Future Development Plan

Transcription

1 Future Development Plan Introduction The Future Development Plan is an integral part of Overland Park's Comprehensive Plan. The plan map is the graphic representation of the City's land use goals and policies as developed and identified in the "Goals for Overland Park" text of the plan. Furthermore, the map helps local decision makers (whether they are office developers or citizens searching for a home) determine how the community envisions future development. The Assumptions of the Plan The expected spatial arrangement of new development is displayed on the Future Development Plan map. These land use patterns are based upon the assumption that future development trends will be similar to those observed in the past and will be in agreement with the goals of the community. In addition, the Future Development Plan map was developed by considering the following factors: 1. The compatibility of land uses, based on a review of the following specific conditions: a. Environmental and natural features of the land; b. Expected service, facility, and utility capacities; c. Relationships between land uses; d. Transportation system networks; e. Population and service level projections. 5

2 2. The needs of Overland Park residents and governing officials. 3. The City's adopted land use goal statements. 4. A review of the City's current policies and ordinances. The Future Development Plan is divided into several broad categories: Residential; Rural Policy Area; Commercial; Mixed-Use; 151 st Street Corridor Design Concept Plan Area; Office; Hotels and Motels; Light Industrial/Business Park; Industrial; Public and Semipublic; Parks, Recreation and Open Space; and Street Network. On the following pages, each of these categories is described. The Future Development Plan map also includes the following categories which are exclusive to the Blue Valley Plan- Urban Fringe Area: Transition Area; Research and Development; and Growth Policy Area: Agricultural/Residential. Each of these categories is described in more detail in the Specific Plans Section. Future Development Plan Categories Residential There are six residential land use categories depicted on the Future Development Plan. The categories are distinguishable by the density of development allowed in each as follows: Very-Low-Density Low-Density: Planned Residential Neighborhood 1 acre or more per unit depending on the zoning Greater than 1 and less than or equal to 5 units per acre Three density ranges: Low up to 7 units per acre Medium Greater than 7 and less than or equal to 14 units per acre High Greater than 14 units per acre 6

3 Medium-Density: Medium-High-Density High-Density Greater than 5 and less than or equal to 12.5 units per acre Greater than 12.5 and less than or equal to 16.5 units per acre Greater than 16.5 and less than or equal to 43 units per acre The Planned Residential Neighborhood category gives notice to anyone referring to the Future Development Plan that there is or will be a specific development plan for the property that includes a mixture of housing types with density averaging over the entire project. Rural Policy Area Rural Policy Area is a category in the area south of the City's incorporated limits and in a small area of the City adjacent to the Blue River near 167th Street. Rural Policy Area applies to an area where the majority of the properties are large agricultural tracts interspersed with scattered residential development of 1 to 10 acres in size. More intense development of the area would not be appropriate at this time. Growth Policy Area Growth Policy Area is a category in the Blue Valley Plan - Urban Fringe Area south of the City's incorporated limits. One dwelling unit per 10 acres is the standard density in the Growth Policy Area though planned residential developments with two-acre, three-acre or larger residential lots may be an appropriate option. Transition Area Transition Area is a category in the Blue Valley Plan - Urban Fringe Area south of the City's incorporated limits. A Transition Area is an area where the pressures for development and the factors that would affect the nature of 7

4 development are evolving. A key factor that will affect the nature of future development in this area is the availability of sanitary sewers, therefore committing to specific residential land uses for this area is not appropriate at this time. Commercial The locational criteria for commercial development, as discussed in the Commercial land use goals, are used as the basis for locating future commercial areas on the Future Development Plan. The Commercial land use goals are also used to evaluate the appropriateness of all rezoning and final development plan proposals for retail commercial development. The Future Development Plan further identifies areas zoned for commercial uses but not yet developed or planned for commercial uses but not yet zoned as Neighborhood (N), Community (C), or Regional (R). Table 2 identifies the various zoning districts considered appropriate in the Commercial land use category. Mixed-Use The Mixed-Use category is intended to provide for a variety of land uses in closer proximity to one another than is possible in traditional Comprehensive Plan categories such as Commercial, Office, and residential categories. Developments are expected to have a mixture of residential, office, and retail uses. The Mixed-Use land use goals are used to evaluate the appropriateness of all rezoning and final development plan proposals for mixed-use developments. Office The locational criteria for office development, as discussed in the Office land use goals, are used as the basis for locating future office areas on the Future Development Plan. The Office land use goals are also used to evaluate the appropriateness of all rezoning and final development plan proposals for office development in the City. Though office land uses are considered appropriate in the Commercial land use category as shown on Table 2, only office uses are appropriate in the Office land use category, unless part of a mixed-use development. 8

