Department of Planning & Development Services

Similar documents
Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

M E M O R A N D U M. Consider a recommendation of a site plan for Sherwin Williams, a proposed approximately 4,500 square-foot paint store.

Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

13. New Construction. Context & Character

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Urban Planning and Land Use

Urban Planning and Land Use

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Urban Planning and Land Use

Historic District Commission Staff Report May 3 rd, 2017

ARTICLE 27 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICTS

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

First Draft for Village of Antioch Staff Review Only 5/27/2010

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)

TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Historic District Commission Staff Report February 1 st, 2017

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. CS Commercial, LLC 1337 Riverside Avenue, Unit 1 Fort Collins, CO 80524

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis September 17, 2018

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-15 Residential to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Design Guidelines Checklist

Regulations, of the Dallas City Code by creating a new Division S-105; establishing use

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

DOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Residential Design Guidelines

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0701 APPLICANT: Hanky, LLC

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Motor City Re-Store Design Guidelines

Architectural Review Board Report

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

ARTICLE XIII USE PROVISIONS. Section Mall of Georgia Overlay District Requirements:

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006)

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE. A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review

CHAPTER 11 HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

New Berlin City Center Concept Review PDQ Food Stores, Inc

SITE PLANNING. USC Village will be a mixeduse urban environment. creating a common ground with the surrounding community. Our planning goals include:

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER OF APPROVAL

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

Town of Essex Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown Harrow and Essex Centre May 2014

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

P: Site Plan Approval

BACKGROUND PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Memo

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Town Center Design Guidelines

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

Statement of Intent Proposed Development Five Forks Athletics Scuffletown Rd, Greenville SC

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Transcription:

Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T April 15, 2015 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ZA15-012 Site Plan for Block 2R1, Lot 4, Southlake Town Square Cooper and Stebbins is requesting approval of a Site Plan for the development of an approximately 12,003 square foot single-story retail/restaurant building on approximately 4.06 acres located at 1240 Main Street. SPIN Neighborhood #8 DETAILS: Cooper and Stebbins is requesting approval of a Site Plan for Block 2R1, Lot 4 of Southlake Town Square located on the southwest corner of State Street and Prospect Street for the development of an approximately 12,003 square foot one-story building. As proposed, the applicant is showing the building to contain two spaces, an approximately 8,000 square foot retail space and an approximately 4,000 square foot restaurant space. The development of this building will remove fifty-two (52) parking spaces located where the current building is being proposed, two (2) of those spaces being on-street parking spaces. The building façade is proposed to be made up of primarily brick, stucco, glass and cast stone. The materials being proposed are similar to other buildings within Southlake Town Square and share similar architectural themes. A site plan was previously approved by City Council in July of 2008 (Planning Case ZA08-039) for an approximately 46,900 square foot two-story building containing office and retail uses. The location of this approved building would have removed 106 parking spaces. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 2, 2015 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (F) Full Size Plans (For Commissioners Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Daniel Cortez (817) 748-8070 ZA15-012

BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LAND USE CATEGORY: CURRENT ZONING: HISTORY: Town Square Ventures, LP Cooper and Stebbins 1240 Main Street Lot 4, Block 2R1, Southlake Town Square Phase One Town Center DT Downtown District - On August 19, 1997 the City Council approved a Development Plan under Planning Case ZA97-099 for Southlake Town Square Phase I. - On August 19, 1997 the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat under Planning Case ZA97-101 for Southlake Town Square. - On December 18, 1997 the Planning & Zoning Commission approved a Final Plat under Planning Case ZA97-162 for Southlake Town Square Phase I. - On August 1, 2000 the City Council approved a Plat Revision under Planning Case ZA00-070 for Block 2, Southlake Town Square Phase I. - On August 7, 2001 the City Council approved a Plat Revision under Planning Case ZA01-084 for Blocks 1, 2R, 3R, 4 and 5 Southlake Town Square Phase I. - On July 2, 2008 the City Council approved a Revised Site Plan under Planning Case ZA08-039 for Block 2R1 of Southlake Town Square. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Town Center. The Town Center land use designation is defined within Southlake 2030 as the following: The Town Center land use designation is intended to enhance and promote the development of the community s downtown. The goal is to create an attractive, pedestrian-oriented environment that becomes the center of community life in Southlake. It may include compatibly designed retail, office, cultural, civic, recreational, hotel and residential uses. All uses shall be developed with a great attention to design detail and will be Attachment A ZA15-012 Page 1

