Community Open House #2 June 12 th, 2018, 5:30 7:00 PM

Similar documents
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached. resolution accepting the Downtown San Rafael Station Area Plan.

Introduction. Community Outreach Approach. Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. Online Questionnaire Summary of Feedback.

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 12, City of North Las Vegas

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Bus Rapid Transit Backgrounder. December 2016

Union Station Master Plan Task 2 Briefing

Ballston Station Multimodal Study. Stakeholder Meeting October 5, 2010

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

Welcome! Please sign-in and participate in the activities in the registration area before finding your seat. Thank you!

Community Meeting #2.1

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

Key Themes and Responses May 2016

Downtown Langley Transit Exchange Concept Plan

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Citizens Team Workshop Wednesday, February 28 th, 2006 Hillsborough Community College - Brandon

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Colorado Station 2.0

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

Master Plan Goals. 1. Outdoor Exhibition Project Background. 2. Master Plan Goals 3. Research + Site. Analysis. Location Investigation

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

HS2 Interchange Station Design

WELCOME and introduction

Aldershot GO Draft Mobility Hub Concepts. East Plains United Church September 13, :30 8:30 pm

Por favor, levanten la mano si necesita traduccion en espanol Please raise your hand if you need Spanish translation


THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

DESIGN SERVICES FOR BALLSTON- MU METRO STATION AREA IMPROVEMENTS 90% PLAN PRESENTATION: DECEMBER 2015

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Frisco Transit Center Design Charrette. 2-Apr-2015

Public Meeting March 10 th 2011

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

CITY S GOALS DRIVE MODE CHOICE IN WINSTON-SALEM, NC

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Public Art Guidelines And Public Art Donation Program

Walnut Creek BART Station

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

Community Meeting #1: Project Kick Off

Future Proposed Development

London s Bus Rapid Transit System

What s Up Next In The Seattle Squeeze. PSRC Transportation Policy Board April 11

The Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan. The LiNC

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

The Village of Shirlington

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

Overview. Have your say. Distributed sites network key objectives. Planning vision. QUT Draft Estate Master Plan. Facilities Management

Summary of Results from the Toronto Planning Review Panel Meeting held June 10, 2017 Executive Summary

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER

One said, without a clear understanding of what will be annexed, this is an exercise in futility.

FANSHAWE PARK ROAD/RICHMOND STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 2 June 16, 2016

Program Schedule, Budget and Scope

East Central Area Plan

Millbrae TOD #2 Project Analysis

Century Park to Ellerslie Road Preliminary Engineering

Mount Pleasant Comprehensive Plan Public Open House Meeting. June 5, 2018

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Attachment B Summary of Plan Alternatives Report

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

Expo Light Rail Line. Expo Line Community Meeting Phase 2 Design Update November 2011

The George Washington University Streetscape Concept Plan. May 6 th 2009 Public Presentation for Discussion EHRENKRANTZ ECKSTUT & KUHN ARCHITECTS

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Smart Growth and TOD Land Use (#11) SAWG Meeting

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

D2 Subway Project Development. Public Meeting September 12, 2018

Planning Commission Report

THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

1. Creating a liveable, vibrant, safe and inclusive city centre for the benefit of people of all ages to live, work, learn and enjoy.

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

FROM DUPONT CIRCLE NORTH TO CALIFORNIA STREET, NW. Welcome!

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

Agincourt Mall Planning Framework Review Public Open House #2 Consultation Summary

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES 2012 TAC Sustainable Urban Transportation Award Submission BACKGROUND MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

WEST BLACKHALL STREET PUBLIC REALM + TOWN CENTRE CONNECTIONS Public Exhibition 28 th June 2018

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

SBPO BOARD MEETING MARCH 20, 2018

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Relief Line Project Assessment

Northwest LRT Downtown to. Northwest Edmonton Study. Public Workshops

UNION STUDIO Greater Kennedy Plaza!