5 Hotels and Motels The locational criteria for Hotel and Motel development, as discussed in the Hotel and Motel land use goals, are used when evaluating a special use permit for hotel or motel development. Hotels and motels are considered appropriate in the Commercial, Office, and Mixed-Use land use categories or in areas where Business Parks (defined below) would be acceptable. Commercial, office, mixed-use, or business park land uses, however, would not necessarily be appropriate where a hotel or motel development might be considered acceptable. Light Industrial/Business Park The locational criteria for light industrial or business park development as discussed in the Light Industrial/Business Park land use goals are used as the basis for locating future light industrial/business park areas on the Future Development Plan. The Light Industrial/Business Park land use goals are also used to evaluate the appropriateness of all rezoning and final development plan proposals for light industrial or business park development in the City. The BP - Business Park district is distinguishable from industrial zoning in that the Business Park district is intended to allow a mix of office; light industrial; and limited retail and service uses in a planned Business Park setting of 15 acres or more. Low-density, high-quality development with increased amenities and open space is desired. Future development of light industrial/business park land should reflect both proper layout and high-quality design to maintain the City's highquality developments and to avoid the negative impacts often associated with industrial development. Future light industrial areas should be developed as business parks rather than as isolated sites dispersed among other land uses. Street improvements adjacent to an industrial/business park site are also important to a development's success and should be given proper attention. Industrial The need for Industrial land uses as opposed to Light Industrial/Business Park land uses is limited in Overland Park. Industrial land uses should be located near freeways with adequate access provided by thoroughfares. The less intensive Light Industrial/Business Park uses are considered appropriate in the Industrial land use category. The more intensive Industrial land uses as represented by M-2, MP-2, or any of the Commercial zoning districts, however, would not be appropriate where a Business Park or other Light Industrial use would be considered acceptable. 9

6 Public and Semipublic The need for public and semipublic land uses (such as schools, cemeteries, libraries, fire stations, post offices, and religious institutions) is difficult to project. One difficulty is that such facilities are controlled by jurisdictions over which the City has limited control. Each year, however, several jurisdictions are contacted to obtain their plans for expansion or contraction of facilities and services. Also, these jurisdictions are encouraged to work with the City in identifying possible sites for their facilities. The nature of public and semipublic uses and the fact that they are allowed in residentially zoned districts make the selection of all appropriate sites impossible. The City, therefore, considers areas shown for the various residential categories as appropriate for church and school sites provided the sites have adequate access to a collector or thoroughfare street. Once known, churches, schools, and other public facilities are shown as Potential Public and Semipublic Use on the Future Development Plan and the boundaries of the property are delineated. Where an asterisk alone is used on one of the Comprehensive Plan maps to depict a potential public or semipublic use, the location is meant to be general and not intended to be exact. When a church, school, or other public facility is built or under construction, the site is then shown as Public and Semipublic on the Future Development Plan. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space The types of land uses allowed in this category are both public and private in ownership and include: Parks Recreational Areas and Facilities Conservation Areas Stream Corridors Reserves and Urban Forests Low-Intensity Agricultural Production Greenway Linkages Where an asterisk is used on one of the Comprehensive Plan maps to depict a potential park or open space site, the location is meant to be general and not intended to be exact. The provision of park or open space in an area, an exact location, and whether ownership will be either public or private are all negotiated at the time a development plan is proposed/approved. Conservation areas include land set aside for floodplain management, 10

7 erosion control, and water resources. A stream corridor is a natural stream and adjacent riparian corridor that is set aside with use limitations for preservation of wildlife habitat, water quality, storage of floodwaters, and protection of private property from stream migration and bank instability. Reserves are areas set aside for conserving a particular site feature of ecological, aesthetic or historical value. Urban forest areas are parcels of land that are used for noise control and visual buffer zones, typically along highway rights-of-way. Land in these classes could be dedicated in perpetuity to the City but not necessarily for use as parkland. Low-intensity agricultural production includes sod farms, tree farms, and nursery stock. The location of future park sites is based upon the following criteria: 1. Maximum use by surrounding residents. 2. Continued development of the neighborhood park concept. 3. Where possible, park sites will be located adjacent to proposed school sites to ensure maximum usage and to avoid duplication of services. 4. For optimum management and conservation of natural waterway, floodplains, and open space areas of unique environmental or historic value. Proposed Elderly Development Proposed Elderly Development is a land use subcategory, under Medium- Density Residential, Medium-High-Density Residential and High-Density Residential. There can be a significant difference between retirement housing and other medium- or higher-density residential housing. On average, retirement housing has fewer occupants per unit and generates less traffic than housing built for the general marketplace. There is also less likelihood of outdoor recreation facilities. Thus, a location that is deemed appropriate for retirement housing will not necessarily also be appropriate for other types of higher-density housing such as garden apartments or townhomes. It is for this reason that an asterisk is used to denote Proposed Elderly Development. This subcategory, as an overlay to the existing Future Development Plan designation, gives notice to anyone referring to the Future Development Plan that a specific development proposal for an elderly development at a specific location is available for reference. Once an elderly development is under construction or has been built, the Future Development Plan will show the entire site as Elderly Development in the residential category color that reflects its density. 11

