las vegas wash coordination committee

Similar documents
Ecological Restoration at the Las Vegas Springs Preserve. Von K. Winkel, Ph.D.

Melissa McMaster Restoration Coordinator

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Planting Guide for Buffers

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Coyote Gulch Honor Award and Land Stewardship Designation Valerian LLC. Environmental Restoration and Reclamation

WETLAND SOD u Bare Root Wetland Plants u Deep Rooted Willows u Coir Logs u Native Trees & Shrubs u Habitat Islands u Custom Growing

Trestles Wetlands Natural Preserve Plant Communities. Plant Community Site Map from Feldmeth (1987):

Balancing Conservation and Development on the Jordan River

Tentatively Selected Plan within Harlem River, East River and Western Long Island Sound Planning Region. First Level Costs. Federal Non-Federal Total

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

Lake Ogallala Bathometric Project

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Section General Tree Preservation Requirements for New Nonresidential and Residential Development

SITE INTRODUCTIONS AND OVERVIEW

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program June 18, 2018 Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative Update

Presentation to Parks and Open Space Advisory. Committee September 22, 2016

Grave Creek Riparian Revegetation 2011 Implementation Report

Hunts Point Landing, Bronx, New York

PICTURE CANYON Planning Riparian-Wetland Refugia in an Urban Setting

I611. Swanson North Precinct

Towne Park Estates Subdivision Phase II

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Lees Ferry 10 Acre Riparian Revegetation Project

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Juneau Watershed Partnership

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

Final Report and Maintenance Requirements. Native Plant Screening for the New Wildlife Bridge at Catalina Catholic Church

Response to Comments (July 28, 2010 Oregon City Determination of Application Completeness Memo)

Post Construction BMPs

Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation November 2017

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Banking on Natural Fibers Products made from coir and jute play a key role in stabilizing a restored stream for a commercial stream mitigation bank.

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

Call for Artists for: Design and Construction of Environmental Art Activation Story Mill Community Park, Bozeman, MT

ALL SECURE SELF STORAGE SEPA APPEAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

Philbrook Avenue Wetlands and Stream Riparian Restoration Project Planting Plan 2009 REVISED AUGUST 24, 2009

Limpia Creek Duck Pond. 25 acres, Jeff Davis County

Hidden Pointe Landscape Master Plan. June, archi terra

Conservation Plan. I. Property Information. II. Objectives. Natural Resource Objectives. Sustainability in Practice (SIP) Certified

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation in ND. Guy Welch ND Public Service Commission

Is a Riparian Restoration Still Viable After 100-year Storm Events Alter the Original Design?

Wisconsin NRCS Direct Volume Method Bank Recession Rate Categorizations

EPA Surface Water Enhancement, Restoration & Protection (SWERP)

15. Wetlands Chapter Overview Introduction

Merkel & Associates, Inc Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA Tel: 858/ Fax: 858/

Rockwell Collins Green Communities Grant Application

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR POST CONSTRUCTION MEASURES

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

Dolores River Restoration Partnership. A Collaborative Approach to River Restoration and the Development of a New Generation of Land Stewards

Restoration of Riparian Buffer at the Former Smelt Hill Dam Site, Falmouth, Maine

C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

Property. Line. Fence. Plantings. Vegetated Buttress. With Sun Tolerant. Vegetated Terrace. Tolerant Plantings Existing

Commercial Launch Site Addendum to Wetland Mitigation Plan. Revision 2. April 25, SpaceX Proprietary

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Local Regulations. Amy H. Brennan (440)

SECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS

2. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER.

Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh, PA Notice No Closing Date: May 29, 2015

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

Pike River Restoration Adaptive Design: Restoring Structure and Function in an Urban Floodplain - from cabbages to cordgrass

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

Josephine County, Oregon Board of Commissioners: Jim Riddle, Dwight F. Ellis, & Jim Raffenburg

APPENDIX P MASTER STREETS AND HIGHWAYS PLAN ACCESS2040 APPENDIX P (MASTER STREETS AND HIGHWAYS PLAN)

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

Understanding Drainage Options What s Feasible and Legal. February 2019

Soil Reclamation and Site Reinstatement

Holland Country Club Golf Course to Wetlands

Pick your battles Eliminating weedy cottonwood is a fight worth taking on

Habitat Improvements to the Motor Island Shoreline in the Upper Niagara River, NY: A Collaborative Approach

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Wetland Types. Grade Level: Basic. Duration: 30 minutes. Setting: Classroom

Information for File MMJ Main Stem Bassett Creek Restoration Project

Virginia DCR- Natural Heritage Program. Tools for Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning

LICENSES FOR UTILITY CROSSINGS OF PUBLIC LANDS AND WATERS ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA RULES CHAPTER [Rules Effective July 1, 2004]

Environmental Protection Ordinances (Performance Zoning) Bedminster Township, Bucks County

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Date: May 20, Parkmerced Design Standards + Guidelines

