Marion County Board of County Commissioners
|
|
- Stewart Fox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Marion County Board of County Commissioners Office of the County Engineer 412 SE 25th Ave. Ocala, FL Phone: Fax: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE A G E N D A April 16, :00 AM 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADOPT THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: April 2, CONSENT AGENDA: STAFF HAS REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL A. DOLLAR GENERAL OCALA/US HWY 441 MAJOR SITE PLAN 7080 S PINE AVE OCALA Project # #7680 Parcel # Permit # Causseaux, Hewett, & Walpole 4. SCHEDULED ITEMS: A. DUNN DENTAL OFFICE MAJOR SITE PLAN Project # #6738 Parcel # Mastroserio Engineering Applicant requests extension to retain active status. B. CLEMENTS BUSINESS COMPLEX MAJOR SITE PLAN Project # #5096 Parcel # S2A Engineering Applicant requests extension to retain active status. C. OCALA CROSSINGS NORTH PUD - REZONING 4390 SW 80TH ST OCALA Project # #7041 Parcel # & Gray, Ackerman & Haines
2 Development Review Committee Agenda April 16, 2012 D. OCALA CROSSINGS SOUTH PUD - REZONING 4390 SW 80TH ST OCALA Project # #7042 Parcel # & Gray, Ackerman & Haines 5. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW ITEMS: None 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS: None 7. OTHER ITEMS: 8. ADJOURNED: 2
3 Development Review Committee Minutes April 2, 2012 MEMBERS PRESENT: Tracy Straub (Chairman); Mounir Bouyounes at 9:05 a.m. Paul Nevels (Vice Chairman) Chris Rison (Planning) Sam Martsolf (Zoning) Flip Mellinger (Utilities) OTHERS PRESENT: Dana Taylor (Legal) Justin Ryan (Planning) Jim Couillard (Parks) Alfreada Harmon (911) Paul Wildman (Office of the County Engineer) Brian Snyder (Office of the County Engineer) Bert Yancey (Office of the County Engineer) Stephanie Galarza (Office of the County Engineer) Carla Sansone (Office of the County Engineer) Wendy Walters (Office of the County Engineer) Tracy Straub called the Development Review Committee to order at 9:00 am. 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADOPT THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: March 26, 2012 Motion by Sam Martsolf to approve, seconded by Chris Rison Motion carried CONSENT AGENDA: None 4. SCHEDULED ITEMS: A. PETITION TO CLOSE NW 49TH AVE & NW 17TH PL ROADS IN OCALA PALMS UNIT 1 Doug Iannarelli - Moorhead Engineering Company Motion by Sam Martsolf to recommend approval of the abandonment of the road subject to (1) retaining an easement for utilities; (2) retaining an easement for whatever drainage provisions were established with Unit 1 or whichever unit is involved with the roadway; (3) allowing parallel access to the three lots southeast of the intersection, east of 49th Avenue; and (4) providing maintenance to convert this to private maintenance of those easements by Ocala Palms, seconded by Paul Nevels Motion carried 4-1 with Chris Rison voting in opposition
4 DRC Minutes April 2, 2012 Page 2 of 3 B. MARION COUNTY SILVER SPRINGS SHORES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT WAIVER REQUEST 450 EMERALD RD OCALA Project # #7921 Parcel # Todd Crosby - London Engineering & Associates L.D.C. Section d (8) - DRA 12' Wide Maintenance Berm CODE states drainage retention/detention basins or areas, either public or private, shall have side slopes no steeper than 4:1 (horizontal:vertical) with a 12 foot stabilized vehicle access at six percent grade maximum. APPLICANT requests waiver to provide a 5 foot wide berm instead of the 12 foot wide berm due to the location near the property line. Motion by Chris Rison to approve the 5 berm, seconded by Sam Martsolf Motion carried 5-0 C. MARION COUNTY SILVER SPRINGS SHORES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MAJOR SITE PLAN 450 EMERALD RD OCALA Project # #7624 Parcel # Todd Crosby - London Engineering & Associates Motion by Chris Rison to approve, seconded by Paul Nevels Motion carried 5-0 D. DECHAMPLAIN PROPERTY, SUZANNE WAIVER REQUEST NW HWY 225A REDDICK Project # #7889 Parcel # Kevin McCall - KJM Construction L.D.C. Section a (1) (a) - Major Site Plan Submittal CODE states if collectively, all existing and proposed impervious surfaces exceed 35 percent of the gross site area, or if existing and proposed impervious surfaces collectively include 9,000 or more square feet of ground coverage a drainage plan shall be submitted. APPLICANT requests waiver to install 140 x 250 farm building with gutters on entire building and 20 downspouts with 3 x3 x3 stone in ground on all 20 downspouts for drainage. There are no buildings within 500 feet in any direction. Motion by Sam Martsolf to approve subject to a stormwater inspection and meeting any requirements as a result of that inspection, seconded by Chris Rison Motion carried 5-0 E. TRI COUNTY WORSHIP CENTER - WAIVER REQUEST 8780 SE 157TH PL SUMMERFIELD Project # #7919 Parcel # Permit # Alan Melton - Cross State Construction
5 DRC Minutes April 2, 2012 Page 3 of 3 TRI COUNTY WORSHIP CENTER - WAIVER REQUEST CONTINUED L.D.C. Section k (7) - Buffering CODE states, when required, every development shall provide sufficient buffering when topographical or other barriers do not provide reasonable screening and when the Board determines that there is a need to shield neighboring properties from any adverse external effects of a development. APPLICANT requests waiver to install a 5-6 foot high wood or white vinyl fence in lieu of landscape buffer due to budget constraints. There is existing fence on a portion of the east property line and also well established trees throughout the proposed buffers. Motion by Sam Martsolf to approve provided that a 6 opaque privacy type fence is installed along the east and west boundaries, at least to the extent of the development, and the existing trees will then serve as the tree requirement in the buffer, seconded by Chris Rison Motion carried CONCEPTUAL REVIEW ITEMS: None 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS: None 7. OTHER ITEMS: None 8. ADJOURNED: 9:49 a.m. Attest: Mounir Bouyounes, P.E., Chairman Carla Sansone, Plans Coordinator
6 APRIL 11, 2012 DANIEL YOUNG CAUSSEAUX, HEWETT, & WALPOLE 6011 NW 1ST PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL PROJECT NAME: DOLLAR GENERAL OCALA/US HWY 441 PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION NUMBER: 7680 Dear Daniel: The above referenced project was reviewed by Development Review staff and the following informational comments are for your review. You need not reply to the comments, and if the comments have been previously completed, simply disregard. Your plan will be scheduled for approval by the Development Review Committee on April 16, This item will be on the consent agenda and attendance is not required. 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 37. Provide copy of FDEP's Construction Generic Permit (CGP) for NPDES or (NOI). STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: Demonstrate compliance with FDEP's NPDES by providing a copy of the permit or NOI prior to construction. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Legal Documents STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: Provide the following executed documents for review and approval prior to CO: 1. sidewalk covenant 2. parallel access covenant showing cross parallel access to the north & south 3. public ingress/egress easement Please contact Carla Sansone in Development Review at (352) to obtain the necessary documents.