8 Street Network The street network system is shown on the Street Network map. The map bases projected collector, super-collector, and thoroughfare systems for the southern, undeveloped portion of the City on information from the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element. Spacing of thoroughfares at one-mile intervals with collectors located at each half-mile junction is in accordance with City policy. Interruptions occur, however, where freeways or major public uses appear. Proposed thoroughfares and collectors are also shown in the Blue Valley Plan - Urban Fringe area. Greenway Linkages Plans The greenway linkages concept as shown on the Greenway Linkages Plans for Southern and Northern Overland Park proposes the creation of a series of linear greenways linked to one another, to residential and employment areas, and to public parkland and facilities throughout Overland Park. The proposed greenway linkages will provide: 1. Recreational choices 2. Landscaped open space (extensively landscaped easements, most of which have bike/hike trail access); 3. Preservation of natural and historic areas; 4. Screening of differing land uses from one another, and from U. S. 69 Highway and other major roadways; and 5. Ties to open space recreational areas outside of the corporate boundaries of Overland Park in adjacent communities and the unincorporated areas of Johnson County. A key benefit of the greenway linkages along U. S. 69 Highway will be their dual role as a landscaped parkway into the City and as a screen for residential areas from the roadway, mitigating the excessive noise and domineering visual traits often associated with such a major highway. 12

9 Unlike the Greenway Linkages Plan for Southern Overland Park, the Greenway Linkages Plan for Northern Overland Park proposes key on-street bike routes, with parallel sidewalks for pedestrian access, as well as off-street linkages. These bike routes and linear greenways link to one another, to residential and employment areas, and to public parkland and facilities throughout northern Overland Park. The proposed plan will provide: 1. Off-street, multiuse trails 2. Key on-street bike routes Four characteristics of the greenway linkages concept must be kept in mind when reviewing either Greenway Linkages Plans. These characteristics are: 1. The plans are long range and may take twenty years or more to develop. 2. The plans are conceptual, showing the general routes and desired ties to other public facilities and parklands. 3. Individual linkages as shown on the plans will be developed according to the Greenway Linkages Guidelines, and will be closely coordinated with the site planning of the adjacent private developments. 4. The construction of individual linkages will be tied closely to the development cycles of the community. When significant land development is occurring, land easements will be dedicated, revenues will be generated, and the need to serve new residents or workers will be such to justify further greenway linkage development. Comparing the Plan Map With the Zoning Map As a general guide to future development in the City, the plan map should not be considered a pre-zoning document. Some of the differences between the Future Development Plan and the Zoning Map are listed in Table 1. 13

10 Table 1 Differences Between the Future Development Plan and the Zoning Map Future Development Plan (1) The Plan reflects, in general terms, the relationships that ensure compatible land uses and the overall soundness of the Plan. (2) The Plan projects land needs into the future, thus serving as a policy guide for future development. (3) The Plan enables government officials to anticipate future public expenditures more effectively. This results in more efficient use of tax dollars. (4) The Plan provides an opportunity for citizens, private developers, and affected governmental jurisdictions to determine the City's goals. Zoning Map (1) The Map is specific in nature. It identifies the zoning classification for each land parcel in the City. (2) The Map is updated as soon as a zoning application is approved and reflects current opportunities for development. (3) The Unified Development Ordinance establishes maximum densities, parking requirements, height limitations, and other required improvements for each zoning district. (4) The Map identifies only the current zoning of land parcels. 14

11 Table 1 continued Differences Between the Future Development Plan and the Zoning Map Future Development Plan (5) The Plan allows the use of innovative planning techniques far ahead of development, thereby preserving a highquality urban area. (6) The Plan provides information that is needed to make day-today decisions about future development patterns for the City. (7) The Plan provides a future land use guide that allows alternative land development proposals to be reviewed for their merits and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Zoning Map (5) The Map is an official document that is legally binding and reflects the current development potential of land parcels. (6) The Map permits development to occur in accordance with present opportunities and constraints. (7) A Map change can be initiated by a property owner, their agent or the City. The Future Development Plan and the Zoning Map, along with their respective texts, have different yet complementary roles in guiding and regulating land development in Overland Park. They should be used jointly to review the merits of a proposed development to ensure that it meets the legal regulations pertaining to land use and complies with the City's goals and policies. 15

12 Comparing the Plan Categories With Zoning Categories The listing in Table 2 compares the land use categories of the Future Development Plan with the corresponding zoning districts of the Unified Development Ordinance and Map. The comparison is meant to be a guide, not an exact breakdown, to what is and is not permitted in each category or district. It should be noted, however, that a special use permit may be approved in any district, and may, therefore, appear in any land use category. Proposals for special use permits are evaluated on their individual merit. In addition, the Future Development Plan's residential categories should be viewed as representing a density range, not a maximum allowable density. The exact density appropriate for each land tract will be determined at the time of rezoning. A proposed rezoning whose project density exceeds the midpoint in the range of a residential category will be acceptable only when exceptional design and locational criteria warrant such consideration. Table 2 Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 1. Very-Low-Density Residential (Less than or equal to 1 unit per acre)* 1. A RE RP-OE Zoning Map Zoning Districts Agricultural Residential Estates Planned Open Space Estate Residential 16

13 Table 2 continued Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 2. Low-Density Residential (Greater than 1 and less than or equal to 5 units per acre)* 2. RP-OS R-1 RP-1 R-1A RP-1A RP-1N R-2 RP-2 RP-4 PRN Zoning Map Zoning Districts Planned Open Space Single- Family Residential Single-Family Residential Planned Single- Family Residential Small-Lot Single- Family Residential Planned Small-Lot Single-Family Residential Planned Single-Family Infill Residential Two-Family Residential Planned Two-Family Residential Planned Cluster Housing Planned Residential Neighborhood District 17

14 Table 2 continued Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 3. Planned Residential Neighborhood (Low density less than or equal to 7 units per acre Medium density greater than 7 and less than or equal to 14 units per acre High density greater than 14 units per acre)* Zoning Map Zoning Districts 3. PRN Planned Residential Neighborhood District 4. Medium-Density Residential (Greater than five and less than or equal to 12.5 units per acre)* 5. Medium-High Density Residential (Greater than 12.5 and less than or equal to 16.5 units per acre)* 4. RP-1N R-2 RP-2 R-3 RP-3 RP-4 PRN 5. RP-5 PRN Planned Single-Family Infill Residential Two-Family Residential Planned Two- Family Residential Garden Apartment Planned Garden Apartment Planned Cluster Housing Planned Residential Neighborhood District Planned Apartment House Planned Residential Neighborhood District 18

15 Table 2 continued Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 6. High-Density Residential (Greater than 16.5 and less than or equal to 43 units per acre)* 6. RP-6 PRN Zoning Map Zoning Districts Planned High-Rise Apartment Planned Residential Neighborhood District 7. Commercial 7. C-O Office Building CP-O Planned Office Building C-1 Restricted Business CP-1 Planned Restricted Business C-2 General Business CP-2 Planned General Business C-3 Commercial CP-3 Planned Commercial MXD Planned Mixed Use District 8. Mixed-Use 8. MXD Planned Mixed Use st Street Corridor Design 9. C-O Office Building Concept Plan Area CP-O Planned Office Building (Will also include a new C-1 Restricted Business mixed-use district that introduces a residential CP-1 Planned Restricted Business component to the area) MXD Planned Mixed Use 19

16 Table 2 continued Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Zoning Map Zoning Districts 10. Office 10. C-O Office Building CP-O Planned Office Building MXD Planned Mixed Use 11. Light Industrial/Business Park 11. BP M-1 MP-1 Business Park Industrial Park Planned Industrial Park 12. Industrial 12. BP Business Park M-1 Industrial Park MP-1 Planned Industrial Park M-2 General Industrial MP-2 Planned General Industrial 13. Public and Semipublic 13. R-1 RP-6 All Residential Districts 14. Parks, Recreation and Open Space 14. R-1 Single-Family Residential RP-1 Planned Single-Family Residential 15. Rural Policy Area 15. A Agricultural RE Residential Estates 16. Hotels and Motels 16. SUP Special Use Permit 20

