Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

Similar documents
Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Welcome. to the 95th Street Terminal Improvement Project Public Hearing

Southeast Extension to RidgeGate Parkway Scoping Booklet

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

METRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting. August 23, 2018

EXPANDING THE NETWORK ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Route 110 Alternatives Analysis

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

Por favor, levanten la mano si necesita traduccion en espanol Please raise your hand if you need Spanish translation

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

Bus Rapid Transit Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Summary

Eglinton West LRT Update

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

SLIDE TITLE. TRANSIT AGENCIES AND COMMUNITY PLANNING Case Study in Supporting TOD with the Chicago Transit Authority TRANSPORT CHICAGO 2017

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March Table of Contents

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

Michigan City Alternative Analysis Realignment Study. Progress Status Update Report Presentation to City Council February 1, 2012

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Project Overview. Get Involved. Public Information Meeting. Contact Information

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

Chapter 1: Introduction

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

FATAL FLAW ANALYSIS. March 2014 FINAL. DRAFT Febru

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

Key Themes and Responses May 2016

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT AREA

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

Route 5 Corridor Land Use and Transportation Plan

People who are members of historically disenfranchised racial, ethnic, cultural, and other identity groups are encouraged to apply.

New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

POTOMAC YARD METRORAIL STATION

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

117 E. Louisa St. #1 Seattle, WA January 29, 2016

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Project Overview. Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Public Information Meeting. Contact Information

Public Hearing April 12, Information as of April 12, 2018

Environmental Assessment

Relief Line Project Assessment

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Transportation. Strategies for Action

COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE. March 28, 2012

Peoria Avenue BRT Land Use Framework

Link Union Station (Link US) Project Open House September 26, 2018

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Central Corridor Light Rail Transit. Environmental Assessment Three Infill Stations. Western, Victoria, and Hamline

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Relief Line Project Assessment

BALLARD TO DOWNTOWN SEATTLE

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

What s Up Next In The Seattle Squeeze. PSRC Transportation Policy Board April 11

Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

The proposals presented in September drew a large number of comments and feedback and have been grouped together as follows:

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Point A Point B Point C Point D. City of Hapeville Public Meeting July 25, 2017

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

2017 General Obligation Bond

Route 1 Corridor Study

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

Bus Rapid Transit Backgrounder. December 2016

Transcription:

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development Overview The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), in partnership with the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is proposing to implement an approximately 16-mile long Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service along Ashland Avenue to improve transit speed and reliability and enhance the pedestrian environment. The project corridor extends north-south along Ashland Avenue from Irving Park Road to 95 th Street, to improve transit speed and reliability and enhance the pedestrian environment An Environmental Assessment (EA), which is a document that provides a detailed assessment of social, economic, and environmental impacts of the project, has recently been completed for the full 16-mile corridor in accordance with federal requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). This handout provides a summary of the EA, including the project purpose and need, alternatives considered, and results. It also provides information on how to obtain a copy of the EA and provide oral or written comments on the EA and the project. Public Open House Goals This open house serves as a formal public hearing for this Environmental Assessment (EA), and is being conducted in accordance with federal requirements of 23 CFR 771.119. The goals of this open house are to: 1) Present the analysis and findings of the EA 2) Present additional information about: What is Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)? The Ashland Avenue BRT Project, including block-by-block concept designs Where we are in the overall planning process 3) Seek formal comments on the EA and the project Image: Map depicting the proposed Ashland BRT corridor, listing all proposed BRT stops from north to south, on Ashland Avenue: Irving Park, Addison, Roscoe, Belmont, Diversey, Fullerton, Cortland, North, Division, Chicago, Grand, Lake, Madison, Jackson, Harrison, Polk, Roosevelt, 18th, Blue Island, 31st, 35th, Pershing, 43rd, 47th, 51st, Garfield, 59th, 63rd, 69th, 74th, 79th, 83rd, 87th, 91st, 95th. The image also highlights the "Phase 1" corridor, which includes all stops between the Cortland Street stop and the 31st Street stop. This project is planned as part of a citywide BRT initiative consistent with the goals and objectives outlined in the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 2040 regional long range transportation plan (GO TO 2040). The project purpose and need were developed through the Alternative Analysis process in coordination with public and agency outreach efforts. Project Need CTA and CDOT are proposing to implement the Ashland Avenue BRT Project to address the following issues: Regional growth patterns outside of Chicago s Loop

