Active Neighbourhoods Canada SUMMARY REPORT

Similar documents
Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

City of St. Thomas New Official Plan

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. The Parks, Recreation & Culture Department respectfully submit the following

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

Loebl Schlossman & Hackl

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

Official Plan Review

quarters Building Our Cultural Quarters Together

Chapter 1: Introduction

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Campus Master Plan Stage 3 Stakeholders' Engagement Report

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

A study on the regional landscape planning framework on the relationships between urban and rural areas: case study of Tokachi region, Hokkaido, Japan

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY 2012 Campus Plan Update. Ross Tarrant Architects

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Design Manual. Ann Arbor DDA IDA 2015 Awards Planning Category

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

Moving from Vision to Action

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

planning toronto s downtown Parks and Public Realm Plan Request for Proposals Information Meeting Andrew Farncombe, Project Manager August 19, 2015

Section 1 Introduction

PLAN ON A PAGE SUMMARY

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

PUBLIC REALM STRATEGY

RE-Imagining the Downtown Colorado Springs Master Plan

1.3 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community planning

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

hermitage town center

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

2007 TAC SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORTATION AWARD SUBMISSION. Bridge Over Highway 401 for Pedestrians and Cyclists in Waterloo Region

Route 1 Corridor Study

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Municipal Development Plan 2013

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL. Graniteville TAP: Developing a Community Vision

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Excellencies, Dear colleagues from other agencies and organizations, Ladies and Gentlemen,

section 3: Vision, Values and Goals

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Citizen Engagement for a Sustainable Built Environment

MEMORIAL DRIVE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

A COMMUNITY VISION. For the County of Brant

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Sherri Ferguson. President/CEO Portland Chamber of Commerce. Tennessee Certified Economic Developer Capstone Project

Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards 2016 Queens Quay West Revitalization. Category B: Transportation

WELCOME and introduction

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

1 Welcome! UBC Okanagan Master Plan Update - Open House

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

URBAN DESIGN POLICY DEVELOPMENT STEP 1: BACKGROUND RESEARCH

DOWNTOWN PARKS & PUBLIC REALM PLAN

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Key Themes and Responses May 2016

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

THE FLOUR MILL COMMUNITY FARM

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

c. DTAH Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Coliseum Station Area Area Redevelopment Plan. Public Engagement #1 June 12, 2017

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

Blood Alley Square/Trounce Alley Redesign

Regional Placemaking: Connecting Towns as Places

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR L ARCHE TORONTO

Outline of Presentation

Vancouver. Title of the Initiative. Initiative Duration. Submitted by. Comments by the Jury

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

1. MAKING CHOICES. What kind of city will Toronto be in the 21st century?

- Document 2 - Algonquin Interpretation and The Continuing Conversation toward a Vision for a Revitalized Lansdowne

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

CANADIAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2018_20. Approved by the CSLA Members at the date AGM

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

Rio/29 Small Area Plan. Design Plan & Implementation Framework Open House - January 25, 2018

7Page 91 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 7 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

01 Welcome! About Ontario Shores

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

City Centre Plan. Palmerston North SMALL CITY BENEFITS, BIG CITY AMBITION 2018/21. Te Kaunihera o Papaioea Palmerston North City Council

Chair and Members of the Planning, Public Works and Transportation Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner Policy, MCIP, RPP

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 24, 2017

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Transcription:

Prepared by the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation JUNE 2017 Active Neighbourhoods Canada SUMMARY REPORT OF 4 ONTARIO PROJECTS

