PRINCIPLE 4: Create walkable neighborhoods

Similar documents
PRINCIPLE 6: Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas

PRINCIPLE 8: Provide a variety of transportation choices

PRINCIPLE 7: Strengthen and direct development toward existing communities

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

What s in a Name Sustainability, Smart Growth, New Urbanism

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

hermitage town center

Municipal Plan*Assessment

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

Zoning Code Issues Prioritization

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

PROTECT AND PROMOTE QUALITY OF LIFE AND LIVABILITY FOR THE CITIZENS OF GAINESVILLE THROUGH QUALITY URBAN DESIGN.

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

Planning Board Briefing

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Access Management: An Overview

MISSION STREETSCAPE PLAN. Neighborhood Commercial Streets handle continuous activity. Neighborhood Commercial STREET ROW: Main Design Treatments

CALL FOR ARTIST QUALIFICATIONS SUBMISSIONS. DIA Urban Arts Projects Phase One

Master Planning: Cuba, New York Phase II. Dr. John Anderson President Alfred State College. Alfred New York

Guiding Principles. People dance, and to share culture. Place consistency and internal connections. Management community for years to come

Community Assistantship Program. Milaca Downtown Revitalization

STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS

IMAGE AND DESIGN. Guiding Principles

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

Roanoke Rapids Streetscape Master Plan. City Council Presentation

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Age Friendly Design ( 2:15 Breakout Session )

Nader Obied Abd al raheem hathat. Dr. Farid S. Al-Qeeq

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

PILLAR FOUR INTEGRATE LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION

Guiding Principles, Objectives, Strategies and Policies

A Healthy Future Walkability Through Community Design. Fit Families North Carolina October 18, 2004

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Vegetable Gardening Award Application

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

Need for better accessibility on Karl Johans gate (street) Project Levende Oslo (Oslo Alive)

Copake Hamlet Plan: Visioning Workshop

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Neighborhood Districts

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

1 Adapted from the Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study by CalTrans, 2006

Regions are Growing...

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

8implementation. strategies

Preservation Planning

THE CIVIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

TEXAS CHAPTER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2019 PROFESSIONAL AWARDS GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

The Auburn Plan Designing the Future of Auburn February 28, 2005

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

NORTHGATE AREA. Design Guidelines. Effective, final draft: 2 may 02. City of Seattle Department of Design, Construction & Land Use

Chapter 4: The Vision

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

HE VISION. Building a Better Connected Place

MEMO 1. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE & PROCESS REQUEST

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

City of Lake Mary, Florida. Evolution of a Historic Downtown with Transit Oriented Development Strategies

Town Center Design Guidelines

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Local Placemaking Opportunities

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

AESTHETIC APPEARANCE. Design Guidelines for Grade-Separated Pedestrian, Cyclist and Equestrian Structures

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

6. BUILDINGS AND SPACES OF HUMAN SCALE

Transcription:

HOW TO APPLY SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES TO RURAL COMMUNITIES PRINCIPLE 4: Create walkable neighborhoods A product of AND A cooperative publication from the Stennis Institute of Government and Community Development and Extension Service at Mississippi State University.

A product of AND Smart Growth for Small Towns Series Smart Growth for Small Towns is a cooperative project between the Extension Service faculty of the Department of Landscape Architecture and the Stennis Institute of Government and Community Development at Mississippi State University. For more information contact Jeremy Murdock, Research Associate at Jeremy@sig.msstate.edu or Michael Seymour, Associate Extension Professor at Michael.Seymour@msstate.edu. Visit the Stennis Institute at www.sig.msstate.edu and the Extension Service at www.extension.msstate.edu for more information about our programs and services. View the entire Smart Communities series at www.sig.msstate.edu/smartgrowth and www.msucares.com/smart-growth-for-small-towns 2015 Mississippi State University This publication may be copied and distributed without alteration for nonprofit educational purposes provided that credit is given to the Stennis Institute and Mississippi State University Extension Service.

