Acknowledgement: Ralph Prahl, Prahl & Associates, contributed critical review and analysis

Similar documents
RESIDENTIAL DEEMED SAVINGS REVIEW

Kimberly Rollins, Professor, Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Reno

Time-Based Scheduling of Residential Ventilation

Mechanical System Redesign. Dedicated Outdoor Air System. Design Criteria

Laboratory Evaluation of Hybrid and Advanced Water Heaters: Performance Overview in Hot Humid Climate

Sivu 2/8 Rate data Description Suomi Shut off times total 0.0 h/day Weekends with shut off times yes Daytime rate of heat pump Time for daytime rate 5

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Saying Mahalo to Solar Savings: A Billing Analysis of Solar Water Heaters in Hawaii

Remodeling Market. Kermit Baker. Remodeling Futures Conference November 9, Harvard University JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES

Cork County Energy Agency

Performance of Solar Water Heating Systems in the United States

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

Practical and Effective Approaches to Residential Ventilation for Production Builders

Countywide Recycling and Disposal Facility Weekly Progress Report 08/22/08

New Westminster Downtown Parking Strategy Public Open House #1 September 13, 2012

Heat Consumption Assessment of the Domestic Hot Water Systems in the Apartment Buildings

MSP WRAP-AROUND MULTIPLE SMALL PLATE DEHUMIDIFICATION TECHNOLOGY VS. CONVENTIONAL DEHUMIDIFICATION IN DEDICATED OUTDOOR AIR SYSTEMS (DOAS)

Copyright 2003 IBACOS, Inc. All rights reserved.

Indoor Moisture Control of Auckland Houses with Different Ventilation Systems

National Grid Residential & C&I Active Demand Reduction Demonstration Projects. MA EEAC March 15, 2017

National Grid Residential Active Demand Reduction Demonstration Project. MA EEAC Demand Reduction Sub-Committee February 23, 2017

MILK DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

Continuous Commissioning: A Valuable Partner to Retrofit Projects

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

Strategies for Summer Utility Savings. Residential Environmental Program Series May 15, 2013

Analogue to Digital Telecare. Technical Advisory Board. 21 st June 2017 Work Stream 3 Procurement

Dehumidification: Energy Efficiency Comparisons

INEEL (1500) [45] 5.6 C 217 mm 60. Precipitation (mm) Temperature (oc) Month

Biosolids Dewatering, Monitoring, and Disposal Programs

MEASURED PERFORMANCE DATA FOR

VARIABLE HEAT RECOVERY IN DOUBLE BUNDLE ELECTRIC CHILLERS. Richard J Liesen 1, Rahul J Chillar 2 1 University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

Sustainable Hot Water: Better Design, Delivery, and Use

ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF HOUSES AND LIFESTYLE IN COLD CLIMATIC AREA OF JAPAN

Facilities Planning & Construction Report nd Quarter Ending December 31, 2016

Estimated Household Water Heater Energy Use, Running Costs and Emissions, Victoria. Based on energy price projections,

SOUTHEND CARELINE ANNUAL REPORT

Hot Water a Hot Commodity Better Buildings by Design, February 2012 Burlington, VT

Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

Understanding Surface Water Runoff at Breneman Farms

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Heat Pump Water Heater Technology Development. EEBA High Performance Home Summit Ed Vineyard Oak Ridge National Laboratory

WLAC Facilities Committee Meeting. September 18, 2017

Energy Efficient Measures That Add Little or no. Program Lights & Appliances: How To Benefit from the Low-Hanging Fruit

The Ad-Hoc Passive House. Paul W Panish

SOLAR HOT WATER AND HEAT PUMP BOOSTER ENERGY CALCULATION METHODOLOGY

MAINTAINING A HEALTHY, COMFORTABLE, INDOOR ENVIRONMENT

Residential Structure Match or Lighter Ignited Fires

Generation gap: How baby boomers and millennials stack up in their perceived and actual electricity use. Report. March 2019 BCH19-217

A Profile of a Refrigerator Recycling Program

Wisconsin s Annual Potato Meeting, Stevens Point, WI - February 14-16, 2006 Page 1

I always use CTR No problems Helpful staff

Aalborg Universitet. CLIMA proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress volume 3 Heiselberg, Per Kvols. Publication date: 2016