Sharing participatory methods in Ontario Active Neighbourhoods Canada (ANC) is a national partnership of organizations bringing participatory planning to 12 communities in Alberta, Ontario and Quebec. ANC works with local partners in each community towards changes in the built environment that encourage: active transportation, active public spaces and active, engaged citizens. Between 2013 and 2017, the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) has worked in depth with 4 Ontario neighbourhoods to test and share participatory tools within a three phase framework (outlined on the right). Blending expert & local knowledge The ANC model rests on the strength of partnerships with organizations that have connections to the grassroots. By bringing together informal residents groups with built environment professionals, we can develop a more holistic understanding of public space and help to determine planning priorities in a proactive way. Ontario THE DONOVAN, GREATER SUDBURY EarthCare Sudbury, City of Greater Sudbury THORNCLIFFE & FLEMINGDON PARK, TORONTO Flemingdon Community Health Centre, STEPS (Toronto Energing Artivists) COUNTY ROAD 21/HIGHLAND STREET, HALIBURTON VILLAGE Communities in Action STEWART STREET, PETERBOROUGH GreenUp, City of Peterborough, B!ke, Trent Community Research Centre, Peterborough County-City Health Unit Phase 1: Understanding The goal of the first phase is to understand the current context of the neighbourhood in order to identify potential improvements and constraints related to mobility. Different data collection methods are used to create a Portrait ; including field surveys, review of existing documentation and consultation activities. Phase 2: Exploring The objective of Phase 2 is to establish a common vision, define priorities for action, and propose solutions that respect the local identity and practices of the neighbourhood. During this phase a Citizens Forum and a Professional Workshop is held. Phase 3: Building Local partners collaborate on a Community Plan outlining goals and design solutions. The plan is used as a tool to strategize and partner with local municipal officials, transit authorities, other levels of government, as well as institutions, retailers and individuals towards the incremental implementation of these goals.

Highlights 4 PROJECTS 39 events/activities 1 Spin-off project 29 Interventions proposed 3 temporary pop-ups tested 12 Conference Presentations & 2 awards 8 Project Reports 13 LOCAL PARTNERS ENGAGED 3 Universities involved 17 student placements 4 additional local funding sources

TORONTO Thorncliffe Park & Flemingdon Park 2014/2015 Thorncliffe and Flemingdon were planned communities, completed in the late 1960 s. These inner suburbs are northeast of the Toronto core and they sit on either side of the Don Valley ravine. Most residents live in towers that overlook the greenery. Thorncliffe and Flemingdon are diverse neighbourhoods that serve as landing pads for new Canadians. Most residents have lower than average income and few have access to automobiles. In Toronto we teamed up with the Flemingdon Health Centre and the STEPS youth program: Toronto Emerging Artivists, as well as a series of ad-hoc partners in an effort to understand the experience of public space in these tower neighbourhoods. Based on the demographics of the neighbourhood we made an effort to reach out to youth & new Canadians as two typically underrepresented groups. Linking local voices with federal spending In Thorncliffe and Flemingdon we hosted extensive engagement activities to collect diverse opinions on travel patterns. We also convened a community mapping team who collected information on the experience of public space. The feedback was summarized in a portrait that was presented to local experts for design ideas. We hosted a series of citizen response kiosks to validate the ideas and created an active neighbourhood plan based on the dialogue. Through establishing connections between residents and city staff, the neighbourhood was recognized as a key location for targeted federal transportation spending. We hosted a young urbanist summer camp and helped residents to paint local murals that highlighted important pedestrian connections to the Don Valley ravine. Finally we obtained additional funding to produce a temporary Town Centre pavilion that was designed by community members through participatory workshops.

Stewart Street Neighbourhood The Stewart Street Neighbourhood is located south of downtown in Peterborough. The historical grid-pattern with short blocks makes it very walkable, however the community struggles with negative perceptions of safety and has been actively trying to make public spaces feel more welcoming. Although many trips in Peterborough are made by car, many residents of Stewart street do not have auto access for a variety of reasons, primarily economic. We teamed up with local environmental NGO GreenUp as well as convening a steering committee with representation from the City of Peterborough, Trent University, B!ke, Peterborough Health Unit and the Trent Community Research Centre. We engaged primarily non-drivers & families with young children to determine how streets and public spaces could better reflect their needs. Building engagement into capital improvements Our goal in this project was to connect an informal group of citizens with a planned capital project on Bethune Street, a collector running through the heart of the Stewart Street Neighbourhood. We held a series of events and carried out community mapping and surveying to determine priorities. Local professionals were gathered in a workshop to brainstorm ideas and then we teamed up with a graduate studio at Ryerson Univerity to further develop the ideas and present them at a Citizens Forum. By producing effective materials and making key connections, we saw the proposals & community-based research recognized in the City s official urban design process. We also plan to replicate this work in other Peterborough neighbourhoods and contributed to the knowledge of participatory practice through a master s thesis at Trent University, completed by an active member of our committee. PETERBOROUGH 2014/2015