7
8 DRC Minutes October 10, 2011 B. DUNN DENTAL OFFICE MAJOR SITE PLAN Project # #6738 Parcel # Shawn Hubbuck Initial review comments. Applicant requests extension for resubmittal time frame. Motion by Sam Martsolf to recognize all the staff comments and the applicant s willingness to comply with those comments and extend the time to resubmit to 60 days, seconded by Jimmy Massey Motion carried 4-0 DRC Minutes January 9, 2012 A. DUNN DENTAL OFFICE MAJOR SITE PLAN Project # #6738 Parcel # Paolo Mastroserio - Mastroserio Engineering Applicant requests extension to retain active status. Motion by Jimmy Massey to grant the extension for 90 days from today s date, seconded by Flip Mellinger Motion carried 5-0
9 Marion County Board of County Commissioners Office of the County Engineer 412 SE 25th Ave. Ocala, FL Phone: Fax: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT STAFF MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 6, :30 a.m. A. DUNN DENTAL OFFICE MAJOR SITE PLAN Project # #6738 Parcel # Mastroserio Engineering 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 37. Provide copy of FDEP's Construction Generic Permit (CGP) for NPDES or (NOI). REMARKS: Demonstrate compliance with FDEP's NPDES requirements by providing a copy of the permit or NOI. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Waivers listed on cover sheet (if applicable). REMARKS: Add waivers if requested in the future. cs 3. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Application fee. REMARKS: The application fee is due when this plan is resubmitted (if a resubmittal is necessary). Refer to Resolution 10-R-630 for the current fee schedule. Additionally, please include a separate review fee for $40.00 made payable to the Marion County Health Department. cs 4. DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: 10. Correct road names supplied REMARKS: Note: incorrect road name of State Road 200 on all pages. Correct road name is SW Hwy 200. Please correct on any future submissions. Becky Passage, Management
10 5. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 22. Pipe conveyance calculations 25yr-24hr event with a 25yr-24hr tailwater. REMARKS: Please provide conveyance calculations that demonstrate the system has the capacity for the 25 YR 24 HR storm event with a 25 YR 24 HR tailwater condition as it connects to the existing system structure "D-4" (HGL = +/-62.93) as identified in the Bridlewood Crossing Plans. Please note that the as-builts indicate an existing 18" RCP stub out at the connection location. 6. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 23. Pipe calculation reports labeled with identifiers related to the plans. REMARKS: Pending calculations. 7. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (1) (d) - Sidewalks REMARKS: 9/28/2011: Please provide wheel stops for the parking spaces adjacent to the walkway along the NE side of the building or widen the walkway to 7'. 8. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: All sheets 24" X 36" and identified as "Major Site Plan". REMARKS: Plan not identified as "Major Site Plan". cs 9. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Plans signed by owner & signed and sealed by engineer/surveyor. REMARKS: Plans must be signed and sealed by engineer/surveyor prior to final approval. cs 10. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Boundary survey submitted. REMARKS: please provide a signed and sealed survey prior to plan approval. 11. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Required engineer's/surveyor's certification. REMARKS: Please provide signed and sealed plans for final approval 12. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Water Management District permit (if applicable). REMARKS: 13. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Environmental Assessment for Listed Species Provided? [FLUE 4.16/CE 2.22] REMARKS: An updated Environmental Assessment for Listed Species (EALS) is required as the prior EALS os a mumber of years old, and the site has been cleared in advance which may have also attracted known LS to the site. 2
11 14. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Access Management - Are Sidewalks Provided? [TE 4.2 & LDC Section a.(1)(d)] REMARKS: Revise the plan to provide a sidewalk connection from the building to the SR 200 sidewalk. It is recommended that the landscape islands in the parking row along Hwy 200 be shifted one space south and the southern island widened to include the sidewalk segment that can then align with the handicapped parking aisle facing the building. 15. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Developer's Agreement REMARKS: The site is part of a larger site subject to a Developer's Aggrement. Revise the plan data (right side of cover sheet) to add that the site is subject to a Developer's Agreement recorded at OR Book Pages DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. A signed, sealed and dated boundary and topographic survey of the site meeting Florida Minimum Technical Standards Florida Administrate code (61G17-1) and Florida Statutes Chapter 472, being no more than six months old. REMARKS: Survey not signed or sealed. 17. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 4. A minimum of two vertical benchmarks shown on project site with datum noted. REMARKS: No benchmarks shown. 18. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: e (2)(a) - Trees to be preserved require plan changes REMARKS: The encroachment under 30" and 40" Oaks is excessive. 19. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: f (2)(a) - Tree protection barricades REMARKS: Tree protection barricades must be shown at the dripline of each tree or groups of trees to be saved. Use a desktop canopy rule of 1' radius for each inch of DBH size. Barricades may be temporarily removed to work within dripline as long as the barricades are reinstalled after work is complete. 20. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: g (1) - Smallest grade change possible around existing trees REMARKS: Approximately 1.84' of fill is proposed on top of 10", 30", and 40" Oaks is unacceptable. Use tree wells or small retaining walls to protect root zone. 21. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (5)(f) - Fifty percent all vegetation (less grass) native plants suitable for site REMARKS: Only 46% native vegetation provided. Code requires 50%. 3
12 22. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (6)(c) - Shade tree specifications REMARKS: Shade trees shall have a minimum of 2 1/2" DBH. 23. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (7)(c)i - Screening of garbage collection and utility areas REMARKS: Show garbage collection area screening on landscape plan and account for required landscape material and irrigation accordingly. 4
13 ENGIN - Shawn Hubbuck ( ) ENGDRN -Paul Wildman ( ) ENGTRF - Brian Snyder ( ) ENGSUR - Jerry Gowen ( ) LUCURR - Chris Rison ( ) ZONE2 - Bob Johnson ( ) DOH - Dan Dooley ( ) FRMSH - Angie Sweeney ( ) ( ) UTIL - Todd Petrie ( ) LSCAPE - Jim Couillard ( ) NOVEMBER 24, 2010 S2A ENGINEERING AMIN SHAHEED 1469 N MAGNOLIA AVE STE F1 OCALA, FL PROJECT NAME: CLEMENTS BUSINESS COMPLEX PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION NO: 5096 Dear Amin: This letter is in regard to your recent submittal for the above referenced project. During the process of reviewing the plans for sufficiency, some items were found which must be addressed. Please respond to the following staff comments requiring correction and/or revision within 180 days. To request an extension of the 180 days from the Development Review Committee, please submit a written request prior to the expiration date. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Access Management - Cross/Parallel Access Required? [TE 4.2 & LDC Section a(2)(e)] STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: Provide Parallel Access along NE 36th Avenue unless suitable LDC Waivers are obtained. Staff notes that according to the plan, a waiver request is pending; however staff understands parallel access exists on adjacent parcel and staff would be reluctant to support a full waiver of parallel access requirements. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Final Review Pending the following LDC Waiver Requests Per Site Plan: STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: 1) Sidewalks 2) Minimum Driveway Access 3) Section Line Roads 4) DRA Maintenance Berm 5) Parallel Access 1
