MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 5 Date: 02-12-15 MR2011105-MDP-4 Pedestrian Walkway and Bridge, and the Preliminary submission of the ICC-B Site Development Plan Robert Kronenberg, Chief, Area 1. Robert.Kronenberg@montgomeryplanning.org (301) 495-2187 Marc DeOcampo, Master Planning Supervisor, Area 1. Marc.DeOcampo@montgomeryplanning.org (301) 495-4556 Tina Schneider, Senior Environmental Planner, Area 1. Tina.Schneider@montgomeryplanning.org (301) 495-2101 Staff Report Date: 01-29-15 The Planning staff received two voluntary submittals for comment from the United States Department of Defense, & the Army Corps of Engineers, on behalf of the Defense Intelligence Agency pertaining to the Intelligence Community Campus, Bethesda (ICC-B) South Campus. The campus is located at 4600 Sangamore Road and is approximately 30 acres. It is in ther-90 Zone within the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Master Plan area. Summary The Planning Board is being asked to provide advisory comments on the Pedestrian Bridge and Walkway; and the Preliminary Master Site Development Submission for the ICC -B campus. Staff is recommending the Board support the plan and transmit the recommendations to the Defense Intelligence Agency for their consideration. This is the fourth submittal of campus redevelopment that began with the Site Development Guide which was a general overview for the entire campus intentions. Additional plans were submitted in stages as funding became available for the North Campus Improvements, South Campus Improvements, and the current two part submittal. The first is the design of a pedestrian bridge from the existing parking garage to the Centrum main facility entrance, concrete walkway, lighting, and green-screen for the PEPCO substation. The second is the preliminary Master Site Development Plan that includes unifying the site through landscaping, hardscaping, stormwater management, and access controls and fencing. A final submittal is scheduled for mid-2015

SITE DESCRIPTION This 30 acre campus sits above the Potomac River on a river bluff. The drop to the Potomac River is approximately 150 vertical feet on the west side, or rear, of this site. Although forested, there is a filtered view from the river to two campus buildings: Roberdeau and Erskine Hall. The land between the ICC-B and the Potomac River is owned by the National Park Service. The campus shares its northern boundary with the Waldorf School which rents the Montgomery County public school building. It also shares a northern boundary with Sangamore Local Park, owned by MNCPPC. Across the Sangamore Road is a neighborhood of townhouses and beyond them garden apartments. Also across the street is a local shopping center, the Shops at Sumner Place previously known as Little Falls Mall. Next to the shopping center are the Sumner Highlands garden apartments. The only access to the campus for vehicles and pedestrians is from Sangamore Road onto Sentinel Drive. ICC-B Campus PURPOSE OF REVIEW There have been various stages associate with this plan. The first took place on September 22, 2011. The Planning Board reviewed the Site Development Guide (SDG) which set up the phasing for the ICC-B campus. On September 30, 2011, the M-NCPPC Planning Board Chair sent the National Capital Planning Commission Board comments (see Attachment A). At that time, the Planning Board requested the opportunity to review each phase of the campus design: Comment # 5 Submit site and landscape designs for mandatory referral review for each phase of the project. At that time, address consistency with the development standards in the zoning ordinance and, in consultation with the neighboring communities, the compatibility of the design with the community character. Include: Massing articulation and materials of the visible buildings; Landscape design to include the proposed fence;

Streetscape design subject to approval of the Montgomery County Department of Transportation; Setbacks and screening of views from the residential property to the south. [note: High Acres Limited Site Plan Amendment 82006022A May 2, 2013 Agenda] The National Capital Planning Commission responded by conveying and supporting our request. The Defense Intelligence Agency/United State Army Corps of Engineers (DIA/USACE) then agreed to voluntarily submit the designs for each phase of the project to the Planning Board for review. This submittal is part of the multi-step review process for the unification of the entire ICC-B Campus. All M-NCPPC comments will be submitted to the National Capital Planning Commission as a courtesy for use during their review process. PROCESS The Federal Workplace Element encourages federal agencies to consult with local agencies to ensure that federal workplaces enhance the design qualities and vitality of their communities and are compatible with the character of the surrounding properties, where feasible. Throughout the process, the Department of Defense has voluntarily and extensively coordinated with the community, its leaders, representatives, and multiple public agencies at all levels of government. The chart below outlines the phases and review by M-NCPPC and the National Capital Planning Commission. Previous Submittals September 2011 DIA/DIA Submittal Required 2012 Voluntary June 20-2013 January 16, 2014 January 2015 Voluntary Voluntary Voluntary Summary of Submittal Site Development Guidelines., Master Plan, for the ICC-B as a guide for future reviews of individual site and building projects. Preliminary and final site and building plans for ICC-B Phase 1, the North Campus with Parking Garage South Campus Improvements: The Centrum Building and Illustrations of Future Submittals. South Campus façade improvements to Roberdeau and Erskine Halls 1. Final site plan for the Pedestrian Walkway and Bridge. 2. Preliminary Submission of ICC-B Master Site Plan Development: overall community context; final site landscaping; hardscaping; perimeter access & fencing; and stormwater management

