Agenda. Where we are in the MHP process/regulatory review MHP components Proposed MHP Next steps

Similar documents
Draft Downtown Waterfront Municipal Harbor Plan

2017 Downtown Waterfront District Municipal Harbor Plan & Public Realm Activation Plan Supplement - February 16, 2018

Downtown Waterfront Municipal Harbor Plan Advisory Committee

Lynn Waterfront Master Plan

Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan

Charlestown Waterfront Assessment: Creating Connections

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT DISTRICT MUNICIPAL HARBOR PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Boston Redevelopment Authority. Boston s s Planning and Economic Development Agency

DRAFT DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT DISTRICT MUNICIPAL HARBOR PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hamilton Pier 7&8 Draft Urban Design Plan

Rose Kennedy Greenway Ramp Parcels Study

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

Cohasset Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting #1. Harriman GEI Consultants FXM Associates May 31, 2018

Downtown Waterfront District Municipal Harbor Plan & Public Realm Activation Plan

Subject: Intercontinental Hotel Boston (500 Atlantic Ave) Ch. 91 License # 9825

Waterfront Activation Plan for the Charlestown Navy Yard Public Meeting

Agenda. Presentation (30 minutes) Overview of RIV District Next Steps / Calendar Display Stations. Display Station Discussion

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee May 17, 2016

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

FORT POINT DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT MUNICIPAL HARBOR

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

Request for Proposals

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

County Board Meeting October 20, Request to Advertise Draft Area Plan

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

Steering Committee Meeting

DESIGN WORKSHOP. November 17, 2015

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

OTHERS Alex Jaegerman, Director of Planning & Development Wendy L. Simmons, Administrative Assistant, Recording Secretary

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Future Proposed Development

Town of Liberty, NY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING UPDATES

Getting and Giving the Most

McINTYRE PROJECT February 26, 2018

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Hudson Group North America LLC

Community Task Force Meeting June 19, Planned Development 500 Huntington WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

City of Everett Department of Planning and Development 484 Broadway, Room 25 Everett, Massachusetts (P) (F)

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Coronation Park Neighbourhood Plan. Open House #2 15 September 2016

East Central Area Plan

Community Meeting #2.1

Waterfront West December 6, 2016

Taming the Bus: Strategies for Urbanizing Suburban Transit. Seth Riseman, Utile, Inc. Architecture + Planning

Neighbourhood Planning Network

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

South Waterfront Greenway Design Guidelines. North Macadam Urban Renewal Advisory Committee April 10, 2008

NEW HOMES IN ANCASTER S MATURE NEIGHBOURHOODS WHAT WE HAVE HEARD

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

CHEROKEE STREET CORRIDOR GATEWAY

NORTH END/WATERFRONT RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION

30 and 44 Zorra Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group

LYNN WATERFRONT MHP Request for Notice to Proceed Proposed Planning Program

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Fisherman s Wharf Public Realm Plan

Urban Design Expert Evidence Leanne Hodyl

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

WELCOME and introduction

Land Use Policy & Development Ordinance Update

PUBLIC EIR SCOPING MEETING

SCTPO Project Summary September 2014

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3

Quarterly Report & Code Evaluation

Downtown Waterfront Municipal Harbor Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Atlantic Wharf, 290 Congress Street

New Auburn Village Center Study Auburn, Maine

10 Park Lawn Rd - Zoning Amendment Application- Preliminary Report

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Stuart Street Planning Study Development Review Guidelines to supplement Back Bay Downtown IPOD (1987) October 15, Preface

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

SECTION E. Realizing the Plan

Fisherman s Wharf Residential and R&D RAFT. Town of Jupiter Planning and Zoning Commission March 14, 2017

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

Gibsons Foreshore & Seawalk Improvements

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Planning Commission March 14, Presented by: City of Bellingham Port of Bellingham

Northern Territory Compact Urban Growth Policy

Transcription:

1

Agenda Where we are in the MHP process/regulatory review MHP components Proposed MHP Next steps for the Boston Redevelopment Authority MHPAC Meeting 2

Where we are in the MHP process The BRA and its consultant team are preparing a draft MHP Draft MHP structure taking shape with key elements Includes new material to present on an area-wide plan More work needed on - substitute provisions for significant projects - offsets - access to existing water dependent uses We are seeking MHPAC input on this proposed approach Based on feedback and additional analyses, we will complete a draft MHP for further review and submit it to the State The State process includes: Public hearing and comment period (30 days) Consultation period (30-60 days) Secretary issues an MHP decision 3

Downtown Waterfront MHP Regulatory review 4

Downtown Waterfront MHP Regulatory review Municipal Harbor Plan Height Density -Built Floor Area & Built Volume Shadow Impacts (in Planning Area) Building Footprint / Open Space Percentage Setbacks Water Dependent Use Zone Facilities of Public Accommodation with Ground floor uses Facilities of Private Tenancy over tidelands Ground Floor Uses (general) 5

Downtown Waterfront MHP Regulatory review Article 80 Urban Design Environmental Impacts -Shadows & Wind Traffic Impacts -Counts, Parking, Access Architectural Quality/ Aesthetics Open Space Details Ground Floor Uses (specific) Municipal Harbor Plan Height Density -Built Floor Area & Built Volume Shadow Impacts (in Planning Area) Building Footprint / Open Space Percentage Setbacks Water Dependent Use Zone Facilities of Public Accommodation with Ground floor uses Facilities of Private Tenancy over tidelands Ground Floor Uses (general) 6

