QUEEN S WHARF BRISBANE PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEME AILA COMMENTS

Similar documents
QUEEN'S WHARF BRISBANE PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEME

Inclusive and Engaging City

The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (notified 30 September 2013)

PDA SUBMISSION: Queen s Wharf, Brisbane (DEV2017/846)

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

10.0 Open Space and Public Realm

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

I615. Westgate Precinct

Chapter 5 Urban Design and Public Realm

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Contents of Part 6. Part 6 Zones

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

I539. Smales 2 Precinct

Hobart A Strategic Framework

therry, elizabeth, franklin and queen: BLOCK plan

Central City District What we heard

AOTEA SUPERMARKET ZONE. Zone Introduction

Four Big Ideas. Three Key Opportunities. Principles. Draft Place Making Master Plan. 1. The Foreshore 2. Green Links. 3.

WELLINGTON STREET WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN

3.5 Principle 5/Response

Public Art Plan. We have elected to submit Public Art Plans before or concurrently with the CSP Submittal per the FDP Manual

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

DRAFT GREATER SYDNEY REGION PLAN OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

PUBLIC REALM STUDY AREA

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

PART AOTEA PRECINCT

H7 Open Space zones. (a) provide for the needs of the wider community as well as the needs of the community in which they are located;

2.0 Strategic Context 4

North District What we heard

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW For submission with development proposals in the City s Tourist Area

PHASE ONE. A summary report: What the community told Alcoa during Phase One of the community engagement program for Point Henry 575.

6 Site Framework Strategies

UNIVERSITY TOWN NEIGHBOURHOODS 5.2 ECO-CORRIDOR MELBOURNE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 2014

The Mill at Moreton Bay Priority Development Area Interim Land Use Plan

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Welcome. Community Consultation Meeting November 28, Review and discuss the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan Framework

As will be detailed, our site plays a strategic role in providing these opportunities.

Eastern City District Plan

Part 10 Other plans

Northern Territory Compact Urban Growth Policy

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Memorial Business Park Site. Proposed Future Development. Design guidelines. August

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planning Board Briefing

How can we improve mobility and access?

... on the draft Arden Vision & Framework

Wetland Design Manual. A1: Vision, core outcomes and aspirational outcomes

section THREE: DISTRICTS districts

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

PUBLIC REALM STRATEGY

DAVENPORT VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN

submission_details represented_by_who title age_bracket first_name last_name organisation position_in_organisation withhold_name address_1

CREATE A VIBRANT MIXED-USE COMMUNITY

Vision for Mayfair and Belgravia

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY PLAN

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

A Growing Community Rural Settlement Areas

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

Appendix 1 Structure plan guidelines

Sub-committee on Harbour Plan Review of Harbour-front Enhancement Committee. Ninth Meeting

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Section Three, Appendix 16C Medium Density Housing, Design Assessment Criteria (Residential 8A zone)

McCowan Precinct Plan Study Background & Deliverables

2.0 Urban Design Concepts

submission_details represented_by_who title age_bracket first_name last_name organisation position_in_organisation withhold_name address_1

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Site layout, density and housing type

Draft Eastern District Plan

State Planning Policy state interest guidance material. Liveable communities

REVISED DRAFT NORTH DISTRICT PLAN PLANNING PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS

LIVEABLE. A diverse and welcoming capital city with an enviable lifestyle and strong community. Liveable City of Adelaide Strategic Plan

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

Parks Renaissance. Strategy. Director, Operations. General Committee. Presentation to. May 16, Barb Rabicki

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

CONTENTS 6.1 URBAN DESIGN

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

STRATEGIC DIRECTION. QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART TWO] DECISIONS VERSION 3 strategic direction

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

Chapter 2: OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION PROPOSALS. A New Garden Neighbourhood Matford Barton 17

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Western City District What we heard

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

PUBLIC. Ai + Architecture LLC., 90 Belknap Street, Concord, MA 01742, USA (t) (f)

