CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Similar documents
12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:

VALLEY COUNTY MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ROAD DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

RRW Stonebrook, LLC Tentative Map Findings

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

Ref: March 21, Ms. Jody Kablack Director of Planning and Community Development Town of Sudbury 278 Old Sudbury Road Sudbury, MA 01776

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC

ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR. Transmitted herewith, is the City Engineer's report dated September 28, 2006 for Council review and approval of:

Request Alternative Compliance (Commercial Parking Lot in Restricted Area) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Ashby Moss

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Joint Planning and Zoning Meeting

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

City of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, RELATING TO STREET REQUIRE:MENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS

4.11 TRAFFIC Existing Conditions Existing Project Site. Existing Street System

Application for Site Plan Review

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

3. Additional driveways may be permitted where determined by the Planning Commission to adequately accommodate traffic or ensure public safety.

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 3.

that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11,

ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units:

2. What is required if I want to put some patio/bistro tables and chairs on the sidewalk and remove them at the end of each day?

MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MDNS) WAC

City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering staff report - dated October 14, 2009 and the Hearing Examiner Report signed October 21, 2009.

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL

OFFICE CONSOLIDATION SECONDARY PLAN AREA 22 THE BRAMALEA SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SECONDARY PLAN

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: , ,

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Request: The subject application is for approval of a gymnasium addition to an existing private school and church.

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: , ,

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Article 7.05 Manufactured Home Park Districts

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

THE NE QUADRANT LAND USE PLAN

SPECIFIC DESIGN PLAN

1173 W. University Dr. Request to construct a new Alumni Center.

2 January 9, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9

8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

Camden County Development Regulations. Updated February 2017

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

Errata 1 Landmark Apartments Project Final Environmental Impact Report

Site Plan Review Residential Accessory Building

NORTH, NORTH REDWOOD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY

#8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

DRIVEWAY LOCATION APPROVAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION REPORT - CONCEPT/USE ON REVIEW

The transportation system in a community is an

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL

The Town Board of the Town of Vienna, County of Dane, State of Wisconsin, does ordain and adopt as follows.

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property

CITY OF WESTERVILLE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. BASSEM BITAR / (614) /

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

3 November 10, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER :

CHRISTMAS TREE LOT INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGULATORY IMPEDIMENT GAP ANALYSIS TOOL

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN. APPLICANT: Cedar Grove Hospitality, LLC HEARING DATE: December 18, 2014

Public Information Centre #1

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

I-75 Overpass Study Summary

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0594 APPLICANT: Racetrack Petroleum, Inc.

2 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

M E M O R A N D U M. Chair and Members of North West Planning Advisory Committee

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

Section 4.11 Traffic and Transportation 4.11 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE 20000 Prairie St. DOT Case No. 41443 Date: November 5, 2014 To: R. Nicolas Brown, Associate Zoning Administrator Department of City Planning From: Subject: Sergio D. Valdez, Transportation Engineer Department of Transportation TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MGA CHATSWORTH MIXED-USE PROJECT AT 20000 PRAIRIE STREET The Department of Transportation (DOT) has completed the traffic assessment for the proposed MGA Chatsworth Mixed-Use, at the intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Prairie Street, in the community of Chatsworth. This traffic assessment is based on a professional traffic impact study of the proposed project, dated January 2014, as prepared by Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. In preparation of this assessment, DOT conducted a careful review of this traffic study s pertinent assumptions, analyses and conclusions, and conducted independent field studies and research to validate the data contained therein. DOT has determined that the traffic study, as revised below, adequately describes all projected transportation impacts associated with the proposed development that fall within the City of Los Angeles jurisdiction to review. DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS The proposed project consists of a Corporate Headquarters site including 700 apartments, 11,000 square feet of commercial retail space, 3,000 square feet of restaurant space, 43,000 square feet of office space and 212,815 square feet of light industrial uses (general office rates were used in the study to be conservative). This site is presently undeveloped. The proposed project will generate 8,157 new daily trips, 788 new a.m. peak hour trips and 860 new p.m. peak hour trips, as shown in Table 1 below. The trip generation estimates are based on formulas published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. Table 1: : Trip Generation Estimates Daily a.m. Peak Trips p.m. Peak Trips Land Use Description Size Unit Trips In Out Total In Out Total MGA Headquarters + offices 255,815 square foot 2,822 351 48 399 60 321 381 Retail space 11,000 square foot 376 4 2 6 10 11 21 Restaurant 3,000 square foot 305 15 11 26 14 10 24 Apartments 700 dwelling unit 4,655 71 286 357 282 152 434 Totals 8,158 441 347 788 366 494 860

