PEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT PEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT ( )

Similar documents
11 GUIDING PRINCIPLES:

to the Pearson Dogwood Open House! REZONING

WHAT IS A POLICY STATEMENT?

The Cambie Corridor 2015 Fall workshop series. What we heard WORKSHOP OUTLINE

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

COMMUNITY HEART HEATHER STREET LANDS

Cambie Corridor Planning Program Phase Two Draft Plan. Standing Committee on City Services and Budgets May 5, 2011

Cambie Corridor Planning Program Phase One. Standing Committee on Transportation and Traffic January 19, 2010

Crofton Manor 2803 West 41st Avenue WHAT WE HEARD. Public Consultation: Phase 1

Existing Site. Ash Crescent at 57th Avenue. Ash Crescent with Low Rise. Ash Crescent with Giant Sequoias

Hilltop Town Garden City

Figure 3-1: Public Realm Plan

Oakridge Redevelopment: New Park Concept Overview and Phase 1 Engagement Results

WHAT WE HEARD REPORT - Summary Bonnie Doon Mall Redevelopment Application (LDA )

New St. Paul s Hospital and Health Campus. PHASE 1: Guiding Principles CONSULTATION SUMMARY. April 2016

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

Coronation Park Neighbourhood Plan. Open House #2 15 September 2016

4 Semi-Private & Private Open Spaces

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

01 Welcome! About Ontario Shores

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

1 Welcome! UBC Okanagan Master Plan Update - Open House

Age Friendly Design ( 2:15 Breakout Session )

U Boulevard Area, 2018 Update. U Boulevard Area Update. Public Consultation Summary Report

FUNDAMENTAL BUILDING BLOCKS

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

Planning Board Briefing

Blood Alley Square/Trounce Alley Redesign

Queensborough Eastern Neighbourhood Node. Community Open House

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Official Plan Review

Rezoning Frequently Asked Questions

Envision Concord Public Event Part 3. October 21, :30 AM 12:00 PM Concord-Carlisle High School Cafeteria

Welcome to Our Open House

Loved hearing what others shared and having a dialogue about the possibilities/opportunities

Agincourt Mall Planning Framework Review Public Open House #2 Consultation Summary

Description of Preferred Alternative

CAMBIE CORRIDOR PLAN

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

UBC URBAN STUDIO, FALL 2002 PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED

MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY PLAN

Rio/29 Small Area Plan. Design Plan & Implementation Framework Open House - January 25, 2018

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

Burnside Gorge Neighbourhood Plan. Engagement Summary

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

WHAT IS A POLICY STATEMENT?

Chapter 13 Residential Areas: Appendices APPENDIX 1 Residential Areas

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

City Council March 27, Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan

Richmond Road Complete Street Meeting #1, April 25, 2016

Schedule B to Report PLS

HE VISION. Building a Better Connected Place

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NCP AREA #3 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) MEETING #6

General Manager, Planning and Development; General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture. Proposed Mini-Park and Plaza Designations

Design Specifications & Requirements Manual

Introduction. Intent of the Plan. Urban Design and Land Use Approach

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies


Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

Arkansas River Corridor

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

2018 Northampton Township Comprehensive Plan

planning toronto s downtown Parks and Public Realm Plan Request for Proposals Information Meeting Andrew Farncombe, Project Manager August 19, 2015

appendix and street interface guidelines

APPENDICES DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 A1

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Design Specifications & Requirements Manual

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

Supports Item No. 8 P&E Committee Agenda July 23, 2009

Further input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Welcome. Thank you for attending our first Early Input Opportunity Meeting. The Purpose of this meeting is to: Introduce you to the project team

The River Hub: NEW BUILDINGS

PILLAR FOUR INTEGRATE LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION

8.0 Design and Form of Development 43/

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Neighborhood Districts

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Waverley West B Secondary Planning Process. Open House South Pointe School April 25, 2018

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Community Meeting November 18, 2015

City Avenue Official Map Workshop Meeting Notes

1.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community design

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

AGINCOURT SECONDARY PLAN

3 Parks, Open Spaces and the Public Realm

Transcription:

PEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT (2013 07 10) 1

INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Approximately 200 people attended the June 6 th and 8 th open houses for Pearson Dogwood Lands. The City of Vancouver has received nearly 100 responses to the questionnaire (20 from the open houses itself, and nearly 80 online). Respondents were asked to gauge how each of the three planning concepts ( Core, Continuum and Cluster ) fare in accordance to a series of guiding principles drafted by City staff. There were four possible choices they can pick for each question: does meet almost meet does not meet I don t know (*The does meet and almost meet choices were grouped together in this report.) For this questionnaire the guiding principles were grouped into four categories and listed as: OPEN SPACES + PUBLIC PLACES Parkland Natural Features Topography Design of Public Spaces Water MOBILITY, ACCESSIBILITY + CONNECTIONS Rapid Transit Priority of Pathways for Non Motorised Transportation Pathway Connections Diagonal Connections Integration Streets for People Protect Local Bikeways Vehicle Access Part of an Active Transport System COMPLETE COMMUNITY Community Amenities SITE PLANNING + BUILDING DESIGN Topography Intensify Activity at the Canada Line Station Transitions Most questionnaire respondents lived and/or work around the Pearson area, speak English most often at home, and are around 30 to 49 years of age. There are slightly more females than males, and most do not have children under 19 living at home. As one can read from this report, the Continuum Concept was considered by most respondents to most successfully exemplify the listed guiding principles; it received the most number of does meet and almost meet responses. The Core and Cluster Concepts closely followed behind. For the open ended answer, many respondents noted concerns about institutional housing, needs for adult daycare, and the need to retain the therapeutic pool. Others voiced concerns about the future of the 57 th Avenue Farm. 2

RESPONDENTS DEMOGRAPHICS How did you hear about this questionnaire? Total # of Respondents: 95 CoV Event (Open House, Workshop,etc) 49 52%* vancouver.ca 2 2%* Facebook 8 8%* Twitter 0 0%* Email/List Serve 25 26%* Friend(Word of Mouth) 22 22%* Poster 2 2%* Other 5 5%* What is your connection to Pearson Dogwood? Total # of Respondents: 97 I live in this area 30 31%* I work in this area 23 24%* I am a visitor 9 9%* I am a resident of Pearson/ Dogwood 2 2%* I am a friend/ family of a Pearson/ Dogwood Resident 18 19%* I use the facilities on this site 22 23%* Other 23 24%* * Percentages add up to more than 100% because people could pick more than one choice. Total # of Respondents: 93 Total # of Respondents: 92 Total # of Respondents: 84 Total # of Respondents: 80 3

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: OPEN SPACES + PUBLIC PLACES GUIDING PRINCIPLE: PARK LAND Provide at least of 2.5 acres of City owned park space on the site. In addition to larger park space(s), create a variety of open spaces including smaller, more intimate open areas, and linear connecting landscape or pathways. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: NATURAL FEATURES Retain significant trees and preserve natural features wherever possible. Organize buildings, open spaces, roads and public ways around retained trees. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: TOPOGRAPHY Integrate the slope of the site into the site design as an asset and a distinguishing feature. Take advantage of the slope to optimize views to the south and to Mount Baker. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: DESIGN OF PUBLIC SPACES Parks and open spaces should foster social interaction and become neighbourhood meeting places. Create flexible spaces and public places that can accommodate a range of activities. 4

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: OPEN SPACES + PUBLIC PLACES (con t) GUIDING PRINCIPLE: WATER Incorporate water in the design of open spaces and public places. Take advantage of the natural slope of the site in the design of rainwater management elements. Reflect the natural history of streams on the site. 5

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: MOBILTIY, ACCESSIBILITY + CONNECTIONS GUIDING PRINCIPLE: RAPID TRANSIT Provide for a new Canada line station at the corner of 57th Avenue and Cambie Street. Use the station as a key organizing element for the site design. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: PRIORITY PATHWAYS FOR NON MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION Focus first on pedestrians and wheelchair users, and then on cyclists. Incorporate accessibility into all aspects of site design. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: PATHWAY CONNECTIONS Pathways and walkways are important organizing and connecting elements of the site. Routes can be both direct and meandering, minimizing slope, and designed for wheelchair users, pedestrians, and cyclists of all ages and abilities. Direct pathways should be obvious and intuitive through a simple network of direct connections between transit, public spaces and focal points. Weather protection and areas to rest should be incorporated. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: DIAGONAL CONNECTIONS Express and facilitate diagonal connections across the site to transit, shops, and schools. 6

