Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

Similar documents
City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Natomas Joint Vision Open Space Plan

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

VANDEN MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Schools Foxboro Parkway

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

VANDEN MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Schools Foxboro Parkway

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

DISCUSSION ON VACAVILLE S2 INVESTORS PROPERTY IN URBAN RESERVE

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Land Use element LAND USE POLICY AREAS ESTATE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL AREAS/RURAL SHELDON AREA OLD TOWN ELK GROVE

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Land Use Element. policy areas are discussed in this Element:

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Olde Towne Vision Plan

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Stafford County Strategic Plans

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

Appendix I-A3 DENAIR COMMUNITY PLAN

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

RRW Stonebrook, LLC Tentative Map Findings

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION AGENDA. City Hall Second Floor Conference Room 9027 Center Street. July 1, :30 PM

The transportation system in a community is an

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

open public hearing and allow public comment request to continue LPA public hearing to January 16, 2014 at 10:30 am

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

III. Design Principles

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

Description of Preferred Alternative

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Inter-Departmental Correspondence

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Joint Meeting City Council and the Plan Commission. September 1st, 2015

4.11 Town Centre Secondary Plan (Former City of Cumberland)

Jackson Highway Master Plans

AGENDA. I. Roll Call Page

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

The Private Role in a Public-Private Partnership. Ask Me Anything Conference May 30, 2018

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

CHAPTER 2: FUTURE LAND USE CONCEPTS

Corridor Identity. Section 9. Introduction. Corridor Guiding Principles

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

Chapter 5: Recreation

Transcription:

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission March 2, 2009

CURRENT APPLICATION General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Specific Plan Appendices Utility Plans Transit/AQ Plans Financing Plan Urban Services Plan Development Agreement (Tier 1) Program EIR FUTURE PLANS County Facilities Master Plan Public Area Landscape Plan Parks and Open Space Plan School Facilities/Finance Plan PROJECT-LEVEL APPROVALS (to be approved by PC/BOS) Phasing Study, to include: Updated Master Plans for Proposed Area of Development Updated Financing and Urban Services Plans to Reflect Actual Costs Project-level Development Agreement (Tier 2) Tentative Subdivision Maps/Design Review Permits Project-level Environmental Review

General Plan Amendment SPSP land use designation on 7,528 acres within plan area on General Plan Land Use Diagram Designates other land SSCI/C as Ag-80

General Plan Amendment Revise Policies in Sections 1 and 3 to allow development of Sutter Pointe Specific Plan Revise Section 9 Rural Communities, Area Plans and Specific Plans Delete South Sutter County Industrial/Commercial Reserve Add Goals, Policies, Findings for Sutter Pointe Specific Plan Adds specific policies about land use, public facilities, infrastructure, planning

General Plan Amendment Update Development Standards Table (lot size, density) Update General Plan Holding Capacity Table (acres, units) Add new GP land use and refer to SP for consistent zoning Revise road segment improvements/functionality to SPSP Revise other sections to conform to substantive changes GPA includes a comprehensive consistency analysis

Questions/Comments on GPA

Sutter Pointe Specific Plan Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) and Design Guidelines

Purpose Land Use and Development Code» Regulations governing development, permitted uses, improvements and construction Design Guidelines» Guidelines for appearance of residential, commercial, mixeduse, employment, public uses, parks, and open spaces Regulation: 10-foot minimum front yard, 12-foot minimum back yard Guideline: Building mass should be broken up by projecting or recessing the walls of the front facade

Land Use and Development Code Functions as County zoning code within Specific Plan area» Replaces current zoning code» Provides more urban development standards County staff will use to review development projects within the Specific Plan area Becomes zoning code for new city upon incorporation» Interim code until general plan and zoning are adopted

Zoning Districts LUDC includes zoning map» 12 zone districts established Development standards by zone district for:» Residential» Commercial» Employment» Parks and Open Space Standards typical of newer suburban b communities Town Center standards typical of main street areas

Use Types LUDC defines 86 use types» Agriculture/Open Space (3)» Civic (12)» Residential (11)» Commercial (46)» Industrial (11)» Transport/Communication (3) Defines uses permitted in each zone district Reinforces desired use mix and function of activity centers

Additional LUDC Provisions Updates County sign ordinance, establishing urban standards» Requires Planned Sign Program for shopping centers Establishes urban parking standards by use type» Higher bicycle parking and storage requirements Establishes design review requirements:» Planning Commission reviews: Multi-family residential projects Individual commercial or mixed-use projects > 65,000 sf Shopping centers» Community Services Director reviews: Individual commercial or mixed-use projects <= 65,000 sf Projects in employment zone districts

