APPENDICES DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 A1

Similar documents
Appendix 4 Park, Trail, and Recreation Facilities For more information, call the Park Planning and Stewardship Division at

Planning Board Briefing

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

Exhibit Planning and Design Workshop February 3-6, Commissioned by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC)

public review draft Key objectives for this chapter are:

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

Montgomery Parks THEN AND NOW A TIMELINE OF PUBLIC PARK PLANNING

Mix of Uses Guide for Transit-Oriented Development MIX OF USES

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

The transportation system in a community is an

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

PLACEMAKING & MOBILITY WORKSHOP. January 27, 2016

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Downtown Huntersville in 2030

Silverdale Regional Center

Thousand Oaks Downtown Core Master Plan. Master Plan Open House April 26, 2018

Creating Quality Places: Successful Communities by Design

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

SW Ecodistrict A VISION PLAN FOR A MORE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE June 25, 2013

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Somers Point Master Plan

Neighborhood Districts

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Urban Park Guidelines

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

Status Report: MD 355 Project

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Rock Spring Master Plan Community Meeting #8: Preliminary Recommendations

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

About Momentum Midland

8. Urban Design. 8.0 Preamble. 8.1 Goals

10.0 Open Space and Public Realm

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Appendix H: Easement cross sections

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Urban Design and Livability

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

DRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines

Shared Principles and Emerging Plan Directions

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

A Vibrant Downtown. Chapter 5 Cary Public Art Opportunities 31

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

VISION, GOALS & CONCEPT DIAGRAM 2.0

Throughout. square. (Crystal City Vision Plan 2050)

Chapter 1: Introduction

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

The Neighbourhood Unit

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

MOUNT BAKER TOWN CENTER: THE 2014 REZONE AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. By Talis Abolins

4 Park Planning and Design

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

Corridor Planning Area

DRAFT City of Titusville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements April 16, 2018

City of Nogales General Plan

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Establish a network of streetscaped vehicle and pedestrian routes that connect within and outside the Plan area.

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Introduction. Community Outreach Approach. Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. Online Questionnaire Summary of Feedback.

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016


Transcription:

APPENDICES DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 A1

App.1 Case Studies by Park Types The upcoming (in-progress) online library will house several case studies illustrating the urban parks types. CIVIC GREEN PLAZA URBAN GREENWAY URBAN RECREATIONAL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD GREEN POCKET GREEN URBAN RECREATIONAL PARKLET TEMPORARY/ INTERIM PARK A2 DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 APPENDICES

App.2 Public Spaces System and Hierarchy App 2.1 System The 2017 PROS Plan recommended that for each urban area, a unique open space system should be planned to serve the projected demographics of residents, workers, and visitors. The urban design vision developed during the master plan or sector plan process for the area will help guide the amount, pattern, location, siting, and design of open spaces. The type and pattern of parks and open spaces best suited to urban populations is different from the suburban model of large tracts of land filled with fixed, single-use facilities. The 2017 PROS Plan recognized that urban areas change the way in which we provide, build, and manage park and recreation resources in those areas. There are distinct challenges, such as the potential to provide park and recreation resources in different ways and create different opportunities to incorporate those resources as urbanizing areas redevelop. The 2017 PROS Plan recommended a system of parks and open spaces at the core of every urban area, provided through a combination of public and private efforts. The new open space system should support a vibrant and sustainable urban center by including open spaces that will be comfortable, attractive, easily accessible, safe, and provide a range of experiences, up to and including festival and outdoor event spaces. Those open spaces that rise to the level of serving as a focal point of community life for the planning area are typically recommended to be publicly owned and managed parks, while those open spaces serving a smaller district, neighborhood, or block are often recommended as public use spaces owned or managed by the private sector. The 2017 PROS Plan recommended that every urban area should have a system of parks and open spaces that include the following attributes: Active recreation - places to exercise outdoors, alone or in groups Social interaction - comfortable seating areas, large public spaces for formal or informal gathering, community gardens Access to green space - ample areas of grass, trees, and other landscaping Relaxation and stress relief - areas away from traffic and urban noise Public accessibility - where anyone can gather or sit or talk Educational experiences - programs to learn from natural or cultural/historic resources Walkability - every residence should have a park or open space within 1/2 mile. Major roads can be barriers that add to the walking time and must be calculated into the minimum distance formula Connectivity - walking and biking systems to link all proposed urban open spaces, and to provide pleasant walking routes from residences and businesses to open space destinations throughout the planning area, and to connect to regional trail and bikeway systems Flexibility - space that can be used for a variety of spontaneous activities and gatherings, and to respond to the changing needs of urban populations Activating Uses nearby shops, restaurants, and residences, attractions, entertainment, as well as places within the park for relaxation, getting work done (Wi-Fi), spontaneous play, education, recreation, etc. A3

App 2.2 Park Types Hierarchy The 2017 PROS Plan recommends that each area master/sector plan include a system of public spaces based on the different roles of each type of space. The amount and size of open spaces may vary from plan to plan but should be directly proportional to the projected density. Each park and public space should respond to the character of existing public spaces and other neighborhood needs. The following hierarchy should be applied to the Energized Public Spaces Plan Study Area: Within the Sector Plan: Social gathering spaces Active recreation destinations Contemplative places An interconnected network of sidewalks, trails, parks and public spaces Civic Green, Plaza, Urban Greenway, Urban Recreational Park Within Neighborhoods: Neighborhood Parks or Neighborhood Greens Within Blocks: Pocket Greens, or Urban Recreational Parklets For Buildings and Residences Private or communal outdoor spaces Figure App.1 illustrates a hierarchy for parks and public spaces from the approved Greater Lyttonsville Sector Plan. Figure App.1 - Park Hierarchy example - Lyttonsville Sector Plan A4 DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 APPENDICES

App 2.3 Public Space Site Selection The public spaces site selection guidelines will be applied in the absence of a sector plan, or the existence of an older sector plan which did not designate public spaces locations. Coordination with the M-NCPPC Planning and Parks Departments will be required. These guidelines are just the initial reference for the process. Site Selection Guidelines Central Location/Focal Point: Place public spaces in central and/or strategic locations to the community and/or neighborhood terminating a vista, on axis to a primary building, street, trail, and/or on a prominent corner. Mixed Use: Provide complementary and mixed land uses surrounding the central public space to make it a destination. Concentrating the location of complementary land uses encourages walking, increases opportunities for human interaction, and encourages synergy and livability of the public realm. Minimize Development in Greenfields: Locate projects within developed areas, if possible, where infrastructure already is in place. Enclosure: Public spaces should be framed and linked to open spaces and primary street networks and must be lined on two sides or more by a public street. Ideally, public spaces in urban areas are best located surrounded on four sides by streets, street trees and sidewalks with high intensity uses and at least one public building facing onto the park. Union Square, SF - centrally located plaza surrounded by shopping, hotels and theater district. The public plaza provides underground parking and it is located near public transit capturing workers, residents in nearby areas and tourists with its several events throughout the year. The ice rink and holiday market are examples of seasonal events hosted by both commercial and nonprofit entities. Source: unionsquareicerink.com APPENDICES DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 A5

Designing Public Spaces Energized Public Spaces Design Guidelines Working Draft December 2018 THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION