3 d 93.3 a 2.0 mgl -1 BA 33.3 b 0.0 e 10.0 ef 80.0 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA 41.7 a 76.7 a 10.0 ef 0.0 e 1.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 0.0 e 90.0 b 0.0 e 2.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 0.0 e 50.0 c 0.0 e 3.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 d 0.0 e 100 a 0.0 e 1.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 25.0 c 6.7 ef 83.3 b 2.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 0.0 e 13.3 e 36.7 d 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 10.0 c 66.7 b 0.0 f 53.3 c 1.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 0.0 e 50.0 c 0.0 e 2.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 0.0 e 50.0 c 3.3 e 3.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 d 0.0 e 50.0 c 3.3 e a,b,c.p 0.05 Duncan s Multiple Range Test

488 GENETIKA, Vol. 46, No 2, 485-493, 2014 Table 2. Three-way analysis of variance and influence of variation factors on the callusugenes depend on genotypes, explant types and culture media Source Sum of Mean df Squares Square F Sig. Power of influence (η%) Genotype (A) 188995.7 1 4021.2 60.48 *** 1.67 Explant type (B) 831896.0 1 831896.0 12511.02 *** 33.17 Culture medium (C) 3258.5 11 3258.5 49.01 *** 22.87 A x B 64812.7 1 64812.7 974.73 *** 3.31 A x C 44685.2 11 4062.3 61.09 *** 6.72 B x C 6466.8 11 6466.8 97.26 *** 23.88 A x B x C 13122.7 11 1193.0 17.94 *** 5.12 Error 46651.9 96 4241.1 3.27 Total 195379.0 143 R Squared = 0.967 (Adjusted R Squared = 0.951) Table 3. Regeneration efficiency in two cucumber genotypes Explant types Regeneration Regenerants/ Explant Culture medium variants 15В Gergana 15В Gergana Cotyledon Hypocotyl 1.0 mgl -1 BA 0.0 15.0 c 0.0 b 73.3 a 2.0 mgl -1 BA 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 10.0 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA 0.0 33.3 b 0.0 b 0.0 b 1.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 0.0 d 13.3 a 0.0 b 2.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 0.0 b 3.0 mgl -1 K 0.0 0.0 d 10.0 ab 0.0 b 1.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 6.7 cd 0.0 b 0.0 b 2.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 3.3 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 61.7 a 0.0 b 0.0 b 1.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 0.0 b 2.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 0.0 b 3.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.0 0.0 d 0.0 b 0.0 b 1.0 mgl -1 BA 0.00 0.15 c 0.00 b 0.90 a 2.0 mgl -1 BA 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.10 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA 0.00 0.33 b 0.00 b 0.00 b 1.0 mgl -1 K 0.00 0.00 c 0.13 a 0.00 b 2.0 mgl -1 K 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.00 b 3.0 mgl -1 K 0.00 0.00 c 0.10 ab 0.00 b 1.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.07 c 0.00 b 0.00 b 2.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.03 b 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.75 a 0.00 b 0.00 b 1.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.00 b 2.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.00 b 3.0 mgl -1 K + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA 0.00 0.00 c 0.00 b 0.00 b a,b,c.p 0.05 Duncan s Multiple Range Test

S. GROZEVA et al: IN VITROPLANT REGENERATION OF CUCUMBER 489 Statistical differences in regeneration potential were established in the explants depending on the cucumber genotypes and medium variant (Table 3). Regeneration ability varied from 0.0% to 73.3%. The highest regeneration activity was observed in hypocotyls from cultivar Gergana of medium containing 1.0 mgl -1 BA (73.3%) and in cotyledons of medium variant containing 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA (61.7%) (Fig.1). Regeneration answer was not established in cotyledon explants of line 15B in all medium variants. Data from three-way analysis of variance indicated that regeneration ability strongly influence by interaction of both factors genotype and culture medium variant (24.16%), while effect of explants type was not statistically proven (Table 4). callusogenesis regeneration Plant-regenerant Figure 1. In vitro plant regeneration in hypocotyls of cultivar Gergana Table 4. Three-way analysis of variance and influence of variation factors on the regeneration depend on genotypes, explant types and culture media Source Power of Sum of Mean df F Sig. influence Squares Square (η%) Genotype (A) 29638.9 1 630.6 21.62 *** 6.24 Explant type (B) 3211.1 1 3211.1 110.10 ns 0.01 Culture medium (C) 2025.0 11 2025.0 69.43 *** 20.50 A x B 2.8 1 2.8 0.10 * 0.55 A x C 6651.4 11 604.7 20.73 *** 24.16 B x C 177.8 11 177.8 6.10 *** 20.22 A x B x C 7837.5 11 712.5 24.43 *** 19.68 Error 6559.7 96 596.3 8.63 Total 32438.9 143 R Squared = 0,914 (Adjusted R Squared = 0,871)