7. Biodiversity & Conservation Areas

Recent Tidal Creek Restoration Efforts in Tampa Bay

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS

5/18/2012. Valley Woods wetlands before. Rouge Park prairie before

The Restoration of Reading Creek & Model Stream Buffer Ordinances/ Zoning Regulations for Alabama Streams

Town of Vershire Road Erosion Inventory Report

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ZONE (ERZ) STANDARD

STREAM ALTERATION PRACTICES

Non-Metallic Mining Reclamation Checklist

Yuma East Wetlands Restoration Project. Restoring a Forgotten Landscape on the Lower Colorado

MITIGATION MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN BAYFRONT PARK WETLAND RESTORATION MILL VALLEY, CA

Gamble s Quail Callipepla gambelii. Part Five Recommended Actions

Verde Valley Landscape Character Type

Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Old Brick Township DRI Recommendation Report

Pedestrian Trails Within Regulated Areas

The scope of the plan will focus on the Prospect Heights Slough and Hillcrest Lake as one entity.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Transcription:

las vegas wash coordination committee lvwash.org DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan February 2013

DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Las Vegas Wash Project Coordination Team Prepared by: Jason R. Eckberg Southern Nevada Water Authority Las Vegas Wash Project Coordination Team 100 City Parkway, Suite 700 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 February 2013

DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan Table of Contents Page No. Table of Contents... ii List of Tables... ii List of Figures... ii 1.0 PURPOSE AND GOALS OF THE PLANTING PLAN...1 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY...1 2.1 Site Location...1 2.2 Prior Conditions...1 3.0 REVEGETATION DESIGN...1 3.1 Emergent Wetland Planting Areas...5 3.2 Non-Wetland Planting Areas...6 3.2.1 Non-Wetland Planting Design...7 4.0 PERMIT COMPLIANCE...7 List of Tables Table 1. DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir South revegetation species and quantity...7 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of the DU Wetlands No. 1 planting areas within the Clark County Wetlands Park...2 Figure 2. Location of DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir planting areas...3 Figure 3. Salinity contours across the DU Wetlands No. 1 South non-wetland planting site...4 Figure 4. Depth to water contours across the DU Wetlands No. 1 South non-wetland planting site...4 DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan ii

Page No. Figure 5. Emergent wetland planting areas at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir...5 Figure 6. Non-wetland planting area at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir...6 Figure 7. Non-wetland planting layout at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir...8 DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan iii

1.0 PURPOSE AND GOALS OF THE PLANTING PLAN The purpose of this plan is to describe the revegetation strategies to be implemented at the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir focusing primarily along the south side of the Las Vegas Wash (Wash). This site will provide additional erosion control and increase habitat for the diverse fauna found along the Wash. The general goals for this and other revegetation activities along the Wash are to develop ecologically functioning wetland, riparian, and upland areas that are self-sustaining in the long-term. Revegetation activities are coordinated by staff from the Southern Nevada Water Authority s (SNWA) Las Vegas Wash Project Coordination Team. Specific planning and strategies required to successfully revegetate the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir site are described herein. This plan describes only the planting design for the wetland/emergent areas as well as the southern non-wetland area. The northern non-wetland area adjacent to the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir will be used by contractors during the construction of additional erosion control structures in the future. A new planting plan including these areas will be drafted once the area is vacated by construction activities. 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 2.1 Site Location The DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir is located within the Clark County Wetlands Park (Figures 1 and 2). It is located along the lower Wash, approximately 1.2 miles downstream of the discharge of the Clark County Water Reclamation District. The project is located within the eastern half of Section 26 and western half of Section 25, Township 21 South, Range 22 East, MDB&M. APN 161-26-601-002 and APN 161-26-601-001. 2.2 Prior Conditions Prior to construction, the footprint of the planting area was primarily dominated by salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima) and common reed (Phragmites australis). Native vegetation documented on the site included quailbush (Atriplex lentiformis), arrowweed (Pluchea sericea), smartweed (Polygonum lapathifolium), southern cattail (Typha domingensis), and willow baccharis (Baccharis salicina). Wetland areas only had three species present; salt cedar, southern cattail, and common reed. 3.0 REVEGETATION DESIGN Plantings at the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir will be divided into two separate planting schemes; non-wetland and wetland. Soil salinity and depth to water measurements were taken at locations throughout the non-wetland planting area (Figures 3 and 4). These measurements were used in the decision making process as to which particular plant species would be used in the planting design of the non-wetland planting areas. Both wetland and non-wetland plant design was heavily influenced on successful species establishment at the DU Wetlands No. 2 Weir located just upstream to the northwest of the site. Extending this planting scheme will result in a contiguous habitat which will benefit local wildlife and thereby improve overall ecosystem function. DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir Planting Plan 1

Figure 1: Location of the DU Wetlands No. 1 planting areas within the Clark County Wetlands Park. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 2

Figure 2: Location of DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir planting areas. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 3

Figure 3: Salinity contours across the DU Wetlands No. 1 South non-wetland planting site. Figure 4: Depth to water contours across the DU Wetlands No. 1 South non-wetland planting site. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 4