R. Nicolas Brown 2 November 5, 2014 The traffic study was revised by recalculating the existing and projected volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios and levels of service (LOS) at the study intersections after making the following change: Pursuant to the pending implementation of the 2010 Master Bike Plan, the lane configurations of all Major Highway approaches in the future scenario that currently contain two through lanes and a shared through-right lane were changed to two through lanes and a right-turn only lane, due to the high probability that the Bike Plan will cause a through lane to be removed in both directions. DOT s policy on significant transportation impact threshold, listed in Table 2 below, is also referenced in the traffic study on page 21. Table 2: Significant Transportation Thresholds Level of Service (LOS) ed Volume to Capacity Ratio (v c), including -Related Increase in v c C between 0.701 and 0.800 0.040 D between 0.801 and 0.900 0.020 E and F 0.901 0.010 The traffic study reviewed eleven intersections for traffic impacts. DOT conducted an independent Critical Movement Analysis of the intersections contained in the study, and has concluded that the proposed project will produce a significant transportation impact at five of the studied intersections. Three of the impacted intersections can be mitigated to a less-thansignificant level through the implementation of mitigation measures as described below. The remaining two intersections would have significant and unavoidable impacts. These findings are summarized in Tables 3 through 5, which show the existing, projected, and project-related volume-to-capacity ratios and levels of service at the study intersections. The Department of Transportation recommends that the following Requirements be adopted as conditions of project approval in order to mitigate the project s traffic impacts to the greatest extent possible: PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. Mitigation Measure easures 1. Intersection improvements a. The intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Parthenia Street will be mitigated to a less-than-significant level by reconfiguring the westbound approach to include a right turn only lane. To accommodate this improvement, existing signal equipment shall be modified and/or upgraded as necessary. b. The intersection of Corbin Avenue and Plummer Street will be partially mitigated by reconfiguring the southbound approach to include a right turn only lane. To accommodate this improvement, existing signal equipment shall be modified and/or upgraded as necessary.

R. Nicolas Brown 3 November 5, 2014 These measures shall be guaranteed through the B-permit process of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) before the issuance of any building permit for this project, and shall be completed to the satisfaction of DOT and BOE prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. 2. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program The impacted intersections will be mitigated, in part or in full, through the implementation of a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program. a. The Applicant shall prepare a TDM plan that will encourage the use of rideshare/carpools, public transportation and privately operated bus shuttle services. This plan shall be submitted to DOT for approval annually. The applicant shall submit this plan to the Northridge and Chatsworth Neighborhood Councils for a 30-day review and comment period prior to submitting the plan along with any comments received during the review period to DOT. b. The Applicant shall hire a licensed traffic engineer as a consultant on a semiannual basis to conduct vehicle trip counts at the project site and submit a Compliance Report to DOT with the data collected assuring that the project is in compliance with the vehicle trip cap. The trip cap shall be set to the total with mitigation project-related trips listed in the worksheets in the study. A semiannual Compliance Report shall be submitted before the end of the months of December and June. c. In the event that the Applicant is not in compliance with the vehicle trip cap for two consecutive reporting periods, the Applicant shall be required to pay a $1,000 penalty to the City of Los Angeles for each a.m. or p.m. vehicular trip the site generates in excess of the cap. d. If the Applicant is in compliance for five consecutive years the Applicant shall no longer be required to submit the vehicle trip cap reports to DOT. B. Highway Dedications and Improvements ments Pursuant to the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.37A (Highway Dedications and Improvements), an investigation of existing street dimensions adjacent to the project was conducted. In response to this investigation, DOT has the following comments: 1. Winnetka Avenue is a designated Class II Major Highway in the Streets and Highways Element of the City s General Plan, and currently consists of a 50-foot half right-of-way including a 40-foot half roadway and existing curb, gutter and sidewalk along project frontage. Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering (BOE) Standard Plan S 470 0 dictates the standard cross section of a Class II Major Highway to have a 52-foot half right-of-way containing a 40-foot half-roadway. However, the project site currently provides an easement for the Winnetka Channel which runs along the westerly edge of the site and abuts Winnetka Avenue. Therefore, DOT has no recommendation of specific improvements to this street required by the applicant in conjunction with this project.

