STAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, January 2016
|
|
- Conrad Lyons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO p: f: STAFF BRIEF This document is the staff s comparison of the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation, Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, the Landmark Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 30, Revised Municipal Code) and other applicable adopted area guidelines as applied to the proposed application. It is intended to provide guidance during the commission s deliberation of the proposed application. Guidelines are available at Project: #2018-COA-516 LPC Meeting: January 8, 2019 Address: 636 Clayton Street Staff: Krystal Marquez Historic Dist/DLM: East 7 th Avenue Historic District Year structure built: C.1933 (Period of Significance: Prior to and Including 1943) Council District: #10 Wayne New Applicant: Jere Hart, Homeowner Project Scope Under Review: Site Work Retaining Wall, Basic red stackable retaining wall block Staff Summary: The applicant, Jere Hart, is requesting approval for a half-circle retaining wall constructed of red stackable retaining wall block that was installed sometime between at 636 Clayton Street. The retaining wall will be setback from the sidewalk 16 feet and is built at the top left side of the sloped front yard adjacent to an existing brick stair walkway from the sidewalk. The applicant has provided photo examples of other retaining walls of similar retaining wall blocks in the district at: 607 Clayton St, 610 Steele St (which is outside of the district), 624 Milwaukee St, 649 Milwaukee St, 628 Columbine St and retaining wall block on Detroit St. The retaining wall at 636 Clayton St has not previously been reviewed and approved, therefore the Commission will be retroactively reviewing this item. Registered Neighborhood Organization (RNO) comments: RNO review of the proposed project scope is not required. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, January 2016 Guideline 5.3 Plan new site and landscape features to respect the characterdefining features of the historic district or individually-designated Denver landmark. a. Landscape the street-facing portion of a lot to be consistent with historic landscape patterns on the street, such as matching Meets Guideline? Comments The proposed red stackable block retaining wall will have minimal visual impact on the character defining features of the East 7 th Avenue Historic District and is consistent with the placement of similar features within the district. The addition of a retaining wall will not create a false sense of history as retaining walls are
2 tree types where one is missing along a consistent tree row. b. Where an established tree has been removed, replace it with a similar species. c. When introducing a new site feature or modifying an existing feature, such as a stairway, fence or retaining wall, respect historical patterns in terms of placement, proportions and design compatibility with surrounding historic context. d. When designing a new sidewalk or path, use colors, styles and finishes similar to those seen in nearby historic sidewalks. e. Avoid introducing new site features that convey a false sense of history. f. Avoid introducing new readily visible site features, such as curb cuts, which were not historically present on the property, or prevalent in the historic district. common to the East 7 th Avenue Historic District. See comments under guideline 5.11 and Avoid adding a new retaining wall unless necessary and all alternatives have been explored. a. Add a new retaining wall that will alter the slope of a Denver Hill front yard area only where at least one of the following conditions is present:» The Denver Hill is not a characterdefining feature of the historic district.» There is a high level of variety in the treatment of front yard areas among adjacent properties, including retaining walls.» The front yard slope is unstable, threatens the foundation of a historic structure, and other stabilization strategies have failed. Rolling front lawns are common within the East 7 th Avenue Historic District. The application for designation talks extensively on the landscape design of the East 7 th Avenue Historic District in relations to two famous landscape architects, S.R. DeBoer and Jane Silverstein Ries, although it recognizes the prominence of the Hill it does not preclude alterations to the Hill. The designations states [Jane] Silverstein Ries supplies the solution. The hills are made from the dirt excavated to build the residences. More economical than paying someone to haul dirt away, the practice provided a landscape opportunity that early owners desired. To have the suggestion of the hills rather than flatter prairie land had great appeal. It is interesting to note the hills are less predominant as one moves east in 7 th Avenue. This is happening as the architecture increasingly reflects the influence of Chicago School. Silverstein Reis has long advocated capturing additional living space from the hills by designing imaginative retaining walls. The application further states Landscape architects Saco Reinke DeBoer and Jane Silverstein Ries provided leadership for 7 th Avenue residents to pursue an exciting array of approaches for landscaping residences. The richness of the landscaping, like the richness of the architecture, lies in the variety
