RESOLUTION NO

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116

RESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. This ordinance, due to its length and corresponding cost of

PC RESOLUTION NO

Agenda Report DESIGNATION OF 1855 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (FORMER DRAPER'S BUILDING) AS A LANDMARK

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING

ORDINANCE NO

The maximum amounts shown in the Engineer s Report for each of those categories for FY 2008/09 are as follows (per house/per year):

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

Design Review Commission Report

RESOLUTION NO. PC

PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS

ORDINANCE NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. November 10, 2016

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

RESOLUTION NO

S P E C I F I C DEVELOPMENT NO. 78 A M E N D M E N T APPLICATION C I T Y C O U N C I L A C T I O N S E P T E M B E R 1 9,

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Consideration of a request for a waiver of the critical slopes ordinance. Brian Haluska, Neighborhood Planner, Neighborhood Development Services

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE LONGWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY EXPANSION & RENOVATION; STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (SEQRA) RESOLUTION

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

codes for the operation of City business; and WHEREAS, the Bonita Springs City Council has determined that it is in

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

Planning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015

CITY OF MORRO BAY PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 955 SHASTA AVENUE. MORRO BAY, CA

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN BAUTISTA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

MINUTES OF TOWN BOARD MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 18, 2017 AT 7:00 PM AT TOWN HALL, ONE OVEROCKER ROAD POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

The full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.

Planning Commission Report

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division. STAFF REPORT: # Addendum AGENDA ITEM: 4.1

RESOLUTION NO

(APN: );

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Draft Motion No HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2010

DRAFT FOR COMMENT: EASTLAKE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM # 13A/B. AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting December 10, 2018

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

Planning Projects: Highlights

MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

ORDINANCE NO. 14,767

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.1 STAFF REPORT November 15, Staff Contact: Christina Corsello (707)

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

Institutional Overlay Zone (IOZ) Regulatory Framework

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. August 21, 2013 Council Meeting UPDATE ON TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN (TAM) GREENBRAE CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017

Chair Leskinen and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD RESOLUTION NO.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD RESOLUTION NO. 13,448

STAFF REPORT. Planning and Zoning Case 16-17FDP Staff: Mike Peterman, City Planner Date: April 25, 2016

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH STAFF REPORT. THROUGH: Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

APPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN CONCEPT FOR THE JEPSON PARKWAY GATEWAY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT {FEDERAL PROJECT NO. RPSTPLE-5094(050)}

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AGENDA ITEM NO. 17. Interim City Manager: Arnold Shadbehr Dir. Of Planning: Brian James

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

M E M O R A N D U M. DATE: July 19, Patrick D. O Keeffe, City Manager. Economic Development & Housing

FOR AGENCY MEETING OF: AGENDA ITEM NO.: URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BOARD STEVEN POWERS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTO#

Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Goals and Policies

CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM REQUEST CITY COMMISSION

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

4.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation

Colerain Township report to. Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission. December 2, 2010, 1:00PM. t a f f r e p o r t

M E M O R A N D U M. Brenda Garton, County Administrator Ted Wilmot, County Attorney Garrey Curry, Asst. Co. Administrator for Community Development

SUBDIVISION, REZONING, PLANNING APPROVAL, PUD & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: May 3, 2007

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 20, 2008

Transcription:

\ RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT OF PASADENA APPROVING A 15-YEAR, ihree--phase MASTER PLAN FOR LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL LOCATED AT 3880 EAST SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD I WHEREAS, La Salle High School has~ submitted an_ application for a 15-year, three-ph as~ MasterPlan that consists of fufure additions and improvements to its. existing facility located at 3880 East Sierra Madre Boulevard; and \..: '_ \. WHEREAS,. the subject property has a. Public, Semi~Public (PS) zoning. designation_ and a General Plan designation of Institutional (I); and --. )... WHEREAS, on November 10, 2015, the Design Commis.sion conducted an advisory review of the proposed Mast~r Plan for _LC! Salle HJgh School and. expressed a general support of the project w_ith the inclusion of conditions of approval related to visual impacts, ~oise, lighting, and historic' preservation; and.. '. WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting on July 13, 2016, the Planning Commission fully reviewed and discussed. the proposal,_and. recommended the City Council: 1) Confirm the findings of' the draft Initial. Environme.ntal Study and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that with th~ incorporation of mitigation measures, the propos~d Master Plan for La Salle High Schodl will have no significant or unavoidable impacts; 2) App"rove the proposed MasterPlan for La Salle High School by adopting the Findings and Conditions of Approval; and 3) Approve the removal of two protected mature trees on the La SaUe High School campus and acknowledge that the proposed landscape design, as conditioned, emphasizes. a replacement tree canopy that is sustainable over the long term by adhering to the adopted replacement matrix; and \....: WHEREAS; at its duly - noticed public meeting on September 19, 2016, the. City Council fully reviewed and discussed the proposal; and WHEREAS; as conditioned, the Master Plan is consistent with -the General Plan Land Use designation and -Zoning Ordi.nance; and,<' WHEREAS, as required by the Zoning Code, the City Council hereby finds and determin~s that: #KKMRZ1780D1Z2Wvl

Master Plan Findings 1. The proposed use is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit (Major and Minor) or Hillside Development.Permit within the applicable zoning district and complies with all applicable provisions of this Zoning Code. La Salle High School was established in the current location in 1955. The project site is designated in the Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning district and the PS zoning accurately reflects the existing land use. A "school - public and private~' is a conditionally permitted use that is allowed in the PS zonj'ng district. The proposed project will comply with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code in that development' standards for PS zoned parcels are established through a Master Plan.. The proposed Mas.ter Plan includes a defined set of development standards for setbacks, height, and minimum parking requirements, permitted uses and gross-floor area, as well as conditions of approval regulating after.:.~our events, third-party uses and other -operational restrictions. Additionally, the.propo&ed Master Plan complies with other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code such as standards for specific land uses (Schools, Private) in Section 17.50 and parkfng and lands_caping requirements in Section 17.46. The proposed use is allowed with a Master Plan and complies with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. 2. The locatioij,_of the proposed use complies with the special purposes of this Zoning Code and the purposes of the applicable zoning district. The purpose of the Pasadena Zoning Code is to protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare, and to im-plement the policies of the General Plan by classifying and regulating the uses of land and structures Within the City of Pasadena in a manner consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Master Plan is consistent with this purpose because it would allow La Salle High School to continue to operate its school and further expand and update its facilities to serve students under certain. restrictions placed on the project to protect the single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed Master Plan includes conditions of approval thatwould limit third-party events, after-hour activities, night: lighting, minimum off-street parking spaces for staff and guests, and landscaping to provide additional buffering. 3. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, eolicies, and objectives of the General Plan and the purpose and intent of any applicable specific plan. La Salle High School is proposing to continue its operation of a co-education high school in its existing location; the proposed Master Plan does not include any proposed. new uses but includes an expansion of the school. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan -in that General