17 Table 2 continued Comparison Between Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and the Corresponding Districts of the Zoning Map Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 17. May Occur in Any Category (Depending on use requested) 18. Downtown Form-Based Code Zoning Map Zoning Districts 17. SUP Special Use Permit in All Categories 18. DFD Downtown Form District 19. Proposed Mixed-Use 19. MXD Planned Mixed Use 20. Research and Development** 20. Refer to Johnson County s Zoning and Subdivision Regulations 21. Transition Area** 21. Refer to Johnson County s Zoning and Subdivision Regulations 22. Growth Policy Area: Agricultural/Residential** 22. Refer to Johnson County s Zoning and Subdivision Regulations * Residential density is calculated using either gross or net land acreage, depending upon which is specified in the approved zoning district. ** These categories are currently found only in the unincorporated portion of Johnson County identified on the map as the Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area. 21

18 Comparing the Plan Map Categories With Existing Land Uses The Future Development Plan map categories cover a wide range of residential and nonresidential land uses. The comparison found in Table 3 provides examples of the types of land uses that are typical for each category of the Future Development Plan map. No listing can be all-inclusive, as exceptions do exist. The comparison should, however, be useful in identifying the usual category a particular land use would fall under. Table 3 Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 1. Rural Policy Area One dwelling unit per ten acres. More intense development is not appropriate at this time. 2. Growth Policy Area** - One dwelling unit per ten acres or two- threeor larger-acre lots in planned residential developments 3. Transition Area** - no specific residential density at this time Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 1. Agriculture Single-Family Homes 2. Agriculture Single-Family Homes 3. Agriculture Single-Family Homes 22

19 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 4. Very-Low-Density Residential Less than or equal to one unit per acre 4. Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses Single-Family Homes (Large-lot and Planned Open Space Residential subdivisions) 5. Low-Density Residential 5. Greater than one and less than or equal to five units per acre Single-Family Homes (Most subdivisions fall under this category) Patio Homes Duplex Homes (Most duplexes would be in the Medium-Density Residential Category unless part of a PRN District) Attached Housing (duplex, tri-plex, townhomes, garden apartments, etc. when part of a PRN District) 23

20 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories 6. Planned Residential Neighborhood - (Low density less than or equal to 7 units per acre Medium density greater than 7 and less than or equal to 14 units per acre High density greater than 14 units per acre) Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 6. Single-Family Homes Patio Homes Attached Housing (duplex, tri-plex, etc) Townhomes Garden Apartments Nursing Care Facilities* 7. Medium-Density Residential Greater than five and less than or equal to 12.5 units per acre 7. Attached Housing (duplex, triplex, etc.) Townhomes Garden Apartments Nursing Care Facilities* 8. Medium-High-Density Residential Greater than 12.5 and less than or equal to 16.5 units per acre 8. Garden Apartments Nursing Care Facilities* 9. High-Density Residential Greater than 16.5 and less than or equal to 43 units per acre 9. Garden Apartments Mid- and High-Rise Apartments Nursing Care Facilities* 24

21 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 10. Commercial Retail Shops and Shopping The Future Development Centers (neighborhood, Plan identifies areas community and regional) zoned for commercial New and Used Car Dealers but not yet developed or Gas Stations and Car planned for commercial Service and Repair Shops uses but not yet zoned as Restaurants and Bars Neighborhood (N), Entertainment Centers Community (C), or (movie theaters, etc.) Regional (R).*** Health and Fitness Centers Private Technical and Business Schools Loft Apartments 11. Mixed-Use/Proposed Mixed-Use st Street Corridor Design Concept Plan Area 11. Retail General offices Loft Apartments 12. General offices Retail (limited to CP-1 uses) Financial Institutions Day Care Centers Loft Apartments 25

22 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 13. Office 13. General Offices Private Technical and Business Schools Day Care Centers Financial Institutions Retail (MXD) Loft Apartments (MXD) 14. Hotels and Motels 14. Hotels and Motels* 15. Downtown Form-Based 15. General Urban Frontage - Code Residential Retail Commercial Municipal Townhouse/Small Apartment Frontage - Single-family dwellings Smaller attached structures Live-work units**** Detached Frontage - Single-family dwellings Workshop Frontage - Small-scale manufacturing and repair 26

