PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION AGENDA. City Hall Second Floor Conference Room 9027 Center Street. July 1, :30 PM

Similar documents
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Silverdale Regional Center

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Status Report: MD 355 Project

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Guiding Principles, Objectives, Strategies and Policies

4. Shape Transitions. 4. Shape Transitions

West Ocala Vision & Community Plan City Council Work Session. Presented by West Ocala Community Plan Steering Committee

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

1. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Information Session July 25, 2018

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Urban Planning and Land Use

III. Design Principles

East Central Area Plan

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

WELCOME and introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

Corridors. Re-vitalize our Corridors and Gateways

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

Bethesda Downtown Plan

and services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

DRAFT City of Titusville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements April 16, 2018

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

The transportation system in a community is an

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 305, 309, & 315 SOUTHDALE ROAD WEST LONDON ONTARIO

Special Joint Meeting. Emerald Isle Planning Board. Emerald Isle Board of Commissioners. January 18, 2017

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND APPENDICES

POCKET COMMUNITY PLAN

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Strategic Growth Area #1 Northampton Boulevard Corridor Area

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

McCowan Precinct Plan Study Background & Deliverables

Planning Board Briefing

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

9 th Street Sub Area Plan

Transit Oriented Development. Overview

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Mill Conversion Overlay District Zoning Bylaw Amendment

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Transcription:

MEMBERS Harry J. Clark, Chairperson Bruce Wood, Vice-Chairperson Russell Harrison Ken Johnson Robert W. Schilpp Martha Wilson PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION AGENDA City Hall Second Floor Conference Room 9027 Center Street July 1, 2015 7:30 PM 1. Roll Call and Determination of a Quorum 2. New Business: Zoning Ordinance Update ZTA #2015-01, Parking and Loading Requirements 3. Other Business 4. Adjournment

6/26/2015 Zoning Ordinance & DCSM Amendments Planning Commission Work Session July 1, 2015 Presentation Overview Introduction and Goals Guiding Thoughts Best Practices Review Manassas Parking Challenges Benefits of a Good Parking Ordinance New Concepts Group Discussion 1

6/26/2015 Introduction and Goals Implement Manassas Next The 2032 Comprehensive Plan and the Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail System Master Plan Evaluate and implement best practices. Incorporate clear development standards. Organize the section in a logical and user-friendly manner. Guiding Thoughts The changes to be proposed will be based on best practices research and recommendations, but ultimately they are for your community and should reflect Manassas values. Communities handle parking in unique ways and there is wide variability among some standards. There are no right or wrong standards in that regard, but there are uses that may be under or over-parked. What is right for Manassas? 2

6/26/2015 Best Practices Review ITE research, studies, and critiques (4th Generation) APA studies and research for comparable localities (APA Parking Generation) Two Virginia leaders in parking (recent amendments and research) City of Norfolk City of Virginia Beach City of Manassas Park Manassas Challenges Utilization disparity in distribution (underutilization or deficits) How can the same use be treated fairly in different areas? What is the best way forward to provide downtown parking? How can multi-modal transportation be better encouraged? Confusing and outdated regulations more clear and relevant regulations are needed User-friendly Efficient Environmentally responsible 3

6/26/2015 Benefits of Good Parking Regs Incorporate clear standards User-friendly Efficient development Environment friendly Incorporate Clear Standards One Size does NOT Fit All! Why are there parking standards? These requirements are intended to ensure an efficient transportation and parking system by establishing standards for off-street parking and commercial loading areas. What is working well? What are the largest issues? Are there any loading issues? 4

6/26/2015 User-friendly Ensure the section flows logically. Separate some uses that don t make sense (e.g., warehousing and storage from manufacturing, or child care center from schools) Include alternative transportation standards Bicycle parking Bicycle racks Other amenities Use illustrations if they demonstrate a standard Efficient Development No parking can deter market leases Too much parking is cost prohibitive Too much parking is wasted space Rarely will businesses want too little parking Parking needs differ depending on the area 5

6/26/2015 Environmentally Friendly New stormwater regulations Compliance measures require alterations/reductions Amending zoning requirements is an effective BMP Reduces impervious surface Decreases run-off and TMDL numbers Reduces the heat island effect Alternative transportation standards Reduce emissions Increase health and recreation Multi-use transportation system is a less congested, more community-oriented approach New Concepts Regulate parking according to Character Area as appropriate Offer a payment in lieu option for downtown parking to more equitably finance a future parking structure Place more technical requirements in the DCSM 6

6/26/2015 Character Areas TABLE 6.1 TABLE OF MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL DISTRICTS LAND USES DU = Dwelling Unit LU = Lodging Unit BDRM = Bedroom SF = Building s Square Feet DOWNTOWN MANASSAS LANDING / MATHIS AVE SUBURBAN / TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOODS / ALL OTHER AREAS EXCEPTIONS/COMMENTS ALL LAND USES RESIDENTIAL USES (except as listed below) 2 per DU (1 per DU for adaptive reuse of existing buildings) 2 per DU (1 per DU for adaptive reuse of existing buildings) 2 per DU Lots < 40 in width require Zoning Administrator determination Duplex or Single Family Attached 2 per DU 2.5 per DU 2.5 per DU Multi-Family 1.5 per DU 1.6 per DU 1.75 per DU Group Home 1 plus resident spaces 1 plus resident spaces 1 plus resident spaces DCSM TABLE 6.4 TABLE OF OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS LAND USES GROSS FLOOR AREA (square feet)** NO. AND SIZE OF LOADING AREAS* RESIDENTIAL USES (only those listed below) Nursing Home, and Continuing Care Retirement Community COMMERCIAL USES (except those listed below) 10,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 10,000-25,000 25-000 40,000 40,000 100,000 Each additional 200,000 1 Short 1 Short 2 Short 2 Long 3 Long 1 Long Retail or Wholesale Establishment 5,000 10,000 1 Short Hospital, Educational Facility Hotel 10,000 100,000 Each additional 100,000 10,000 100,000 each additional 100,000 1 Short 1 Short 1 Short 1 Short 7