Rt 29 Solutions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel. September 14, 2017

Rt 29 Solutions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel. September 28, 2017

January 2018 Courses Hours Section # Fee Dates Times* February 2018 Courses Hours Section# Fee Dates Times* March 2018 Courses Hours

Simple Steps, Smart Savings

Identification of Aberrant Railroad Wayside WILD and THD Detectors: Using Industry-wide Railroad Data. June 10, 2014

Lifestyle Electric Thermal Radiator

Lifestyle Electric Thermal Radiator

DISTRICT HEATING SCHEME FEASIBILITY STUDY FRANKTON FLATS QUEENSTOWN

The Remodeling Market

Daikin Altherma Selection Report

January 2019 Courses Hours Section # Fee Dates Times* February 2019 Courses Hours Section # Fee Dates Times*

Efficiency Maine. Appliance Rebate Program Evaluation Overall Report FINAL

Tysons-Old Meadow Road Bike/Ped Improvements

The Ed Roberts Campus Berkeley, CA

Modelling Appliance Loads in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings

Evaluating Moisture Control of Variable Capacity Heat Pumps in Mechanically- Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Homes.

Energy & Water Savings in Commercial Food Service

Air Conditioning Inspections for Buildings Efficiency of Air Conditioning Systems

Irrigating Olives. Janet Caprile UCCE Farm Advisor Alameda & Contra Costa Counties

Monthly Report for January 2016

SMALL MOTOR CONTROLLERS

Cool Savings Program Report

URBAN DESIGN LONDON TRAINING PROGRAMME UDL are pleased to present our programme for April 2013 to March 2014.

Boulder County Comprehensive Drilling Plan Surface Owner Meeting. Thursday, Oct. 19, 2017

Estimating the Level of Free Riders in the Refrigerator Buy-Back Program

Monthly Report for October 2015

Keep your electricity bill cool this summer

Monthly Report for October 2015

Dehumidification and Subslab Ventilation in Wisconsin Homes

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

SF REC & PARK MOSCONE RECREATION CENTER: EAST SITE. Supervisor Mark Farrell District 2. Project Manager Dan Mauer Recreation and Parks Department

announcements 4/10/08

IES Whole-Building Energy Model Baseline Energy Model Input/ Output Report. East Liberty Presbyterian Church East Liberty Presbyterian Church

RenewableEnergy. A Guide to Prepare for a Grain Dryer Energy Audit. Introduction. Fueling and Feeding America Through Renewable Resources

Bench Top Production Hydroponic Production

Boulder County Comprehensive Drilling Plan Surface Owner Meeting. Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017

K.F. Fong *, C.K. Lee, T.T. Chow

MASTER PLAN KICK-OFF Open House #1A, April 28, 2015

Design and Operation of a Conditioning Energy Recovery Ventilator (CERV) for Passive Houses

WCROC Dairy Baseline Energy Audit And Energy System Optimization

Food Control Plans or National Programmes Cold Hold Records 2019

Better Buildings By Design 2013 Building the Renewable Energy Ready Home Solar Thermal Lessons Learned and Results

Water and Waste Department Service des Eaux et des Déchets

TRAINING SCHEDULE. Peachtree City, Georgia Course Schedules for 2018

DRAFT: NOT FINAL DESIGN

Zero Net Energy Retrofit Projects The Domes Final Performance Assessment & Verification

Housing and Plug Load Trends: Updates from the Residential Energy Consumption Survey

Transcription:

