Table of Contents. Executive Summary... vii

Similar documents
Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Executive Summary. Section II: Objectives Issues & Opportunities. Section III: District Recommendations. Oak-to-Ninth Avenue District

Illustrative Development Plan

M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t

STAFF REPORT. Oakland City Planning Commission. # 2. Location: Oak Street to Ninth Avenue

Objectives. Section II: Objectives 21

Summary Community Workshop #6 Beacon Day School Saturday, November 14, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

City Center Neighborhood Plan

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN Final Plan. 2. Vision & Goals. 2.1 Community-Based Goals and Objectives

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

CITY OF WAUKEGAN MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINES

Affordability & Equity

PHASE 3-4 PARKS SOUTH PARK AND CHANNEL PARK

STAFF REPORT. Oakland City Planning Commission. #1. Location: Oak Street to Ninth Avenue

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

III. Design Principles

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Oakland City Planning Commission Design Review Committee

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

OAK TO 9 TH BROOKLYN BASIN PRELIMINARY DESIGN GUIDELINES January 25, 2006 DRAFT

Stockton Waterfront Master Plan. Waterfront Master Plan

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

Attachment B Summary of Plan Alternatives Report

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Niagara Region Official Plan. Table of Contents

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Creating a Main Street Strategy A Roadmap to a Community s Future

Introduction 1. Contents. Draft:

I. Regional and City Context

MARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS

3.1 Existing Land Use

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

Chapter 1: Introduction

Our Legacy Projects DOWNTOWN JACKSONVILLE MASTER PLAN

Reclaiming Old West Broad Street: I-16 Ramp Removal Study

1. PLANNING CONCEPTS. Central Petaluma Specific Plan Chapter 1. Planning Concepts Page 7

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MASTER PLAN SEATTLE CAMPUS

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

DRAFT City of Titusville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements April 16, 2018

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Table 8-4: Road Classification Local Roads, second table, of Chapter 8 Create a Multi-Modal City, be amended by adding the following:

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

CITY OF RENO APRIL Progressive Urban Management Associates (P.U.M.A.) in association with. Economic and Planning Systems (EPS)

Downtown Cleveland s Main Avenue Bridge

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Downtown Dubuque...it s a great time.

Sub-committee on Harbour Plan Review of Harbour-front Enhancement Committee. Ninth Meeting

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

Albert Lea. Redevelopment Plan. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: (763) Fax: (763) wsbeng.

City of Nogales General Plan

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

THE GAS PLANT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN SCENARIO 2. COMMUNITY MEETING August 6, 2018

Academics Efficient use of space will be used to enhance investments in new pedagogies such as active learning classrooms.

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Campus Master Plan Stage 3 Stakeholders' Engagement Report

AREA-WIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Greenways and Trails Plan Update. Executive Summary. Date

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Highest & Best Use Study Marina Park Lands

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

W O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

Walnut Creek BART Station

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

SECTION I: VISION. The Preserve Specific Plan

SECTION IV: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS. Mixed-Use

Transit - Oriented Development in a Changing Urban Corridor

Ship Creek Redevelopment

The GATEWAYS Sub Area Master Plan. City of Walker

Transcription:

Table of Contents Executive Summary... vii Section I: Background...1 Introduction... 3 Study History... 3 Purpose and Role of the Plan... 6 Plan Organization... 7 The Estuary Shoreline... 11 Multiple Jurisdictions... 14 Trends in Military Use of the Shoreline... 15 Emerging Roles for the Estuary Shoreline... 18 Section II: Objectives... 21 Land Use... 23 Market Trends... 23 Issues and Opportunities... 28 Land Use Objectives... 29 Shoreline Access and Public Spaces... 33 Shoreline Access... 33 Issues and Opportunities... 36 Shoreline Access & Public Space Objectives... 37 Executive Summary iii

Regional Circulation & Local Street Network... 43 Barriers... 43 Issues and Opportunities... 44 Regional Circulation & Local Street Network Objectives... 45 Section III: District Recommendations...51 Jack London District... 53 Land Use... 56 Shoreline Access and Public Spaces... 67 Regional Circulation, Local Street Improvements Transit & Parking... 73 Oak to Ninth Street District... 83 Shoreline Access & Public Spaces... 86 Land Use... 92 Regional Circulation & Local Access... 95 San Antonio/Fruitvale District... 103 Land Use... 103 Shoreline Access & Public Spaces... 113 Regional Circulation & Local Street Improvements... 116 Section IV: Moving Forward... 125 Steps Towards Implementing the Estuary Policy Plan... 127 Summary of Land Use Classifications... 132 Appendix:... 139 A. Jack London District Potential Designated Historic Properties & Districts... 141 Index...... 142 Credits... 144 iv Oakland Estuary Policy Plan

List of Figures I-1. Regional Context... 4 I-2. Oakland Neighborhoods Adjacent to Estuary... 5 I-3. Planning Area Districts... 7 1-4. Activity Centers... 13 I-5. Jurisdictions...16 & 17 II-1. Existing Land Use...24 & 25 II-2. Existing Public Access and Open Space...34 & 35 II-3. Illustrative ShorelineAccessandPublicSpacePlan...40 & 41 II-4. Illustrative Circulation Plan...46 & 47 III-1. Jack London District: Current Ownership... 54 III-2. Jack London District: Existing Land Use... 55 III-3. Central Jack London District: Illustrative Development Strategy... 58 III-4. Jack London District: Existing Public Access and Open Space... 65 III-5. Jack London District: Illustrative Shoreline Access and Public Space Plan... 66 III-6. Jack London District: Illustrative Circulation... 72 III-7a & b. Jack London District Illustrative Street Cross Sections...76 & 78 III-8. Oak to 9th District: Current Ownership... 84 III-9. Oak to 9th District: Existing Land Use... 85 III-10. Oak to 9th District Illustrative Public Space Key Map... 87 III-11. Oak to 9th: Bird s-eye Illustrative Perspective... 89 III-12. Clinton Basin Illustrative Cross Section...96 & 97 III-13. 5th Avenue Illustrative Cross Section... 98 III-14. Oak to 9th District: Illustrative Circulation... 99 III-15. San Antonio/Fruitvale District: Current Ownership... 104 III-16. San Antonio/Fruitvale District: Existing Land Use... 105 III-17. San Antonio/Fruitvale District Sub-District Map... 106 III-18. San Antonio/Fruitvale District: Illustrative Cross Sections... 117 III-19. San Antonio/Fruitvale Illustrative Circulation...118 & 119 Executive Summary v

III-20. San Antonio/Fruitvale District: Illustrative Cross Sections (cont d...120 & 121 III-21. Fruitvale Avenue Illustrative Cross Sections...122 IV-1. Land Use Classifications... 130 & 131 Appendix A. Jack London District Potential Designated Historic Properties & Districts... 141 vi Oakland Estuary Policy Plan

Executive Summary As the twenty-first century approaches, national and international trends have created new opportunities for the urban waterfront and its role for the City of Oakland. Recognizing this potential and the strategic nature of the Oakland Estuary, the Port of Oakland and City of Oakland have undertaken the preparation of this plan to reinforce Oakland s identity as a livable city on the bay. The EstuaryPolicy Plan (Also referred to as the Estuary Plan ) includes objectives and policies to enhance the future of the area of Oakland between Adeline Street, the Nimitz Freeway, 66th Avenue and the Estuary shoreline. The plan is a result of community concerns first articulated by the League of Women Voters in its award-winning report entitled The Waterfront: It Touches the World; HowDoes It Touch Oakland?, subsequently reinforced by the goals, objectives and policies established by the General Plan Congress in the 1998 update of the Oakland General Plan. The basic premise of the plan and its preceding efforts is that the Estuary is a resource of citywide and regional significance. This area cannot be viewed as a single-purpose district isolated from the city, but rather as a diverse and multifaceted place that connects the city and the bay. The EstuaryPolicy Plan calls for a system of open spaces and shoreline access that provides recreational use opportunities, environmental enhancement, interpretive experiences, visual amenities, and significant gathering places. A series of individual parks, open spaces and shoreline access points, connected by a continuous landscaped parkway with promenades, bikeways and shoreline trails, is recommended. In addition to enhancing existing facilities, new parks are proposed at the mouth of the Lake Merritt Channel, at the site of the Ninth Avenue Terminal, at Union Point, and within the Jack London District. Further, the Estuary Plan proposes a variety of uses that strengthen Oakland s position as an urban center, accommodate economic growth, and encourage development that complements the downtown and adjacent neighborhoods. The plan reinforces the Jack London District as the East Bay s primary dining and entertainment venue, by promoting mixture of retail, dining, entertainment and visitor-serv- Executive Summary vii

