Joint Design Review Body Report
|
|
- Adele McBride
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Joint Design Review Body Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Joint Design Review Body Joint Design Review Body Meeting: October 12, 2017 Agenda Item: 6-A and 6-B Stephanie Reich, AIA. LEED AP, Design & Historic Preservation Planner Steve Mizokami, Senior Planner, Landmarks Commission Liaison Certificate of Appropriateness application 17ENT-0195 and Architectural Review Board application 17ARB-0395 for modifications to the previously approved building design, colors, materials and landscape plans for the construction of a new 271-room hotel that includes the retention and adaptive reuse of a City Landmark office building (Santa Monica Professional Building). Modifications to the Landmark building are proposed including additional canopies and signage. In addition, modifications to the new hotel are proposed, including changes to building colors, landscape and hardscape, exterior lighting, and establishment of the overall sign program for the project. Address: Applicant: 710 Wilshire Boulevard Howard Laks Architects Recommended Action It is recommended that the Joint Design Review Body approve Certificate of Appropriateness application 17ENT-0195 and Architectural Review Board application 17ARB-0395 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained within this report. Executive Summary The Joint Design Review Body approved Certificate of Appropriateness 14CA-012 and ARB application 14ARB-173 for building, design, colors, materials, and lighting for the proposed Project. A building permit was issued in January 2017 and construction is underway. Since that time, a new owner/hotel operator has acquired the property, and is requesting design changes to better reflect their brand and to improve the design overall. Proposed modifications including the following: Landmark Building o Modifications to the ground floor restaurant and outdoor dining area to allow the restaurant to be raised approximately 18 inches to 2 feet above the paseo with associated railings, awning, and light fixtures; New Buildings o Change the accent color from blue to charcoal gray; o Modifications to the entry canopy shape; o Modifications to landscaping including reconfiguration of the 2 nd floor terrace, the rooftop area, reconfiguration of the fountain in the paseo, and adding planters to the paseo area and a planter around the outdoor dining 1
2 area o Modifications to the hardscape color and pattern; o Proposed sign program to ensure identification of the hotel, restaurant, and retail businesses on the property; and o Modifications to lighting based on changes described above. Background On September 28, 2015 and March 30, 2016, the Joint Design Review Body (JDRB) voted 7-0 to approve Certificate of Appropriateness 14CA-012 and ARB application 14ARB-173, respectively, for building design, colors, materials and landscape plans for the construction of a new 271-room hotel that includes the retention and adaptive reuse of a City Landmark office building (Santa Monica Professional Building), a bridge connection between the Landmark building and the new hotel building, and 15,210 sf of ground-floor retail/restaurant space. A minor modification to the development agreement was authorized on October 6, 2017 approving relocation of food service and alcohol service areas from the basement and 2 nd floors to the roof top of the new hotel building. Design Analysis Modifications to Adaptive Re-Use of Historic Building The historic Professional Building will remain as previously designed with the exception of Restaurant A, the dining on the south elevation (north elevation of the Paseo). Previously, the dining area was shown open to and at the same level as the Paseo, with outdoor dining shown in the Paseo (refer to sheet R004 in previous submittal). Due to the existing condition within the Landmark building, the finish floor elevation will be above the finish floor of the Paseo. As currently proposed, the dining area will extend out into the Paseo, with a perimeter railing. The railing is open, minimal, modern yet appropriate to the Landmark structure. Awnings have been added over these small terraces. The awnings are proposed to be attached on the inside face of the pilasters. A condition has been included to ensure all awnings, lighting and signage be sensitively attached to the historic building to disturb the historic surface as little as possible. The revised configuration of the dining area will continue to activate the Paseo while providing a lively and appropriate use at the ground floor of the historic building. Landscape and Hardscape Design At Grade: The hardscape design previously proposed had a very pronounced and active pattern (see sheet L101 of previous submittal). The current submittal maintains a curvilinear design that is simplified yet remains dynamic (see sheet L101 in current submittal). The curvilinear design extends out to the Public Right-of-Way. The City supports a design that makes a seamless transition for the betterment of the public realm. This feature is shown on the plans but is not a part of the ARB application being considered as it is not within the purview of the JDRB. A condition has been added that requires that any proposed modifications to the public right-of-way shall be coordinated with ARB staff and Public Works as part of the project s off-site improvement plan. For informational purposes, staff would require a dark grey concrete instead of terrazzo for long-term maintenance purposes. The concrete color should closely match the terrazzo color. 2