Subject Focus on Energy Evaluation Dehumidifiers Deemed Savings Review for Targeted Home Performance with ENERGY STAR To Oscar Bloch, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin cc Suzanne Harmelink, Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation From Ron Swager, Patrick Engineering Lark Lee, PA Consulting Group Date March 19, 2009 Acknowledgement: Ralph Prahl, Prahl & Associates, contributed critical review and analysis The Targeted Home Performance with ENERGY STAR (THP) program manager reported in evaluation interviews that the program is considering adding ENERGY STAR replacement dehumidifiers as a new approved energy conservation measure. This is based on anecdotal information from the field that several of THP participant homes have old, inefficient dehumidifiers in their basements. The program design is to replace dehumidifier for eligible homeowners with program funds when the following criteria are met: Existing unit is functional and necessary for moisture control Existing dehumidifier is not ENERGY STAR. This memorandum presents the results of a deemed savings review conducted for dehumidifiers by evaluators. The purpose of the deemed savings review is to estimate the increased deemed energy savings that could be attributable to these appliances being included in the program. The study found that dehumidifiers are more than twice as common in Wisconsin than in the US as a whole. The study s analysis estimates the deemed energy savings for replacement ENERGY STAR dehumidifiers at 90 kwh/year and 0.098 kw/unit. This is the evaluation team s best estimate of what the might achieve before any program-specific data is available. In addition, the study found that the dehumidification load in Wisconsin peaks fairly strongly in the summer. Overview of Dehumidifiers The 2005 Residential Energy Survey i found that dehumidifiers were used in 28.2 percent of all households in the East North Central States. The East North Central States includes Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. Nationwide, the share of households This report is the property of the state of Wisconsin, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and was funded through the Wisconsin Focus on Energy Program.

- 2 - with dehumidifiers was only 11.7 percent. In Wisconsin s region, dehumidifiers are used primarily in basements in the summer months. Average annual usage Table 1 below summarizes the annual usage of dehumidifiers based on several studies and sources. Unfortunately, none of the studies is based on metered data. The studies rely on power measurements and assumptions regarding usage to derive the annual energy consumption values. Table 1. Dehumidifier Annual Usage Data ii Study/Source Annual Energy Use (kwh) Power Use (Watts) Operating Hours /Year LBNL (1992) iii Average: 400 Range: 200 1000 NA NA ADL (1998) iv Average: 972 Average: 600 1620 LBNL (2005) v Range: 500 4650 Range: 520 710 1620, 4320 Energy Center of Average: 600 Average: 350 Range: ± 250 Wisconsin (2005) vi Range: ±300 (WI only) NA Central Maine Power vii Co. (2006) Average: 540 (Maine only) NA NA ENERGY STAR Fact Sheet (from website, 2006) viii ENERGY STAR Calculator (from website, 2006) ix ENERGY STAR: 2161 Non-ENERGY STAR: 2378 ENERGY STAR: 937 2061 Non-ENERGY STAR: 1022 2616 ENERGY STAR: 1334 Non-ENERGY STAR: 1368 1620 ENERGY STAR: 329 723, Non-ENERGY STAR: 358 918 2851 The Department of Energy (DOE) 2 reports that during rulemaking the Association of Home Appliances Manufacturers (AHAM) commented that it is not aware of any data related to the typical annual hours of operation for dehumidifiers. In consultation with manufacturers and others familiar with the product, AHAM and some of the sources identified in Table 1 provided estimates of typical dehumidifier usage in monthly and annual operating hours. Table 2 summarizes the monthly usage data.

- 3 - Table 2. Dehumidifier Monthly Usage (Hours of Operation) Source Jan Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual AHAM Low 0 0 70 210 245 245 70 35 0 875 AHAM Mid 0 14 86 231 288 288 130 58 0 1095 AHAM High 0 37 110 256 329 329 183 73 0 1315 ADL* 0 0 180 360 360 360 180 180 0 1620 ENERGY STAR # 0 0 475 475 475 475 475 475 0 2851 1 LBNL-High 1080 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 720 4320 * Based on peak dehumidification period of three months (at 360 hours/month) with half the usage (180 hours/month) during the remaining three months. # Based on six-month operation with 0.66 duty cycle. Monthly operation equal to ADL peak dehumidification period. Because of the wide variation in estimated annual operating hours, it was decided to compare the various estimates with Wisconsin weather data on humidity from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) x. NOAA calculates an index from the outdoor humidity records, akin to heating and cooling degree days, referred to as the average latent cooling (drying) load (ALCL). It provides a measure of the raw energy necessary to reduce outside air humidity levels to indoor levels of 60 percent relative humidity at 75 F during the cooling season. While this index cannot be directly related to average dehumidifier operating hours due to complications from varying infiltration rates, internal moisture gains and contributions by air conditioning systems, it can provide a measure of seasonal demand. Table 3 summarizes the data available for Wisconsin. Table 3. Average Latent Cooling (Drying) Load (BTU/cfm) Eau Claire Green Bay La Crosse Madison Milwaukee WI Average January 0 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 0 March 0 0 0 0 0 0 April 7 6 14 7 11 9 May 377 404 712 458 419 474 June 1667 1675 2876 1989 1905 2022.4 July 4475 4484 6680 5134 5366 5227.8 August 3587 4279 6051 4526 5366 4761.8 September 1085 1243 1871 1436 1820 1491 October 40 43 62 55 69 53.8 November 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 December 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 This savings number is from the EERE LCC calculator spreadsheet for dehumidifiers. The URL is http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/dehumidifiers.html. It provides a variety of usage scenarios.