23 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 16. Light 16. Warehousing Industrial/Business Park Business Park is intended to allow a mix of office; light industrial; and limited retail and service uses in a planned setting of 15 acres or more. Light Manufacturing Limited Office Screened Outdoor Storage Public Storage Business Park (mix of warehousing, light manufacturing, office and limited retail) 17. Industrial 17. Warehousing Light Manufacturing Bus Barns Lumber Yards Moving, transfer or storage plants Offices Retail Commercial 18. Public and Semipublic These uses are allowed in residentially zoned areas. The City considers areas shown for the various residential categories as appropriate for church and school sites. 18. Public Buildings and Facilities (government, post offices, police and fire stations, etc.) Public and Parochial Schools Churches and Temples Utilities* Hospitals* 27

24 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 18. Public and Semipublic 18. Private Clubs and Service continued Organizations Airports and Other Major Transportation Facilities Cemeteries 19. Parks, Recreation, and 19. Public Parks and Open Space Private Parks and Open Space Open Space The location of future parks is based upon the following criteria: Public and Private Golf Courses a. Maximum use by Softball, Soccer and Other surrounding Sports Complexes residents Conservation Areas Floodplain b. Continues develop- Greenway Linkages ment of the neighborhood park concept. c. Where possible, park sites will be located adjacent to proposed school sites to ensure maximum usage and to avoid duplication of services. Low-Intensity Agriculture Reserves and Urban Forests 28

25 Table 3 continued Comparison Between the Future Development Plan Land Use Categories and Typical Land Uses Future Development Plan Land Use Categories Existing Land Uses Typical Land Uses 19. Parks, Recreation, and. Open Space continued d. For optimum management and conservation of natural waterway, floodplains and open space areas of unique environmental or historic value * These uses require a Special Use Permit. ** These categories are currently found only in the unincorporated portion of Johnson County identified on the map as the Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area. *** A Neighborhood center is limited to a maximum of 150,000 square feet of building space or a 16-acre tract whichever is less. A Community center is greater than 150,000 square feet and up to 400,000 square feet of building space or a 43-acre tract whichever is less. A Regional center will have greater than 400,000 square feet of building space on a tract of 43 acres or more. **** Live-work units limited to defined areas on Downtown Form District- Regulating Plan. Note: These land uses are only representative, they are not all inclusive. Also, some uses may be found in other categories, but, in general, they will fall under the Future Development Plan land use categories as listed. 29

26 Relationship With the Comprehensive Plan Text The past, present, and future trends that have occurred, or are anticipated to occur, are examined in the Plan Elements text. The twelve Plan Elements are: Community Resources; Education and Information; Environmental Review; Housing; Land Use; Utilities; Economic Profile; Parks & Recreation; Population Profile; Transportation; Neighborhoods, and Public Art. While each of these plan elements is important in projecting the future development pattern of Overland Park, they are not the only sources of information used in preparing the City s Future Development Plan. Other major sources include the current policies and guidelines of the City s Governing Body, the Planning Commission, and affected jurisdictions. In addition, the desires and needs of the local residents, as expressed through community surveys, were also considered in the preparation of the Future Development Plan. By merging these information sources together and using professional planning techniques, the City s future development pattern was formulated. As the policies of the City and the needs of its residents change, the Future Development Plan is updated to reflect these changes. Obviously, no longrange plan for an urban area can be totally accurate in its projections. As technology, social goals, and economic conditions continue to shift, and as trends in urban development respond to these changes, the City s future development pattern should be reviewed to ensure that these changes are incorporated into the Future Development Plan. Proposed Changes to be Shown on the Comprehensive Plan Maps An annual review process takes place to keep the Comprehensive Plan maps current and to make certain that they reflect Overland Park s goals and polices. Proposed changes to the maps are usually one of two types: those which make the maps comply with zoning and other land use changes, or those which reflect changes in the City s future land use pattern (as suggested by the Planning Commission). This year s changes to the Comprehensive Plan Maps begin on the next page. 30

27 See Tables and the corresponding Maps for a list of changes to the following documents: 1. Future Development Plan 2. Greenway Linkages Plans for Northern and Southern Overland Park 3. Bike Network Map Table. Compliance and Suggested Changes to the Future Development Plan Change Location Reason 1. Change from Industrial to Low-Density Residential 2. Change from Industrial to Office 3. Change to Low- Density Residential (annexed) 4. Change to Low- Density Residential (annexed) 5. Change from Office to Medium-Density Residential 6. Proposed Medium- Density Elderly 7. Medium-Density Elderly Development (change to existing) Vicinity of the northeast corner of 159 th St. and Mission Rd. Vicinity of the northeast corner of 110 th St. and Glenwood St. Vicinity of the northwest corner of 183 rd St. and State Line Rd. Vicinity of the southwest corner of 175 th St. and Kenneth Rd. Vicinity of the northeast corner of 135 th St. and Rosehill Rd. Vicinity of the northwest corner of 127 th St. and Metcalf Ave. Vicinity of the southwest corner of 75 th St. and Antioch Rd. Case No. REZ Case No. REZ Case No. REZ Case No. REZ Case No. REZ Case No. SUP Main Street Assisted Living Complex 8. School Site (change Vicinity of the northeast corner of Arbor View Elementary to existing) 175 th St. and Grant St. School 31

