Corridor Background. Defining the Corridor Study Area. Lake Street. 38th Street. 46th Street

Similar documents
Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

MINNEHAHA. Hiawatha. Strategic. Framework. Community Works. Investment

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Chapter 1: Introduction

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

#27. Timing: Short term. Costs: $$

Potential Funding Sources: Mn DNR Local Trail Connections Grant City of Minneapolis CIP Hennepin County CIP

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

WELCOME! MINNEHAHA-HIAWATHA Community Works Project. 46th Street Area Lighting Project July 2009

Equitable Growth Through TOD Planning

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

Midtown Greenway PROJECT REPORT CARD

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Elliot Park 2. Neighborhood Master Plan. Historical Perspective

St. Louis Park Wooddale LRT Station Site development guidelines

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

01 the vision NEW LYNN IS WAITING FOR THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

East Bench Master Plan Update

Missing Link Study Grand Rounds Parkway Planning and Design Introduction

Downtown Dubuque...it s a great time.

Build on community input

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: Fax:

WELCOME and introduction

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Chapter 3: Land Use and Local Planning

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Corridor-Level Approaches to Creating Transit-Oriented Districts

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

The transportation system in a community is an

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

Midtown Greenway to lake street

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Wasatch CHOICE for 2040

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Cultivate Hopkins: Built Environment. Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee September 13, 2017

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

DRAFT ROOSEVELT ROAD. District Recommendations. Figure 5.23 The Roosevelt Road Corridor

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

DRAFT City of Titusville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements April 16, 2018

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Silverdale Regional Center

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo

Overview of the Plan. The Building Blocks of Centers, Neighborhoods and Network INTERNAL DRAFT

MAY 2012 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SAINT LOUIS PARK BELTLINE AREA FRAMEWORK & DESIGN GUIDELINES

Issues Requiring Future Study

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Highway 100 / The Grandview Green Feasibility Study

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview March 10, 2011

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

[Leveraging & Improving Neighborhood Connections] Area C Lamar Levee

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Historic Preservation Preserve, restore or adaptively re-use historic structures and landscapes.

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Chapter 3 Land Use and Local Planning

Albert Lea. Redevelopment Plan. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: (763) Fax: (763) wsbeng.

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Public Open House #1

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Blue Line LRT Extension

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Transcription:

1 Corridor Background Defining the Corridor Study Area Minnehaha Avenue (CSAH 48) and Hiawatha Avenue (MN 55) are parallel diagonal roadways, approximately three blocks apart, that provide two direct arterial connection routes between downtown Minneapolis and destinations near and beyond the city s southern border, including Minnehaha Park & Falls, Historic Fort Snelling, Fort Snelling State Park, Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, and the city of St. Paul (via 46th Street/CSAH 48). The study area is defined as the area bounded by Minnehaha Avenue (CSAH 48) to the east, Hiawatha Avenue/Hiawatha LRT line to the west, the Midtown Greenway to the north, and Minnehaha Park & Falls to the south. The study area also includes the properties on the east side of Minnehaha Avenue that directly front onto the street as well as properties adjacent to the three LRT stations west of Hiawatha Avenue. Minnehaha Avenue is a tree-lined street with a mix of residential types and densities interspersed with commercial uses and institutional uses at most of its intersections. Minnehaha Avenue is classified as an A-Minor Arterial roadway and is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County as CSAH 48. Hiawatha Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial and is under the jurisdiction of MnDOT as MN Trunk Highway 55. Two additional diagonal streets, both city streets, are located within the study area. Snelling Avenue connects from Lake Street to 46th Street but is interrupted by large-block commercial areas north of Lake Street and south of 46th Street. Dight Avenue, which was once called Railroad Avenue, connects between 34th Street and 43rd Street only. A freight railroad line runs parallel to and between Minnehaha Avenue and Hiawatha Avenue, located just east of Hiawatha Avenue with a swath of land, less than a block in width, between the railroad tracks and the roadway. As a result of the freight railroad line, the land uses along the east side of Hiawatha Avenue are predominately industrial with some commercial uses interspersed. By far the most visible industrial structures are the numerous tall grain mills and elevators located between 34th Street and 42nd Street. A major investment in and transformation of the corridor occurred in 2004 when the Hiawatha LRT line was completed on the west side of the corridor, connecting from downtown Minneapolis to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the Mall of America, and the city of Bloomington. The Hiawatha Ave LRT line runs directly along the west side of Hiawatha Avenue through the entire study area. Three LRT stations are located in the study area at Lake Street/Midtown, 38th Street, and 46th Street. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor crosses 18 east-west streets from Lake Street to Minnehaha Parkway. However, due to the presence of the freight railroad line, the related industrial areas, the highway, and the recent installation of the LRT line, just seven (7) of these streets connect all the way through the corridor, which are Lake Street, 32nd Street, 35th Street, 38th Street, 42nd Street, 46th Street, and Minnehaha Parkway. Seven (7) additional east-west streets connect from Minnehaha Ave to 46th Street looking west from Snelling Avenue. Lake Street 38th Street 46th Street Project area aerial photo. Corridor Background - Page 7

