SAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO
|
|
- Dora Holland
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 SAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATING TO APPROVAL OF A DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 309 FOR A PROPOSED PROJECT CONTAINING OFFICE, LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND PARKING, LOCATED AT 235 SECOND STREET ON ASSESSOR=S BLOCK 3736, LOTS 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66 AND 67 IN THE C-3-O(SD) (DOWNTOWN, OFFICE, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT AND THE 200S AND 350S HEIGHT AND BULK DISTRICT. RECITALS 1. On May 6, 1999, David P. Cincotta, Esq., on behalf of Associates ("Project Sponsor"), filed Application No E with the Planning Department for the City and County of San Francisco ("Department") for environmental evaluation of a proposal to demolish seven vacant buildings, adaptively reuse one existing building, and construct a project containing office, light manufacturing and production, distribution, and parking ("Project"). 2. On June 9, 1999, the Project Sponsor filed Application No BX ("Application") with the Department for (i) Planning Code Section 321 (Office Development Annual Limit) and Section 322 (Procedure for Administration of Office Development Limit) Project Authorization for up to 180,000 gross square feet of additional office space, and (ii) Planning Code Section 309 (Permit Review in C-3 Districts) determinations and exceptions for the Project. 3. On December 16, 1999 by Motion No , the Planning Commission (ACommission@) found the Final Environmental Impact Report (AFEIR@) prepared for the Project to be adequate, accurate and objective, and certified the completion of the FEIR in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ACEQA@), the State CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code. 4. On March 2, 2000 the Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting on Application No BX. 5. In reviewing the Application, the Department and the Commission have reviewed and considered the information contained in the FEIR in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code.
2 Page 2 FINDINGS In evaluating the Project's Application, the Commission has also reviewed and considered the Case Report, studies, letters, plans, and other materials pertaining to this Project in the Department's case files, has reviewed and heard testimony and received materials from interested parties during the public hearing on the Project. Having reviewed all the materials identified in the Recitals above, and having heard oral testimony and arguments, this Commission finds, concludes and determines as follows: 1. The above Recitals are accurate and also constitute findings of this Commission. 2. Project Site/Present Use: The Project site is located on the east side of Second Street between Tehama and Clementina Streets, on, Lots 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, and 67. The site is zoned C-3-O (SD) and is within 200S and 350S Height and Bulk Districts. The existing buildings on the site consist of a four-story building on Lot 67, on the north side of the site, and seven one and two-story buildings located on the remaining lots on the site=s south side. Six of the one and two-story buildings (Lots 61, 62, and 64-66) are interconnected with the four-story structure and together total approximately 125,420 square feet including approximately 2,500 square feet of office space, approximately 61,500 square feet of warehouse space and approximately 61,500 square feet of loading and distribution space. The four-story building has a height of 47' and contains approximately 88,000 square feet while the interconnected buildings total 37,400 square feet. These buildings were previously used for storing, hanging and distributing clothing. The operator was recently acquired by another company and has relocated to Southern California. The unattached building (Lot 60) is two stories with a basement and was used as a woodworking shop. The building contains approximately 3,800 square feet of manufacture and production space, approximately 2,000 square feet of storage and 200 square feet of office space. The owner has relocated the operation out of San Francisco due to expansion needs. 3. Nature of Project: The Project will demolish the seven(7) one and two-story buildings located on Lots 60, 61, 62, 64, 65 and 66, and add three floors to the existing four-story building, which will be integrated into the new 7-story structure. The new structure will have a height of approximately 90 feet and consist of approximately 244,000 gross square feet (gsf). This includes up to 180,000 square feet of office, approximately 40,000 square feet of light manufacturing and production, and approximately 24,000 square feet of distribution. The Project also includes approximately 50 parking spaces, 2 loading docks and approximately 4300 square feet of public open space. 4. Environmental Review: The Project as described is included within the scope of development analyzed in the FEIR. The FEIR analyzed two alternatives to the proposed
3 Page 3 Project: Alternative A, No Project, and Alternative B, Reduced Development. As described in Chapters IV and V of the FEIR, the proposed Project would not cause any significant environmental effects or make a significant contribution to cumulative impacts. 5. Compliance with Requirements of Section 309: Due to its location in a C-3-O (SD) District, the Project is subject to the requirements of Section 309 of the Planning Code, which requires determinations of compliance with and allows for exceptions to the Planning Code. The Commission determines that the Project meets all compliance requirements for approval under Section 309 of the Code. The Project is required by the Code to meet the following requirements: 1. Open Space (Section 138): Section 138 requires a project to provide open space in a specified amount and in accordance with specific standards. The Project will provide approximately 4280 square feet of publicly-accessible open space, or approximately 1000 square feet more than the required amount of approximately 3250 square feet. Approximately 2720 square feet will be provided as an Aurban garden@ located in an area set back from the main entrance and located on the corner of Second and Clementina Streets. This area faces south and west thereby maximizing the amount of direct sunlight that will fall on the open space. The Project will also provide approximately 1560 square feet as an Aindoor park@ located on the ground floor and visible through the glass wall that forms the main entrance. The indoor park will be an extension of the urban garden with the same type of paving continued throughout the exterior and interior spaces. These street-level locations are highly visible and easily accessible to the general public. Both spaces will be well-designed and landscaped. The corner of Second and Clementina Streets will be marked by a Afocal tree.