Thanksgiving Point Office Site Plan Approval Planning Commission Report

Similar documents
EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

Narcoossee Roadway Corridor

Urban Planning and Land Use

ORDINANCE NO. 14,767

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Application for Site Plan Review

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

Planning Commission Application Summary

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

VILLAGE OF HUNTLEY COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Urban Planning and Land Use

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

Commercial Development Permit Area

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016


REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

City Development Department 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, Colorado FAX

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Urban Planning and Land Use

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1150 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 95 ARTICLE 1150 SITE PLAN REVIEW

3.13. Development Guidelines

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

CHAPTER 11 HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

The transportation system in a community is an

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

The Development Review Process. Presentation to the GSSC IAC

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

Industrial Development Permit Area

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. ITEM NO: 6.a 6.b STAFF: LONNA THELEN

GENERAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS. The following landscape provisions shall be adhered to by all land uses unless otherwise noted:

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

CHAPTER 10 GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

ARTICLE 3 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Required Internal Landscaping Percentage of Ground Cover in Living Materials Percentage of Tree Size

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP HALL SEPTEMBER 19, Members Present Members Absent Others Present

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

Staff Planner Ashby Moss. Location 4752 Virginia Beach Boulevard GPIN Site Size acres AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL

EXHIBIT. PUD Written Description

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

M E M O R A N D U M. Principal Planner. HEARING DATE: March 13, 2018 CASE NUMBER: PC

Development and Engineering Services

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

CONCEPT BRIEF. 101 West Abram Street Arlington, Texas

Major Development Plan

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

SECTION V: DESIGN GUIDELINE EXAMPLES

Urban Planning and Land Use

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

SITE PLAN SUBMISSION AND APPROVAL GUIDELINES

City of Mt. Juliet Planning & Zoning Department. Site Plan Checklist. Site plan cklist v1.18

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

PLANNING COMMISSION. Submitted

M E M O R A N D U M. Consider a recommendation of a site plan for Sherwin Williams, a proposed approximately 4,500 square-foot paint store.

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES

The Highway Overlay District applies to an area within the City of Papillion's zoning jurisdiction described as:

Development Services Staff Report for Design Review Committee

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

URBAN DESIGN GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

Transcription:

Lehi City Planning Commission Staff Report Meeting Date: March 24, 2016 Thanksgiving Point Office Site Plan Approval Planning Commission Report Applicant: Sean Onyon VCBO Architecture Requested Action/Purpose: Approval of a commercial site plan Location: 3201 North Garden Drive (Thanksgiving Point) Project Area: Approximately 12 acres Existing Zoning: Resort Community General Plan Land Use Designation: Resort Community Existing Land Use: Thanksgiving Point Golf Course Driving Range Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: Resort Community South: Resort Community Golf Course/Single family residential East: Resort Community Front Runner right-of-way West: Resort Community Golf Course Date of Last DRC Review: March 16, 2016 Assigned Planner: Planning Commission: City Council: Christie Hutchings Final approval No action required Required Action APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATIONS Section 06.080. Development Approvals and Permits. B. Expedited Site Plan Review Process: Site Plans with a total valuation, including building and all associated improvements, greater than 10,000,000 dollars shall follow the City s standard procedures for review and approval of a site plan including approval by the Planning Commission, following a review by the Reviewing Departments. Section 28.070. Development Standards. Where a Resort Community Zone proposes a mix of recreational and commercial or business park uses, the following development standards shall apply in addition to any other commercial development standards contained in this Code or the Design Standards and Public Improvement Specifications manual: A. Building Design. The proposed structures shall be complimentary to the surrounding architecture in terms of scale, massing, roof shape, and exterior materials. Buildings should not create large bulky masses, but should be scaled down into groupings of smaller attached structures. Buildings adjacent to single family detached units should be limited to 2 stories or 35 feet. B. Parking. Large expanses of asphalt shall be reduced and broken into smaller parking lots. Parking lots shall include ample landscaping to buffer cars from neighboring properties including the use of berms and landscaped islands (see Section 12-090 C). C. Access and Traffic. Adequate vehicular and pedestrian access must be provided. Direct access from an arterial or collector street to the office and professional service uses must be provided. A traffic impact study shall be required as part of the Area Plan, to project auto and truck traffic generated by the uses proposed. D. Roof Design. Flat or low-pitched roofs shall be avoided and rooflines should blend in with surrounding buildings. Roof design may be further defined as part of an approved Area Plan. E. Materials. New buildings should blend with the materials of surrounding buildings. Building materials may be further defined as part of an approved Area Plan. F. Signage. Signage of buildings should be part of a coordinated signage system for the entire Resort development. Signage should help unify the development and provide a positive image. Natural materials such as wood, stone, rock and

