PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED SWARTLAND SHOPPING MALL

Similar documents
PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ERF 3 ROBERTSON WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE

PROJECT INFORMATION. The type of development

AFRICAN HERITAGE CONSULTANTS CC 2001/077745/23

The following aspects have a direct bearing on the survey and the resulting report:

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

N O T I F I C A T I O N O F I N T E N T T O D E V E L O P

MOUNTAIN VIEW HERITAGE ASSESSMENT, GAUTENG

HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE. 10 June 2015 Version 13 for Comment

Heritage impact assessment for the PROPOSED BLUE HILLS EXTENSION 74 ON HOLDING 25, 32-34, BLUE HILLS AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, CITY OF JOHANNESBURG

BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Heritage Resources Management

Archaeological Monitoring of Land at 29 Royal Pier Road, Gravesend, Kent

Figure 7.10 Feature 2 Midden 1. Feature 3

VOLUME 2 REPORT: EIA REF NO:

MINIMUM STANDARDS: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL COMPONENTS OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTS

Comprehensive and Professional Solutions for all Heritage Related Matters CK 2006/014630/23 VAT NO.:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT. Background Information Document

Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage Assessment

N O T I F I C A T I O N O F I N T E N T T O D E V E L O P

CORNUBIA RETAIL PARK- PLANNING REPORT REVERT 3

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT. Proposed 10 MW Solar Photovoltaic farm, Grootvlei Powerstation, Grootvlei, Mpumalanga Province. Version 1.1.

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM MEETING SUMMARY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM UPDATE

TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 6A & 6B: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

Attention: Interested and Affected Party (I&AP) Commenting Period: 22 November January 2018 GNEC Code: 20327

Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork, School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen s University Belfast.

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Submitted: July 23, 2009

AND STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF JOHN LONINK ON BEHALF OF CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL SPECIFIC PURPOSE (GOLF RESORT) ZONE

Cape Environmental Assessment Practitioners(Pty)

APPENDIX 9: Archaeological Assessment by Ken Phillips

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID) AND INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE

Revised License Report

CPA , Bristoe Station and Kettle Run Preservation Study Comprehensive Plan Amendment

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

City of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

Comprehensive and Professional Solutions for all Heritage Related Matters CK 2006/014630/23 VAT NO.:

Barvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

APPENDIX F SPECIALIST ARCHAEOLOGY REPORT

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT:

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT: CONSTRUCTION OF NTUMBA VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ACROSS A STREAM IN ROOKDALE, OKHAHLAMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

7. The Landscape. 7.1 Introduction. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Scoping Report

Heritage Survey: Stellenbosch Rural Areas

HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC MONUMENTS AND MEMORIALS

Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent

9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage

For: Terratest (Pty) Ltd. Frans Prins Cell: Fax:

Fabriek Street 45 Paarl. P.O. Box 2632 Paarl Tel: Cell:

Proposed Residential Development at Church Stile Farm in Cradley, Herefordshire. Hazel Dormouse Surveys

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Joan Construction and Projects

Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Stephen White

Designations Team 3 year plan June 2016

Archaeological evaluation: land to the rear of Clare Road, Braintree, Essex

Draft Western District Plan

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Kier Infrastructure and Overseas Limited Greenburn Surface Mine, Dalgig Farm Site

Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014

Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program

H e r i t a g e I n v e s t i g a t i o n. C l i f t o n P r e c i n c t D e v e l o p m e n t A r e a C L I F T O N, C A P E T O W N.

Newcombe House & Kensington Church Street

Archaeological evaluation at Willowdene, Chelmsford Road, Felsted, Essex

Visual Specialist Opinion on Preferred Layout Alternative 4 September 2014 (Megan Anderson of MALA)

LYTTELTON GRAVING DOCK PUMPHOUSE (M36/327), CYRUS WILLIAMS QUAY, LYTTELTON: REPORT ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

Your dream Durbanville home that will suit both needs and desires, giving you value for your long-term investment.