- 4 - Upon comparison (illustrated in Figure 1), it was observed that the dehumidification load in Wisconsin peaks more strongly in the summer that the estimated operating hours in Table 2 would indicate. To develop an estimate of operating hours for Wisconsin, we calculated the average of the peak, monthly operating hours of all the estimates (343 hours/month) and adjusted it monthly based on the Wisconsin average ALCL. The results of this calculation are shown in Table 4. From Table 4, daily operating hours for the peak month would be over 11 hours/day. Figure 1. Dehumidification Demand 6000 500 450 Average Latent Cooling (Drying) Load BTU/cfm 5000 4000 3000 2000 WI avg. dehumidifier load AHAM low AHAM mid AHAM high ADL ENERGY STAR LBNL 400 350 300 250 200 150 Estimated Hours of Operation 1000 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 0 Table 4. Wisconsin Estimated Dehumidifier Operating Hours Wisconsin Average ALCL % of Monthly Maximum Load Climate-weighted Operating hours January 0 0.0% 0 February 0 0.0% 0 March 0 0.0% 0 April 9 0.2% 1 May 474 9.1% 31 June 2022.4 38.7% 133 July 5227.8 100.0% 343 August 4761.8 91.1% 312 September 1491 28.5% 98 October 53.8 1.0% 4

- 5 - Wisconsin Average ALCL % of Monthly Maximum Load Climate-weighted Operating hours November 0.2 0.0% 0 December 0 0.0% 0 Annual 921 This result falls within the range of the other estimates and agrees well with the findings of RECS 2005 that dehumidifiers are used an average 4.9 months a year in the East North Central region. Average annual energy consumption DOE based the annual energy consumption of a dehumidifier on the following equation: DEH ENERGY = CAP (0.473/24) Hours /Eff where: DEH ENERGY = Dehumidifier annual energy consumption (kwh/year), CAP = Dehumidifier capacity (pints/day) 0.473 = Conversion factor for liters in a pint 24 = Number of hours in a day Hours = Annual operating hours Eff = Dehumidifier efficiency (liters/kwh). DOE and ENERGY STAR consider six product classes of dehumidifiers based on their capacity. DOE based the market shares for each of these six product classes on data provided by AHAM xi Table 5. Product Classes and Market Share of Dehumidifiers Product Class (pints/day) Year 25.00 25.01 35.00 35.01 45.00 45.01 54.00 54.01 74.99 75.00 2003 13.4% 21.3% 23.2% 21.8% 19.3% 1.0% 2005 10.0% 23.0% 23.4% 20.3% 22.3% 1.0% 2005 6.4% 25.7% 23.0% 20.5% 23.3% 1.0% Average 10.0% 23.4% 23.2% 20.9% 21.6% 1.0% Using DOE s equation and weighting each class by its market share, we obtain the results shown in Table 6 through Table 9 for the average annual energy consumption and demand savings of conventional and ENERGY STAR dehumidifiers.