Congestion and a lack of competitive travel options Large number of transit dependent customers Lack of non-downtown, north-south, fast transit alternatives Slow bus speeds, frequent stops, and unreliable bus travel times Street design issues no longer meet corridor needs or land use policy objectives Project Purpose The purpose of the Ashland Avenue BRT Project is to expand connectivity to the region s existing transit system by providing a new and upgraded high quality, high capacity and cost effective premium transit service a service which provides faster, more reliable, and comfortable passenger experience. The proposed project would address the transportation needs of expansive population and employment growth outside of the Central Business District or Loop and support local and regional land use, transportation and economic development initiatives. Specifically, the project will improve accessibility, mobility, transit travel times and reliability, and passenger facilities in this heavily transit reliant corridor. Alternative Analysis After technical analysis and input at six public open houses in 2012, the center running configuration was chosen as the Preferred Alternative to move through subsequent environmental evaluation and conceptual design. Further details on the Alternatives Analysis process and results are discussed in CTA s How We Got Here: Western and Ashland Corridors Bus Rapid Transit Project Alternatives Analysis Summary, available on CTA s project website (www.transitchicago.com/ashlandbrt). Project Features and Benefits BRT will offer riders faster, more reliable service and new, amenity-filled stations with enhanced, landscaped medians between stations. Local bus service will remain in addition to the BRT service. This project will provide enhanced regional connectivity to existing transit bus and rail services that intersect with the corridor, and serve 232,000 residents and 133,000 jobs along the corridor. Ashland currently has the highest ridership in the system, with more than 31,000 boardings each weekday. How it Works Center running bus-only lanes (one in each direction), to keep buses moving fast and onschedule, out of general traffic Limited stops: approximately every half mile and at CTA L stations Transit Signal Priority intersections and longer green lights to keep traffic moving Potential for paying fares at the station before boarding to make boarding faster Wide doors on left side of new, high-capacity vehicles to make boarding easier Improved lighting, ADA ramps and real-time bus arrival information at stations Maintains most existing medians and adds more than 75 blocks of new landscaped medians Approximately 90% of parking and loading zones retained on both sides of the street In order to accommodate BRT, the following adjustments would occur:

o o Two general travel lanes (one in each direction) dedicated as center running bus-only lanes Most left turns removed to keep buses and general through-traffic moving Image: Conceptual Rendering of an Ashland BRT Station Environmental Assessment Summary An Environmental Assessment (EA) was recently completed to evaluate and assess potential impacts to the natural, manmade and community environments that may result from implementation of the 16- mile Ashland Avenue BRT Project. To evaluate impacts, the proposed configuration ( Build Alternative ) was compared to the existing configuration ( No-Build Alternative ). The No-Build Alternative assumed no major transit system improvements or investments within the corridor. Existing Configuration (No-Build Alternative) Before image: Photograph of typical No-Build Alternative conditions along Ashland Avenue. Two auto travel lanes in each direction Parking on both sides Left turns mid-block and at intersections 15 sidewalks Painted and landscaped medians Proposed Configuration (Build Alternative) After image: Photo-simulation of proposed typical Build Alternative (Preferred Alternative) conditions along Ashland Avenue at a station. One center running bus-only lane in each direction One auto travel lane in each direction Approximately 90% of parking and loading zones maintained on both sides of street Left turns removed, except at interstates Maintains existing 15 sidewalks and wider sidewalks (17 to 28 ) provided at station intersections Most landscaped median widths maintained throughout corridor Over 75 blocks of new landscaped medians provided Environmental Evaluation The EA evaluated potential impacts related to various features that may result from a project. These features include: Natural Features Air quality, water, biological, geology and soils, indirect and cumulative Community Features Land use and economic development, neighborhood and community, environmental justice, historic and archaeological, park land and recreational, visual quality, noise and vibration, displacement/relocations

