ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

Similar documents
Technical Assistance Panel Proposed MetroLink Station in the Cortex District St. Louis, Missouri

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

SPRINGFIELD, MA Technical Assistance Panel (TAP)

Transportation. Strategies for Action

ULI Boston Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program. Downtown Marlborough

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL. Graniteville TAP: Developing a Community Vision

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Urban Planning and Land Use

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Mini Technical Assistance Panel. Rock Spring Park

KCATA Transit Oriented Development Initiatives

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

NOVEMBER 2016 AARP IN ST. LOUIS & CITIZENS FOR MODERN TRANSIT PLACEMAKING STRATEGIES FOR ST. LOUIS TRANSIT DRAFT

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

October 25 Downtown Partnership and Action Plan Workshop Record of Group Table Results

CORTEX K. OFFICE SPACES FOR THE MODERN WORKSTYLE DEVELOPED BY KOMAN & AVAILABLE Q4 2019

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

The Village of Shirlington

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

ULI Boston Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program. Downtown Hyannis

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

Kensington Center. Public Meeting # Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

The transportation system in a community is an

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

Land Use. Hardware Street Vendor Mixed-Use

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

Forest Hills Improvement Initiative A Partnership for Building a Better Community. Use & Design Guidelines September 23, 2008

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

ALMONO. Hazelwood, City of Pittsburgh. A riverfront investment opportunity combining residential, office and light industrial uses A L M O N O S I T E

Tony Garcia, City-County Planning Commission & Beth Alden, Hillsborough MPO

RIDGES TO RIVERS OPEN SPACE NETWORI< OF THE MID-COLUMBIA DRAFT ACTION PLAN

Michigan City Alternative Analysis Realignment Study. Progress Status Update Report Presentation to City Council February 1, 2012

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

DISCOVER KIRBY GROVE

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

HE VISION. Building a Better Connected Place

Executive Summary. Parks and Recreation Plan. Executive Summary

East Central Area Plan

BRYN MAWR. Tier 2 Characteristics: Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east to Norwood Avenue on the west

Chapter 1: Introduction

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

University Avenue District

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

Access to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Hospitals, and Chapel Hill Transit.

Beaverton City Council: Work Session. SIDEDistrict. May 6, 2014

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel Recommendations. Technical Assistance Panel MetroLink UMSL South Station St.

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Integrated Urban Development. April Reflections from the NZPI Study Tour of Portland, Seattle and Vancouver

WELCOME and introduction

BUDGETING FOR OUTCOMES TRINITY RIVER CORRIDOR

NJ s Land Use and Transit Policies

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

The Lower SaLuda Greenway

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Smart Growth and TOD Land Use (#11) SAWG Meeting

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

NorthPoint, Inc. Community-Based Development Concept

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017

August 2016 COTTAGE GROVE STATION AREA PLANNING REPORT

Volume 2: Implementation Plan

W&OD PARK MASTER PLAN. The City s Greenest Street. DRAFT W&OD Trail Master Plan v4.docx Page 1

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

Blue Line LRT Extension

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Millbrae TOD #2 Project Analysis

Union Station, Los Angeles Dec. 4-9, 2011

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

GO Station Mobility Hubs: Draft Precinct Plans. Committee of the Whole July 12, 2018

Silverdale Regional Center

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Reshaping The City: New Visions for Urban Transport. Trent Lethco, Associate Principal Allison Davis, Senior Planner Vicent Risica, Planner Arup

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

ULI Boston Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Framingham Tech Park

Rights-of-Way Preservation Guidelines

Transcription:

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel Sponsored by: Citizens for Modern Transit in partnership with METRO

ULI St. Louis Mission Statement The mission of the ULI St. Louis is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide.