@ Various types of seating will be available in both the outdoor and indoor spaces. A retail cafe will be located adjacent to the outdoor urban garden. The Commission hereby finds that the Project open space will be a desirable addition to the City=s open space. It will be accessible, well-designed and comfortable, providing a variety of experiences, meeting both the pedestriancomfort criterion and the seating-comfort criterion (wind speed standards) of Section 148, and fulfilling all requirements of the Downtown Plan and Planning Code Section Pedestrian Streetscape Improvements (Section 138.1): Section requires a project in a C-3 District to install street trees and sidewalk paving as set forth in
4 Page 4 the Downtown Streetscape Plan. The Project will comply by providing sidewalk paving, which will complement the paving of the open space, and landscaping the Urban Garden and Indoor Park which will be visible to pedestrians on Second and Clementina Streets. Street trees will be provided along Tehama, Clementina and Second Streets. The Conditions of Approval require that prior to issuance of the final addendum to the site permit, a final pedestrian streetscape improvement plan including landscaping and paving materials and patterns shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department, in consultation with the Director of the Department of Public Works. As so conditioned, the Commission finds the Project complies with the requirements of Section The Commission finds the Project does not require exceptions pursuant to Section 309(a) of the Planning Code. 7. Sunlight Access to Public Sidewalks in C-3 Districts (Section 146): Section 146(c) provides that new buildings and additions to existing buildings in C-3 Districts shall be shaped, if it can be done without creating an unattractive design and without unduly restricting the development potential of the site in question, so as to reduce substantial shadow impacts on public sidewalks. The Project will cast only minor new shadows on surrounding sidewalks on Tehama, Clementina, and Second Streets, and Oscar Alley in varying degrees and at various times of the day and year. To the extent these shadows might be considered substantial, they could be significantly reduced only by unduly restricting the development potential of the site zoned deliberately to accommodate this amount of office development at this location and also to promote the preservation objectives and policies of the Downtown Plan through the use of TDR. After considering the FEIR and other data and information before it, the Commission determines that the Project meets the standards set forth in Section 146(c). 8. Shadows on Certainly Public or Publicly Accessible Open Spaces in C-3 Districts (Section 147): Section 147 requires that new buildings or additions in the C-3 Districts be shaped, consistent with the dictates of good design and without unduly restricting the development potential of the site, to reduce substantial shadow impacts on public plazas and other publicly accessible space other than those protected under Section 295. A shadow analysis was completed for the addition and new construction as required pursuant to Section 295 of the Code. The results of the study indicate the Project will be fully consistent with the Proposition K requirements and will not cast any new shadow on public plazas or other publicly accessible spaces. After considering the FEIR and other
5 Page 5 data and information before it, the Commission finds the Project meets the standards set forth in Section Type and Location of Artwork (Section 149): Section 149 requires the Project to include works of art costing an amount equal to one percent of the construction cost of the building. The type and location of the artwork, but not the artistic merits of the specific artwork proposed, must be approved by the Commission in accordance with the provisions of Section 309. The project will locate a large scale sculpture at a place within the open space on the corner of Second and Clementina Streets that will make the artwork visually and physically accessible to the public. The artist, Stephen De Staebler, will be appropriately identified. The goal for the public art is to enhance the open space and invite interaction. The precise height, size, type and location of the sculpture will be determined by the Department, the artist and the Project Sponsor. The Conditions of Approval require the Project Sponsor to continue to consult with the Department on the type and location of the artwork. The Conditions of Approval also provide that the final art concept and location shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department in consultation with the Commission, and that the Project Sponsor and the Director shall report to the Commission on the progress of the development and design of the art concept no later than 6 months after the date of this approval. As so conditioned, the Commission approves the type and location of the artwork proposed to be included in the Project as described above. 10. Consistency with the General Plan The Project is, on balance, consistent with and will not adversely affect the General Plan. The Project will affirmatively promote numerous General Plan objectives and policies including, among others, the following: DOWNTOWN PLAN: The Downtown Area Plan of the General Plan contains the following relevant objectives and policies: URBAN FORM Objective 13: Create an urban form for downtown that enhances San Francisco=s stature as one of the world=s most visually attractive cities. Relate the height of buildings to important attributes of the city pattern and to the height and character of existing and proposed development.
