C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

Similar documents
Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

City of Fort Lupton Administrative Site Plan Process

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

3.4 REL: Religious Use District

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

City of Fort Lupton Site Plan Process

ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

5.4 Development Incentives for All Commercial and Industrial Districts (except the TC: Town Center District).

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

MEDWAY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN PROJECTS Application Guidelines

ARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

DRIVEWAY LOCATION APPROVAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Neo-Traditional Overlay Application

GENERAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS. The following landscape provisions shall be adhered to by all land uses unless otherwise noted:

PLANNING APPROVAL & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

Bylaw A Bylaw to amend Bylaw 12800, as amended, The Edmonton Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 2239

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

3.10 ROW Overlay District

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SECTION / CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17)

Design Review Commission Report

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

Zoning OBJECTIVE: in the zoning. is to make. projects for. the Planning and. are attached ITTALS: Department

Application for Site Plan Review

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Zoning Ordinance Section 1.100

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Urban Planning and Land Use

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, RELATING TO STREET REQUIRE:MENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

DRIVEWAY REGULATIONS

Tennessee Code/TITLE 62 PROFESSIONS, BUSINESSES AND TRADES/CHAPTER 32 FIRE PROTECTION/PART 1 FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS

Landscape and fencing requirements of this Chapter shall apply to all new landscaped areas.

Town of Excelsior, Sauk County, Wisconsin DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE

Sec Development design approval and procedures.

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA STEARNS COUNTY MINNESOTA ORDIANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE

The Town Board of the Town of Vienna, County of Dane, State of Wisconsin, does ordain and adopt as follows.

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Town of Bridgton FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY ORDINANCE

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

Site Plan Review Residential Accessory Building

CITY OF GARDEN CITY. Garden City Design Review Committee Staff Contact: Chris Samples STAFF REPORT: DSRFY Page 1

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:

Effective date of most recently amended section of Article III Chapter 7: 07/24/13. Copyrighted by the City of New York

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

S I T E P L A N A N D A R C H I T E C T U R A L R E V I E W A P P L I C A T O I N

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

Chapter RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES

SUBDIVISION, REZONING, PLANNING APPROVAL, PUD & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: May 3, 2007

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

SPRINKLER ORDINANCE Town of Yarmouth, Maine Recodified: 1/15/98 Amended: 4/19/01 Amended: 6/18/15

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Net Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= sq. ft. a) Credited Street Area (total adjacent frontage) x ½ width of public rightof-way

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Landscaping Standards

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report Executive Summary

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

Transcription:

C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that are out of character with existing development, or, if specific neighborhood plans and regulations are adopted, insure that projects are consistent with those plans and regulations. B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by: 1. Keeping mechanical structures and other utility features out of main view as much as possible; 2. Reducing unnecessary signage; 3. Minimizing curb cuts; 4. Improving the space for pedestrians; C. Enhance parking area appearances. (Note: Parking areas are covered in the above process when part of an overall project involving building work. They are not covered when providing parking is the sole work being done. Parking lots, as uses in and of themselves, are covered in the applicable instances by the Special Permit process, as specific issue development rather than as general projects. In Business, Commercial, and Industrial Districts under present regulations parking lots are permitted without any zoning review.) D. Preserve historic and architecturally significant features. II. Affected Projects (commercial buildings only, does not include one- to four family dwellings) A. All new construction. B. All additions to existing buildings which face the street, that exceed twenty-five percent of the ground level space (total square feet of the footprint of the building). C. All exterior renovations facing a street and/or reorientation of existing buildings. D. All off-premises advertising. E. Demolition of buildings reclamation of sites. F. Projects (other than demolitions) on properties: 1. Identified by the City as Architecturally Significant, or 2. By the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (SHPO) as: a. Located in a National Register District, b. Individually listed in the Nation Register, or c. Eligible for inclusion in the National Register.

C-I-10 III. Exempt Projects Covered by Other Provisions A. Preservation Board cases pursuant to Part C, section VII, articles 1-9 of the City of Syracuse Zoning Rules and Regulations (Certificates of Appropriateness and demolitions on historically significant properties). B. Planned Institutional District projects. C. Planned Development District projects. D. Hazardous Conditions: Any building(s) or structure(s), which have been determined by the Director of the Division of Code Enforcement and/or Chief of Fire to constitute an immediate danger or hazard to public health, safety, or welfare. E. Special Permit cases. F. Super Projects: These are large-scale projects that exceed the scope of considerations intended by the Project Site Review. Their size makes the context of the surrounding properties immaterial to the consideration of project design. Their involvement in general with other types of review makes the considerations of the Project Design Review redundant. A Super Project shall be exempted when documentation is submitted to the Zoning Administrator that each of following three sets of criteria apply: 1. A) Project size of at least thirty (30) contiguous acres held in common interest (contiguity includes land directly across streets), B) involvement under a single development entity of at least three (3) contiguous city blocks, or C) project worth of over ten million dollars; 2. Approvals are required for government funding or economic incentives (including PILOT agreements); 3. Approvals are required for A) street abandonment or dedication, B) land subdivision or resubdivision, C) use of public land, or D) exercise of eminent domain. Modifications to Super projects are also exempted. The Zoning Administrator shall provide acknowledgment of the exemption to a developer of a Super Project within a reasonable time of a receiving a request for such documentation. IV. Application Requirements A. Completed application form. B. SEQR form. C. Supplemental material. 1. For new construction, additions, and renovations: a. Site plan (see V. below for details) b. Stamped survey. 2