Technical Assistance Panel Objective, multidisciplinary advice on land use and real estate issues developed over the course of one and a half days ULI St. Louis members from across the region volunteer their time to participate as panelists

TAP Panel Members Panel Work Day: October 30, 2012 Panel Chair Laura Radcliff, Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc. Panel Members Natasha Das Colleen McNitt Ruiz, Lathrop & Gage LLP Brian O Connell, Hilliker Corporation Glenn Powers, St. Louis County Planning Brian Pratt, GreenStreet Development Group LLC Technical Writer & ULI St. Louis District Coordinator: Kelly Annis

CMT, Metro, Cortex & TOD TAP was commissioned by Citizens for Modern Transit (CMT), in keeping with goal of TOD education and advocacy CMT and Metro charged the panel with three questions relating to the station siting, additional parking options, and incentives for further development

Cortex - founding Five educational and research institutions joined forces in 1998 to create Cortex, a not-for-profit organization. With their initiative and ever-expanding community support, Cortex is destined to become the regional and national hub for life science research, development and commercialization. BJC HealthCare Missouri Botanical Garden Saint Louis University University of Missouri St. Louis Washington University

Cortex Boundaries SLU Central West End BJC & Wash U Medical Center Forest Park Forest Park Southeast Botanical Heights SLU Med Center

Proposed Master Plan Euclid Ave Taylor Ave Newstead Ave Boyle Ave Sarah Ave Forest Park Ave Duncan Ave

Cortex District Cortex: 200 acre Innovation Community Transitioning/transforming former industrial area into vibrant, mixed-use knowledge community Phase 1 (1998) $155mm invested, 950 jobs, 124 housing units Heritage Building (Wexford) $73mm, 190,000 sf, 400 jobs New Office Building (BJC) $45mm, 200,000 sf, 1,000 employees Cortex Commons construction begins Aug. 2013 Public infrastructure improvements totaling $40.7mm New I-64/40 interchange at south/center of district Shriners Hospital acquisition for new hospital building

CMT, Metro, Cortex & TOD Cortex s current employees and potential business tenants desire light rail Cortex working with Metro to locate a MetroLink station between Sarah Avenue and Boyle Avenue CMT: with Transportation Oriented Development (TOD) education and advocacy goals, how could a light rail station best support TOD and spark further development? ULI Technical Assistance Panel

Panel s Charge If a MetroLink Station is added to the current system between Boyle and Sarah in Midtown St. Louis, what specific location would maximize the potential benefits for the Cortex development as a whole and best serve residents in the surrounding neighborhoods?

Panel s Charge There are four sites identified for a potential parking garage in the Cortex district. If a MetroLink Station is added to the current system between Boyle and Sarah in Midtown St. Louis, what are the pros and cons of each potential garage site from a TOD perspective? How can specific site design and tenant mix enhance the opportunities?

Panel s Charge What incentives could be utilized to bring in even further development at the site?

Sponsors CMT in partnership with Metro CORTEX Members, City & Elected Officials Washington University, BJC, Saint Louis University, Missouri Botanical Garden Aldermen, SLDC Real Estate Community & Neighborhood Developers, Park Central MODOT Great Rivers Greenway Stakeholder Meetings

Station Location What specific station location would maximize the potential benefits for the Cortex development as a whole and best serve residents in the surrounding neighborhoods?

Station Location SLU Central West End BJC & Wash U Medical Center Forest Park Forest Park Southeast Botanical Heights SLU Med Center

Station Location Forest Park Avenue CORTEX 1 Duncan Avenue Boyle Avenue Cortex Commons (8/13) @4240 BJC AOB MetroLink Alignment Sarah Avenue I-64/40

Station Location Intersection at Boyle Avenue Intersection at Sarah Avenue

Station Location Between Boyle and Sarah Avenues Push to as close to Boyle as possible Open to Commons as front door to the district (as opposed to mid-block, opening to possible parking garage) Provides good proximity to possible parking at new BJC building and parking to the district s southern edge and Forest Park Southeast neighborhood Provide pedestrian, bike access from both streets Include station signage at Boyle and Sarah Push for signature design of station canopy featuring district branding

Station Location

Additional Station Notes Name and brand the station in concert with Cortex/ district branding first impression for those visiting the district Use art, lighting to make station special Use station furniture, billboards to convey information about district Map: You Are Here Advertising for district businesses Share info re: new innovations at work; tv broadcast Note wifi access points, cafes

Additional Station Notes

Parking & Potential Garage(s) Four potential district parking garages: Pros from TOD perspective? Cons? How can design and tenant mix enhance the opportunities?