Transcription:

Community Open House #2 June 12 th, 2018, 5:30 7:00 PM Raymond Santiago, GGBHTD Project Manager Consultant Team: Adam Dankberg, Kimley-Horn and Associates Lisbet Sunshine, Civic Edge Consulting 1

Open House Agenda Welcome Brief Presentation Project Background and Purpose Concept Development Summary of Concepts Feedback and Discussion 2

Project Process 3

Project Schedule 4

What Services are Available at the Transit Center? 5

How is the Transit Center Used? 9,000 daily bus boardings and alightings Over 500 bus trips a day Start and end point for many riders trips 6

Previous Outreach Open House held March 20 th, 2018 Online survey open March 20 th through May 1 st 206 responses 7

March 20 th Open House Community Priorities: Pedestrian access Enhance bicycle connectivity Ease of transferring between different bus routes Provide a safe and comfortable facility for users Ease of transferring to and from SMART Provide flexibility to meet future transit needs 8

March 20 th Open House Design Priorities Real Time Information Enhanced Weather Protection Bike Share Engage with 4 th Street Memorable Plaza and Paving Elements Green Spaces 9

Online Survey Results When considering where to put a new transit center and what it should look like, how important are the following factors to you? 1. Having a safe transit center 2. Pedestrian access to the transit center 3. Minimizing impacts to surrounding vehicle traffic I would use transit more, or my transit experience would be better, if the transit center: 1. Had better waiting areas 2. Is located in a more easily accessible location by foot 3. Is located in a more easily accessible location by car 10

Purpose & Need A Purpose & Need statement is required for the environmental process A project s Need is an identified deficiency or problem A project s Purpose is the set of objectives that will be met to address that deficiency 11

Project Purpose Improved transit connectivity Enhance local and regional transit use into a hub which affords transit users the safest, most efficient means of using bus and rail services Efficiently accommodate transit users and services and reduce operating costs and improve transit desirability Design a functional, attractive, cost-effective facility that can meet longterm projected service levels and be implemented in an expeditious manner Provide a secure, safe, and inviting space for transit patrons Create a more accessible transit facility for all users Provide convenient pedestrian connections to surrounding land uses 12

Project Need The SMART extension to Larkspur will cut through the Transit Center and result in the loss of some essential facilities Address near-term and long-term transit needs while improving the desirability and usability of transit To the extent feasible, minimize traffic congestion and facilitate smooth transit operations while also promoting pedestrian safety 13

Design Considerations Transportation System Operations Improve traveler safety, convenience and connectivity between all modes: bus movements, bus transfers, bicycle/pedestrian access, SMART, and passenger pick-up/drop-off Universal Design Develop access to transportation services through universal design, consistent with user expectations and intuition with a focus on accessibility, wayfinding, and safe and clear paths of travel, limiting the need for special accommodations 14

Design Considerations (cont.) Placemaking Create a welcoming, attractive, memorable, vibrant place for all users that includes design elements that help incorporate the facility into San Rafael s urban fabric Sustainable Design Improve storm water treatment, energy efficiency, and other sustainability goals using durable and environmentally-sound materials. Durability and Maintenance Consider safety, cleanliness, and long-term maintenance needs in design 15

Design Requirements - Facilities Bus bays 17 bays, matching current transit center Customer waiting areas Customer service in close proximity Wayfinding and transit information Bike parking Pick-Up/Drop-Off curb space for taxis and TNCs Security and lighting Operator facilities 16

Concept Development Process Identify sites that are capable of meeting the program and meet the transfer needs of patrons Assess bus routing and circulation that allows for bus access/exit Delineate space for pedestrian and bicycle circulation internally and externally Identify opportunities for supportive uses, urban design, and placemaking components 17

Understanding Trade-offs Smaller sites may be lower cost with less impact Sites closest to downtown provide best access for patrons Consolidated sites make transfers and wayfinding easier Larger sites can reduce bus movements on City streets Sites closest to downtown may introduce more conflicts for pedestrians Consolidated sites may have greater effect on City streets to facilitate bus routing 18

Study Area 19

Concepts for Input 20

Two-Story Concept Lower Level Upper Level 21

Across the Freeway Concept 22

Across the Freeway Concept Hetherton Shift Option 23

4 th Street Gateway Concept 24

Whistlestop Block Concept 25

Provide Feedback on Concepts We have listed pros and cons for these concepts which of these are the most important to consider? Add dots next to the pros and cons What do you like about these concepts? Add a post-it note What would you change about these concepts? Add a post-it note 26

Opportunities for Public Input Four phases of public engagement 1. Listening (March 20 th Open House) 2. Input on Specific Concepts (Current Phase June 12 th Meeting) 3. Identification of Alternative(s) for Environmental Analysis 4. Share Findings of Environmental Analysis A combination of open houses, smaller-scale meetings, online forums, stakeholder engagement, and presentations to agency boards/committees 1 2 3 4 27

Project Contact Information E-mail: SRTC@goldengate.org Phone: (415) 257-4444 (dedicated project line) View our website at: goldengate.org/srtc Take our survey: http://bit.ly/srtcsurvey 28