Planning & Development. Background. Subject Lands

Similar documents
APPLICATION BRIEFING

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

M E M O R A N D U M. Chair and Members of North West Planning Advisory Committee

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

6.0 Land Use Policies for Rural Settlements. 6.1 Rural Settlement Strategy

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

2.4 COMMERCIAL POLICIES

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Urban Design Brief. Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario. Prepared by Coletara Development

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

March 21, 2018 ALCA Meeting. March 21, 2018

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

BYLAW C A Bylaw of Rocky View County to amend Land Use Bylaw C

AGINCOURT SECONDARY PLAN

280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

240 and 242 Finch Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

4155 Yonge Street Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application Preliminary Report

MOMENTUM. Design Brief. Site Plan Control and Minor Variance Applications. 59 Russell Avenue

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief Proposed Residential Development 5219 Upper Middle Road City of Burlington

Proposed Kenmount Hill CDS Amendment. Public Hearing October 25 th, 2018

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

I. Introduction. Prior Approvals

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Land Use Review- Former Parkway Belt West Lands- Fieldgate Drive and Audubon Boulevard

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

NEW HOMES IN ANCASTER S MATURE NEIGHBOURHOODS WHAT WE HAVE HEARD

Re: 1110 Fisher Avenue Proposed Residential Development Revised Proposal File D PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM

Planning Rationale Fernbank Road, Ottawa. Major Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Application Ontario Inc.

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Planning Assessment Report Victoria Street, Niagara-on-the-Lake June, Planning & Design Inc.

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

HURON COMMUNITY PLAN

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

5.0 VILLAGE AREAS. February 2008 Municipality of West Elgin ~ Official Plan 5-1

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Queensborough Eastern Neighbourhood Node. Community Open House

A Growing Community Rural Settlement Areas

Dufferin Street and Centre Street Area Specific Policies

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY (WARD 8) NW CORNER OF RICHMOND ROAD AND 33 STREET SW BYLAWS 1P2015 AND 7D2015

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Planning Assessment Report. Southeast Corner of John Street West & Victoria Street, Niagara-on-the-Lake April, Planning & Design Inc.

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

The Development Review Process. Presentation to the GSSC IAC

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton

Report Regarding Site Plan Control for 55 Wellspring Way (File No. SP-06-16)

808 Mount Pleasant Road Zoning Amendment Application Request for Interim Direction Report

Bressa Developments Limited. Planning Justification Report. Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

APPLICATION FOR REZONING PROPERTY CITY OF HOLLAND, MICHIGAN. Name of Applicant. Address, and Phone # of Applicant

Appendix I. Checklists

and services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Official Plan Review

CONTENTS 6.1 URBAN DESIGN

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

Development Permit Application Form. Property Owner Information as Registered on Legal Title Property Owner Name: Phone:

Crofton Manor 2803 West 41st Avenue WHAT WE HEARD. Public Consultation: Phase 1

Transcription:

Planning & Development APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Planning Advisory Committee Submitted by: Jason Fox, Director of Planning & Development Date: Subject: Development Agreement Application by Brentwood Developments Limited to permit three 50-unit 4-storey residential buildings at 185 Kaulback Street. Background On June 7, 2018, Brentwood Developments Limited applied for a development agreement to permit a multiple unit residential development on lands at 185 Kaulback Street. The proposed development will consist of three 50 unit four-storey residential buildings with underground and surface parking. Subject Lands The subject lands are currently made up of two separate properties that are in the process of being consolidated. The first property has frontage on Kaulback Street and is identified as PID no. 20166518. The second is a portion of PID no. 20445771. The subject lands, once consolidated, will be 2.03 hectares (5.005 acres) in area and have approximately 94.2 metres (309 feet) of frontage on Kaulback Street. The lands are currently undeveloped and mostly forested including a few stands of mature trees as well as some areas of scrub vegetation. Grades on the subject lands are CEMETERY quite steep, dropping from an elevation of 51 metres (167 feet) along the southern edge of the property to 40 metres (131 feet) along the northern edge. Doggett Brook flows in a gulley along the eastern edge of the lands. The brook and the gulley are zoned Environmental Reserve (E1) and these lands are owned by the Town. The subject lands are zoned General Residential (R3) and are situated in the General Residential Future Land Use Designation. This section of Kaulback Street is primarily residential and consists mostly of single detached dwellings. There are two and three unit residential conversions nearby as well as several multiple unit buildings in the vicinity, including a 6-unit building situated immediately to the north of the property on Kaulback Street. A church property lies opposite Doggett Brook to the east. MINERVA DRIVE LAVINIA DRIVE KAULBACK STREET SUBJECT PROPERTY Air Photo showing the subject lands and surrounding area GLENWOOD DRIVE ROYALTY STREET