3 Retaining walls are common within the East 7 th Avenue Historic District and they are not out of character for the district nor precluded as a possible landscape option in the application for designation Locate and design a new retaining wall to minimize impacts on the historic district or historic property (when warranted based on the criteria in Guideline 5.11). a. Use a low kick wall, up to one foot in height, to help stabilize the yard while maintaining most of the historic slope. b. Design a new retaining wall to minimize visual impacts on the character defining features of the historic property, block and district. c. Use materials that are common to the historic district or that relate to the historic property. For example, if a stone wall is a part of the design tradition, the wall should be stone, or stone-faced. d. Avoid using terraced retaining walls. e. Do not completely replace the slope with a tall retaining wall. The proposed half-circle retaining wall was designed to give the homeowner additional flat area at the top of the hill and has minimal visual impacts on the district. It is setback approximately 16 feet from the sidewalk edge near the top of the hill. The wall will be constructed out of red stackable retaining wall block which has been used in other areas of the district. The proposed wall is not terraced and is only located on the left side of the yard nor does it completely replace the slope of the front yard. Recommendation: Basis: Approval The Denver Hill, while prominent in East 7 th Avenue Historic District, is not identified as a character defining feature in the application for designation and retaining walls are encouraged by two of the districts famous landscape architects to expand outdoor living space (5.11). The proposed retaining wall will have minimal visual impact on the district and is compatible in material design (5.12) Suggested Motion: I move to APPROVE application #2018-COA-516 for the site work, including a retaining wall at 636 N Clayton Street, as per design guidelines 5.3, 5.11, and 5.12, character-defining features for the East 7 th Avenue historic district, presented testimony, submitted documentation and information provided in the staff report.
4 East 7 th Avenue Historic District with 636 Clayton Street outlined in red
5 1929 (corrected 1937) Sanborn Map with 636 Clayton Street outlined in red END
STAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Lower Downtown Historic District Appendix A: Standards and Guidelines for Signs (November 2014)
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project: 2016-COA-356 Meeting: September 8, th Street Oxford Hotel
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 20 West Colfax, Dept. 205 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org This
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Design Guidelines for Lower Downtown Historic District, Appendix A: Standards and Guidelines for Signs (2014), pg.
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationReview of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status
Review of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status -Adopted by the Landmark Preservation Commission 4/15/14 Community Planning & Development Policy Landmark Preservation 8/15/14 Per Section
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Lower Downtown Historic District Appendix A: Standards and Guidelines for Signs (November 2014)
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org
More informationDesignation Information
Structure for Preservation Designation Information Preparing and Filing Your : Please complete each section of the application. The application must be typed. Use paper no larger than 11 X17 for supplemental
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC2014-00362 259 South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant:
More informationMorgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features
Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features DISTRICT DESCRIPTION This small addition, designed as a neighborhood for those wishing to move east from Capitol Hill, was predominantly
More informationHendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines
Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines Adopted May 16, 2007 Revised September 15, 2010 Drafted by the members of the Proposed Main Street
More informationLandmark Ordinance Update Task Force. March 9, 2018
Landmark Ordinance Update Task Force March 9, 2018 Pop Quiz! Denver Landmark Preservation is: A. The historical society B. A local non-profit organization C. City government group D. State government group
More informationCPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines
CPD Rules and Regulations Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines Denver Planning Board May 4 th, 2016 Sponsor & Community Partners Sponsored by Albus Brooks, Council District 9 Developed
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Park Strip Raised Planter Boxes Minor Alteration PLNHLC2014-00603 163 D Street Meeting Date: November 6, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic
More informationDENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP
DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP Urban Design Standards and Guidelines November 17, 2008 Amended February 3, 2016 City and County of Denver CF Property Management, Inc. C/O Denver Design District - Starboard
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL
CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL AGENDA PART 1: FRAMEWORK 1. Objectives and Background
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 23, 2018 TO: FROM: Planning Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Consideration of an appeal of the Community Development
More informationAttachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report
Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background, Policy Framework and the Preparation of Urban Design Reports 1. Introduction
More informationBaker Historic District
DISTRICT DESCRIPTION This is a historically middle-class neighborhood in the South Side, an area annexed by Denver in 1883, consisting of more than 20 tightly interwoven residential subdivisions. The earliest
More informationAnalysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church