6/26/2015 Payment in Lieu Premise: Continue planning for additional City-owned parking Parking minimums, with appropriate in-lieu contributions if parking is not provided Potential funding mechanisms General fund Special tax district Developer contributions Parking fees Public-private partnerships Facilitated by: Matt Arcieri, AICP Darren Coffey, AICP darren@bgllc.net 8

Manassas Next 2032 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 2: Community Overview, Vision and Plan Framework, p. 2-5 Parking in downtown Manassas should be managed to serve downtown businesses, residents, government services, and commuters using the train station, ensuring that the supply of parking adequately meets the needs of the users. While the automobile will continue to be the primary source of transportation for years to come, the City can make strides to offer improved transportation alternatives that will help to maintain road capacity, decrease demand for new parking, improve the pedestrian realm of the City, and create opportunities for healthy lifestyles, such as walking and biking. Chapter 3: Land Use, Suburban Neighborhoods, Infill Principles, p. 3-10 Infill or redevelopment shall be consistent with the characteristics of moderate to low density residential use with substantial private yards and off-street parking, or within a Planned Unit Development with characteristics that might otherwise be appropriate. Chapter 3: Land Use, Neighborhood Business Districts, Focus Priorities, p. 3-16 Promote improved site design including parking and access management. Chapter 3: Land Use, Neighborhood Business Districts, Design Principles, p. 3-17 and 3-18 Parking lots should be located to the side or rear of the structure. Landscaping should be provided within the parking lot itself and between parking lots, buildings and the street. Where lots are deep enough, larger buildings may be suitable if they are appropriately screened with compact outlot development along the frontage of the main road. Parking for these buildings may be located between the larger building and the outlot development, but should not occupy significant frontage along the major roadway. Landscaping and screening are to be employed to reduce impact on adjacent residential uses. Chapter 3: Land Use, Business Corridors, Focus Priorities, p. 3-19 Promote improved site design including parking and access management. Chapter 3: Land Use, Business Corridors, Design Principles, p. 3-20 and 3-21 The visual impact of surface parking areas is minimized by placing it between buildings or developing interior blocks and setting buildings to a street line within the site creating pedestrian friendly centers. Perimeter landscaping including evergreen trees and shrubs and deciduous trees provides a green buffer for parking areas and adds green space to the sites. Interior parking islands are used to break up surface parking areas, provide shade and assist in stormwater management. Chapter 3: Land Use, Industrial/Suburban Business Districts, Description, p. 3-22 A green or open space theme and elements should knit the areas together and offset the impact of the large areas of impervious surfaces.

Chapter 3: Land Use, Industrial/Suburban Business Districts, Design Principles, p. 3-24 Naturalized or manicured green areas are included to offset the intensity of the impervious surfaces needed to accommodate the large format buildings and significant surface parking areas for employees. The Euclid Area Industrial/Suburban Business area has slightly smaller lots than those in the Gateway area, with buildings set closer to the street and loading and parking located to the side or rear. This pattern should be maintained in this area. Surface parking areas are broken up by internal planting islands. Chapter 3: Land Use, Gateways and Corridors, Design Principles, p. 3-32 Off-street parking lots located adjacent to the right-of-way of an arterial or collector street are screened from off-site views through the use of a mixture of plant types, heights, and shapes. Chapter 6: Mobility, Introduction, Key Transportation Issues, p. 6-2 Developing parking standards and policies for the downtown, Mathis Avenue, Sudley Road, and Manassas Landing areas. (Strategy 6.2.6) Develop comprehensive parking policies and standards that meet the needs of the business community, visitors, commuters, civic organizations, and residents. (Strategy 6.3.5) Undertake a rewrite of Parking Standards in the Zoning Ordinance as well as the City's transportation policies and procedures to reflect the priorities of this plan and the recommendations of approved sector plans. Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail System Master Plan Overall Vision, Objectives and Strategies, Objective A: Continuous Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail System, Strategies, p. 8 7. Provide secure bicycle parking facilities at public buildings, tourist attractions, parks, schools, libraries, commercial centers, places of public assembly, and public transportation centers. Overall Vision, Objectives and Strategies, Objective E: Trail Amenities, Strategies, p. 10 3. Provide bicycle racks or lockers at the Train Depot, downtown parking garages, and other areas where long-term storage is a concern. Appendix C: Facility Standards and Guidelines, Bicycle Lane, p. 25 Bicycle route signage is provided along the route to specifically indicate that the facility is a bicycle lane. For streets where parking is not permitted, the recommended width of a bicycle lane is at least 4 feet plus the concrete gutter pan. The recommended width of a bicycle lane where parking is permitted is 5 feet. In some situations, the creation of bicycle lanes may not be possible due to width constraints and parking needs. These facilities are also known as Class II Bikeways.