6 Page 6 Policy 2: Foster sculpturing of building form to create less overpowering buildings and more interesting building tops, particularly the tops of towers. Objective 14: Create and maintain a comfortable pedestrian environment. Policy 2: Promote building forms that will maximize the sun access to open spaces and other public areas. Promote building forms that will minimize the creation of surface winds near the base of buildings. Objective 15: To create a building form that is visually interesting and harmonizes with surrounding buildings. Policy 2: Ensure that new facades relate harmoniously with nearby facade patterns. Assure that new buildings contribute to the visual unity of the city. Objective 16: Create and maintain attractive, interesting urban streetscapes. Policy 3: Policy 4: Policy 5: Conserve the traditional street to building relationship that characterizes downtown San Francisco. Maintain and enhance the traditional downtown street pattern of projecting cornices on smaller buildings and projecting belt courses on taller buildings. Use designs and materials and include activities at the ground floor to create pedestrian interest. Encourage the incorporation of publicly visible art works in new private development and in various public spaces downtown. The Project=s design relates to existing city pattern and character and maximizes the sun access to the open space area. The Project maintains the traditional downtown street pattern with the use of belt courses
7 Page 7 OPEN SPACE and cornices, uses materials and design to promote activity at the ground floor, and provides art that is visible to the public. Objective 9: Policy 2: Policy 4: Provide quality open space in sufficient quantity and variety to meet the needs of downtown workers, residents, and visitors. Require usable indoor and outdoor open space, accessible to the public, as part of new downtown development. Provide different kinds of open space downtown. Provide a variety of seating arrangements in open spaces throughout downtown. Objective 10: Assure that open spaces are accessible and usable. Develop an open space system that gives every person living and working downtown access to a sizable sunlit open space within convenient walking distance. Policy 3: Policy 4: Policy 5: Keep open space facilities available to the public. Provide open space that is clearly visible and easily reached from the street or pedestrian way. Address the need for human comfort in the design of open space by minimizing wind and maximizing sunshine. The Project provides open space in the form of a well-landscaped, sunlit urban garden and indoor park that will be easily accessible to the public, offer a variety of experiences and seating, and is protected from wind. PRESERVING THE PAST Objective 12: Conserve resources that provide continuity with San Francisco=s
8 Page 8 past. Policy 2: Policy 3: Use care in remodeling significant older buildings to enhance rather than weaken their original character. Design new buildings to respect the character of older developments nearby. The Project=s design enhances the industrial character of the site=s existing building and surrounding older structures. MOVING ABOUT Objective 19: Provide for safe and convenient bicycle use as a means of transportation. Include facilities for bicycle users in governmental, commercial, and residential developments. Objective 21: Improve facilities for freight deliveries and business services. Policy 2: Provide off-street facilities for freight loading and service vehicles on the site of new buildings sufficient to meet the demands generated by the intended uses. Seek opportunities to create new off-street loading for existing buildings. Discourage access to off-street freight loading and service vehicle facilities from transit preferential streets, or pedestrian-oriented streets and alleys. Objective 22: Improve the downtown pedestrian circulation system, especially within the core, to provide for efficient, comfortable, and safe movement. Policy 5: Provide sufficient pedestrian movement space. Improve the ambience of the pedestrian environment. The Project will provide one bicycle space for every 20 automobile spaces. The Project will meet anticipated demand for freight loading by providing 2 loading docks. The Project will create a new open space urban garden and indoor park. SEISMIC SAFETY
9 Page 9 Objective 23: Reduce hazards to life safety and minimize property damage and economic dislocation resulting from future earthquakes. Policy 2: Initiate orderly abatement of hazards from existing buildings and structures, while preserving the architectural and design character of important buildings. The Project will reduce hazards to life safety and minimize property damage and economic dislocation resulting from future earthquakes by constructing a new commercial building complying with all contemporary structural and seismic codes in replacement of existing non-seismically upgraded buildings. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT The Urban Design Element of the General Plan contains the following relevant objectives and policies: City Pattern Objective 1: Policy 3: Emphasis of the characteristic pattern which gives to the city and its neighborhoods an image, a sense of purpose, and a means of orientation. Recognize that buildings, when seen together, produce a total effect that characterizes the city and its districts. The Project=s height, scale and visual characteristics harmonize with and emphasize and make prominent characteristic elements of the downtown core. The Project=s design, which complements the features and scale of the old and new buildings, forms relationships with the surrounding structures allowing the area to collectively contribute to the overall city pattern. Conservation Objective 2: Policy 5: Policy 6: Conservation of resources which provide a sense of nature, continuity with the past, and freedom from overcrowding. Use care in remodeling of older buildings, in order to enhance rather than weaken the original character of such buildings. Respect the character of older development nearby in the design of new buildings.