RIVER MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION

Chitty Farmhouse Extension, Wall Lane, Silchester, Hampshire

14 Visual Amenity 14-1

R101 TO MORETELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY SOUTH BULK WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Rannoch 132 / 33 kv Substation Extension

Planning Proposal Concurrent DA/LEP Amendment for Belmont North Pharmacy Amendment No. 24 to Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plan (LMLEP) 2014

Settlement Boundaries Methodology North Northumberland Coast Neighbourhood Plan (August 2016)

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

Land North of Hall Road, Rochford. Rochford District Council. Planning Application Index. Prepared on behalf of Bellway Homes Ltd

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

HARTENBOS NORTH (population: Census 2011)

Understanding Wellington City s DISTRICT PLAN

APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

Pinnocks Wood Equestrian Centre, Burchett s Green, Maidenhead, Berkshire

Environmental Impact Assessment for Waterway Restoration Projects. Chris John, Technical Director Ecus Ltd.

Ref: A073350/SM/sm Date: 13 September 2013

THAT staff be authorized to proceed with the permanent road closure of Park Lane, within Hazelwood Cemetery.

PURPOSE OF MEETING MEETING GUIDELINES PROJECT BACKGROUND ESKOM CLOCOLAN-FICKSBURG 88 KV POWERLINE, FREE STATE

Bureau for Historic Preservation s Guidance for Historic Preservation Planning

Application Guide. Should you have any questions on the Outline Application please contact:

Foreword. Síle de Valera, TD, Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands

Ivol Buildings, Woodcote Road, South Stoke, Oxfordshire

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

Coquitlam River Riparian Planting

Transcription:

10 ( PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED SWARTLAND SHOPPING MALL Remainder Farm Tweefontein No. 696, Erf 2654 (Portion of Erf 327), Erf 9215 (Portion of Erf 2654) & Portion of Erf 327 Malmesbury Prepared for: ENVIROAFRICA CC Att: Mr Jerry Avis PO Box 5367 Helderberg 7135 Ph: (021) 851 1616 Fax: 0865120154 Client: PLOT 226 VAN RIEBEECKSHOF cc By "'t -( Agency for Cultural Resource Management P.O. Box 159 Riebeek West 7306 Ph/Fax: 022461 2755 Mobile: 082 3210172 E-mail: acrm@wcaccess.co.za HERITAG.'... _ -- ---.- ONTV.I'\. r--;c:j~-: ~c : : lved \ 2008-10 - l 0 \ / \..--==-:;;;;;~.-- -- RF NISHUlPBRON BESTuUR::nENS OCTOBER 2008 D Cape TownfJ<:aapstad 8000 " (0) t c,... ~~. van KUltuursake e"'~'

Executive summary A Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment of the proposed Swartland Shopping Mall in Malmesbury has identified no significant impacts to pre-colonial archaeological material that will need to be mitigated prior to the proposed development activities. The following findings were made: Two Stone Age tools were documented during the study. The archaeological remains have been rated as having low local significance.

Table of Contents Page Executive summary 1. INTRODUCTION 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 3. THE STUDY SITE 4. STUDY APPROACH 4.1 Method 4.2 Constraints and limitations 4.3 Identification of potential risks 4.4 Results of the desk top study 5. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS 5.1 The National Heritage Resources Act 5.2 Archaeology (Section 25 (4)) 5.3 Burial grounds and graves (Section 35 (3) 6. FINDINGS 7. IMPACT STATEMENT 8. RECOMMENDATIONS 9. REFERENCES 1 3 3 4 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 2