28 9. Change to Low- Vicinity of the northeast corner of Case No. REZ Density Residential 167 th St. and Hardy St. 10. Change to Vicinity of the southwest corner of Case No. REZ Commercial 159 th St. and Foster St. 11. Change to Low- Vicinity of the northwest corner of To reflect the state of Density Residential 175 th St. and Antioch Rd. the Coffee Creek floodplain Table. Compliance and Suggested Changes to the Greenway Linkages Maps (North) Change Location Reason 1. Added Type 1 Linkage. Indian Creek Parkway and Roe Avenue. To place another linkage along Indian Creek. Table. Compliance and Suggested Changes to the Greenway Linkages Maps (South) Change Location Reason 1. Added Type 2 Linkage. 119 th Street between Quivira Road and Nieman Road. To connect the existing Linkage with the onstreet bike network. 32

29 2. Added Type 5 Linkage. 3. Added Type 2 Linkage. Adjacent to US 69 Highway between 116 th Street and 127 th Street. Nall Avenue between 135 th Street and 159 th Street. To add another offstreet linkage adjacent to US 69 HWY. To complete the thoroughfare linkage. 4. Added Type 2 Linkage. 151 st Street and Nall Avenue. To add another linkage along 151 st Street. 5. Added Type 2 Linkage. 6. Added Type 1 Linkage. 7. Changed the alignment of an existing Linkage. 8. Changed from Type 3 Linkage to On-Street Bike Route. 9. Added a Type 1 Linkage. 10. Added Type 4 Linkage. 11. Added Type 4 Linkage. 12. Added Type 4 Linkage. 13. Added Type 3 Linkage. 151 st Street between Mission Road and State Line Road. Kingston Lake Park to Brittany Park. Lowell Avenue between 151 st Street and 159 th Street. Grant Street between Switzer Road and 165 th Street. Between Grant Street and Switzer Road. Between Lackman Road and Pflumm Road. Between 175 th Street and 183 rd Street. Between 183 rd Street and 191 st Street. South boundary of the Overland Park Arboretum. To complete linkage along 151 st Street. To add a potential grade-separated linkage across US 69 Highway. To reflect the change in the BluHawk development. To reflect existing development. To add another offstreet connection. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. 33

30 14. Added Type 3 Linkage. 15. Added Type 3 Linkage. 16. Added Type 2 Linkage. 17. Added Type 4 Linkage. Between 191 st Street and the Overland Park Arboretum. Between Antioch Road and 191 st Street. 175 th Street between Mission Road and State Line Road. South of 175 th Street between Mission Road and State Line Road. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. To add a linkage along a Proposed Collector Street. To complete the linkage with the City limits. To complete the linkage within newly a newly-annexed area. Table. Compliance and Suggested Changes to the Bike Network Map Change Location Reason 1. Changed the alignment of the Bike Network. South of 183 rd Street between Pflumm Road and Quivira Road. To reflect the change in the alignment of a Proposed Collector Street. 34

31 47th St COMPLIANCE AND SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE 2014 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN É I-35 Quivira Rd Johnson Dr Shawnee Mission Pkwy 67th St 71st St 75th St 79th St 83rd St 87th St 91st St 95th St 99th St 103rd St I-435 Pflumm Rd College Blvd 119th St 127th St 135th St 143rd St 151st St 167th St 179th St 183rd St Nall Ave 159th St Pflumm Rd Antioch Rd US 69 Quivira Rd Switzer Rd State Line Rd US 69 Switzer Rd I-35 Antioch Rd 7 Lowell Rd Metcalf A ve Lamar Ave Nall Ave 2 Nall Ave Roe Ave Mission Rd 6 5 Lackman Rd 167th St 175th St 183rd St Metcalf Ave Ave M etcalf Mission Rd 175th St 1 Kenneth Rd 4 3 Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area 191st St 199th St 207th St th St