10 Page 10 By preserving the warehouse design of the four-story structure and utilizing brick material and oversized windows for the new construction, the Project sensitively incorporates and enhances the major design elements of the existing warehouse building. The Project=s 90 foot height and scale will help to transition the adjacent small sized office buildings with the new large scale developments surrounding the site. Major New Development: Objective 3: Policy 2: Policy 3: Policy 4: Policy 5: Moderation of major new development to complement the city pattern, the resources to be conserved, and the neighborhood environment. Promote harmony in visual relationships and transitions between new and older buildings. Avoid extreme contrasts in color, shape and other characteristics which will cause new buildings to stand out in excess of their public importance. :Promote efforts to achieve high quality of design for buildings to be constructed at prominent locations. Promote building forms that will respect and improve the integrity of open spaces and other public areas. Relate the height of buildings to important attributes of the city pattern and to the height and character of existing development. Policy 6: Relate the bulk of buildings to the prevailing scale of development to avoid an overwhelming or dominating appearance in new construction. The Project harmonizes with its surroundings and complements the existing city pattern with a design that preserves the industrial character of the past while providing modern elements that complement new developments as well as provides features that create interest and a pedestrian friendly streetscape. 11. Modification Required By the Commission: Section 309(b) of the Planning Code provides that the Commission may impose additional requirements and limitations in order to achieve the objectives and policies of the General Plan. The Commission does not impose any modifications on the project.
11 Page Each and every finding contained in Motion No. granting approvals for the Project under Section 322 of the Code is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 13. The Commission finds that granting the Project Authorization in this case will particularly promote the public welfare, convenience and necessity for the reasons set forth above. DECISION Therefore, the Commission, after carefully balancing the competing public and private interests, and after considering the criteria of Planning Code Section 309, hereby grants Project Authorization for an office, light manufacturing and production, distribution, and parking development at, subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit C. I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion was ADOPTED by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 2, Linda Avery Commission Secretary AYES: Theoharis, Mills, Antenore, Chinchilla, Joe, Richardson, Martin NOES: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: March 2, 2000
12 Page 12
13 Page 13 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Wherever AProject Sponsor@ is used in the following conditions, the conditions shall also bind any successor to the Project or other persons having an interest in the Project or underlying property. This approval is for the demolition of 7 one and two-story buildings on several lots along Clementina Street, the adaptive reuse of 1 existing four-story building on a separate lot on Tehama Street, and the construction of a 7-story, approximately 90-foot high building containing up to 180,000 gsf of office space, approximately 40,000 gsf of light manufacturing and production space, 24,000 gsf of distribution space, 17,800 gsf for 50 parking spaces, 3300 gsf for 2 loading docks, 1000 gsf of retail cafe space and 4280 gsf of open space in the form of an urban garden and indoor park, with an FAR of approximately 6:1 in general conformance with the plans dated 2/18/00 and stamped Exhibit B. 1. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS This decision conveys no right to construct, or to receive or apply for a building permit. The Project Sponsor must obtain a project authorization under Section 322, and satisfy all the conditions thereof, including mitigation measures addressing environmental impacts. The conditions set forth below are additional conditions required in connection with the Project. If these conditions overlap with any other requirement imposed on the Project, the more restrictive or protective condition or requirement, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, shall apply. 2. CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING (OR SITE) PERMIT OR FINAL ADDENDUM TO A BUILDING (OR SITE) PERMIT. A. Design (1) Highly reflective spandral glass, mirror glass, or deeply tinted glass shall not be permitted. In no case shall visible daylight transmittance be less than 75 percent. Only clear glass shall be used at pedestrian levels. (2) The Project Sponsor and the Project architect shall continue to work on design development with the Department. Particular attention shall be paid to refinement of the lower streetwall on Second Street at the pedestrian level, the entry to the building from the outdoor open space, the possibility of operable windows or additional doors between the outdoor and indoor open spaces, cornices and belt courses and to the general development of the open space design and the art concept.
