PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)
|
|
- Moris Parker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) , INN AT THE MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO FOR A NEW HOTEL WITH 124 ROOMS, A RESTAURANT, BANQUET FACILITIES, GARDEN PLAZA, SWIMMING POOL, KIDS CLUB AND FITNESS CENTER LOCATED AT ORTEGA HIGHWAY (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS , 14, 15, & 16)(APPLICANT: DAN FRIESS, MISSION COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC.). Whereas, Dan Friess, Mission Commercial Properties, Inc., on behalf of South Coast Investors II, LLC, Camino Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, CA (the Applicant ), has requested approval of AC , a request for approval of development plans for a new hotel to include 124 rooms, a restaurant, banquet facilities, garden plaza, swimming pool, kids club and fitness center (the Modified Project ). The proposed project is a modification to the previously approved Plaza Banderas Hotel (AC ) project located at Ortega Highway and is generally located at the northeast corner of Ortega Highway and El Camino Real; and, Whereas, on October 19, 2010, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to the land use designation (GPA ) and approved the Plaza Banderas Hotel Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 10-01) within a Planned Community (PC); and, Whereas, on October 19, 2010, the City Council approved a Rezone to the City s Zoning Map (RZ ) and approved the Plaza Banderas Hotel Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 10-01) within a Planned Community (PC); and, Whereas, South Coast Investors II, LLC, Camino Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675, are the owners of real property located at Assessor s Parcel Numbers , 14, 15, & 16; and, Whereas, the AC has been processed pursuant to Section , Development Review of the Land Use Code; and, Whereas, on July 26, 2016, the Planning Commission approved an Addendum to the Final EIR for the Plaza Banderas Hotel Project (SCH# ) for the Modified Project, which includes this AC The Addendum fully disclosed the changes and additions that were made to the Plaza Banderas Hotel Project EIR to make it applicable to the Modified Project, including AC15-035; and, Whereas, the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans on February 11, 2016, March 24, 2016, April 14, 2016, May 12, 2016 and June 9, 2016 and recommended that the item move forward to the Planning Commission; and,
2 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 Whereas, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on July 26, 2016 pursuant to Title 9, Land Use Code, Section and City Council Policy 5 to consider public testimony on the proposed project and has considered all relevant public comments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby find that the Addendum to the Final EIR for the Plaza Banderas Hotel Project (SCH# ) fully and completely addresses any and all environmental impacts associated with the Modified Project, including AC15-035, and that no further environmental review is required before the Planning Commission approves AC15-035; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as established by Section of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano in support of Architectural Control (AC) : 1. The proposed use and design of the project comply with all applicable provisions of Title 9 of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code and any applicable specific plan or comprehensive development plan because the proposed modification reduces the overall intensity of the project while maintaining conformance with the Plaza Banderas Hotel Comprehensive Development Plan s (CDP 10-01) approved development concept, maintains consistency with the Architectural Design Guidelines through the Spanish/Mission Revival and Monterey Revival architectural design, and complies with the development standards related to building setbacks, building heights and parking requirements. Specifically, the proposed modifications reduce the overall building site coverage from about 47,907 square feet for the Plaza Banderas Hotel project to about 42,261 square feet for the proposed project. The modified design also maintains consistency with the CDP s Architectural Design Guidelines through architectural design that incorporates varied building massing, roof design, fenestration, and the use of colonnades, roof design, and tower elements, along with architectural details such as heavy wood beams, wrought iron, classic lighting, and Spanish tile to create an authentic design. Furthermore, the project has been designed to conform with the CDP Section Overall Goals: 1. Reinforce and enhance the City s downtown as one of the primary focal points of the community; The proposed project is located at the main-entry gateway to the downtown area and has been designed to reinforce the City s heritage and tradition of architecture and design. The Spanish/Mission Revival and Monterey Revival architectural design elements that will allow the proposed development to architecturally exist amongst the adjacent buildings that are located within the downtown area. 2. Contribute to the existing pedestrian-oriented village-like environment; The proposed project has a well-balanced pedestrian orientation and human scale. The project provides architectural features such as balconies, arches,
3 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 window awnings and varied roof planes that provide for architectural articulation that break-up the building mass. The pedestrian circulation experience is enhanced with the plaza area that is located at the southwest corner of the site, enhanced paving throughout the pedestrian corridors of the site and landscaping along the interior paseo and perimeter of the project. 3. Complement the scale, proportion and character of development in the surrounding area; The proposed project has an architectural design that incorporates varied building massing, roof design, fenestration, and the use of colonnades, roof design, and tower elements, along with architectural details such as heavy wood beams, wrought iron, classic lighting, and Spanish tile to create an authentic design. 