WATERLOO STATE SIGNIFICANT PRECINCT SUMMARY OF STUDIES

Rosslyn Plaza PDSP (SP #422) SPRC Staff Presentation

Transcription:

Section Heading Section Number Background 2.1 Background Instruction Include (but stated as extrinsic to the PDS) strategic context for the declaration of the PDA publicly accessible link to Master Planning, Urban Design and other studies that demonstrate the need for the project, vision and key principles, particularly why an integrated resort has been considered the best land use to catalyse reinvigoration of this section of the CBD Land Use Plan 3.1 Vision Review/reconsider/delete revitalise the south-western edge of the CBD as a tourism, recreation, cultural and entertainment destination for Brisbane. 3.1 Vision Revise to read The redevelopment of this important part of the city will provide the opportunity for a new integrated resort development with a range of related uses including a casino, function and entertainment facilities, hotels, retail, tourist attractions, cultural, convention, residential and recreation uses, new pedestrian connection to South Bank, waterfront parkland and publicly accessible as well as expansive public. 3.1 Vision casino Comment The Queensland Government has not released detailed studies that this PDA PDS is built upon; The Government must make public the background information, market research, feasibility studies, site analysis, that led to the decision that an integrated resort solution is the best outcome for the QW site. Brisbane is our State Capital City, and the south-western edge of its CBD is its established commercial, administrative and symbolic heart; There are established and emerging tourism, recreation, cultural and entertainment precincts elsewhere in the city that could be further developed without restricting the best future use of the Queens Wharf precinct; The vision should set out higher level desires for the PDA rather than specific building types and uses. If this list is to remain, at this point in the Vision statement, there is a need to include the bridge to Southbank, the waterline parkland, and publicly accessible public as unnegotiable outcomes. There is no need to specify that this precinct must contain a casino. This is a facilitating land use not an outcome that is fundamentally necessary. 1

3.1 Vision iconic contribution 3.1 Vision enhance connections to the waterfront Replace with maintain all existing connections, improve accessibility and add new choices for publicly available and accessible pedestrian connections between the CBD and the river front 3.1 Vision Include Deliver fully approved commercial, retail, civic, 3.2.1 A vibrant core development 3.2.1 A vibrant core development cultural, residential and community uses. Delivers an activated, iconic core development with a range of uses which respond to the local context but also contribute to QWB PDA as a globally competitive tourist precinct. Replace with Delivers an activated development with a range of uses which respond to the local context of Brisbane CBD and the inner city. Provides for unimpeded views from the core development to the Brisbane River and beyond to support the QWB PDA as an iconic tourist destination. Replace with Acknowedges key view corridors into and across the site from the rest of the CBD, adjoining streets and land uses, the South-East Freeway, and the opposite side of the river, as well as within the site. Impacts of iconic contribution s a meaningless and unprovable statement: development on this site needs to be an addition to the existing city form and not a stand alone piece of architecture. enhance connections to the waterfront is too vague. All development within the PDA must be approved. Development within this site must not be undertaken in isolation. Only mentions views from the core of the development: needs to be a much more extensive visual discussion; The diagram only has one viewpoint indicated which is completely unsatisfactory. 2

3.2.1 A vibrant core development 3.2.2 Enhanced movement network 3.2.2 Enhanced movement network 3.2.2 Enhanced movement network 3.2.2 Enhanced the proposal on visual amenity and landscape character should be addressed through a full Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) undertaken by a Registered Landscape Architect with experience in the assessment of such conditions. Provides a range of dwelling types and sizes to facilitate social mix, meet changing demographic needs and opportunities for affordable living. Reinforce a robust and permeable movement network pattern connecting the surround city grid pattern. Enhances pedestrian permeability within the PDA with a number of important mid-block connections and a shared zone environment along Queen's Wharf Road. Replace with Enhances pedestrian permeability within the PDA by retaining existing mid-block connections creating new ones that are publicly accessible at all times and relate to the existing urban grid and city fabric. And Create a shared zone environment along Queen's Wharf Road. Clarify Provides improved pedestrian connections to public transport including ferry terminals. Revise to read Improves pedestrian and bicycle connectivity from Residential use is mentioned only once in the Vision, with no other guidance as to the type, mix or location of housing to be provided. The site must be designed as an extension of the CBD not a super-block. Midblock connections are not clear on the diagram: most are existing; The character and accessibility of the mid-block connections is not expressed: the existing ones are currently accessible to the public around the clock. Is the bridge to be accessible to bikes? The Land Use Plan does not describe or show how public transport to be integrated, apart from ferry terminals. New bridge connection must allow for bicycle use. 3

movement network 3.2.2 Enhanced movement network 3.2.2 Enhanced movement network 3.2.3 Heritage and cultural value 3.2.4 Public 3.2.4 Public the QWB PDA across the Brisbane River to the South Bank Parklands and the Cultural Precinct. Clarify Improves significant intersections and other intersections where required to provide for increased vehicle movements as well as enhance the pedestrian experience in the PDA. Avoids undergrounding or covering of any public streets. Respects the significant cultural and historic context, and original uses of the heritage precinct. Revise Maintains and enhances existing parks, with no loss of useable, publicly accessible area, to provide connectivity to the core of the precinct and contribute to activity within the PDA. Establishes new, improved and different types of public spaces across the PDA which are predominantly publicly owned, entirely publicly accessible and provide for a range of cultural events as well as recreational, tourism, entertainment and How are significant intersections being improved? Does this only apply to vehicular traffic? There is only mention later of a scramble crossing. How is bicycle access being encouraged and provided for? Where can the increased vehicle movements be assessed? How much extra traffic will be generated on local streets and how will parking affect the use of the existing streets and traffic movement? The core development is shown straddling William Street: it is not demonstrated how this improves public connections, what commitment will be given to keeping this open at all times (as opposed to being closed for e.g. security, special events, servicing reasons) and what will be the character of the environment under the building to avoid this being intimidating, and not an unwashed / dusty / outlet for services / fans / emergency access. Current and future use of heritage listed buildings as a casino is unacceptable. Existing public parks must remain in public ownership and public use A designated quantity of new public land be handed over as a public asset once constructed The public spaces are described as publicly accessible. To what degree is this land allocation publicly accessible entirely? Or are there restrictions to its use. Will the land be, handed over as public land? Or is it to be privately owned, publicly accessible land. 4

3.2.4 Public 3.2.5 Environmental value 3.4.8 Notification requirements 3.4.8 Notification requirements 3.4.8 Notification requirements other activities. The public will be a safe, inclusive and appealing environment for residents, visitors and workers, both day and night. Careful planning and design will ensure local streets, parkland and open spaces are integrated with surrounding land uses, have a wide range of activities and will be highly valued by the community. Provides net increase of bio-diversity within the site. Deep planting zones to accommodate large trees are intrinsic to climatic requirements of the site. A design review panel for the QWB PDA will be established. The panel will report to the MEDQ and be paid, independently chaired, and impartial. It will evaluate the design quality of development proposals against the PDA. Amend A PDA development application will require public notification if the application: is for development which in the opinion of the MEDQ, may have adverse impacts on the amenity or development potential of adjoining land under separate ownership. The MEDQ may require public notification in other circumstances if the development application is for a use or of a size or nature which, in the opinion of the Provide safety, variety and inclusivity through design. There must be, at minimum, an increase of bio-diversity to a new city site. Deep planting is essential in the achievement of bio-diversity and the mitigation of negative climactic impacts, in accordance with current rating tools such as Green Star and LEED. Independent and impartial design review is imperative for development on such a significant site. There is an expectation for transparency in the development process; All development on this significant site should be publicly notified. There is an expectation for transparency in the development process; All development on this significant site should be publicly notified. 5

