TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

Similar documents
Community Design Plan

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

REZONING POLICY FOR CHINATOWN SOUTH (HA-1A) Adopted by City Council on April 19, April 2011

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

What Pioneer Grove Will Look Like?

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Independence Boulevard Area Plan Planning Committee Public Comment May 18, 2010

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis September 17, 2018

Retail Signage Options. Planning Commission Special Meeting February 19, 2015

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

SITE PLAN AREA. Met Park 6 Site Area (122,368 sf) Met Park 4/5 The Bartlett. Met Park 3 The Acadia. Met Park 2 The Millennium.

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Gateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN. CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE CENTRE. airdrie, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 2012

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

Community Task Force Meeting June 19, Planned Development 500 Huntington WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

Zoning Code Issues Prioritization

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Development Agreement Public Meeting. June 26, 2013

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

Design Guidelines. Gardnerville Plan for Prosperity

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS VAN NUYS NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, PLUM COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING, CITY OF LOS ANGELES

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

6 CATHEDRAL COMMUNITY SECONDARY PLAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 123 TOWN OF MARKHAM

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview May 25, 2010

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Public Meeting March 10 th 2011

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS

Micco Park Village Development

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

South fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Urban Planning and Land Use

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

June 21, North. Spring Angeles. On behalf. other large. of new, high-rise. distinctive

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Official Plan Review

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

CITY OF DUPONT LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECTS 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CYCLE

Staff Report and Recommendation

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

Village Center Zoning. Town of Sutton, MA June 15, 2016

HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview March 10, 2011

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Franklin/Myrtle School Small Area Plan Adopted February 18, 2003

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GLEN COVE

Transcription:

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 7-6-15

CONTEXT MAP

PREVIOUS CHURCH AND ADJACENT RETAIL SITE EXISTING RETAIL CENTER SITE CONDITIONS PREVIOUS SITE CONDITIONS

PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT MONARCH VILLAGE - 201 UNITS (70 DU/PA) PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SENIOR/ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT

MONARCH VILLAGE Senior Project Monarch Village Senior project Planning Commission and City Council approved 201 Units in 2008 and renewed the approvals in 2011. Project was on 2.88 acres with 201 units (70 DU/AC) General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Design Review and Conditional Use Permit Developer withdrew project based on the Senior Project not being financially feasible after the economic recession of 2009.

EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOS

EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOS

EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOS

EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOS

PROPOSED PROJECT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Guiding Principles Consistency with General plan Goals and Policies Activate the street with new retail/commercial uses and live-work units Consistency with Overall Strategies in City Council adopted Neighborhoods of Town Center Provide development standards in the Zoning Text change which promote and preserve the residential character of the neighborhood here and in other parts of the City, and provide positive economic growth. Develop a new Mixed-use product to the City of Tustin and provide new Class A market rate housing to a very underserved area.

PROPOSED PROJECT OBJECTIVES Project Objectives Provide significant economic development in an underperforming area of the City. Provide a new Entry to Old Town which promotes a positive image for the City of Tustin and provides new economic growth in the neighborhood. Expand streetscape improvements along street corridors. Provide architectural design features and character which is compatible with the existing neighborhood. Develop a new Mixed-use product to the City of Tustin and provide new Class A market rate housing to a very underserved area.

PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Market rate apartment project Property Owner is desirous of developing non-senior project on subject site. (201 UNITS (60 DU/PA) Owner has been working with staff since early 2014 and have responded to many requests including: Increase size of the site by acquisition of adjacent office building at San Juan St. and Red Hill. Include commercial uses in the project (mixed-use) with retail and livework units. Widening of Red Hill with landscape improvements, addition of traffic signal on Red Hill, utility improvements, street improvements. Architectural design modifications Traffic study, sound report, Tract Map, WQMP, and preliminary environmental scope.

PROPOSED PROJECT Project features and architectural elements respond to Project Objectives New mixed-use residential/commercial development in a wrap type product with parking structure 10,000 s.f. of retail and commercial uses with leasing office and fitness center all with commercial store fronts, signage, architectural elements and street furniture. Ground floor Live-work town home units Activates the street and reinforces the pedestrian activity Corner identification and architectural elements. Provides maximum economic benefit to the neighborhood Mixed-use project has less impact on the environment, neighborhood and traffic than other Commercial Uses currently allowed by Zoning.