14 Page 14 (3) Space shall be included for antennae in the building's design to avoid unattractive appendages. (4) Final architectural and decorative detailing, materials, glazing, color and texture of exterior finishes shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department. The Project architect shall submit dimensional design drawings for building details with specifications and samples of materials to insure a high design quality is maintained. (5) Except as otherwise provided in this motion, the Project shall be completed in general accordance with the plans identified as Exhibit B and submitted to the Commission on March 2, B. Open Space (1) The Project shall include the on-site open space urban garden and indoor park described generally in this Motion. (2) The final open space design, including materials and their treatment, furniture, and planting plan including species shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department. The open space flooring shall be of a material which provides a non-slipping surface when wet. C. Pedestrian Streetscape Improvements D. Artwork (1) The Project shall include pedestrian streetscape improvements generally as described in this Motion and in conformance with Section (2) A final pedestrian streetscape improvement plan including landscaping and paving materials and patterns shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department, in consultation with the Director of the Department of Public Works. The Project Sponsor and the Project artist shall consult with the Department during design development regarding the height, size, type and location of the sculpture. The final art concept and location shall be submitted for review by, and shall be satisfactory to the Director of the Department in consultation with the Commission. The Project Sponsor and the Director shall report to the Commission on the progress of the development and design of the art concept no later than 6 months after the date of this approval. E. Transportation
15 Page 15 The Project Sponsor shall submit plans for off-street freight loading and parking for review and approval by the Department. The Project shall include 2 code-complying freight loading spaces at-grade in the loading dock off Clementina Street. There shall be no use of sub-sidewalk space for parking or freight loading. Loading areas shall have raised docks or dock levelers, and receiving areas of sufficient size for short-term storage of goods, and readily accessible freight elevator(s). Driveways shall be designed with curb cuts and a continuous sidewalk with no change in grade. There shall be no curb returns. Additional conditions of approval regarding transportation are contained in Exhibit A attached to Motion (for Case No B) F. Recordation Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the construction of the Project, the Zoning Administrator shall approve and order the recordation of a notice in the Official Records of the Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco, which notice shall state that construction of the Project has been authorized by and is subject to the conditions of this Motion. From time to time after the recordation of such notice, at the request of the Project Sponsor, the Zoning Administrator shall affirm in writing the extent to which the conditions of this Motion have been satisfied, and record said writing if requested. G. First Source Hiring Program The project is subject to the requirements of the First Source Hiring Program (Chapter 83 of the Administrative Code) and the Project Sponsor shall comply with the requirements of this Program. Prior to the issuance of any building permit to construct or a First Addendum to the Site Permit, the Project Sponsor shall have a First Source Hiring Construction Program approved by the First Source Hiring Administrator, and evidenced in writing. Prior to the issuance of the First Certificate of Occupancy, the Project Sponsor shall have a First Source Hiring Occupancy Program approved by the First Source Hiring Administrator, and evidenced in writing." 3. CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY. A. Open Space
16 Page 16 (1) The Project Sponsor shall complete the required on-site open space urban garden and indoor park. (2) The Project Sponsor shall install in the Project open space and shall thereafter maintain a map or diagram which shows the connection between the space and the downtown pedestrian network in the general vicinity of the Project. The materials, content and location of the map or diagram shall be submitted to the Director for approval prior to installation. B. Pedestrian Streetscape Improvements The Project Sponsor shall complete the required pedestrian streetscape improvements. The Project Sponsor shall be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of such improvements if they exceed City standards.
