Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 )

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 ASEAN-Turkey ASLI (Annual Serial Landmark International) Conferences on Quality of Life 2016 AMER International Conference on Quality of Life, AicQoL2016Medan 25 27 February 2016, Medan, Indonesia A Framework for Exploring Livable Community in Residential Environment. Case Study: Public Housing in Medan, Indonesia Dwira Nirfalini Aulia * Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sumatera Utara, Jl.Perpustakaan Gedung J07Medan 20155, Indonesia Abstract Livability is the sum of the factors that add up to a community s quality of life. The factors are including the built and natural environments, economic prosperity, social stability and equity, educational opportunity, and cultural, entertainment and recreation opportunities. Some studies show an interest in 'place shaping' as a way to create a livable community. The aim of the research is to identify the place shaping in public housing in Medan by using grounded theory. The research area is Perumnas Helvetia, Perumnas Simalingkar and Perumnas Martubung. Community residents of Perumnas represent the character of the local community in Indonesia. 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Peer-review 2016 The Authors. under responsibility Published by Elsevier of AMER Ltd. (Association This is an open of Malaysian access article Environment-Behaviour under the CC BY-NC-ND Researchers) license and ce-bs (Centre (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). for Environment-Behaviour Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. Peer-review under responsibility of the Association of Malaysian Environment-Behavior Researchers, AMER (ABRA malaysia) Keywords: Livable community; place shaping; public housing 1. Introduction Livability is the sum of the factors that add up to a community s quality of life. The factors are including the built and natural environments, economic prosperity, social stability and equity, educational opportunity, and cultural, * Corresponding author. Tel.: +60123952786; fax: +60355435698. E-mail address: dwira_aulia@yahoo.com 1877-0428 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Association of Malaysian Environment-Behavior Researchers, AMER (ABRA malaysia) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.250

Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 337 entertainment and recreation opportunities. Planning a quality of residential area where occupants feel comfortable in the present and the future is the goal of the designers. Based on Dempsey (2009), designing livable community is needed: (1). Some criteria based on occupant satisfaction housing, (2). The design is in neighborhood scale and (3) indicators of design criteria. The effort to create a livable community has been making all over the world. Stevens (2009) compare the effort of planning in US and UK. In the US, livability embraces a range of long-term efforts by increase environmental sustainability, by increasing densities and land use mix and improving transport. Whereas in the UK, target livable community focuses on the management and redevelopment of spaces in existing neighbourhood rather than the planning in the new one. The livability of a residential environment as one measure of community quality of life (Epley & Manon, 2008). Livability operates at the level of the everyday physical environment and focuses on placemaking. Forming a place involve not only an architect but also a planner and an urban designer. The place is the environmental settings to which people are emotionally and culturally attached. Community attachment in the place will be the basis for the establishment of livable community. This study explores a framework for planning livable community in the public housing area. The government appointed Perumahan Nasional (Perumnas) to organize productive activities in the development of public housing construction and infrastructure. Lower-middle-income groups are living in public housing that to acquire the necessary economic status to move on in life (Okunola & Amole, 2013), so the social dynamics of the public housing is quite high. Exploring place shaping in public housing with highly social dynamics will help the formation of livable community there. The prediction of the study is a livable community will be formed when the needs of residents are accommodated and involved in the management of the settlement. The research area is public housing in Medan namely Perumnas Helvetia, Perumnas Simalingkar and Perumnas Martubung. The structure of the paper consists of background study, literature review, framework planning and implementation in a residential environment, discussion and conclusion. 2. Literature review 2.1. Quality of life There is an overlap in a relationship between normative, objective and subjective quality of life. The normative QOL refers to the perfect condition; objective QOL refers to the standard quality of the world such as PCGDP (PerCapita Gross Domestic Product), and subjective QOL refers to residential satisfaction. Shirotsuki et all (2010) doing the research about the gap between planning environmental psychology used scale items of a sense of place such as place attachments, place identity and place dependence. The research conclusion has shown, most people are more likely to have a sense of place even if time has the pass. It indicates that although there are differences in the assessment, the resident has psychologically bonded with their seats; it will remain outside of planning theory. Research on the relationship between the physical environment and the quality of neighborhood life have published in the scientific journal of various disciplines (Bajunid et al., 2011). This evidence suggests that