14 DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Tree Calculations STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: Tree Calculations for this site are as follows: 1. Retain or replace native trees equal to a minimum of 100 inches DBH per acre; or up to pre-development inches per acre. 2. One shade tree (2 1/2" DBH min.) per 3,000 square feet of site area. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 1. Soils Map with site outline shown. REMARKS: Please provide a legend on the soils map. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. Submitted curve numbers reflect the soil conditions in the field. REMARKS: Please clarify how the pond bottom is being addressed in the CN calculations. Has this area been modeled as impervious? DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 9. Watershed Basin boundary line. REMARKS: Please further evaluate the watershed basin to the north. Will upstream off-site runoff contribute to this proposed system? USGS quad map indicates 85' contour elevation to the north and plans only indicate +/-40' north of the north property line with a 74' contour elevation. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 10. Time of concentration calculations and show the hydraulic length for each basin. REMARKS: Provide Time of Concentration calculations for pre/post design. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 14. Pond holds the post development volume if in problem area. REMARKS: Pending CN revisions. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 15. Pond recovers volume in 14 days. REMARKS: Plans indicate 14 day drawdown in hours and reference the Modret calculations. Marion County Modret calculations were not found, please provide. 2
15 DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 16. Private retention/detention pond maintenance sign. REMARKS: DRA sign detail has been provided and is satisfactory; however, the location of the sign has not been identified. Please indicate the location on the plans. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 17. Pond detail cross-sections showing DHWL 100yr - 24hr event and the SHGWT. REMARKS: Pond bottom in typical sections are indicated to be seeded and mulched. Per new springs protection requirements please revise the notes to indicate the pond bottom to have vegetative cover. (Sod) DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 20. Pond maintenance berm 12' 4:1 slope or flatter, 15' for 3:1 slope or steeper. REMARKS: Provide a 12' maintenance berm around the pond or seek waiver. Typical minimum width recommended to DRC is 5' should applicant seek waiver. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 34. Specifically state the amount of lot specific impervious designed for. REMARKS: Clarify total impervious area as cover indicates 19, SF, while the summation of coverage's indicates 22, SF. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 35. Provide for construction entrance erosion control. REMARKS: Please indicate the construction entrance location and controls as needed. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 39. Springs Protection Elements REMARKS: Please provide a BMP maintenance document as required for Springs Projection. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 40. Stormwater REMARKS: Pre-development CN values are including existing impervious areas. Please revise to evaluate only "pre-development conditions" as naturally occurring. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 41. Stormwater REMARKS: HydroCAD has been used for modeling and questions remain in regards to the following: percolation rates and aquifer input data, terms such as discarded and summary results. Please discuss these items with stormwater to address. 3
16 DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 42 Stormwater REMARKS: Provide a discharge structure as this design will not retain the entire post development 100 year 24 hour design storm with rate and volume discharge values. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (1) (d) - Sidewalks REMARKS: 11/18/2010: Please acquire waiver for the future sidewalk adjacent to NE 36th Ave. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (2) - Design Criteria REMARKS: 11/18/2010: Parallel access easement is shown in a 2001 Major Site Plan for American Fire & Safety Equipment which is located directly south of this site. Please provide parallel access that connects to this easement. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (9) - Sign and Pavement Markings REMARKS: 11/18/2010: 1) Please have the diagonal striping adjacent to the existing building striped toward the direction of travel. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: All sheets 24" X 36" and identified as "Major Site Plan". REMARKS: 11/12/10 - Remove the word "improvement". DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Sheets numbered and cross referenced. REMARKS: 11/12/10 - The landscape plan is listed on the index but was only provided with 3 plans. All plans should be complete sets. cs DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Waivers listed on cover sheet (if applicable). REMARKS: 11/12/10 - Waivers are listed but have not been requested as of this date. cs DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Name & address and signature of owner/applicant. REMARKS: 11/12/10 - Plans not signed by owner. cs 4
17 DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Boundary survey submitted. REMARKS: DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Required Surveyor's Certification signed/sealed. REMARKS: DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Recording of easements/deeds. REMARKS: DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Water Management District permit (If applicable). REMARKS: DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Sidewalks REMARKS: Please provide or obtain appropriate waiver DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Parallel Access REMARKS: Please provide or obtain appropriate waiver DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Recording of Access Easement REMARKS: DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Springs Protection Design Required (If YES - ADD SPZ CHECKLIST) REMARKS: 1) Revise the plan to include a prominant note that states the following: "This project is located within the Silver Springs Primary Protection Zone." 2) The plan must clearly demonstrate compliance with the applicable spring protection zone standards. This is a significant concern in relation to the planned outdoor storage area and potential rainfall run-off conditions and characteristics. 5
18 DEPARTMENT: ZONE2-2ND LEVEL OF REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: All applicable requirements of Article 9 and the LDC have been met. REMARKS: 1) List of required regulatory approvals, or permits. (county, state such as W.M.D., D.E.P., D.O.H. and D.O.T.) Article 9 item 20 2) On the cover sheet list of waivers and/or variances required or requested. (Article 9 item 22) 3) Type "E" buffer along NE 36th ave - call out contents - 4 trees per linear 100' and a double staggered hedge row. 4) No buffering required along the east, north and south property lines as they abut B5 zoning 5) 6.4 karst feature protection -(a) Submittal Documents. An applicant for new development or expansion of existing development shall submit a signed and sealed site plan, to scale, which shall depict Karst features on the project site and off-site within 100 feet of the project boundary. Additional karst feature protections may be required ) Does this site require Fire Tank(s) or Fire wells) 7) SPZ Define what type of business / outside storage is proposed for the impervious area of the site. If it includes manufacturing and repair or storage of non serviceable machinery / equipment addition SPZ requirements will be required as stated in section. 8) statute (a)handicapped 44" walk isle All spaces must be located on an accessible route no less than 44 inches wide so that users will not be compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. 9) (b) Each space must be located on the shortest safely accessible route from the parking space to an accessible entrance. If there are multiple entrances or multiple retail stores, the parking spaces must be dispersed to provide parking at the nearest accessible entrance. 10) Show and record "cross access easement" along NE 36th ave (comp plan collector) 11) Sidewalks (Commercial External) provided or waiver, in all property within urban commercial and industrial areas d- DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: e (1) - Tree locations and tree calculations REMARKS: Update calculations to reflect the correct ratios and replacement (if needed). DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: g (3) - Swaling and minor grades changes to be outside of dripline REMARKS: Drainage swale does affect root zone of 14" DBL Oak. Provide root protection/recovery notes for this area. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: B 6(b) - Buffer required REMARKS: Refer to Zoning comments pertaining to buffer along NE 36th Ave. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(a)ii - Group plant types with similar care needs; hydrozone REMARKS: 'Fashion' Azalea have a higher water demand than adjacent proposed plant material. 6
