Community Working Group Workshops - Workshop Summary September TOD Corridor Strategy and Access Planning Study. Workshop Introduction

Similar documents
DRAFT Land Use Chapter

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

From: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June 23, 2017

WELCOME and introduction

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

6.11 Land Use Introduction Regulatory Setting Regional Plans and Policies. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

Corridor-Level Approaches to Creating Transit-Oriented Districts

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

Diridon Station Area: Framework for Implementation

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

MEETING PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Page

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

4.11 Land Use Introduction Environmental and Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

A Plan for the Heart of the Region: Tukwila, WA

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

The transportation system in a community is an

Key Concepts of the General Plan

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

Public Open House #1

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Chapter 1: Introduction

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

North San José Area Development Policy

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

The Cambie Corridor 2015 Fall workshop series. What we heard WORKSHOP OUTLINE

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

Strategic Growth Area #1 Northampton Boulevard Corridor Area

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION

DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN. June 9, 2009

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Community Meeting #2.1

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN Final Plan. 2. Vision & Goals. 2.1 Community-Based Goals and Objectives

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

WHAT WE HEARD REPORT - Summary Bonnie Doon Mall Redevelopment Application (LDA )

Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

burlington mobility hubs study Downtown Burlington Mobility Hub

The Role of Cities in Planning Transportation Megaprojects

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

Further input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Berryessa BART Urban Village Plan Workshop #1 Summary

Urban Planning and Land Use

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

III. Design Principles

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Cambie Corridor Planning Program Phase Two Draft Plan. Standing Committee on City Services and Budgets May 5, 2011

Roosevelt Station: Transit-Oriented Development. Workshop #3 - February 22, 2017

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

DELIVERING ON THE TRANSIT PROMISE

Workshop. Valley Vision Stanislaus. Our Schedule. Help Shape Our Region s Future! The Scenarios. Who is StanCOG? How Do I Select a Scenario?

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group Transit Oriented Development and Transit Villages January 12, 2017

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. MTA Board Meeting May 6, 2014

4.16 Visual Quality and Aesthetics

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

TOD IMPLEMENTATION BEST PRACTICE TOOLBOX Leveraging Transit for City Shaping

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #16 February 22, 2018

Figure BE-4: Urban Form - Corridors. Urban Form and Land Use. Page BE-24 Redwood City General Plan S A N F R A N C I S C O B A Y.

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

East Central Area Plan

Transcription:

Community Working Group Workshops - Workshop Summary September 11-13 2018 TOD Corridor Strategy and Access Planning Study With VTA s BART Phase II (the Study), VTA seeks to build upon existing transportation and land use plans and policies, and provide advanced analysis and recommendations to inform future TOD policy adoption and implementation, including land use, development and transportation mobility. The Study is comprised of three major tasks: Background Conditions; Corridor Opportunities and Constraints; and Implementation Strategies and Tools. The resulting information and proposed strategies will be compiled into a Final Report, available in the spring of 2019. Working with the cities of San José and Santa Clara, as well as BART, the approximately 15-month study that began in February 2018 is focusing on feasible and implementable land use strategies and financing tools to maximize transit ridership and TOD at the three future BART Stations (Alum Rock/28th Street Station, Downtown San José Station, and Santa Clara Station) and the corridor between them. The Study will also provide specific recommendations to enhance access to the stations and TODs in and around the station corridor. Workshop Introduction On Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, September 11th, 12th and 13th 2018, VTA hosted workshops following the ongoing established Community Working Groups (CWGs) to discuss various elements of transit-oriented development (TOD) and gather input from workshop participants. The workshops focused on the three station areas included in VTA s BART Phase II Corridor TOD/Access Study: San José 28th Street/Alum Rock, San José Downtown and Santa Clara. The workshop sessions were led by members of the consultant team; Perkins+Will (architects and urban designers), Strategic Economics (economists and market analysts), with VTA staff overseeing the consultant team. Apex Strategies facilitated the three workshops. Workshop Purpose The purpose of the workshops was to provide a forum for participants to understand and discuss the Opportunities and Constraints analysis and findings of the TOD consultant team. Participants were also asked to review and provide input on the proposed opportunity sites and potential land uses and densities, and any related station access issues. The materials presented and tabled were developed by the consultant team and VTA. Workshop Format The three TOD/Access Study workshops immediately followed VTA s formal BART Phase II CWG meetings which concluded at 5.30pm. The workshops lasted approximately one-hour each, commencing with a 20-25 minute Page 1 of 8