ing uses oriented to significant gathering places and public access areas along the water. The plan proposes the preservation of industrial areas which are necessary to support Oakland s port, as well as the city s role in food processing, manufacturing and distribution. In addition, the emerging trend toward loft-type residential and off-price retail establishments in the Jack London District is encouraged to continue. The plan proposes the large-scale transformation of the area from the Lake Merritt Channel to the Ninth Avenue Terminal into a mix of artisan work/live lofts, hotel, cultural and commercial-recreational uses that will complement the planned open spaces and parks along the water. The plan recommends strengthening the livability of existing and future residential development within the Kennedy Tract, and suggests new opportunities for small-scale office, business and commercial establishments. In certain areas (e.g., around the Con-Agra facility in the San Antonio/Fruitvale District), the plan supports the retention of existing industries, but acknowledges that they may relocate for a variety of reasons. If that occurs, the plan suggests land use priorities for an appropriate transition to new urban development in the future. The Estuary Policy Plan also proposes significant measures to improve both regional and local access. The proposed circulation system is aimed at reducing the barrier effect of the freeway by improving on and off ramps and by enhancing local vehicular access to inland areas. The plan recommends creating a continuous landscaped recreational parkway, accommodating pedestrians and bicycles as well as transit and vehicular access, along the entire five-anda-half-mile length of waterfront, between 66th Avenue and the Jack London District. This parkway would help knit together the diverse parts of the Estuary shoreline, thereby establishing an identity of Oakland as a waterfront city. The Estuary Policy Plan also emphasizes the need for connection between waterfront uses and inland areas. The plan promotes entertainment-oriented development in the Jack London District, and extending waterfront activities along Lower Broadway, toward the downtown. At the same time, development of the area between Estuary Park and the Ninth Avenue Terminal will create a significant place for Oaklanders to gather for events, and achieve a long-held objective of connecting the Estuary to the Lake Merritt Channel, Lake Merritt, and inland neighborhoods. Redevelopment at Embarcadero Cove is planned to create additional windows to the Estuary. A new park at Union Point and improvements to the shoreline should create a new focus along the water for Brooklyn Basin, San Antonio, Fruitvale, Central East Oakland, and other inland neighborhoods. Extension of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline westward to High Street will also provide open space opportunities for East Oakland residents and visitors to enjoy the environment of San Leandro Bay. Finally, the Estuary Policy Plan recommends some critical first steps in implementing the plan and achieving the vision. It identifies what is necessary to move on to the next level of action. viii Oakland Estuary Policy Plan

In total, the EstuaryPolicy Plan is a waypoint in a community-wide dialogue that has been underway for many years. It follows up on ideas that were first presented several decades ago; more recently reinforced by the League of Women Voters and the Oakland General Plan. It is both a recognition of the importance of this unique asset to Oakland, and a long-range vision of the Estuary s potential. At the same time, the plan initiates a series of steps that can achieve the vision. By beginning now, and working hard, Oakland can enhance the waterfront, fulfill its unmet potential, and reclaim its role as a true waterfront city. Executive Summary ix

x Oakland Estuary Policy Plan