Landmark Ordinance Update Task Force. March 9, 2018

Similar documents
Landmark Ordinance Task Force. Meeting 7 October 9, 2018

Designation Information

Review of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status

Steering Committee Meeting

District 9, Albus Brooks Blueprint Denver: Area of Change City and County of Denver, National Western Center

STAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, January 2016

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

CITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION CHAPTER MBMC PROCEDURES FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION

CITY OF DES MOINES LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Staff Report and Recommendation

THE COUTURE AT A GLANCE $122 MILLION TOTAL PROJECT COST 44 STORIES / 700,000 SQUARE FEET PUBLIC PLAZAS, PARK & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES 302 MARKET RATE

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

August 1, 2018 beginning at 12:30 p.m. in Room 400 of City Hall

CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

Architectural Inventory Form

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE A LANDMARK DISTRICT OVERLAY FOR THE CRAWFORDS VISTA LANDMARK DISTRICT

TRANSFORM BALTIMORE NEW ZONING CODE

TRANSFORM BALTIMORE NEW ZONING CODE. Laurie Feinberg, Asst. Director

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Architectural Inventory Form

Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Table A-4...Professional and Do-It-Yourself Improvement Expenditures by Homeowner Characteristics: 2007

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

Analysis of Environs of Clinton Park located at 901 W 5 th Street

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

Staff Report and Recommendation Based on the criteria for review in the Denver Zoning Code, Staff recommends approval for Application #2017I

Architectural Inventory Form

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

HISTORIC PRESERVATION: Community Identity Economic Development Sustainability

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Architectural Inventory Form

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) along Metro Rail Corridor Open House. A Regional Economic Development Opportunity

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1-1

Urban Planning and Land Use

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Historic Preservation Element

E O L A F I V E. Location Map SUMMARY G M P Z O N I T E M S # 1 A. & B.

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

Table A-4...Professional and Do-It-Yourself Improvement Expenditures by Homeowner Characteristics: 2013

NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING INITIATIVE

New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. Jonathan Kinney Senior Historic Preservation Specialist NJ Historic Preservation Office

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

Allston Brighton Boston College Task Force Meeting. Brighton Marine Health Center March 27, 2013

September 25th, 2018 $2000 fee pd CC

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Historic Resources. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant

California Preservation Foundation Historic Context Statements HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

East Central Area Plan

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

Source: Albemarle County Community Development 2010

McINTYRE PROJECT February 26, 2018

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWICH

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

COMMISSION ACTION FORM

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

HERITAGE ACTION PLAN. Towards a renewed Heritage Conservation Program. What is the Heritage Action Plan? Key areas of work. A Collaborative Approach

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Design Guidelines Update Strategy Report

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Transit Oriented Development. PB PlaceMaking Group RTD Planning & Development Committee May 4, 2010

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #16 February 22, 2018

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx

EXCERPTS. Sep City and County of Denver (CCD) Storm Drainage Master Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

GAINING LEVERAGE through

Receive recommendations from representatives of the Future Land Use Plan Advisory Committee regarding their review of the Land Use Element of the

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

C h a p t e r 3 E V A L U A T I O N A N D D E S I G N A T I O N. Background

12/4/20 Fine and Applied Arts City Planning and Landscape Architecture Karl B. Lohmann Papers, Box 1:

South fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Fire Sprinklers Working Group Final Report

Transcription:

Landmark Ordinance Update Task Force March 9, 2018

Pop Quiz! Denver Landmark Preservation is: A. The historical society B. A local non-profit organization C. City government group D. State government group 2

Denver Landmark Preservation is: A. The historical society B. A local non-profit organization C. City government group D. State government group 3

Denver Landmark Preservation 1967 Landmark Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 30 of Denver Revised Municipal Code) 4

Comprehensive Plan 2000 Historic Preservation Legacies Denver believes historic preservation of significant structures, features, and landscapes contribute to its distinctive character, environment, culture, economy and quality of neighborhoods Preserve Denver s architectural and design legacies while allowing new ones to evolve 5

Blueprint Denver (2002) Historic Preservation Historic preservation contributes to the sense of place and community across Denver s neighborhoods Designation is one of the most successful and common tools for Areas of Change and Areas of Stability 6

Plans and Partnerships 7

What was the first individual landmark designated in Denver? A. Daniels & Fisher Tower B. Emmanuel Shearith Israel Chapel C. Evans Memorial Chapel D. Molly Brown House 8

What was the first individual landmark designated in Denver? A. Daniels & Fisher Tower B. Emmanuel Shearith Israel Chapel C. Evans Memorial Chapel D. Molly Brown House 9

336 Individual Landmarks in Denver 10

What was the first historic district designated in Denver? A. Larimer Square B. Lower Downtown C. Quality Hill D. Smith s Ditch 11

What was the first historic district designated in Denver? A. Larimer Square B. Lower Downtown C. Quality Hill D. Smith s Ditch 12