R. Nicolas Brown 4 November 5, 2014 2. Prairie Street is a designated Collector Street in the General Plan, and currently consists of a 32-foot half right-of-way including a 22-foot half roadway and existing curb, gutter and sidewalk along project frontage. BOE Standard Plan S 470 0 dictates that the standard cross section of a Collector Street to have a 32-foot half right-of-way containing a 22-foot half roadway. The existing right-of-way and roadway match the Standard Street Dimensions specified in the aforementioned standard. Therefore, DOT has no recommendation of specific improvements to this street required by the applicant in conjunction with this project. The applicant should contact the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to determine the exact dedication and widening standards that are applicable, and to ensure full compliance with these requirements along with any other required improvements specified by the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and city ordinances. Required improvements within existing or designated roadways shall be guaranteed through the B-permit process of BOE before the issuance of any building permit for this project, and shall be completed to the satisfaction of DOT and BOE prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. C. Site Access and Internal Circulation This determination does not constitute final DOT approval of the project s driveways, internal circulation, and parking scheme per LAMC Section 12.21. A preliminary parking and driveway plan was submitted to DOT with the traffic study. After reviewing this preliminary plan, DOT has the following comments. The applicant should carefully review these comments to ensure that final site access plans conform to DOT s criteria for driveway designs as published in DOT Manual of Policies and Procedures, Section 321: 1. The applicant should contact the DOT West Valley District office to determine the feasibility of constructing a signalized driveway for the project. Traffic signal construction, if deemed feasible, shall be guaranteed through the B-permit process of BOE before the issuance of any building permit for this project, and shall be completed to the satisfaction of DOT and BOE prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. 2. The parking layout plan shall include the adjacent roadway curbs and show all driveways as well as any structure or off-site driveway within 25 feet of a project driveway. Driveways should be designed pursuant to BOE Standard Plan S-440-3, with the vehicular-accessible width W shown on the plan as 30 feet for two-way access or 16 feet for one-way access. Note that the W dimension is less than that of the total curb cut, as it excludes the side slopes. 3. To avoid an influx of vehicles impinging on the public right-of-way, a minimum 60-foot queuing reservoir between the future property line and the first parking stall shall be required at all ingress driveways along Winnetka Avenue. 4. To provide internal circulation, all parking areas shall be contiguous and accessible from all other similarly designated parking areas without requiring the use of any public street.

R. Nicolas Brown 5 November 5, 2014 DOT CLEARANCE GUIDELINES Final DOT approval is normally required prior to the issuance of any associated building permits. Approval is given when DOT receives an acceptable site and access plan, verification that all enumerated conditions of approval are satisfied, guaranteed or not applicable, and payment of all applicable application fees. For the fastest possible final review and approval process, plans should be submitted to DOT Valley Development Review, 6262 Van Nuys Blvd., Suite 320, Van Nuys 91401, prior to plan check submission to the Department of Building and Safety. Pursuant to City Ordinance 180542, effective March 27, 2009, application fees are required for all DOT-related condition clearances and permit issuance activities for private development projects within the city, and must be received by DOT prior to the issuance of any approval, clearance or sign-off. A copy of this ordinance is available upon request. If you have any questions, you may contact me or Ken Aitchison of my staff at 818-374-4692. c: Twelfth Council District Ken Firoozmand, DOT West Valley District Quyen Phan, BOE Land Development Group Ali Nahass, BOE Valley District Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Sky Tech Management & Construction