Design Guidelines Manual and yardstick for LUDC s design review process» Principles establish design themes» Intent statements describe desired outcomes» Guidelines describe desired character and quality Design guidelines are advisory» Describe desired outcomes» Don t prescribe required methods

Communitywide Design Principles Sustainable design promotes healthy lifestyles l Streets should enhance the community and provide vehicle capacity» Create safe pedestrian environment along Riego Road Identify gateways and use entry signs to establish sense of arrival Provide open space buffers and transition areas Enhanced pedestrian intersections should be clearly marked and visually distinguishable from the pavement A 150 foot open space buffer shall be provided between residential areas and adjacent agriculture

Residential Village Design Principles Create diverse neighborhoods with individual identity but consistent with overall community character Vary form, massing, color, materials, garage placement and facades to diversify neighborhoods Use landscaping to complement architectural styles and increase variety Each block elevation should include at least three different models Homes should be oriented toward the street, with entry areas, windows, porches, and major activity spaces facing the street and pedestrian walkways

Commercial and Mixed-use Design Principles Establish public realm and create an inviting setting for a variety of users Establish distinctive and competitive activity centers accessible to drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists Create a traditional downtown at Sutter Pointe s Town Center Wide sidewalks should be provided to accommodate a range of outdoor public activities along the street

Employment Village Design Principles Provide attractive appearance from the street Arrange circulation and parking to enable safe, convenient and pleasant movement Create formal building entrances with strong relationship to the street Use landscaping to enhance built areas, soften and augment architecture, create identity, and screen/buffer objectionable uses Sidewalks should be provided from each building to the public street system Building entries should provide strong visual identity from the street

Public Use and Park Design Principles Design public buildings and infrastructure facilities to compliment surroundings and convey their civic roles Create high-quality, accessible parks for residents, workers and visitors in all age groups Enhance habitats through open space design Promote public health and community well-being The civic center should be located adjacent to a town square and designed as a landmark Parks should be linked by a network of pedestrian and bicycle paths and sidewalks

Questions and Discussion i

Sutter Pointe Specific Plan Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Public Finance Real Estate Economics Regional Economics Land Use Policy Presented by: Tim Youmans

Financing Public Improvements and Services Public Facilities Financing Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis Urban Services Plan

Overview of Sutter Pointe Public Services and Facilities Analyses Services/Facilities Standards in Comparable Cities Services/Facility Standards Legend Technical Analysis Information Input/Output Specific Plan Service Guidelines Facilities Guidelines Fiscal Impact Analysis Final Urban Services Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan

Public Facilities Financing Plan

Financing Policies Fund major infrastructure t and public facilities required for Sutter Pointe development to proceed using a suitable and appropriate combination of public and private financing. The full costs of on-site and fair share of off-site public infrastructure and public facilities required to support Sutter Pointe will be funded from revenues generated by development in the Specific Plan area.

Elements of the Financing Plan Specific Plan Goals and Policies Infrastructure Master Plans Roadway System Water Service Plan Sewer Service Plan Storm Drain Plan Draft Specific Plan Draft Public Facilities Financing Plan Land Use Plan Transit Plan Draft EIR School Facilities Master Plan Public Area Landscape Plan Parks & Recreation Master Plan County Facilities Master Plan

Summary of Funding Programs Existing County & Special District Fees Sutter Pointe Fee Program Sutter Pointe Mello Roos CFD(s) Developer Funding Matching State Funding/Other

Existing County & Special District Fees Sutter County Processing Fees Sutter County Development Impact Fee Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD) Sewer Fee Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (NBHCP) Fee Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Fee School Impact Fees

Sutter Pointe Fee Program Backbone Infrastructure Roadway Sewer Storm Drainage Water Agricultural Irrigation Dry Utilities Public Facilities Supplemental Schools Sheriff Fire Government Center Corporation Yard Parks Trails Open Space Library Transit

Sutter Pointe Mello-Roos CFD Mello-Roos CFD(s) for infrastructure will be authorized to fund facilities in the Sutter Pointe Fee Program or facilities for existing fee funded improvements (schools, sewer). CFD features will be determined during the formation process. Expecting $370 million in bond proceeds to fund construction of infrastructure.

Developer Funding Provides funding advances before the collection of fees or other revenue sources.