3 The fountain and planting configuration has similarly been modified. The fountain has been simplified and appears better integrated into the design. Additionally, the outdoor dining area associated with the new hotel building has been more clearly delineated with a complementary curvilinear form close to 7 th Street. This will serve to enliven the street and the Paseo. There are three round planters shown as well- one at the Paseo entry at Wilshire Boulevard, one at the Paseo entry at 7 th street, and one located central in the plaza area between the two buildings, across from the reconfigured fountain. While the planter across from the fountain may serve to enliven the space, the combination of the outdoor dining area divider and the round planters closer to the street appear to inhibit entry into the Paseo. The paseo area is an identified community benefit of the development agreement with the intent of being a public use area. In previous reviews, the JDRB expressed interest in the Paseo being designed to feel open and welcoming to the street in order to maximize public accessibility. To that end, a condition has been added to recommend either the elimination or reconfiguration of these planters. Previously Approved Paseo Entry (7 th Street) Proposed Paseo Entry (7 th Street) 3
4 Second Level: The outdoor terrace has been further developed for improved function and design. The terrace is adjacent to a meeting room and fitness area, with landscaping on the east edge to buffer the space from adjacent residential uses. The hardscape pattern is similar to the curvilinear terrazzo in shades of gray used in the Paseo to provide a consistent look and feel to the outdoor spaces. Planting shown is complementary in color and form while providing visual interest. These modifications are consistent with the conditions of approval for 14ARB-173, which required that the applicant work with staff to improve the landscaping on the terrace level. In the Board s prior review, there was also discussion regarding relating the landscape concept on the terrace level to the ground floor. Rooftop: The rooftop amenity spaces have also been more fully developed for improved function and design. The dining space has been consolidated on the northern portion, with an outdoor area and bar in the central portion, with the pool and pool deck more fully designed on the southern portion of the roof. In particular, the pool area has a wood deck to the west as a lounge area, and landscaping on the perimeter takes a sculptural approach, providing a variety of types and sizes of spaces conducive to a variety of experience and enjoyment. Each terrace space is more clearly defined and developed and will serve to enhance the overall building design. The plant palette has been simplified somewhat and includes a variety of plants that will work well together in color and form. Included are some dramatic choices such as Dracaena draco and Aloe Cynthia Giddy providing a pop of color. Hotel Entrance Canopy The building entrance canopy has been simplified, streamlined and is better integrated into the overall design. Previously Approved Entrance Canopy 4
5 Proposed Entrance Canopy Building Color The proposed building color palette has been modified to replace the blue color with a charcoal grey in most areas where the blue was previously shown, primarily on the straight edges, the gaps or spaces between buildings, and in the bridge element. The charcoal grey color will reinforce the design concept by creating a sense of shadow in the gap elements, and have the overall effect of a more quiet and elegant building. The canopy or edge detail at the ground floor will be light grey color further integrating this element into the overall building design Previously Approved East Elevation Proposed East Elevation 5
6 Sign Program/Sign Plans A Sign Program is proposed that unifies the signage between the historic and new buildings. A variety of sign types are proposed including wall, window, and projecting signs. All will be installed on the ground level or ground floor façade to identify, inform, and facilitate business identification and wayfinding in and around the site. A SF monument is also proposed along the 7 th Street elevation. The primary tenant, Proper Hotel is identified in the Sign Program while space is identified for all other businesses. The overall sign proposal illustrates restraint and thoughtfulness in regards to size of each sign/sign area and their placement on the buildings throughout the site without impacting important design features. The proposed sign program/sign plans is compliant with the Sign Code. Page 35 of the sign submittal identifies locations of all signs and their associated square footages. The majority of the signs are relatively small and are sensitively placed throughout the site to avoid overconcentration in any one area. The largest sign is the 22 SF wall sign over the entry door of the historic building fronting Wilshire Boulevard, which identifies Proper Hotel. This sign design is simple and purposeful and complements the historic revival style of the Santa Monica Professional Building and the new contemporary hotel building on the same site. Signs proposed on the historic building that primarily front Wilshire Boulevard incorporate neon tubing against white aluminum backplate complementary with its historic context and traditional detailing. Proposes signs for the new building are contemporary in appearance and consist of individual freestanding channel letters on aluminum canopies. Window signs and informational/directions sign are small and discreet. SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS Multi-tenant Buildings Yes (hotel with commercial/retail tenants on the ground level) Existing Sign Program No Permitted Sign Area SF ( SF along Wilshire Blvd; 350 SF along 7 th Street) Existing Sign Area (signs that will remain) None Proposed Sign Area 164 SF (288.5 SF below the maximum allowable area) (this application) Total Sign Area 164 SF Upon Completion Total Number 26 of New Signs Compliance Yes Sign Type: Window Proposed Materials: Monument Sign (1), Wall Signs, Projecting Signs, Signs Matte Brass, Brass with Oxidized Blackened Finish, Aluminum, Gold Leaf Vinyl 6