19 DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(b) - Minimum landscape areas for non-residential development REMARKS: To receive a reduction in Landscape Area, use only native trees and plant material, drought tolerant plant material and FFL principles. See following comments on use of FFL. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(d) - Use of approved native or drought tolerant plants; fifty percent native species REMARKS: Only 45% of the proposed species are native. 'Little Gem' Magnolia, 'Weaver White' Dogwood and 'St. Luke' Plum are not native to Florida. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(d) - Use of Florida-Friendly Landscaping principles REMARKS: The 20% Landscape Area = 8,973.4sf 40% must be landscaped using FFL principles = 3,589.3sf Sod under trees will not be counted towards the FFL area. Other FFL issues to be addressed: 1. Plants being shown too close to buildings (offset rootball 2' - 3' away). 2. Bedlines are difficult to maintain. 3. Include trees in front of building into a bed for ease of maintenance. 4. Camelia tree will block access to north side of buliding and make turf management difficult. 5. Planting Myrtle Holly near powerlines, where space permits, may be acceptable however planting trees with a mature growth of 20' to 40' under powerlines is prohibited. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (6)(c) - Shade tree specifications REMARKS: Use shade trees to meet these requirements. Palms and ornamental trees should not be counted as shade trees. Due to the size of the Holly trees, they could be counted as shade trees however newly installed ornamental trees will not be counted. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (6)(d) - Post development ratio minimum one shade tree per 3,000 square feet REMARKS: Shade tree calculations require 15 shade trees. Five existing Oak trees and two existing Holly trees shall count towards this requirement. Provide eight new shade trees (2 1/2" DBH min.). DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (6)(f) - Location of trees conflict with utilities REMARKS: See previous comment about using trees under powerlines. 7
20 DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (7) - Buffering REMARKS: Refer to Zoning comments. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(h) - Landscape maintenance procedures REMARKS: Add note to plan: All landscape maintenance shall be in accordance with Marion County LDC Article k (1)(h) - Florida-Friendly Best Management Practices. Resubmittals must be complete, signed and sealed by the project engineer, project surveyor, and owner, if applicable, and folded not rolled. Please include a letter with the comments of the reviewers, an explanation to those comments, and on what page of the plan the corrections were made. When these items have been corrected, resubmit thirteen (13) plans to the Office of the County Engineer for process and review. Resubmittals will not be processed if incomplete. In the event these deficiencies are not corrected within 180 days or an extension granted by the Development Review Committee, this application shall become invalid and a new application must be submitted along with the appropriate fees. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Carla Sansone Plans Coordinator c: Sylvia Clements 8
21 DISCLAIMER: This is a work in progress. This application was compiled by the Marion County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. These are NOT surveys. Our goal is to provide the most accurate data available, however no warranties, expressed or implied, are provided with this data, its use, or interpretation. All information subject to change without notice. Use at your own risk.
22 DISCLAIMER: This is a work in progress. This application was compiled by the Marion County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. These are NOT surveys. Our goal is to provide the most accurate data available, however no warranties, expressed or implied, are provided with this data, its use, or interpretation. All information subject to change without notice. Use at your own risk.
23 PROJECT NAME: OCALA CROSSINGS NORTH PUD AKA BRADFORD FARMS PHASE 3-5 PUD REZONING PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION NUMBER: DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. Stormwater STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: The minimum width for drainage easements is 20'. Please consider this during design as the side setbacks would encroach into the drainage easement, as applicable. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: ZONING CHANGE STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: 12/5/2011: Approved, Traffic Section is ok with general location of collector roads. 3. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Rezoning STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: N/A 4. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 1.Stormwater STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH ADMINISTRATION ON AGREEMENT REMARKS: 3/22/12: At this time the plans and presented agreement cannot move forward with a recommendation of approval. References pertaining to the obligations of Marion County, which to the knowledge of stormwater, have not been agreed to or accepted must first be discussed and finalized prior to approval. Please schedule a meeting with the appropriate staff to discuss the developer's agreement and what obligations are agreed to by all parties involved. STATUS OF REVIEW: AGREED TO AMEND LANGUAGE FOR SHARED POND FACILITIES 11/22/11: Note 15.3 indicates potential drainage stub-outs to adjacent property. Please clarify note if this is only referring to utility stub-outs. If drainage stub-outs are proposed, this will require a discussion with staff prior to any approvals. 5. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Plan Notes STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH COUNTY ENGINEER & COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REMARKS: 3/30/12 - All notes obligating the County to any future construction or improvement shall be removed from the plans. Denied. The proposed plan notes addressing median openings, drainage retention areas and maintenance is not consistent with meetings between Transportation and the owner and owner representative. The roadway is 100% designed and permitted. 6. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Developer's Agreement STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH COUNTY ENGINEER & COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REMARKS: The proposed agreement is overreaching and obligating to the County to provide infrastructure and improvements that are not funded and may not be for a long time. Staff will not be in support of the agreement as proposed. The proposed agreement shall be revised to eliminate items obligating the County to provide infrastructure.
24 7. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Proposed PUD Uses & Densities are consistent with Land Use Designation? STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET/WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF REMARKS: Per LUA/DA agreement, the base density shall be calculated on the remaining acreage minus the R/W dedicated for SW 49th Ave (10.74 acres). Resulting maximum density is 715 total units. Revisiting this issue will require consideration in an advertised public hearing. 8. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Developer's Agreement for LUA/Zoning completed? STATUS OF REVIEW: THIS WILL BE DONE LATER WITH REVISED SUBMITTAL REMARKS: The Developer's Agreement must be finalized and recorded prior to PUD Master Plan approval. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - OR BOOK/PAGE: (PENDING). LUA GRANTED: 4/14/2011 (Found in Compliance) LUA CASE NUMBER: 08-L26 BCC APPROVAL DATE: 02/10/2011 PARCEL NUMBER: ACREAGE: OWNER NAME(S): Bradford Farms Ph 3 CONDITIONS: SEE LUA AGREEMENT 9. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Conceptual Review of Primary Development Requirements REMARKS: The following remarks are general in nature and provided regarding the conceptual plan submitted for review, wherein formal review will take place upon submission of the project's formal Master Plan: 1. Minimum Residential Density [FLUE Appendix A-5]: The Marion County Comprehensive Plan functionally establishes 3 dwelling units per acre as the minimum development density required for Medium Density Residential designated sites. The final Master Plan will need to reflect this minimum density requirement. 2. Environmental Assessment for Listed Species Provided? [FLUE 4.16/CE 2.23]: An Environmental Assessment for Listed Species will be required at the time the final Master Plan is submitted for DRC review processing. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 3. Springs Protection Zone/Design: The site is located in Marion County's Rainbow Springs Secondary Springs Protection Zone (SPZ). This zone type will need to be noted on the final Master Plan and subsequent plans, and the project design must comply with the applicable SPZ design standards. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 4. Wellhead Protection (NGAR & LDC Section ]: The proposed potable water well(s) will require identification and delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) on the final Master Plan and appropriate subsequent development plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: WAIVER REQUESTED 5. Access Management - Existing R/W, Functional Roads, Major Roads: The existing R/W widths for the abutting roadway network must be provided with the final Master Plan. The proposed SW 49th Avenue (Functional Collector), SW 80th & 90th Streets (Collector/Major Road), and Ocala Crossings Boulevard (Collector/Major Road) appear to provide a sufficient and complete street network coordinated with the surrounding area. A formal waiver will be required at address any other un-met Section/Quarter-Section R/W dedication requirements; however Planning staff would support such a waiver. 2