3.5.1 Urban Design 3.5.1 Urban Design 3.5.1 Urban Design 3.5.1 Urban Design 3.5.1 Urban Design MEDQ, warrants public notification. Reflects the role of the precinct as the commercial, administrative and symbolic heart of Brisbane as Queensland s Capital City References the Brisbane City Council City Centre Master Plan and other associated studies and reports, in particular regarding the appropriate mass and scale of development within the CBD. References the Subtropical Design Handbook published by the Centre for Subtropical Design. Acknowedges key view corridors into and across the site from the rest of the CBD, adjoining streets and land uses, the South-East Freeway, and the opposite side of the river, as well as within the site. All unquantifiable statements and terms, including, but not limited to: recognisable local identity best practice urban design outcomes landmark subtropical architecture and landscaping Appealing inclusive and vibrant environment fine-grain uses Brisbane is our State Capital City, and the south-western edge of its CBD is its established commercial, administrative and symbolic heart; There are established and emerging tourism, recreation, cultural and entertainment precincts elsewhere in the city that could be further developed without restricting the best future use of the Queens Wharf precinct; This plan has been through extensive engagement with the community, consultation and approvals and should be a starting point. This document is endorsed at State and Local level. The Structural Elements Plan only mentions views from the core of the development: needs to be a much more extensive visual discussion; The Plan only has one viewpoint indicated which is completely unsatisfactory. There is generally no way for the community or the Minister to be able to judge most of these statements without some guiding design criteria. 6

3.5.2 Built form 3.5.2 Built form 3.5.2 Built form 3.5.2 Built form 3.5.2 Built form A Public Realm Master Plan and Design Guidelines document must be produced as part of the Infrastructure Plan to explain and define the intended urban design outcomes. Reconsider is sensitive to the interface and relationship with heritage places including building separation where appropriate Reconsider provides for conservation and adaptive re-use of heritage places in a way which enhances the vibrancy of the PDA Revise are of a height and scale that makes efficient use of land, is consistent with planned infrastructure and the BCC City Centre Master Plan, and commensurate with the site area Revise provide active frontages which relate to the street and the wider CBD, reinforcing the prevailing streetscape character and contributing to creating an appropriate human scaled interface between buildings and the public including shade and shelter for pedestrians consider overshadowing principles, promoting penetration of winter sunlight to the public on the river edge and to the streets Replace with respond to a comprehensive overshadowing study Provide specific criteria for interface requirements with adjacent/nearby heritage sites or those located within the precinct. For example: in what instances is building separation deemed and appropriate and in what instances is not deemed appropriate? Provide more information on what is deemed acceptable adaptive re-use of heritage sites currently too vague. Prevailing is synonymous with current which could be interpreted a number of ways: this is not what is wanted as an outcome. This section should rather be a reference to the CBD and what the relationship to the rest of the city is. Built form needs to do more than consider : a comprehensive study is required. 7

3.5.2 Built form which explores the effect on the neighbouring streets, existing developments, the botanic gardens and heritage buildings where building over William Street buildings shall not span across the road reserve of William Street Specific criteria for building over William street are inadequate, open ended ( promote / maximise / respect ) and will not necessarily result in a quality public, therefore are not valuable as a guide to community expectations for this key city street. 3.5.4 Public All unquantifiable statements and terms, including, but not limited to: There is generally no way for the community or the Minister to be able to judge most of these statements without some guiding design criteria. local identity and distinctiveness small scale built form A design guidelines document must be produced as part of the Infrastructure Plan to explain and define the intended urban design outcomes. 3.5.4 Public is predominantly held in public ownership as a public asset There must be adequate provision for a substantial portion of the public to be publicly owned, not just publicly accessible. 3.5.5 Environment and sustainability Revise maximise the opportunity to retain existing mature trees, remnant vegetation, marine plants and habitat for fauna where possible 3.5.5 Environment Revise incorporate landscaping with endemic a mix of A broader palette will be required to achieve extensive podium planting, green walls and vertical gardens. and sustainability species that is suitable to the conditions and promotes biodiversity, with a preference towards retaining existing vegetation where possible 3.5.6 Revise Stormwater may be managed in a variety of ways that 8