COMMENTS FOR TRANSMITTAL Bridge and Walkway Staff recommends improving uniformity and site integration by architecturally matching the columns and railing supporting the bridge with the pedestrian walkway columns between Erskine Hall and the Centrum Building. Staff recommends to improve uniformity and site integration by matching the exterior of the bridge girder with the spandrel panels supporting the pedestrian walkway between Erskine Hall and the Centrum Buildings As proposed, the Maury Hall and the Substation will be painted gray in color to match the colors of the Centrum, Erskine, and Roberdeau Hall. Consider an alternate color that integrates better with the naturalistic colors of the newly renovated campus buildings. Staff commends the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Corps for responding to the public s concern over the proposed covered walkway from the parking garage to the Centrum building. At the same time, the removal of any shelters along the path will pose future problems for visitors and employees during inclement weather. Consider a more discrete cover or shelters along the walkway. Staff recommends using porous concrete or other porous materials for the walkway instead of the proposed concrete surface. Master Site Development Staff recommends planting native groundcovers and/or shrubs along the interior pedestrian walkway path to enhance the experience and integrate plantings for a more naturalized landscape and improved site biodiversity. Ten feet of river rock and gravel treatment is proposed along the security fence line adjacent to the National Park Service boundary on the western side of the site, where no grass currently exists. The topography slopes west and north of the fence and contains a native plant forest. Staff is concerned that the proposed 2 or smaller gravel will migrate during storm events down the slope and into the NPS forest which could smother and kill native plant understory. We defer and support the preferences of the National Capital Planning Commission to make alternative recommendations in this sensitive area. Staff recommends supporting future recommendations by the National Capital Planning Commission regarding the proposed discharge of stormwater overflow from Area 3 that exceeds the 25-year storm event onto National Park property. Staff recommends additional native tree plantings on the north side of the parking facility, along the length of the north property line, and along Brooks Lane. Staff recommends the continuation of the partnership and ICC-B s sharing of the design progress with the surrounding community associations and citizens. SUBMISSION DESCRIPTION: Bridge and Walkway The major components of the Pedestrian Bridge and Walkway submittal include the bridge, concrete sidewalk, lighting, and green-screen at the substation. The project is intended to provide a connection between the existing parking garage, the Visitor Control Center building and the newly finished Centrum Hall. The preliminary design is envisioned to enhance the feel of one common, contiguous complex

and to emphasize the aesthetic goal of unity on the campus. The objective as stated in the report is for a coherent identity utilizing a minimal palette of materials and repeating the assembly components. The bridge installation will be a precast concrete bridge to span over the garage access roadway and the connecting sidewalk to the Visitor Control Center Building and the entrance to the newly completed Centrum. As noted in the Master Site Development Plan, the use of neutral colors for the materials is intended to allow for a minimal visual disruption and respect the building and campus aesthetics. The new bridge will enable pedestrians to traverse the roadway at the grade of the main campus from the multistory parking garage. Along with the bridge installation will be the addition of a new connecting concrete sidewalk from the bridge across the campus. The limit of disturbance for the Pedestrian Walkway and Bridge are approximately 5,000 square feet. In addition there will be minor re grading necessary to allow for the installation of the concrete sidewalk on grade and the installation of the precast bridge support structure. View of Bridge from the East View of Bridge from the Southeast