a relationship between the physical environment and neighborhood quality of life is important because many researchers from different disciplines and different viewpoints have thought about it. 2.2. Livable community Planning livable community depends on the scale of planning. Regional scale is quite different from similar issues at the neighbourhood scale. An effective way to manage the aspects is to prepare plans at each relevant scale. Research conducted by (Aulia,2014) in regional scale discovered that the component of a livable community is (1). Land usage, where the community has diverse land use to meet their needs. (2). Social and Cultural Opportunities (3). Economic Resources, the availability of resources can be a catalyst for raising the level of cultural, recreational and artistic opportunities (4). Access and Mobility, it means efficient land use and transportation linkages that give residents access and mobility. (5). Safety and aesthetics, it means safe community, safe neighborhoods and safe streets. (6). Environmental considerations such as good water quality, air quality and noise. (7). Cumulative aspect

338 Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 can affect a variety of human and ecological resources. In Figure 1 below shows how place shaping will form a livable community that would affect the quality of life in the neighborhood. 2.3. Place shaping Fig. 1. Livable community linkage Some studies show an interest in 'place shaping' as a way to create a livable community. Place shaping demands a robust integration of economic, social, cultural and environmental goals. Place shaping is about serving the needs of diverse communities (Carmona, 2014). According to (Pugalis, 2010) there are some criteria to create place shaping in a residential environment such as connecting people, develop and manage appropriateness, develop economic and financial flows, improve the opportunities and life changes. Place shaping affects many aspects that are why it is not a simple task. Grant & Dollery (2010) conducted research of place shaping in developing countries from the local government point of view. The study of place shaping as a mode of municipal reform for the role of local authorities in economic. The sub-national government in Indonesia under reformation in light of the site shaping style of local governments. Shaping Place has a different point of view if been seen from a variety of disciplines. A variety of viewpoints can be seen in Table 1 below. Table 1. Different point of view about place shaping Architect (Matthew, 2014) Environmentalist (Haarhoff, 2014) Urban Planner (Coiacetto, 2013) Planner & Environmental Management (Syms, 2014) Place Shaping Viewed of Place Shaping from theory approach because when implemented in the real condition require user perception Viewed of Place Shaping from firstly physical aspect and then the actors which involved in the process of shaping place. Viewed of Place Shaping as the practice of informing theoretical paradigm that planning needs. Viewed of Place Shaping as an attempt to attract people, and encouraging them to linger and return. The process of shaping place The process of Place Shaping should be done on a larger scale such as to establish sustainable development The process of place shaping is heavily dependent on understanding the process involve and the roles of various public and private actors in real estate development The process of place shaping, needs the planners have to influence and shape the actions of actors within the institution that do build cities in market-based economies. The process of place shaping needs for collective action in place making. Source: Author (2015) By exploring place shaping from different of disciplines, it is seen that place shaping process requires the involvement of various parties. Based on that statement, it is necessary to draw up a framework to plan place shaping for the residential environment that can be implemented in another public housing in Indonesia. 3. Research framework According to Nordwall & Olofsson (2013), spatial components of the residential environment are the properties, the characteristics of surroundings and usage flexibility within the building. Characteristics of surrounding imply on how the area opportunities have been treated and utilized. Flexibility within the building means the versatility of the

Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 339 rooms of the housing. Characteristics of surrounding consists of four case that are: identity, neighbourliness, safety and recreational. Meanwhile, shape and layout of the building, as well as the accessibility of housing, will determine the flexibility of the building. Identity is something that is intended to strengthen the tenant sense of home. Neighbourliness can be seen from most of the tenants who knows each other because they have the same social background. Safety from criminal incidence and natural disasters. Recreationally implies on the availability of public places and their managements. Neighborhood s characteristic was used as the focus of components in the process of shaping place. Specifically (Farahani & Lozanovska, 2014) conducted a study of the formation of the sense of public community spaces in the residential environment. They are three groups of criteria: design strategies, planning strategies and public places and activity generators. Meanwhile, there is denial about the place shaping that theory of place shaping is a theory of urban evolution, not a theory of urban design (Lang, 2013). Because the major phases of this ongoing process of an activity within the broader processes of urban change. It is a space in use that is managed by many stakeholders, particularly property developers with their architects and public authorities. When the process of Place Shaping, the formation of community attachment is used as the criterion of the formation. Sapawi & Said (2013) conduct research to construct indices of physical attributes by detecting different item functioning based on respondent s demographic factors and their perceived environment in the urban neighbourhood area. The indicator for walkable urban neighbourhood model is five dimension level of need that is feasibility, accessibility, safety, comfort and pleasurability. With the background of an architect, the researcher has identified physical and non-physical attributes have to test the place concept in the residential environment. Fig.2. Framework of place shaping By forming the sense of place, so that the occupant will feel attached to the neighborhood. This is the basic form of livable community. 