HOW TO APPLY SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES TO RURAL COMMUNITIES TEN PRINCIPLES OF SMART GROWTH: Introduction Smart Growth for Small Towns relates the principles of Smart Growth to towns and rural communities, providing examples, discussion, explanation and advice on community design and development. The educational information provided on this site is intended to contribute to an understanding of the intent and purpose of the Smart Growth principles. However, planning for the future of our small towns requires input from a variety of fields and includes issues of design, policy making and governance. This series is focused primarily upon design issues associated with small towns and is intended to serve as a resource for government officials, teachers, designers, and the general public. The explanation of each Smart Growth principle includes the following: A. Discussion of the purpose of the principles and why it is important. B. Strategies that communities can use to help achieve the goals of the principle. 1. Mix land uses 2. Take advantage of compact building design 3. Create a range of housing opportunities and choices 4. Create walkable neighborhoods 5. Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place 6. Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas 7. Strengthen and direct development toward existing communities 8. Provide a variety of transportation choices 9. Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective 10. Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions 1

SMART COMMUNITIES PRINCIPLE 4: Create walkable neighborhoods An intimate, visually interesting street encourages walking and invites lingering in Kiawah, South Carolina. (Photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour). A. DISCUSSION Why is it important to create walkable neighborhoods? cise are slightly different, it isn t difficult for communities to accommodate both types of walking. In both cases, an interesting, comfortable walking environment is the key. There are a number of good reasons to make neighborhoods walkable including the potential for improved health of the residents, environmental benefits from reduced car trips and the opportunity to build community by creating connections between citizens. In most small towns, there are significant obstacles to walkability but none that can t be overcome with a little planning and effort. How can we make neighborhoods more walkable? Before discussing specific approaches for improving walkability, it s important to recognize that the key factor in making neighborhoods walkable is making the experience pleasurable. No one wants to walk where they don t feel safe or the experience isn t pleasant. When distances are too long, the walk is uncomfortable and there s no shade, few people are going to elect to walk to their destination. While destination travel and walking for exer- 2 Recreational walking (aka walking for exercise) may be enhanced by lengthy dedicated pathways, but the amount of space required can sometimes discourage destination-oriented walking (Photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour).

B. STRATEGIES Provide shade and pedestrian amenities Create narrow lots and interconnected streets Much of the year, shade is critical for walking comfort. One of the easiest ways to create shade for pedestrians is by planting large canopy trees. In more urbanized settings, overhead structures that cover the sidewalk and protect shoppers from sun and rain may be a better long-term solution. In many situations, seating and appropriate street lighting can also help to encourage more walking. Walking is enjoyable when the distance is manageable. The shorter the distance, the more likely someone is going to elect to walk. While this idea is simple, getting people to accept the idea of living on a smaller lot may be difficult. Yet there can be many benefits to living on a smaller home site, including reduced costs and maintenance. A small, well-designed home and landscape can be just as relaxing and private as a large estate with the added benefit of more free time and money for the residents. It also can free more space in the community for parks and green space that can be used as neighborhood amenities. Providing an interconnected web of streets is important for making walking a reasonable transportation option. When blocks are long, it s less likely that residents will be able to reach their destination easily. A grid of reasonably small blocks provides a range of travel options and can also help to reduce speeding car traffic. Slow car traffic Walking is comfortable where cars are moving slowly and cautiously. The key is to design neighborhood streets that accommodate cars, but require drivers to be cautious. There are many design techniques to calm car traffic, but the essential idea is to create narrow, intimate streets that require drivers to pay close attention. No matter the speed limit, a wide road with few obstacles is a temptation that most drivers are unable to resist. So it s critical not to tempt drivers but instead force them to share the road. Wide roads and openness encourage faster driving and make it challenging for pedestrians to make crossings (Photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour). The continuous canopy that covers the Aberdeen, Mississippi, downtown shopping district provides shade and protection for pedestrians and shoppers. (Photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour). Provide space for pedestrians and consider linkages across streets It may seem obvious, but providing a safe, comfortable space for pedestrians is critical. This doesn t always have to be a dedicated sidewalk but it does require planning, forethought and careful consideration of connections and linkages for walkers and those who are disabled. Pedestrian traffic requires the same consideration, care and planning as car traffic. Particular care should be given to road crossings so that pedestrians don t have to wait too long or make wide crossings. In particular, downtown crosswalks should be highly visible and clearly signal for drivers to share the road. Curb extensions are great strategies for recapturing wasted space, calming automobile traffic, reducing crossing distances for pedestrians, and providing space for landscaping (Photograph: 2013 Jeremy Murdock). 3