Lighting Light poles and cameras will be installed at approximately 150 foot intervals around the perimeter or as needed to provide a complete view of the perimeter and required lighting levels while minimizing light trespass outside the boundaries. Although not stated in the Master Site Development Plan, the project manager for the Defense Intelligence Agency indicated that the perimeter pole lighting is operational, will not be used for ambient light, and will remain off unless required during an emergency. The fixtures will be designed with directional elements and shielding to minimize up-lighting and glow which enable directional control of illumination, reducing light trespass around the perimeter. Cameras will be mounted on the side of the poles and will not add to the proposed 15 foot height. Green-Screen at Substation The existing PEPCO Substation building on the campus will receive a façade update with the installation of greenscreen wire mesh panels. The panels will cover the entire façade on three exposed sides of the substation and planted with Bignonia capreolata, a native perennial vine with a maximum height of 35-40 feet. It is staff s request that the greenwall ensure screening of the entire PEPCO substation from the communities view. Stormwater Management The Planning staff reviewed a modified version of the 35% design concept for stormwater management. The preliminary design achieves compliance with the Maryland Department of the Environment regulations and the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA). The EISA instructs federal agencies to "use site planning, design, construction, and maintenance strategies for the property to maintain or restore, to the maximum extent technically feasible, the predevelopment hydrology with regard to the temperature and rate of runoff for projects exceeding 5,000 square feet 1. The EISA federal guidelines require on-site retention of runoff from the 95 th percentile rainfall event, which equates to an on-site retention of runoff for the 1.7 inch storm event. The Maryland Department of Environment has two sizing criteria: one for new development; and one for redevelopment. Under MDE, new development requires the retention of the 1.0 inch storm event. MDE redevelopment standards require stormwater treatment for 50 percent of the existing impervious area, plus the net increase in impervious area within the stormwater management area. Significant stormwater (SW) has been integrated into the three major ICC-B campus redevelopment efforts: North Campus, Centrum Building façade, and the Roberdeau Hall/Erskine Hall Renovations. The Master Site Development stormwater concept achieves regulatory compliance through a combination of green infrastructure, and low impact development practices. Significant reductions in removing onsite impervious cover, reduced and attenuated peak runoff rates, and an increase in campus infiltratation have been made. Through the use of these techniques, the entire campus meets both MDE and EISA s stormwater requirements. The stormwater management design goals are to: Integrate the North Campus and South Campus into one coherent campus plan to mimic natural drainage conditions as economically practical Address MDE and EISA requirements and incorporate community input into the campus wide stormwater management strategy 1 http://www.epa.gov/greeningepa/stormwater/requirements.htm

Capture, infiltrate, and detain runoff from hardscape areas using integrated landscape principles to the maximum extent practical Treat, detain, and infiltrate runoff from new site pavements Integrate bioretention, infiltration, and underground storage into campus landscape development plan The stormwater management treatments are significant, diverse, and resolve the wrongs of past construction projects when treatment was not required on site. Not only will stormwater be treated, but the planted bioretention systems will improve biodiversity, habitat, and onsite beauty. Infiltration practices using underground chambers will significantly improve groundwater recharge and reduce stormwater runoff from the site. These treatments will quantifiably reduce peak flow stormwater runoff into the receiving streams and drainage swales surrounding the perimeter. Drainage Area 1 (North Campus): Both Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) and Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) stormwater requirements have been met (MDE-Permit #11SF0359). Treatment was provided via mechanical filtration and underground stormwater detention storage. Due to the compaction of existing soil stormwater infiltration was not feasible. In an effort to improve overall on-site infiltration treatments (above EISA standards) overcompensation in Drainage Area 3 has been achieved using an underground infiltration chamber. Drainage Area 2: Treatment requirements meet MDE and EISA standards via the removal of impervious hardscape surfaces, the installation of bioretention ponds, green roofs (Roberdeau Hall and Centrum building), and rooftop rainwater harvesting. Drainage Area 3: Drainage Area 3 is treatments needs have been reduced through the removal of existing impervious parking areas east of Roberdeau Hall; the removal of the Emory Building and its associated parking; rerouting of runoff from the Erskine Hall loading dock to on-site bioretention areas via a grass swale; bioretention, and underground infiltration chambers. Campus Drainage Areas

Stormwater Treatment provided for each Drainage Bioretention Systems OFFSITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT On September 4, 2012, the Maryland Department of the Environment informed the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), or its agent, that significant erosion and stability problems for which the campus is at least partially responsible must be addressed by DIA. The DIA commissioned a study to investigate the potential downstream drainage channel impacts resulting from development of the ICC-B site over time. The study was completed in early-april 2013 with input provided by MDE, National Park Service, the National Geospatial Agency (NGA), as former operator of the site, and the Department of the Army. The proposed treatment will reduce peak flow rates at each outfall for storms up to and including the 25- year storm event and will reduce flows to the drainage systems that carry flow across Brooke s Lane to Little Falls Branch. There will continue to be comprehensive analysis and coordination with National Parks Service to improve and mitigate channels along Wapakoneta Road, the Mid-Site Channel, and Southwest Channel along the southwest boundary of the ICC-B site. The Department of Defense has committed to provide further evaluation for the potential additional discharge reductions to the stormdrain crossing Brookes Lane.