4. Methodology The method used in this research is the ground theory of Place Shaping by the qualitative methods developed in the social sciences and humanities, where defining a description of quality values and characteristics are important. Grounded Theory is about creation, formulation of a theory and this method lets the theory develop from the collected data. (Nordwall & Olofsson, 2013) The term grounded is used because the theory is drawn from the data and not from speculation ideas. Theory in generated from a combination of literature, observations, common sense and experience. The method of collecting primary data was field observation, interview and image recording at Perumnas Helvetia, Perumnas Simalingkar and Perumnas Martubung. Data analysis was conducted in conjunction

340 Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 with data collection to identify an area of interest early on and to ensure that the method used was well suited. The data analysis using comparative method. The process of comparative analysis is expected to reveal similarities and differences in the data. Procedure for framework building involves defining the variables, specifying the domain, building internally consistent relationships and making the prediction. (Knight and Ruddock, 2008). The framework of Place Shaping can be seen at Picture 2. The used of a case study in framework building is considered to be appropriate in new areas or to provide different perspectives. The advantages of the use of case studies in framework building are the close link with reality where the framework is likely to be novel, testable and be empirically valid. There was some limitation in ground theory method such as (1). The researchers have developed the theory too early on in the course of the research work, (2) The researchers make assumptions based on their own personal beliefs. 5. Finding The government establishes Perumnas as an institution that builds public housing in Indonesia. Perumnas was present in Medan in 1975 developing housing as follows: West region of Medan in Helvetia area, since 1975 to 1983 has built 4827 units on the land of 97 Ha. East of Medan in Denai area, since 1979 to 1990 has built 10.228 units on 173 Ha land. South of Medan in Simalingkar area, since 1983 to 1991 has built 8.178 units on 151 Ha land. North of Medan in Martubung area, since 1995 to 2007 has built 3.729 units on 106,31 Ha land Table 2. Research finding Place Shaping Strategies Perumnas Helvetia Perumnas Simalingkar Perumnas Martubung Management Strategies Similarities: The housing is intended for low-income groups but has a regular income Differences: The occupants have the diverse occupation but majority work on the location about 0-5 km from the housing complex. Public Places and Activity Generator Similarities: All of the housing have the public facility and open space. Differences: Perumnas Martubung has the most complete of public facilities because the housing complex also be function as the generator activity in North Medan City Region. Planning Strategies Similarities: Public transportation links into the housing complex The market of this housing complex was initially for civil servants, military and law enforcement personnel, stateowned business employee, and retired employee. The legality of home ownership initially was 20 years building rights after acquittal, and then in 1998 with policy changing then the legality of home ownership becomes proprietary rights. Perumnas Helvetia has almost complete facilities except for culture and recreation facilities. None of them are well maintained almost as if it was neglected. Housing facilities are utilized together within housing occupants. Public transportation links into the housing complex. Pedestrian and cycling path merges with the road network in the housing complex. The bus stop is well The market of this housing complex was initially for the government employee, the private sector, teachers and entrepreneurs. To accommodate the occupant activities carried out by Youth Organization, Religion Society Public open space facilities are at several locations in neighbourhood scale. There are educational facilities such as kindergarten, elementary, junior and senior high school Public transportation links into the housing complex. Pedestrian and cycling path merges with the road network in the housing complex. The market of this housing complex was for the industrial workers who are work in Medan Industrial Estate. With the level of housing need is high enough, in 2004 the Perumnas had planned to build Perumnas Martubung 2. Educational facilities such as kindergarten, elementary, junior and senior high school Shopping facilities such as shophouses, store and traditional market. Religion facilities such as mosque, church Sports facilities such as football field and play-ground. Public transportation links into the housing complex. Pedestrian and cycling path merges with the road network in the housing complex.

Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 341 Pedestrian and cycling path merges with the housing road network planned Design Strategies Similarities: The type of housing units is built in equal because it was Perumnas standart. Perumnas Helvetia Medan site is divided into cluster system that then also divided again using a grid system. Clusters are marked with the housing of the same type. House types such as D24, D36, D45, M70 and Shophouses Perumnas Simalingkar Medan site is divided into cluster system that then also divided again using grid and cul de sac system. House type such as D21, D36, D45 dan M70 Perumnas Martubung Medan site is divided into cluster system that then also divided again using grid and parallel system. Housing type such as D29, D36 dan D54 Differences: Housing pattern is grid system which combines with another system according to the topography of housing location. Source: Author (2015) 6. Discussion Most of the residential units have been changed; the main cause is when the room can be no longer able to accommodate the activities while the number of occupants increases. Another factor is to increase the business space as an effort to increase the income of residents. The importance of observing changes in the sociodemographic, because the family is the basic profile of the occurrence of urban transformation. Some trends observed changes are new patterns of marriage, expectations of life and family relationships (Buzar et al., 2005). The deeper understanding of these dynamics can improve the quality of social, cultural and economic housing residents. Because cities simultaneously experiencing transformation and formed by patterns of consumption and mobility patterns of the family Lack of planned park spaces gives the impression of this area barren and dense. It also indicates neglect in environment planning. The maintain of the physical condition of the parks is not well. Some sports fields indicate the need for sports facilities for the occupants was not accommodated. Based on Shukur et al. (2010) parks offer opportunities for individual to enrich the quality of life at all ages and abilities. For those reasons, the allocations of parks in a residential area is important. Perumnas Simalingkar has almost complete facilities except for culture and recreation. Housing facilities are utilized together within housing occupants. This space utilization system often triggers conflict with city developer. The availability of this public space is often debated between the city public or only for housing occupants. Deng et al. (2013) suggest the concept of public space utilization in housing environment which states that the development and maintenance of public space should be owned by all occupants. This concept believed can increase the sustainability of both environment and social in the housing region. Evaluations toward community design are merely expressions of subjective opinion. Sherwin (1992) Discover a framework for community planners and designers to understand and evaluate the community. There are four major principle: (1) Function, for the convenience and comfort all of the users. Because the target of housing market is a group of middle and lower income people, the typology of houses built on the three public housing is almost the same with an area of 24 m2, 36 m2 and 54 m2. (2). Order assures that users can become oriented to the environment. Building pattern of three public housing is cluster form and grid pattern except Perumnas Simalingkar look more organic to produce flexible open spaces. (3). Identity denotes a visual image that reflects unique qualities. Characteristics occupants are almost the same but with different livelihood so that it appears in housing estate. (4).The appeal characterizes a design that gives a pleasure to its users. With the limitations of affordable building, prices cause of limited open space or parks Studies implication will be beneficial in planning livable community. e.g. transportation network in housing region. The walkable environment is one of the elements that could promote a city to be livable (Shamsuddin et al., 2013). Improving strategic planning in place shaping such as transportation network. Especially in planning walking and cycling paths because this concept will be by the economic level of the occupant of public housing. The public transport should only pass through the main road of the housing estate.