Vehicular Traffic and Parking Features Vehicular traffic volumes and speeds, vehicular diversion routes, parking Transit, Bicycle and Pedestrian Features Transit travel times and reliability, transit ridership and demand, station access, pedestrian space, connectivity to bike-share Construction and Operational Features Energy, safety and security, temporary construction, hazardous materials Evaluation Results Based on the results of the EA evaluation, the Ashland Avenue BRT Project is expected to have positive impacts on air quality, land use, economic development, neighborhoods and communities, transit service, and the bicycle and pedestrian environment. Potential negative impacts of the project include noise and vibration, vehicular traffic, parking, energy, and temporary construction impacts. Proposed mitigation measures identified in the EA would render these impacts not adverse. Additional detailed analyses can be found in the full Environmental Assessment. Copies of the full Environmental Assessment are available at this meeting and online at www.transitchicago.com/ashlandbrt. The Ashland Avenue BRT design is still being developed. CTA and CDOT are considering options and modifications, including the addition of some left-turns to the design, and we want your feedback on the current proposal. How Can I View a Copy of the Environmental Assessment? Copies of the Environmental Assessment are available at CTA s website (www.transitchicago.com/ashlandbrt), and at the following locations during the 30-day comment period: CTA Headquarters 567 W. Lake Street, Chicago Hours: Weekdays 8:00 A.M. 4:30 P.M. Harold Washington Library Center 400 S. State Street, Chicago Hours: Weekdays, Sat.: 9:00 A.M. 9:00 P.M., Sun: 1:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. Chicago Public Library Branch Locations: Lincoln Belmont 1659 W. Melrose Street, Chicago West Town 1625 W. Chicago Avenue, Chicago Lozano (Pilsen) 1805 S. Loomis Street, Chicago West Englewood 1745 W. 63rd Street, Chicago Branch Hours: Mon., Wed.: 10:00 A.M. 6:00 P.M., Tues., Thurs.: 12:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M., Fri., Sat.: 9:00 A.M. 5:00 P.M. Project Schedule Alternatives Analysis: 2012

Environmental Analysis and Conceptual Engineering: Spring 2013 to Fall 2013 (We are Here) Detailed Design: Date to be determined, contingent upon available funding All Phases include public engagement Next Steps Comments on the Environmental Assessment (EA) are being taken over a 30-day period that began with publication of the EA. Comments will inform the next phase of design. Comments and responses will become part of the final EA, which will be available on CTA s website. Detailed design will begin on the first 5.4-mile segment (Phase 1). Concept designs will be refined based on additional technical analysis and community input. CTA and CDOT will hold additional public meetings as part of the next phase of design. How to Comment/Stay Involved Comments may be submitted during this open house by either speaking with the court reporter or completing a comment form. In addition, written comments may be submitted via email to AshlandBRT@transitchicago.com or by mail to: Chicago Transit Authority Strategic Planning & Policy, 10th Floor Attn: Joe Iacobucci 567 W. Lake Street Chicago, IL 60661 To be added to the project contact email or mailing list for future updates, contact CTA by email address at right or U.S. mail at the address above. Project Email AshlandBRT@transitchicago.com Phone 1-888-YOUR-CTA (1-888-968-7282) En Español Para información en español, llame al (312) 681-2704 Project Web Site www.transitchicago.com/ashlandbrt/ For more information about other BRT projects and events in Chicago: www.brtchicago.com