7 Method of Illumination: Proposed Dimensions (Area): Font: Color: LED-illuminated, face lit, halo lit, neon Various, refer to sign design package GT Walshiem, GT Spectra Gold, Black, Warm Gray, White CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FINDINGS: 1. The proposed alterations would not detrimentally change, destroy or adversely affect any exterior feature of the Landmark property. Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of the Landmark building in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards and the Certificate of Appropriateness will make the building safer in light of current building and fire codes, rehabilitate and restore its characterdefining features, and ensure that the Landmark building endures for future generations. Exterior modifications include awnings, lighting, and a railing around the outdoor dining area for Restaurant A. The dining area terrace, railing and awnings are sensitive to the historic building but clearly new and modern and do not provide a false sense of historicism. Signage is minimal complementary and sensitive to the historic structure. The railing, awnings, lighting, and signage for the ground floor dining area of the Landmark building will be attached to the building in a minimally invasive and reversible manner, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards. Modifications to the hardscape, color and details of the new building will serve to complement the Landmark building. ARB FINDINGS: B. The plan for the proposed building or structure is expressive of good taste, good design, and in general contributes to the image of Santa Monica as a place of beauty, creativity and individuality. The contemporary design of the new hotel building is complementary to the distinctive features of the Landmark building. The modifications to the building design including revised paving pattern and materials, color, ad details serve to further enhance the design concept and provide a fully integrated design. C. The proposed building or structure is not of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local neighborhood or environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value in that high quality material as detailed in the application submittal and as presented to the Joint Design Review Body will be used, with modifications improving the design and quality of the architecture. D. The proposed design of the building or structure is compatible with developments on land in the general area. The proposed project has been designed with significant building setbacks to ensure that the mass and scale of the project is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood context. In particular, the revised 7
8 colors and canopy details will serve to better complement the historic building and the surrounding context. E. The proposed development conforms to the effective guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to Chapter 9.55 Architectural Review Board, and all other applicable ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. Specifically, the location and appearance of the buildings and structures comply with required findings set forth in Chapter 9.55, as documented by the Joint Design Review Body, and as conditioned, the plans will fully comply with all applicable regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. CONDITIONS: 1. All lighting, signage and awnings on the historic building shall be attached to the building should be reversible, and disturb the historic surface and materials as little as possible. 2. The terrazzo hardscape that extends out to the Public Right-of-Way as shown on Sheet L101 of the Plans is not a part of this approval. Any modifications to the Public Right-of-Way shall be shown on the Project s off-site improvements plans and shall be coordinated with ARB staff and Public Works. 3. The round planters near the 7 th Street and Wilshire entries into the Paseo shall be relocated to ensure that the entry opening to the Paseo is maximized or eliminated. 4. These approvals are for the plans reviewed on October 12, 2017, which are on file in the City Planning Division, except as amended by JDRB action. 5. These approvals shall expire when the administrative or discretionary entitlements, not including any Subdivision Map approvals, previously granted for the project have lapsed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the plans are consistent with the plans approved pursuant to Development Agreement Significant changes to the project s design shall require review and approval of the Joint Design Review Body. Minor changes may be approved administratively pursuant to all applicable Architectural Review Board and Landmarks Commission guidelines. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate landscape and irrigation plan compliance with the City s Green Building Ordinance standards (SMMC 8.108) subject to staff approval. Modifications to the landscape plan that affect less than 150 square feet of area may be reviewed and approved by the Staff Liaison to the Board. 8. All work shall be done in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 8
9 The Joint Design Review Body s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application may be appealed to the City Council if the appeal is filed with the City Clerk within ten consecutive days following the date of the Joint Design Review Body s determination in the manner provided in SMMC Section Attachments A. Applicant s Submittal Material B. Applicant s March 30, 2016 Submittal Material C. JDRB Meeting Minutes March 30, 2016 D. JDRB Meeting Minutes January 11, 2016 F:\CityPlanning\Share\ARB\STFRPT\SR17\Joint Design Review Body 710 Wilshire 2017 revisions 9
Architectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED
More informationM E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: Certificate
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: July 31, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.3 Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison, and Stephanie
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Design Guidelines for Lower Downtown Historic District, Appendix A: Standards and Guidelines for Signs (2014), pg.
