York. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan. November 2006

Similar documents
Worthington Scranton. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

Penn State. Harrisburg. The Capital College. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

Penn State P Dubois Campus Exterior Architectural Plan October

Be P ave Beav enn State r er Campus Exterior Architectural Plan Spring 2010

Mont Alto. Penn State

Penn State Wi W lkes-barre ilkes-barre Campus Exterior Architectural Plan Spring 2010

Erie. The Behrend College. Penn State. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan

Learning in the Landscape

Landscaping And Site Details

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

EXISTING CONDITIONS 41. Existing Conditions

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan. Design Guidelines

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

Building and Site Design Standards

Community Design Plan

Assessment of the Extent and Quality of the Landscape Features of the Campus.

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

EXISTING VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

Town Center Design Guidelines

14.0 BUILT FORM DESIGN CRITERIA

RHBL 7325 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS. By: Whitney Musick

Ward Park. Park Land Established: Developed Acres: 9 acres Undeveloped Acres: 4 acres

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

Corridor Identity. Section 9. Introduction. Corridor Guiding Principles

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Indiana University Campus Division. A brief description of the Division that makes Indiana University a beautiful place to be

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements

AESTHETIC APPEARANCE. Design Guidelines for Grade-Separated Pedestrian, Cyclist and Equestrian Structures

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY GROUNDS MANAGEMENT PLAN FY 2013

Campus Outdoor Lighting Plan

HOMEOWNER S ENHANCEMENT GUIDE. Chapter 2: The Ranch

Reynoldsburg Major Commercial Corridors Streetscape and Development Design Guidelines/Standards. Development Design Guidelines/Standards

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

Project purpose. advise. The purpose of the Beaumaris Lake Open Space Rehabilitation project is to: + Develop a Functional Program Concept

TREE GUARDS AND EDGING

PART TWO: PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN GUIDELINES

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:

VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)

2.5 Walkways, Driveways, and Offstreet Parking: Guidelines

Landscape Design Guidelines

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

Blue Springs Park. Park Land Established: Developed Acres: 12 acres Undeveloped Acres: 2 acres

Motor City Re-Store Design Guidelines

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE. A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review

PUBLIC FRONTAGE REGULATIONS MAP

The Project. In 2013, construction was completed between 100 Street and 102 Street.

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

City of Langley, WA, Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Seawall Park Design

City of Aurora Planning Department DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING STATION. August 3, 1998

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

SITE FURNISHINGS STANDARDS MANUAL

Design Guidelines: Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program

Moreno Valley College: Conceptual Master Planning - Site Analysis Lasselle Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92551

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF New Street Burlington, ON

VILLAGE OF HUNTLEY COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Benches Trash & Recycling Containers Railings and Bullrail Edges Paving Planting Pier Apron Lighting Interpretive Signage

Campus Sign Plan. Adopted by the Campus Planning Committee Adopted: June 26, 2006 Revised: April 14, 2016

Bloomington Housing Authority Outdoor/Yard/Patio Policy

COLERAIN TOWNSHIP ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 18, :00 p.m.

Interior signs are an extension of the exterior sign system and their content and design should take this into consideration.

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project

IV.63 Heritage Landscapes LLC, Preservation Landscape Architect & Planners

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

Design Guidelines and Standards for Sight Triangles. Sight Triangle MANUAL

FACADE DESIGN GUIDELINES

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Seattle Children s Major Institution Master Plan. Approved May 7, 2010

The West College Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Plan

Hidden Pointe Landscape Master Plan. June, archi terra

SECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2

Main Street Reconstruction From Ninth Line to Stouffer Street. Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Public Information Centre


Wilbur Young Park. Park Land Established: Developed Acres: 15 acres Undeveloped Acres: 25 acres

Town of Cedarburg Design Guidelines & Standards Commercial / Multi Family / Senior Care /Institutional/ Government Facilities Adopted August 6, 2014

Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

MIAMI 21 PUBLIC HEARING-FIRST READING 2009

GREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle

Ohlone College Measure G Project Scope Revisions

ARTICLE 27 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICTS

Norwood Public Library Rendering

PART I-D BUFFERS AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS

U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h C a r o l i n a A i k e n. Land Plan Study

