Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Similar documents
BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Route 110 Alternatives Analysis

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Ann Arbor Intermodal Station Environmental Review

Seattle Transit Master Plan

TOD 203 CORRIDOR PLANNING and TOD

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

METRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting. August 23, 2018

A community driven catalyst for an equitable, healthy, (economically viable and environmentally) sustainable corridor

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Southeast Extension to RidgeGate Parkway Scoping Booklet

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Route 1 Corridor Study

Central Corridor Light Rail Transit. Environmental Assessment Three Infill Stations. Western, Victoria, and Hamline

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

D2 Subway Project Development. Public Meeting September 12, 2018

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo

CITY S GOALS DRIVE MODE CHOICE IN WINSTON-SALEM, NC

Chapter 1: Introduction

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

Railyard Enterprise Project Steering Committee Meeting #4

COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE. March 28, 2012

RECOMMENDED GOALS, CONCEPTS, GUIDELINES PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

Introduction and Overview

Office of Greenways & Trails Providing Statewide Leadership and Coordination. Southeast Greenways and Trails Summit October 1-3, 2017

The Atlanta BeltLine. Quarterly Briefing March @atlantabeltline. Reynoldstown Senior Affordable Housing

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

City of Meriden Harbor Brook Flood Control Project Overview

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. MTA Board Meeting May 6, 2014

Point A Point B Point C Point D. City of Hapeville Public Meeting July 25, 2017

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

D2 Subway Project Development. Interagency Meeting July 27, 2018

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Transit Implementation Strategy Westside Study Group Meeting

City of Brookfield 2035 Comprehensive Plan. DRAFT #2 October 6, 2009

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

PD&E STUDY SR 9/I-95 FROM SOUTH OF SR 870/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD TO NORTH OF CYPRESS CREEK ROAD FM # ETDM 14222

Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW Public Meeting No. 1 Project Overview

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING/OPEN HOUSE October 15, 2008

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Phase 2 Eden Landing Ecological Reserve Scoping Meeting for EIS/EIR. June 30, 2016

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

Murphy Crossing Site Redevelopment Community Engagement Meeting September 19, 2016

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

Northwest LRT Downtown to. Northwest Edmonton Study. Public Workshops

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

I-70 Corridor Enhancement Plan

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Silverdale Regional Center

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

Transcription:

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study Scoping Meeting August 2008

What Will We Be Discussing Today? Study Overview - How Did We Get Here? - What Is the Study About? - Who Is Involved? - Where Is the Study Area? - Why Is the Project Needed? Study Process - Previous Related Studies - What Is NEPA? - What Is Scoping? - Schedule - Issues to be Addressed in the EIS Project Goals and Objectives Public Involvement Slide 2 of 25

How Did We Get Here? Slide 3 of 25

What Is the Study About? The Atlanta BeltLine: - Proposed new rail transit and bicycle/pedestrian trails system - Multi-use transportation corridor - 22-mile loop around Downtown/Midtown - Connect communities and green space - Provide links between existing and planned development, recreation, and existing transportation - Convert unused/underused rail ROWs - Promote sustainable and efficient use of urban land - Support transit-oriented, mixed-use development and redevelopment Slide 4 of 25

Who Is Involved? Federal Transit Administration (lead federal agency) Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA, project sponsor) Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. (project sponsor) Local, state, and federal agencies You! Slide 5 of 25

Study Outcomes Informed Decision Making: Updated purpose and need, goals and objectives, evaluation measures Rail mode (Modern Streetcar, Light Rail Transit) Basic design concept for transit and trails Conceptual facility locations Right-of-way needs for preservation Broad, system-level impacts Slide 6 of 25

Where Is the Study Area? Slide 7 of 25

Why Is the Project Needed? Purpose of Atlanta BeltLine: - Improve local and regional mobility - Address transit and trail accessibility - Address transit and trail connectivity (especially with the existing MARTA system) - Support the City of Atlanta s redevelopment, recreational, and green space plans - Support City of Atlanta s and regional growth management strategies Need for Improvements: - Address the effects of population and employment growth and planned development on transportation system - Provide critical links between Atlanta s existing and planned recreational opportunities Slide 8 of 25

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Study Process Slide 9 of 25

Previous Related Studies Trails (City of Atlanta): - Atlanta BeltLine Redevelopment Plan (2005) and BeltLine Emerald Necklace Study (2004) identified future locations for parks and multi-use trails. - Cultural Ring Loop and BeltLine Transit Greenway concepts influenced the transit element of this study Transit (MARTA): - Atlanta BeltLine Alternatives Analysis (2007) included 10 build alternatives - MARTA Board of Directors identified a preferred alternative based on a number of performance criteria Slide 10 of 25

Study Process Project Purpose and Need Define Evaluation Criteria Project Goals / Objectives Environmental Review Results FTA New Starts Criteria Public / Agency Comment No-Build Alternative (Existing & Committed Projects only) Alternative Analysis Results (LPA) Alignment Stations 2 Technologies Refinement of LPA Physical Constraints by Technology Station Spacing by Technology Minimize Potential for Impacts Maximize Potential for Benefits Refinement of Trail Concepts Connection Points Visual/Aesthetic Considerations Accessibility Build Streetcar/Trails Alignment General Station Locations Facilities General Trails Concept Connectivity Build LRT/Trails Alignment General Station Locations Facilities General Trails Concept Connectivity Conceptual Engineering of Alternatives Right-of-way limits Preliminary Costs Evaluation of Alternatives Meets Project Purpose and Need Public/Agency Review Recommended Alternative Mode Trails Location General Alignment PROJECT INITIATION PROJECT SCOPING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/IMPACT ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION Slide 11 of 25