1. INTRODUCTION EnviroAfrica on behalf of Plot 226 Van Riebeeckshof cc requested that the Agency for Cultural Resource Management conduct a Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment for the proposed development of the Swartland Regional Shopping Mall in Malmesbury, in the Western Cape Province. The proposed site comprises four pieces of land; namely (a) farmland (b) show grounds (c) municipal reservoir site and (d) private school with details as follows: a) Remainder of the Farm Tweefontein No. 696, zoned Agriculture; b) Erf 2654 (Portion of Erf 327) which includes the existing Malmesbury show ground and is zoned Private Open Space; c) Erf 9215 (Portion of Erf 2654) which includes the Malmesbury Private Christian School and is zoned Private Open Space, and d) Portion of Erf 327 which includes commonage accommodating a municipal reservoir and is zoned Private Open Space The proposed project comprises eight phases and includes a regional shopping centre (or mall) with office space, private clinic, lifestyle centre, sectional title units, cluster housing, parking and roads. The extent of the proposed development (about 23 hal falls within the requirements for an archaeological impact assessment as required by Section 38 of the South African Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999). The aim of the study is to locate and map archaeological heritage sites and remains that may be impacted by the planning, construction and implementation of the proposed project, to assess the significance of the potential impacts and to propose measures to mitigate against the impacts. A Notification of Intent to Develop (NID) checklist has been completed by the town planner and heritage consultant Ms Lize Malan and submitted to Heritage Western Cape (Bel com) for comment. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The terms of reference for the archaeological study were: Identify and map pre-colonial archaeological heritage resources on the proposed site; Determine the importance of pre-colonial archaeological heritage resources on the proposed site; Determine and asses the potential impacts of the proposed development on precolonial archaeological heritage resources, and Recommend mitigation measures to minimize impacts associated with the proposed development 3

3. THE STUDY SITE A locality map is illustrated in Figure 1. An aerial photograph of the study site is illustrated in Figure 2. The proposed Swartland Regional Shopping Mall (S 33 26 41.8 E 18 43 23.9 on map datum wgs 84) is located in the Swartland region of the Western Cape Province and falls within the jurisdiction area of the Swartland Municipality, on the north western border of the town of Malmesbury, and some 70 km north of Cape Town. The receiving environment comprises agricultural land (to the north west), the Malmesbury Show Grounds, a municipal reservoir and the Malmesbury Christian Private School (Figures 3-8). The proposed site constitutes a highly disturbed and transformed landscape. The affected property is bordered by agriculture land (vineyards) to the north and the N7 on the west. No significant landscape features occur on the site. Surrounding land use comprises agriculture (vineyards and grazing) to the north and northwest, the Mount Royal Golf Estate to the west and residential housing to the south and east. 4

Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the study site. Figure 3. View of the site;h~n'g;;rth-;";"""""" Figure 4. View of the site facing south 5

Figure 5. View of the site facing south Figure 7. View of the site facing west Figure 8. View of the site facing west 4. STUDY APPROACH 4.1 Method The approach followed in the archaeological study entailed a ground survey of the proposed site. The site visit and assessment took place on the 10 th August, 2008. 4.2 Constraints and limitations There were no constraints or limitations associated with the study. 4.3 Identification of potential risks There are no potential (archaeological) risks associated with the proposed development.