32 COMPLIANCE AND SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE 2014 GREENWAY LINKAGES PLAN For Northern Overland Park 47th St É Metcalf Ave Johnson Dr A - Added new On-Street Bike Routes acquired from recent Bike Study. Antioch Rd Lowell Rd Shawnee Mission Pkwy 67th St 71st St I-35 75th St US 69 79th St 83rd St 87th St 91st St Quivira Rd Switzer Rd Lamar Ave Nall Ave I-35 95th St 99th St 1 103rd St I-435 College Blvd Pflumm Rd Nall Ave Roe Ave Mission Rd 119th St 36

33 71st St Pflumm Rd Quivira Rd US 69 Switzer Rd 75th St 79th St 83rd St 87th St 91st St 95th St 99th St 103rd St I-435 College Blvd 119th St 127th St 135th St 143rd St 151st St Pflumm Rd Antioch Rd 167th St Nall Ave 159th St State Line Rd US 69 I-35 Antioch Rd COMPLIANCE AND SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE 2014 GREENWAY LINKAGES PLAN For Southern Overland Park É I-35 Lamar Ave Nall Ave Nall Ave Roe Ave Mission Rd A - Added new On-Street Bike Routes acquired from recent Bike Study. 1 2 B - Added Future Grade Separation symbol to the map legend and to areas on the map where linkage will incur a grade change Lackman Rd 167th St 175th St rd St 12 Quivira Rd Switzer Rd Metcalf Ave 191st St 199th St Ave M etcalf 179th St 183rd St Mission Rd 175th St Kenneth Rd Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area 207th St 37

34 47th St COMPLIANCE AND SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE Lowell Rd Metcalf A ve Johnson Dr Shawnee Mission Pkwy 2014 BIKEWAY NETWORK É I-35 Quivira Rd 67th St 71st St 75th St 79th St 83rd St 87th St 91st St 95th St 99th St 103rd St I-435 College Blvd Pflumm Rd 119th St 127th St 135th St 143rd St 151st St 159th St 167th St Nall Ave 179th St 183rd St Pflumm Rd Antioch Rd US 69 Quivira Rd Switzer Rd State Line Rd US 69 Switzer Rd I-35 Antioch Rd Lamar Ave Nall Ave Nall Ave Roe Ave Mission Rd 167th St 175th St Ave M etcalf Mission Rd 175th St Kenneth Rd Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area Lackman Rd 183rd St 1 Metcalf Ave 191st St 199th St 207th St th St

35 OFFICIAL STREET MAP UPDATE Table. Compliance and Suggested Changes to the Official Street Map Change Location Reason 1. Changed the alignment of Switzer Road Between College Boulevard and 119 th Street To reflect the City Place mixed-use development 2. Changed 175 th Street from a Proposed Super- Collector to a Proposed Thoroughfare Between Antioch Road to Pflumm Road To maintain consistency of thoroughfares along county section lines 3. Changed the alignment of a Proposed Collector Street 4. Added several Proposed Local Public Streets Between 159 th Street and 167 th Street Between Quivira Road and Pflumm Road To reflect the BluHawk commercial development To provide an east- west connection between the thoroughfares 5. Changed the alignment of a Proposed Collector Street 6. Removed a portion of a Proposed Collector Street 7. Changed the alignment of a Proposed Collector Street Between Quivira Road and Lackman Road South of 167 th Street between Quivira Road and Switzer Road The intersection of Grant Street and 179th Street To reflect proposed singlefamily development and to cross more even terrain To avoid a stream crossing to connect with 167 th Street To reflect approved plans for the future elementary school and Arbor View subdivision. 39

36 I 47th St COMPLIANCE AND SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE 2014 STREET NETWORK/ OFFICIAL STREET MAP É I-35 Quivira Rd Johnson Dr Shawnee Mission Pkwy 67th St 71st St 75th St 79th St 83rd St 87th St 91st St 95th St 99th St 103rd St Pflumm Rd 119th St I-435 College Blvd 127th St 135th St 143rd St 151st St 159th St 167th St 179th St 183rd St Nall Ave Pflumm Rd Antioch Rd US 69 Quivira Rd Switzer Rd State Line Rd US 69 Switzer Rd I-35 Antioch Rd Lowell Rd Metcalf A ve Lamar Ave Nall Ave A - Added Proposed Local Public street designation to the Legend B - Changes to the back of the map. 1 Nall Ave Roe Ave Mission Rd 3 Lackman Rd 167th St 175th St 183rd St Metcalf Ave Ave M etcalf Mission Rd 175th St Kenneth Rd Blue Valley Plan Urban Fringe Area 191st St 199th St 207th St th St