Page 2 CEMETERY ROYALTY STREET MINERVA DRIVE KING STREET KAULBACK STREET SUBJECT PROPERTY LAVINIA DRIVE GLENWOOD DRIVE Excerpt from the Town s Land Use By-law Zoning Map showing the zoning of the subject lands and surrounding area View of the Subject Lands looking southeast from Kaulback Street, taken opposite the 6-unit residential building located at165 Kaulback

43.6 Application Briefing Development Proposal Page 3 Brentwood Developments has submitted a site plan showing three four-storey, 50-unit residential buildings. The proposed buildings are situated in a U configuration with a common central driveway and central green space. Each 23.5 x 67.4 metre (77 x 221 foot) building features four levels of dwelling units plus one underground parking level. A copy of the preliminary site plan submitted by the applicant is shown at the bottom of this page. The three buildings and surface parking areas are situated around the periphery of the site and will cover much of the property. An 1220 m 2 (13,132 ft 2 ) area of existing trees will be retained at the centre of the site and will serve as common green space for the development. The above-ground parking lots will have spaces for 114 vehicles. These lots are located to the rear of the property away from Kaulback Street behind two of the buildings. Each of the buildings include an additional 44 below grade parking spaces for a total of 246 spaces for the entire 150 unit development. The site plan shows a central driveway providing access to the site from Kaulback Street along with two additional driveways onto Kaulback that provide access to the underground parking level of two of the buildings. 43.1 44.3 44.8 46.0 KAULBACK STREET 43.8 43.8 50 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING BASEMENT EL 43.6 MAIN EL 45.8 UNDERGROUND PARKING 44 CARS 45.1 43.8 45.8 45.1 45.6 PARKING 42 CARS 45.0 46.1 47.5 48.0 46.0 47.3 50 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING BASEMENT EL 44.8 MAIN EL 48.0 UNDERGROUND PARKING 44 CARS 46.0 46.0 45.1 47.1 47.8 47.8 47.8 47.0 46.0 48.4 47.8 47.5 46.5 48.6 49.8 51.1 48.6 49.8 48.6 50 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING BASEMENT EL 48.6 MAIN EL 51.8 UNDERGROUND PARKING 44 CARS 51.1 51.1 PARKING 50.0 49.5 72 CARS 51.1 51.1 49.0 51.0 Preliminary Site Plan Submitted by Brentwood Developments Limited

Photos of a development in Elmsdale submitted by Brentwood Developments Limited to illustrate the exterior appearance of the proposed buildings Application Status Page 4 The proposed buildings are situated approximately 8 metres (26 feet) from neighbouring properties to the north, south and east. The buildings are situated 10 metres (33 feet) from Kaulback Street. The site plan shows a treed buffer, approximately 2 metres (6.6 feet) wide along the property lines where the development abuts neighbouring residential uses at 171 and 201 Kaulback. The applicant has indicated that the exterior appearance of the proposed buildings will be similar to those constructed as part of a development in Elmsdale and he has submitted photos of those buildings. These photos are shown on page 4 of this report. These buildings are four storeys in height and feature a mixture of brick and clapboard siding, a low-pitched roof with accent gables, balconies, and typical residential style windows. The applicant has not yet completed any detailed design work for the proposed development and at this point has submitted preliminary plans only. Elevation drawings and details regarding stormwater management, landscaping, and servicing will be required as this development application proceeds. This application is currently at the initial step of the development agreement application review process. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan along with some photos of proposed unit types. At this stage of the application process, plans are expected to be conceptual as they are still subject to change based on feedback from the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), Staff and the public. The plans submitted by Brentwood Developments Limited are sufficient for the initial meeting with PAC. More detailed plans will be required as this application progresses through the application process. This report is preliminary and intended to provide the Planning Advisory Committee and members of the public with the necessary background to conduct an initial review of the proposed concept and provide feedback to the developer. The Committee is expected to review the proposal based on the applicable policies found in the Town s Planning Documents and provide direction to the developer on how their development could better conform to the Town s planning policies and objectives. A list of relevant policies is attached to this Application Briefing as Appendix A. This proposal is currently at Step 1 of the Town s development application review process. Once Brentwood Developments Limited has had an opportunity to present their proposal to the Committee and once the Committee has had an opportunity to provide their comments, the applicant is expected to identify what, if any, revisions will be made in response to the Committee s feedback. The proposal will then proceed to a second meeting of the Committee which will be advertised and intended to engage the public in the review process (Step 2). Further revisions to the development proposal may be considered at that time based on public feedback at that meeting. Staff will then prepare a Staff Report and recommendation and Staff will conduct an on-line community survey. The results of this survey, along with the Staff Report, will be presented at a third meeting of the Committee (Step 3). At the third meeting, the Committee will make its recommendation to Council and the application will proceed to a public hearing (Step 4). Staff will present a Final Report and recommendation at that time.