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationCommercial Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Robert Myers Robert Myers 2955 and 2989 Dauphin Street (Southeast corner of Dauphin Street and Sage Avenue) CITY
More informationAppendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The continuous and desirable improvement of Arnprior requires a clear understanding of what is envisioned for the Town. These Design
More informationCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationLocation and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed Special Permit Application No. SP-130008, Sudsville Laundry, requesting a special permit to construct an addition and
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationM E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY PLANNING DIVISION
M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY PLANNING DIVISION DATE: March 12, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Roxanne Tanemori,
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationNarcoossee Roadway Corridor
Community Meeting Narcoossee Roadway Corridor April 5, 2012 Meeting Agenda Purpose of Meeting Continuation of Study Update Process (Previous Meetings Oct. & Nov., 2011) Tonight s Objective Review Proposals
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permit (Car Wash Facility) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders
Applicant Property Owner SunTrust Bank Public Hearing October 10, 2018 City Council Election District Princess Anne Agenda Item 2 Request Conditional Use Permit (Car Wash Facility) Staff Recommendation
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationI Street, Sacramento, CA
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento 12 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 To: Members of the Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING March 10, 2011 Subject: El Dorado Savings Sign Variance
More informationRequest Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara
Applicant Larae Tucker Property Owner Doswell Ventures, LLC Public Hearing May 10, 2017 City Council Election District Princess Anne Agenda Item 3 Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project: 2016-COA-356 Meeting: September 8, th Street Oxford Hotel
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 20 West Colfax, Dept. 205 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org This
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2015 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair McCormick and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Kelly Christensen
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 planning@cupertino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. Agenda Date:
More informationAgenda Report Meeting Date 08/01/18
Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report Meeting Date 08/01/18 DATE: July 16, 2018 File: AR 18-16 TO: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board FROM: Kimber Gutierrez,
More information(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4
. General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F1 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Development Services Department Submitted and Reviewed by Sergio Klotz, Al~ rector~ Prepared by Mathew Evans,
More informationPLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017
PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION Mobile Christian School 5900 Cottage Hill Road (North side of Cottage Hill Road, 230 ± West of Freemont Drive
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More information8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing
8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: PRICE S HOLDINGS, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Lasley REQUEST: A. Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) B. Change in Nonconforming
More informationlot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site
Commercial General Commercial Objectives Create developments compatible with adjacent land uses in scale, function and character Define a consistent and attractive street edge with quality landscaping,
More informationCITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. ITEM NO: 6.a 6.b STAFF: LONNA THELEN
Page 156 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: 6.a 6.b STAFF: LONNA THELEN FILE NO(S): A. - CPC ZC 08-00069 QUASI-JUDICIAL B. - CPC CU 08-00070 QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: PHIL LONG VALUCAR
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 23, 2004 DATE: October 6, 2004 SUBJECT: SP #106-3 Site Plan Amendment for changes to façade, plaza deck, landscaping, number of units,
More informationMulti family Residential Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Multi family Residential Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character
More informationELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES
......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and
More informationDEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT
6.01. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Site Planning B. Architectural Design C. Medical Facility Signage & Lighting D. Exhibit 48. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 6.02. MEDICAL FACILITY STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
More informationPentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3
Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3 CPHD April 23, 2015 Meeting Agenda Overview of approved Phase I Site Plan Review of relevant design guidelines Presentation of current proposal
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL
CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL AGENDA PART 1: FRAMEWORK 1. Objectives and Background
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 10, 2012 DATE: February 29, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #197 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to add a new condition #25 to allow a new use for a Yoga and Pilates
More informationCITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.