Matching State Funding/Other State Highway Funding Federal/State Transit Funding Schools (State School Bonding Program) Local l Tax Revenue Funding

Funding at Buildout: Total Improvements (2008$) Item Sutter Pointe Fee Program Improvements $1,187.7 1877 M School District Mitigation Fee Revenue $164.9 M Other (State Funding, Private, etc.) Total Funding $355.9 M $1,708.4 M

Infrastructure Funding Sources (2008$) Other Infrastructure t Estimated t Sutter Pointe (State t Funding, Improvements Costs Fee Program Private, etc.) Roadway $474.5 M $264.7 M $209.9 M Sewer $174.9 M $174.9 M $0.0 M Storm Drainage $214.2 M $214.2 M $0.0 M Water $251.2 M $251.2 M $0.0 M Agricultural Irrigation $10.0 M $10.0 M $0.0 M Dry Utilities $44.6 M $44.6 M $0.0 M Total Infrastructure Improvements $1,169.4 169 M $959.6 M $209.9 9 M

Public Facility Funding Sources (2008$) Other Estimated Sutter Pointe School (State Funding Public Facilites Improvements Costs Fee Program Funding Private, etc.) Schools $353.0 M $0.0 0 M $207.0 0 M $146.0 M Parks $62.8 M $62.8 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Trails $5.6 M $5.6 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Open Space $5.2 M $5.2 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Library $4.2 M $4.2 M $00M $0.0 $0.0 0 M Transit $8.0 M $8.0 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Sheriff Sub-Station $10.1 M $10.1 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Fire Stations & Equipment $27.1 M $27.1 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Government Center $13.9 M $13.9 M $00M $0.0 $0.0 0 M Corporation Yard $14.6 M $14.6 M $0.0 M $0.0 M Public Facility Improvements $504.4 M $151.4 M $207.0 M $146.0 M

Fiscal Impact Analysis and Urban Services Plan

Fiscal Impact Analysis and Urban Service Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis Urban Services Plan County Services: General Government Public Protection Health & Sanitation Public Assistance Education CSA Services: Administration Parks & Recreation Law Enforcement Fire Library CSA Services: Road Maintenance Drainage Maintenance Transit Lighting & Landscaping

Key Goals, Policies, and Assumptions Establish level of urban services commensurate with surrounding jurisdictions Maintain positive balance in County s General Fund Limit Special Taxes/Assessments to a rate that is economically feasible given market conditions Back-up funding source will be established to fund any service level shortfalls

County Funding Allocation Policies Countywide services shall be fully funded at all times C t h ll i ll i ti County shall receive all existing Project-area revenues

County-wide Services Building Block Approach Scenario 1: Residential Only Scenario 2: Residential Plus Local-Serving Retail Scenario 3: Scenario 2 plus Regional-Serving Retail Scenario 4: Scenario 3 Plus Office Scenario 5: Scenario 4 Plus Industrial (Buildout)

Annual Fiscal Impact Countywide Services (2008$) Sutter County General Fund Residential Residential Residential, Residential, and and Retail Retail, Office Residential Local-Serving All and and Industrial Only Retail Retail Office (Buildout) Revenues $11.0 M $14.0 M $18.0 M $19.8 M $30.8 M Expenses $10.8 M $11.2 M $11.6 M $13.2 M $17.2 M Surplus/(Deficit) $0.3 M $2.8 M $6.4 M $6.5 M $13.6 M

Urban Services Funding Policies Service levels will be flexible in early years As project builds out, urban service levels will be at Specific Plan goals Tax increment revenues generated by the Project could be used to help fund infrastructure for retail, office, and industrial land uses

Urban Service Providers Administration Parks & Recreation Fire Law Enforcement Library Roads Drainage Transit Landscaping & Lighting County (CSA) County (CSA) or Park & Recreation District County y( (CSA) Sutter County Sheriff (CSA) and California Highway Patrol County Library (CSA) or Library District County (CSA) County (CSA) Yuba-Sutter Transit County (CSA) or Lighting & Landscaping District

Funding Sources County General Fund Road Fund Special Taxes/Assessments User Charges Transportation Development Act (TDA) Developer Shortfall Funding Mechanisms

Funding For Urban Services Annual Gross Project Based Annual Net Special Tax/ Annual Other Funding/ Urban Services General Fund Urban Services Assessment Surplus/ Cost Costs Revenues Costs Revenues (Shortfall) Adjustments

Urban Services Net Annual Cash Flow Summary (2008$) Special Tax/ Net Assessment Annual Surplus/ Other Year Revenue Costs (Shortfall) Funding 2011/12 $0.0 0 M ($0.2) M ($0.2) M $0.2 M 2016/17 $6.1 M ($6.5) M ($0.4) M $0.4 M 2021/22 $11.8 M ($11.8) M ($0.1) M $0.1 M 2026/27 $17.5 M ($16.9) M $0.6 M $0.0 M 2031/32 $23.2 2 M ($22.0) M $1.1 1 M $0.0 0 M

Questions/Comments