metal with external illumination are encouraged. The use of monument signs is also encouraged. The size and location of signage shall conform to the requirements and design guidelines of Chapter 23, Signs, of this Code. G. Lighting. Outdoor lighting should be screened by shields or hoods to prevent glare onto adjacent properties. The intensity of large fixtures should be reduced by utilizing a larger number of smaller light poles of twelve (12) to eighteen (18) feet. Incandescent lights should be used in smaller pedestrian spaces where quality light is especially important. Section 37.010. Commercial Design Standards. A. Architectural Standards. 6. Variation. Commercial buildings shall be designed with architectural wall variations spaced at intervals of thirty (30) to fifty (50) feet in linear width, depending on the size of the project (see Figure 3). At least four (4) or more of the following architectural features shall be incorporated into the design of the building: a change in building materials, building projections measuring at least three (3) feet in depth, roof line variations measuring at least three (3) feet in height, awnings and lighting, or another architectural variation that creates visual interest. 7. Vertical Separation. Buildings in excess of two (2) stories in height shall exhibit architectural detailing that establishes a vertical separation between lower and upper stories. This may be accomplished by a mid-façade cornice or trim, a change in material, style or color, a façade step-back or roof pitch with dormer windows, or other methods. B. Site Design Standards. 1. (a) Buildings shall be oriented to the right-of-way in order to create a streetwall along the street edge with no front yard setback except to allow for some minor landscaped areas, courtyards, plazas, or a drive thru if the site constraints do not allow for an alternative design. HISTORY December 26, 1995 Thanksgiving Point annexation The subject property was included in this annexation and assigned Planned Community zoning. Later the Thanksgiving Point Area Plan was amended and this property was assigned Resort Community zoning. December 10, 2015 The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed concept plan where it was tabled. The following motion was made: Donna Barnes moved to approve VCBO Architect s request for a Concept Plan for Thanksgiving Point Office, proposed office and stake center buildings located at approximately Garden Drive and Desert Forest Lane in a Resort Community zone seeing it would not be detrimental to the safety, welfare or well-being of our community and include DRC comments. Second by Jared Peterson. Motion carried unanimous. ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 4-story, 135,000 square foot office building in the Thanksgiving Point development professional office is classified as a Permitted Use by the Thanksgiving Point Area Plan. The Planning Commission granted concept approval for an office building and church building on December 10, 2015; however at this time, the applicant is only seeking approval for the office building the church building will be submitted for a separate review and Conditional Use approval in the future. The current use of the property is the golf course driving range, which is planned to be moved adjacent to the Children s Museum. (Approval for the new location of the driving range is not included in this request) The office building is oriented towards Garden Drive, with parking on the sides and rear of the building. The previous concept plan showed a pick-up/drop-off area in front of the building, which has now been removed because of conflict with the approved county/udot trail along the frontage. Funding for this project is in place and Utah County owns the right-of-way in front of the project along Garden Drive, and because of potential conflict between the trail users and pick-up/drop-off, the County has not approved the two additional accesses required for the pick-up/drop-off area, thus it has been removed. Although a church building is proposed to be constructed as a future phase, all site improvements, including the parking for the entire project, is being constructed with this phase. As per the Area Plan, a minimum of 4.5 parking stalls are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable space. The proposed building is 98,400 square feet, for a requirement of 443 stalls. There are 494 stalls shown on the proposed site plan. Parking for the future phase will be evaluated at the time of Conditional Use Approval. Additionally, 45 bike parking spaces are being provided for inside the office building.

50% of the site is shown as landscaped, which is in excess of the minimum requirement of 10%. A significant amount of landscaping is located on the south and west boundaries of the project, adjacent to residential and golf course uses, to provide buffering and screening. Proposed building elevations show the use of brick, metal accents and glass with pop-outs, awnings, decorative lighting, roof cantilevers, and a recessed entry for architectural variations. As discussed above, the building orientation is to Garden Drive, in accordance with the Commercial Design Standards from Chapter 37, which aids in pedestrian accessibility which is especially important considering the proximity to the Lehi Front Runner Station. A traffic study has been submitted to the City s Engineering Department, and is currently being reviewed. As per the traffic report, a traffic signal is proposed at 2150 North 2300 West. The developer and staff are currently working with UDOT to coordinate the signal. RECOMMENDATIONS/POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Division Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant approval to the proposed site plan, as the proposed use is a permitted use within the Thanksgiving Point Resort Community, with the condition that the City, the Developer and UDOT come to an agreement regarding roadway and signal improvements that maybe required to mitigate potential traffic issues caused by this development, including all DRC redline comments, and with the following findings: 1. The proposed site plan is not detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of Lehi City. 2. The proposed site plan meets the requirements of the Lehi City Development Code and Thanksgiving Point Resort Community in regards to site plan approval. 3. Other findings based upon information presented during the Planning Commission approval.