Page 5 The Committee also has the option of processing this application using the Standard (short) Application Process which would shorten the process by 1 month. If the Committee opts for the Standard Process, the application would proceed to the next Committee meeting with a full analysis and recommendation from Staff. The public participation survey would take place after the Committee has made its recommendation and the results would only be available to Town Council at the public hearing. Given that the proposal is a more intensive use than surrounding low density residential development it is likely that property owners in the vicinity of the subject lands may have questions about the proposal and wish to be engaged in the application process. It is, therefore, recommended that the Expanded Application Process be followed to ensure that the community s questions and any concerns are addressed. Respectfully Submitted Jason H. Fox, MCIP, LPP Director of Planning & Development

Appendix A Page 6 RELEVANT POLICY Policy R-1 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development that will promote a high quality of life for Truro s residents and result in the creation of attractive streetscapes, vibrant public open spaces, and welcoming pedestrian environments. Policy R-2 It shall be a policy of Council to promote sustainable and vibrant neighbourhoods which convey a sense of belonging, neighbourliness, community pride, civic responsibility, safety, and which foster creative expression, entrepreneurialism, recreation, and collective action. Policy R-3 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development to emphasize and facilitate bicycling and walking as alternatives to private vehicular travel. Policy R-4 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development that facilitates active sustainable lifestyles. Policy R-5 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development to make more efficient use of land, infrastructure, and services. Policy R-6 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage population growth and to accommodate new sustainable residential development in a manner that ensures the best possible quality of life for all residents. Policy R-7 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage context sensitive intensification and infill residential development that complements surrounding homes and preserves or enhances neighbourhood integrity. Policy R-8 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development in the Town that supports a variety of lifestyles and includes a range of housing choices and household types. Policy R-9 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage new residential development and redevelopment opportunities that enhance and complement established and intact residential neighbourhoods. Policy R-12 It shall be a policy of Council to support and give preference to residential proposals that either consist of a mixture of dwelling types or will contribute to a mixture of dwelling types in the neighbourhood. This policy shall not apply to lands in the Limited Residential Designation. Policy R-15 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage residential development in Truro that includes affordable housing units. Policy R-37 It shall be a policy of Council to consider multiple unit residential developments in the General Residential Designation by development agreement.

Page 7 RELEVANT POLICY Policy R-38 When considering multiple unit residential development proposals in the General Residential Designation pursuant to Policy R-37, it shall be a policy of Council to require the following: a) that the proposal be reviewed using the evaluative criteria for development agreements as outlined in Part 11: Implementation of this Strategy; b) that the proposal be compatible with adjacent structures in terms of height, bulk, scale, and lot coverage; c) that the proposal be compatible with adjacent uses in terms of architectural design, including roof pitch, roof type, materials, and fenestration; d) that the proposal does not detract from an established or developing streetscape by significantly varying from the typical height and setback of abutting structures or by having a building that is oriented away from the street; e) that the parking area be suitably landscaped or fenced and situated where it will not be readily visible from neighbouring properties and the public right-of-way; f) that suitable recreational space is available for use by residents of the development; and g) that the proposal contribute to a mixture of dwelling types in the neighbourhood as a whole. Policy P-3 It shall be a policy of Council to use the Recreation Plan as a policy statement that will guide Council when evaluating development proposals and negotiating planning approvals where the proposed development may have an impact on the implementation of projects identified on the Future Recreation Map. Policy P-4 It shall be a policy of Council to only consider those development proposals that are either consistent with or do not hinder the implementation of objectives and projects identified on the Town s Recreation Plan. Policy P-9 It shall be a policy of Council to take into consideration the recommendations of the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan, where applicable, when reviewing development proposals. Policy P-12 It shall be a policy of Council to require that any new multiple unit residential development include provision for recreation and amenity space. The Land Use By-law shall allow for the provision of such space either externally or internally to the building, and that such space may consist of common or individual unit space. Policy P-13 It shall be a policy of Council to consult the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Committee when considering the suitability of amenity space included in any development proposal. Policy G-18 It shall be a policy of Council to consider allowing a reduction in the number of required parking spaces where it can be demonstrated the proposed development is intended for residents who are less likely to own an automobile due to factors such as age, income, or mobility issues.

