Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Similar documents
STREAM BUFFERS

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

Section 11 Grading and Drainage Standards

Stormwater Management Resource Type:

City of Lafayette Staff Report

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

APPENDIX C: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (prev. Ordinance #2008-1)

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

LONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

Urban Planning and Land Use

SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

SECTION 1 CLEARING /GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION:

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

6Natural. Environment Development Permit Guidelines

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

Project: Developer/Designer: Reviewer: I. Narrative: 1. Project Description: Describes the nature and purpose of the land disturbing activity.

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

LONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Washington County, Maryland Division of Public Works Policy Manual

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

Appendix I. Checklists

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

IV. Development in the Rural Overlay District

Drainage Control Plans

STORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

River Corridor Overlay Zone (RCOZ) Article 5

PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 15 LAND MANAGEMENT CODE - CHAPTER 2.21

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

Rule D Wetland and Creek Buffers

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Urban Stormwater: Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines. CSIRO This electronic edition published by CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2006.

CITY OF SCANDIA ORDINANCE NO. 174

Section General Tree Preservation Requirements for New Nonresidential and Residential Development

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA STEARNS COUNTY MINNESOTA ORDIANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Article 6 Tree Protection

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

North Metro Natural Gas Pipeline Project Routing Study. Exhibit I: Comment and Response Document

17.18 SENSITIVE AREAS

City of Shady Cove Riparian Ordinance Ordinance XXX

City of Mt. Juliet Planning & Zoning Department. Site Plan Checklist. Site plan cklist v1.18

SOP 6: Erosion and Sedimentation Control SOP 6: EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

ORDINANCE NO LC

Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Town of Windsor. Stormwater Manual

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

ARTICLE 3 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS

Plat Requirements CHECKLIST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

DCA , Stormwater Quality and Facilities Ordinance June 23, 2009

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

Environmental Protection Ordinances (Performance Zoning) Bedminster Township, Bucks County

Plan Review Checklist

Palmdale Municipal Code (Excerpts) Title 14: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 14.04: JOSHUA TREE AND NATIVE DESERT VEGETATION PRESERVATION

SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Part 5. Environmental Protection Overlay District Regulations

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan

Town of Excelsior, Sauk County, Wisconsin DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

Your town s subdivision or land use ordinance standards should reference the following street standards, for example:

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

SECTION 11.07: WETLAND BUFFER ORDINANCE

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

A. General Plan: Land Use, Growth Management and the Built Environment Element. d. Use visually unobtrusive building materials.

NAPA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Standards & Specifications

Soil Erosion and Sediment Control

City of Sun Prairie Wetland Buffer Reduction Request

C HAPTER 9: E NVIRONMENTAL P ROTECTION

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

Water Sensitive Urban Design Site Development Guidelines and Practice Notes. Appendix

ARTICLE VI AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION DISTRICT

Transcription:

CHAPTER 10 - WASHES SECTION 10.0 GENERAL: A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish standards for development in or near Major and Minor Washes as defined in Appendix A Glossary of Terms and Definitions which will conserve land in its natural state, protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents, and prevent unnecessary alteration of the natural environment. B. The desert terrain within the Town of Cave Creek contains significant drainage ways. Special regulations are necessary in order to protect these natural features and are based on the intensity of land disturbance, density, and including but not limited to, the natural characteristics of high desert terrain, such as: steepness of slope, significant vegetation, landforms, soil and rock stability, and existing drainage patterns. These regulations are intended to allow for responsible development in wash areas while minimizing the physical and visual impact of such development. C. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this Ordinance and other Federal, State of Arizona, Maricopa County, other adopted Town Codes or Ordinances, the more restrictive shall apply. SECTION 10.1 DESIGN STANDARDS: A. The minimum Grading & Drainage design standards as contained in the Town of Cave Creek Technical Design Guideline Number 1 Grading & Drainage and this Ordinance shall apply to all construction projects located within the Town. B. All buildings, structures, roads, and drives shall, to the fullest extent practicable, follow and utilize the natural contours of the land to minimize disturbance of all washes. C. No disturbance shall be permitted beyond the approved non-disturbance boundaries either during or after construction. D. The boundaries of construction and proposed disturbance areas shall be clearly staked in the field and outlined with temporary construction fencing, prior to and during construction. Non-disturbance boundaries shall conform to those depicted on a Town approved Site Plan. Effective 12.22.2011 Page 1 of 5