slide presentation on the analysis and findings of the Opportunities and Constraints phase of the TOD study. Following the presentation, small groups were formed for 30-minute break-out exercises, which ended with brief report-outs to the larger group, except for Santa Clara, where participants convened as a single group. The break-out sessions were facilitated using large maps that depicted the proposed station areas, development zones and opportunity sites identified for the Study. Members of the TOD consultant team and VTA facilitated discussions about the opportunities and constraints with a particular focus on hearing about site-specific characteristics from members of the public who were very familiar with the station areas and individual opportunity sites. Summary notes from each of the three workshops are included below, in the order the workshops occurred, along with scans of the opportunity sites maps, as marked-up during the break-out discussion. Workshop Attendance and Participation September 11 th - Downtown San José Station Approximately 16 people participated in the workshop. Workshop participants included Downtown CWG members, community members, and technical staff from the City of San José. September 12 th - Alum Rock/28 th Street Station Approximately 16 people participated in the workshop. Workshop participants included Alum Rock/28 th Street CWG members, community members, and technical staff from the City of San José. September 13 th - Santa Clara Station Approximately 10 people participated in the workshop. Workshop participants included Santa Clara CWG members, community members and technical staff from the City of Santa Clara. Summary of Breakout Discussions The TOD consultant team introduced the concept of different zones for framing the discussion about the range of different uses and intensities of development. As a guiding principle for assigning the appropriate building types to specific parcels, the density zone map prioritizes highest development densities within ¼-mile walking distance from the station, shown below as Zone 1. Zone 2 prioritizes medium development densities, while Zone 4 is dedicated to the lowest development densities amongst the building types, furthest away from the Station. Zone 3 represents the corridor and prioritizes medium densities, similar to Zone 2, and emphasizes ground floor uses such as retail, restaurants and cafés which will help activate the corridor. Page 2 of 8

Page 3 of 8

Downtown Station September 11, 2018 Topics Raised/Discussed GROUP 1 Topics Raised/Discussed-GROUP 2 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF GROUP DISCUSSION, ARRANGED BY GENERAL TOPIC GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF GROUP DISCUSSION, ARRANGED BY GENERAL TOPIC Attendees suggested a sensitive, sitespecific, approach should be deployed to the historic and low-density residential single-family home context throughout the study area. Special attention should be dedicated to the Hensley Historic District and Santa Clara Street east of Downtown San José BART Station. For these areas, a maximum building height of 6 floors was suggested, with building height stepping down as it approaches the existing lowrise context. Attendees suggested allocating taller, denser buildings on opportunity sites that are located next to CA-87, between Carlisle Street and Devine Street, and next to the Guadalupe River Trail, between San Carlos Street and I-280. New development should minimize the impact from shadows. The SOFA district, currently has an active street environment. New development should capitalize and support its existing businesses. DENSITY The workshop attendees agreed with the team s proposed approach to densities and building heights tapering off from Zone 1 to Zone 4 but suggested that a few individual opportunity sites should accommodate greater development capacities. Attendees also identified greater development opportunity in the SOFA district and proposed densities and building height above the Zone 4 category. The SOFA district would also Attendees noted that more high-rise residential in downtown is acceptable but it should be accompanied with ground floor retail amenities, not just bars and restaurants. University Avenue in Palo Alto was cited as being a good example for its rich mix of retail. Attendees felt that high-rise and high density development along freeway corridors, the Santa Clara Street corridor and along the Guadalupe Trail is acceptable. Smaller scale infill (2-4 home townhome and low-rise apartments) was preferred in existing residential neighborhoods. New commercial buildings should be avoided in existing and historic residential neighborhoods (Horace Mann, Naglee Park, South University). Attendees noted that land alongside freeways is a prime location for high rise residential and commercial development. Attendees acknowledged and respected the importance of the history of the existing residential neighborhoods like Horace Mann and South University. Attendees felt commercial development should be concentrated north of San Carlos Street along First Street. Attendees stated a preference for downtown commercial development, targeting a diverse employee base and a good mix of jobs. High rise office should be prioritized between St. John Street and San Fernando Street, from Almaden Boulevard to 4 th Street. Density should be concentrated around 1 st Street and Santa Clara Street CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS Attendees expressed a desire for better mid-block linkages connecting San José Page 4 of 8

benefit from more mixed-use and affordable residential development (some is currently planned). Attendees agreed on allocating the highest densities and tallest buildings on the VTA Block in Downtown San José Attendees also noted that, while high density development is desirable, it is equally important to preserve a diversity of building types.. State University campus to the Downtown BART Station and Plaza de César Chávez. Alum Rock/28 th Street Station September 12, 2018 Topics Raised/Discussed GROUP 1 Topics Raised/Discussed-GROUP 2 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF GROUP DISCUSSION, ARRANGED BY GENERAL TOPIC GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF GROUP DISCUSSION, ARRANGED BY GENERAL TOPIC Attendees stated that proposed TOD should be consistent with previous planning efforts with specific regards to height limits as expressed in the Urban Villages plans. Attendees suggested allocating taller, denser buildings on opportunity sites that are located the Five Wounds Trail. Safety along the trail can improve through new development and more eyes on the streets. Special attention should be dedicated to small parcels along Santa Clara Street that are in close proximity to existing low-rise structures; new development should range from 4 to 6 floors. For larger opportunity sites, a maximum building height of 6 floors was suggested, with building massing stepping down as it approaches the existing low-rise context. Participants have identified opportunity sites that are suited for development up to 6 floors as follow: o North of Santa Clara between 21st Street and 24th Street o South of Santa Clara between 28th Street and 30th Street o South of Santa Clara between McCreery Street and King Road A discussion about building height elicited mixed responses with both a general acceptability of taller buildings near the station, whereas buildings nearer the Five Wounds Portuguese National Church should be respectful of its height. There were mixed feelings about whether or not surrounding buildings should exceed the church height. CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS Improved bike and pedestrian access on the streets is desirable. Attendees suggested the new dedicated BRT lane on Santa Clara Street could possibly be reconfigured for overall better multimodal connectivity. ART Attendees suggested City staff and private developers should work with the community to integrate communitydesired art. Page 5 of 8

DENSITY Attendees agreed on allocating the highest densities and tallest buildings in closest proximity to the Alum Rock / 28 th Street BART station. New development should be respectful of the existing architectural character and should be particularly sensitive to the Five Wounds Portuguese National Church. Attendees generally agreed with the team s proposed approach to densities and building heights tapering off from Zone 1 to Zone 4, but suggested a few sites that should accommodate greater development capacities. Attendees felt that development intensity should be sensitive to historic and lowdensity neighborhoods throughout the study area. View corridors to the church as well as natural sunlight to open space and trail should be preserved. Participants suggested the following edits to the Opportunity Sites Map: o Include underutilized parcels located between Santa Clara Street and Coyote Creek o Include the proposed Roosevelt apartment/first Community Housing located along Santa Clara and adjacent to Roosevelt Park o Include the proposed Queztal Gardens development on 1695 Alum Rock Avenue New development should accommodate as much retail and active ground floor uses as possible throughout the Study Area, while protecting light industrial uses that are not in conflict with good TOD. The city should evaluate the introduction of Production, Distribution and Repair (PDR) land use designation. DENSITY Attendees expressed a desire to see higher density development near the proposed BART Station. Attendees felt that office uses should be prioritized in Zones 1 and 2. Development around the church should complement the church and draw inspiration from its style and character Developments along the Five Wounds Trail should step down to maintain its feeling of openness. Attendees suggested big-box retail should be integrated within the taller developments, with the potential for the lowest two stories of a building to be retail. There was a stated need for grocery stores in the neighborhood. Affordable housing was stated to be a priority, focused primarily along Santa Clara Street and 28th Street. Attendees expressed a desire for a central community gathering space located wherever it makes most sense within the Station Area. Attendees felt there should be a strong focus on anti-displacement strategies for both residents and businesses. Page 6 of 8