In residential areas, build close to the street and include porches There are few places more fun to walk than an intimate, shaded neighborhood street with small, streetside gardens and actively-used front porches. While the size of these spaces may vary somewhat depending on the district, in most cases the landscapes in front of low-rise suburban homes are too wide and the porches too shallow for residents to use. Wide lots discourage walkability while stingy, narrow porches lack comfort. When streetside landscapes are appropriately designed their slender, intricate front gardens and generous porches create a useful, semi-private zone that encourages interactions between neighbors and visitors. Walking in this type of neighborhood never gets boring. These small streetside gardens and generous elevated porches welcome visitors and make walking more interesting (Left photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour; Right photograph: 2014 Jeremy Murdock). Put cars and parking in their proper place Cars have come to dominate our public landscapes and streetscapes to an extreme extent. The problem with making cars our primary design concern is the amount of hard surfacing and space they require. When this paving and parking isn t designed in a balanced manner taking into account the needs of both cars and pedestrians we end up with streetscapes that are uninviting and neighborhoods that feel unlivable. On retail sites and districts, a significant amount of automobiles can be accommodated in the form of onstreet parking which can help to slow traffic and shield pedestrians from the street. Parking lots, on the other hand, should most often be located in unobtrusive areas behind buildings. All parking lots should be designed to minimize the width and number of curb cuts, reduce the quantity of paving and present a compelling and interesting face to the public in order to encourage walking and preserve the safety of pedestrians. Long stretches of pavement, lack of shade trees, poor views, uncomfortable slopes and multiple curb cuts make walking an unpleasant experience (Photograph: 2014 Michael Seymour). 4

Mr. Jeremy Murdock Stennis Institute, Mississippi State University 662.325.1658 jeremy@sig.msstate.edu Jeremy Murdock is a Research Associate II with the John C. Stennis Institute of Government and Community Development at Mississippi State University. He is heavily involved in ground-level community development issues, especially those related to design and planning. His current work is aimed at educating the communities of Mississippi about sound design and planning principles and their impact on economic development. Mr. Murdock, a native of Olive Branch, Mississippi, obtained both a bachelor s and master s degree in landscape architecture from Mississippi State University. Following graduate school, Mr. Murdock entered the world of community development and has worked with numerous Mississippi communities. He is passionate about downtown revitalization and small town development, and he uses design as a tool to enhance the quality of life in the communities of the state. Mr. Murdock is heavily entrenched in community development, both professionally and personally. He is an active volunteer and advocate for quality of life issues and serves on numerous boards and committees in his own community of Starkville, Mississippi. These include the Planning and Zoning Commission, Convention and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors, and the Starkville Main Street Design Committee. In recent years he also served on the Starkville Area Arts Council Board of Directors, Starkville in Motion Board of Directors, and the Starkville Beautification Committee among others. Mr. Michael Seymour Department of Landscape Architecture/Extension Service, Mississippi State University 662.325.7897 Michael.Seymour@msstate.edu Michael W. Seymour is an Associate Extension Professor and the Graduate Coordinator in the Department of Landscape Architecture at Mississippi State University where he has taught a wide variety of courses including landscape graphics, history of landscape architecture, golf course design and both undergraduate and graduate design studios. He has an undergraduate degree in fine art from Centenary College of Louisiana and a Master s degree in Landscape Architecture from Louisiana State University. He is a licensed landscape architect and has prior professional experience in the public sector as the Director of an Arts District and in private practice at Lucido and Associates in Stuart, Florida. His practice experiences included a wide variety of neighborhood, commercial, civic, institutional and residential developments. His research has focused on landscape history, including the evolution and growth of small towns and the courthouse squares of Mississippi. Professor Seymour s teaching has been recognized with a number of awards including the university s highest teaching honor, the Grisham Master Teacher award, and the national Excellence in Teaching recognition of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture. He has been involved in many teaching training sessions and workshops for faculty and currently serves as Faculty Associate with MSU s Center for Teaching Learning. A product of AND 5

Stennis Institute of Government and Community Development P.O Drawer LV Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 662.325.3328 Mississippi State University Extension Service Department of Landscape Architecture Box 9725 Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 662.325.3012 JANUARY 2015 2015 Mississippi State University This publication may be copied and distributed without alteration for nonprofit educational purposes provided that credit is given to the Stennis Institute and Mississippi State University Extension Service. Discrimination based upon race, color, religion, sex, national orgin, age, sexual orientation, disability, or veteran s status is a violation of federal and state law and MSU policy and will not be tolerated.