342 Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 7. Conclusion and recommendation Establishment of livable community in public housing which built by Perumnas will be easier because they have the same of management strategies, planning strategies dan design strategies. The parties which involve in housing development and management have the same goal which is to provide housing for low-income groups. To maintain the social dynamic of housing, will need a design concept for development of residential unit which appropriates with the development of the household economy and the living space. The use of the framework strategy of shaping place in public housing can help formatting of the livable community. This condition can improve the neighborhood quality of life in public housing. So that public housing is not only a temporary housing before the occupant move on to increases the economic level. The strategy of planning housing estate to form place shaping can be applied to other housing to reach a quality of life in the neighborhood. The same research method can be performed on other formal housing planning in the micro scale. The grounded theory method may involve enhancing the theory to determine what new concept can be added. Acknowledgement I would like to thank to Indonesia State Ministry of Research and Technology which have provided the research grant Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi to the researcher, so that the research can be accomplished. The highest appreciation goes to my undergraduate students in Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering University of Sumatera Utara which helped the researcher to collect data in the research. References Aulia, D. N. (2014). Planning livable community with social systems approaches : Medan, Indonesia. Presented at 2 nd International Conference on Sustainable Innovation (ICoSI 2014) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta 3 rd 5 th June 2014. Bajunid, A. F. I., Abbas, M. Y., & Nawawi, A. H. (2011). Tessellation Planning : Relationship between the physical environment and the neighborhood, Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior Studies, 3(7) 45-57. Buzar, S., Ogden, P. E., & Hall, R. (2005). Household matter : The quiet demography of urban transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 29(4), 413-436. Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum : a theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2 36. Coiacetto, E. (2013). Book reviews : Shaping places : urban planning, design and development by Davis Adams & Steve Tiesdell. London, Routledge, 2012, ISBN 9780415497978, Australian Planner, 51(1), 94-95. Dempsey, Nicola (2009) Are good-quality environments socially cohesive? Measuring quality and cohesion in urban neighbourhoods, TPR, 80(3), 315-345. Deng, W., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Yang, T. (2013). Environmental implication of privatised public space in gated residential neighbourhood : case study of china s small residential district, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(11), 944-949. Epley, D. R., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life, Social Indicator Research, 88, 281 296. Farahani, L. M., & Lozanovska, M. (2014). A framework for exploring the sense of community and social life in residential environments, Archnet-IJAR, 8(3), 223 237. Grant, B., & Dollery, B. (2010). Place-shaping by local government in developing countries : Lessons for the developed world. International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 251 261. Haarhoff, Errol J (2014) Book reviews : shaping places : urban planning, design and development by Davis Adams & Steve Tiesdell. London, Routledge, 2012, ISBN 9780415497978, Urban Policy and Research, 32(1), 113 115. Knight, A., & Ruddock, L. (2008). Advanced research methods in the built environment,. Oxford, UK: Willey-Blackwell Publishing. Lang, Jon (2013) Commentson the place shaping continuum : a theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19 (1), 41 43. Liu, Y. (2003). The aesthetic and the ethic dimensions of human factors and design. Ergonomics, 46(13/14), 1293-1305. Matthew, P. (2012). Book reviews : shaping places : urban planning, design and development by Davis Adams & Steve Tiesdell. London, Routledge, 2012, ISBN 9780415497978, Housing Studies, 29(1), 168 169. Nordwall, U., & Olofsson, T. (2013). Architectural caring. Architectural qualities feom a residential property perspective, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9, 1 20. Okunola, S., & Amole, D. (2013). Explanatory models of Perception of safety in a Public Housing Estate, Lagos, Nigeria, Journal of Asian Behavioral Studies, 3(8), 47-58. Pugalis, L. (2010). Viewpoint : It s all about place shaping, Journal of Urbanism, 3(2), 123 126.

Dwira Nirfalini Aulia / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 ( 2016 ) 336 343 343 Sapawi, R., & Said, I.(2013) Application of rasch model in constructing walkability indices for urban neighborhood area, Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 4, (12), 1 13. Shamsuddin, S., Abu Hassan, N. R., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2013). Walkable in order to be livable. Journal of Asian Behavioural Studies, 3(11), 111 121. Shirotsuki, M., Otsuki, S., & Sonoda, M. (2010). Bridging the gap between Planning and Environmental Psychology : an application of sense of place for visioning of public policy, Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior Studies, 1(3), 11-24. Sherwin, G. (1992) Cityshape : Communicating and evaluating community design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 177 190. Shukur, F., Othman, N., & Nawawi, A. H. (2010), The values of parks to the house resident. Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior Studies, 7, 85-95. Stevens, Q. (2009). Broken public spaces in theory and in practice. TPR 80 (4-5), 371-391. Syms, P. (2014). Book reviews : Shaping places : urban planning, design and development by Davis Adams & Steve Tiesdell. London, Routledge, 2012, ISBN 9780415497978, Journal of Urban Design, 19 Oxford. (1), 140 142.