Infrastructure Plan Community safety and development constraints Table 3 Infrastructure Plan Table 3 Roads and intersections Table 3 Roads and intersections Table 3 Roads and intersections Table 3 Public managing stormwater regard to average recurrence intervals in a manner appropriate to the importance of the site, the adjacent buildings, the use of the public and the severity of potential damage to property, loss of amenity, illness or injury that would result from the failure of the system Comment Provide road and intersection upgrades as required by traffic studies undertaken by the applicant and approved by the MEDQ Replace with Undertake comprehensive traffic studies to analyse and understand the effects of proposed development on traffic congestion in the CBD and wider city. provide on-street bicycle infrastructure Upgrade to on-grade pedestrian links and crossovers impacted by the development. No overpasses or underpasses permissible as exclusive use spaces. Retain and embellish the existing parks in the PDA to improve useability, with no loss of area. provide environmental, health, recreational, educational and amenity benefits. Table 3 does not provide new or adequate information: the details column includes items that are already listed elsewhere, and is not comprehensive. The roads and intersections adjoining the site cannot be looked at in isolation. The use of overpasses and underpasses for pedestrians should not be allowed as it precludes the integration of users into the city fabric. The negative spaces created are not sustainably safe in a passive and efficient way. Embellishments to existing parks must be to enhance the parkland function. Embellishments and usage of existing parks must not diminish their useability for large public gatherings, including freedom-of-speech events and protests. Table 3 Public a Public Realm Master Plan and Design Guide Implementation 5.1 Remove Not the most appropriate land use for this site. 9

Strategy Introduction Delivering a world-class integrated resort development Replace with Delivering a new urban riverside precinct for the CBD of Brisbane, which will support economic, cultural and social development in accordance with the role of the city as the State capital, and with BCC City Centre Master Plan 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Delivering a world-class integrated resort development 5.2 Delivering a world-class integrated resort development A separate, independent body will be established to oversee implementation of the strategy. Its responsibilities will include: Promoting, facilitating, carrying out and controlling the development, disposal and management of land and other property within the PDA; Achieving an appropriate balance between commercial and non-commercial functions; Ensuring development in the PDA complements, rather than duplicates, other development in the inner city Brisbane area; etc Remove Deliver a casino to attract significant visitation from the international gaming market, including VIP facilities. Actions with relation to the provision of residential, eg: Provides a range of dwelling types and sizes to facilitate social mix, meet changing demographic needs and opportunities for affordable living. Not appropriate in this location, nor required refer comments on Section 3.1 Vision Residential use is mentioned only once in the Vision, with no other guidance as to the type, mix or location of housing to be provided. 10

5.3 Delivering a high quality public 5.3 Delivering a high quality public 5.3 Delivering a high quality public 5.3 Delivering a high quality public 5.3 Delivering a high quality public Deliver a resilient and sustainable public. Deliver and manage the public to ensure no overall loss of public access to existing public, and free public access 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Deliver public recreation facilities for the use and enjoyment of residents and visitors. These facilities may include, but are not limited to, public swimming pool, gymnasium, facilities for running / jogging, fitness and children s play, with associated rest rooms. Amend Deliver interpretive signage through the QWB PDA that assists wayfinding. and highlights the indigenous and colonial heritage of the precinct including the Brisbane River. Acknowledge and celebrate the indigenous and colonial heritage of the precinct, including the Brisbane River, through sensitive and well-considered design in consultation with key stakeholders, The project must encourage the investigation and application of sustainable design including, but not limited to, urban agriculture, green roofs, roofwater and stormwater capture and reuse, solar power and green infrastructure; Refer to the Intensive Food Production Guide by City Projects Office, BCC, and the Concept Design Guidelines for Water Sensitive Urban Design by Healthy Waterways. The project must deliver public benefits for residents and day-to-day users, not just resort guests. 11

5.4 Conservation and adaptive re-use of heritage buildings and places indigenous reference group, and community. Amend Provide for conservation and adaptive re-use of existing heritage places within the QWB PDA including activation with a range of uses including boutique retail, food and beverage outlets, offices or hotels where deemed appropriate through consultation with expert heritage consultants and relevant statutory bodies. How have the uses listed been shortlisted as the most suitable adaptive re-use of the existing heritage places? 12