integrated into one cohesive district or into distinct sub-districts, each with its own unique characteristics. A mix of different uses is encouraged to create a vibrant, lively, and unique environment. TREE PRESERVATION: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: STAFF COMMENTS: There are five (5) existing Live Oaks and four (4) Red Maples that are proposed to be transplanted to new and existing landscape islands within the parking lot of Block 2R1, therefore preserving all trees affected by the development of this building. The DT Zoning District does not require the applicant to preserve any minimum amount of trees but rather makes their tree preservation plan subject to City Council s approval. April 9, 2015; Approved (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 2, 2015 and the staff report dated April 2, 2015. The City has adopted Downtown District design guidelines that should be considered when reviewing elevation changes such as the one being proposed and are as follows: Site Design and Parking Site Design: In order to create attractive, pedestrian friendly streets and provide street-level activity and interest, buildings shall: be built to or close to the sidewalk have entrances oriented to the sidewalk for ease of pedestrian access be located in such a manner as to minimize conflicts between pedestrians and automobiles Building Orientation: Buildings shall be oriented toward the major street front with the primary entrance located on that street Corner Lots: At key intersections, buildings located on corner lots shall utilize variations in building massing to emphasize street intersections as points of interest in the district. Parking: On-street parking (parallel or angled) shall be permitted in the Downtown district. Off-street surface parking shall be predominantly located behind buildings and accessed by alleys or rear drives when ever possible. Building Massing, Scale & Rhythm Building Massing & Scale: A building s massing is its exterior volume and its scale is the relationship of its overall size and its component parts with its adjoining buildings, spaces, and people. A building s massing shall relate to its site, use, and to the massing of adjacent buildings. A building s massing shall serve to define entry points and help orient pedestrians. The scale of individual building facade components shall relate to one another and the human scale, particularly at the street level. Attachment A ZA15-012 Page 2

Buildings and/or facades shall emphasize and frame or terminate important vistas. Building Rhythm: A building s rhythm is the pattern created by the regular recurrence or alteration of its constituent architectural components. Non-residential and mixed use buildings in Downtown, to the extent practicable, shall maintain a 25 or multiples of 25 building facade widths. Variations in the rhythms within individual building facades shall be achieved within any block of building facades. Breaks in the predominant rhythm may also be used to reinforce changes in massing and important elements such as building entrances or pedestrian pass-throughs. Storefronts Retailers located at the street level primarily use storefronts to orient and advertise merchandise to customers. Retail buildings shall provide street-level pedestrian-oriented uses at the ground floor level. Storefronts on facade treatments that span multiple tenants shall use architecturally compatible materials, colors, details, awnings, signage, and lighting fixtures. Entrances The design and location of building entrances in the Downtown district are important to help define the pedestrian environment and create retail-friendly environments. Entrances shall be easily identifiable as primary points of access to buildings. Building entrances may be defined and articulated by architectural elements such as lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns, porticos, porches, overhangs, railings, balustrades, and others as appropriate. All building elements should be compatible with the architectural style, materials, colors, and details of the building as a whole. Entrances to upper level uses may be defined and integrated into the design of the overall building facade. Building Materials Exterior finish building materials shall consist of: Masonry, which is defined as brick, cast stone, glass fiber reinforced concrete, glass fiber reinforced gypsum, and split face concrete masonry units Stucco, including synthetic stucco (exterior insulation finishing system - EFIS) Glazed ceramic and porcelain tile Fiber reinforced plastic (with the exception of plastic or vinyl siding) - used for exterior building components, including but not limited to: cornice and entablature elements, decorative columns and pilasters, storefront trim, railings, and balustrades, spandrel panels, and similar elements. Attachment A ZA15-012 Page 3

Painted steel and aluminum, cast iron, bronze, brass, copper (including terne coated) Roofing materials (visible from any public right-of-way): copper, factory finished painted metal, slate, synthetic slate, terra cotta, cement tile, glass fiber shingles. Materials other than those listed above may be used for architectural trim and accent applications including, but not limited to, cornices and decorative brackets, frieze panels, decorative lintels, shutters, and porch or balcony railings. Included in this report is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 2, 2015 under Attachment D. N:\Community Development\MEMO\2015 Cases\012 - SP - Block 2R1, Lot 4 Southlake Town Square\Staff Report Attachment A ZA15-012 Page 4

ZA15-012 Attachment B Page 1

Plans and Support Information Previously Approved Site Plan (ZA08-039) Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 1

Previously Approved Site Plan (ZA08-039) Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 2

Previously Approved Site Plan (ZA08-039) Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 3