53 Historic Districts in Denver 200 Block of S. Lincoln St. Alamo Placita Allen M. Ghost Baker Neighborhood Ballpark Neighborhood City Park Pavilion Civic Center Clayton College Clements Country Club Country Club Gardens Curtis Park A through H Denver City Beautiful Movement Parkways Downtown Denver Driving Park East Park Place East 7 th Avenue Five Points Florence F. Martin Ranch Frank S. Snell Subdivision Grant Street Humboldt Street Humboldt Street Park Avenue Lafayette Street Larimer Square Lower Downtown Lowry Officer s Row Lowry Technical Training Center Montclair Morgan s Subdivision Ninth Street Park Old Highland Business District Packard s Hill Park Avenue Pennsylvania Street Potter Highlands Quality Hill S.R. DeBoer Sherman-Grant Smith s Ditch Speer Boulevard Swallow Hill W. 28 th Avenue Witter-Cofield Wolff Place Wyman 13

~4% of the city, or 1 in 25 structures, are designated 14

Benefits of Historic Preservation 15

16

17

18

Does Landmark staff initiate designations? A. Yes B. No 19

Does Landmark staff initiate designations? A. Yes B. No 20

Designation Applications Community-driven process Individual property owners Members of the community may initiate designation applications Landmark staff helps an applicant navigate the designation process 21

Regulatory Tools Designation is a regulatory tool to preserve the character of an area

Regulatory Tools Designation vs. Rezoning Process Landmark Designation Rezoning CPD staff has pre-application meeting with applicant to discuss process Applicant contacts City Council member and performs community outreach Applicant prepares application Application submitted to CPD CPD staff reviews application CPD staff analyzes criteria and writes staff report Public Hearing at CPD Board/Commission Landmark Preservation Commission Planning Board City Council Public Hearing

Designation Applications Possible applicants for designations: Owner(s) of the property Three people who are: Residents of Denver Property owners in Denver Have a place of business in Denver Manager of Community Planning and Development Member(s) of City Council Landmark Preservation staff is not the applicant. 24

Chapter 30, DRMC Property must: 1. Maintain historic and physical integrity 2. Meet a designation criterion in at least 2 of the following categories History Architecture Geography 3. Relate to a historic context or theme

Designation Criteria: 1. History a. Have direct association with the historical development of the city, state or nation; b. Be the site of a significant historic event; or c. Have direct and substantial association with a person or group of persons who had influence on society. 2. Architecture a. Embody distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or type; b. Be the significant work of a recognized architect or master builder; c. Contain elements of architectural design, which represent a significant innovation d. Portray the environment of a group of people or physical development of an area in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. 3. Geography a. Have a prominent location or be an established, familiar and orienting visual feature of the contemporary city; b. Promote understanding and appreciation of the urban environment by means of distinctive physical characteristics or rarity; c. Make a special contribution to Denver s distinctive character 26

Denver Landmark Preservation 2 of 3 History Historical development of the city, state or nation; Significant historic event; or Person or group of persons who had influence on society Architecture Distinguishing characteristics of style or type; Work of a recognized architect or master builder Geography Prominent location or orienting visual feature; Rarity; Contribution to Denver s character National Register 1 of 4 A: Event Events and broad patterns of our history B: Person Significant persons in our past C: Design/Construction Distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or work of a master D: Archaeology Important in history or prehistory Colorado Register 1 of 5 A: Event Events that contribution to history B: Person Persons significant in history C: Design/Construction Distinctive characteristics of a type, or period, of construction, or artisan D: Geography The geographic importance of the property E: Archaeology Important in prehistory or history 27

Nationwide context Reviewed 32 cities, including: Other Colorado cities with preservation staff Boulder, Fort Collins, Greeley, Aspen Peer cities Austin, Portland, Seattle Geographic comparisons Kansas City, SLC, Omaha, Phoenix, Albuquerque Similar population Baltimore, Atlanta, Boston, Milwaukee Larger population LA, NY, Chicago, Philadelphia, Dallas, San Francisco Criteria Requirements Number of Cities 1 out of 10 3 10% 1 out of 9 1 11% 1 out of 8 2 13% 1 out of 7 2 14% 1 out of 6 2 17% 1 out of 5 2 20% 1 out of 4 13 25% 2 out of 7 1 29% 1 out of 3 1 33% 2 out of 5 1 40% 2 out of 4 3 50% Percentage of criteria required 2 out of 3 Denver 67% 28

Does designation mean you can t make changes to a building? A. Yes B. No 29

Does designation mean you can t make changes to a building? A. Yes B. No 30

Landmark doesn t review: x Paint colors x Repairs and maintenance x Storm windows x Plants x Interior alterations Landmark does review: Exterior work that requires a building or zoning permit Curb cuts Window and door replacement 31

Provides clear and predictable regulations Addresses wide range of topics Includes character-defining features for historic districts

17 applications for solar installation in 2017 1 % of design review applications 88% of solar applications were administratively approved 34