CITY CLERK Consolidated Clause in Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004. 28 Request for Direction Report - Site Plan Approval Application 03 200020 NNY 24 SA - Marek
More informationRezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017
Rezoning Petition 2017-090 Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017 REQUEST LOCATION SUMMARY OF PETITION PROPERTY OWNER PETITIONER AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE COMMUNITY MEETING STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY
More informationCommunity Character and Design Guidelines Questionnaire
Community Character and Design Guidelines Questionnaire This questionnaire was created in an effort to ensure applicants utilization of the City Council adopted Santa Clarita Community Character and Design
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009
Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Project: Warda Warehouse File: EG-08-051 Request: Design Review Location: 9260 Bendel Place APNs: 134-0660-004 Planner: Gerald Park Property Owner/Applicant
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:
More informationARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT
ARTICLE 11.10 RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT (adopted 11/22/2011 MC16-116-11) SECTIONS: 11.10.01 Intent 11.10.02 Boundaries of District 11.10.03 Development Standards 11.10.04 Variance 11.10.01
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2006 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS TOM BARTLETT, CITY PLANNER ISIDRO FIGUEROA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationCITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.3 STAFF REPORT August 18, 2015 Staff Contact: Peyman Behvand (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.3 STAFF REPORT August 18, 2015 Staff Contact: Peyman Behvand (707) 449-5140 TITLE: REQUEST: VISTA CROSSINGS PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT PLANNED
More informationHendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines
Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines Adopted May 16, 2007 Revised September 15, 2010 Drafted by the members of the Proposed Main Street
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008
Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:
More informationURBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES
MINUTES 2016-03-15 PRESENT: UDPRP Members Adrian Dyer Studiodyer, Architect Jason McIntyre Cornerstone Architecture, Architect John Nicholson Nicholson Sheffield Architects Inc., Architect Jordan Kemp
More information.+-M,.-,.+*,,A,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 I-="' e$ ,; \!!&,,u
fv :.,; \!!&,,u.+-m,.-,.+*,,a,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 -="' e$ r,ct,, -; ;: \$ il!!,y.;;., $..L,: [i October 18, 201 0 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning Department SUBJECT:
More informationPlanning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016
Planning Board Hearing October 0th, 06 Developer: Real Estate Management & Leasing: Architect: Transportation Engineers: Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: THE ARSENAL PROJECT Planning Board AGENDA Introduction
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: Design Review Committee Development Services Department Reviewed and Submitted by: David Contreras, Senior Planner ~ _1)/} Prepared by: Laura
More informationSUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationWHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:
File No.DSDS-648 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board has reviewed DSDS-648 requesting a departure of 571.44 square feet from the maximum permitted sign area of building-mounted
More informationCHAPTER 5 Public Realm Improvements
5.1 OVERVIEW This chapter focuses on the public realm, that is, spaces within and directly adjacent to public rights-of-way (ROWs), including streets, Oso Creek, the rail corridor, and the freeway edge.
More informationPLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD
APPROVED PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD The Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield held a Workshop Meeting at 7:30 P.M. on at the Village Hall, 850 Waukegan Road, Deerfield, Illinois. Present
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Bill Landfair
Applicant Property Owner RTR Real Estate Associates, Tidewater Investments, LLC, Bruce Ranomski Public Hearing December 12, 2018 City Council Election District Centerville Agenda Item 7 Request Conditional
More informationCOMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent
COMMUNITY DESIGN Intent An attractive, well-designed County will attract quality development, instill civic pride, improve the visual character of the community, and create a strong, positive image for
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: September 11, 2015 SUBJECTS: Outdoor Café at Citizen Burger Bar A. SP# 418 Site Plan Amendment to modify an approved
More informationAIRPORT BUSINESS PARK
PIER MAC PETROLEUM INSTALLATION LTD. AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS March 2003 4.1 Airport Business Park Development Permit Area 4.1.1 Justification/Design Concept The design concept envisioned
More informationWEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE
More informationBUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES
Des Plaines, Illinois Prepared for the City of Des Plaines by: The Lakota Group Laurie Marston, AICP March 2005 Section 5: Streetscape Elements Business District Design Guidelines STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: Date: 5-03-18 Pike and Rose, Phase I: Site Plan Amendment No. 82012002D Rhoda Hersson-Ringskog,
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationTO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009
Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PASADENA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT 1515 NORTH LOS ROBLES AVENUE AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035, INN AT
More informationPlanning Commission Report
Planning Commission Report To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Meeting: January 6, 2016 Agenda Item: 8-B Planning Commission David Martin, Planning & Community Development Director Introduction to the
More informationFuture Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion
Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process
More informationPrepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests a Design Review Permit Modification
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed Departure from Design Standards DDS-631 requesting a departure to allow the loading space and the driveway to the loading
More informationHistoric Resources. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant
Historic Resources City of San Mateo Planning Division Community Development Department 330 West 20 th Avenue www.cityofsanmateo.org San Mateo, CA 94403 planning @cityofsanmateo.org Updated: March 20,
More informationDRAFT. 10% Common Open Space
% OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity
More informationKASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016
KASPER City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 Applicant: Sentinel Land Company, LLC 4910 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA Prepared by: SEC Planning
More informationSMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation
SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE
More information1. In the Lark perimeter overlay zone we should set a maximum density of eight units/acre.
General Plan Committee and Planning Commission Recommendations Regarding Town Council Suggestions for Potential Amendments to the Adopted North 40 Specific Plan The Town Council suggestions for potential
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp
Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp Location 845 Lynnhaven Parkway GPIN 14963473030000 Election District Rose Hall Site Size 0.40 acre portion of a 6.35 acre
More information6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC
6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: LC REALTY, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Kevin Kemp REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Automated Car Wash) ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 3565 Holland Road
More informationResolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003
Resolution 03-011: Exhibit A Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Adopted March 2003 1 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted
More informationREQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)
Rezoning Petition 2016-117 Zoning Committee Recommendation January 4, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) LOCATION
More information12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (from PD-H1 Planned
More informationThe Park at Fifth Street The Providence Group Legal Description ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN LAND LOT 279, 18TH DISTRICT, DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA, CONSISTING OF FIVE TRACTS: TRACT ONE (PIN:18
More informationTable of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2 Plan Guidelines 3 Future Urban Form 4 The West-End 4 Main Street 6 The East-End 7 Figure 2 9 Public Improvement Recommendations 7 General
More informationDistrict Design Guidelines - Cultural District
District Design Guidelines - Cultural District The Cultural District is the entertainment and cultural center of Overland Park, anchored by the American Museum of Natural History and Cinetopia, a state
More informationshown on the following page.
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN May 5, 2016 Ms. Tricia Schimpp Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403-1388 RE: Hillsdale Terrace Dear Tricia:
More information4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN
4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN CASTLE ROCK DESIGN 54 4. INDUSTRIAL Overview Well-designed and attractive industrial centers are the product of blending economic realities with both functional and
More informationPhase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting
Hoboken Terminal and Yard Phase I Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting May 31, 2011 One Hudson Place Phase I Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting Agenda 1. Redevelopment
More informationCha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s
Downtown Ann Arbor Design Guidelines Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s This chapter presents general design guidelines for new site plan or PUD projects in downtown Ann Arbor. The
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES. Seattle Children s Major Institution Master Plan. Approved May 7, 2010
Approved May 7, 2010 Contact: Todd Johnson, todd.johnson@seattlechildrens.org, (206)987-5259 A. MASTER PLAN... 3 A1.0 Context... 3 A1.1 Purpose of Design Guidelines... 3 A1.2 Design Guidelines... 4 B....
More informationJuly 6 th, Re: The Sugarmont Apartments Planned Development. Dear John,
July 6 th, 2016 Planning Division Community And Economic Development Salt Lake City Corporation c/o John Anderson 451 South State Street, Room 215 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Re: The Sugarmont Apartments
More informationRegular Session. Legislative Regular Agenda
Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Review Commission of the City of Georgetown April 23, 2015 at 6:00 PM at Council and Courts Building, 101 East 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City
More information