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

School Property REVIEWING YOUR BUILDINGS & GROUNDS

Transcription:

November 2006

Contents Introduction and Purpose Existing Conditions Inventory s

Introduction and purpose Penn State s Mission: Penn State is a multi-campus public land-grant university that improves the lives of the people of Pennsylvania, the nation, and the world through integrated, high-quality programs in teaching, research, and service. To assist in achieving this mission, a Campus Exterior Architecture Plan, know as a CEAP, is developed to suggest ways to improve the aesthetic qualities of campus with low-cost and easyto-implement concepts that can have meaningful impacts. The CEAP is a planning tool that is an outgrowth of the campus master planning process. The CEAP includes graphic and narrative descriptions of existing conditions on campus and approximately 15-20 improvement concepts. Positive features may also be identifi ed as elements to emulate. The improvement concepts are ranked or prioritized according to their visual impact and estimated cost. The concepts are not fi nal designs. Further study and design are required prior to implementation.

Existing Conditions Inventory Background: Penn State presently occupies 55 acres of property within Spring Garden Township and the City of. The campus is bordered on three sides by residential neighborhoods and industrial land use to the north. A focused site analysis was performed to assessment the campus exterior and provide the foundation for the recommendations and concepts contained in this CEAP document. General Observations: Academic buildings have been located on the perimeter of campus preserving a large campus core characterized by expanses of open turf. The facilities are well maintained and demonstrate a cared for image to students, faculty and staff as well as the general public. Because on-campus housing does not exist at Penn State, commuting students must park in one of the large lots. Some of the existing oncampus parking facilities are inadequately screened from view. For the most part pedestrian circulation is well defi ned and adequately maintained. Due to the topography of the site there are isolated ADA challenges that must be addressed. Improved outdoor gathering spaces are limited. The fi gures that follow identify and elaborate on specifi c features of the campus exterior.

Campus Map NORTH

Architecture Existing Conditions Inventory The predominant building material is brick and the architectural style is modern. Exterior improvements such as walls, site furnishings, lighting and planting designs should be stylistically compatible with existing campus aesthetic. Major architectural modifi cations, additions, and new construction are beyond the scope of this CEAP. Pullo Family Performing Arts Center & Lee R. Glatfelter Library

Site Furnishings Existing Conditions Inventory A variety of types and styles of benches, tables, trash receptacles and planters exist across the campus. The opportunity exists to establish a uniform aesthetic character, campus wide, through the use of stylistically complimentary and suitably scaled furnishings. In addition to aesthetic appropriateness, the longevity and maintenance of site furnishings should be considered when specifying.

Lighting Existing Conditions Inventory Exterior lighting across the campus is relatively uniform. Fixtures and poles appear to be in good repair and are appropriately scaled. Walkway lights are not cut-off fi xtures. Lamping is high pressure sodium.

Signage Existing Conditions Inventory Campus identifi cation and wayfi nding signage is inconsistent stylistically with respect to copy, color, size and detailing. Deviations from PSU signage standards exist. Campus maps to direct pedestrians to various buildings are absent.

Landscape Existing Conditions Inventory The landscape aesthetic of the campus is characterized by large expanses of turf. Ornamental plantings where present, are conservative and appropriate. Opportunities to screen objectionable views such as parking and mechanical equipment are noted. Gathering spaces are sparsely furnished. The softening benefi t of landscape plantings in strategic locations is absent.

Pedestrian Circulation Existing Conditions Inventory ADA compliant pedestrian circulation is and will always be a challenge on this campus due to the topographic condition. Suitable walkway connections are absent in some locations. Expansive unused asphalt surfaces exist. Handrail design is inconsistent across campus.