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0101
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0101 Hearing Date: Filing Date: December 8, 2010 Case No.: 2010.1084H Project Address: Conservation District: Kearny Market Mason Sutter Conservation District
More informationHistoric Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2012 Filing Date: July 25, 2012 Case No.: 2012.0361A Project Address: () Landmark: No. 84 San Francisco War Memorial Complex, Civic
More informationHistoric Preservation Commission Motion No Certificate of Appropriateness
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0200 Certificate of Appropriateness HEARING DATE: JUNE 5, 2013 Filing Date: January 23, 2013 Case No.: 2013.0080A Project Address: Historic Landmark: Zoning:
More informationCertificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019
Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019 CONSENT Filing Date: December 6, 2018 Case No.: 2018-016426COA Project Address: 1088 SANSOME STREET Historic Landmark: Northeast
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More informationCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN
More informationFuture Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion
Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process
More informationDraft Planning Commission Resolution Proposed Commission Policy and Planning Code Amendment
Draft Planning Commission Resolution Proposed Commission Policy and Planning Code Amendment HEARING DATE: JULY 14, 2011 Project Name: Case Number: Staff Contact: Reviewed by: Recommendation: Standards
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationThe broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.
Memorandum To: Emily Fultz, AICP City Planner, City of Edwardsville From: Michael Blue, FAICP Principal, Teska Associates Date: January 24, 2019 RE: B-1 Zoning District Update A draft, updated B-1 Central
More informationCITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, 2009 Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707) 449-5140 TITLE: REQUEST: LONGS / CVS DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY & REMODEL TIME EXTENSION
More informationRESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING THE MONTGOMERY 7 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL PROJECT 565 LORRAINE AVENUE ADDENDUM TO THE DIRIDON STATION AREA PLAN FINAL
More informationBuildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.
6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the
More informationThe West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies
Part 2: The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies 2.1 General Policies It is the policy of Council: 2.1.1. That the West Vaughan Employment Area (the WVEA), identified on Schedule 1, will
More informationORDINANCE NO. 430 REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON AMENDING TITLE IV, CHAPTER 13E (WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER
More informationPlanning Commission Draft Motion No HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2010
Planning Commission Draft Motion No. 18211 HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2010 Date: October 14, 2010 Case No.: 2007.1238EMTRU Better Streets Plan and related actions Project Address: Citywide Project Sponsor:
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More information(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4
. General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the
More informationRESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASADENA APPROVING A MASTER PLAN FOR VILLA ESPERANZA WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116 Villa Street
More informationWEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationQUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN
34 QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN 34. QUEEN RIVER SECONDARY PLAN 1. INTRODUCTION The Queen-River area is approximately 6.4 hectares and is located at the eastern edge of the Downtown as shown on Map 34-1.
More informationA RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 16-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING
More informationB. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks
B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks Figure IV.4 A rational block pattern with connected streets Introduction The single most important element in the physical and functional integration of mixed use
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More informationSTAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Holly Smyth, Planning Director Conduct Public Hearing
More informationGlenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan
Implementation 114 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 OVERVIEW This chapter summarizes the administrative procedures necessary to implement the proposed land use plan, infrastructure improvements, development standards,
More informationExecutive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation
Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation HEARING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2015 Date: July 30, 2015 Case No.: 2011.0409PCA Project Address: 925 Mission Street and various parcels (aka 5M ) Existing Zoning:
More informationSDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE
SDOT SDOT Director s Rule 2-07 DPD Applicant: CITY OF SEATTLE Page 1 of 7 Supersedes: DCLU DR 11-93 SED DR 93-4 Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Department of Planning and Development (DPD)
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2018- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BELMONT APPROVING A SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A VACANT LOT ON LOWER LOCK AVENUE (APN: 043-042-750,
More informationSAN FRANCISCO. x ~ OT`s 0~5` PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Certificate of Determination COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION CEQA DETERMNATION
y;~~~ counr~on u "'s' 9z x ~ OT`s 0~5` SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: RTO-M (Residential Transit Oriented-Mission) Use District Calle 24
More informationDesign Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*
CITY OF EAGLE 660 E. Civic Lane, Eagle, ID 83616 Phone#: (208) 939-0227 Fax: (208) 938-3854 Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees* FILE NO.: CROSS
More informationWHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed DDS-600 requesting a departure for the location of two loading spaces without driveway access along Toledo Terrace in
More informationCha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s
Downtown Ann Arbor Design Guidelines Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s This chapter presents general design guidelines for new site plan or PUD projects in downtown Ann Arbor. The
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationBE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWICH
ORDINANCE 1769 ADOPTED 7/2/2018 PUBLISHED 7/4/2018 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORWICH, CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR A VILLAGE DISTRICT
More information~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO
~o counr~, ~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO ~'.~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 2 757 O~~~S 0 Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: Certificate of Determination COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION UMU (Urban Mixed Use) District 58-X Height
More informationCITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM 4.1 APPLICATION Special Temporary Use Permit (TUP) 17-04 PUBLIC HEARING DATE December 19, 2017 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Applicant seeks approval from
More informationIncentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando
Topic: Resource Type: State: Jurisdiction Type: Municipality: Year (adopted, written, etc.): 2002 Community Type applicable to: Title: Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando Document
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay
Applicant/Owner Ocean Rental Properties, LLC Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationCOMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF LACEY Community Development Department 420 College Street Lacey, WA 98503 (360) 491-5642 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION OFFICIAL USE ONLY Case Number: Date Received: By: Related Case Numbers:
More informationSAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: UMU (Urban Mixed Use) Zoning District 68-X Height and Bulk District Life Science
More informationChapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District
Sections 14.53.010 Purpose and Intent 14.53.020 Applicability 14.53.030 Procedure 14.53.040 MPC Standards 14.53.050 Required Findings 14.53.010 Purpose and Intent Chapter 14.53 Master Planned Communities
More informationCITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET
CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE Prior to the actual filing of a Master Plan application, it is strongly recommended that the applicant contact Planning
More informationThe City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. 4 Application complete date: N/A P.C. AGENDA OF: December 6, 2017 Project Planner: Carl Stiehl Project Engineer: David
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director
MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2019 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director SUBJECT: Camino Square, IDA No. CRP-16-02, located at 171
More informationSite Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23
The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown
More informationTHE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 123-2013 A By-law to designate the whole of the City of Vaughan as a Site Plan Control Area, and to adopt site development guidelines and rules of procedure for
More informationSECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines
SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035, INN AT
More informationNOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project Notice
More informationSec Development design approval and procedures.
Sec. 27-185. Development design approval and procedures. (a) Design approval; when required; submission of application. (1) Required. Any property owner or agent thereof proposing to erect a building or
More informationII. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural
More informationAddendum to Environmental Impact Report
Addendum Date: January 2, 2014 Case No.: 2007.0603E Project Title: Compliance Hospital Replacement Program EIR: 2007.0603E, certified June 19, 2008 Project Sponsors: Diane Kay, UCSF Campus Planning (415)
More informationCHAPTER 530 SITE PLAN REVIEW
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 530 SITE PLAN REVIEW Community Planning and Economic Development Development Services Division 250 South 4 th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis MN 55415-1316 612-673-3000
More informationDowntown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board
Agenda Item 5 CONDITIONAL USE DEV2014-095 Pai in the Sky Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board Staff Report TO: Downtown / Ballough Road Board Members FROM: Jason Jeffries, Project Manager DATE:
More informationUrban Design and Preservation Element
Urban Design and Preservation Element Element Goal As the Bay Area and California have grown, older cities like Berkeley have become more and more distinctive in character compared to the sprawling suburbs
More informationWHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;
ORDINANCE NO. 10-03 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAYWOOD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MAYWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 45 TO TITLE 5 AND ESTABLISHING A VOLUNTARY HISTORIC
More informationSUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC2014-00362 259 South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant:
More information3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW
Urban Design 3.0 URBAN DESIGN December 6, 2007 3.1 OVERVIEW The highly urban character of Easton Place is defined by the overall design of the community. The following sections provide an overview of the
More informationSubject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park
Date: September 5, 2018 To: Recreation and Park Commission Capital Committee Through: Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Director, Capital & Planning Division From: Brian Stokle, Planner,
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationMIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT
MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018