25 STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION ON FUTURE MASTER PLAN 6. Access Management - Internal/Interconnected Access/Parallel Access: The proposed Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network appear to provide sufficient access alternatives to address Interconnected and Parallel Access; however final review is subject to more detailed information required with the final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans. Direct access to the Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network by individual sites will be prohibited, particularly for individual residential developments; however some facilities may be authorized for access on a case-by-case basis to be further addressed by the final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION ON FUTURE MASTER PLAN 7. Access Management - Multi-modal: The final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans will need to provide for multi-modal access addressing pedestrian/sidewalk and bicycle access, particular given the public facilities and long-term commercial development opportunities in the surroundings. The Master Plan will need to establish location and design standards for the overall "multi-modal access network" which is then reflected by the project's subsequent phase plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 8. Concurrency Utilities: The project must be served by central water and central sewer service. 9. Concurrency Traffic (Access Improvements): Conveyance/establishment of the Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network roadways shown on the plan will be necessary, along with providing for any additional improvements indicated as necessary to support the development and/or its access needs (e.g., turn lanes at intersections, etc.). STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 10. Concurrency Deferral: The following note must be provided on the final Master Plan unless other suitable and acceptable arrangements are made: "This project has not been granted concurrency approval and/or granted and/or reserved any public facility capacities. Future rights to develop the resulting properties are subject to a deferred concurrency determination and final approval to develop the property has not been obtained. The completion of concurrency review and/or approval has been deferred to later development review stages, such as, but not limited to, Preliminary Plat, Improvement Plan, Final Plat, Site/Drainage Plan review and/or Building Permit review." 10. DEPARTMENT: UTIL - MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REVIEW ITEM: Comments - Response Required. STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REMARKS: Contact Marion County Utilities to discuss developers Agreement 3
26
27 PROJECT NAME: OCALA CROSSINGS SOUTH PUD AKA BRADFORD 159 P2 PUD - REZONING PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION NUMBER: DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. Stormwater STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: The minimum width for drainage easements is 20'. Please consider this during design as the side setbacks would encroach into the drainage easement, as applicable. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Rezoning STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: 12/5/2011: Approved, Traffic Section is ok with general location of collector roads. 3. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Rezoning STATUS OF REVIEW: INFO REMARKS: N/A 4. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 1. Stormwater STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH ADMINISTRATION ON AGREEMENT REMARKS: 3/22/12: At this time the plans and presented agreement cannot move forward with a recommendation of approval. References pertaining to the obligations of Marion County, which to the knowledge of stormwater, have not been agreed to or accepted must first be discussed and finalized prior to approval. Please schedule a meeting with the appropriate staff to discuss the developer's agreement and what obligations are agreed to by all parties involved. STATUS OF REVIEW: AGREED TO AMEND LANGUAGE FOR SHARED POND FACILITIES 11/22/11: Plan notes , 15.5, 15.7 and 15.8, which are related to stormwater, will need to be discussed with staff prior to approval of this concept plan. 5. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Plan Notes STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH COUNTY ENGINEER & COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REMARKS: 3/30/12 - All notes obligating the County to any future construction or improvement shall be removed from the plans. Denied. Plan notes are not consistent with comments from Transportation from previous meetings with owner and owner representative. Notes pertaining to medians, drainage retention areas, and maintenance needs revisions. The roadway is 100% designed and permitted. 6. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Developer's Agreement STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH COUNTY ENGINEER & COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REMARKS: The proposed agreement is overreaching and obligating to the County to provide infrastructure and improvements that are not funded and may not be for a long time. Staff will not be in support of the agreement as proposed. The proposed agreement shall be revised to eliminate items obligating the County to provide infrastructure.
28 7. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Proposed PUD Uses & Densities are consistent with Land Use Designation? STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET/WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF REMARKS: Per LUA/DA agreement, the base density shall be calculated on the remaining acreage minus the R/W dedicated for SW 49th Ave (32.74 acres). Resulting maximum density is 1346 total units. Revisiting this issue will require consideration in an advertised public hearing. 8. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Developer's Agreement for LUA/Zoning completed? STATUS OF REVIEW: THIS WILL BE DONE LATER WITH REVISED SUBMITTAL REMARKS: The Developer's Agreement must be finalized and recorded prior to PUD Master Plan approval. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - OR BOOK/PAGE: (PENDING). CONDITIONS SUMMARY - SEE LUA AGREEMENT FOR DETAILS. LUA GRANTED: 04/14/2011 LUA CASE NUMBER: 08-L27 and 08-L26 BCC APPROVAL DATE: 02/10/2011 PARCEL NUMBER: and (Portion of) ACREAGE: (08-L27) and (08-L26) OWNER NAME(S): Bradford 159 P2 LLC 9. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Conceptual Review of Primary Development Requirements REMARKS: The following remarks are general in nature and provided regarding the conceptual plan submitted for review, wherein formal review will take place upon submission of the project's formal Master Plan: 1. Minimum Residential Density [FLUE Appendix A-5]: The Marion County Comprehensive Plan functionally establishes 3 dwelling units per acre as the minimum development density required for Medium Density Residential designated sites. The final Master Plan will need to reflect this minimum density requirement. 2. Environmental Assessment for Listed Species Provided? [FLUE 4.16/CE 2.23]: An Environmental Assessment for Listed Species will be required at the time the final Master Plan is submitted for DRC review processing. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 3. Springs Protection Zone/Design: The site is located in Marion County's Rainbow Springs Secondary Springs Protection Zone (SPZ). This zone type will need to be noted on the final Master Plan and subsequent plans, and the project design must comply with the applicable SPZ design standards. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 4. Wellhead Protection (NGAR & LDC Section ]: The proposed potable water well(s) will require identification and delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) on the final Master Plan and appropriate subsequent development plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: WAIVER REQUESTED 5. Access Management - Existing R/W, Functional Roads, Major Roads: The existing R/W widths for the abutting roadway network must be provided with the final Master Plan. The proposed SW 49th Avenue (Functional Collector), SW 85th & 90th Street (Collector/Major Road), and Ocala Crossings Boulevard (Collector/Major Road) appear to provide a sufficient and complete street network coordinated with the surrounding area. A formal waiver will be required at address any other un-met Section/Quarter-Section R/W dedication requirements; however Planning staff would support such a waiver. 2
