Residential Commons at Barry s Corner. Boston civic design commission February 5, 2013

Similar documents
Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SPORTS FACILITY PROJECT WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO. 87 BOSTON LANDING

Community Task Force Meeting June 19, Planned Development 500 Huntington WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Planning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016

Revitalization Guidelines for Corridors, Villages and Town Centres

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Background/Context M EMORANDUM

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

Hudson Group North America LLC

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

DRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines

LANDMARK CENTER BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2013

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

AN ORDINANCE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

VISION AND GUIDING DESIGN PRINCIPLES

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. March 19, 2014/Calendar No. 6

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

Institutional Overlay Zone (IOZ) Regulatory Framework

NEIGHBORHOOD 3: UNIVERSITY EDGE

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

shown on the following page.

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)

Allston Brighton Boston College Task Force Meeting. Brighton Marine Health Center March 27, 2013

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

Urban Design Brief Fanshawe Park Road. Competition Toyota

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

Derry Green Corporate Business Park

Forest Hills Improvement Initiative A Partnership for Building a Better Community. Use & Design Guidelines September 23, 2008

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

Chapter II: Building Placement, Massing and Access

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

I. Introduction. Prior Approvals

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Bank Street Secondary Plan

NWI Wetland Public Waters Inventory Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential. High Density Residential. Public or Institutional

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

St. Kevin s Area Planning Collaborative

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Context Plan and Urban Design Guidelines for the lands west of Provost Drive

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Statement of Justification for Sketch Plan Application No BETHESDA MARKET

ZONING MAP CHANGE AND TEXT AMENDMENT REPORT RIVERFRONT ZONING (RIV) TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS

GUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565

Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan

Appendix. The following pages provide definitions of some of the more specialized terms used in the Design Guidelines.

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Background

Architectural Review Board Report

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Urban Design Brief. 583, 585 and 589 OXFORD STREET EAST. Salt Clinic Canada Inc.

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

URBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Transcription:

Residential Commons at Barry s Corner Boston civic design commission February 5, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS project summary 3 PROJECT site 4 PLANNING APPROACh 6 Parcel Diagams 6 Design Principles 8 Street Activation Plan 13 Public Realm Plan 14 design proposal 15 Floor Plans 15 Building Elevations 19 3D Model Views 23 Renderings 26 BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 2

program The Project entails the redevelopment of a 2.67 acre site located at the intersection of North Harvard Street and Western Avenue in Allston to be ground-leased by Harvard University to Samuels & Associates. It includes the construction of an approximately 350,000 square foot building consisting of: approximately 325 rental residential units; approximately 45,000 square feet of ground floor retail space and residential amenities; and approximately 180 below-grade parking spaces and 41 new onstreet parking spaces within the Project site. The overall Project site consists of two areas: (i) the 2.03 acre development site that contains the proposed buildings; and (ii) the 0.64 acre area along the westerly and northerly borders of the development site, on which will be located two new privately-owned and maintained publicly-accessible streets: Smith Field Drive and Grove Street. The program consists of residential uses on the upper floors, retail uses and residential amenities on the ground floor, and parking in the basement. The north building ranges from seven to nine stories in height and is located along Grove Street. The south building is six stories tall and has frontage on Smith Field Drive, Western Avenue, and North Harvard Street. massing The proposed Project is largely shaped by the surrounding public realm. Thus, strong, consistent, and defined streetwalls along public ways are important. The buildings are planned with prominent frontages on all orientations, and each orientation will play a different role in placemaking. The Project buildings will respond specifically and appropriately to each orientation and contribute to the quality of the urban fabric. The urban design strategy for Barry s Corner is organized by the following principles: 1) Provide continuous retail frontage along public streets; 2) Provide diversity of open space; 3) Provide visual permeability and physical pathways to Smith Field; 4) Plan an assemblage of building forms to foster diversity and appropriate scale; 5) Locate the greater building heights toward the north and away from the neighborhood. The urban design principles result in a massing solution that articulates two distinct buildings which are connected by a singlelevel retail base. The north building is nine stories tall and steps down to seven stories at North Harvard Street. The south building is six stories tall. The buildings address public streets with a distinct base that allows the retail facades to engage pedestrians while providing a visual separation from the building above. Above the base, the dominant plane of the building facades are aligned to ensure continuity of the streetwall but incorporate minor stepbacks. The minor stepbacks establish a pattern of architectural elements that create diversity along the frontage of the block. The minor stepbacks also work with integrated mechanical penthouses and roof screens to achieve visual resolution at the top of the building architecture. PROJECT SUMMARY ZONING The Project site is currently part of the Harvard University Institutional Subdistrict of the Allston Neighborhood District. The existing uses on the site are being relocated to other University owned properties, and those relocations are the subject of a separate filing with the BRA. An Institutional Master Plan Notification Form to start the process for an IMP Amendment for the relocations was submitted to the BRA in October 2012. The Project site will be rezoned to remove it from the Harvard University Institutional Subdistrict and add it to the Western Avenue/Soldiers Field Road Community Commercial Subdistrict, in which Planned Development Areas (PDAs) are allowed. As a result, the Project site will become eligible to be designated a Planned Development Area (PDA), under Section 80C of the Boston Zoning Code. The PDA Development Plan will set forth the use, bulk, dimensional, parking, loading, and design requirements applicable to the Project and will, if approved, supersede underlying zoning requirements. Because the proposed building exceeds 50,000 square feet of gross floor area, the Project is subject to the requirements of Large Project Review pursuant to Article 80 of the Code. The Project will be reviewed by the Boston Civic Design Commission (BCDC) under the provisions of Article 28 of the Code. The proposed project has a floor area ratio (FAR) of 4.0 and building heights of 100 feet for the north building and 70 feet for the south building, exclusive of enclosed mechanical penthouses. BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 3