Lehi City Development Review Committee March 16, 2016 Thanksgiving Point Office Site Plan DRC Redline Comments VCBO Architecture Requests Site Plan review for Thanksgiving Point Office located at Garden Drive and Desert Forest Lane in a Resort Community zone. (fifth submittal - date of last review 2/24/16) DRC Members Present: Glade Kirkham, Kerry Evans, Greg Allred, Kim Struthers, Gary Smith, Mike Howell, Ross Dinsdale, Craig Barratt Representatives of the Applicant Present: none present Date of Plans Reviewed: N/A Time Start: 10:00 Time End: 10:20 CRITICAL ISSUE: Under current conditions, the circuits feeing the proposed area have no available capacity. Until further review and system improvement are designed and or in place we are unable to serve this project DRC REDLINE COMMENTS: Glade Power: No comments Kerry Fire: 1. Remove the culinary service line and valve off of the fire line off of both buildings (relocate as per Lehi Water Dept) 2. Sheet C300 add a hydrant on the southwest front of the church Greg Water/Sewer: 3. Sheet C301 note #12, irrigation service will be either 2-inch or 4-inch Todd Public Works: No comments Kim Planning: 4. Submit a fully revised site plan with the new trail alignment Gary Building/Inspections: No comments Mike Public Works: No comments Ross Engineering: 5. Continue to work with UDOT and City regarding proposed traffic signal locations Craig Parks: 6. Sheet L-100 bold the point of connection PRIOR TO PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: 1. Provide an engineer s cost estimate for the cost of all improvements. 2. Escrow or Letter of Credit Bond Agreement and Public/Private Improvement Agreement for all public and private improvements must be in place. 3. Surveyor s and engineer s stamps on construction drawings. 4. New project startup form for Lehi City Storm Water 5. Approval from Thanksgiving Point Architectural Review Committee on the design of the building, parking, lighting and landscaping 6. Written/recorded 20-foot easement over the looped PI and culinary line 7. Written/recorded 20-foot sewer access and maintenance easement over the golf cart path and pipe 8. The Thanksgiving Point Architectural Control Guidelines call for 9 x20 size parking stalls with 25 aisles. The site plan either needs to be adjusted to meet these standards or otherwise approved by the Thanksgiving Point ARC. 9. On the future trail that runs along Garden Drive, coordinate with Lehi City and Utah County on the design and construction 10. Under current conditions the circuits feeding the proposed area have no available capacity. Until further review and system improvements are designed and or in place we are unable to serve this project. 11. Provide an approval from Thanksgiving Point allowing the pedestrian connection to the golf course 12. Comments from Planning Commission approval DRC GENERAL COMMENTS: Note: This list of corrections and deficiencies should not be considered as an all-inclusive or final list. The items listed need to be corrected and resolved and a new set of information submitted for review by the DRC. Further corrections and deficiencies may still be noted as the DRC further reviews the resubmitted information. 1 of 2

Lehi City Development Review Committee March 16, 2016 1. A line extension, conduit and equipment will be required for a master plan tie circuit in order to provide adequate service to this project. Lehi Power provided sketch with points of attachment and power infrastructure to be constructed. 2. Developer is responsible to furnish adequate rights of way or easements for construction of off-site power line extensions. 3. Once approved by the Planning Commission or City Council (whichever is applicable) plans may be submitted for checkoff. Check-off plans consist of one 24x36 set of plans submitted to the Planning Department. When changes need to be made to a check-off set, revise the affected sheets only. Each new submittal will require a revision date on each new sheet. 4. Prior to the pre-construction meeting, Lehi City Staff will make copies of plans for the meeting from the check-off set and the developer will pay fees for the copies. 5. The approval of a development shall be effective for a period of two (2) years from the date the development is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council, whichever is applicable. THIS ITEM WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 2016 Note: This list of corrections and deficiencies should not be considered as an all-inclusive or final list. The items listed need to be corrected and resolved and a new set of information submitted for review by the DRC. Further corrections and deficiencies may still be noted as the DRC further reviews the resubmitted information. 2 of 2