- 6 - Capacity Class Table 6. Average Annual Dehumidifier Energy : Conventional Average Capacity (L/day) Annual Operating Hours Conventional Unit Energy Factor xii (L/KWh) Annual Energy (kwh/yr) Market Share Weighted Annual Energy (kwh/unit/year) 1 25 pints/day 9.5 921 1.10 330 10% 33 25 35 pints/day 14.2 921 1.20 456 23.4% 107 35 45 pints/day 18.9 921 1.20 605 23.2% 140 45 54 pints/day 23.4 921 1.23 730 20.9% 153 54 75 pints/day 30.5 921 1.55 755 21.6% 163 75 185 pints/day 61.5 921 1.90 1242 1.0% 12 100% 608 Capacity Class Table 7. Average Annual Dehumidifier Energy : ENERGY STAR Average Capacity (L/day) Annual Operating Hours ENERGY STAR Unit Energy Factor 12 (L/KWh) Annual Energy (kwh/yr) Market Share Weighted Annual Energy (kwh/unit/year) 1 25 pints/day 9.5 921 1.2 303 10% 30 25 35 pints/day 14.2 921 1.4 389 23.4% 91 35 45 pints/day 18.9 921 1.5 484 23.2% 112 45 54 pints/day 23.4 921 1.6 562 20.9% 117 54 75 pints/day 30.5 921 1.6 732 21.6% 158 75 185 pints/day 61.5 921 2.5 944 1.0% 9 100% 518 Capacity Class Table 8. Average Annual Dehumidifier Demand: Conventional Average Capacity (L/day) Conventional Unit Energy Factor (L/KWh) Power kw Market Share Weighted Power, kw 1 25 pints/day 9.5 1.10 0.358 10% 0.036 25 35 pints/day 14.2 1.20 0.495 23.40% 0.116 35 45 pints/day 18.9 1.20 0.657 23.20% 0.152 45 54 pints/day 23.4 1.23 0.793 20.90% 0.166 54 75 pints/day 30.5 1.55 0.820 21.60% 0.177 75 185 pints/day 61.5 1.90 1.348 1.00% 0.013 100% 0.660

- 7 - Capacity Class Table 9. Average Annual Dehumidifier Demand: ENERGY STAR Average Capacity (L/day) ENERGY STAR Unit Energy Factor (L/KWh) Power kw Market Share Weighted Power, kw 1 25 pints/day 9.5 1.2 0.328 10% 0.033 25 35 pints/day 14.2 1.4 0.422 23.40% 0.099 35 45 pints/day 18.9 1.5 0.526 23.20% 0.122 45 54 pints/day 23.4 1.6 0.610 20.90% 0.127 54 75 pints/day 30.5 1.6 0.794 21.60% 0.172 75 185 pints/day 61.5 2.5 1.025 1.00% 0.010 100% 0.563 The difference between the conventional and ENERGY STAR results, 90 kwh/yr and 0.098 kw/unit, provides the evaluation team s best estimate of deemed energy and demand savings for replacement ENERGY STAR dehumidifiers for the program without specific program data. We realize that this estimate may be conservative. We recommend that the program implementer collect a large enough sample of nameplate power consumption and capacity data from the old units that are replaced to develop a more accurate baseline 2. i Energy Information Administration, 2005 Residential Energy Survey, September 2008. ii U.S. Department of Energy, Technical Support Document: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment, November 2007. iii A. Meier, L. Rainer, S. Greenberg, Miscellaneous Electrical Energy Use in Homes, Energy, Vol. 17, No. 5: pp. 509 518, 1992. iv R. Zogg and D. Alberino, Electricity by Small End Uses in Residential Buildings: Final Report, Report to the Office of Building Equipment, U.S. Department of Energy, 1998. v M. McWhinney, A. Fanara, R. Clark, C. Hershberg, R. Schmeltz, J. Roberson, ENERGY STAR Product Specification Development Framework: Using Data and Analysis to Make Program Decisions, Energy Policy, 33 (2005): pp. 1613 1625, 2005. vi Energy Center of Wisconsin. Energy Efficiency and Customer-sited Renewable Energy: Achievable Potential in Wisconsin 2006 2015. Volume II: Technical Appendix, ECW Report Number 236-2, November 2005. vii Personal Communication. John Davoulis, Central Maine Power Company. Telephone call with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, March 1, 2006. 2 Nearly all dehumidifiers have some form of humidistat. If used, it would not operate continuously. If the only control is a full bucket, it still will not operate continuously since most households do not monitor their buckets continuously.

- 8 - viii U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy, ENERGY STAR. Qualified Appliance Savings Fact Sheets, Inputs, 2006. <http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/manuf_res/savingfactsheets_backup_calcs.pdf> Accessed March 8, 2006. ix U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy, ENERGY STAR. Savings Calculator Dehumidifiers (Assumptions), 2006. x U.S. Department of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center, Engineering Weather Data Products, December 1999. xi Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers. AHAM Data on Dehumidifiers for Efficiency Standards Rulemaking, Letter to Building Technologies Program, U.S. Department of Energy, August 23, 2006. xii U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy, ENERGY STAR. Savings Calculator Dehumidifiers (Assumptions), 2008.