Hiawatha Ave but do not connect across Hiawatha Ave and the LRT line to the west. Four (4) streets do not connect between Minnehaha Ave and Hiawatha Ave. North of Lake Street, there is no east-west street connection within the corridor. The Midtown Greenway bike and pedestrian pathway bridges over Hiawatha Avenue (MN 55) at 28th Street via the Martin Olav Sabo Bridge, which was completed in 2007. Understanding the Corridor s Origins The emergence of this unique diagonal corridor appears to have originated from an early Native American trail between Fort Snelling Military Reserve and St. Anthony Falls that was improved as a territorial road (called Fort Snelling Road) around 1850 and generally corresponds to the route of present-day Minnehaha Avenue. In 1890, the Minnehaha Falls-Fort Snelling electric street car line was completed on Minnehaha Avenue south to Minnehaha Park. As an historic trail, territorial road and urban multimodal transportation street (horse carriage, electric street car, automobile, bus, and bicycle), Minnehaha Avenue has a long history of serving as a community arterial roadway that connects places and destinations. The development of commercial nodes at many of the intersections along Minnehaha Avenue is linked to the electric street car line and its frequent stops. As the second railroad line to be developed in the state of Minnesota, the Minnesota Central Railway line was built in 1864 along the west side of present-day Minnehaha Avenue to connect St. Anthony Falls and Fort Snelling and points beyond, ultimately linking Minneapolis and Chicago by 1869. Hiawatha Avenue appears to have originally been built along the west side of the railway as Minneapolis expanded its city limits southward. Two additional diagonal streets located within the corridor Snelling Avenue and Dight Avenue (once called Railroad Avenue) also define the Minnehaha- Hiawatha corridor. Leveraging the Corridor s Planned Growth Primarily as a result of the addition of the Hiawatha LRT line amenity on the west side of the corridor, significant growth in both population and employment is projected for the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor. Within the corridor, the City has designated three Activity Centers, an Industrial Employment District, a Neighborhood Commercial Node, a Commercial Corridor, and two Community Corridors. The entire corridor is essentially designated as part of the Transit Station Areas, which includes the area within 1/2 mile radius of each LRT station. In addition, some of the existing industrial areas in the south portion of the corridor are designated as Transitional Industrial, which are industrial areas located outside of the Industrial Employment Districts that the City foresees transitioning eventually to non-industrial uses that are compatible with surrounding development. The three (3) Activity Centers are centered around Hiawatha/Minnehaha & Lake St, Hiawatha & 38th St, and Hiawatha & 46th St. Activity Centers are guided to be mixeduse areas with high density residential, retail, and office uses. Due to the relatively low intensity uses present in these Activity Centers today, these areas are ripe for significant growth in population and jobs. The station area master plans also guide these Activity Centers for major redevelopment and growth appropriate for transit station areas. In support of the Activity Centers growth, the transitional industrial areas also have redevelopment potential that could contribute significantly to the corridor s growth. The Hiawatha Industrial Employment District consists of the area along the east side of Hiawatha Avenue between 31st St and 35th St. The Industrial Employment District designation protects this area as prime industrial space and a targeted area for industrial growth, with a particular focus on employment growth. Similar to the Activity Centers, the relatively low intensity industrial uses in this area today offer significant potential for industrial development and employment growth. With the growing national trend of transitioning to more sustainable or green industries, the Hiawatha industrial district has the potential to enhance existing businesses, attract new businesses, and undertake public infrastructure improvements that contribute to creating a green industrial district. Page 8 - Corridor Background

