Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities of the Piscataqua River Estuary

Similar documents
Eelgrass Distribution in the Great Bay Estuary and Piscataqua River for 2013

Assessment of Key Municipal Planning Regulations for. Derek Sowers Conservation Program Manager Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership

LAMPREY RIVER SUBWATERSHED

Developing 2015 High-Resolution Impervious Cover Estimates for the 52 Towns in the Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership: Final Report

Piscataqua Region Environmental Planning Assessment

River Road New Castle Marsh Restoration Recommendations

Shoreland Buffer Module for GRANIT Data Mapper

How much of the Piscataqua Region watershed is currently covered by impervious surfaces and how has it changed over time?

St. Croix County Shoreland Overlay Zoning Districts. Public Hearing Community Development Committee December 19, 2013

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer

Review of Northwood s Stormwater Management Regulations Northwood, New Hampshire

Freshwater Wetlands Inventory Outreach Activities for the Freshwater Wetland Mitigation Inventory of Nineteen Coastal Communities Report

SECTION 1 CLEARING /GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION:

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Protecting Scenic Views

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

Town of New Durham Zoning & Land Use Odinance

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Benchmark Nonpoint Source Management Approaches In Other States

Weston s Wetlands, Stormwater, & Open Space

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

BOROUGH OF FENWICK PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 2017 PLAN OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

2018 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

495/MetroWest Development Compact Plan Citizen Planner Training Collaborative Conference. March 17, 2012

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

Best Practices Appendix: Waterfront Communities

Hazard Mitigation Planning. Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions Workshop Edison, New Jersey October 20, 2012

Recent Updates as of July 7, 2016

Tackling Difficult SEQR Topics

Landowner's Guide to the Lower St. Croix Riverway. Protect. Restore. Celebrate. stcroixriverassociation.org

CHAPTER 3 REGULATED LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Weston Conservation Commission

Landscaping by the Water s Edge

Chapter Purpose and Intent. 7.2 Applicability. 7.3 General Provisions RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE

Building Ecological Solutions to Coastal Community Hazards: Guidance and NJ Coastal Community Assistance

Buffer Zone (BZ) Stream Protection. The width and plant composition of a buffer zone will determine its effectiveness.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT. Last amended December 6, 2016 as part of the 2016 EAR

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

MORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT

Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials. Linking Land Use to Water Quality. Partnership for Environmental Technology Education

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Meta-Analysis of Project Effectiveness: Learning at the Regional Scale

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Section H: Waterfront

Northern Branch Corridor DEIS December 2011

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013

COMMUNITY RESILIENCE IN COASTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE

Analysis of Environs of Clinton Park located at 901 W 5 th Street

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Landscaping at the Water s Edge: An Ecological Approach

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Innovative Land Use Techniques

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

MUNICIPAL RESILIENCE PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

NEW CASTLE COUNTY S ZONING DISTRICTS

Westport Master Plan. Town of Westport. Master Plan Master Plan Update Committee. Westport, Massachusetts

DRIVEWAY REGULATIONS

7 May 9, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: COASTAL ENTERPRISES, LLC

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

11: Good Design - Boor Site

Chapter 8: Land Use. Key Issues. Introduction. Stakeholders. Survey Results. Purpose

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Town of Rico Three Mile Plan for Annexation

Arlington County Retail Plan

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Town of Huntsville Official Plan Section 8 Waterfront Policies Page 71

BRAMPTON FLOWERTOWN SECONDARY PLAN Area 6

WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT REFERENCE MANUAL

5. Would the proposed project require modifications to the existing regulations?

Climate Smart Communities Green Infrastructure Case Studies

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Appendix to Amicus Curiae Brief: Selected Provisions of the South Carolina Beachfront Management Act

Map Development 5/15/2012. New Virginia Modeling Tools

4.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING EXISTING CONDITIONS REGULATORY BACKGROUND LAND USES IN THE PLAN AREA SURROUNDING LAND USES

Working Group Meeting

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

STORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects

Importance of Master Planning Marcy Colclough

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

Transcription:

University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository PREP Reports & Publications Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) 5-2010 Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities of the Piscataqua River Estuary Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/prep Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission, "Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities of the Piscataqua River Estuary" (2010). PREP Reports & Publications. 37. https://scholars.unh.edu/prep/37 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in PREP Reports & Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact nicole.hentz@unh.edu.

Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities of the Piscataqua River Estuary This report is available at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository: https://scholars.unh.edu/prep/37

Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities Piscataqua River Estuary May 2010

SHORELAND PROTECTION IN MAINE COMMUNITIES OF THE PISCATAQUA RIVER ESTUARY The Management Plan for the Piscataqua River Estuary Program s (PREP) includes several action plans to improve municipal regulatory protections for stream and wetland buffers. This project objective was to identify and prioritize appropriate shoreland areas for protection within Maine towns that are within the PREP region, and inform municipalities and land trusts about these areas, and the importance for protecting them. Below is an overview of the process, analysis and policy considerations. PROCESS The first step in the process was to map existing development within the shoreland zones that are within the PREP area. Aerial photography or existing data sources (Sanford and York) were used to map the location of existing development. Shoreland zones were mapped for each of the towns within the PREP region. Recognizing that all towns are subject to Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Chapter 1000 Shoreland Zoning Guidelines, each town has their own unique shoreland zones and shoreland zone buffers. In order to compile a regional shoreland zoning map, the unique zones within each town were grouped into three broader categories set forth in the MDEP Chapter 1000 Guidelines: Stream Protection, Resource Protection, and Limited Residential (see Map 1). The next step in the process was to create a developable lands map to show all land not constrained by physical limitations or conserved land with development restrictions (see Developable Lands Map). Developable lands include all lands that are not in areas where development is restricted by any of the following constraints (see Map 2): Existing development 100-year floodplains Wetlands Rivers Ponds Streams Steep slopes Conservation restrictions Publicly owned lands. The build-out model, using ArcGIS in conjunction with CommunityViz software, assumed a 2- acre minimum lot size for each potential future dwelling unit. Additionally, future development was only modeled on developable land within the Limited Residential shoreland zone since that is the only shoreland zone where additional development is likely to occur (development within

Map 1

Map 2

the Stream Protection and Resource Protection zones is allowed in some towns, but only as a special exception or an approved variance). Town Acton Berwick Eliot Kittery Lebanon North Berwick Sanford South Berwick Wells York Limited Residential Conditional Use Minor Site Plan ANALYSIS An analysis of the developable lands layer and the build-out model results reveals that there is considerable developable potential within the shoreland zone in the towns of Kittery, Eliot, South Berwick, Berwick, and Lebanon (see Map 3). The developable areas include the western borders of these towns which front along the Salmon Falls River, and within significant areas of internal wetlands, streams, and waterbodies. Town Potential Additional Residential Units Within Limited Residential Shoreland Zone Potential Additional Residential Units Within Limited Residential Shoreland Zone that is also within PREP Conservation Focus Areas Acton 10 6 Berwick 314 142 Eliot 158 1 Kittery 314 47 Lebanon 215 83 North Berwick 12 1 Sanford 55 24 South Berwick 248 90 York 40 37 Wells 33 25 Total 1,399 456

Map 3

When looking at the impact of future development within the shoreland zones that are within the PREP Conservation Focus Areas, Kittery, South Berwick, Lebanon, and York all have areas that are especially vulnerable to future development (see Map 4). POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Towns may want to consider strengthening their shoreland zone regulations by adopting standards that go beyond MDEP minimum guidelines to further protect resources, particularly those areas that are within the shoreland zone and are within the PREP Conservation Focus Areas. Different considerations could include increasing setback distances, increasing lot sizes and road and/or shoreline frontage requirements. Towns could also consider increasing their oversight of development within the Limited Residential zone as they differ from one town to another (see table below) Town Acton Berwick Eliot Kittery Lebanon North Berwick Sanford South Berwick York Wells Limited Residential Building Permit Requirement Conditional Use Minor Site Plan Additionally, towns could provide educational opportunities, working with homeowners associations and land trusts, and creating awareness of threats to natural resources (i.e., erosion, environmental hazards, septic discharges, etc.)

Map 4