Item No. 3: L-14-00028 p.1 Analysis of Environs of New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church Step One Historical Significance and Context According to the application for Historic Landmark Designation,
More informationTO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:
Community Planning and Development Planning Services 201 W. Colfax Ave., Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2915 f: 720.865.3052 www.denvergov.org/cpd TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock,
More informationFront Yard Parking Appeal 103 Roslin Avenue
REPORT FOR ACTION Front Yard Parking Appeal 103 Roslin Avenue Date: April 5, 2017 To: North York Community Council From: Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services Toronto and East York
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationCertificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019
Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019 CONSENT Filing Date: December 6, 2018 Case No.: 2018-016426COA Project Address: 1088 SANSOME STREET Historic Landmark: Northeast
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationPLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2011
# 11 ZON2011-02680 PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2011 NAME LOCATION Alabama Power Company East side of Navco Road 130 ± South of Columbus Avenue CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT District 4 PRESENT
More informationLong Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report Date: October 26, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Etobicoke York Community Council Director, Community Planning,
More informationSeptember 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403-1388 RE: Station Park Green Dear
More informationTULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT Thursday, August 6, 2015 COA-15-037 COA NUMBER: COA-15-037 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1724 SOUTH MADISON AVENUE DISTRICT: NORTH MAPLE RIDGE HISTORIC DISTRICT
More informationFront Yard Parking Appeal 91 Ashdale Avenue
REPORT FOR ACTION Front Yard Parking Appeal 91 Ashdale Avenue Date: March 14, 2017 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services Toronto and
More information1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall)
L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N S t a f f R e p o r t FOR COMMISSION ACTION FEBRUARY 3, 2011 1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall) Structural Alteration Permit Application (LM
More informationCounty of Loudoun. Department of Planning MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: ZMOD , Dulles North Business Park Comprehensive Sign Plan, 2 nd Referral
County of Loudoun Department of Planning MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2014 TO: FROM: Ginny Rowen, Project Manager Land Use Review Pat Giglio, Planner III Community Planning SUBJECT: ZMOD 2013-0001, Dulles
More informationSlot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017
Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017 MEETING OBJECTIVES Review Staff Recommended Strategy for Mixed Use and Main Street districts Confirm the Strategy for the Mixed Use and Main Street
More informationDemolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue
REPORT FOR ACTION Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property - 421 Roncesvalles Avenue Date: March 8, 2018 To: Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Chief Planner
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE Codes analyses for each subcommittee were completed to assist participants of the Richland County Site Planning Roundtable.
More informationII. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural
More informationBUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5
VISION STATEMENT 3 UTILIZATION OF THE GUIDELINES 3 IMPLEMENTATION 3 PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN REVIEW 3 LAND USE AND ZONING 4 LAND USE 4 ELEMENTS:... 4 ZONING 4 ELEMENTS:... 4 BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5
More informationBE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWICH
ORDINANCE 1769 ADOPTED 7/2/2018 PUBLISHED 7/4/2018 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORWICH, CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR A VILLAGE DISTRICT
More informationVillage of Glenview Plan Commission
Village of Glenview Plan Commission STAFF REPORT January 22, 2019 TO: Chairman and Plan Commissioners CASE #: P2018-047 FROM: Community Development Department CASE MANAGER: Tony Repp, Senior Planner SUBJECT:
More informationGUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER
GUIDING PRINCIPLES The guiding principles and design concepts in this chapter work together with the Chapel Hill 2020 Comprehensive Plan to support new public places that can be enjoyed by all while also
More informationNEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road
NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road For this location, there are two applicable plans that provide guidance on development. The two plans include the Indian School Specific Plan (1991) and the
More informationTHE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA
THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA LETTER OF DECISION Ark of Safety, Inc. Mobile, AL 36617 Re: (Northwest corner of Main Street and First Avenue, extending to the Southwest corner of Esau Avenue and Main Street.)
More informationYouth Category Award
the HERITAGE WINNIPEG PRESENTS 33rd Annual Preservation Awards 2018 NOMINATION FORM Since 1985, Heritage Winnipeg, a nonprofit, charitable organization established in 1978, has celebrated the Annual Preservation
More informationDesign Guidelines. High Point Estates Design Guidelines April Gomberoff Bell Lyon Architects Group Inc.
High Point Estates April 2006 Gomberoff Bell Lyon Architects Group Inc. 1 29 Contents Part One The Building Scheme Part Two Architectural Character and Siting Building Part One: The Building Scheme i 31
More informationHistoric District Commission
Historic District Commission Page 1 of 14 Staff Report January 2 nd, 2018 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS / OLD BUSINESS: Administrative Approvals: 1. 454 Middle Street - Recommend Approval 2. 24 Johnson Court -
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)
Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item Manufacturing Districts Monument Sign Height Zoning Text Amendment PLNPCM2013-00197 Citywide August 28, 2013 Planning Division Department of Community
More informationCITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134
A GUIDE TO THE LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROCESS INTRODUCTION The City of Geneva is a residential community characterized by fine examples of many significant architectural styles dating from the mid-1800s
More informationCITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission
Clay Curtin, Management Analyst (I the same walls at a maximum of 1 foot tall. Section 7.36.150 of the Municipal Code permits BY: Eric Haaland, Associate Planner right-of-way) between walkways leading
More informationM E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: Certificate
More informationC-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:
C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that
More informationStaff Report and Recommendation Based on the criteria for review in the Denver Zoning Code, Staff recommends approval for Application #2017I
TO: Denver City Council Land Use, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Theresa Lucero, Senior City Planner DATE: RE: Official Zoning Map Amendment Application #2017I-00149 Staff Report and
More informationCHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Introduction This chapter provides design guidelines for public sector improvements in the downtown. This includes streetscape design, as well as the
More informationNeighborhood Patterns
A PATTERN BOOK FOR NEIGHBORLY HOUSES NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS B Neighborhood Patterns The character and quality of our neighborhood streets and parks are, in large part, created by the design of the houses
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationPreservation & Design Awards
EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION Preservation & Design Awards 2018 Nomination Form The Evanston Preservation Commission is pleased to call for nominations for the 2018 Evanston Preservation & Design Awards.
More informationexpectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E
expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E 1 April 2004 W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E expectations for new development Introduction and Intent This statement of expectations for development
More informationCHAPTER 3 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA
CHAPTER 3 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA 3.1 INTRODUCTION The Downtown Commercial District Character Area of Grass Valley comprises all of the city's core historic commercial district, including
More informationTO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 17,2007
TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 17,2007 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Appeal of a Decision by the Historic Preservation Commission to Deny a Certificate of Appropriateness for Installation of French Doors
More informationTazewell Pike. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines
Tazewell Pike Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines Knoxville Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission November 2, 2000 These design guidelines were: Adopted by the Knoxville
More informationAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
Provo City Planning Commission Report of Action October 26, 2016 ITEM 10 Provo City Parks and Recreation Department requests a variance to the Sensitive Lands Ordinance to grade within a hillside of 30%
More informationCITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT URBAN PLANNING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMISSION - CERTIFICATE
More informationSun City Lincoln Hills ARC Application Checklist
Sun City Lincoln Hills ARC Application Checklist Landscape Plants & Trees Checklist 19 It is recommended that the Owner or Landscape Architect/Designer/Contractor attend the ARC meeting to answer any questions
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationDistrict 9, Albus Brooks Blueprint Denver: Area of Change City and County of Denver, National Western Center
To: Landmark Preservation Commission From: Kara Hahn, Principal Planner, Community Planning & Development (CPD) Date: December 10, 2018 RE: Landmark Designation for the Armour & Company Administration
More informationSteering Committee Meeting
Neighborhood Planning Initiative NPI EAST CENTRAL AREA PLAN Steering Committee Meeting November 9, 2017 6:00PM 8:00PM Tears McFarlane House East Central Area Plan Steering Committee Meeting 11/9/17 AGENDA
More informationTOWN OF BURLINGTON Conservation Commission
TOWN OF BURLINGTON Conservation Commission MINUTES OF Approved May 26, 2016 Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Chair L. Cohen, K. Melanson, I. Deb, A. McNamara Vice-Chair W. Boivin, J. Lynch,
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationThe Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationCITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: October 13,2011 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CASE: Variance 7717 Design Review 11-163 Coastal Development
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: Urbana Plan Commission FROM: Kevin Garcia, Planner II DATE: October 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Plan Case Nos. 2314-PUD-17 and
More informationHistoric District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015
Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015 Page 1 of 36 8. 54/58 Ceres Street (Minor HVAC units (roof-mounted)) 9. 67-77 State Street (Minor Revise windows and doors) 10. 143
More informationChapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Publication has been developed to provide current, uniform procedures and guidelines for the application and design of safe, convenient, efficient
More informationVillage of Glenview Appearance Commission
Village of Glenview Appearance Commission STAFF REPORT September 10, 2014 TO: Chairman and Appearance Commissioners FROM: Community Development Department CASE #: A2014-043 LOCATION: PROJECT NAME: 600-670
More informationSouth fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership
South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines The Planning Partnership Table Of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1.1 Function of Architectural Design Guidelines 1.2 Administration
More informationMULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for
More informationRequest by Fareway Stores Inc. to Initiate Neighborhood Commercial Zoning Text Amendments
ITEM: 26_ Staff Report Request by Fareway Stores Inc. to Initiate Neighborhood Commercial Zoning Text Amendments BACKGROUND: August 14, 2018 Fareway has an interest in redeveloping the site of their Downtown
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay
Applicant/Owner Ocean Rental Properties, LLC Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront
More informationD E S I G N R E V I E W B OA R D
Agenda Report City of Great Falls D E S I G N R E V I E W B OA R D February 28, 2011 C O N T R A C T F L O O R I N G N EW B U I L D I N G Case Number DRB2011-2 Applicant Steve L Heureux (LPW Architects)
More informationPETITION NUMBER(S): V10-002
PETITION NUMBER(S): V10-002 PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 325 Gunston Hall Circle DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 927 OVERLAY DISTRICT NORTHWEST FULTON EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACREAGE 1.11 EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY
More informationLandscaping And Site Details
Landscaping And Site Details Adopted by the Barrio Latino Commission on August 20, 1996 Addition to Ybor City Design Guidelines, Street Furniture. The City of Tampa maintains and is responsible for installation
More informationPreserving Green Streetscape Character on Hillside Drive
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Preserving Green Streetscape Character on Hillside Drive Date: February 19, 2014 To: From: Toronto and East York Community Council Deputy City Manager, Cluster B Wards: Toronto-Danforth,
More informationTULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION HP PERMIT SUBCOMMITTEE - STAFF REPORT Thursday, October 6, 2016 HP-16-073 HP PERMIT NUMBER: HP-16-073 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1615 SOUTH NORFOLK AVENUE DISTRICT: NORTH MAPLE RIDGE
More informationCOMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL
COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL The following checklist summarizes development guidelines and standards. See the appropriate section for a complete explanation of the
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director
MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2019 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director SUBJECT: Camino Square, IDA No. CRP-16-02, located at 171
More informationOfficial Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies
PG.30.1 REPORT FOR ACTION Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies Date: May 15, 2018 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
More informationThe Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017
& PUD-0000102-2017 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL
More informationZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013
ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013 NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION DIP Exchange, LLC DIP Exchange, LLC 93 Sidney Phillips Drive (West side of Sidney Phillips Drive,
More informationCommercial Development Standards. City of Homestead
Commercial Development Standards City of Homestead Presentation Outline Introductions Purpose and Intent Objectives Administrative Process Established Districts Design Standards Purpose and Intent Supplement
More informationHistoric Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2012 Filing Date: July 25, 2012 Case No.: 2012.0361A Project Address: () Landmark: No. 84 San Francisco War Memorial Complex, Civic
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationPLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF LONG RANGE PLANNING
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL MEMO DATE: August 13, 2008 TO: FROM: SunPAC Members Derek Johnson, Deputy Director Shaunn Mendrin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SunPAC Meeting #12 SunPAC members,
More informationCHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTING THE 2030 PLAN
CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTING THE 2030 PLAN GENERAL Each decision by the County Commissioners and recommendation made by the Planning Commission has the potential to contribute to or take away from the implementation
More informationMayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services
CITY COMMISSION BRIEFING & Planning Board Report For Meeting Scheduled for January 6, 2011 Chickie Hair Salon Site Plan/Architectural Review Downtown Overlay District/Cottage Row Area Site Plan Consent
More informationPLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017
PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION Mobile Christian School 5900 Cottage Hill Road (North side of Cottage Hill Road, 230 ± West of Freemont Drive
More informationBuilding a Vision for the Future: Architectural Patterns of Palm Beach
Palm Beach/Florida Building a Vision for the Future: Architectural Patterns of Palm Beach Prepared by URBAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES Prepared for The Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach December 1998 Introduction
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission
++ City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 08, 2018 Staff: Subject: Chris Juram, Planning Technician SS12-17 Miramar Homebuilders, R-20 Zoning: Request
More informationFDOT D4 Complete Streets
FDOT D4 Complete Streets Context Sensitive Solutions Directs that complete street solutions will complement the context of the community. Collaborative approach to decision making, project development,
More information