C-I-10 c. Architectural drawings to scale, depicting floor plans, section views, exterior elevations, architectural design of building including proposed and existing materials, textures and colors. d. 35 mm or digital Photographs of the existing structure or project site. e. Photographs of existing streetscape (Must include one photograph of each adjacent property and properties directly across the street). f. Other information or details as may be reasonably required. 2. For demolitions: Post demolition plans must be submitted pursuant to SEQR (617.3g) a. Stamped survey b. One 35 mm or digital photograph of the site. c. Photographs of each adjacent property to project site. d. Photos of the properties across the street from the intended demolition. e. Key map for photos or other illustration of building locations drawn to scale. f. Post demolition plans or reclamation plans 3. For re-orientations of existing buildings a. Site Plan b. Floor Plans c. Photos of existing building and areas of reorientation d. Elevations illustrating areas of reorientation D. Fees (pursuant to fee schedules adopted by the Common Council) V. Site Plan Components (as prepared by a New York State licensed architect, engineer, or landscape architect) A. All existing easements and/or restrictions of record, including rights-of-way, fully dimensioned. B. All existing and proposed utilities both public and/or private. C. All existing and proposed buildings or structures and mature trees. D. All watercourses, marshes, rock outcroppings, wooded areas, wetlands (DEC or Corps of Engineers) floodplains, (based on FEMA maps) and other significant natural or manmade features. E. Topographic information (spot elevations for areas less than 2% slope and two-foot contours for slopes greater than 2%). F. Proposed land use. G. All driveways, parking lots, curbing, loading spaces, and driving lanes (existing and proposed). H. All proposed landscaping, plantings, screening devices and exterior lighting. I. All proposed signage. J. Existing and proposed fire hydrants and fire suppression connections. K. Detailed drainage plans showing on-site storage, floodways, and proposed easements, including siltation and erosion controls plans. L. Proposed grading. VI. Stages of Review A. Preparation of the project plan (including consultation with appropriate city staff for applicable requirements). 3

C-I-10 B. Preliminary review of project plan by the Division of Code Enforcement to identify any major building code inconsistencies and any drainage or other construction issues. C. Submission of application to the Zoning Office following review for New York State building code compliance. D. Review of application for completeness and (if not done earlier) identification of other approvals that may be required. E. Preliminary evaluation of SEQR. F. Referral of application to other bodies as required (responses required within 30 days): 1. Onondaga County Planning Board for projects within 500 feet of a State or County road. 2. Syracuse Landmark Preservation Board for recommendation on II. F. properties (historic and architecturally significant sites) G. Analysis: DETERMINED BY SEPARATE POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS FORM (ATTACHMENT A) TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF. 1. Identification of the significant features of surrounding area (the context). 2. Identification of relevant adopted plans and any specially adopted criteria, if applicable, that must be met. 3. Point by point comparison of proposed project against the identified salient contextual features or, if applicable, the specifically required adopted design criteria. H. Compilation of the point by point report by the Zoning Office (or other duly designated staff) based upon the determinations of the above analysis. I. Provision of the point by point report to applicant by the Zoning Office (or other duly designated staff). J. Receipt of applicable recommendations (including review of project by the Syracuse Landmark Preservation Board for historically and architecturally significant properties, or Onondaga County Planning Board). K. Response by the applicant to the point by point report (and to recommendations if any) in one of the following ways: 1. Acceptance of or consent to the report to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator for decision. 2. Withdrawal of the application for revision and re-submission of a revised application at a later date. 3. Written Disagreement with all or some of the points in the report (stops the decision clock ) and employment of an architectural consultant of the applicant s choosing to compose a rebuttal to the report. a. Rebuttal to be submitted to staff within 30 days of report date. b. Forwarding of the report, application, and rebuttal to Planning Commission for Decision. 4