Unique Features Existing Conditions Inventory Distant city views from a variety of vantage points across campus are a distinguishing characteristic of the Campus.

s The following fi gures describe and illustrate possible solutions to specifi c aesthetic and functional shortcomings on campus, most of which are addressable through the CEAP program. In addition to the recommendations that follow, there are routine maintenance tasks that will enhance the aesthetic appeal of campus without added capital cost. Suggestions include: Mulch landscape beds annually Eradicate weeds Fertilize lawn areas Limit use of annual and perennial fl owers to areas that can be maintained An implementation priority matrix follows that lists improvement projects and recommends the order in which the projects could be executed. The implementation ranking is intended as a guideline for realizing the most signifi cant impacts early in the plan implementation. Location specifi c projects are keyed to the map with numbers corresponding to the listing on the matrix at the end of this report.

1a Parge & Paint Parged fi nished panels on Main Building are in need or repair or replacement. Inspect, repair, replace and repaint. Before After After

1b Air Conditioners Air conditioning units protruding from windows are unsightly. The marketplace offers new, effi cient window units that are housed primarily on the interior of the room with a more integrated exhaust grill. Installation of this type of unit will improve the aesthetics of the building. Before After

1c Door Painting Color of painted exterior doors should be consistent with other trim elements on the building. After Before After Before

1d Pressure Wash Inspect exterior masonry surfaces for dirt, mildew and other discolorations. Power wash to remove. The foundation perimeter of the Multi-Purpose Building (shown) as well as cast concrete window sills on the Main Building have been noted in particular.

2a Site Furnishings Site furnishings designed in a style family provide a unifying aesthetic theme. The examples shown here will compliment the contemporary architectural style present on the campus. Powder coated metal is attractive, comfortable and durable. Planters should be appropriately sized for the space they occupy and be constructed of durable, quality material. The examples shown here are cast stone in a simple yet appealing style.

2b Handrails Visual continuity across the campus can be strengthened by the installation of one standard handrail design. Color/fi nish is also important to achieving this objective. ADA guidelines stipulate criteria for acceptable railing designs. ADA Accessibility Guidelines can be found on the internet at http://www.access-board.gov/ada-aba/ comparison/index.htm

2c Emergency Phones Install call box emergency phones with state of the art pole style.

2d Stair Replacement The existing stairs and railings between the faculty/staff and visitor parking lots to the south of Main Building are in disrepair and require replacement. Parking stall striping should be reapplied and pedestrian islands created. Stripe island VAN VAN Remove and replace existing stair and railings 12 spaces @ 9 wide x 18 deep 11 spaces @ 9 wide x 18 deep Stripe island

Admin. Offices Conference Center Visitor Parking Pullo Center Glatfelter Library 3 Signage Comprehensive standardized signage across campus conveys a unifi ed image. These examples illustrate the standard adopted at University Park. The manual specifying the standards can be found at www. opp.psu.edu/stnd/signage/index.html PULLO FAMILY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER Bookstore Ruhl Center Multi-Purpose Bldg Main Building Pullo Center Glatfelter Library Wall-mounted Building Identifi er Sign Aluminum cutout letters mounted to non-illuminated painted aluminum backer pan. 6 high 1 1/2 deep satin fi nish letters Font style: Gill Sans Light MAIN CLASSROOM BUILDING MAIN CLASSROOM BUILDING Administrative Offices Conference Center Gallery La Grone Cultural Arts Center

4 Lighting Plan for phased replacement of any antiquated, ineffi cient pedestrian walkway lighting. Propose the use of metal halide lamps in cut-off luminaires mounted to poles. It has been noted that at the time of this assessment the campus has recently installed a signifi cant quantity of the non-cutoff fi xture shown at the far left. An inquiry with the fi xture manufacturer indicates that retrofi tting the design to a cutoff standard is not presently possible. Prior to replacement of exisitng lights with a different style it is recommended that an attempt be made to modify the existing fi xture to achieve cutoff compliance. Avoid the use of bollards due to vulnerability to snow removal operations and vandalism.