PLANNING & ZONING INFORMATION Revised submittal is expected to include the following: Retain PC-C GP Land Use Designation on Original Site since residential development already permitted Re-designate additional property added to site from CC to PC-C Land Use Element Textural Amendments to clarify mixed use as permitted, density stds. and locational criteria Rezone both parcels to Planned Community (PC) for consistency with Land Use Designation of PC-C Zoning Textural Amendments to the PC Zone to clarify mixed use as permitted by CUP and to add development stds. CUP Application for 201 unit residential mixed use project

PROPOSED PROJECT - A PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR SITE PLAN

VIEW FROM SAN JUAN AND RED HILL Proposed Project - A

VIEW FROM SAN JUAN AND RED HILL

VIEW FROM RED HILL LOOKING NORTH

THE NEIGHBORHOODS OF TUSTIN TOWN CENTER - A NEW BEGINNING Objectives: Increase the supply of housing Enrich the livability of neighborhoods Revitalize commercial uses Upgrade the appearance of street corridors and community gateways Create employment opportunities

THE NEIGHBORHOODS OF TUSTIN TOWN CENTER - A NEW BEGINNING Overall Strategies from the goals in the Guide Convert underperforming commercial sites to other uses or mixed uses. Encourage introduction of moderate to high-density residential development along street corridors, compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. Encourage construction of a greater variety of residential product types to accommodate a variety of family sizes and price points. Consolidate commercial uses along corridors into welldefined neighborhood centers and/or mixed use developments. Expand streetscape improvements along street corridors.

SITE DESIGN FROM NEW BEGINNINGS Mixed-Use buildings should have ground floor retail and no setbacks to define the street and encourage pedestrian activity. Landmark buildings should have a higher building element such as a tower to increase visibility, provide orientation, or form a gateway.

SITE DESIGN FROM NEW BEGINNINGS Mixed-use buildings should front the street with large storefront windows for ground floor retail uses Buildings should be modulated with architectural elements, recesses, overhangs, and special corner treatments. Entrances should be easily identifiable. Signage should be well-designed and integrated in the facade.

ALTERNATE PRODUCTS DENSITIES EXAMINED Applicant has looked at several alternate projects: A. Proposed project with 201 units 60 DU/AC Mixed-use with commercial and retail on the ground floor Wrap project type with parking structure 3 and 4 stories with live work townhomes and retail on the ground floor B. Alternate project with 169 units 50 DU/AC Mixed-use with commercial and retail on the ground floor Wrap product type with parking structure 3 and 4 stories with live work and retail on the ground floor C. Alternate project with 135 units 40 DU/AC No mixed-use or commercial uses on the ground floor, or pedestrian oriented. All on-grade parking, no parking structure. Four stories over one level of parking on grade Parking on the ground floor no retail or live-work. Provides no activation of the street or commercial retail

ALTERNATE STUDY PROJECT B 169 UNITS (50 DU/AC) ALTERNATE STUDY GROUND FLOOR

ALTERNATE STUDY B 169 UNITS (50 DU/AC) ALTERNATE STUDY UPPER FLOOR

ALTERNATE STUDY C 135 UNITS (40 DU/AC ALTERNATE STUDY No retail, or Live work

ALTERNATE PRODUCT ANALYSIS ALTERNATE(PRODUCTS Alternate(Product Product(Description Achieve( Applicible( GP(Policies( Consistency( with(town( Center(Study Ecomonic( Feasibllity Comments Proposed(Development(>(A Wrap(product(>(60(DU/AC Y Y Y Achieves(all(of(the(objectives(and(is(the(optimal(density(for(Wrap(product 201(Units Alternate(Study(Project(>(B Wrap(product(>(50(DU/AC Y Y N ((Achieves(all(of(the(objectives(except(eccomomic(feasiblity 169(Units Alternate(Study(Project(>(C Parking(0n(grade(>(40(DU/AC N N N No(Mixed>use,(or(pedestrian(friendly,(and(is(not(ecconomically(feasible 135(Units Alternate(Study(Project(>(D Garden(apartments(>(25(DU/AC N N N No(Mixed>use,(or(pedestrian(friendly,(and(is(not(ecconomically(feasible 72(units

POLICY DIRECTION AND NEXT STEPS Provide policy to the Applicant and City Staff supporting the applicant s submittal of a revised application for a 60 DU/AC project Given the time frame applicant has been working with staff, we request expeditious and timely processing of revised application Applicant would revise and complete application and any required environmental documentation