C-I-10 c. Election by Planning Commission to call upon consultant (on retainer) for review of application, plans, report and rebuttal - consultant to provide Planning Commission with interpretation and recommendation. L. Scheduling of Public Hearings at the optional discretion of the Zoning Administrator and the City Planning Commission in their respective reviews unless otherwise stated in the City of Syracuse Zoning Rules and Regulations. M. Decisions in one of the following manners: 1. Approval of application as submitted. 2. Approval with Conditions. 3. Denial A majority plus one vote shall be required to override recommendation of Syracuse Landmark Preservation Board and/or Onondaga County Planning Board. In the case of review by the Zoning Administrator matters that would involve an override shall be forwarded to the City Planning Commission, a body made up of more than one individual. Decisions shall be made in resolution form. Original resolution shall stay in the office file, a copy shall be filed with the City Clerk, and a copy shall be provided to applicant, the Division of Code Enforcement, Permit Office, and any other pertinent involved party. N. Appeals from determinations of the Zoning Administrator shall be made to the City Planning Commission. Appeals from the Planning Commission, if chosen, shall be made to the Supreme Court pursuant to Article 78 of the NYCCR. VII. Waivers The Syracuse Planning Commission shall have the authority to grant waivers of area, number, or design requirements for properties subject to the Project Site Review regulations set forth in this article. In approving any Waiver the Commission must find that practical difficulties would occur with respect to the economic and functional utilization of the property under consideration and that reasonable alternatives otherwise permitted do not exist. Practical difficulties affecting the property under consideration must be weighed against the impact the Waiver would have on the character of the surrounding area. All Waiver requests shall be subject to duly noticed public hearings. VIII. Coordination with Other Boards and Procedures A. Special Permit Uses 1. Project Site Review not necessary. 2. The required Special Permit reviews include all of the same materials that would accompany Project Plan review applications and approximate the same point by point analysis as involved with the project plans. B. Board of Zoning Appeals 1. Where Project Site Reviews are involved the Board of Zoning Appeals shall consider only use variances. 5

C-I-10 2. Where Project Site Reviews are involved the Syracuse Planning Commission shall consider as waivers those requests that would otherwise be considered as variances of residential density requirements or required amounts of parking. 3. Subject to findings under State Law, the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant requested use variances, to be preliminary to required review of the project plan by the Syracuse Planning Commission. 4. The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have no authority to waive the requirements for Project Site Review, nor shall it grant waivers as reserved for review by the Syracuse Planning Commission. 5. The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have no authority to review appeals from the Zoning Administrator or the Syracuse Planning Commission with respect to Project Site Review. C. Inner Harbor District 1. All Lakefront Design Review Board matters shall be transferred to the Syracuse Planning Commission. 2. The Lakefront Design Review Board shall cease to exist. D. James Street Overlay District 1. All Eastwood Design Review Board matters shall be transferred to the Syracuse Planning Commission. 2. Those Special Permit requirements under Local Business A District provisions, which had been eliminated by the adoption of the James Street Overlay District, shall be restored as matters falling to the City Planning Commission. 3. The Eastwood Design Review Board shall cease to exist. E. Ministerial Construction Review Final detailed review of construction plans for major projects preceding issuance of permits shall follow the Project Site Review approval process outlined above. Adopted 9/22/03 6

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major STREETS AND PUBLIC ROWS Street Width(s) Street Type(s) (arterial, collector, local) LOT CONFIGURATIONS Lot Area(s) (sq. ft.) Lot Frontage(s) (in ft.) BUILDING PLACEMENT AND MASS Building Setbacks Building Heights Building Spacing Orientation of Facades (back/ front/side)

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major TERRAIN Slope Water Features LAND USES Types and Mix of Uses VISIBLE MECHANICAL FEATURES, UTILITIES, AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Street Lighting Private Lighting Utility Poles and Service Boxes Telephones and Vending Devices Building Mechanicals Public Shelters 2

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major Accessory Structures Trash Containers ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Architectural Styles Roof Lines and Types Fenestration and Building Entries Canopies and Marquees Building Materials Colors and Textures PARKING, DRIVEWAYS, AND LOADING On-Street Parking (type and capacity) 3

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major Curb Cuts (ingress/egress) Off-Street Parking Size and Placement Surface Types Screening Features Softening Parking Area Expanses Loading Facilities (type and visibility) OPEN SPACES Public Gathering Areas Sidewalks and Paths (type and location) Bicycle Paths and Accommodations Public Landscaping 4

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major Private Landscaping (trees, grass, other Plantings) Enclosures (walls, fences, etc.) Street Furniture SIGNS Freestanding Businesses Identification Signs Wall, Roof, and Projecting Signs Billboards Kiosks Street Signs And Other Public Signs DEMOLITIONS (POST DEMO PLANS) Grading New Construction 5

Case No. Address Property No. POINT BY POINT ANALYSIS PROPOSED SURROUNDING ADOPTED DEVIATION COMPONENT PROJECT AREA PLAN <1-2-3-4-5> REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT (if applicable) TO AREA OR ADOPTED PLAN*) 1=No Deviation 5=Major Other In-Fill Compatibility with Existing Streetscape *NOTES: The analysis consists of comparing each component of the project with the components of the street or area in which the project exists. Note is to be made of the average or typical nature of each component in the surroundings and the range of the variations in that component. The comparison with the existing surroundings is superseded when specific requirements have been adopted on a city-wide scale or when specific requirements are established as part of adopted neighborhood or corridor plans. With new construction most of the components in this table will need to be examined. With additions, renovations, and demolitions many of the components may not be applicable 6