Evaluation Framework Each of the transit and trails alternatives will be evaluated based on the criteria below, and how well they meet the goals and objectives of the project : - Mobility - Accessibility and connectivity -Equity - Cost-effectiveness and efficiency -Travel time - Pedestrian and bicycle compatibility - Support of city initiatives - Land use and economic development - Community fit - Environmental quality - Public and agency comment Slide 12 of 25

What is NEPA? The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires: - Consideration of environmental issues during the decision-making process for major federal actions that might have a significant effect on the environment - Alternatives analysis - Agency coordination - Public involvement - Mitigation of significant impacts Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - Notice of Intent (NOI) - Scoping process - Draft EIS - Public comment -Final EIS - Record of Decision Slide 13 of 25

What Is Scoping? A federally mandated process for identifying issues related to the project An opportunity for the cooperating and participating agencies and the public to comment on the purpose and need and the range of alternatives The Scoping Process is intended to: - Inform agencies and public about the project - Identify opportunities for agency and public input - Refine the Purpose and Need statement, goals and objectives, and evaluation measures - Provide Scoping and NEPA process schedules Slide 14 of 25

Schedule Slide 15 of 25

Issues to be Addressed in the Tier 1 EIS Slide 16 of 25

Section 106 Scoping also provides an opportunity to identify areas of potential concern or other important resources, such as cultural resources Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires agencies to take into account their actions on significant cultural resources Looking for your input to compile a comprehensive picture of history along the BeltLine Slide 17 of 25

Goal 1: Intermodal Connectivity Goal 1: Contribute to an integrated, regional, multi-modal transportation network that promotes seamless intermodal connectivity; increases community access to the existing transit and trails network; and improves reliability for personal travel. Objectives: 1) Increase access to the existing regional transit and trails system 2) Increase transit ridership and transit-mode split 3) Improve transit and trails connections to the existing MARTA rail and bus network 4) Minimize travel times to points accessible from the MARTA rail and bus network 5) Improve accessibility and connectivity among existing neighborhoods and to major destinations and employment centers 6) Increase transit options for transit-dependent and low-income populations Slide 18 of 25

Goal 2: Support Development Initiatives Goal 2: Support local and regional land-use development initiatives and fulfill demands for emerging transit-supportive land uses. Objectives: 1) Support redevelopment and revitalization efforts in the BeltLine Tax Allocation District 2) Support the City of Atlanta s and other regional and local economic development initiatives 3) Support the redevelopment of brownfield sites for transit-oriented development 4) Encourage dense, mixed-use, urban development Slide 19 of 25

Goal 3: Cost-Effective/Efficient Investment Goal 3: Provide a cost-effective and efficient transportation investment. Objectives: 1) Minimize capital and operating costs 2) Provide for the long-term expansion of the future transit and trails system 3) Support recent and planned transit infrastructure investments 4) Maximize operating efficiency and costeffectiveness Slide 20 of 25

Goal 4: Bicycle/Pedestrian Environment Goal 4: Provide a bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly environment. Objectives: 1) Provide transit and trail facilities that fully accommodate bicycle and pedestrian transit modes with direct links to employment and retail centers, recreational facilities, and residential areas 2) Develop transit and trail facilities that encourage a safe and efficient bicycle and pedestrian collector system 3) Provide pedestrian and bike accessibility to transit and trails Slide 21 of 25

Goal 5: Connectivity Goal 5: Provide connectivity between communities and existing and planned recreational opportunities through an expansive trails network. Objectives: 1) Provide efficient transit and trail connections between regional and local parks and recreational facilities in the study area 2) Provide transit and trail access to parks, green spaces, and community facilities 3) Support existing and planned park programming, including event venues, through access to transit and trail facilities 4) Integrate green space opportunities into transit and trail facilities 5) Provide trail and transit connectivity to schools Slide 22 of 25

Goal 6: Protecting the Environment Goal 6: Minimize adverse impacts to the natural environment and foster positive environmental impacts. Objectives: 1) Provide a transit and trails network that offers a balance between transportation needs and environmental quality 2) Develop viable transportation alternatives to the use of single-occupant vehicles to maintain or improve air quality in the region 3) Minimize adverse impacts to the natural environment 4) Minimize adverse impacts to the built environment including historic and cultural resources 5) Minimize adverse aesthetic impacts Slide 23 of 25

Public Involvement Plan Purpose: Engage the public Inform the public Build public support for the BeltLine Project Components: - Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) - Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) - BeltLine Study Groups - Target audience briefings - Progress presentations - Website, hotline, newsletters, technical findings updates, public comment forms, and other communications tools Contact information: Hotline: 404-524-2070 E-mail: dwa_beltlinestudy@bellsouth.net Website: www.itsmarta.com/newsroom/beltline.html Slide 24 of 25

Next Steps Complete Scoping process Comments due September 22 Public hearing on Tier 1 Draft EIS (Fall 2009) Final EIS publication (Spring 2010) Ongoing public involvement: - Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) - Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) - BeltLine Study Groups - Target audience briefings - Progress presentations - Website, hotline, newsletters, technical findings updates, public comment forms, and other communications tools Contact information: Hotline: 404-524-2070 E-mail: dwa_beltlinestudy@bellsouth.net Website: www.itsmarta.com/newsroom/beltline.html Slide 25 of 25