On average, how long does it take to obtain approval for alterations or additions? A. 1 week B. 2-3 weeks C. 3-4 weeks D. More than 4 weeks 35

On average, how long does it take to obtain approval for alterations or additions? A. 1 week B. 2-3 weeks C. 3-4 weeks D. More than 4 weeks 36

~80% of Landmark design reviews are administrative approvals Must meet the Design Guidelines Landmark staff receives ~1600 applications annually Quick Reviews typically approved in 1 business day Reroofing with same material Replacing existing rear or side fences Replacing existing AC units Replacing existing rear decks Smaller projects typically approved in 10-15 business days New fences Garages Solar panels Small rear additions Alterations at side or rear 37

Plan Review and Permitting Design Review Landmark Preservation Commission Appointed by the Mayor Commission Reviews Infill construction Large additions Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) Historic window replacements Projects that do not meet Design Guidelines 38

Plan Review and Permitting Design Review Lower Downtown Design Review Board Appointed by the Mayor Board reviews projects in Lower Downtown Historic District Infill construction Large additions Historic window replacements 3D projecting signs Projects that do not meet Design Guidelines 39

2017 Landmark Design Review 16% 38% 4% 42% Total Number of Applications: 1626 Total percentage of administrative reviews: 80.3% Quick Reviews LPC/LDDRB - Design Review Adminstrative Staff Reviews LPC/LDDRB - Consent Agenda 40

40.0% Percentage of Reviews per Project Type - 2017 35.9% 30.0% 20.0% 20.1% 10.0% 0.0% 2.6% 1.0% 3.8% 6.6% 2.4% 2.1% 7.9% 0.4% 6.3% 1.0% 3.1% 1.2% 4.3% 0.4% 1.8% Additions ADU Alterations Fences/Site Work Garages Infill Mechanical/Electrical Poptop/Rooftop Additions Reroofing Signage Solar Tax Credits Telecom Windows/Doors Zone-Lot Amendments Multiple Project Types Other

600 500 Reviews per Project Type - 2017: Administrative Reviews (green) vs. Board/Commission Reviews (blue) (Number corresponds to percentage of project type that is administratively reviewed) 99% 400 300 93% 200 100 0 50% 16% 73% 86% 74% 0% 99% 0% 61% 88% 0% 96% 56% 0% 50% Addition ADU Alterations Fences/Site Work Garage Infill Mechanical/Electrical Poptop/Rooftop Additions Reroofing Signage Solar Tax Credits Telecom Windows/Doors Zone-Lot Amendments Multiple Project Types Other

Can you increase density in historic districts? A. Yes B. No 43

Can you increase density in historic districts? A. Yes B. No 44

Additions Rooftop Additions and Poptops 7 applications for rooftop additions and poptops in 2017 0.4% of design review applications Rooftop additions and poptops are all reviewed by LPC or LDDRB Other Additions to Historic Structures 42 applications for rear or side additions in 2017 2.6% of design review applications 48% of additions were approved administratively

Accessory Dwelling Units 17 applications for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in 2017 1.0% of design review applications ADUs are always reviewed by the LPC

Infill Construction 34 applications for infill construction in 2017 2.1% of design review applications Infill projects are always reviewed by LPC or LDDRB

Does Landmark staff review demolitions outside of historic districts? A. Yes B. No 48

Does Landmark staff review demolitions outside of historic districts? A. Yes B. No 49

Demolition and CNHS Review Demolition and Certificates of Non-Historic Status Applications Reviewed by Landmark Preservation - 2017 33 18 82 Demolitions Reviewed (85.2%) CNHS Reviewed (12.1%) Properties Posted (4.9%) 575 Demolitions within Historic Districts (2.7%) 50

Plan Review and Permitting Demolition and CNHS Review

Plan Review and Permitting Demolition and CNHS Review

Landmark Ordinance Update Landmark Ordinance Chapter 30 DRMC Established in 1967 by City Council Numerous updates over the past 50 years 53

Landmark Ordinance Establishes authority and procedures for: District and individual designations Review, permitting, and enforcement Demolition Review Landmark Preservation Commission Lower Downtown Design Review Board 54

Landmark Ordinance Updates Recent Chapter 30 Updates 2006 Amended to include demolition and Certificate of Non-Historic Status review Community-initiated designation applications 2012 Amended to allow designation applications to be submitted by Manager of CPD, City Council members Proposed Ordinance Update Address biggest issues that will make highest impact Minor cleanups and clarifications will be addressed separately Align Lower Downtown Design Review Board and Landmark Preservation Commission process and procedures Fix typos, add minor clarifications 55

Landmark Ordinance Update What improvements can be made to designations resulting from demolitions or Certificates of Non- Historic Status? Is there room for mediation in the designation process? What are options for preserving neighborhood character? How can we reduce the environmental impact of demolitions? How best to document support and opposition of historic district designations? What are ways to incentivize voluntary designation? 56