Downtown Waterfront MHP MHP components: this MHP has many objectives Activate the waterfront Preserve existing and encourage future water dependent uses Expand view corridors & improve open space Provide higher-density development in some areas, retain lower density in others Expand water transportation Restrict net new shadow on key public areas Encourage coastal resiliency Comment cards from visioning charrettes, March 2013 7

Downtown Waterfront MHP MHP components: examples of public feedback include Climate change & coastal resiliency Protect existing water dependent uses Size and type of proposed developments Plan on an area-wide basis Avoid setting unintended precedents Concerns about traffic Provide predictable, timely offsets 8

Downtown Waterfront MHP Proposed MHP: formulation This proposed MHP is based on Prior MHPs and new approaches Broad use of amplifications Substitute provisions and offsets, with exceptions - Building Footprint - Building Height - FPTs over flowed tidelands - Water Dependent Use Zones 9

Downtown Waterfront MHP Proposed MHP: prior MHPs Prior MHPs provide guidance & precedents but are not always applicable to the Downtown Waterfront - South Boston MHP: virtually no existing development, a clean slate - Fort Point Downtown (I & II) and Lovejoy Wharf: focus on a single parcel - Downtown Waterfront: wide variety of existing structures, owners, and proposed developments Top: South Boston (c. 2013); Bottom: Lovejoy Wharf 10

Downtown Waterfront MHP Proposed MHP: new approaches New approaches are based on regulations and guidance from CZM & DEP, including - Open space is open to the sky - In general, a taller building with a smaller footprint is better than a shorter building with a larger footprint (same volume) o Preserve capacity for water dependent use - Focus on predictable outcomes - MHP must protect access to existing water dependent uses 11

Downtown Waterfront MHP Proposed MHP: new approaches To reflect the unique characteristics of the Downtown Waterfront, new approaches provide - Significant amplifications - Protections for existing/future water dependent uses (baseline requirement) - Area-wide substitute provisions, with exceptions - Combined open space, with a focus on approval standards for offsets - Restrictions on net new shadow - Tiered offsets, based on impacts 12

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Amplifications Amplifications tailor Chapter 91 discretionary provisions, while substitute provisions are for dimensional standards Apply Commonwealth tidelands standards to the entire planning area - Ground floor FPAs - public restrooms - wayfinding & art - water transportation Designate the New England Aquarium as a prime SPDF 13

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Amplifications Structures over flowed tidelands, regardless of use, shall provide offsets as if an FPT 14

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Area-wide substitute provision & offsets, with exceptions Area-wide substitute provision, with exceptions to avoid precedents - Area-wide substitute provision retains character of the planning area o o Based on RK Greenway guidelines for height Increases open space for new projects - Exceptions allow for higher density with greater public benefits 15

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Existing Open Space Area-wide combined open space meets Chapter 91 standard (1 SF of open space for 1 SF of building footprint) Offsets for individual parcels based on MHP approval standards to improve existing open space 16

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Existing Open Space 51% public open space 39% building footprint 12% private open space Without private open space, area has approx. 56% open space and 44% building footprint 17

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Building footprint substitute provision Area-wide maximum new building footprint of 70% lot coverage Exceptions - Possibly Harbor Garage and/or Marriott Long Wharf 18

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Building footprint offset Area-wide offset based on building footprint lot coverage - $xx per SF for building footprint of 51 60% lot coverage - $xx + $yy per SF for building footprint of 61 70% lot coverage Exceptions - $xx + $yy + $zz for any potential building footprint in excess of 70% lot coverage All offsets to be used for public open space improvements, based on minimum expenditures 19

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Building height substitute provision Area-wide building height 200 maximum Must meet Boston wind standards Exceptions - Existing buildings: an additional 30 feet only, no more than 2 floors o Must move mechanicals to upper floors o All open space public and ground floor FPAs - Long Wharf, seaward of the Marriott: max. additional 30 / 2 floors - Hook Wharf - Harbor Garage 20

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Building height offsets Area-wide offset based on net new shadow (NNS) - $X per square foot of NNS for implementation of the Public Realm Plan and for water transportation - No NNS on Long Wharf seaward of the Marriott Area not under continuous 1 hour Shadow shadow on on Long 23 rd Oct Wharf, October 23 21

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Building height offsets Exceptions - Hook Wharf o o $x per square foot of NNS for building height up to 200 for implementation of the Public Realm Plan and for water transportation $x + $y per square foot of NNS for building height above 200 for implementation of the Public Realm Plan and for water transportation - Harbor Garage o Same as above, except offsets may be substituted for new or existing SPDFs 22

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP FPTs over flowed tidelands, substitute provision and offset No area-wide substitute provision or offset Exception - Hook Wharf, for residential development on upper floors over flowed tidelands Offset - On-site public benefits - Offsets must be provided regardless of use (amplification) 23

Downtown Waterfront MHP: Proposed MHP Water dependent use zone (WDUZ), substitute provision WDUZ may be reconfigured to provide the same or greater area as a compliant WDUZ Some limitations on the seaward extent of seasonal uses, such as outdoor cafés No offset required 24

Downtown Waterfront Next Steps Discuss and comment on proposed MHP framework Present baseline requirements for water dependent uses Present substitute provisions & offsets for Marriott Long Wharf, Harbor Garage, and Hook Wharf Finalize draft MHP with additional information and schematics for comment 25

Downtown Waterfront Next Meeting Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3-5 pm 26

for the Boston Redevelopment Authority MHPAC Meeting 27