Proposed Site Plan Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 4

Proposed Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 5

Proposed Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 6

Proposed Landscape Plan Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 7

Attachment C ZA15-012 Page 8

SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY : ZA15-012 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/02/2015 Project Name: Lot 4, Block 2R1, Southlake Town Square APPLICANT: Cooper and Stebbins ENGINEER: Brockette, Davis, Drake, Inc. Frank Bliss Jim Riley 1256 Main Street 4144 N. Central Expressway Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75204 Phone: (817) 329-8400 Phone: (214) 824-3647 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/23/2015 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Daniel Cortez, AICP Principal Planner P: (817) 748-8070 E: dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us Planning Review 1. Show any mechanical and/or roof top equipment. Mechanical equipment, including, mechanical/elevator equipment penthouse enclosures, ventilation equipment, antennas, chimneys, exhaust stacks and flues, fire sprinkler tanks, and other similar constructions may extend up to twenty (20) feet above the actual building height, and provided the same shall be subject to approval at approval of the applicable Site Plan unless: 1) they are setback from all exterior walls a distance at least equal to the vertical dimension that such items(s) extend(s) above the actual building height, or 2) the exterior wall and visible roof surfaces of such items that are set back less than their vertical dimension above the actual building are to be constructed as architecturally integral parts of the building facade(s) or as architectural embellishments as described in Section 37.4.(a).4. 2. Any easements encroaching the proposed building will need to be abandoned prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Public Works/Engineering Review This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. Attachment D ZA15-012 Page 1

* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?nid=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15. 2. Civil construction plans shall include plan sheets for pre-construction, post-construction and permanent erosion control measures and stabilization. * Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. * Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Sanitary sewer line needs to be in an easement. * Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30 RCP and under - 15 easement 42 54 RCP - 20 easement 60 66 RCP - 25 easement 72 102 RCP - 30 easement Over 102 RCP 3.5 times diameter * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Attachment D ZA15-012 Page 2

* Submit 22 x34 civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/publicworks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. * Denotes Informational Comments Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Fire Department Review 1. The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant. (Riser room location shown on plans, but not exact location of FDC)(FDC can be installed remotely if necessary to meet the required distance to the hydrant) 2. All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed near access to the riser room. Boxes can be ordered at www.knoxbox.com or contact the Fire Marshal s Office for assistance. 3. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5 X5 if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6 X6 if it is on the riser. (Ensure riser room is of adequate size) Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Attachment D ZA15-012 Page 3

* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 37, Downtown District. * Denotes Informational Comment Attachment D ZA15-012 Page 4

SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Lot 4, Block 2R1, Southlake Town Square Phase One SPO# Owner Name Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT 371 STATE ST 1.86 NR 2. Town Square Ventures Lp SP1 331 N CARROLL AVE 2.66 NR 3. United States Postal Service SP1 300 STATE ST 2.97 NR 4. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 1431 PLAZA PL 0.23 NR 5. Southlake, City Of DT 351 STATE ST 1.97 NR 6. Southlake, City Of DT 399 GRAND AVE W 0.34 NR 7. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT 1361 FEDERAL WAY 1.42 NR 8. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT 310 GRAND AVE W 0.40 NR 9. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 389 GRAND AVE W 0.01 NR 10. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 379 GRAND AVE W 0.01 NR 11. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 388 GRAND AVE E 0.01 NR 12. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 378 GRAND AVE E 0.01 NR 13. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 316 GRAND AVE W 0.25 NR 14. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 327 GRAND AVE E 0.43 NR 15. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT 301 STATE ST 0.48 NR 16. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT 250 GRAND AVE 0.56 NR 17. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 1401 FEDERAL WAY 2.44 NR 18. Southlake, City Of DT 1451 FEDERAL WAY 1.37 NR 19. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 251 GRAND AVE 0.60 NR 20. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT 1471 FEDERAL WAY 0.58 NR 21. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1240 MAIN ST 4.08 NR Attachment E ZA15-012 Page 1

22. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1400 CIVIC PL 0.75 NR 23. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1422 MAIN ST 0.67 NR 24. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1256 MAIN ST 0.67 NR 25. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1200 MAIN ST 0.58 NR 26. Southlake, City Of DT 1400 MAIN ST 0.69 NR 27. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1460 MAIN ST 0.48 NR 28. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1230 MAIN ST 0.28 NR 29. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1429 MAIN ST 0.33 NR 30. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 141 GRAND AVE 3.62 NR 31. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 181 GRAND AVE 0.39 NR 32. Southlake, City Of DT 1400 FOUNTAIN PL 0.81 NR 33. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 180 STATE ST 0.42 NR 34. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1235 MAIN ST 0.34 NR 35. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 115 GRAND AVE 0.38 NR 36. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 112 STATE ST 0.38 NR 37. Southlake, City Of DT 1400 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.94 NR 38. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1430 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.27 NR 39. Marvel, Scott SF20A 375 BINKLEY CT 0.47 NR 40. Schlitz, Carl Etux Adrianne SF20A 325 BINKLEY CT 0.57 NR 41. Strunck, Juergen F Etux Gisela DT 220 N CARROLL AVE 0.31 NR 42. Mendez Ltd AG 240 N CARROLL AVE 2.91 NR 43. Strunck, Juergen F Etux Gisela AG 200 N CARROLL AVE 3.27 NR 44. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 140 STATE ST 3.28 NR 45. Town Square Ventures Lp DT 1200 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.01 NR F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Forty-Five (45) Responses Received: None (0) as of the date of this report Attachment E ZA15-012 Page 2