490 GENETIKA, Vol. 46, No 2, 485-493, 2014 The highest number of plantlets/explant in cultivar Gergana was obtained in hypocotyl segments on culture medium with 1.0 mgl -1 BA and in cotyledons on medium variant with 3.0 mgl -1 BA + 0.5 mgl -1 IAA (0.90 and 0.75 respectively). In line 15B developed plantlets was established only in hypocotyls segments on medium variants containing 1 and 3 mgl -1 K (0.13 and 0.10 respectively) (Table 3). UGANDHAR et al. (2011) reported that maximum number of plantlet regeneration was induced in culture medium supplemented with 3.0 mgl -1 BA and 0.5 mgl -1 IAA. The authors suggested that low level of IAA might have triggered the action of BA/K in a proper way for inducing more number of shoots per explants. The results obtained in the present work established different reaction of both explant types and combination 3.0 mgl -1 BA and 0.5 mgl -1 IAA was better for cotyledon while 1.0 mgl -1 BA or K for hypocotyls. Probably the genotype is a main factor influence the regeneration process. Differences observed in regeneration frequency in the both explant types may be due the influence of endogenous growth regulators, the position of explant in the plant, and the tissue they consist. ANANTHAKRISHNAN et al. (2003) established small shoots and buds regenerated only on the most proximal cotyledon edge in Cucurbita pepo. Position-dependent of regeneration capacity of explants was proved in Cucumis sativum (MOHIUDDIN et al., 2005). On the base of established differences in response of the two explant types and for define similarities/dissimilarities in reaction of the two cucumber genotypes (Gergana and 15B) in relation of callusogenesis, organogenesis and regeneration processes, of 12 culture medium variants it was performed cluster analysis. The studied culture medium variants and cucumber genotypes were distributed in two groups according to their distances (Fig. 2). The first group consisted of two types of culture medium 3 mgl -l BA and 3 mgl -l BA +0.5 IAA on line 15B. The second group included all other medium variants. The results show that the medium variants contained in the first cluster are more perspective for optimization of regeneration process in cotyledon explants in different cucumber genotypes. The response of the hypocotyl segments was different (Fig. 3). It was observed two clusters, but the first contained only one variant (1 mgl -l BA, cultivar Gergana) where regeneration processes were with the highest frequency. The second cluster was divided into two subgroups. The first subgroup included variants 1 and 3 mgl -l K in 15B and 2 mgl -l BA in Gergana. All other culture medium variants formed the second subgroup. The first subgroup was characterized by good callusogenesis and poor ability for organogenesis and regeneration, while the second subgroup comprised those medium variants in which were not induced regeneration reactions or the answer was sporadic. The results indicate that the experimental work should be continue for development of additional combinations associated with variants contained in the first cluster. As a result of this study different regeneration response of hypocotyl and cotyledon explants compare to culture medium variants were established. Cultivar Gergana displayed the highest regeneration response in cotyledon explants on culture medium supplemented with 3.0 mgl -1 BA and 0.5 mgl -1 IAA, while in hypocotyls on medium variant containing 1.0 mgl -1 BA. In line 15B regeneration of plantlets were obtained only in hypocotyls segments on medium variants with 1.0 and 3.0 mgl -1 K.

S. GROZEVA et al: IN VITROPLANT REGENERATION OF CUCUMBER 491 Figure 2. Hierarchical cluster analysis on the base response of two cucumber genotypes to their possibilities of callus formation, organogenesis and regeneration dipped on media cultures in cotyledon stage. Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) Figure 3. Hierarchical cluster analysis on the base response of two cucumber genotypes to their possibilities of callus formation dipped on media cultures in hypocotyl stage. Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups)