Parking Garage Options

Parking Garage Site 1 between @4240 and US Metals Duncan Ave Cortex Commons US Metals Site 1, View from Duncan

Parking Garage Site 1 between @4240 and US Metals PROS First floor retail appropriate for Duncan corridor Close proximity to current development Makes the area feel safer Creates a circulator for bikes between Sarah and Boyle and provides signage opportunity off Duncan Accommodates additional uses, mixed use Perhaps the sliver next to Site 1 could become bike station Two possible entrances If entire US Metals site is acquired, orient garage east-west and put a different use along Duncan (keeps cars moving directly from Sarah into the garage, away from pedestrians)

Parking Garage Site 1 between @4240 and US Metals CONS No current site control over US Metals, relocation costs difficult to determine Site is more expensive than others to develop Might need to be the location for the bike station given proximity to proposed Great Rivers Greenway trail Timing might need to be tied to the greenway improvements Draws more traffic into the district be mindful of how increased traffic will impact the experience

Duncan Ave Parking Garage Site 2 north of Duncan, between Boyle & Sarah Cortex Commons US Metals Site 2, View from Duncan

PROS Close to everything under development Parking Garage Site 2 Provides additional parking for residential area, encourages pedestrian traffic, and provide opportunity for rooftop community development for nearby residents Just as close to the station as Site 4 north of Duncan, between Boyle & Sarah

CONS Parking Garage Site 2 In middle of proposed pedestrian corridor Need to enter from Forest Park Avenue, if possible Depth of lot is skinnier would be better oriented northsouth instead of east-west Should not be built in place of residential north of Duncan, between Boyle & Sarah Significant demand for residential, particularly apartments, in the area given proximity to SLU, Wash U Med Center, BJC, etc.

Parking Garage Site 3 current surface lot for Cortex 1 Duncan Ave Cortex Commons Site 3, View from Duncan & Boyle

PROS Parking Garage Site 3 current surface lot for Cortex 1 Accommodates new development on the adjacent site Accommodates current Cortex needs

CONS Parking Garage Site 3 current surface lot for Cortex 1 Does not provide much additional parking beyond current Cortex building and needs of future residential on that site Capacity limited by one deck of parking (should not block view of Cortex building)

Parking Garage Site 4 Commons between Tower Grove & Boyle, north of I-64/40 I-64/40 View FROM Site 4

PROS Parking Garage Site 4 Proximity to new BJC office building and south entrance to Cortex Commons Large enough for mixed use Good visibility to highway between Tower Grove & Boyle, north of I-64/40 Metro envisions moving transfer station to Site 4

CONS Parking Garage Site 4 Potential for cars stacking back onto highway Highest and best use of this site? between Tower Grove & Boyle, north of I-64/40 The master plan notes hotel and retail at Site 4 could be demand for hotel here now Great view into the Commons for cars?

Additional Notes on Parking Need for a comprehensive parking study, overseen by members of Cortex (currently well-served by plentiful surface lots) Periodically review study and district s needs Incorporate multi-user options Include staging of parking meter integration Address: Unified ownership Operation and pricing Use innovative design standards (including height restrictions, new building parking quotas, signage, branding for the district, streetlevel retail, materials lighting)

Financial Incentives Building excess parking now allows for future perks for new businesses locating in district Public sector could participate in building, ownership of garage and enjoy income stream Special purpose bonds (STL Treasurer s Office) MDFB credits Cortex needs corporate donations (match corporations needs with Cortex)

Financial Incentives New Markets Tax Credits Transportation Development District (TDD) or Community Improvement District (CID) via assessment (at this stage as lacking sales tax in district); possibly use as guarantee which would require building owners to cover gap in event of shortfall Use voucher system for transportation for area employees (pricing to encourage transit ridership) Great Rivers Greenway funding

Enhance streetscapes, clean/cut ID community attributes in line with Innovation Community and publicize Provide child care options Provide a bike rental station Offer district-wide wifi Install security stations to call for public safety escort/assistance Incentives Amenities

Incentives Amenities Install electric car charging stations in garages Provide CarShare stations Use priority parking for green vehicles Treat the garage roofs differently green roofs, patios, beer gardens? Wrap office and residential around the parking garages.

Summary Station should be located between Boyle and Sarah, at the western-most point Comprehensive parking study should precede any decisions regarding parking garages, locations No one potential garage site rises to top Incentives to promote development and attract new businesses should include financial incentives as well as amenities for the district