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: MOBILTIY, ACCESSIBILITY + CONNECTIONS (con t) GUIDING PRINCIPLE: INTEGRATION Integrate the site with the surrounding community and the adjacent Langara Gardens. Create visual and physical links throughout the site and provide a strong visual link to the City park from one of the adjacent streets. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: STREETS FOR PEOPLE Design and configure streets as a focus for people and activities. Ensure that vehicle traffic does not divide or dominate the site. Local streets should be highly calmed and discourage direct vehicle movement across the site. Discourage short cutting traffic in the neighbourhood to the south. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: PROTECT LOCAL BIKEWAYS Minimize, reduce or eliminate vehicle impacts on the Heather Street bikeway and the 59th Avenue Greenway/bikeway (North Arm Trail). Wherever possible, conditions for pedestrians and cyclists should be improved in the area, through improved design and increased separation from vehicular traffic. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: VEHICLE ACCESS The majority of vehicle access to the site should be from west 57th Avenue and Cambie Street. Create regular intersections as opposed to off set intersections at Ash and west 59th and the new Ash connector and West 57th Avenue. 7

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: MOBILTIY, ACCESSIBILITY + CONNECTIONS (con t) GUIDING PRINCIPLE: PART OF AN ACTIVE TRANSPORT SYSTEM Consider the site as part of a larger cycling and walkway system connecting to Langara Gardens, Oakridge Centre, and the Canada Line pedestrian and cyclist bridge over the Fraser River. QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: COMPLETE COMMUNITY GUIDING PRINCIPLE: COMMUNITY AMENITIES Provide a range of community amenities such as adult daycare, recreational facilities, park space and community meeting space to meet existing and future needs in the area. Organize and cluster these amenities to allow for a highly visible presence and in close proximity to transit. 8

QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK: SITE PLANNING + BUILDING DESIGN GUIDING PRINCIPLE: TOPOGRAPHY + VIEWS Organize buildings and open spaces to work with the slope of the site while optimizing public views across the site to Mount Baker. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: INTENSIFY ACTIVITY AT THE CANADA LINE STATION Focus a higher level of activity, energy, density and height along west 57th Avenue and Cambie Street with the future Canada Line Station, decreasing intensity moving west and south across the site. GUIDING PRINCIPLE: TRANSITIONS Create a transition in building heights along west 57th and 59th Avenues that respect the scale of the surrounding community, noting the opportunity for these areas to redevelop in conjunction with the Cambie Corridor Plan. 9

FEEDBACK ON OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS HEALTH CARE MODELS A sizeable number of respondents voiced their objections to possible continuation of institutional living at Pearson s future redevelopment. They were largely opposed to Housing Types #3 (Enhanced Apartments), #4 (Transitional Housing and Shared Supported Living), and #5 (Complex Care) as presented by VCH/Dialog on the Housing Continuum Board which they saw as institution housing. They maintained independent living and global best practices, according to many opinions, is what should be sought after. Many also noted that it is within the UN Charter that persons with disabilities do have the rights to live independently, and make their own living choices. There were, however, a few respondents noted they do support some amount of shared supported living models, especially for young adults with disabilities and seniors. For example, they stated shared living could offer young adults the benefit of living together and supporting each other, as a community within a community. Others mentioned that their support for the Pearson Dogwood Plan is due to the fact many of our weak and vulnerable people with disabilities are living in horrendous conditions on the street and there is a desperate need for this type of housing as well as others such as group homes. Additionally, many of them also noted the open house questionnaire should have included a survey about the housing continuum presented by VCH. FARMERS ON 57 th Many respondents stressed the need to retain the 57 th Avenue Farm. They considered this farm as both a therapeutic gathering space and a teaching facility for the neighbourhood. For some, the farm plays a role in the healing process for not just persons with disabilities and seniors, but also the urban poor. Others pointed out the three planning concepts should more clearly establish food systems within them. THERAPEUTIC POOL Many respondents also noted the importance of the Stan Strong Pool to the site, and that the details in how the pool will be sited and designed should be considered even at the earlier stages of planning. Others had more specific ideas for the future therapeutic pool; for example, the therapeutic pool could retain some degree of privacy by having large shrubbery screening larger windows; and, the therapeutic pool could be within one building with the YMCA but it is important to be separate from the public pool given the therapeutic pool users may need more time and space (and privacy due to their disabilities) for changing. SENIORS CARE A notable number of respondents opined that an adult daycare is crucial for future developments at Pearson Dogwood, given the neighbourhood s ageing population. Additionally, some pointed out housing and community facilities dedicated for seniors should be sited away from places where younger adults and children may frequent (i.e. the proposed YMCA), as children often don t look when playing and do not understand it s hard for wheelchairs/ scooters to move out of their way. OTHER ISSUES Other issues raised (but not prominently mentioned) in the feedback were: Congestion along Cambie Corridor + Canada Line Concerns for over densification and the Tower form Need for facilities to be close to transit Capture History of the Site in future designs Total Qualitative Responses: 73 10

WORD CLOUD BASED ON OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS 11