Page 8 RELEVANT POLICY Policy G-29 It shall be a policy of Council to permit reasonable uses of outdoor lighting for nighttime safety, utility, security, and enjoyment while preserving the ambiance of the night. Policy G-30 It shall be a policy of Council to prohibit outdoor lighting that is misdirected, excessive, or unnecessary. Policy G-31 It shall be a policy of Council to require that all outdoor lighting fixtures in or abutting a residential zone or designation be full cut-off fixtures approved by the International Dark Sky Association. Policy G-35 It shall be a policy of Council to require that all development proposals or other proposals that may impact upon vehicle access to a public street be subject to the approval of the Town s Traffic Authority. Policy IN-34 It shall be a policy of Council to require that all new construction that is subject to a development agreement, to submit a Storm Water Management Plans for the development, either as a condition of approval or for Council s consideration as part of a development agreement application. Policy E-10 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage development that either maintains or enhances the pre-development hydrologic regime through innovative site design and engineering techniques aimed at infiltrating, filtering, evaporating, harvesting and retaining runoff, as well as preventing pollution. Policy E-11 It shall be a policy of Council to adopt performance standards for each land use zone that specifies a maximum percentage for impervious surface. Development that exceeds the maximum percentage of impervious surface will be permitted, up to a specified limit, where development implements on-site stormwater retention and maximizes infiltration by incorporating design elements such as: a) permeable pavement; b) infiltration trenches/chambers and bio-retention; c) rainwater harvesting systems in building design; d) green roofs; e) roof drains directed to permeable areas with stormwater infiltration measures in place; and f) utilizing open drainage such as swales. Policy E-13 It shall be a policy of Council to encourage the use of existing natural drainage systems where possible. Policy E-14 It shall be a policy of Council to, where requested by the Town Engineer, require that a grading and stormwater drainage plan be submitted as part of any new multiple lot subdivision or large development.

Page 9 RELEVANT POLICY Policy IM-19 It shall be a policy of Council to require the submission of a detailed proposal as part of any development agreement application. The proposal shall include any information or materials required by Council in order to effectively evaluate the submission. The submission shall be accompanied by professionally prepared plans that effectively illustrate the proposal and include details such as, but not necessarily limited too, the following: a) the location, area, and dimensions of the subject property based on a survey or location certificate prepared by a licensed surveyor.; b) elevation drawings of the proposed structure or structures; c) the proposed location, dimensions, height, and proposed use of all buildings; d) the means by which the site is to be serviced by sanitary and storm sewers, water, electrical service and other utilities; e) the proposed location and nature of any outdoor storage or display; f) the proposed location, design, and content of any signage; g) the proposed location and dimensions of any parking stalls, driveways, and walkways; h) the proposed location of any fencing, refuse containers, and snow storage; i) the proposed location and type of any exterior lighting, j) the proposed location of any outdoor amenity space; k) landscaping elements including the type and location of any existing and proposed trees or other vegetation; l) architectural features including type of materials, m) the location of any watercourses on or near the site; n) existing and proposed drainage patterns including any stormwater management measures; o) the delineation of any 1:20 and 1:100 flood elevations and a description of any proposed floodproofing measures; and p) any proposed phasing of the development. Policy IM-20 It shall be a policy of Council to require the submission of additional information to address issues such traffic impact, stormwater management, landscaping, servicing, heritage preservation, and impact on the streetscape where Council considers this information to be pertinent to the development process. This information may be required prior to Council s approval or as a condition of approval and required prior to issuance of any development permit. Policy IM-21 Where a structure proposed as part of a development agreement application raises concerns with respect to compliance with the National Building Code, it shall be a policy of Council to require that the applicant submit conceptual building plans for review by the Town s Building Inspector.

Page 10 RELEVANT POLICY Policy IM-22 When considering a development agreement application it shall be a policy of Council to have regard for the following matters: a) compatibility of the proposed land use with adjacent land uses; b) compatibility of the development with adjacent properties in terms of height, scale, lot coverage, density, and bulk; c) compatibility of the development with adjacent properties in terms of lighting, signage, outdoor display, outdoor storage, traffic, vehicle headlights, and noise; d) the adequacy of sewer services, water services, waste management services and storm water management services; e) that the proposal contributes to an orderly and compact development pattern that makes efficient use of existing and new municipal infrastructure and services; f) the adequacy and proximity of schools; g) the adequacy and proximity of recreation and community facilities; h) the adequacy of the road network in, and adjacent to, or leading to the development; i) the potential for the contamination or sedimentation of watercourses or for erosion; j) environmental impacts such as air and water pollution and soil contamination; k) previous uses of the site which may have caused soil or groundwater contamination; l) suitability of the site in terms of grades, soil and bedrock conditions, location of watercourses, marshes, swamps or bogs; m) the ability of emergency services to respond to an emergency at the location of the proposed development; n) the application of sustainable and energy efficient design principles; o) that the proposal is in conformance with the intent of this strategy and with the requirements of Town By-laws and regulations other than the Land Use By-law; p) the financial ability of the Town to absorb any costs relating to the amendment. Policy IM-34 It shall be a policy of Council to consider scheduling an evening public hearing and to consider holding an advertised public information meeting where there is a great deal of public opposition or concern regarding a development proposal or amendment application. The cost of advertising these meetings shall be the responsibility of the applicant.