3.1 Emergent Wetland Planting Areas The emergent planting areas are located along the banks of the Wash on both the north and south side of the channel, as well as within the Wash channel itself (Figures 2 and 5). The majority of plantings will take place where the riprap bank protection meets the water s edge. These plantings will consist of transplanted emergent material and pole cuttings. Beginning in the winter of 2013, emergent plant material will be harvested from nearby locations along the Wash, as well as the Demonstration Wetland within the Henderson Bird Viewing Preserve. In regards to plantings within the Wash channel itself, the area depicted in Figure 2 is an approximation. Field crews doing the actual plantings will identify specific areas where sediment is substantial enough to hold the transplanted plants, therefore the final plant layout is more likely to be scattered throughout the channel rather than a rectangle; the total acreage planted is expected to be similar. A total of 1.34 acres of wetlands are planned. Wetland species harvested from the Wash and Demonstration Wetland and planted at DU1 Emergent (DU1E) areas are bulrush (Schoenoplectus acutus var. occidentalis), Olney threesquare (Schoenoplectus americanus), and California tule (Schoenoplectus californicus). The quantity of each species is subject to change due to abundance and availability of each species in the areas in which transplants will be taken. Pole plantings will exclusively come from established areas along the Wash. Species collected will include sandbar willow (Salix exigua), Goodding s willow (Salix gooddingii), Fremont s cottonwood (Populus fremontii), and seep willow (Baccharis salicifolia). Figure 5. Emergent wetland planting areas at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 5

3.2 Non-Wetland Planting Areas As part of the construction requirements of the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir, the non-wetland area was hydroseeded with native plant seeds. The species included in the hydroseed mix were desert saltbush (Atriplex polycarpa), four-wing saltbush (A. canescens), and alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides). Container plantings will compliment these hydroseeded species to enhance the restoration of the area. The planting is scheduled to take place as part of the Las Vegas Wash Coordination Committee s 22 nd semi-annual Green-Up event in the spring of 2013. The non-wetland planting area (Figures 2 and 6) has depth to water and salinity concentrations that will likely provide a good planting substrate for typical non-wetland plants that have been planted in previous plantings along the Wash. A mixture of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana) and screwbean mesquite (Prosopis pubescens) will provide the largest component of the new plantings. In addition to these trees, a mixture of shrubs and grasses will help provide a diversity of plant types mimicking nearby natural areas: willow baccharis (Baccharis salicina), globemallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua), desert marigold (Baileya multiradiata), desert wolfberry (Lycium andersonii), and alkali sacaton. A total of 3000 individual plants will be planted: 800 mesquites and 2200 shrubs and grasses (Table 1). The non-wetland area is just over seven acres in size, resulting in approximately 427 plants per acre. Figure 6. Non- wetland planting area at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir. Scientific name Common name Quantity DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 6

Baccharis salicina Willow baccharis 400 Baileya multiradiata Desert marigold 500 Lycium andersonii Wolfberry 400 Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana Honey mesquite 400 Prosopis pubescens Screwbean mesquite 400 Sporobolus airoides Alkali sacaton 500 Sphaeralcea ambigua Globemallow 400 TOTAL 3000 Table 1. DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir South revegetation species and quantity. 3.2.1 Non-Wetland Planting Design The design of the non-wetland area was done to mimic natural establishment while acknowledging that the area is within a public park and will be visited by the public. Species will be generally grouped into areas commonly dominated by a single species, the exception being a large area with a mixture of smaller flowering shrubs (Figure 7). Where individual areas border each other, a transitional area will be created resulting in mixture of species from each adjoining area. Species locations were determined by the salinity and depth to water measurements (Figures 3 and 4). Specifically, alkali sacaton and both mesquites were placed in areas with the highest salinity. Depth to water did not have a significant impact on plant placement - only plant selection. 4.0 PERMIT COMPLIANCE A single 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) was granted for the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir. The wetlands mitigation requirement under this permit (SPK-2010-00285-SG) is 1.22 acres. It is anticipated that the planting along the banks and within the Wash channel will be sufficient to meet this requirement. These wetland areas will be monitored to ensure they are meeting the criteria agreed upon between the Corps and SNWA in a letter dated July 15, 2010. Annual reports will be submitted to the Corps in regards to this project until all mitigation requirements have been met. The contractor responsible for the construction of the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir was issued a stormwater permit by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. This permit covers areas on the north and south side of the channel for the DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir, as well as two other weirs built concurrently downstream of this site (Duck Creek Confluence and Upper Narrows). The revegetation requirement to close this permit is to establish vegetation at 70% of the pre-existing total cover. Detailed monitoring was not done prior to construction; however, aerial imagery shows that approximately 50% of the area had pre-existing vegetative cover. Assuming it was all native vegetation, the requirement would be to establish 35% cover. It is expected that the plant density at the time of planting will ensure permit closure in one growing season, as well as far exceeding this permit s requirements once plantings have taken place at all three weirs. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 7

Figure 7. Non-Wetland planting layout at DU Wetlands No. 1 Weir. DU Wetlands No. 1 Planting Plan 8