E. Land disturbed in violation of this Ordinance shall, upon notice by the Town, be required to be re-graded to the original natural contours of the site and be revegetated with indigenous plants of the same species, size, and at a similar density present on undisturbed land adjacent to the disturbance (see the Town of Cave Creek Technical Design Guideline Number 4 Landscaping). F. Proposed improvements or additions to existing structures or other property improvements within or near wash areas are subject to the regulations established in this Ordinance. Proposals for such improvements or additions shall be accompanied by an exhibit showing the necessary calculations used to determine that the minimum Ordinance requirements have been satisfied. G. The development of properties containing Major Wash areas is subject to the following: 1. A 100-year Floodplain and Erosion Setback Analysis of the Major Wash, prepared by an Arizona registered Civil Engineer, shall be required in those cases in which a current Federal, State of Arizona or Maricopa County study of the subject Major Wash does not exist. 2. All development impacting a Major Wash shall comply with all Federal, State of Arizona and Maricopa County Flood Control District regulations. 3. The 100-year floodplain and erosion setback of the Major Wash shall be preserved in their natural condition. Exceptions to this provision shall apply for necessary roadways, driveways and utility service easements. 4. The minimum grading & drainage design standards as contained in the Town of Cave Creek Technical Design Guideline Number 1 Grading & Drainage shall apply. H. Development of properties containing Minor Wash areas is subject to the following: 1. A 100-year Floodplain and Erosion Setback Analysis of the Minor Wash, prepared by an Arizona registered Civil Engineer, shall be required in those cases in which a current Federal, State of Effective 12.22.2011 Page 2 of 5

Arizona or Maricopa County study of the subject Minor Wash does not exist. 2. Minor Washes and drainage features shall be retained in their natural state where possible. 3. All development impacting a Minor Wash shall comply with all Federal, State of Arizona and Maricopa County Flood Control District regulations. 4. A Minor Wash may be rerouted on-site pending approval of the Maricopa County Flood Control District and the Town Engineer. 5. An Arizona registered Civil Engineer shall determine the 100 year floodplain and erosion setbacks of the redesigned channel so as to handle the 100-year floodplain with a minimum of one foot (1 ) of freeboard. The subject channel shall be designed so as to replicate the natural topography of the site. 6. All engineered channels must be reviewed and approved by the Maricopa County Flood Control District and the Town Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 7. The minimum grading & drainage design standards as contained in the Town of Cave Creek Technical Design Guideline Number 1 Grading & Drainage shall apply. SECTION 10.2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE: A. Retention basins and new drainage channels shall be designed so as to project the natural desert character of the site. See the Town of Cave Creek Technical Design Guideline Number 1 Grading & Drainage for additional details. B. The construction of all storm water features (e.g. basins, channel bottoms, and headwalls) shall utilize native materials. C. Contouring shall be designed to replicate the natural topography of the site and enhance the aesthetics of all drainage basins, and channels. Basin slopes shall not exceed a 4:1 slope (horizontal to vertical). D. For any grading, which impacts the natural drainage patterns on a parcel, the historical drainage must be maintained at the parcel boundaries. This Effective 12.22.2011 Page 3 of 5

includes drainage location, volume, velocity, sediment yield and the direction of flow off the parcel. SECTION 10.3 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS: A. Plan submittal. All plans submitted to the Town for review shall be stamped and sealed by an Arizona registered Civil Engineer. In order to obtain a Building Permit for a lot or parcel within a wash area, the following plans, studies and/or reports are required to be submitted to, and approved by the Town Engineer: 1. A detailed Site Plan as described in this Ordinance shall be provided. 2. The Site Plan shall depict at a minimum the following: a. The current and proposed contours of the parcel; b. The original drainage pattern (natural course) and all proposed changes to the drainage pattern. 3. Three or more cross sections shall be taken at different locations throughout the building site and drawn perpendicular to the existing contours. Said cross sections shall be drawn with a vertical to horizontal ratio of 1:1 and shall clearly be shown on the Site Plan. 4. A Site Analysis shall be required for any, Site Plan or Subdivision Plat which contains a wash area. The subject Site Analysis shall contain a Natural Wash Corridor Analysis, and other Engineering Analyses that may be required by the Town Engineer. All maps shall be at the same scale as the associated Site Plan. The Natural Wash Corridor Analysis shall, at a minimum, identify all washes recognized as Waters of the U.S. by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and shall include information on the habitat value of each particular wash. 5. The Town may require additional information as necessary to evaluate all related proposed development plans. Effective 12.22.2011 Page 4 of 5

Effective 12.22.2011 Page 5 of 5