Santa Clara Station September 13, 2018 Topics Raised/Discussed- (One Group Only) GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF GROUP DISCUSSION, ARRANGED BY GENERAL TOPIC Attendees suggested allocating taller building typologies on opportunity sites that are located between El Camino Real and the existing rail alignment. Participants expressed their concerned about high-rise residential development feasibility, as currently there is not a market for such development in the Santa Clara Station Study Area. In the downtown Santa Clara area, parcel ownership is fragmented. Although many small size parcels are adjacent to each other, assembling them into larger development sites is a challenge. New development that is sensitive to the existing low-rise context is encouraged. In this area, small parcels that are in close proximity to existing low-rise structures should be developed up to 4 floors with retail and active uses on the ground floor. Massing above podium should be set-back in order to minimize the visual impact and gradually transition to the existing context. For larger opportunity sites, a maximum building height of 6 floors is suggested, with building massing stepping down as it approaches the existing low-rise context. The community has expressed a desire for buildings no more than 4-5 stories in Downtown, but taller building may be appropriate closer the University. A similar approach was suggested along El Camino Real, west of the future Santa Clara Station, where opportunity sites are shallow and surrounded by a prevailingly single family home context. DENSITY The workshop attendees agreed with the team s proposed approach to densities and building heights tapering off from Zone 1 to Zone 4 but suggested that existing opportunities and constraints should inform a more tailored distribution of future massing. Opportunity sites located between Coleman Ave. and San José International Airport should be developed to the highest capacity allowed by the FAA height limits. An analysis of ground contamination may be necessary due to the light industrial uses that have been allocated in this area. In this area residential uses may not be compatible with the airport noise and air quality levels. Hotels serving the airport and new businesses was indicated as a compatible development for this area. In downtown Santa Clara, the community envisions an environment similar to Downtown Campbell or Downtown Mountain View, with significant ground floor retail and entertainment uses. Participants discussed shared parking to serve downtown and make small scale development more feasible; also would like to see a trolley to the BART station (also serving the University). A small boutique hotel was also proposed in the downtown area. Participants noted that on El Camino Real, shallow parcels are a major challenge for development. Strategies such as shared parking to help make development more feasible were suggested. Participants suggested that the area currently occupied by Bayfresh Greenery should be redeveloped to accommodate uses that are more compatible with the local residential character such as new work-force housing and offices. Page 7 of 8

Shared parking strategies and future adaptive reuse opportunities for parking structures should be explored, particularly in close proximity to the future Santa Clara Station and along El Camino Real, west of the future station. Attendees asked the team to edit the Carmelite Monastery in the Opportunity Sites Map. Attendees expressed the need for a holistic approach that integrates current and future planning and development efforts in and around the Station Area, including transportation, growth, and phasing. CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS Workshop participants acknowledged that accessibility is one of the main challenges of the Santa Clara Station Study Area. Visual and physical barriers such as the San José International Airport, the existing rail alignment, the Coleman Avenue/De La Cruz Blvd flyover, and street interchanges have a major impact on future development. In order to improve accessibility, a bicycle and pedestrian connection should be established between the existing Guadalupe trail and the future Santa Clara Station. Furthermore, in order to improve accessibility and overcome the impact of existing and future transit infrastructures, development over the existing rail alignment was suggested Page 8 of 8