Lake Street LRT Station Platform. Corridor Background - Page 9

Freight rail service near 38th Street. The other targeted growth areas outside of the three Activity Centers are the Neighborhood Commercial Node at Minnehaha & 38th St. and Minnehaha Avenue, which is designated as a Community Corridor. The City s comprehensive plan targets growth in and adjacent to Neighborhood Commercial Nodes in the form of mediumand high-density housing and taller buildings (at least two stories for a new building). Community Corrridors are targeted for the development of medium-density housing where it is compatible with the character of existing development. Establishing Neighborhood Livability Elements The Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project approaches the corridor s future potential and reinvestment needs based on maintaining and improving neighborhood livability. Five (5) neighborhood livability elements have been identified, which consist of the following: Mobility, land use and physical resources, environment and natural resources, economic development, and social/cultural/heritage. Supporting each neighborhood livability element is a set of livability indicators. Livability indicators are bits of information that tell a story about a place. They provide insight into a place s quality of life as well as the overall direction of the neighborhood, whether it is improving, declining or staying the same. A combination of indicators can provide a measuring system to provide information about past trends, current realities, and future directions in order to aid decision-making. Indicators may or may not be part of a benchmarking process (a process that establishes numeric goals to measure progress). These neighborhood livability elements and indicators were originally established in the Baseline Data Inventory, which is the first component of the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project. The Mobility element encompasses accessibility to convenient transportation options for getting to destinations both inside and outside the corridor. The options should include walking, biking, driving, and public transit for residents, employees and visitors of the corridor. The key physical spaces of this element are streets, sidewalks, trails and railroad lines. As a corridor with regional transportation features (MN 55, Hiawatha LRT Existing highway-oriented retail development near 46th Street & Hiiawatha Avenue. Page 10 - Corridor Background

line, and the freight railroad corridor), mobility needs to sensitively balance the local needs of residents with the regional needs of moving people and goods. The following neighborhood livability indicators are recommended for monitoring and improving the corridor s Mobility element: Walkability Mobility Choice Bicycle Friendly Connectivity The Land Use and Physical Resources element involves existing and planned physical development within the corridor, including existing and planned land uses, existing and planned development patterns, potential redevelopment sites and projects, building form (height, massing, placement, and street orientation), etc. Adopted land use plans, zoning regulations, redevelopment master plans, and proposed redevelopment concepts are intended to be key guides of the corridor s future land use and physical development patterns. The following neighborhood livability indicators are recommended for monitoring and improving the corridor s Land Use and Physical Resources element: Housing Options Convenient Access to Retail & Services Transit-Oriented Development Convenient Access to Parks and Green Space Quality of Public Spaces Conditions of Existing Buildings Green Building Practices Walking west along 38th Street toward Hiawatha Ave. Environment and Natural Resources includes managing the impact of the corridor s development on the natural environment and resources related to the corridor, including the land, water, vegetation, and air resources. Significant features of the corridor s natural system include the Minnehaha Creek corridor, the Mississippi River, and the natural open spaces and parks located near the corridor. The following neighborhood livability indicators are recommended for monitoring and improving the corridor s Environment and Natural Resources element: Water Quality Contaminated Land Water Use Urban Forest Air Quality Waste Reduction Energy Use Energy Production Night Sky Economic Development relates to maintaining and strengthening the corridor s economy, including job opportunities, household incomes, business profits, property values, and provision of desired retail/services/entertainment businesses for residents and employees. The following neighborhood livability indicators are recommended for monitoring and improving the corridor s Economic Development element: Running along Minnehaha Parkway. Industrial Business Climate Corridor Background - Page 11

Minnehaha Avenue. Page 12 - Corridor Background

Commercial Business Climate Residential Investment & Stability Social, Cultural and Heritage involves the neighborhood s sense of community and identity, including social, cultural and heritage. The following neighborhood livability indicators are recommended for monitoring and improving the corridor s Social, Cultural and Heritage element: Heritage Preservation Safe Community Community Identity Identifying the Corridor s Partner Jurisdictions The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor study area encompasses many jurisdictions that have a stake in the five (5) neighborhood livability elements identified above. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project is founded on bringing these jurisdictions together as partners to establish corridor revitalization concepts, strategies, and projects for coordinated future public and private reinvestments in the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor. Mobility Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Housing, Community Works & Transit (HCWT) City of Minneapolis Historic Fire Station MFD No. 21 on Minnehaha Avenue. Bike lanes on Minnehaha Avenue. Corridor Background - Page 13