4. Establish attractive, inviting, imaginative and functional site arrangement of buildings and parking areas; The proposed project provides a continuous access drive through the parking lot with entrances from Ortega Highway, Spring Street, and El Camino Real with a total of three (3) access driveways. Pedestrian access to the Hotel building from the parking lot is also provided via a sidewalk at the south side of the parking lot. All surface parking is designed to include landscaping to visually buffer views from the adjoining streets. Pedestrian linkages through the plaza into the project site are proposed to include landscape areas, a courtyard lounge, fountains, and lighting. Furthermore, the proposed pedestrian circulation design allows for hotel users to access the restaurant building via a paseo and with a connection to the plaza area, which will provide a place for sitting, congregating and waiting. The plaza will include a fountain, enhanced paving, landscaping and seating and will provide an inviting outdoor social experience for visitors and pedestrians that travel to and from the downtown area. 5. Create a high quality architectural and landscape design which provides proper access, visibility and identity; and, The proposed project incorporates earth-tone colors to enhance the architectural details of the project. The Mission-style stucco finish will complement the use of exposed wood beams and columns, wrought iron accent details and roof materials. The applicant also proposes to install landscaping along the perimeter of the buildings and along the interior paseo between the hotel and the restaurant building; and integrated with enhanced paving which will enhance the overall pedestrian experience because the outdoor plaza will provide visual interest with a fountain and mature trees; and will complement the existing pedestrian experience. 6. Provide stylistically diverse and creative architectural design solutions, which convey a sense of timelessness and elegance.
4 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 The proposed project has an architectural design that incorporates varied building massing, earth-tone colors, roof design, fenestration, and the use of colonnades, roof design, and tower elements, along with architectural details such as heavy wood beams, wrought iron, classic lighting, and Spanish tile to create an authentic design. 2. The proposed use and design of the project is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan, including the Community Design Element because the goals and policies of the General Plan Community Design Element are substantially implemented through the City s adopted Architectural Design Guidelines. The Plaza Banderas Hotel Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 10-01) was approved in 2010 because it was established that it complied with the Architectural Design Guidelines; and the proposed modifications to the Plaza Banderas Hotel project are designed to comply with the CDP which contains Design Standards that are intended to provide further guidance to ensure that high quality architectural design is integrated into the proposed development plans. Furthermore, the project will be consistent with the following policies and objectives of the Community Design Element: Community Design Goal 1: Policy 1.2: Encourage high-quality and human scale design in development to maintain the character of the City; and, The proposed project has a well-balanced pedestrian orientation and human scale. The project provides architectural features such as balconies, arches, window awnings and varied roof planes that provide for architectural articulation that break-up the building mass. The pedestrian circulation experience is enhanced with the plaza area that is located at the southwest corner of the site, enhanced paving throughout the pedestrian corridors of the site and landscaping along the interior paseo and perimeter of the project. Community Design Goal 2: Policy 2.1: Encourage development which complements the City s traditional, historic character through site design, architecture, and landscaping. The proposed project incorporates earth-tone colors to enhance the architectural details of the project. The Mission-style stucco finish will complement the use of exposed wood beams and columns, wrought iron accent details and roof materials. The applicant also proposes to install landscaping along the perimeter of the buildings and along the interior paseo between the hotel and the restaurant building, and the landscaping, integrated with enhanced paving, will enhance the overall pedestrian experience because the outdoor plaza will provide visual interest with a
5 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 fountain and mature trees and will complement the existing pedestrian experience. Furthermore, the Historic Town Center Master Plan establishes the overall goals, policies, and development concept for the historic downtown including the subject property. The Master Plan specifically designates the subject property for the development of a destination hotel that would serve as an architectural focal point and entry statement to the downtown. The Master Plan notes, A primary component of the gateway is the proposed Plaza Banderas, which includes a 124- room hotel fronting Ortega Highway along with two small retail and restaurant buildings fronting Ortega Highway and El Camino Real. Moreover, the Historic Town Center Master Plan provides, An appropriately-sized plaza with an iconic element such as a fountain, statue, or other piece of public art, can also contribute to the gateway on this site while keeping the proposed retail building a comfortable distance from the busy intersection. The project proposes a fountain and Historic Depiction program within a plaza. As such, staff has determined that the proposed project design will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the Community Design Element, as well as, all other applicable provisions of the General Plan. 3. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate all yards, open spaces, setbacks, parking, access, and other features pertaining to the application, except as otherwise approved because the 3.18-acre Inn at the Mission site has been designed to accommodate the required project building elements, as set forth in CDP ,and because the Inn at the Mission s development characteristics meet all of the development standards established in the Plaza Banderas Hotel CDP 10-01, including required building setbacks, building heights, open areas, massing, landscaping, parking and site access. Furthermore, the proposed project reduces the overall building footprint coverage on the project site from about 47,907 square feet for the Plaza Banderas Hotel project to about 42,261 square feet and provides more onsite parking than the previously approved Plaza Banderas Hotel project while reducing the overall development intensity. 4. The character, scale and quality of the architecture, site design and landscaping are consistent with the adopted Architectural Design Guidelines of the City because as demonstrated within this staff report, the proposed Inn at the Mission s design relies on the use of varied wall planes and roof lines, alternative building massing, courtyards, colonnades, varied color palettes and materials and demonstrates an acute understanding of the design elements of Spanish/Mission Revival and Monterey Revival style architecture, as required by CDP The Inn at the Mission s site plan and building architecture essentially create a development plan that effectively manages the mass and bulk of proposed buildings. The project s proposed restaurant building is located along Ortega Highway and provides a varied building mass with wood railings and columns that are located on the exterior of the building.