R. Nicolas Brown 6 November 5, 2014 Table 3: Volume to Capacity Ratios (v c) ( ) and Levels of Service (LOS) MGA Chatsworth Mixed-Use, 20000 Prairie St. Intersection Peak Hour Existing conditions Existing + Future, no project Future + v c LOS v c LOS v c v c LOS v c LOS v c Mason Av & AM 0.697 B 0.711 C 0.014 0.807 D 0.822 D 0.015 Plummer St PM 0.659 B 0.675 B 0.016 0.791 C 0.807 D 0.016 Winnetka Av & AM 0.539 A 0.594 A 0.055 0.612 B 0.667 B 0.055 Lassen St PM 0.478 A 0.521 A 0.043 0.551 A 0.595 A 0.044 Winnetka Av & AM 0.547 A 0.602 B 0.055 0.599 A 0.647 B 0.048 Plummer St PM 0.398 A 0.439 A 0.041 0.546 A 0.497 A 0.041 Winnetka Av & AM 0.325 A 0.383 A 0.058 0.384 A 0.443 A 0.059 Prairie St PM 0.370 A 0.479 A 0.109 0.427 A 0.537 A 0.110 Winnetka Av & AM 0.629 B 0.684 B 0.055 0.830 D 0.880 D 0.050* Nordhoff St PM 0.556 A 0.592 A 0.036 0.750 C 0.786 C 0.036 Winnetka Av & AM 0.713 C 0.753 C 0.040* 0.816 D 0.856 D 0.040* Parthenia St PM 0.677 B 0.700 B 0.023 0.777 C 0.799 C 0.022 Winnetka Av & AM 0.687 B 0.705 C 0.018 0.807 D 0.829 D 0.022* Roscoe Bl PM 0.768 C 0.785 C 0.017 0.859 D 0.877 D 0.018 Corbin Av & AM 0.786 C 0.820 D 0.034* 0.885 D 0.920 E 0.035* Plummer St PM 0.731 C 0.768 C 0.037 0.815 D 0.852 D 0.037* Corbin Av & AM 0.585 A 0.674 B 0.089 0.667 B 0.757 C 0.090* Prairie St PM 0.461 A 0.550 A 0.089 0.527 A 0.616 B 0.089 Corbin Av & AM 0.337 A 0.352 A 0.015 0.387 A 0.402 A 0.015 Nordhoff Pl PM 0.479 A 0.489 A 0.011 0.539 A 0.549 A 0.010 Corbin Av & AM 0.621 B 0.631 A 0.010 0.802 D 0.814 D 0.012 Nordhoff St / Way PM 0.595 A 0.607 B 0.012 0.727 C 0.742 C 0.015 * Denotes significant impact

R. Nicolas Brown 7 November 5, 2014 Table 4: Existing + + Mitigation Summary ed Intersection Peak Hour Existing conditions Existing + Existing + + Mitigation Final v c LOS v c LOS v c v c LOS v c Winnetka Av & AM 0.713 C 0.753 C 0.040* 0.741 C 0.028 Parthenia St PM 0.677 B 0.700 B 0.023 0.689 B 0.012 Corbin Av & AM 0.786 C 0.820 D 0.034* 0.731 C 0.055 Plummer St PM 0.731 C 0.768 C 0.037 0.765 C 0.034 * Denotes significant impact Table 5: Future + + Mitigation Summary ed Intersection Peak Hour Future conditions Future + Future + + Mitigation Final v c LOS v c LOS v c v c LOS v c Winnetka Av & AM 0.830 D 0.880 D 0.050* 0.845 D 0.015 Nordhoff St PM 0.750 C 0.786 C 0.036 0.773 C 0.023 Winnetka Av & AM 0.816 D 0.856 D 0.040* 0.780 C 0.036 Parthenia St PM 0.777 C 0.799 C 0.022 0.788 C 0.011 Winnetka Av & AM 0.807 D 0.829 D 0.022* 0.817 D 0.010 Roscoe Bl PM 0.859 D 0.877 D 0.018 0.865 D 0.006 Corbin Av & AM 0.885 D 0.920 E 0.035* 0.821 D 0.064 Plummer St PM 0.815 D 0.852 D 0.037* 0.849 D 0.034** Corbin Av & AM 0.667 B 0.757 C 0.090* 0.729 C 0.062** Prairie St PM 0.527 A 0.616 B 0.089 0.611 B 0.084 * Denotes significant impact ** Denotes significant and unavoidable impact following implantation of mitigation measures