29 STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION ON FUTURE MASTER PLAN 6. Access Management - Internal/Interconnected Access/Parallel Access: The proposed Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network appear to provide sufficient access alternatives to address Interconnected and Parallel Access; however final review is subject to more detailed information required with the final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans. Direct access to the Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network by individual sites will be prohibited, particularly for individual residential developments; however some facilities may be authorized for access on a case-by-case basis to be further addressed by the final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION ON FUTURE MASTER PLAN 7. Access Management - Multi-modal: The final Master Plan and subsequent phase plans will need to provide for multi-modal access addressing pedestrian/sidewalk and bicycle access, particular given the public facilities and long-term commercial development opportunities in the surroundings. The Master Plan will need to establish location and design standards for the overall "multi-modal access network" which is then reflected by the project's subsequent phase plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 8. Concurrency Utilities: The project must be served by central water and central sewer service. 9. Concurrency Traffic (Access Improvements): Conveyance/establishment of the Functional Collector and Collector/Major Road network roadways shown on the plan will be necessary, along with providing for any additional improvements indicated as necessary to support the development and/or its access needs (e.g., turn lanes at intersections, etc.). STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL ANNOTATE ON MASTER PLAN 10. Concurrency Deferral: The following note must be provided on the final Master Plan unless other suitable and acceptable arrangements are made: "This project has not been granted concurrency approval and/or granted and/or reserved any public facility capacities. Future rights to develop the resulting properties are subject to a deferred concurrency determination and final approval to develop the property has not been obtained. The completion of concurrency review and/or approval has been deferred to later development review stages, such as, but not limited to, Preliminary Plat, Improvement Plan, Final Plat, Site/Drainage Plan review and/or Building Permit review." 10. DEPARTMENT: UTIL - MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REVIEW ITEM: Comments - Response Required. STATUS OF REVIEW: WILL MEET WITH MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REMARKS: Contact Marion County Utilities to discuss developers agreement. 3
30
STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL COMPLY
OCTOBER 8, 2013 PROJECT NAME: UHAUL SELF-STORAGE @ S HWY 441 - MAJOR SITE PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: 1999007762 APPLICATION: #11903 Met with staff 10/24/13, DRC on 11/4/13 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER
More informationMarion County Board of County Commissioners
Marion County Board of County Commissioners Office of the County Engineer 412 SE 25th Ave. Ocala, FL 34471 Phone: 352-671-8686 Fax: 352-671-8687 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE A G E N D A September 16, 2013
More informationMarion County Board of County Commissioners
Marion County Board of County Commissioners Office of the County Engineer 412 SE 25th Ave. Ocala, FL 34471 Phone: 352-671-8686 Fax: 352-671-8687 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE M I N U T E S October 26, 2015
More informationDECEMBER 16, Met with staff 12/22/16, DRC on 1/9/17
DECEMBER 16, 2016 SUBJECT: INITIAL COMMENTS LETTER PROJECT NAME: PHOENIX WOOD PRODUCTS EXPANSION PROJECT #1999007958 APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN #19606 Met with staff 12/22/16, DRC on 1/9/17 1. DEPARTMENT:
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017
& PUD-0000102-2017 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Name: City/ETA Location: City ETA (Application fee & number of copies needed are based on location) Property Location (Legal Description
More informationPRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS
This checklist must accompany your submittal as the cover page. CONDITIONAL USE Application Submittal Checklist for PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL Per Winter Park Land Development Code Sec. 58-90 PRELIMINARY
More informationMAJOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION COVER SHEET
MAJOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION COVER SHEET TOWN OF CLAYTON Planning Department 111 E. Second St., P.O. Box 879 Clayton, NC 27528 Phone: 919-553-5002 Fax: 919-553-1720 Name of Project: Date: Applicant Name:
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST
City of Seminole 9199 113 th Street N. Seminole, FL 33772 Ph: (727) 392-1966 Fx: (727) 319-6583 SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST Note: This checklist is designed to aid designers in the review
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Robert Myers Robert Myers 2955 and 2989 Dauphin Street (Southeast corner of Dauphin Street and Sage Avenue) CITY
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION OSR Subdivision OSR Subdivision 5559 Old Shell Road (South side of Old Shell Road, 570
More informationNOVEMBER 14, 2016 BURRELL ENGINEERING TROY BURRELL N FLORIDA AVE DUNNELLON, FL 34434
NOVEMBER, 0 BURRELL ENGINEERING TROY BURRELL 005 N FLORIDA AVE DUNNELLON, FL 33 PROJECT NAME: SECO @ SR 00 PROJECT #9990079 APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN #9388 Dear Troy: The above referenced project was
More informationSanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES
Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES The following 2019 information is based on the information available to staff at the time of creation. Dates & time may change
More informationCITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL
CPC AGENDA June 8, 2006 Page 37 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD 05-294 - QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: PARKWOOD AT WOLF RANCH NASS DESIGN ASSOCIATES
More informationMitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction
Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative Introduction Mitchell Ranch South is a proposed single family (detached) residential development on
More informationPARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Joint Planning and Zoning Meeting
1. Call To Order 2. Roll Call of Members 3. Chairman's Comments PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Joint Planning and Zoning Meeting January 11, 2017 6:00 PM Courthouse
More informationAsbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan
Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: NVR Inc. Project Size: +/- 76.13 acres Parcel Numbers: 02101112,02116101,02116112, 02116113 Current Zoning: Transitional Residential
More informationCITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SPECIAL LAND USE Date City Official App. Filing Fee Rec'd ($350) NOTE TO APPLICANT: Please submit this application for Site Plan Review along with twenty (20) copies
More informationHuntington Stormwater Utility
Huntington Stormwater Utility Stormwater Management & Sediment and Erosion Control Requirements for Construction Sites Authorized by Huntington City Code Articles: 971, 970, 930, 935, 955, Revised April
More informationApplication for Site Plan Review
Application for Site Plan Review City of Pontiac Office of Land Use and Strategic Planning 47450 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342 T: 248.758.2800 F: 248.758.2827 Property/Project Address: Sidwell Number:
More informationMajor Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist
This checklist provides specific requirements that are apart of the Sketch process. The entire process is described by the Huntersville Subdivision Review Process which details all the submittal and resubmittal
More informationSite Development Plan (SDP) Checklist
Development Services Department 100 N. Wilcox Street, Castle Rock CO 80104 303-660-1393 or CRGov.com Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist A complete Site Development Plan (SDP) submittal will contain
More informationCity of Mt. Juliet Planning & Zoning Department. Site Plan Checklist. Site plan cklist v1.18
City of Mt. Juliet Planning & Zoning Department Site Plan Checklist Site Plan approval is required for all specified community facilities, all commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential activities
More informationAt Your Disposal CUP Amendment, Lot 20, Village Service Commercial, at 128 Bastille Dr. (PLN17-208)
MEMORANDUM Archuleta County Development Services Planning Department 1122 HWY 84 P. O. Box 1507 Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147 970-264-1390 Fax 970-264-3338 TO: Archuleta County Planning Commission FROM:
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
WHEN PROCESS TYPE III IS USED References to Process Type III applications are found in several places in the Milton Municipal Code (MMC), indicating that the development, activity, or use, is permitted
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationPART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.
PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: JBH Development, LLC and Hopper Communities, INC Project Size: +/- 80.48 acres Parcel Number: 01513107, 01513108, 01513109, 01513113, 01513120, 01513121, 01513122, 01513124,
More informationSITE PLAN (REVISED 8/13/18) l. Development Data Table
SITE PLAN (REVISED 8/13/18) l. Development Data Table a. Site Acreage: 9.25 b. Tax Parcels included in rezoning: #108-081-07 and #108-081-23 c. Existing Zoning (including overlays and vesting): R-3 (see
More informationREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL
DATE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL Community Development Territorial Greens PUD Concept Plan Development Stage Plan Subdivision (Preliminary
More informationTHE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA
THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA LETTER OF DECISION Ark of Safety, Inc. Mobile, AL 36617 Re: (Northwest corner of Main Street and First Avenue, extending to the Southwest corner of Esau Avenue and Main Street.)
More informationGadsden County Planning Commission Agenda Request
Date of Meeting: November 16, 2017 To: From: Through: Subject: Gadsden County Planning Commission Agenda Request Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Board Jill A. Jeglie, AICP, Senior Planner Clyde
More informationCITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda
Item: CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda Agenda Date Requested: February 7, 2012 Contact Person: Gerald R. Ferguson - Director of Planning & Development Services Description: 3901
More informationMANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS May 2007 SECTION 1 Responsibility of Applicant TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Stormwater Management Plan Required Information
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George s
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016
# 9 ZON2016-01032 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME JJT Properties LLC LOCATION 1147 & 1151 East I-65 Service Road South and 1180 Sledge Drive (Southeast corner
More informationDrexel, Barrell & Co.
Drexel, Barrell & Co. June 18, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning
More informationTOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Applications: 5 copies of application - Applicant will reproduce the copies at his/her costs. The Township Clerk
More informationProject phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan
SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: (616) 847-3490 Fax: (616) 844-2051 Website: www.grandhaven.org 1. Project Information Address/location
More informationCITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda
Item: CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda Agenda Date Requested: April 2, 2013 Contact Person: Gerald R. Ferguson, Director of Planning & Development Services Description: 3317,
More informationDESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE
RFQ: 17-C-00003 DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE PREPARED BY: JAMES E. JACKSON, JR. AIA CITY ARCHITECT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT and INTERFLOW ENGINEERING, L.L.C DESIGN CRITERIA
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)
Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
More informationMetropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax
Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM TO:
More informationWatertown City Council
City of Watertown Watertown City Council April 14 th, 2015 Agenda Item: City Comment on Sun Share CUP Application Request for Action: Motion to Approve City Comments regarding CUP Application Department:
More informationSTREAM BUFFERS
88-415 STREAM BUFFERS 88-415-01 PURPOSE In the Kansas City region and throughout the nation, vegetated stream buffers have been clearly shown to protect stream stability and related infrastructure, improve
More informationDrexel, Barrell & Co.
Drexel, Barrell & Co. December 21, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning
More informationCRESCENT RESOURCES INC.
CRESCENT RESOURCES INC. Due Diligence Checklist Project Name: Client: Project No. Date: 1 Survey Review survey for compliance with Crescent Resources, Inc. s Instructions to Surveyors (see below): All
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2018-018 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-5 HD-O (single family residential, historic district overlay) and B-2(CD) HD-O
More informationLONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST
LONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST Planning Department Date Stamp Design Review Formal Application Change of Use (No Site Improvements)* All information provided and submitted
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA DESIGN REVIEW REPORT : SUMMAR NO.: 4469 (S) Paul Johnston AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Cynthia Lee-Sheng ADVERTISING DATES: PAB PUBLIC HEARING: HEARING:
More informationARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
More informationLandscape and fencing requirements of this Chapter shall apply to all new landscaped areas.
Chapter 19.06. Landscaping and Fencing. Sections: 19.06.01. Purpose. 19.06.02. Required Landscaping Improvements. 19.06.03. General Provisions. 19.06.04. Landscaping Plan. 19.06.05. Completion of Landscape
More informationREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM
DATE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL Community Development PUD Concept & Development Stage Plan Preliminary Plat & Final Plat PREVIOUS
More informationCHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08)
CHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08) 26.01 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. Landscaping is an important element of the use, development and preservation of land, and a significant factor
More informationBUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING. Sec Purpose and Intent.
ARTICLE 20 BUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING Sec. 20.1. Purpose and Intent. Trees improve air and water quality, reduce soil erosion, reduce noise and glare, provide habitat for desirable wildlife,
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN PLANNING COMMISSION November 12, 2014 MINUTES
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN PLANNING COMMISSION November 12, 2014 MINUTES Chairperson Thompson called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Johnson, Boynton, Kelley, McKenna, Budd, Franzoi
More informationRezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: , ,
From: Kelsie Anderson, PE Kelsie.Anderson@charlottenc.gov 704-432-5492 Staff Reviewer: Rick Grochoske, PE rgrochoske@charlottenc.gov 704-432-1556 CDOT s review of this rezoning petition is intended to
More informationPRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016
PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016 The following items are required for the preliminary plat. Numbers correspond with those on the example preliminary plat. RENO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS
More informationMOBILE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER OF DECISION. October 22, 2010
MOBILE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER OF DECISION Archbishop of Mobile 400 Government St. Mobile, AL 36602 Re: Case #SUB2010-00075 (Subdivision) 3650 Springhill Avenue (Northwest corner of Springhill
More informationSUBDIVISION, REZONING, PLANNING APPROVAL, PUD & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: May 3, 2007
SUBDIVISION, REZONING, PLANNING APPROVAL, PUD & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: May 3, 2007 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION TOG Properties, LLC Highland Professional Park, Resubdivision of
More informationChecklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:
Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number: Email: Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Concept Plan Requirements: I. General Project Information 1. Address or parcel number
More information5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Low Impact Development (LID) requires a shift in stormwater management away from conveying runoff to a small number of downstream points through hydraulically
More informationARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW
ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW 17.01 INTENT AND PURPOSE The intent of this section is to provide for consultation and cooperation between the applicant and the township planning commission so that the applicant
More informationBaumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria
Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission s recommendation
More informationNOTES: 1.) THE BOGGY CREEK RD. AND SIMPSON RD. IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON RECORD CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. 2.) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STRUCTURES AND ANCILLARY
More informationCHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 870 SOUTH MAIN ST. PO BOX 70 CHEBOYGAN, MI 49721 PHONE: (231)627-8489 FAX: (231)627-3646 CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER
More informationNet Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= sq. ft. a) Credited Street Area (total adjacent frontage) x ½ width of public rightof-way
PROJECT FACT SHEET Section A: Project Information Application type: Date: Project Name: Use Type: (check/list all that apply) Office/Institutional Residential Mixed-Use Other: Overlay District: (check
More informationChesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)
1) Application form and filing fee. Application Form.pdf Development Review Guide STEP 6 of 8 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 2) Transportation Development Review
More informationGENERAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS. The following landscape provisions shall be adhered to by all land uses unless otherwise noted:
CHAPTER 1.18 Sections: 1.18.005 Purpose. 1.18.010 Landscaping, Buffering, and Fencing Improvements Required. 1.18.015 General Landscape Provisions. 1.18.020 Landscaping Plan. 1.18.025 Single-Family Dwellings
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2018-028 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MX-1 LLWPA (mixed use district, Lower Lake Wylie Protected Area), R-3 LLWPA (single family residential, Lower
More informationZoning:CS FLU: LI/CS 4, SF 10' HT 21,120 SF 24.5' HT Proposed Usable Open Space (120 SF) 4,774 SF 10' HT 4, SF 15.5' HT 4, SF 15.5'
Zoning:CS FLU: LI/CS 4,709.21 SF 21,120 SF 24.5' HT Proposed Usable Open Space (120 SF) 4,774 SF 4,014.01 SF 15.5' HT 4,655.61 SF 15.5' HT Proposed Bike Rack RAMP Proposed 3" Concrete Ballard BUILDING
More informationMajor Development Order Approval Process. Introduction. In This Handout. Pre-Application Meeting. Meetings
Approval Process Introduction 1CITY OF MARIANNA MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 936 Marianna, FL 32447 (850) 482-2786 Fax (850) 482-3627 The City of Marianna requires developers obtain
More informationZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION
ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd phone (919) 968-2728 fax (919) 969-2014 www.townofchapelhill.org Parcel Identifier Number (PIN): Date: Section A: Project Information
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE Codes analyses for each subcommittee were completed to assist participants of the Richland County Site Planning Roundtable.
More informationGloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST
Page 1 of 9 Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS Please fill in all blanks and please reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may be found,
More informationCity of Sun Prairie Wetland Buffer Reduction Request
City of Sun Prairie Wetland Buffer Reduction Request Westside Development Area January 9, 2017 Prepared by: City of Sun Prairie 300 E. Main Street Sun Prairie, WI 53590 BACKGROUND The City of Sun Prairie
More informationPASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM. REFERENCES: Land Development Code, Zoning/Code Compliance. Section 306, Development Administrator
PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Development Review Committee DATE: 3/25/10 FILE: ZN10-162 SUBJECT: Class II, Commercial Development Review - Village Market at Wesley Chapel Variance Requests
More informationLONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST
LONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST Planning Department Date Stamp Design Review Formal Application All information provided and submitted with this Application Checklist shall
More informationCamden County Development Regulations. Updated February 2017
Camden County Development Regulations Updated February 2017 GENERAL MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD All meetings will convene at 6:00 PM on the 4th Tuesday of each month and will be
More informationArticle 10: Landscaping and Buffering
10.01: Purpose Article 10: Landscaping 10.01: Purpose The purpose of this article is to: A) Promote and protect the interest of the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare in accordance
More informationAPPLICATION FOR MINOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
www.appleton.org APPLICATION FOR MINOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Community and Economic Development Department 100 N. Appleton St. PH: 920-832-6468 Appleton, WI 54911 FAX: 920-832-5994 Stamp date received PROPERTY
More informationRezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2018-028 Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MX-1 LLWPA (mixed use district, Lower Lake Wylie Protected Area), R-3 LLWPA (single family residential, Lower Lake
More informationApplication Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)
STAFF REPORT Town of Clayton Planning Department 111 E. Second Street, Clayton, NC 27520 P.O. Box 879, Clayton, NC 27528 Phone: 919-553-5002 Fax: 919-553-1720 Planning Board May 22, 2017 Application Number:
More informationVilla Vizcaya PUD Amendment No. 3 4 April 16, 2008 May 29, 2015 Presented to: City of Port St. Lucie Planning and Zoning Department 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984 Exhibit
More informationCOLERAIN TOWNSHIP ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 18, :00 p.m.
COLERAIN TOWNSHIP ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 18, 2016-6:00 p.m. Colerain Township Government Complex 4200 Springdale Road - Cincinnati, OH 45251 1. Meeting called to order. Pledge
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SECTION / CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SECTION / CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Project Number City Development Number Application Date (Assigned
More informationPreliminary Subdivision Plan/ Site Development Order/Final Engineering Application
Development Review Division Development Services Department CITY OF OVIEDO 400 Alexandria Boulevard Oviedo, Florida 32765 Application No. Date Received Phone: (407) 971-5775 Fax: (407) 971-5819 www.cityofoviedo.net
More informationSUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, REZONING & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013
SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, REZONING & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION S. E. Cemeteries of AL
More informationImprove the appearance of off-street parking areas, vehicular use areas, and property abutting public and private roads;
Bedford Township, MI (Monroe Co.) 2012 http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientid=02123 400.1907 - Landscaping and screening. Se 1907. 1. Intent. Landscaping, greenbelts, and screening are necessary
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
BOWNE TOWNSHIP PO Box 35, 8240 Alden Nash Road, Alto, Michigan 49302 Ph. 616-868-6846 Fax 616-868-0110 http://www.bownetwp.org SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS 1. Application Form and Fee Schedule Site Plan Review
More informationGlenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan
Implementation 114 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 OVERVIEW This chapter summarizes the administrative procedures necessary to implement the proposed land use plan, infrastructure improvements, development standards,
More informationRezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:
From: Kelsie Anderson, PE Kelsie.Anderson@charlottenc.gov 704-432-5492 Staff Reviewer: Kory Hedrick, PE, PMP Khedrick@charlottenc.gov 704-432-6511 CDOT s review of this rezoning petition is intended to
More informationHILLSIDE BUILDING COMMITTEE PLAN REVIEW DIRECTIONS
HILLSIDE BUILDING COMMITTEE PLAN REVIEW DIRECTIONS 1 1. Review Hillside Regulations to ensure your design is in conformance with current Town Code. 2. Complete page 3 and contact Paul Mood at 480-348-3573,
More informationNet Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= 1,076,181 sq. ft.
PROJECT FACT SHEET Section A: Project Information Application type: Project Name: Special Use Permit Date: June 29, 215 Merin Road Community Use Type: (check/list all that apply) Office/Institutional x
More informationKASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016
KASPER City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 Applicant: Sentinel Land Company, LLC 4910 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA Prepared by: SEC Planning
More informationCity of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations
1.0 Applicability: City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations These regulations apply to all development within the limits of the City of Waco as well as to any subdivisions within the extra territorial
More informationVILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT. Single Family Residential, Townhomes
VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT PETITION INFORMATION Docket # C-212 Staff Megan Ledbetter Petitioner(s) Peacehaven Development LLC Owner(s) Larry Jarvis, William Alexander and Peacehaven
More informationAppendix I. Checklists
Appendix I Checklists Town of Greenwich Drainage Manual Department of Public Works - Engineering Division Town Hall - 101 Field Point Road, Greenwich, CT 06836-2540 Phone 203-622-7767 - Fax 203-622-7747
More informationSPECIFIC PLAN Requirements
CITY OF LANCASTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, California 93534 (661) 723-6100 SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements Purpose The purpose of a specific plan is to provide for the logical development
More information