County Road 21/Highland Street County Road 21/Highland Street is a road that connects the Village of Haliburton in the municipality of Dysart et al. to nearby towns and recreation destinations. Haliburton is a small town in central Ontario frequented by cottagers and tourists. It has a year-round population of ~17,000 which swells to ~45,000 in the summer. Our partner, Communities in Action (CIA) is a local group working towards a more pedestrian and cycling friendly region. As a county road that moves through a town, CR21/Highland Street has the challenge of acommodating traffic moving through town and also creating a safe and comfortable environment for people using slower modes within town. We engaged primarily people with reduced mobility & high school students to determine how streets and public spaces could better reflect their needs. Envisioning active transportation in a rural setting Our goal in Haliburton was to create a Complete Streets Vision for a 2.5 km study area in Haliburton Village. The main village area currently has a historic, walkable character, however a new area of development has emerged with no accommodations for pedestrians or cyclists. We wanted to develop a plan to connect these two commercial zones and also to strengthen relationships between county and village jurisdictions in the process. We held a series of focus groups in the town, connecting with people in their homes, at their schools and at a local cafe. We produced a multi-stakeholder vision that was validated by community members at the local farmers market. We designed a pop-up street intervention which was installed by our local partners to temporarily reconfigure and study a problematic intersection. The vision will be presented at the local Council and will provide a reference for long-term planning in the Village. HALIBURTON 2015/2016

The Donovan Neighbourhood The Donovan is a neighbourhood northeast of the downtown core in the City of Greater Sudbury. There is a general consensus that the Kathleen Street commercial area constitutes the heart of the community, as it is home to popular commercial destinations and a series of cultural halls for groups that have settled in the Donovan over the years. The small lots and narrow lanes in the Donovan give the neighbourhood an intimate, village-like feeling, while also providing the foundation for an extremely walkable neighbourhood. In Sudbury our lead partner was EarthCare Sudbury, a program of the City of Greater Sudbury. We also had members on our steering committee from the DEWCAN residents organization, the Social Planning Council and the Growth and Development Department at the City. We aimed to engage a broad range of citizens within this diverse neighbourhood. Diverse voices in community improvement planning In Sudbury we conceived our engagement and design work to feed into the creation of an official Community Improvement Plan that the City is plannning to undertake in the near future. We undertook a series of community mapping exercises and carried out extensive surveys to understand the barriers to walking and cycling in the neighbourhood. We also taught school workshops to get kids in the neighbourhood thinking about the future they want to see in their neighbourhood. Our professional workshop convened a wide range of local expertise. Beyond culminating in a vision of targeted design interventions, the process also spurred a number of potential partnerships for creative programming in the neighbourhood. We look forward to seeing the future uptake of this vision. GREATER SUDBURY 2016/2017

Indicators of Success Local Knowledge Our appraoch integrates evidence on health, active transportation and the built environment, with local data on how people travel, how they would like to travel and what they value in local public spaces. This weaves the rich detail of resident experience into a portrait of the community that builds the case for change. Professional Engagement Urban design professionals are valuable partners who contribute skills and expertise to help residents build the community they want to see. By creating links to professional communities we ensure resident experiences can be applied in current practice. These oppourtunities also help us build the profile of participatory planning while sharing the local knowledge produced in each community. Agency & Ownership Long-term success depends on the capacity that we help to create within communities. By approaching activities as opportunities to learn together, we develop collective knowledge. Our goal is to empower residents by providing tools and resources that help them have meaningful impact on the built environment of their neighbourhoods. Uptake The local knowledge contained witihn each Neighbourhood Plan we produced is intended for active use. How these documents become referenced, endorsed or applied in the local municipal context will enable our work to achieve impact through context-sensitive opportunities.

Next Steps We are already starting to see that the Active Neighbourhoods visions are gaining traction and creating positive changes. In Toronto, the Thorncliffe and Flemingdon neighbourhoods have been identified as sites to allocate federal infrastructure funds for cycling improvements. In Peterborough, our local partners have adapted the ANC methodology and have been awarded funding to replicate the project in three new neighbourhoods. The recent presentation of the ANC vision to council in Haliburton Village (Dysart et al) was met with a postive response. We hope to see continued uptake of these visions in the future to guide community improvements and infrastructure. active transportation, active public spaces and active, engaged citizens.