5a Main Building Courtyard Improvements The predominant landscape element in the Main Building courtyard is turf. By enhancing the landscape plantings and updating site furnishings this space will attract users and be more pleasing visually from surrounding interior spaces. Lawn New benches New tables New walkway Lawn New site lights

5b Landscape Improvement View of maintenance building along Springdale Street The streetscape along Albemarle Street is often the fi rst impression perspective students and visitors have of the campus. Landscape upgrades to this area are needed to enhance the aesthetics of this important campus open space. Expand landscape planting around entrance sign Remove gravel, replace topsoil and re-seed temporary parking area. Install a shrub buffer screen along the parking lot perimeter. Supplement the landscape planting around the entrance sign. Supplementing the planting along Springdale Avenue will also aid in screening the view of the newly constructed maintenance building. Add landscape screening along parking lot View looking west along Springdale Avenue Add landscape screening along parking lot View looking north along Albemarle Street

5c Landscape Improvement Opportunities exist across the campus, to screen utilitarian functions from view. Supplemental landscape plantings will not only obscure views but will add interest and beauty to the campus. 1 -Screen service area 2 -Screen mechanical equipment 1 2 3 3 -Screen utility meters

Landscape Improvement 5d West Elevation Comprehensive standardized signage across campus conveys a unifi ed image. These examples illustrate the standard adopted at University Park. The manual specifying the standards can be found at www. opp.psu.edu/stnd/signage/index.html South Elevation Arborvitae - hedge Red Oak - Island tree Evergreen screen along building and fence NORTH Foundation planting at building entrance

5e Landscape Improvement The service area/loading dock area of the Pullo Center and Glatfelter Library Building is prominently visible upon entering the campus along the new entry drive. Landscape plantings needed to soften and diminish the scale of the building are absent or underplanted. Graded slopes currently planted with high maintenance turf should be replaced with trees, shrubs and groundcovers. The lower level pedestrian entrance from the parking lot is ill-defi ned and unremarkable. 1 - Pullo Center / Library from entrance drive 2 - Slope at service area / loading dock 2 1 4 3 - Parking lot south of Pullo Center 4 - Library approach from parking lot 3

Existing parking lot Reduce pavement width Maintain fire access 5f Library Entry The pedestrian entry experience from the Librarary/Auditorium parking lot is inadequate with repect to walkways and aesthetic quality. Propose the development of a drop-off/turn around and supplemental sidewalks. The new patio area should be furnished with bench seating and waste receptacles. The soapbox derby track is excessively wide. Propose the narrowing of the asphalt road while maintaining the required fi re access to the building. Concrete walkway Drop-off circle Concrete walkway to parking Existing parking lot 2 Bench seating 3 1 Patio/entry 1 - Existing View From Library Entrance Pullo Center & Glatfelter Library 3 - Existing View From Pullo Center Lobby 2 - Existing View of Library Entrance

Project Key Map Penn State Project Prioritization Matrix January 2006 1c 1d 2a 2b 2c 3 4 5c Campus wide Proposed exterior improvement projects have been assessed with respect to the following criteria and assigned an implementation priority value. Criteria include: Visual Impact - degree to which the project improves the visual quality of the campus Cost - level of capital investment required to implement the project (assumes no volunteer or donor contribution) The projects with the highest numeric score should be given the highest priority for implementation VISUAL IMPACT COST 1 - Little or no impact 1 - Greater than $25,000 2 - Minor Impact 2 - $15,001 to $25,000 3 - Moderate Impact 3 - $5,001 to $15,000 4 - Major Impact NORTH # PROJECT IMPACT COST SCORE 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1a Parge and Paint X 1b Window air conditioners X 1c Door Paint X 1d Pressure wash (campus wide) X 5e 5f 2a Site Furnishings (campus wide) X 2b Handrails (campus wide) X 2c Emergency (Codeblue) Phones X 2d Stair replacement X 3 Signage (campus wide) X 4 Lighting (campus wide) X 1a 5a 1b 2d 5d 5a Courtyard improvements X 5b Lawn restoration (Albemarle Street) X 5c Service/utility screening (various locations) X 5d Screen Maintenance Compound X 5e Pullo Center/Glatfelter Library X 5f Library Entrance X 5b Note: Cost ranges identified in this matrix are for planning purposes only. Actual costs will be dependent upon fully developed plans for the respective project. Some of the projects listed above can be broken down into smaller pieces and implemented in phases.