6 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 The project design provides varied setbacks with second story building masses setback to reduce the visual mass. Balconies, dormers, eaves and similar architectural features have been incorporated to create visual interest. The project s design conveys a sense of richness of detail and is evoked on the building elevation designs, which provide material and colors that indicate that the proposed project will use earth-tone colors and suitable building materials consistent with the architectural design. The proposed buildings include integrated tower elements and architectural projections that add visual interest to the building rooflines. Roofmounted equipment will be screened at least partially from off-site views. The project includes conceptual landscape plans with a landscape palette that incorporates a California native/friendly plant selection and relies on a combination of formal and natural plant groupings to accent entrances, visually buffer building massing and retaining walls, screen parking, and enhance courtyards and semipublic spaces. Furthermore, the project will be consistent with the adopted Architectural Design Guidelines because the following design principles are applicable to the proposed project: Design Issue/ Principal 1: Human Scale. The proposed project has a wellbalanced pedestrian orientation and human scale. The project provides architectural features such as balconies, arches, window awnings and varied wall and roof planes that provide for architectural articulation that break-up the building mass. The pedestrian circulation experience is enhanced with the plaza area that is located at the southwest corner of the site, enhanced paving throughout the pedestrian corridors of the site and landscaping along the interior paseo and perimeter of the project. Design Issue/ Principle 2: Eclectic Building Styles. The applicant proposes a Spanish/Mission Revival and Monterey Revival style theme, which incorporates architectural elements that will allow the proposed development to architecturally exist amongst the adjacent buildings that are located within the downtown area. Design Issue/ Principal 5: Heritage and Tradition. The proposed design of the buildings is reflected in the history and tradition of San Juan Capistrano. The buildings contain arched and overhead balconies with heavy timber support columns that are reminiscent of the western-type architecture. The proposed landscaping design provides a tree palette found locally and in the vicinity of the Mission. The applicant has submitted a Historical Depiction Program (HDP) pursuant to City Council Policy 606 that is designed to depict the history of El Camino Real The King s Highway, which consists of Brass Plaques on a stone pedestal. Design Issue/Principle 6: Richness of Details and Materials. The applicant proposes to incorporate earth-tone colors to enhance the architectural details of the project. The applicant also proposes to install landscaping along the perimeter of all buildings, and along the interior paseo between the hotel and
7 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 the restaurant building, and integrated with enhanced paving which will enhance the overall pedestrian experience, which is consistent with the Architectural Design Guidelines, which provide, Unarticulated and solid wall surfaces degrade the quality of the pedestrian experience. Buildings facing pedestrian streets and plazas should incorporate design features that provide visual interest at the street and plaza levels. The outdoor plaza will provide visual interest with a fountain and mature trees; and will complement the existing pedestrian experience. Design Issue/ Principle 8: Linkages and Connections. The proposed pedestrian circulation design allows for hotel users to access the restaurant building via a paseo and with a connection to the plaza area, which will provide a place for sitting, congregating and waiting. The plaza will include a fountain, enhanced paving, landscaping and seating and will provide an inviting outdoor social experience for visitors and pedestrians that travel to and from the downtown area. 5. The site plan provides functional and safe vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access and circulation because the site development concept provides a continuous access drive through the parking lot via three previously approved site access driveways at Ortega Highway, Spring Street, and El Camino Real. Pedestrian access to the Hotel building from the parking lot is also provided via a sidewalk at the east section of the parking lot. All surface parking is designed to include landscaping to visually buffer views from the adjoining streets. Pedestrian linkages through the plaza into the project site are proposed to include landscape area and lighting. 6. The proposed use and design of the project are compatible with surrounding existing and proposed land uses and community character, including scale, intensity, massing, architectural design, landscape design, and other development characteristics because the proposed project design relies on the use of varied roof and building lines, alternative building massing, courtyards, colonnades, varied color palettes and materials consistent with the design elements of Spanish/Mission Revival and Monterey Revival style architecture and is architecturally compatible with similarly designed buildings within the downtown area. Finally, the landscape design provides effective and creative use of a California native/friendly plant palette to provide buffering, enhancement, separation, and security. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano hereby approves Architectural Control (AC) , subject to those applicable conditions of approval established in the Administrative Record, specifically City Council Resolution # However, Architectural Control (AC) shall not be effective unless and until the related Grading Plan Modification (GPM) and Amendment to the Plaza Banderas Hotel Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) are approved. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings
8 PC Resolution July 26, 2016 are based are located at San Juan Capistrano City Hall, Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, California The Development Services Director is the custodian of the record of proceedings. PROTEST OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the applicant may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this development project by taking the necessary steps and following the procedures established by Sections through of the California Government Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July, Mark Speros, Chairman Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services Director/Secretary
PC RESOLUTION NO GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 16-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 16-006,
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: Cultural Heritage Commission Development Services Department Reviewed & Submitted by: Sergio Klotz, Assistant Development Services Director ~
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-01-14-02 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP fttm) 17441. REZONE {RZ) 13-003, ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 13-003, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP) 13-052. GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 13-002. CONDITIONAL
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM E2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Development Services Department Submitted by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Director ~ Prepared by: Laura
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP) 10-01, PLAZA BANDERAS HOTEL & MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
C RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- AMENDMENT TO COMREHENSIVE DEVELOMENT LAN (CD) 10-01, LAZA BANDERAS HOTEL & MIXED USE DEVELOMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAISTRANO, CALIFORNIA
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F1 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Development Services Department Submitted and Reviewed by Sergio Klotz, Al~ rector~ Prepared by Mathew Evans,
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: Design Review Committee Development Services Department Reviewed and Submitted by: David Contreras, Senior Planner ~ _1)/} Prepared by: Laura
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationBuildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.
6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the
More informationHISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012
HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012 REQUESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR); and, Approval of General Plan
More informationCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN
More informationResidential Design Guidelines
Residential Design Guidelines Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines Introduction These guidelines seek to provide property owners, designers and developers with a clear understanding of the City
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO : Planning Commission FROM: Development Services Department ~ Submitted by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Director~ Prepared by: Paul Garcia, Associate
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationFuture Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion
Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process
More informationZONING: C-1-T. PARKING PROVIDED On-Site Valet 51 On-Site Holman Dedicated 14 Off-Site Valet TOTAL 113. (Mechanical Lifts)
BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS REFERENCE CODES 0 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 0 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE OCCUPANCY USE AND CLASSIFICATION SECTION 0 & THE PROPOSED BUILDING CONSISTS OF STORIES OF OVER STORY OF VALET
More informationResolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003
Resolution 03-011: Exhibit A Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Adopted March 2003 1 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted
More informationWINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES
WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationIII. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES The City of Manhattan Beach is located in the South Bay region of Los Angeles County, California, approximately 2 miles south of the Los Angeles International
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM 01 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report Planning Commission Development Services Department ~ ~ Submitted by: Sergio Klotz, Acting Develop en Services Directo Prepared
More informationWalnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25
C. General Design Criteria Part Three DRAFT 0/6/ III - 5 Frontage Types Frontage is a semi-public transition zone at the ground level where public and private realms meet. An understanding of various frontage
More informationELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES
......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008
Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:
More informationApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-016; Final Planned Unit Development Arden Plaza;
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationThe Highway Overlay District applies to an area within the City of Papillion's zoning jurisdiction described as:
ARTICLE XXVIII. HOD Highway Overlay District 205-164. Intent. The Highway Overlay District recognizes the strategic importance of the Highway 370 corridor as an entrance to Papillion from Interstate 80
More informationConcrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments.