LANDSCAPING The landscape design responds to the sites natural setting as requested by the Community, NCPC, and M-NCPPC. The plan will maintain the heavily forested areas to the site from the south, west, and northwestern borders. As noted in the original 2011 Master Site Development Guide, the landscape intent will be to incorporate native species endemic to the region to accentuate connectivity to the adjacent parkland. Part of the intent of the redevelopment is to be sensitive to the context and improve the appearance of the neighborhood. Efforts to provide compatible aesthetic to the residential and commercial neighborhoods east and south of Sangamore Road and Brooke s Lane have been made. This was accomplished through buffer planting and the elimination of surface parking along Sangamore Road. However, there are buffer gaps around the circumference of the property enabling views to the internal campus. Staff recommends additional native tree plantings on the north side of the parking facility, along the length of the north property line, and along Brooks Lane. Native canopy trees should be planted to provide a visual barrier to the campus. Internally, the differing site conditions, intentions of maintaining historical context, screening, operational requirements, community and security needs resulted in a series of ten different planting zones throughout the campus. The zones are woven into the site conditions including specimen tree protection, bioretention plantings, streetscape plantings, tree plantings (with and without security restrictions), and gateway plantings. Each zone has a native plant species palette with stratified plantings in the areas without security restrictions. GATEWAY The Gateway along Sangamore Road will have ornamental plantings of deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs and groundcovers. The plantings are not intended to be visual barrier to the internal campus, but instead provide filtered views from the public sidewalk. Stone pillars faced with sandstone recovered from the demolition of the Erskine Hall façade frame the fencing and entry gateway to accentuate the historic interpretive elements of the site. Cross section of the ICC-B Gateway along Sangamore Road. HERITAGE INTEPRETIVE TRAIL AND SIGNAGE Interpretive exhibits will be configured into the landscape to provide both publicly accessible interpretation as well as campus monuments. There will be three principal public viewing areas along Sangamore Road coordinated with the existing public bus stops and employee pedestrian entrance areas. The exhibits are still evolving but presently envisioned to provide a chronology of the site development and interpretive record of the significant contributions of the cartographic research and production professions housed at the site from 1942-present.

The Maryland Historic Trust and the Maryland State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed the master plan. In an effort to preserve many of the sites historic buildings, the Defense Intelligence Agency and SHPO have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement to ensure that the project is implemented in accordance with certain stipulations including the retention of Erskine, Maury, and Roberdeau Halls (excluding the brick facades); the retention of the Flagpole and Globe; and the development and implementation of a landscape plan that maintains the integrity of the Flagpole and Globe Memorial s setting. SECURITY FENCE Ten feet of river rock and gravel treatment is proposed along 6,000 linear feet of the security fence line adjacent to the National Park Service boundary on the western side of the site, where no grass currently exists. The topography slopes west and north of the fence and contains a native plant forest. Staff is concerned that the proposed 2 or smaller gravel will migrate down the slope and into the NPS forest which could smother and kill native plant understory. We defer and support the preferences of the National Capital Planning Commission to make alternative recommendations in this sensitive area. SITE DEMOLITION & ENTRY RECONFIGURATION The Emory Building and the Central Energy Plant are proposed for demolition during the latter part of 2015. The Erskine Utility Plant is being coordinated with a broader energy performance contract and will be accomplished as an independent effort projected. The main entrance to the campus will be reconfigured to create a serpentine configuration which will allow for traffic queuing inside of the campus rather than along Sangamore Road. This will significantly reduce the traffic along Sangamore Road that occurs as staff and guests enter and leave the campus. As requested by the community, the entrance off Sangamore Road will remain at Sentinel Drive.

OUTREACH The Defense Intelligence Agency/United State Army Corps of Engineers (DIA/USACE) has held a series of outreach meetings. These began shortly after the September 2011 public hearing at the Planning Board on the Site Development Guide, which is the campus master plan (see Attachment B). The outreach has since included regular meetings with a group of community leaders, meetings with a separate Traffic Committee, and nearly monthly meetings with the Community Stormwater Committee. Large public meetings for the entire community are also held at key points in the process. The development of this Master Site Design (MSD) submittal included a serious of local meetings facilitated by the ICC-B project team between March May 2014. The meetings were used to develop the 35% drawings and plan submitted to M-NCPPC in December 2014 for comments. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the Planning Board advise the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of the Army to continue to working with the community, the NCPC, and Planning staff to address items of concern raised in from the Preliminary Master Site Design plan and outlined in the Comments for Transmittal portion of this report. ATTACHMENTS A. September 30, 2011 memo from the M-NCPPC Planning Board Chair sent the National Capital Planning Commission Board B. List of public meeting conducted by the Defense Intelligence Agency

Department of Defense Community Outreach