Plan Policy 2.9 Institutional Uses c~lls for the City to "accommodate the development of educational, religious, cultural, and similar-facilitiesthat enrich the lives bfpasadena's residents.-" Additionally, General Plan Goal #17 supports "a strong and diverse educational system that is responsive to the Jife-long needs of the community and related to maintaining a high quality of life and a strong economy:'" Consistent with GeneraiPian Policy 17.4, through the Master Plan process, as conditioned, La Salle' and the City are collaborating to ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Master. Plan is not located within a Specific Plan area... "! 4. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use would not,, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or. working in_ the neighborhood of the proposed use. The site is comprised of a 1 D-acre sloping property located in an area with a variety of uses. It is on the south side of Sierra Madre Boulevard at the corner of Michillinda Street, on the border of Pasadena and the City of Sierra Madre.- Both Sierra Madre Boulevard and Michillinda Street are heavily trafficked streets that carry commuter traffic. North of the project $ite, across Sierra Madre Boulevard are a small shopping center and single family homes. South are single famity homes on Canfield Road, west is a church, and east, across Michillinda Street are a church and multi- and single-. family homes. Through the Master Plan,.La Salle High School would continue to. operate as a private school. All riew construction would be designed to complement the architecture ofthe existing campus. The proposed project also includes a net increase of 12 parking sp~ces, resulting in all required parking to be located onsi.te. Additionally, conditions of approval have be.en included to regulate after-hour events and operations, third-party events, parking, noise and lighting. Therefore, the proposed Master Plan would nof be detrimental to the p'ublic interest, health, safety, convenience or general. welfare of the City. 5. The use, as described and conditionally approved, woulq not be detrimental or injurious to property and imprbvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare. ofth~ City.. La Salle has been in operation in the neighborhood for over 61 years and has demonstrated that a school use is a compatible use with this neighborhood. In addition, conditions of approval will be included to further ensure the continual compatibility of the use in the neighborhood, including restrictions on.after-ho~r events, night.;.lfghting,. noise, number of studen~s,.staff, and minimum off-site parking requirements. As: described and conditioned, the 'proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.

6. The design, location, operating characteristics,. and size of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and future land :11ses in the vicinity in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and viewprotection. The design ofthe project site has been reviewed by the Design Commission du.ring Advisory Review as part of the Master Plan. process; further refinement of the material_ and finishes of the propqsed Performance Arts Center would be analyzed in-concept and Final Design Review. Any changes to the Master Plan would be reviewed as provided in the Zoning Cod~,.resulting in orderly and thorough review ofexpansion plans and proposed uses that are anticipated to occur on the La Salle High School campus_ for the next 15 years, ensuring c ompatibility with existing and future land uses ih the vicinity in terms-of aesthetics values, character,-scale and view protection. Private Tree Removal Findings I. Any permit or approval which will result in injury to or removal of a mature, landmark, landmark-eligible, native or specimen tree protected under this 'chapter snail be denied unless one of the following findings is t:nade: 1. There is a public benefit as defined in Section 8.52.024(R), or a public health, safety or welfare benefit, to the injuryror removal that outweighs the-protection of, the specific tree; or. 2. The present condition of the tree is such that it is not reasonably likely to survive; or 3. There- is an objective feature of the tree that makes the tree not suitable for the protections of this chapter; or. 4. There w.ould be a substantial hardship to a priv_ate property owner id the enjoyment and use of.real property if the injury or removal is not permitted; or' - 5. To not permit injury to or removal of a tree would constitute a taking of the underlying re~l property.; or 6. The project, as defined in Section t7.12.020, includes a landscape design plan that emphasizes a tree canopy that is sustainable over the long term by adhering to the replacement m~trix adopted by resolution of the city council and included in the associated administrative guidelines. The project proposes the removal of two protected mature trees to accommodate the proposed field house and new practice gym. Consistent with Finding # 6, the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscaping plan to show the general location of replacement trees and new landscaping on the project site. The preliminary landscap-ing. plan emphasizes a tree canopy. that is sustainable over the long term. A condition of approval is; included requiring the applicant to submij a final landscaping.' _ plan, demonstrati~g adherence to the replacement matrix adopted.by resolution the City.

Council and included in the associated administrative guidelines. The proposed replacement matrix is as follows:.\ 58 Americ~n Mature 19.5. inches DBH 2 24 inch box sweetgum 71 American Mature 19 inches D H 4 24 inch box sweetgum r.,now~ THERE;FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City:Council of City of Pasadena hereby approves the La.Salle High School M aster Plan, as shown o~ Exhibit 1, and as conditioned in Exhibit 2, both exhibits which are incorporated herein by reference. Adopted at th~ regular meeting of the, City Council on 19th day of September 2016, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES:. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MARK JOMSKY. CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: THERESA E. FUENTES ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY Exhibit 1: La Salle High School Master Plan Project Plans Exhibit 2: La Salle High School Conditions of Approval