Avila Ranch Concrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments Simple Trim Figure B-22: Craftsman Architectural Style Low
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015
Planning Commission Staff Report Project: 99 Cents Only Store File: EG-14-018 Request: General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Design Review Location: 8945 Brown Road; northeast corner of Elk Grove-Florin
More informationExecutive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation
Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation HEARING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2015 Date: July 30, 2015 Case No.: 2011.0409PCA Project Address: 925 Mission Street and various parcels (aka 5M ) Existing Zoning:
More informationCHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN
CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN CHAPTER FIVE - COMMUNITY DESIGN Assumptions Frazier Park and Lebec have historically developed according to different patterns of spatial form. While both communities are
More informationB. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks
B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks Figure IV.4 A rational block pattern with connected streets Introduction The single most important element in the physical and functional integration of mixed use
More informationARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE MEREDITH PLANNING BOARD BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS
DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS PURPOSE STATEMENT Architectural Design Review Design Guidelines provides architectural guidance intended to support
More informationA RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 16-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING
More informationThe broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.
Memorandum To: Emily Fultz, AICP City Planner, City of Edwardsville From: Michael Blue, FAICP Principal, Teska Associates Date: January 24, 2019 RE: B-1 Zoning District Update A draft, updated B-1 Central
More informationU.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description
U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District 1. General Purpose and Description The purpose of the U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District is to implement the recommendations within the U.S. Highway 377 North
More informationINTRODUCTION CURRENT APPLICATION
05/01805/FUL & 05/01807/LBC ERECTION OF A SINGLE DWELLING HOUSE WITH ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION AT Flamingo Zoological Gardens, Olney Road, Weston Underwood FOR Mr A J Crowther (as amended by letter dated
More informationWide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials
Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open
More informationCITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 2017 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Sara Farrell, Assistant Planner RE: Development Plan Review DR 16-05 The Laundry Room
More informationMIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES
MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES In addition to the development regulations contained in the Mixed-Use Zoning District, design guidelines are presented here to provide an added level of definition
More informationSTAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Holly Smyth, Planning Director Conduct Public Hearing
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Development Services Department ~ ~ Submitted by: William A. Ramsey, AI P, Assistant Directo Prepared by: Laura Stokes,
More informationDRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:
AUGUST 29, 2017 12.15 Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 12.15.1 Goals 12.15.2 Land Use The goals of this Plan are to: 12.15.2.1 General Provisions: a) Ensure the development of a compact
More informationThe Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN
The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations
More informationChapter 4: Jordan Road Character District
4: Jordan Road Character District 4.1 Introduction The Jordan Road character district encompasses much of the former Jordan orchard and farmstead, which was a significant part of Sedona s history. The
More informationPINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002
BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002 WHAT THE PROJECT IS AND IS NOT A Rezoning establishes the land use standards for Annexed and Zoned Greater Downtown District Historic Center September
More informationTOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: October 11, 2011
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: October 11, 2011 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD David A. Williams, AICP, Planning Division Manager Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Architecture
More informationARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
More informationDesign Guidelines Checklist
Design Guidelines Checklist A quick reference to the City of Vista Design Guidelines City of Vista Community Development Department Planning Division 600 Eucalyptus Avenue Vista, CA 92084 760.639.6100
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationAppendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The continuous and desirable improvement of Arnprior requires a clear understanding of what is envisioned for the Town. These Design
More informationCOMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION INTRODUCTION These guidelines were prepared in response to the needs of many users: developers, property owners, architects,
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017-16 GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE,
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationCITY OF GARDEN CITY. Garden City Design Review Committee Staff Contact: Chris Samples STAFF REPORT: DSRFY Page 1
Page 1 CITY OF GARDEN CITY 6015 Glenwood Street Garden City, Idaho 83714 Phone (208)472-2921 Fax (208)472-2926 File Number: DSRFY2018-12 For: Brilliant Services - New Commercial Structure Location: 211
More informationPentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3
Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3 CPHD April 23, 2015 Meeting Agenda Overview of approved Phase I Site Plan Review of relevant design guidelines Presentation of current proposal
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2018- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BELMONT APPROVING A SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A VACANT LOT ON LOWER LOCK AVENUE (APN: 043-042-750,
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORT December 4, 2014 AGENDA ITEM 8.A. 14-0138; ALTAMURA
More information4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon
4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial
More informationPLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Casey Stewart; 801-535-6260 Date: November 4, 2016 Re: PLNPCM2015-00874 Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking
More information(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4
. General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the
More informationChapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District
5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District 5.1 Introduction The Mixed Use Neighborhood character district acts as a transition or bridge between the State Route 89A District s commercial area to the
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Concept review on a legislative application to rezone land located at approximately 1750
More informationD1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture
More informationPLANNING STAFF REVIEW
Rezoning Petition 2016-087 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis October 17, 2016 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-3 (single family residential), O-1(CD) (office, conditional), and INST (institutional) Proposed Zoning:
More informationRESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING THE MONTGOMERY 7 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL PROJECT 565 LORRAINE AVENUE ADDENDUM TO THE DIRIDON STATION AREA PLAN FINAL
More informationVILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT
VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT PETITION INFORMATION Docket # C-226 Staff Megan Ledbetter Petitioner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Owner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Subject Property 5892-49-1766
More informationLITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES
LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES Littleton Center Design Guidelines 1 I. DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS These Design Guidelines have been initially created by Hallin Family LLC (the "Developer"), and govern all
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationWelcome! to Keller Town Hall
Welcome! to Keller Town Hall Keller Town Center Planning a New Downtown What is Keller Town Center? A new, growing downtown district planned as an urban village A combination of retail and office spaces,
More informationBe it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:
Local Law No. 4 of 2018 (Adoption of 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development District) Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development
More informationSite Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23
The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown
More informationDRAFT. 10% Common Open Space
% OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity
More informationKEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan
Richmond Official Community Plan BROADMOOR AREA SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN Bylaw 7100 Schedule 2.6C SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN KEY MAP
More informationSPECIFIC PLAN Requirements
CITY OF LANCASTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, California 93534 (661) 723-6100 SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements Purpose The purpose of a specific plan is to provide for the logical development
More informationCITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET
CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE Prior to the actual filing of a Master Plan application, it is strongly recommended that the applicant contact Planning
More informationCounty of Loudoun. Department of Planning MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: ZMOD , Dulles North Business Park Comprehensive Sign Plan, 2 nd Referral
County of Loudoun Department of Planning MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2014 TO: FROM: Ginny Rowen, Project Manager Land Use Review Pat Giglio, Planner III Community Planning SUBJECT: ZMOD 2013-0001, Dulles
More informationHistoric District Commission
Historic District Commission Page 1 of 26 Staff Report June 6 th, 2018 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS / OLD BUSINESS: Administrative Approvals: 1. 238 Deer Street - Recommend Approval 2. 59 Sheafe Street - Recommend
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationAWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning
More informationSOUTHEAST ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY STANDARDS DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance amending Title 22 Planning and Zoning of the Los Angeles County
SOUTHEAST ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY STANDARDS DISTRICT Revised 2.7.07 ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance amending Title 22 Planning and Zoning of the Los Angeles County Code to establish the Southeast Antelope
More informationA. OVERVIEW, GOALS, AND GUIDELINES III - 1 PART THREE FINAL 02/20/13 WALNUT CREEK TRANSIT VILLAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. OVERVIEW, GOALS, AND GUIDELINES III - OVERVIEW, GOALS, AND GUIDELINES OVERVIEW The Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines for the Private Realm addresses site-specific urban design recommendations,
More information4.6 LAND USE. b. Regulatory Setting. The Specific Plan area includes the following General Plan land use designations, as shown in Figure 2-3:
4.6 LAND USE 4.6.1 Environmental Setting a. Existing Land Uses. The Specific Plan area, located in the center of the City in the downtown core area, consists of about 50 square blocks radiating from the
More information14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC
14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC PROPERTY OWNER: MUNDEN & ASSOCIATES, LP STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-1 & AG-2 to Conditional O-2) ADDRESS
More informationWEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 Agenda Report TO: FROM : Design Review Committee Development Services Department Submitted by: David Contreras, Senior Planner 00, Prepared by: Sergio Klotz, Assistant Development Services Director
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Map to add a new section of North Kansas
More informationsection five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN
section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN BEAUTIFICATION PLAN Section Five Beautification Plan The goal of the Beautification Plan is to improve the Route 8-Sunnyland Corridor in terms of aesthetics and to create
More informationJoint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009
Joint Study Session of the Sutter County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission March 2, 2009 CURRENT APPLICATION General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Specific Plan Appendices Utility Plans Transit/AQ
More informationTown of Essex Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown Harrow and Essex Centre May 2014
Town of Essex Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown Harrow and Essex Centre May 2014 1 Table of Contents Section 1.0 Purpose and Intent.3 Section 2.0 Streetscapes 4 Section 3.0 Active and Inviting Streetscapes..5
More information