Parking Garage Site Selection Committee Final Report October 15, 2012

Similar documents
Historic District Commission Staff Report May 3 rd, 2017

Historic District Commission Staff Report February 1 st, 2017

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

CITY OF FARGO PARKING RAMP SITE EVALUATION

Historic District Commission

Southern Gateway Project and Public Green

Historic District Commission

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project

Historic District Commission

D2 Subway Project Development. Stakeholder Committee October 24, 2018

Historic District Commission Staff Report March 2 nd, 2016

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

REBUILD GUTTER AND ROLLED CURB TO MATCH EXISTING DETAIL. (TYPICAL) REPAIR EXISTING BENCH FINISH. RETURN TO EXISTING LOCATIONS.

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 3 Urban Design

The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program

appendix and street interface guidelines

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

Phase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting

A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006

Glen Road Pedestrian Bridge Environmental Assessment

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

Naomi Weiss, Executive Director, DBPA Jason Jeffries, Project Manager, City of Daytona Beach

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

Historic District Commission Staff Report September 7 th 2016

1 Welcome! UBC Okanagan Master Plan Update - Open House

Sketch Plan. MNCPPC Plan No: A

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

CALL FOR ARTIST QUALIFICATIONS SUBMISSIONS. DIA Urban Arts Projects Phase One

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

Seattle Transit Master Plan

MALL REVITALIZATION CASE STUDIES

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. MTA Board Meeting May 6, 2014

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

Good Neighbor Plan Dallas Love Field Airport Transportation and Environment Committee

GOODY CLANCY WITH KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES RHODESIDE & HARWELL FARR ASSOCIATES W-ZHA

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014

Place-Making Portsmouth

Kenilworth Avenue and Town of Cheverly Industrial Study Briefing

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER

CITIZEN S ADVISORY COMMITTEE PUBLIC REALM CONCEPT PRESENTATION. October 25, 2018

GORDON ROAD TRIANGLE ULI mtap Spring 2015

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

c. DTAH Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN

Community Open House #2 June 12 th, 2018, 5:30 7:00 PM

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT AREA

The following concept plans and illustrations are the result of this 10 month study of the alley connections from CSU to the River District.

South Yonge Street Corridor

Sherwood Forest Park REVITALIZATION PLAN. Public Meeting (P.I.C) # 3 JUNE / 25 /2015

THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

Union Station Master Plan Task 3 Update

New Town Mixed Use District

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

PORT CLINTON DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN

AGINCOURT SECONDARY PLAN

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Stuart Street Planning Study Development Review Guidelines to supplement Back Bay Downtown IPOD (1987) October 15, Preface

SITE FEASIBILITY TEST FIT LAYOUT NORTHERN AREA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL DECEMBER 2016

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Oroville Area Urban Greening Plan. Joint Meeting of the Oroville Planning, Park, and Arts Commissions October 12, 2015

North Commuter Parkway and Traffic Bridge Project Market Sounding

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Welcome. Green Line LRT. Beltline Alignment Options. Stay engaged! Follow the Green Line story at calgary.ca/greenline

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Pace University Land Use and Sustainable Development Conference Tensions and Opportunities in Urban Revitalization

Beyond the Commute. Presented by: L. Dennis Burns, CAPP Green Gov Symposium, October, 2010 Washington, DC

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

Request for Proposals For the purchase and redevelopment of Cityowned property in the Historic Downtown. 109 South Boyd Street

Nassau County Cultivating Opportunities for Sustainable Development Nassau County Infill Redevelopment Feasibility Study

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Project Background PROJECT CONTEXT Background The Capital City Downtown Plan...

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

DATE: October 25, Park, Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee (PROSAC) Jordan Harrison, Planner III, RPD Planning Division

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

UCSF Parnassus Heights Re-Envisioning Process

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

Transcription:

Parking Garage Site Selection Committee Final Report October 15, 2012

Executive Summary Recommend a Short-List of Sites for Further Review: 1. Explore the Possibility of a Private/ Public Partnership 2. Identify and Address Issues of Opportunity and Concern with Stakeholder Groups

Overview 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Parking Supply and Demand Methodology and Approach Goals and Objectives Sites Selected for Evaluation Site Evaluation Criteria Recommendations

1. Parking Supply and Demand Previous Parking Studies: Recent Development Activity: Portwalk Project Phase 1 & 2 51 Islington Street Phase 1 319 Vaughan Street Pending Development Activity: Downtown Parking Study (1998) Downtown Parking Focus Group Report (2010) Parking Supply & Demand Report, Nelson/ Nygaard (2011) Portwalk Project Phase 3 30 Maplewood Ave. 233 Vaughan Street Future Development Activity: Connie Bean Center McIntyre Building 111 Maplewood Ave.

2. Methodology and Approach 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Refine Key Goals & Objectives Review Past Parking Garage Studies Site Visits Conceptual Site Plans & Renderings Site Evaluation Criteria Assess Pros and Cons Rank and Score Sites Recommend Site(s) for Further Study

3. Key Goals and Objectives Walkability Visual Impact Active Street-Level Uses Leverage into Larger Revitalization Effort Flexibility for Multiple Sites Multi-Modal Facility Public-Private Partnerships Minimize Construction Cost

4. Sites Selected for Evaluation Bridge Street Masonic Lot Deer Street Parrott Ave. McIntyre Lot Worth Lot Court Street Lot

Site 30,000 +/- SF 60+/- Spaces Pros City-owned Proximity to Market Square Cons Soil conditions Narrow shape and small size High visual impacts Potential need to use Bridge Street ROW Bridge Street Lot

Site 32,000 +/- SF 80+/- Spaces Pros City has current use agreement Size and shape of lot Potential for street-level uses Cons Scale and volume structure Removal of large shade tree High visual impacts Proximity to Market Square Masonic Lot

Site 50,000 +/- SF 75+/- Spaces Pros Size and shape of lot Potential for economic development Less visual impact as outside core area of the Historic District Capture traffic prior to entering downtown business district Potential for street-level uses Cons Private ownership Proximity to Market Square Deer Street Lot

Site 75,000 +/- SF 215+/- Spaces (175 public) Pros Size and shape of lot (expanded) Potential leverage for economic development Reduced visual impact with adjacent buildings Potential for street-level uses Proximity to Market Square Cons Private ownership (Citizen s Bank) Potential for high-ground water Potential concerns for traffic safety Parrott Ave. Lot

Site 100,000 +/- SF 80+/- Spaces Pros Size and shape of lot Potential leverage for economic development Reduced visual impact with adjacent buildings Potential for street-level uses Proximity to Market Square Cons Ownership (GSA) Traffic access & circulation McIntyre Lot

Site 60,000 +/- SF 135+/- Spaces (110 public) Pros Size and shape of lot Potential leverage for economic development Traffic access & circulation Reduced visual impact Potential for street-level uses Potential to revitalize the Vaughan Mall Proximity to Market Square Cons Private ownership of abutting lots Temporary loss of spaces during construction Worth Lot

Site 32,000 +/- SF 75+/- Spaces Pros Size and shape of lot Proximity to Market Square Cons Private ownership Traffic access & circulation Proximity to abutting buildings and uses Potential for high ground-water Visual impacts Court Street Lot

5. Site Evaluation Criteria 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Proximity to Market Square Proximity to current/ future development Ability to support multi-modal transportation Ability to leverage economic development Responsiveness to pedestrian & vehicular traffic Availability Level of complexity Visual impacts Net new public parking spaces Efficiency of the site as it relates to cost

1. Proximity to Market Square 55 Minute Minute Walk Walk Area Area

2. Proximity to Current & Future Development Recent Development Pending Development Future Development

3. Support Multi-Modal Transportation Users Passenger Vehicles Public Transit Bicycles Mopeds Segways Electric Cars Pedestrians

4. Leverage New Economic Development New Buildings New Uses New / Reinvigorated Public Spaces Spillover to Abutting Properties

5. Pedestrian and Vehicular Traffic Access Traffic Flows Circulation Patterns Walkability

6. Availability Private Ownership Non-Profit Governmental Agencies

7. Level of Complexity Ownership Design Permitting Construction

8. Visual Impacts Downtown Historic District Height, Volume & Massing Façade Treatment

9. New Net Public Parking Spaces Existing Public Parking Potential Parking Spaces Potential Net New Spaces* Bridge Street 60 200 140+/- Masonic Lot 80 300 200+/- Deer Street 0 600 550+/- Parrott Ave. 175 500 225+/- McIntyre Lot 0 600 400+/- 110 600 400+/- 75 375 300+/- Worth Lot Court Street * Potential spaces minus existing and potential new demand

10. Efficiency for Construction 60 x 200 + Parking Bays Rectangular Site Open Design Minimize Façade Costs Below-Level Parking Option Staging Areas

Site Evaluation Criteria Summary Table Evaluation Criteria Points Bridge Street Masonic Lot Deer Street 1 Proximity to Market Square 0-5 3.50 1.50 3.00 2 Proximity to recent or proposed economic development 0-5 4.25 1.50 3 Potential for multi-modal transportation facilities 0-5 3.50 4 Potential to meet multiple objectives 0-5 5 Pedestrian and vehicular traffic Impacts, access and circulation 6 McIntyre Lot Worth Lot Court Street 3.00 4.75 4.50 4.00 5.00 1.50 3.75 4.50 2.50 3.00 4.25 2.50 3.25 4.50 3.50 1.50 1.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 4.50 2.25 0-10 1.50 5.25 8.25 6.00 7.50 9.50 6.00 Availability of site 0-10 10.00 3.00 3.67 3.00 3.00 4.67 2.00 7 Level of complexity 0-10 5.25 3.75 6.00 3.25 8.75 5.50 3.25 8 Visual impacts and need/ability to screen garage with buildings 0-15 2.00 6.25 8.50 8.50 13.00 13.50 12.25 9 Estimated net gain of public parking spaces 0-15 4.00 6.00 15.00 10.25 14.50 12.75 9.00 10 Estimated construction cost per new parking space 0-20 11.25 11.00 17.00 10.00 18.75 16.00 11.75 0-100 46.75 42.25 74.67 82.25 79.92 56.50 6 7 3 1 2 4 TOTAL SCORE RANKING Parrott Ave. 51.00 5

6. Recommendations Focus on 3 top-ranked sites concurrently Short-Term Worth Lot Long-Term McIntyre and Deer Street Lots

Next Steps Explore public-private partnerships Identify issues, concerns, and opportunities with stakeholder groups