HARVARD SQUARE HARVARD YARD HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL BARRY S CORNER Context Plan 0 800 1600 n PROJECT SITE BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 4

north harvard street WESTERN AVENUE Barry s Corner Site Aerial Project Site Development Site Boundary PROJECT SITE BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 5

PROJECT SITE smith field Development site BOUNDARY GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. smith field drive buildable area 2.03 acres western avenue Parcel Designation The development site boundary is 2.03 acres, and the development allows for the uninterrupted operations of the Ed Portal. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 6

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE PRIVATE STREETS PROJECT SITE smith field Development site BOUNDARY GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. landscape buffer sidewalk smith field drive buildable area western avenue Setbacks and Development Site Boundary PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 7

future mixed use athletics smith field PROJECT SITE Development site BOUNDARY SERVICE GROVE street ACCESS TO PARKING Ed Portal north harvard st. smith field drive buildable area larger tenant continuous retail frontage western avenue SWISSBAKERS STONE HEARTH PIZZA PRINCIPLE ONE: Provide Continuous Retail Frontage Along Public Streets Although retail has recently opened at Stone Hearth Pizza and soon will open at the Swissbakers, this parcel will be the commercial anchor for Barry s Corner. We anticipate multiple tenants with continuous shop and restaurant storefronts along Western Avenue and North Harvard Street and with storefronts wrapping around the building corners to engage pedestrians. A larger tenant like a food market would require a larger footprint. Frontage would be limited to ensure diversity on the street with more space available at the center of the site. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 8

PROJECT SITE smith field Development site BOUNDARY GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. smith field drive residential amenity market space (tables and chairs) western avenue Portal to the park (forecourt to smith field) PRINCIPLE TWO: Provide Diversity of Open Space This site is intended as a common ground for the neighborhood. We envision several types of open space: 1. Market Space is lined with active edges and can accommodate tables and chairs from adjacent restaurants, the weekly Farmers Market, and outdoor seating open to all. 2. Portal to the Park is an overlook to Smith Field and can accommodate outdoor seating and community activities. 3. Residential Amenity would include shared open space for residents. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 9

PROJECT SITE pedestrian connection smith field Development site BOUNDARY GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. smith field drive light and air between buildings western avenue PRINCIPLE THREE: Provide Visual Penetrability and Pathways to Smith Field Both Western Avenue and the new private Grove Street provide important means of pedestrian access for the neighborhood to Smith Field. Separating the massing into two forms allows a more appropriate scale and visual penetrability. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 10

PROJECT SITE smith field Development site BOUNDARY GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. smith field drive western avenue PRINCIPLE FOUR: Plan an Assemblage of Building Forms to Foster Diversity and Appropriate Scale At this seam between neighborhood and university, a cluster of forms reduces the overall scale of development. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 11

PROJECT SITE smith field Development site BOUNDARY smith field drive shorter (5-6 stories) taller (9 stories) GROVE street Ed Portal north harvard st. western avenue PRINCIPLE FIVE: Locate the Greater Building Heights to the North Away From the Neighborhood The streetwall at Western Avenue will be lower as it faces the adjacent neighborhood. To the north, the massing abuts future University development. PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 12

SMITH FIELD SMITH FIELD DRIVE GROVE STREET MIXED USE ATHLETIC FACILITY academic way north harvard street mixed use institutional WESTERN AVENUE spurr STREET travis STREET bertram STREET Street Activation Strategy Existing Active Use 0 65 130 n Planned Active Use Future Active Use PLANNING APPROACH BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 13

SMITH FIELD GROVE STREET Public Realm Plan - PNF 0 64 128 SMITH FIELD DRIVE north harvard street WESTERN AVENUE Public Realm Plan - CURRENT 0 32 64 n DESIGN PROPOSAL BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 14

SMITH FIELD ED PORTAL amenities GROVE STREET Ground Floor Plan - PNF 0 64 128 SMITH FIELD DRIVE amenities loading parking ramp lobby retail retail retail retail retail north harvard street retail WESTERN AVENUE Ground Floor Plan - CURRENT 0 32 64 n DESIGN PROPOSAL BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 15

SMITH FIELD ED PORTAL GROVE STREET Floors 2-6 - PNF 0 64 128 SMITH FIELD DRIVE north harvard street WESTERN AVENUE Floors 2-6 0 32 64 n DESIGN PROPOSAL BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 16

SMITH FIELD ED PORTAL GROVE STREET SMITH FIELD DRIVE north harvard street WESTERN AVENUE Floor 7 0 32 64 n DESIGN PROPOSAL BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 17

SMITH FIELD ED PORTAL GROVE STREET SMITH FIELD DRIVE north harvard street WESTERN AVENUE Floors 8-9 0 32 64 n DESIGN PROPOSAL BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 18

CLEAR VISION GLASS CLEAR VISION GLASS METAL PANEL ROOF EL: 119 0 9TH FLOOR EL: 108 6 ROOF EL: 87 6 HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL 8TH FLOOR EL: 98 0 7TH FLOOR EL: 87 6 METAL PANEL BRICK MASONRY 6TH FLOOR EL: 77 0 5TH FLOOR EL: 66 6 4TH FLOOR EL: 56 6 3RD FLOOR EL: 46 0 2ND FLOOR EL: 35 0 RETAIL EL: 17 2 CLEAR VISION GLASS METAL PANEL East Elevation 0 20 40 BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 19

METAL PANEL CLEAR VISION GLASS CLEAR VISION GLASS METAL PANEL HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ROOF EL: 119 0 9TH FLOOR EL: 108 6 8TH FLOOR EL: 98 0 ROOF EL: 87 6 7TH FLOOR EL: 87 6 METAL PANEL 6TH FLOOR EL: 77 0 5TH FLOOR EL: 66 6 4TH FLOOR EL: 56 6 BRICK MASONRY 3RD FLOOR EL: 46 0 2ND FLOOR EL: 35 0 RETAIL EL: 17 2 South Elevation 0 20 40 BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 20

CLEAR VISION GLASS HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL ROOF EL: 119 0 9TH FLOOR EL: 108 6 8TH FLOOR EL: 98 0 7TH FLOOR EL: 87 6 METAL PANEL 6TH FLOOR EL: 77 0 5TH FLOOR EL: 66 6 4TH FLOOR EL: 56 6 3RD FLOOR EL: 46 0 2ND FLOOR EL: 35 0 RETAIL EL: 17 2 BRICK MASONRY BRICK MASONRY West Elevation 0 20 40 BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 21

CLEAR VISION GLASS HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL HORIZONTAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ROOF EL: 119 0 9TH FLOOR EL: 108 6 ROOF EL: 98 0 8TH FLOOR EL: 98 0 7TH FLOOR EL: 87 6 6TH FLOOR EL: 77 0 5TH FLOOR EL: 66 6 4TH FLOOR EL: 56 6 3RD FLOOR EL: 46 0 2ND FLOOR EL: 35 0 RETAIL EL: 17 2 CLEAR VISION GLASS North Elevation 0 20 40 BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 22

Aerial View - Looking North BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 23

View from Western Avenue - Looking West BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 24

View from Smith Field - Looking East BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 25

View from Western Avenue - Looking West BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 26

View from Western Avenue - Looking East BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 27

View from Smith Field - Looking East BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 28

View from Western Avenue - Looking West BOSTON CIVIC DESIGN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2013 29