492 GENETIKA, Vol. 46, No 2, 485-493, 2014. Received March 03 st, 2014 Accepted July 22 th, 2014 REFERENCES ANANTHAKRISHNAN G., X. XIA, C. ELMAN, S. SINGER, H.S. PARIS, A. GAL-ON, V. GABA (2003): Shoot production in squash (Cucurbita pepo) by in vitro organogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 21, 739-746. AYYAPPAN V., S. NATESAN, G. ANDY, C.W. CHOI, M. MARKANDAN, K. SAMPATH (2006): Effect of ethylene inhibitors on in vitro shoot multiplication and their impact on ethylene production in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Research Journal of Botany 1, 110-117. CURUK S., G. ANANTHAKRISHNAN, S. SINGER, X. XIA, C. ELMAN, D. NESTLE, S. CETINER, V. GABA (2003): Regeneration in vitro from the hypocotil of Cucunis species produced almost exclusively diploid shoots, and doss not require light. HortScience 38, 105-109. GAMBORG O.L., R. MILLER, K. OJIMA (1968): Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50, 148-151. KOSE E., N.K. KOÇ (2003): Agrobacterium-medited transformation on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and plant regeneration. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2, 56-62. MOHINDDIN A.K.M., Z.C. ABDULLAH, M.K.U. CHOWDHURY, S. NAPIS (2005): Enhancement of adventitious shoot regeneration in Cucumis sativus L. using AgNO 3. Plant Tissue Culture 15, 15-23. MURASHIGE S., F. SKOOG (1962): A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays wilh tabacco tisuee cultures. Phisiologiae Plantarum 15, 473-497. NANASATO Y., K. KONAGAYA, A. OKUZAKI, M. TSUDA, Y. TABEI (2013): Improvement of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by combination of vacuum infiltration and co-cultivation on filter paper wicks. Plant Biotechnology Reports 7, 267-276. PLADER W., S. MALEPSZY, W. BURZA, Z. RUSINOWSKI (1998): The relationship between the regeneration system and genetic variability in the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 103, 9-15. RODEVA V., S. GROZEVA, V. TODOROVA (2006): In vitro answer of Bulgarian pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Genetika, Serbia 38, 129-136. SELVARAJ N., A. VASUDEVAN, M. MANICKAVASAGAM, A. GANAPATHI (2006): In vitro organogenesis and plant formation in cucumber. Biologia Plantarum 50, 123-126. SELVARAJ N., A. VASUDEVAN, M. MANICKAVASAGAM, S. KASTHURIRENGAN, A. GANAPATHI (2007): High frequency shoot regeneration from cotyledon explants of cucumber via organogenesis. Scientia Horticulturae 112, 2-8. SONG H., Q.F. LOU, X.D. LUO, J.N. WOLUKAU, W.P. DIAO, C.T. QIAN, J.F. CHEN (2007): Regeneration of doubled haploid plants by androgenesis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 90, 245-254. TODOROVA V., S. GROZEVA, V. RODEVA, S. MASHEVA (2013): Breeding evaluation of pepper lines obtained by in vitro anther culture. Genetika, Serbia 45, 601-610. UGANDHAR T., M. VENKATESHWARRLU, G. BEGUM, T. SRILATHA, K. JAGANMOHANREDDY (2011): In Vitro plant regeneration of Cucumber (Cucumis sativum (L.) from cotyledon and hypocotyl explants. Science Research Reporter 1, 164-169. UGANDHAR T., T. SRILATHA, M.A. IMRAN (2013): Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Cucumber (Cucumis sativum L.). International Journal of Integrative sciences, Innovation and Technology 2, 29-33. VASUDEVAN A, N. SELVARAJ, A. GANAPATHI, S. KASTHURIRENGAN, R.V. ANBAZHAGAN, M. MANICKAVASAGAM, C.W. CHOI (2008): Leucine and spermidine enhance shoot differentiation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 44, 300-306.

S. GROZEVA et al: IN VITROPLANT REGENERATION OF CUCUMBER 493 IN VITRO REGENERACIJA BILJAKA DVA GENOTIPA KRASTAVCA (Cucumis sativum L.): EFEKTI TIPA EKSPLANTA I TIPA PODLOGE GAJENJA Stanislava GROZEVA i Nikolay VELKOV Maritsa Institut za istraživanje povrća - Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bugarska Izvod Vršena su ispitivanja efekta različitih koncentracija fitohormona na kalusogenezu I organogenezu kod dva genotipa krastavca. Utvrđeno je da brzina regeneracije zavisi od genotipa, tipa eksplanta, medijuma. U morfogenezi odgovor hipokotila je brži nego kod kotiledona. In vitro regenerisani eksplanti su dobijeni kod hipokotila na podlozi sa 1.0 i 2.0 mgl -1 BA za genotip Gergana i 1.0 i 3.0 mgl -1 K linije 15B. Indukcija kotiledona je dobijena samo kod genotipa Gergana na podlozi sa 3.0 mgl -1 BA i u kombinaciji sa 0.5 mgl -1 IAA. Primljeno 06. III 2014. Odobreno 22. VII. 2014.