Public Works Minneapolis Parks & Recreation Board (MPRB) Metropolitan Council / Metro Transit Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB) Federal and State Department of Transportation (DOT & MnDOT) At the federal level, the departments of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Department of Transportation (DOT) have partnered to form the Partnership for Sustainable Communities which will be an important partner in implementing the Strategic Investment Framework. The Partnership will: enhance integrated planning and investment provide a vision for sustainable growth redefine housing affordability and make it transparent - redevelop underutilized sites develop livability measures and tools align HUD, DOT and EPA programs and undertake joint research, data collection and outreach. (see www.epa. gov/smartgrowth/partnership/ index.html) Land Use & Physical Resources City of Minneapolis Community Planning and Economic Development (CPED) Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Hennepin County HCWT Longfellow Community Council (LCC) Corcoran Neighborhood Organization (CNO) Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association (SENA) Nokomis East Neighborhood Association (NENA) East Phillips Improvement Coalition (EPIC) Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) District Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Environment & Natural Resources City of Minneapolis Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Hennepin County Environmental Services (HCES) Economic Development City of Minneapolis CPED Longfellow Business Association (LBA) Lake Street Council (LSV) Hennepin County HCWT Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development (Mn DEED) Social, Cultural & Heritage Longfellow Community Council (LCC) Corcoran Neighborhood Organization (CNO) Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association (SENA) Nokomis East Neighborhood Association (NENA) East Phillips Improvement Coalition (EPIC) City of Minneapolis Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Page 14 - Corridor Background

Summary of Corridor Issues The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor has been the subject of extensive study over the years. Each of these studies and plans typically has a vision, guiding principles or core values. The Strategic Investment Framework establishes and embraces the five (5) previously identified neighborhood livability elements as a means to organize the themes that are embodied within many of these past plans and studies. To build upon and confirm these themes, the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project conducted an extensive public outreach and input process in the corridor during 2008. The public input received was analyzed and summarized into a series of issues questions that represent the key concerns, needs, and desires heard from participants in the public outreach/input process as well as the themes identified in previous studies and plans. As the corridor is presented with improvement and reinvestment opportunities in the future, either public or private, it will be beneficial to have the opportunity to refer to this summary of issues for evaluating to what degree a particular opportunity is consistent with the vision for the corridor. Below, these issues are organized around the five (5) neighborhood livability elements: Mobility, Land Use and Physical Resources, Environment and Natural Resources, Economic Development and Social/ Cultural/ Heritage. The list of issue questions is in not in any specific order. Mobility 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. How do we improve bike access and safety? How do we improve pedestrian access and safety? How can we improve traffic flow? How can streets be designed to accommodate all users and how can design influence users behavior? How can transit efficiently and adequately serve the community: particularly disabled, specific destinations and frequency? Commercial businesses near the 41st Street & Minnehaha Avenue intersection. Corridor Background - Page 15

Land Use and Physical Resources 1. What is the impact of the changing character of the community: building scale/ mass, more people and traffic, tenure or ownership? 2. What is the long term role of industrial land use? 3. How do we maintain the availability of or options for affordable housing: general and senior? 4. What is the appropriate balance of park/open space? 5. How does government regulation impact the corridor? Environment and Natural Resources 1. How do we live/develop sustainably? 2. How do we achieve a cleaner environment? 3. How do we live more locally? 4. How do we build a more green community? 5. How do we manage storm water responsibly? Economic Development 1. How do we retain existing business? 2. How do we enhance the retail environment of the corridor? 3. How do we modernize or revitalize older commercial/industrial spaces to meet current needs? 4. How do we provide a diversity of jobs in the corridor? 5. How do we address demand for parking: LRT and business? 6. How will public improvement projects impact local or existing businesses? Social, Cultural and Heritage 1. Physical features divide the community corridor. (Hiawatha Avenue, LRT, heavy rail corridor, sound walls and overhead utility corridor) 2. How do we decrease crime in the area? 3. There is a lack of opportunities to get to know your neighbors lack of entertainment and recreational opportunities in the corridor. 4. What are the impacts of changing a demographic profile: gentrification (income/ racial), aging, generational shift. 5. How do we encourage maintenance of property and preserve a strong image for the community? 6. How do we maintain commercial character: historic preservation? Page 16 - Corridor Background

The freight rail lines along Hiawatha Avenue. Corridor Background - Page 17

Recent housing investment in the corridor.