More informationPlanned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )
Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:
More informationBayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines
Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines guidelines for New construction projects and major alterations IN the bayshore boulevard home improvement special use DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO
More informationSAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,~} DCfav~ 7_ ~/s' 1s5oM~ss~o~s~. Suite 400 San Francisco, CA
~~~~0 COUNlpom u 'Z x ~~ lb3s 0 61 v,~} SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1s5oM~ss~o~s~. Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 Case No.:
More informationWHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:
File No.DSDS-648 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board has reviewed DSDS-648 requesting a departure of 571.44 square feet from the maximum permitted sign area of building-mounted
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017-16 GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE,
More information.+-M,.-,.+*,,A,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 I-="' e$ ,; \!!&,,u
fv :.,; \!!&,,u.+-m,.-,.+*,,a,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 -="' e$ r,ct,, -; ;: \$ il!!,y.;;., $..L,: [i October 18, 201 0 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning Department SUBJECT:
More informationExecutive Summary Planning Code and Zoning Map Amendments HEARING DATE: JUNE 18, 2015
Executive Summary Planning Code and Zoning Map Amendments HEARING DATE: JUNE 18, 2015 Date: June 11, 2015 Project Name: Case Number: 2015-004022PCA MAP [Board File 150271] Initiated by: Supervisor Yee
More informationArchitectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1
Town of Lexington, SC 1 Introduction Purpose In order to preserve and enhance the rural, cultural, economic and historic character of the Town of Lexington, by providing detailed review of the design,
More information5. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND URBAN DESIGN
2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 5. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIC STATEMENT Berkeley
More informationDesign Review Application
Design Review Application OFFICIAL USE ONLY File Number: Date Received: By: Pre-Application Fee Paid: Design Review Fee Paid: Approved Date: Denied Date: By: ADRE: Yes No APPLICANT INFORMATION Project
More informationFourth Street Spenger s
L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N S t a f f R e p o r t FOR COMMISSION ACTION OCTOBER 2, 2014 1901 1919 Fourth Street Spenger s Structural Alteration Permit Application (LMSAP2014-0006)
More informationThe impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This section addresses the potential impacts to views and aesthetics as a result of the proposed Project at the Project Site and the development scenarios analyzed for
More informationAppendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The continuous and desirable improvement of Arnprior requires a clear understanding of what is envisioned for the Town. These Design
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationMATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING
Final Focused Tiered Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2002072048 Prepared By: OFFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING University of California One Shields Avenue 376 Mrak Hall Davis,
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
More informationPLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE
PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE Zero Canal Plaza Development 0 Canal Plaza 2016-162 Cow Plaza 1, LLC Submitted to: Portland Planning Board Date: August 4, 2016 Public Hearing Date: August 9, 2016
More informationPhilip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division
Date: May 3, 2017 To: Through: From: Recreation and Park Commission Capital Committee Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division Brian Stokle, Planner,
More informationThe transportation system in a community is an
7 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in a community is an important factor contributing to the quality of life of the residents. Without a sound transportation system to bring both goods and patrons
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: September 11, 2015 SUBJECTS: Outdoor Café at Citizen Burger Bar A. SP# 418 Site Plan Amendment to modify an approved
More informationMay 23, EIR. On behalf. eligible. the adoption
May 23, 2016 Submitted by email Adam Villani and Elva Nuno-O Donnell Major Projects Section City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning 6262 Van Nuys Boulevard, Rm. 351 Van Nuys, CA 91401 Email: adam.villani@lacity.org;
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008
Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016
# 9 ZON2016-01032 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME JJT Properties LLC LOCATION 1147 & 1151 East I-65 Service Road South and 1180 Sledge Drive (Southeast corner
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.3 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Approving the removal of Municipal Railway bus zones at various
More informationCity Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.
City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C. DATE: 01/04/2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBJECT: Transit Villages Specific Plan project Study Session (Development Services Director
More informationCITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN
CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN AN ORDINANCE creating new Section 33.02(14) and renumbering current Section 33.02(14) to Section 33.02(15) of the Madison General Ordinances to establish Urban Design District
More informationSECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts
SECTION 1-100 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 1-300 Part 1 Ordinance SECTION 1-100. Introduction. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts Crystal Lake strives to maintain a balance of various land uses for a
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT PREPARED FOR 2568401 ONTARIO INC NEW GASBAR, CONVENIENCE STORE & CARWASH DEVELOPMENT @ 1509 FANSHAWE PARK ROAD WEST LONDON, ONTARIO GAMA ENGINEERING INC. PROJECT NUMBER 1669 PREPARED
More information