4.4 Results of the desk top study The town of Malmesbury has been identified as a core area for large scale industrial, commercial and residential development. As a result, several archaeological impact assessments have been carried out in the area in the last few years. Early Stone Age (ESA) and Middle Stone Age (MSA) tools in Malmesbury were first documented during a study of the proposed Schoonspruit development, a large mixed use development situated within the urban edge of the town (Kaplan 2006a, 2007a). A few ESA tools were also documented on land identified for the planned Mount Royal Golf Estate (Kaplan 2004) situated alongside the N7 and the proposed Malmesbury Regional Shopping Centre, while several ESA tools were found on the farm Rooidraai about 5 kms further to the north west (Kaplan 2006b). ESA tools have also been recorded on the Farm Klipfontein immediately north of the proposed Regional Shopping Centre (Kaplan 2007b). Marginal scatters of Middle Stone Age and ESA tools were documented on the Farm Rozenburg, alongside the R302 (2007d). Further afield, ESA tools have been found on the Farm Amoskuil, about 2.5 kms south of Malmesbury, alongside the N7 (Kaplan 2007c) and Later Stone Age tools have been recorded on the Farm Olyvenhoek situated about 10 km south of Malmesbury on the Malmesbury Kalbaskraal road (Kaplan 2006c). ESA tools have been found on several smallholdings at Tierfontein about 10 kms south west of Malmesbury and on several farms surrounding the Perdeberg Mountain (pers. observation). All the above tools have been located in disturbed and mostly highly transformed landscapes. Studies undertaken to date in Malmesbury indicate that the region is not an area of precolonial archaeological importance. This may have much do with the fact that the region (the Swartland) has been characterised by intensive agriculture activities (mainly wheat farming) for more than 100 years and that the archaeological landscape has already been largely destroyed. 5. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS The following section provides a brief overview of the relevant legislation with regard to the archaeology of the subject property. 5.1 The National Heritage Resources Act (Act No. 25 of 1999) The National Heritage Resources (NHR) Act requires that "... any development or other activity which will change the character of a site exceeding 5 000m2, or the rezoning or change of land use of a site exceeding 10 000 m2, requires an archaeological impact assessment" The relevant sections of the Act are briefly outlined below. 5.2 Archaeology (Section 35 (4)) Section 35 (4) of the NHR stipulates that no person may, without a permit issued by HWC, destroy, damage, excavate, alter or remove from its original position, or collect, any archaeological material or object. 7

5.3 Burial grounds and graves (Section 36 (3)) Section 36 (3) of the HHR stipulates that no person may, without a permit issued by the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), destroy, damage, alter, exhume or remove from its original position or otherwise disturb any grave or burial ground older than 60 years, which is situated outside a formal cemetery administered by a local authority. 6. FINDINGS One broken Middle Stone Age quartzite flake and one possible Early Stone Age flaked quartzite cobble were documented in the vineyards alongside the N7. The archaeological remains have been rated as having low local significance. 7. IMPACT STATEMENT The Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment has identified no significant impacts to pre-colonial archaeological material that will need to be mitigated prior to the proposed development activities. The probability of locating important pre-colonial archaeological heritage remains during implementation of the project is likely to be improbable. 8. RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to the proposed Swartland Regional Shopping Mall, the following recommendations are made: Should any human remains be disturbed, exposed or uncovered during excavations and earthworks for the proposed project, these should immediately be reported to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (Dr Antionet Jerardino 021 4624502), or Heritage Western Cape (Mr Calvin van Wyk 021483 9692). Burial remains should not be disturbed or removed until inspected by the archaeologist. 8

9. REFERENCES Kaplan, J. 2007a. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed development Precinct 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 Malmesbury Western Cape. Portion of Erf 317, a Portion of Erf 7455, a Portion of Farm Oranje Fontein 1113, Portion of Farm 771 Rozenburg, Portion of Portion 1 of Farm 697 and a Portion of Portion 2 of Farm 695 Malmesbury. Report prepared for CK Rumboll and Partners. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2007b. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment Portion 2 of Farm 690 and Remainder of the Farm Klipfontein 688 (Glen Lily) Malmesbury. Report prepared for CK Rumboll. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2007c. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed development Portion 3 of the Farm Amoskuil 997 Malmesbury. Report prepared for New World Associates. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2007d. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed development proposed development Farm 771 Rozenburg Malmesbury. Report prepared for PHS Consulting. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2006a. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed development Schoonspruit Country Estate Portion of Erf 317, Portion of Erf 7455 & Erf 882 Malmesbury. Report prepared for CK Rumboll and Partners. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2006b. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed construction of an earth dam on Farm No. 1102 Rooidraai Malmesbury. Report prepared for Envirodinamik. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2006c. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed sand mining on a part of the Farm Olyvenhoek 818 Remainder, Malmesbury. Report prepared for Amathemba Environmental Management Consulting. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. Kaplan, J. 2004. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed Mount Royal Golf and Country Estate Malmesbury. Report prepared for EnviroAfrica. Agency for Cultural Resource Management. 9